Patent Grant
8235230
The present invention relates to the technical field of tower cranes. More specifically, this invention relates to the motorized control of the slewing movement of the rotary upper part of a tower crane.
A tower crane is usually made up of two main parts, these being, on the one hand, a non-rotating vertical pylon also known as the “mast” and, on the other hand, a rotary upper part, that is to say a part that can be slewed about a vertical axis of rotation. The rotary upper part, mounted at the top of the mast, is itself made up of a jib, which extends on one side of the vertical axis of rotation of this rotary part, and of a counterweighted counterjib, which extends on the other side of the vertical axis of rotation. The rotation of the rotary part about this vertical axis is controlled by a motorized unit, using electrical power, and hereinafter known by the expression “electric slewing mechanism”.
In order for the rotary part to be mounted such that it can rotate at the top of the mast of a tower crane there is usually, between the jib and counterjib of the rotary part, a slewing ring made up of two concentric races, with a fixed race connected to the top of the mast and a mobile race secured to the rotary part, between which races balls or cylindrical rollers are mounted such that they can roll.
To control the rotation of the rotary part thus mounted, the electric slewing mechanism usually comprises a geared electric motor unit secured to this rotary part, which geared motor unit turns a vertical-axis pinion which meshes with a gear wheel cut into the fixed race of the slewing ring. Where a great deal of mechanical power has to be transmitted in order to set the rotary part in rotation, two or more geared motor units may be provided, each geared motor unit turning one pinion in mesh with one and the same gear wheel.
By way of examples of such slewing mechanisms, reference is made to patent documents EP 1 422 188 and FR 2 907 109.
When the tower crane is “not in use”, that is to say outside of the periods of operation of the crane, the crane is usually set to “weathervane”: the rotary part is no longer braked in terms of rotation, or is so only to a reduced extent, which means that it can slew freely at any time, according to the wind direction. The jib therefore slews downwind, while the counterjib positions itself upwind, because the area of the jib exposed to the wind is very much higher than that of the counterjib.
During periods in which the tower crane is in operation, it is subjected to fatigue cycles as a result in particular of the alternating rotations of the rotary part in one direction, under load, and “unladen” return journeys made by this rotary part. The mast of the crane is therefore subjected to torque loadings which need to be limited to a maximum torque value that this mast can withstand.
To this end, the electric slewing mechanism of the crane is controlled by a computer which limits the value of the slewing toque to the maximum torque value that has been predefined.
It should also be noted that, during crane operating periods, the rotary part of this crane and, in particular, the jib, presents significant windage, particularly when set into motion, it being possible for the effect of the wind to result in additional resistive torque.
The torque limit imposed by the computer, combined with the resistive torque due to the wind, makes it potentially difficult for the crane driver to control the rotation and positioning of the jib, particularly the movement of the jib under load, in the presence of a wind particularly if the windspeed is above a certain threshold value.
Patent FR 1 544 012 describes a control of the slewing movement of a tower crane (without a counterjib) in which, in order to overcome a resistive torque due to a strong wind, provision is made for the actuation of an auxiliary geared motor unit, which acts on the gear wheel of the slewing mechanism, in addition to the main geared motor unit. The addition of a second geared motor unit, for occasional use, adds complexity and cost.
The present invention aims to avoid these disadvantages and intends to make a tower crane easier to drive, in terms of improving the control of the slewing movement of the rotary part of the crane in the presence of wind, and to do so in a way that is simple and, in particular, does not involve adding an auxiliary geared motor unit.
To this end, the subject of the invention is, essentially, a method for the motorized control of the slewing movement of the rotary upper part of a tower crane, the rotary part being made up of a jib and of a counterjib and this rotary part being associated with an electric slewing mechanism comprising at least one geared electric motor unit with an electric motor and reduction gearbox, of which the electric motor is electrically powered in such a way as to produce a slewing torque transmitted to the rotary part of the crane, this torque having a maximum value, this method being characterized in that, when the crane is in use and for conditions comprising at least one windspeed greater than a given value, the maximum value of the slewing torque that can be produced by the aforementioned electric motor is increased as long as those conditions prevail.
Advantageously, the maximum value of the slewing torque is increased in the event of a windspeed greater than a given value and for at least one additional condition consisting of the fact that the length of the jib of the crane is greater than a given value and/or that the moment of the load suspended from the jib is greater than a given value or than a given fraction of the maximum permissible moment.
If these conditions are met, then the method of the invention in particular makes the provision that the slewing torque may be increased, within the limits of the increased maximum value thus authorized, as a function of the angular position of the jib and of the wind direction, particularly so as to increase the driving torque of the geared motor unit in phases during which the jib is adopting a “windward trend”.
By way of an example of one implementation of the method of the invention, the conditions that all have to be present in order for the maximum value of the slewing torque to be increased may be:
It is specified that, here, “moment of the load” means the product of the weight of the load lifted by the crane, times the span which is the horizontal distance between this load and the mast of the crane (or the axis of rotation of the rotary part).
The various parameters taken into consideration in the method of the invention are provided by appropriate sensors and/or by calculation. In particular, as far as the moment of the load is concerned, this can be obtained by calculation, from the weight of the load as given by a strain gauge-based proving ring, and from the span measured by a potentiometer located on the winch used to move the trolley along the jib. It is also possible to use a moment sensor which directly provides the moment of the load by measuring the displacement of torsion bars.
By virtue of the method of the invention, the maximum value of the torque that can be supplied by the motor of the electric slewing mechanism is increased for example by 15% when the conditions defined hereinabove are simultaneously present. The mechanism then becomes capable of delivering greater torque, provided that the crane driver demands a speed setpoint that is such that this higher torque must be attained. No auxiliary geared motor unit is required.
However, it is necessary to avoid continuous use of such an increased torque value, because of the problems, explained hereinabove, associated with fatigue of the mast structure. Inappropriate use such as this could, for example, result from the user disconnecting the connection between one output from a computer processing the information from the sensors in order to give the authorization to increase the torque, on the one hand, and one input to an actuator such as a frequency variator which controls the electric motor of the electric slewing mechanism, on the other hand. Accordingly, the method of the invention advantageously further comprises a comparison between the status of the input to the actuator, such as a frequency variator, and the command given by the computer, and in the event that the status of this input does not correspond to the command given by the computer, there is an automatic switching of the electric slewing mechanism into downgraded mode, for example by reducing its speed.
Another subject of the invention is a device for implementing the method defined hereinabove, in a device for the motorized control of the slewing movement of the rotary upper part of a tower crane, this device comprising, in the generally known way, an electric slewing mechanism comprising at least one geared electric motor unit with an electric motor and reduction gearbox, of which the electric motor is electrically powered in such a way as to produce a slewing torque transmitted to the rotary part of the crane, this torque having a maximum value, an actuator such as a frequency variator being provided for controlling the motor of the electric slewing mechanism, this device being characterized in that it comprises a computer provided with inputs that allow it to determine the windspeed and other parameters such as the length of the jib of the crane and the moment of the load suspended from the jib, and with an output which is connected to one input of the actuator, such as a frequency variator, and which is able to deliver to this actuator, as a function of the parameters processed, a command authorizing an increase in the maximum value of the slewing torque.
By virtue of these specific arrangements, the device of the invention makes it possible, for brief periods, to increase the torque of the motor of the electric slewing mechanism, driven by the frequency variator, in order to make the crane easier to drive when a wind of a certain strength is present.
The invention will be better understood from the description which follows, with reference to the attached schematic drawing which, by way of example, depicts one embodiment of this device for controlling the slewing movement of the rotary part of a tower crane:
With reference to
The rotary part 3 of the crane is made up of a jib 7 directed “forwards” and of a counterjib 8 aligned with the jib 7 but directed in the opposite direction, that is to say “backwards”, it being possible for this rotary part 3 to be slewed about a vertical axis A which coincides with the central axis of the mast 2. The jib 7 acts as a runway for a jib trolley 9, under which there hangs a lifting hook 10 to which a load C can be hooked. Thus, the load C can be moved in a horizontal movement known as “trolleying” (arrow D) and also in a vertical lifting movement (arrow H). The counterjib 8 is equipped, at the rear, with a counterweight 11 which at least partially balances the weight of the jib 7 and of the load C lifted by the hook 10.
Referring also to
According to the invention, and as shown by
A first input 22 of the computer 21 is connected to an anemometer 26 carried by the crane, and which thus supplies the computer 21 with a signal V representative of the windspeed in the immediate surroundings of the crane.
A second input 23 of the computer 21 is connected to a sensor 27 which indicates the span L, that is to say the horizontal distance between the jib trolley 9, and therefore the load C, on the one hand, and the vertical axis A, on the other hand.
A third input 24 of the computer 21 is connected to a proving ring 28 of the strain gauge 29 type, positioned on a pulley supporting the lifting cable, and which supplies a signal representing the weight P of the load C suspended from the lifting hook 10.
Hence, the computer 21 determines the instantaneous windspeed and at the same time calculates the moment of the load, as the product of the span L and of the weight P of the load C, in other words by multiplying the signal L received at the second input 23 by the signal P received at the third input 24.
The computer 21 also “knows” the parameter that is the total length Lf of the jib 7 on which the wind the speed of which has been measured acts.
The computer 21 can thus perform a logic operation illustrated symbolically in
If all of these three conditions are met at the same time then the output 25 of the computer 21 delivers a signal S authorizing operation at an increased maximum slewing torque, for example at a torque increased by 15% over the usual maximum value. This authorization signal S is carried to one input of the frequency variator 19 which controls the respective electric motors 16 of the geared motor units 15.
To control the geared motor units 15, the computer 21 can also take two further parameters into consideration, these being the instantaneous angular position (angle “alpha 1”) of the jib 7, and the wind direction (angle “alpha 2”). The angular position “alpha 1” of the jib 7 may be provided by a slewing sensor associated with the electric slewing mechanism 12, such as the sensor described in the aforementioned patent document FR 2 907 109. The wind direction “alpha 2” is indicated by a specific sensor of the “weathervane” kind installed on the crane.
The computer 21 is thus able, by comparing the angular orientation “alpha 1” of the jib 7 with the direction of the wind “alpha 2”, to determine whether a commanded rotation of the jib 7 corresponds to a windward trend requiring a higher motor torque. If the authorization to increase the maximum value of the slewing torque is present (i.e. if all of the aforementioned conditions are simultaneously met), then a command in the form of the signal S is emitted and the motor torque can thus actually be increased in phases in which the jib has a windward trend. This control is coupled with regulating the speed and, in particular, the speed setpoint imposed by the crane driver.
In addition, in order to avoid continuous use of a torque value increased in this way, the status of the input to the frequency variator 19 is constantly monitored, by a feedback connection 30, to ensure that this input has not been disconnected by the user. If the status of this input does not correspond to the command S given at the output 25 from the computer 21, then the electric slewing mechanism 12 is automatically switched by the computer 21 into a downgraded mode. In particular, the computer 21 then sends a special speed setpoint Vc to another input of the frequency variator 19 to impose a reduction in speed for the movement of slewing the rotary part 3 of the crane.
The following would not constitute departures from the scope of the invention as defined in the attached claims:
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08 02785 | May 2008 | FR | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3559022 | Tax | Jan 1971 | A |
| 5492067 | Anderson | Feb 1996 | A |
| 6631300 | Nayfeh et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6634514 | Ducrot | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 7515389 | Kleine et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7599762 | Discenzo et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7672768 | Narisawa et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 20050017867 | Shaw et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2340171 | Feb 1975 | DE |
| 26 18 388 | Nov 1977 | DE |
| 0 691 301 | Jan 1996 | EP |
| 1422188 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1191952 | Oct 1959 | FR |
| 1544012 | Oct 1968 | FR |
| 2907109 | Apr 2006 | FR |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100006530 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |
