Method for controlling an active restraint system

Abstract

A method for controlling an active restraint system in a motor vehicle includes the following steps: providing of several status signals, transferring of the status signals to a control algorithm as input values, and controlling the active restraint system according to the result of the control algorithm. The method is characterized by the following steps: checking whether one or more of the status signals have failed, reproducing a failed status signal, and replacing the failed status signal by its reproduction.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates to a method for controlling an active restraint system in a motor vehicle.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Information concerning the current status of the vehicle as regards driving dynamics is necessary for the activation of an active restraint system in a motor vehicle, e.g. a reversible belt tensioner system. Several sensors provide status signals for this, which are transferred as input values to a control algorithm. The control algorithm continuously evaluates the input values and decides whether, and possibly in which way, the active restraint system is activated (result of the control algorithm). In particular, the wheel rotation speed, the steering angle of the wheels, the yaw rate, longitudinal acceleration, transverse acceleration and brake activity (e.g. exceeding a particular brake pressure), are taken into consideration as input values.

If one or more of the sensors fail, the corresponding input values can not be transferred to the algorithm. The status as regards driving dynamics can not be determined precisely, or not precisely enough. In such a case, it is not possible to control the active restraint system properly in relation to the vehicle status, i.e. the system is no longer able to function.

It is an object of the invention to increase the reliability against failure of an active restraint system.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

To solve this problem, the invention proposes a method for controlling an active restraint system in a motor vehicle. The method comprises the following steps: providing several status signals, transferring the status signals to a control algorithm as input values, and controlling the active restraint system according to the result of the control algorithm. The method is characterized by the following steps: checking whether one or more of the status signals have failed, reproducing a failed status signal, and replacing the failed status signal by the reproduction. The invention is based on the finding that particular status values can be reproduced by computation from other status values on the basis of reciprocal geometric or physical dependencies. In accordance with the invention, a failed status signal is replaced by the reproduction, so that the necessary input value can be transferred to the control algorithm. The failure or malfunction of a sensor therefore does not automatically lead to a failure of the active restraint system. In this context, a (failed) status signal is to be understood to mean not only a signal which is not present, but also a faulty or incomplete signal.

For reproducing the failed status signal, a signal can be used which is not provided as an input value for the control algorithm. This is important when a failed status signal can not be reproduced from the other status signals which are transferred as an input value to the control algorithm. In such a case, other information is drawn upon to reproduce the failed status signal, e.g. information concerning the gear which is engaged, the engine speed or the (differential) gear ratio.

Protection of the function of the active restraint system can be further increased by at least one other reproduced status signal being used to reproduce the failed status signal. In this way, the function of the active restraint system can even be maintained when several status signals have failed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of the method according to the invention; and

FIG. 2 shows a two-track model of a motor vehicle.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In FIG. 1 a possible practical realization of the method according to the invention is illustrated in the form of a block diagram. The control algorithm requires n status signals as input values. The supplied status signals are processed in the block “signal reproductions”. A check is made here as to whether the individual status signals are complete and free of error. A failed (i.e. missing, faulty or incomplete) status signal is reproduced from the status signals or other signals which are present. The failed status signal is then replaced by its reproduction and is supplied as an input value to the control algorithm.

The reproduction of particular status signals in accordance with the invention is explained below with the aid of examples. Particular status values can be calculated mathematically from other values with the basis of a suitable driving dynamics model. The two-track model illustrated in FIG. 2 comes into consideration, for example, as a driving dynamics model. The geometric values shown in FIG. 2 are designated as follows:

A: centre of rotation,

R: radius of rotation of the vehicle,

L: wheel base,

t: track width,

δ_l, δ_o: steering angle of the inner curve and outer curve wheel.

Other values, such as the speed of the vehicle or the rotation rate of the wheel are independent of the selected geometric model.

The following formulae or approximations are produced:

• • (1), (2), (3)

with

Ω_z: yaw rate,

V: vehicle speed,

A_y: transverse acceleration.

In addition, the rotational speed of the wheel (and hence also the speed of the vehicle) can be calculated from the engine speed and the transmission between the engine and the driven wheel: W=E·D·G   (4)

with

W: rotational speed of the wheel,

E: engine speed,

D: differential gear ratio,

G: gear ratio (dependent on selected gear).

In the case of a failure or malfunction of a sensor, the associated status signals for the wheel rotation speed W, the steering angle of the wheels δ_l and δ_o, the yaw rate Ω_z and the transverse acceleration A_y can be reproduced, by means of these formulae or approximations, as follows:

• • On failure of the yaw rate signal Ω_z, this is estimated from the vehicle speed V, the wheel base L, the track width t and the steering angle δ_o: The radius of rotation R can be determined from (3) and can be inserted into the formula for the calculation of the yaw rate (1).
  • On failure of the transverse acceleration signal A_y, this is estimated from the vehicle speed V and the yaw rate Ω_z, inserted in (2).
  • On failure of the wheel rotational speed signal W, this is estimated from the engine speed E and the transmission ratio between the engine and the driven wheel, taking into account the selected gear, inserted in (4).
  • On failure of the steering angle signal δ_{l, o}, this is estimated from the transverse acceleration A_y and the vehicle speed V: The rotation radius R can be determined from (2) and this can be inserted into the formula for the calculation of the steering angle (3).

As already mentioned, signals which have already been reproduced themselves can be used for the reproduction of particular status signals.

The following three tables give an overview of the strategies on failure of one, two or three status signals.

TABLE 1
Wheel
rotation			Transverse		Brake
speed	Steering	Yaw rate	acceleration	Engine	activation	Algorithm
sensor	angle	sensor	sensor	speed	sensor	status	Sensor Failure Strategy	Formula
Out of	OK	OK	OK	OK	OK	remains	Wheel rotation speed is	Vw = E*D*G
order						active	calculated from engine speed,
							gear ratio and differential gear
							ratio
OK	Out of	OK	OK	OK	OK	remains	Steering angle is calculated	Ay = Vw2/R
	order					active	from transverse acceleration	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							and wheel speed
OK	OK	Out of	OK	OK	OK	remains	Yaw rate calculated from	Ωz = V/R
		order				active	speed and steering angle	δ = L/(R + t/2)
OK	OK	OK	Out of	OK	OK	remains	Transverse acceleration is	Ay = Vw2/R
			order			active	calculated from steering angle	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							and wheel speed
OK	OK	OK	OK	Out of	OK	remain	Is only required if the wheel rotation speed is
				order		active	faulty

TABLE 2
Scenarios when two signals fail:
Wheel
rotation			Transverse		Brake
speed	Steering	Yaw rate	acceleration	Engine	activation	Algorithm
sensor	angle	sensor	sensor	speed	sensor	status	Sensor Failure Strategy	Formula
Out of	Out of	OK	OK	OK	OK	remains	Wheel speed is calculated from	Vw = E*D*G
order	order					active	engine speed, gear ratio and	Ay = Vw2/R
							differential gear ratio.	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							Steering angle is calculated
							from transverse acceleration
							and calculated wheel rotation
							speed.
OK	OK	Out of	Out of	OK	OK	remains	Yaw rate calculated from	Ay = Vw2/R
		order	order			active	speed and steering angle.	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							Transverse acceleration is	Ωz = V/R
							calculated from steering angle
							and wheel speed.
Out of	OK	Out of	OK	OK	OK	remains	Wheel speed is calculated from	Vw = E*D*G
order		order				active	engine speed, gear ratio and	Ωz = V/R
							differential gear ratio. Yaw	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							rate calculated from calculated
							speed and steering angle.
Out of	OK	OK	Out of	OK	OK	remains	Wheel speed is calculated from	Vw = E*D*G
order			order			active	engine speed, gear ratio and	Ay = Vw2/R
							differential gear ratio.	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							Transverse acceleration is
							calculated from steering angle
							and calculated wheel speed.
OK	Out of	Out of	OK	OK	OK	remains	Steering angle is calculated	Ay = Vw2/R
	order	order				active	from transverse acceleration	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							and wheel speed. Yaw rate	Ωz = V/R
							calculated from speed and
							calculated steering angle.
OK	Out of	OK	Out of	OK	OK	remains	Steering angle is calculated	Ay = Vw2/R
	order		order			active	from yaw rate and wheel	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							speed. Transverse acceleration	Ωz= V/R
							is determined from wheel
							speed and calculated steering
							angle.

TABLE 3
Wheel
rotation			Transverse		Brake
speed	Steering	Yaw rate	acceleration	Engine	activation	Algorithm
sensor	angle	sensor	sensor	speed	sensor	status	Sensor Failure Strategy	Formula
Out of	OK	Out of	Out of	OK	OK	remains	Wheel speed is calculated from	Vw = E*D*G
order		order	order			active	engine speed, gear ratio and	Ay = Vw2/R
							differential gear ratio. Yaw	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							rate calculated from calculated	Ωz = V/R
							speed. Steering angle
							transverse acceleration is
							calculated from steering angle
							and calculated wheel speed.
OK	Out of	OK	Out of	Out of	OK	remains	Steering angle is calculated	Ωz = V/R
	Order		order	Order		active	from yaw rate and wheel	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							speed. Transverse acceleration	Ay = Vw2/R
							is calculated from yaw rate and
							wheel speed. Engine speed not
							required.
Out of	Out of	Out of	OK	OK	OK	remains	Wheel speed is calculated from	Vw = E*D*G
order	Order	order				active	engine speed, gear ratio and	Ay = Vw2/R
							differential gear ratio. Steering	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							angle is calculated from	Ωz = V/R
							transverse acceleration and
							calculated wheel speed. Yaw
							rate calculated from speed and
							steering angle.
Out of	Out of	OK	Out of	OK	OK	remains	Wheel speed is calculated from	Vw = E*D*G
order	Order		order			active	engine speed, gear ratio and	Ωz = V/R
							differential gear ratio.	Ay = Vw2/R
							Transverse acceleration is	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							calculated from yaw rate and
							calculated wheel speed.
							Steering angle from yaw rate
							and speed.
Out of	Out of	OK	OK	Out of	OK	remains	Wheel speed is calculated from	Ay = Vw2/R
Order	order			Order		active	transverse acceleration and	Ωz = V/R
							yaw rate. Steering angle is	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							calculated from transverse
							acceleration and calculated
							wheel speed. Engine speed not
							required.
Out of	OK	Out or	OK	Out of	OK	remains	Wheel speed is calculated from	Ay = Vw2/R
order		Order		order		active	steering angle and transverse	δ = L/(R + t/2)
							acceleration. Yaw rate is from	Ωz = V/R
							steering angle and calculated
							wheel speed. Engine speed not
							required.

Claims

1. A method for controlling an active restraint system in a motor vehicle, the method comprising the following steps: providing several status signals, transferring the status signals to a control algorithm as input values, and controlling of the active restraint system according to the result of the control algorithm, characterized by the following steps: checking whether one or more of the status signals have failed, reproducing a failed status signal, and replacing the failed status signal by its reproduction.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein for reproducing the failed status signal, a signal is used which is not provided as an input value for the control algorithm.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein for reproducing the failed status signal, at least one other reproduced status signal is used.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the active restraint system is a reversible belt tensioner system.