This nonprovisional application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(a) to German Patent Application No. DE 10 2009 024 508.1, which was filed in Germany on Jun. 8, 2009, and which is herein incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to projectile imprinting, in particular for terminally guided projectiles or ammunition in the medium caliber range.
2. Description of the Background Art
Guidance in the terminal phase for ammunition fired from a barrel of a weapon is subject to limitations due to various loads during firing. Sensor and guidance elements must have a robust design. In addition, the volume in medium caliber ammunition for installation is limited. Seeker heads with their inertial sensors, in particular, cannot always be housed, especially in medium caliber ammunition, as a payload must also be carried. Therefore space-saving technologies are used, for which semi-active methods have been developed, such as beam rider guidance. In this method, four coded lasers project a pattern to the prescribed trajectory. Based on the areas the tail sensor of the projectile sees, the projectile can determine its individual miss distance from its laser beam.
DE 35 01 955 C2 discloses a target selection method for terminally guided ammunition or guided missiles, respectively. In order to get effective use from such ammunition, it is suggested that the radiation reflected from the presently tracked target be analyzed in a signal receiver in each seeker head to identify whether the signal sent from another seeker head is contained in the analyzed signal or not. If this is the case, the guided missile will seek a new target.
A terminally guided droppable unit for attacking targets emitting acoustic signals is furthermore known from DE 32 28 461 C2. When recognizing a corresponding acoustic source, such as the sound of a battle tank, which emits a sound different from regular wheeled vehicles, transverse forces on the droppable unit are generated via a passive acoustic sensor depending on the sensor signals.
A weapon system for guided pin-point attack of multiple targets is shown in DE 28 29 934 A1. The projectile better positioned for a particular target is selected through computer analysis, turned to firing position and fired at the target with a defined lateral lead.
A sensor arrangement in a seeker head is described in DE 33 42 958 C2, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 4,619,421. The sensor is articulated via coupling rods to a biaxial outer gimbal system offset axially behind it for movement of the sensor relative to the seeker head. The sensor as well as the outer gimbal system are each held in a spherical surface pairing.
DE 198 45 611 A1 describes a projectile as well as a method for correcting the trajectory. Here a magnetic field sensor is used to recognize the roll attitude of the correcting unit.
Methods for determining the roll attitude of a rolling flying object can be found in EP 0 745 828 B1, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 5,740,986 as well as in EP 0 742 420 B1, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 5,896,106, which are all incorporated herein by reference.
It is an object of the invention to provide a method which permits an effective use of projectiles during an optimal engagement of the target.
Often salvos/bursts of fire are fired to increase the probability of hits, in particular in the medium caliber range, so that usually only a cluster correction is performed, i.e. all projectiles receive a blanket correction. In the AHEAD methods, the fuse timer of each projectile is set at the muzzle end in order for the projectile to eject its pay load, such as tungsten sub-ammunition, shortly before the target and destroys it.
The invention, thus, is based on the idea of addressing each individual projectile, in particular after a firing burst (sustained firing or fast individual firing) separately and, in doing so, pass additional information to the individual projectile about the direction of the earth's magnetic field. The characterization of the projectile is based on the principle of beam riding guidance for projectiles. Each projectile reads only the guidance beam identified for it and can, using additional information, determine its absolute roll attitude in space in order to achieve the proper triggering of its correcting pulses. This characterization, for example, following the AHEAD-method, is transferred to the projectile via an induction coil at the muzzle of the barrel, see for example CH 691 143 A5, which is incorporated herein by reference. Alternative possibilities of transfers, for example via microwave transmitter, are known to experts, e.g., from EP 1 726 911 A1, which corresponds to U.S. Publication No. 2007/0074625, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Based on the known fact that terminally guided projectiles cannot determine their position in space as they are in free fall and therefore do not detect gravity, use of a magnetic sensor is provided. While it can measure the earth's magnetic field and determine the magnetic field lines, this information alone is not sufficient, since the direction of the magnetic field line on the one hand depends on the position on the globe and on the other hand on the direction of the ballistic trajectory line of fire. As a further development, therefore, the ammunition or projectiles are also “imprinted” with the local direction of the earth's magnetic field, when the fuse timing for the ammunition is set. This “imprinting” can occur at various positions, such as in the weapon, in the barrel or during flight.
Further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawing which are given by way of illustration only, and thus, are not limitive of the present invention, and wherein the sole FIGURE illustrates a projectile according to an embodiment of the invention.
The only FIGURE shows the essential parts of a projectile 1 for the implementation of the idea. In this example, the projectile incorporates a tail sensor 2, a magnetic field sensor 3, explosives 4, as well as at least an ejection element 5, as a correction impulse propulsion unit 6. 7 identifies an analysis device which is functionally connected to the other assemblies.
The function is as follows:
The magnetic sensor 3 recognizes the rotational speed (roll rate) of the projectile 1 and the direction of the magnetic field relative to projectile 1. Through the previously determined declination angles of the earth's magnetic field from the vertical direction of the earth's gravity field, the geostationary roll attitude of projectile 1 can be determined in the analysis device 7. Via the now carried out “imprinting”, for example when projectile 1 passes the muzzle, projectile 1 or the analysis unit 7, respectively, during flight recognizes its individual deviation using the guidance beam specifically generated for projectile 1. The guidance beam itself, for example, is emitted from the firing location. Now projectile 1 corrects its actual trajectory to the intended trajectory by initiating the correction impulse propulsion unit(s) 6 in the known fashion.
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 024 508 | Jun 2009 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3765621 | Shigehara | Oct 1973 | A |
3834653 | Perkel | Sep 1974 | A |
4309005 | McLean | Jan 1982 | A |
4328938 | Reisman et al. | May 1982 | A |
4431150 | Epperson, Jr. | Feb 1984 | A |
4619421 | Trummer | Oct 1986 | A |
4646990 | Cleveland, Jr. | Mar 1987 | A |
4923151 | Roberts et al. | May 1990 | A |
4967981 | Yff | Nov 1990 | A |
5099246 | Skagerlund | Mar 1992 | A |
5131602 | Linick | Jul 1992 | A |
5163637 | Hansen | Nov 1992 | A |
5189368 | Chase | Feb 1993 | A |
5355767 | Morita | Oct 1994 | A |
5740986 | Seidensticker et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5788178 | Barrett, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5896106 | Seidensticker et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6163021 | Mickelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6223105 | Teague | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6345785 | Harkins et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6398155 | Hepner et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422507 | Lipeles | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6467722 | Berry et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474593 | Lipeles et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493651 | Harkins et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6556896 | Meyer | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6725173 | An et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7341221 | Wilson | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7500636 | Bredy | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7566027 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7989742 | Bredy | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20070074625 | Seidensticker et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
691 143 | Apr 2001 | CH |
28 29 934 | Jan 1980 | DE |
32 28 461 | Jun 1984 | DE |
33 42 958 | Jun 1985 | DE |
35 01 955 | Jul 1986 | DE |
198 45 611 | Feb 2000 | DE |
0 742 420 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0 745 828 | Dec 1996 | EP |
1 726 911 | Nov 2006 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100308152 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |