The present invention relates to a method for controlling an electric motor fed by a direct-current voltage network, in particular a method for controlling a fan motor which is fed by a motor vehicle power supply system using pulse width modulation and which can be connected to the direct-current voltage network via an actuator in the motor electrical circuit. With methods of this type it is known to protect the actuator—which is typically designed as a semiconductor switching device—of the motor electrical circuit against overload. To this end, a circuit configuration is described, e.g., in DE 34 33 538 C, which—in order to limit the power loss in a power transistor next to the component to be protected against overload—includes a shunt in the load circuit and a further switching element which becomes conductive when impermissibly high currents flow across the power transistor and bridges the control path of the power transistor to reduce the current across its main electrodes. A circuit configuration of this type is complex and costly, however, particularly since it uses an expensive precision resistor as the current measuring shunt.
It is also known in automotive technology to limit the power consumption of directcurrent motors fed by the motor vehicle power supply system via the cycle time of the supply voltage, preferably in the inaudible frequency range above approximately 20 kHz, by limiting the terminal voltage of the motor by changing the pulse-width ratio of its supply voltage. Since the power consumption of a certain motor during normal operation is known, it is also possible to realize a timed ramp of the initial on/off ratio in order to control the start-up of the direct-current motor from a standing start until it has reached its maximum speed. To ensure motor start-up, the initial on/off ratio starts—regardless of the voltage level of the direct-current voltage network at that instant—with a preset on/off ratio, which is then increased in a ramped manner in accordance with the desired acceleration of the motor until an on/off ratio of 100% is reached and, therefore, until the maximum motor speed is reached. The motor then continues to run at this maximum speed. A motor control system of this type does not guarantee reliable start-up of the motor when mains voltage is low. In addition, when mains voltage is high, there is a risk of overload of the electrical components in the circuit, in particular an overload of the output stage in the motor electrical circuit.
The object of the present invention is to ensure reliable start-up of the motor using the simplest circuit means possible, and to optimize the run-up of the motor to its maximum speed in terms of the amount of run-up time required and the resultant power loss at different available levels of supply voltage from the direct-current voltage network.
The aforementioned object is attained according to the present invention via the characterizing features of claim 1. Initially, reliable start-up of the motor is attained and, simultaneously, overload of components, particularly the output stage in the load circuit, is prevented via the starting voltage—the level of which is essentially preset in accordance with the known motor data—at a known level of power consumption. In this operating phase, optimal acceleration of the motor is attained via the timed characteristic curve assignment—which is independent of the mains voltage level—for the increase in the on/off ratio of the pulse-width modulated supply voltage of the motor. At the same time, if the supply voltage in the direct-current voltage network is high, overload is prevented.
The acceleration phase of the motor can be improved even further and power loss reduced when, after motor start-up, the supply voltage is controlled to initially increase steeply, and to then increase less steeply, until the maximum motor speed is reached. The motor therefore quickly reaches higher speeds and, simultaneously, the overall power loss is reduced in the subsequent acceleration range of the motor as the supply voltage and, therefore, the power consumption, increases at a slower rate. The characteristic curve for the control of the supply voltage for the motor is stored in a control unit, preferably in a microcontroller, which also serves to determine the level of the mains voltage of the direct-current voltage network and deliver a corrected, pulse-width modulated control voltage for the actuator in accordance with the predefined characteristic curve for an adjusted, timed change of the supply voltage for the motor.
Further details and advantageous embodiments of the inventive method result from the description of a circuit configuration for implementing the method, and from the associated voltage and current curves.
Electric motor 10 is controlled by a control unit 24 in the form of a microcontroller; the following components are shown in the block diagram in
The circuit configuration depicted in the block diagram in
A variable direct-current voltage UB, as is used, e.g., in the motor vehicle power supply system, is supplied at connections 14 and 20. The voltage fluctuations of a power supply system of this type with a nominal direct-current voltage of 12 V are between operating voltage values of 9 V and 16 V, depending on the state of charge and the floating state of a battery connected thereto, and depending on other operating and ambient conditions. The objective is to compensate these voltage fluctuations to the greatest extent possible according to the present invention. To this end, mains direct-current voltage UB is tapped between two connections 38 and 40 by control unit 24 and is converted in A/D converter 26 into a digital signal for further use. Start-up of motor 10 is initiated by a start signal 33 at control input 32 of the control unit. With this start signal, a preset starting voltage for the start-up of motor 10 appears at output 34 of control unit 24 for an initial short time period 0-t1. The level of the starting voltage and the subsequent control voltages for actuator 18 are determined by the on/off ratio of PWM control 30. PWM control 30 therefore determines the ON period of actuator 18 and, therefore, the magnitude of motor current I. The shape of the characteristic curves over time will be described in greater detail with reference to
When the first, short time period 0-t1 with direct-current voltage supply to motor 10 ends, the on/off ratio of the control voltage is increased preferably linearly, and this increase is selected depending on the level of mains direct-current voltage UB that was measured such that, after a second time period t1-t2, a predefined level of supply voltage UB for motor 10 is attained, which is still far below operating voltage U3 of motor 10, however.
In a third time interval t2-t3, the on/off ratio of the control voltage for actuator 18 is also increased further in a preferably linear manner, but with a shallower slope as compared with the previous section, until operating voltage U3 for the non-stop operation of motor 10 is reached. The level of this voltage in non-stop operation is also preferably limited via the selection of the on/off ratio of the control voltage to a fixed value, e.g., a voltage value of 14 V in a 12 V motor vehicle power supply system. If this value is not attained, due to a lower mains voltage UB, an on/off ratio of 100% determines the level of the supply voltage of motor 10. If mains voltage UB is adequately, high, however, it is also possible to permit a higher non-stop operation voltage of motor 10, e.g., a supply voltage UB of 16 V when the aim is to attain even greater motor output.
The inventive method for the timed, voltage fluctuation-compensating control of a direct-current motor 10 in the form described above influences the level of the motor current only via the magnitude of the increase in the supply voltage. An impermissibly high current increase, which can occur, e.g., if the motor seizes or becomes sluggish, is not taken into consideration initially. This problem is generally known, however, and is solved, e.g., using the circuit configuration described in DE 103 26 785 A, with which the increase in motor current and its absolute level are monitored and can be limited as necessary, also with the aid of a sense FET that serves as actuator 18. Current limitation of this type can also be used with the subject of the application in addition to the inventive control, and the measurement accuracy that can be attained in a sense FET is at least adequate for monitoring the motor current in the overload or blocked state. In addition, in the normal operation of motor 10 described above, the change gradient of the supply voltages for the motor is predefined and is designed to attain certain voltage values U1, U2, U3 at predefined points in time t1, t2, t3. Instead, with the inventive method and with the aid of a sense FET used as actuator 18, it is also possible, by measuring the motor current, to adjust the change gradients of the supply voltages depending on the measurements of motor current I at certain points in time, or permanently.
Motor current I that flows when a supply voltage UM is supplied to motor 10 as depicted in
The block diagram—shown in FIG. 1—of a motor control for carrying out the inventive control method for an electric motor 10 supplied by a direct-current voltage network with fluctuating voltage UB does not show the usual, additional components, such as inductance coils and capacitors for eliminating interference, nor does it depict how the circuit provides protection against mispolarization if connected incorrectly to the direct-current voltage network. To simplify the depiction, known measures for protecting motor 10 if it seizes or becomes sluggish are not depicted, nor are known assemblies of control unit 24, e.g., a resonator for generating the clock frequency for pulse-width modulator 30, or the like.
Since electric motors of the type of interest do not start up until a certain minimum voltage is applied, it is known to supply this minimum voltage to the motor immediately upon start-up. In deviation from known controls, however, with the inventive method, a minimum voltage that is required for reliable start-up of the motor is defined, independently of the mains voltage at that point in time. This minimum voltage is held constant for a predefined period of time, before at least one timed, preferably linear ramp of supply voltage UM—corresponding to an on/off ratio of the control voltage that depends on the level of direct-current voltage supply UB at that instant—is supplied to the motor. This supply voltage UM to motor 10 can be realized using software via microcontroller control unit 24 with little effort, by changing the on/off ratio. Initially, therefore, the starting voltage is therefore provided, at a constant level, for the period of time 0-t1 by measuring mains voltage UB and by adjusting the on/off ratio of the control voltage for actuator 18 in a manner dependent thereon. To allow for seizure detection, it is permissible to include waiting periods for error detection and response during this period of time, when the starting voltage is not increased. If a blocking current occurs at a known level that does not exceed a value that is permissible for the output stage of actuator 18, this can be put up with. Due to the specified level and duration of supply voltage U1 at start-up of motor 10, the stiction that occurs at start-up is reliably overcome. In addition, a faster motor run-up can be realized when mains voltages are low. As a result, when supply voltages U2-U3 of motor 10 are high, motor current I and, therefore, the end-stage load for a given run-up time becomes excessive.
By providing two different ramps of supply voltage UM, the second of which has a shallower slope in the range between t2 and t3 than the first ramp in the range from t1 to t2, the motor current has relatively few fluctuations and deviations from a linear increase. In particular, a strong increase in the current curve is avoided in the range of high currents and voltages and, therefore, power loss is reduced overall.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102005024068.2 | May 2005 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP06/61627 | 4/18/2006 | WO | 00 | 7/1/2009 |