This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from the prior Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-257229, filed on Sep. 22, 2006, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a method for controlling a bidirectional DC-DC converter, and more particularly, to a method for controlling a bidirectional DC-DC converter capable of reducing switching loss and conduction loss through execution of a simple switching control.
“Bidirectional DC-DC Converter for Super Capacitor-Based Energy Storage Systems” by Tomokazu Mishima et al., The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers Technical Report of IEICE, EE2005-35 (2005-9), P. 19-24 (hereinafter referred to as “non-patent document 1”) discloses a bidirectional DC-DC converter.
The bidirectional DC-DC converter disclosed in non-patent document 1 has a primary side configured by a half bridge converter, which is formed by a MOSFET, and a secondary side configured by a current push-pull inverter. The DC-DC converter performs voltage adjustment with a constant voltage power supply such as a battery that functions as a main power supply E1 at the high voltage primary side, and a variable voltage source such as a super capacitor arranged at the low voltage secondary side and having terminal voltage that varies in accordance with the stored energy amount.
Non-patent document 1 considers the application of a bidirectional DC-DC converter to an auxiliary power supply for an electric vehicle (EV) or the like. In this case, a capacitor charging operation is performed to mainly regenerate energy for the main power supply E1 and absorb surplus power. Thus, the capacitor charging operation requires an increased energy transmission efficiency rather than a quick response.
Accordingly, when charging the capacitor, each switch element of the half bridge and push-pull circuits always operates at a constant maximum duty (about 50%). The capacitor voltage rises at a rate determined by a time constant resulting from an inductance value of the secondary side coil and a capacitance value of the capacitor. When the capacitor performs a discharging operation, the voltage applied to the primary side power supply E1 is adjusted by adjusting the overlapping ON-time of the plurality of switches in the push-pull circuit in accordance with the capacitor voltage.
Non-patent document 1 describes controlling of the switch elements in the half bridge circuit so that the maximum duty becomes 50% when charging the capacitor. Thus, in the bidirectional DC-DC converter of non-patent document 1, the activation time for two switch elements in the half bridge circuit are set to be the same, and PWM control is executed so that the switch elements are alternately activated.
In non-patent document 1, the switching duty when each switch element of the half bridge circuit is controlled is fixed at the maximum duty of 50%. This minimizes the dead time between the two switch elements. However, the two switch elements may be controlled at a switching duty that differs from 50% depending on the voltage condition of the primary side power supply E1 and the secondary side super capacitor. This may prolong the duration of the dead time.
During the duration of the dead time, current flowing due to the activation of the switch elements in the push-pull circuit continues to flow through an antiparallel diode. When the current flows through the antiparallel diode, the conduction loss increases as compared to when the current flows to the switch elements.
Since the duration of the dead time varies in accordance with the voltage conditions, the control of a soft switching operation cannot be performed at a predetermined timing. Thus, a hard switching operation must be performed for the switch elements of the half bridge circuit. Therefore, switching loss cannot be reduced.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for controlling a bidirectional DC-DC converter capable of reducing switching loss during a step-down operation and reducing conduction loss during synchronous rectification, while enabling bidirectional operation with the same control.
One aspect of the present invention relates to a method for controlling a bidirectional DC-DC converter for selectively performing a step-down operation and a step-up operation. The bidirectional DC-DC converter includes a transformer, which has a high-voltage side winding and a low-voltage side winding. Alternately activated first and second switch elements are connected to the high-voltage side winding in order to alternately apply high voltage in opposite directions to the high-voltage side winding during the step-down operation and full-wave rectify current that is output from the high-voltage side winding by performing synchronous rectification during the step-up operation. First and second antiparallel diodes are respectively connected to the first and second switch elements. First and second capacitors are respectively connected in parallel to the first and second switch elements. Third and fourth switch elements are connected to the low-voltage side winding and activated in accordance with the active state of the first and second switch elements for full-wave rectifying current that is output from the low-voltage side winding by performing synchronous rectification during the step-down operation and alternately applying low voltage in opposite directions to the low-voltage side winding during the step-up operation. Third and fourth antiparallel diodes are respectively connected to the third and fourth switch elements. An inductance element is arranged in a path extending from the low-voltage side winding to the low voltage. The method includes activating the third switch element, activating the first switch element when the third switch element is in an active state, activating the fourth switch element, activating the second switch element when the third switch element is in an active state, and switching each of the third and fourth switch elements between an active state and an inactive state while inactivating the first and second switch elements for a predetermined time and activating at least one of the third and the fourth switch elements.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the invention.
The invention, together with objects and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description of the presently preferred embodiments together with the accompanying drawings in which:
A method for controlling a bidirectional DC-DC converter 10 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to FIGS. 1 to 18.
The bidirectional DC-DC converter 10 has the following configuration. A reference terminal (terminal marked by black dot in
The source terminal of the MOS transistor Q1 and the other terminal of the capacitor C1 are both connected to a negative pole of the high voltage EH, and the drain terminal of the MOS transistor Q2 and the other terminal of the capacitor C2 are both connected to a positive pole of the high voltage EH.
The MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 respectively include antiparallel diodes D1 and D2. Furthermore, capacitors CP1 and CP2 are connected in parallel to the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2, respectively.
The low voltage EL side of the transformer T includes two low voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 with an intermediate tap in between. The intermediate tap connects a reference terminal (terminal marked by black dot in
In the preferred embodiment, the bidirectional DC-DC converter 10 is capable of performing both the step-down operation and the step-up operation with the same switching control. In such switching control, eight switching states (1) to (8), which are described below, are sequentially repeated.
In switching state (1), the gate voltage VGQ1 of the MOS transistor Q1 and the gate voltage VGQr1 of the MOS transistor Qr1 are set to a high level. Therefore, the MOS transistors Q1 and Qr1 are both activated.
In switching state (2), the gate voltage VGQ1 of the MOS transistor Q1 is set to a low level while the gate voltage VGQr1 of the MOS transistor Qr1 is maintained at a high level. That is, the MOS transistor Q1 is inactivated while the MOS transistor Qr1 remains activated.
In switching state (3), the gate voltage VGQr2 of the MOS transistor Qr2 is set to a high level while the gate voltage VGQr1 of the MOS transistor Qr1 is maintained at a high level. That is, the MOS transistor Qr2 is activated while the MOS transistor Qr1 remains activated.
In switching state (4), the gate voltage VGQr1 of the MOS transistor Qr1 is set to a low level while the gate voltage VGQr2 of the MOS transistor Qr2 is maintained at a high level. In other words, the MOS transistor Qr1 is set inactivated while the MOS transistor Qr2 remains activated.
The duration of switching state (3) may be short so that switching state (2) quickly shifts to switching state (4). That is, the gate voltage VGQr2 of the MOS transistor Qr2 may shift to a high level at substantially the same time as when the gate voltage VGQr1 of the MOS transistor Qr1 shifts to a low level. In this case, the MOS transistor Qr2 is activated at substantially the same time as when the MOS transistor Qr1 is inactivated.
In switching state (5), the gate voltage VGQ2 of the MOS transistor Q2 and the gate voltage VGQr2 of the MOS transistor Qr2 are set to a high level. Therefore, the MOS transistors Q2 and Qr2 are both activated.
In switching state (6), the gate voltage VGQ2 of the MOS transistor Q2 is set to a low level while the gate voltage VGQr2 of the MOS transistor Qr2 is maintained at high level. That is, the MOS transistor Q2 is inactivated while the MOS transistor Qr2 remains activated.
In switching state (7), the gate voltage VGQr1 of the MOS transistor Qr1 is set to a high level while the gate voltage VGQr2 of the MOS transistor Qr2 is maintained at a high level. That is, the MOS transistor Qr1 is set to the activated while the MOS transistor Qr2 remains activated.
In switching state (8), the gate voltage VGQr2 of the MOS transistor Qr2 is set to a low level while the gate voltage VGQr1 of the MOS transistor Qr1 is maintained at a high level. That is, the MOS transistor Qr2 is set inactivated while the MOS transistor Qr1 remains activated.
The duration of switching state (7) may be short so that switching state (6) quickly shifts to switching state (8). That is, the gate voltage VGQr1 of the MOS transistor Qr1 may shift to a high level at substantially the same time as the timing at which the gate voltage VGQr2 of the MOS transistor Qr2 shifts to a low level. In this case, the MOS transistor Qr1 shifts to the active state at substantially the same time as when the MOS transistor Qr2 shifts to the inactive state.
In the switching control of
The bidirectional DC-DC converter 10 of
First, the step-down operation will be described.
In
After the commutation operation starts, the MOS transistor Qr2 becomes active state to shift to the switching state (3). The transformer T is still in the commutation operation period. Thus, electromotive force is not induced between the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2. The output current that flows to the inductance element LO when the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are both active flows to the two low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2. Thereafter, the current path sequentially switches from the low-voltage side winding LL1 to the low-voltage side winding LL2. In this case, the current path is switched such that the current flowing to the inductance element LO, which functions as an output coil, is continuous.
Subsequently, the operation shifts to switching state (4) in
The transition timing to the inactive state of the MOS transistor Qr1 is preferably a period in which the commutation operation of the transistor T is being performed. Electromotive force is not induced between the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 during the commutation operation. Thus, the excitation voltage is induced when the commutation operation is completed. However, if the MOS transistor Qr1 is in the active state in addition to the MOS transistor Qr2 after the commutation operation is completed, current may flow to the low voltage EL due to the excitation voltage since the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 are in a short-circuited state.
The shifting of the MOS transistor Qr2 to the active state and the shifting of the MOS transistor Qr1 to the inactive state may occur at the same time as long as the commutation operation is being performed. This is because current flows via the antiparallel diodes Dr1 and Dr2 even if the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are inactive.
Thereafter, current flows from the high voltage EH to the capacitors C1 and C2 via the MOS transistor Q2 and the high-voltage side winding LH. As a result, high voltage is applied to the reference terminal of the high-voltage side winding LH, and excitation starts in the opposite direction of the transformer T. Thus, current flows from the reference terminal of the low-voltage side winding LL2 to the low voltage EL via the inductance element LO. In this state, the MOS transistor Qr2 is in the active state and functions as a synchronous rectification element.
After the commutation operation starts, the operation state shifts to switching state (7) as the MOS transistor Qr1 becomes active. Since the transformer T is still performing the commutation operation, electromotive force is not induced between the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2. The output current that flows to the inductance element LO when the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are both active flows to both of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2. Thereafter, the current path sequentially switches from the low-voltage side winding LL2 to the low-voltage side winding LL1. In this case, the current path is switched such that current continuously flows to the inductance element LO, which functions as an output coil.
The operation state then shifts to switching state (8) shown in
The timing for shifting to the inactive state of the MOS transistor Qr2 is preferably the period during which the transistor T is performing the commutation operation. As long as the commutation operation is being performed, electromotive force is not induced between the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2. Thus, excitation voltage is induced when the commutation operation is completed. However, if the MOS transistor Qr2 is in the active state in addition to the MOS transistor Qr1 after the commutation operation is completed, current may flow to the low voltage EL due to the excitation voltage since the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 are in a short-circuited state.
The shifting of the MOS transistor Qr1 to the active state and the shifting of the MOS transistor Qr2 to the inactive state may occur at the same time as long as the commutation operation is being performed. This is because the current flows via the antiparallel diodes Dr1 and Dr2 even if the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are inactive.
In switching state (1), the gate voltage VCQ1 is at high level and the gate voltage VCQ2 is at low level. Therefore, the MOS transistor Q1 is in the active state, and the MOS transistor Q2 is in the inactive state. In the high-voltage side winding LH, an inter-terminal voltage VLH (curve shown with sold line in
When the gate voltage VGQ1 shifts to a low level and the MOS transistor Q1 shifts to the inactive state, the operation state becomes switching state (2). As a result, the inter-terminal voltages VLH, VLH0 of the high-voltage side winding LH decrease and eventually the inter-terminal voltages VLH, VLH0 of the high-voltage side winding LH related to the excitation voltage become 0 V ((A) in
The operation then shifts to switching states (3) and (4). Excitation voltage is not applied to the transformer T ((B) in
When the inter-terminal voltage VLH reaches the minimum value, the potential at the reference terminal of the high-voltage side winding LH becomes maximum and the inter-terminal voltage between the drain and the source terminals of the MOS transistor Q2 becomes minimum. A soft switching operation may be performed by switching the MOS transistor Q2 at this point. The time from the start of LC resonance until the inter-terminal voltage VLH reaches the minimum value is known to be substantially one fourth the cycle of the LC resonance.
The total time of the period (A) in which the excitation voltage of the transformer decreases and the period (B) of substantially one fourth the cycle of the LC resonance performed between the leakage inductance component and the capacitors CP1 and CP2 by electromagnetic energy remaining in the leakage inductance component of the high-voltage side winding LH corresponds to the dead time of the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2. An asymmetric PWM operation is performed in the step-down operation while maintaining the dead time. Therefore, the dead time of the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 is fixed to a predetermined time, and the shifting of the active state of the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 may be performed by the soft switching operation.
In the step-down operation of the preferred embodiment, activation and inactivation of each MOS transistor Qr1 and Qr2 arranged on the low-voltage EL side of the transformer T is controlled in accordance with the active state of the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 arranged at the high-voltage EH side of the transformer T. Thus, the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 can function as synchronous rectification elements. The MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 output smoothed low-voltage EL by full-wave rectifying current at the low voltage EL side and continuously generating the output current that flows to the inductance element LO.
When the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2, which achieve a synchronous rectification function, is switched between the active state and the inactive state, the period in which both MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are in the inactive state is not provided. Current constantly flows to the MOS transistor Qr1 or Qr2. However, current does not flow to the antiparallel diode Dr1 and Dr2. Therefore, the conduction loss of the low voltage EL is reduced.
The dead time period in which both MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 are in the inactive state is fixed to the time of (A) and (C) in
Furthermore, the timing of switching the active state and the inactive state of each MOS transistor Qr1 and Qr2 is set within a period in which the transformer T performs the commutation operation in accordance with the shifting to the inactive state of the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2. The excitation voltage is not induced at the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 during the commutation operation period of the transformer T. Thus, unnecessary current does not flow to the terminals of the windings LL1 and LL2 even if the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 become short-circuited in the period in which the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are both in the activation state when switching to the activate state and the inactive state of each MOS transistor Qr1 and Qr2. Therefore, the switching of the current path between the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 is smoothly carried out.
The timing for shifting the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 to the inactive state is set, at the latest, to the timing the transformer T completes the commutation operation in accordance with the shifting of the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 to the inactive state. Thus, the period in which MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are both in the active state is within a period during which the transformer T performs the commutation operation. That is, the voltage is not induced between the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 when the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are both active and the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 are short-circuited. Accordingly, unnecessary current does not flow.
The dead time period during which the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 are both in the inactive state is the time from when the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 shift to the inactive state until when the voltage between the drain and the source terminals of the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 becomes minimum, due to the LC resonance of the leakage inductance of the high-voltage side winding LH, and the capacitors CP1 and CP2 becomes minimum in the commutation operation of the transformer T. Thus the energy stored in the leakage inductance in the high-voltage side winding LH is LC resonated between the leakage inductance and the capacitors CP1 and CP2. Then, the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 is shifted to the active state. Therefore, the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 may be controlled by the soft switching operation.
If the dead time of the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 is divided substantially by one half into the resolving period of the excitation voltage of the transformer T and the commutation period resulting from the LC resonance of the leakage inductance and the capacitors CP1 and CP2, the timing for switching the MOS transistor Q1 and Q2 between the active state and the inactive state is set to a timing that is substantially in the middle of the dead time of the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2.
The step-up operation will now be described with reference to FIGS. 12 to 15.
If the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are both in an active state (switching state (3)), the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 are in a short-circuit state. Since there is no application of excitation voltage to the transformer T, electromotive force is not induced between the terminals of the high-voltage side winding LH. Therefore, the current of switching state (2) (
When the MOS transistor Qr1 shifts to the inactive state (switching state (4)), the current flowing to the inductance element LO continuously flows from the low-voltage side winding LL1 to the low-voltage side winding LL2 at the low voltage EL side. This reverses the excitation direction of the transformer T, and the reference terminal of the high-voltage side winding LH becomes high voltage. Therefore, current flows in a direction for charging the capacitor C2 through the antiparallel diode D2 of the MOS transistor Q2.
The timing of switching state (5) at which the MOS transistor Q2 shifts to the active state must be at least after the recovery time of the diode D1 elapses from when inverse bias is applied to the antiparallel diode D1 of the MOS transistor Q1 in the immediately previous switching state (4). This is because through current flows from the MOS transistor Q2 through the antiparallel diode D1 if the MOS transistor Q2 shifts to the active state before the recovery time elapses.
Specifically, the time from when the MOS transistor Qr1 shifts to the inactive state (switching state (3) and (4)) to the timing the MOS transistor Q2 shifts to the active state (switching state (5)) is preferably longer than or equal to the recovery time of the antiparallel diode D1.
If the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are both in the active state (switching state (7)), the terminals of the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 are in a short-circuit state. Since there is no application of excitation voltage to the transformer T, electromotive force is not induced between the terminals of the high-voltage side winding LH. Therefore, the current of switching state (6) (
When the MOS transistor Qr2 shifts to the inactive state (switching state (8)), the current flowing to the inductance element LO continuously shifts from the low-voltage side winding LL2 to the low-voltage side winding LL1 on the low voltage EL side. This reverses the excitation direction of the transformer T, and the voltage at the non-reference terminal of the high-voltage side winding LH becomes high. Therefore, the current flows in the direction for charging the capacitor C1 through the antiparallel diode D1 of the MOS transistor Q1 (state similar to
In the step-up operation of the preferred embodiment, a period in which the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 both become inactive states is not provided when the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are shifted from the active states. Thus, voltage is continuously applied to the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 of the transformer T. Therefore, the generation of surge voltage is suppressed, and voltage of inverse bias is stably and alternately applied. The voltage applied to the low-voltage side windings LL1 and LL2 is generated by a continuous path current flowing to the inductance element LO and increased from the low voltage EL.
The time from when the MOS transistor Qr2 shifts to the inactive state to when the MOS transistor Q1 shifts to the active state is set to at least the recovery time of the antiparallel diode D2 of the MOS transistor Q2. The time from when the MOS transistor Qr1 shifts to the inactive state to when the MOS transistor Q2 shifts to the active state is set to at least the recovery time of the antiparallel diode D1 of the MOS transistor Q1. Therefore, through current does not flow through the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2, which are shifted to the active state, and the antiparallel diodes D1 and D2.
The step-down operation in which power is transmitted from the high voltage EH to the low voltage EL via the transformer T and the step-up operation in which power is transmitted from the low voltage EL to the high voltage EH via the transformer T are both performed at the timings of switching control shown in
The MOS transistors Q1, Q2, Qr1, and Qr2 are examples of first to fourth switch elements, and capacitors CP1 and CP2 are examples of first and second capacitors.
FIGS. 16 to 18 are diagrams of further circuits to which the switching timing shown in
As described above in detail, the method for controlling the bidirectional DC-DC converter in the preferred embodiment controls the step-down operation and the step-up operation at the same switching control timing. This simplifies the control.
In the step-down operation, the dead time is fixed to a predetermined time by executing the asymmetric PWM control on the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2 on the high voltage EH side. Thus, the soft switching operation can be performed on the MOS transistors Q1 and Q2, and switching loss is reduced.
Furthermore, a period in which the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 on the low voltage EL side are both in the inactive state does not exist for the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2. Thus, when the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 perform synchronous rectification operation in the step-down operation, the period in which the current flows to the antiparallel diodes Dr1 and Dr2 becomes short. This reduces the conduction loss.
In the step-up operation, at least one of the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 is maintained in the active state. Thus, the current flowing from the inductance element LO to the low-voltage side winding LL1 and LL2 does not become discontinuous. This prevents the generation of surge voltage when shifting from active states.
It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Particularly, it should be understood that the present invention may be embodied in the following forms.
The MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 respectively include the antiparallel diodes Dr1 and Dr2 in the preferred embodiment. However, the antiparallel diodes Dr1 and Dr2 may be omitted. That is, in the present invention, there is no period during which the MOS transistors Qr1 and Qr2 are both in the inactive state. Thus, the antiparallel diodes Dr1 and Dr2 are not necessarily required.
The present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalence of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006-257229 | Sep 2006 | JP | national |