This application is a 371 of PCT/EP2007/008317 filed Sep. 25, 2007, which in turn claims the priority of DE 10 2006 045 685.8 filed Sep. 27, 2006, the priority of both applications is hereby claimed and both applications are incorporated by reference herein.
The invention concerns a method for automatically controlling a marine propulsion system with a surface-piercing propeller.
Surface-piercing propellers are often used in fast ships. Surface-piercing propellers can be varied both in their depth of immersion and towards port or starboard to control the ship. Hereinafter, the depth of immersion of the surface-piercing propeller will be referred to as the trim position. In this regard, a trim position of +100% corresponds to a maximum emersion position, and a trim position of −100% corresponds to a maximum immersion depth of the propeller. In practice, a ship's navigator sets the subjectively best trim position by means of a control element. However, this results in an additional burden on the navigator besides his nautical tasks. During dynamic operations, he often lacks the criteria for evaluating the best trim position.
WO 2004/020281 A1 discloses a measure for improving this situation. It proposes a method for automatically adjusting a surface-piercing propeller as a function of the current operating state of the ship. The current operating state in turn is derived from the ship's speed, a steering angle, the position of a throttle control, and parameters of the internal combustion engine. However, this source does not describe a practical embodiment.
DE 195 15 481 A1 discloses a method and a device for the automatic load control of a marine propulsion system with a variable-pitch propeller. This device comprises a closed-loop speed control system for automatically controlling the speed of revolution of the internal combustion engine and a system controller for controlling the variable-pitch propeller. From the power desired by the navigator, i.e., the throttle control setting, a set speed is computed by a first engine map as a reference input for the closed-loop speed control system. A set blade pitch to be used as a setpoint value for the system controller is likewise derived from the power desired by the navigator by means of a second engine map. The set blade pitch is then converted by the system controller to an actuating variable for the variable-pitch propeller. This process also takes into account the power reserve of the internal combustion engine, a speed control deviation, and a speed gradient in accordance with an increase or decrease of the blade pitch.
In this method, a large change in the desired power brings about a change in the set speed and the set blade pitch that is immediate and in the same direction. The closed-loop speed control system has a large system-related step response time. Therefore, a change in the correcting variable, for example, the injection quantity, produces a change in the actual speed and in the quantities derived from it only after a time delay. The set blade pitch, on the other hand, is rapidly converted by the control unit to an actuating variable for the variable-pitch propeller. Since the variable-pitch propeller with the adjustment hydraulics has a large time constant, this response is moderated.
The method known from DE 195 15 481 A1 cannot be exactly translated to a marine propulsion system with a surface-piercing propeller. The reason for this is the significantly shorter response time of the surface-piercing propeller compared to a variable-pitch propeller. For example, an exact translation would cause a large load on the internal combustion engine after a change in the amount of power desired, and as a result, the acceleration of the ship would be delayed.
The objective of the invention is thus to adapt the method known from the prior art to a marine propulsion system with a surface-piercing propeller.
The method is characterized by the fact that the desired power is interpreted as a set speed and that a speed control deviation is computed from the set speed and the actual speed of the internal combustion engine. An injection quantity for the automatic speed control of the internal combustion engine is in turn determined by a speed controller from the speed control deviation, and an effective speed is computed. The effective speed is the reference input of the system controller, which automatically controls the trim position of the surface-piercing propeller. The power reserve is also taken into account in the automatic control of the trim position.
The method of the invention thus differs from the prior art described above in that the reference input for the system controller is not derived directly from the desired power but rather from the effective speed. Another difference is that the trim position of the surface-piercing propeller is automatically controlled.
The effective speed is computed by an engine map, in which preferably a step function is mapped. Short-term changes in the actual speed, for example, due to waves, cause no change in the effective speed. The effective speed is thus a robust reference input. The effective speed is corrected by internal engine characteristics, for example, the charge pressure of an exhaust gas turbocharger.
A first pitch angle is determined from the effective speed by a trim preassignment unit with several selectable engine maps. The selection of an engine map is made as a function of the number of coupled drive shafts and the direction of thrust, for example, curved travel or reverse travel. The engine maps bring about improved adaptation of the propulsion system to the external conditions. For example, during reverse travel, the trim position is changed in the direction −100%, so that the water moved by the surface-piercing propeller flows through under the stern of the ship. This greatly reduces the flow resistance.
The first pitch angle in turn is processed together with the power reserve in a load control unit, which generates the reference input (here: the second pitch angle) for the trim controller and a first pitch rate. The trim controller then defines the trim position on the basis of the second pitch angle, the actual trim position and the first pitch rate.
In a very general way, the advantages of the invention consist in the fact that the internal combustion engine stays in the tested load range during significant changes in the desired power and that the automatic control of the trim position represents a corresponding convenience for the navigator. In addition, the engine maps are designed in such a way in practice that at each operating point, an economical and effective operating state is automatically adjusted.
The drawings illustrate a preferred embodiment of the invention.
The operating mode of the internal combustion engine 2 is determined by the electronic engine control unit (ADEC) 7, which contains the usual components of a microcomputer system, for example, a microprocessor, interface adapters, buffers, and memory components (EEPROM, RAM). Operating characteristics that are relevant to the operation of the internal combustion engine 2 are applied in the memory components in the form of engine maps/characteristic curves. The electronic engine control unit 7 uses these to compute the output variables from the input variables.
The input signals of the system controller 8 are: the effective speed nEFF, the power reserve PRES, a direction of thrust SRI, and the actual trim position POS(IST) of the surface-piercing propeller 5. The output signal of the system controller 8 is a control signal STS for triggering the actuator 12, by which the trim position POS is then adjusted. The system controller 8 presets the control signal STS for conversion to the trim position POS for the surface-piercing propeller as an absolute angular value in degrees, as a percent of the immersion depth, for example, +20%, or as a pitch rate in degrees/second or percent/second. The system controller 8 contains a trim preassignment unit 9 with several selectable engine maps KF1 to KF3, a load control unit 10 for limiting the trim position, and an automatic trim control unit 11 for automatically controlling the trim position POS. The load control unit 10 is shown in
The system has the following functionality:
The navigator defines the power he desires via the position of the throttle control 6. The position of the throttle control 6 is interpreted as the set speed nSL. Further explanation will now be provided with reference to
A first pitch angle Phi1 is determined by the trim preassignment unit 9 from the effective speed nEFF. To this end, the trim preassignment unit 9 contains several engine maps, which are designated KF1, KF2, and KF3 in
The second pitch angle Phi2 corresponds to the reference input for the automatic trim control unit 11, which will be described in greater detail with reference to
As an alternative, the load control unit 10 can be designed in such a way that the second signal S2 and the sixth signal S6 are not computed as a function of the power reserve PRES, but rather the two signals are set to a constant value.
The load control unit 10 has the following functionality:
When the load control unit 10 changes from the deactivated state to the activated state, the switches 18 and 22 change their switching position. This change is initiated by the control block 20. In the activated state, both the second pitch angle Phi2 and the first pitch rate VSR1 are computed (engine maps 17, 21) as a function of the power reserve PRES. The load control unit 10 is active if
PRES<GW1 after t1 (turn-on delay) or
PRES<GW1+GW2 or
PRES>GW1+GW2 before t2 has elapsed (turn-off delay)
where PRES is the power reserve, GW1 and GW2 are freely applicable limits, and t1 and t2 are time stages.
The control block 20 changes the switching state of the switch 19 by the fifth signal S5 if the load control unit 10 is activated and the following condition is present:
GW1<PRES<GW1+GW2 (dead band)
In this case, the pitch rate VSR1 has the value zero.
The specification reveals the following advantages of the invention:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 045 685 | Sep 2006 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/008317 | 9/25/2007 | WO | 00 | 8/5/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/037423 | 4/3/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4534738 | McKnight | Aug 1985 | A |
4639192 | Harrell | Jan 1987 | A |
4939660 | Newman et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5171172 | Heaton et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5203727 | Fukui | Apr 1993 | A |
5326294 | Schoell | Jul 1994 | A |
5352137 | Iwai et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5647780 | Hosoi | Jul 1997 | A |
5785562 | Nestvall | Jul 1998 | A |
5862794 | Yoshioka | Jan 1999 | A |
6431927 | Sage | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6458003 | Krueger | Oct 2002 | B1 |
20020174818 | Von Wolske et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030077953 | Kaji | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040014376 | Noyes | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20100030410 | Faller et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
195 15 481 | Oct 1996 | DE |
10048103 | Sep 2002 | DE |
102006045685 | Jul 2006 | DE |
0230740 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2004020281 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004020281 | Mar 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100030410 A1 | Feb 2010 | US |