The present invention relates to negative yarn-feeders for textile machines, and more particularly to a method for controlling the tension of the yarn unwinding from the yarn-feeder and to an apparatus for carrying out such method.
As known, the so-called “negative” yarn-feeders comprise a stationary drum on which a motorized swivel flywheel winds a plurality of yarn loops forming a weft reserve or stock. Upon request from the textile machine, the loops are unwound from the drum, then pass through a weft-braking device which controls the tension of the yarn, and finally are fed to the machine which, with regard to the present invention, preferably consists of a circular/rectilinear knitting machine of a conventional type.
The yarn-feeders of the above type, which are well-known to the person skilled in the art, have the main aim of maintaining the amount of yarn stored on the drum substantially constant, while minimizing the tension of the yarn delivered from the drum.
The amount of yarn stored on the drum is controlled by a triad of sensors. A first sensor, typically a Hall sensor, detects the passing of magnets attached to the flywheel in order to calculate the amount of yarn wound on the drum and the winding speed; a second sensor, generally a mechanical sensor, provides a binary information indicative of the presence or absence of a minimum amount of stocked loops in the area where the sensor is arranged; a third sensor, which can be, e.g., a optical sensor, a piezoelectric sensor, and the like, provides at least one pulse per each unwound loop, and is also used for calculating the amount of yarn wound on the drum and the winding speed.
While with the so-called “positive” yarn feeders such as the one described in EP-A-950742, the tension of the yarn is directly controlled by comparing a reference tension value with a measured tension value, and then by varying the yarn-feeding speed in such a way as to minimize the difference between such values, with the negative yarn feeders the tension is controlled either by weft-braking devices such as the one described in EP-B-534 263, or by devices having a simpler construction, such as brush-type brakes or so-called “duck-type” brakes of a conventional type.
In braking devices such as the one described in EP-B-622 485, the yarn is pressed between a fixed lamina and a movable braking member, which is also shaped as a lamina and is driven by a linear motor. In braking devices such as the one described in EP-B-1 059 375, the unwinding yarn is pressed between the delivery edge of the drum and a frustoconical, hollow braking member connected to a motor. In both cases, the motor which drives the braking member is controlled by a closed-loop control unit which modulates the braking action applied upon the yarn. The control unit receives a measured tension signal from a tension sensor arranged downstream of the feeder, and compares it with a reference tension indicative of the desired tension, by a control loop having the aim of minimizing the difference between the measured tension and the reference tension.
The above-described control system is designed to compensate the slow variations of tension due, for example, to wearing of the braking means, and is set to be substantially unaffected by small, sudden variations of tension caused, e.g., by the presence of a knot or by the passing of a length of yarn having an uneven section.
However, with certain operative conditions, e.g., at the starting of the weaving process, when the knitting machine is not running, or at the threading step, when the yarn is motionless, the above control system is subject to deceiving because the tension of the yarn unwinding from the feeder is much lower than the normal operative tension, and in certain cases it may be even equal to zero. In these cases, the control loop increases the intensity of the braking action more and more up to the uppermost braking level, without ever reaching the desired tension value. Consequently, when yarn is drawn from the drum again, such a high braking value causes the yarn tension to reach a peak that can give rise to textile defects and even to the breaking of the yarn.
Therefore, it is a main object of the present invention to improve the above-described method for controlling the yarn tension in such a way as to overcome the drawbacks deriving from particular operative conditions such as the above-described ones, where the yarn tension reaches very low levels, even equal to zero.
The above object and other advantages, which will better appear below, are achieved by the method having the features recited in claim 1, and by the apparatus having the features recited in claim 5, while the dependent claims state other advantageous, though secondary, features of the invention.
The invention will be now described in more detail with reference to a few preferred, non-exclusive embodiments, shown by way of non limited example in the attached drawings, wherein:
With initial reference to
The amount of yarn stored on drum 12 is controlled by a triad of sensors. A first sensor S1, typically a Hall sensor, detects the passing of magnets such as M, which are attached to flywheel 14, in order to calculate the amount of yarn wound on the drum as well as the winding speed. A second sensor S2, generally a mechanical sensor, provides a binary information indicative of the presence or absence of a minimum amount of stock in an intermediate area of drum 12. A third sensor S3, preferably an optical sensor, provides a pulse UWP per each unwound loop.
Downstream of yarn-feeder 10, a weft-braking device 20 is arranged which is controlled by a control unit CU, which will be better described below, in order to control the tension of the yarn unwinding from drum 12 and to maintain the tension substantially constant. Downstream of weft-braking device 20, a tension sensor 22 is arranged, which controls the tension of yarn F unwinding from the drum and generates a measured tension signal T_meas.
Control unit CU comprises a tension control block TC which receives measured tension signal T_meas and is programmed to compare it with a reference tension T-ref indicative of the desired tension, and to generate a braking level signal BI which drives weft-braking device 20 in such a way as to vary the braking intensity in order to minimize the difference between the measured tension and the reference tension.
According to the present invention, tension control block TC is normally disabled, and control unit CU comprises a speed-estimating block SE which processes signals UWP from third sensor S3 in such a way as to calculate the actual speed of consumption of yarn as a function of the time intervals between such pulses UWP, and is programmed to generate an enabling signal LE which enables tension control block TC only when such speed overcomes a predetermined threshold value, which can even be equal to zero. On the contrary, when the calculated speed is lower than the threshold value, tension control block TC is disabled and braking level signal BI will be “frozen” at the value memorized at the immediately previous instant, until the speed overcomes again the threshold value and the tension control block will start again to operate by using the frozen value as first value.
With an alternative embodiment of the invention, shown in
The disclosures in European Patent Application No. 07425547.2 from which this application claims priority are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07425547 | Aug 2007 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5398732 | Zenoni et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5476122 | Schuster et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5544680 | De Ro | Aug 1996 | A |
5553641 | Zenoni | Sep 1996 | A |
6328081 | Gotti et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6467512 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7584014 | Gotti et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 536 088 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 622 485 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 707 102 | Apr 1996 | EP |
1 106 721 | Jun 2001 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090057464 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |