1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method for coupling online and Internet services.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A significant application field of the Internet technique today is the electronic mail operation (e-mail). For this purpose, for example, the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol is employed. It is based on the TCP/IP protocol and consequently is continuously applicable in the public Internet, as well as also in most Local Area Networks (LAN).
This e-mail service is also made available for example to most customers of so-called online services (for example T-online, AOL, etc.). Internet Access Providers (IAPs) as well as Internet Service Providers (ISP), who have at their disposal their own service offers, make available such services. All of these service providers make possible for customers, who are connected across telecommunication networks, access to the Internet and, if necessary, make available IP-based services. In the following these service offers are collectively referred to as ISP.
To some extent telecommunication network operators also offer IP-based services as well as the transition to the Internet. This takes place, for example, in the GSM mobile radio network by means of WAP platform (Wireless Application Protocol). Such services are accessible to internal customers but not to Internet customers.
In addition, there are so-called freemail providers in the Internet (cf. freemail Anbieter im Test, in Tomorrow, Edition 7/2000). These providers also make e-mail services and other services available. In contrast to online services and IAPs (ISPs), they do not have at their disposal dial-up nodes to telecommunication networks but rather make available host computers with Internet connection in the Internet. Accordingly, they can be contacted by customers in a second step only after they have already been switched through to the Internet via an ISP, for example. Such freemail applications in the Internet are financed most often through advertisement revenues and are free of charge to the user, while the ISP, as a rule, concludes a contract with his customers and levies charges accordingly.
Customers of an e-mail service always have a so-called account. This is a protected access to their own mail stored on the server. The advantage of the ISPs compared to the freemail provider consists most often in the comfortable and rapid access type, in appropriately protected accesses and in less advertisement.
Freemail accesses are most often protected by user identification (name) and by a simple password. The danger of misuse is here relatively great. Once a connection has been established, the data transfer is most often protected through additional security protocols, for example Secure Sockets Layer (SSL). The great advantage of the freemails comprises that these services are accessible from every Internet connection worldwide, while ISP services, as a rule, are only accessible from the home PC, since the access parameters (telephone connection) are used as a security criterion in the access procedure.
A mobile customer has here various restrictions. While the capability is given of using these parameters in other PCs also, however, it fails most often because the foreign PCs often cannot be configured appropriately. For example PC work places in business networks comprise as a rule server-based operating systems, such as Microsoft Windows NT or UNIX and cannot be individually configured by the user.
The mobile ISP customer consequently has considerable disadvantages when using his ISP e-mail account. The disadvantages become greater if the e-mail provider offers not only mail services but rather an expanded offer for example Unified Messaging, etc. (cf. Unified Messaging Anbieter im Vergleich, in Tomorrow, edition 7/2000). In this case extensive services for the ISP customer are omitted. For that reason increasingly more ISP customers are switching to freemail providers in order to be able to receive at least their e-mail everywhere.
The present invention addresses the problem of proposing a method on the basis of which simple and location-independent access of mobile customers to e-mail services and other services of their online or ISP contract partners can be realized.
The current problem that in particular personalized services (e-mail etc.) with Internet service providers and online providers are only reachable via telecommunication network and RAS/RADIUS access, not however across the public Internet, is solved in the manner that the ISP is equipped with an Open Internet Application platform (OIA) (for example freemail platform) and the platforms are coupled in a manner such that the ISP customer can also utilize, when accessing via the Internet, a service offer which, compared to the conventional Internet customers, is expanded.
According to the invention, services such as for example e-mail services, messaging etc., which as a rule are only available to contract customers/network customers with access via telecommunication network and RAS/Radius-protected authentication procedure via which generally accessible Internet interfaces are reached. The contract customer can hereby always be reached via his ISP e-mail address and can utilize the mail account, if necessary, via the public Internet from any desired terminal.
The invention will be explained utilizing the Figures in the drawing, which here only describe a feasible embodiment in schematic representation, and further characteristics, advantages and application fields will become evident based on the Figures. In the drawing show:
The transition from the communication network 4 to the Internet service provider (ISP) 9 takes place by means of logging on via a Remote Access Server (RAS) 10. With the support of an installed RADIUS client, the RAS 10 first establishes the connection with the radius server 11 of the ISP. The radius server 11 is responsible for Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA). Therewith the access rights are verified and the service as such can be assessed a fee. As a rule, the ISP 9 calculates a basic monthly fee, a time-based access fee as well as diverse service costs and often affects settlement of the account of the customer via the telephone bill of the telecommunication company.
The input and output points of the ISP 9 are as a rule equipped with routers 12 for the purpose of routing the IP protocols as well as additionally with so-called firewalls 13 (here represented as a dot). Firewalls 13 permit the monitoring of the data traffic and the blocking of undesirable accesses. Consequently, they offer more security for the network of the ISP 9 as well as for its services and the data contents of the customers. Access from the Internet to the server farm 15 of the ISP 9 (for example e-mail) is therefore not possible for reasons of security.
The location of the servers 15 in a region protected in this way is also denoted as Demilitarized Zone (DZ).
Apart from these special cases, even with mobility in other networks, the access to the ISP 9 is conducted through the contract network to the ISP 9 in the same manner as with stationary visiting. The access principle is therewith in all cases for land-line networks and mobile radio customers (private and business customers) comparable with
A web server 23 terminates the communication with the customer, identifies user ID and password and permits the access to the mail server 24. A security protocol (for example SSL) can be operated for example in the router 22, in the web server 23, or in the e-mail server 24.
The customer terminal 1 is connected via a telecommunication network 25 to the Internet service provider 9, and can utilize its services as well as also services in the Internet 14, which are made available for example by the Open Internet Platform (OIA).
Any customer from the Internet 14 or any ISP customer, who logged onto the e-mail server 24 of the OIA platform 26, can now set up and operate an e-mail account (freemail account) in the already described procedure.
In addition, in this configuration the capability is given for contract customers of the ISP 9 to redirect their e-mail of the ISP platform onto the e-mail server 24 of the OIA platform 26 and, if necessary, conversely. This service can be administered at the RAS side as well as optionally at the Internet side. Consequently, the customer utilizes also for the freemail account his existing e-mail address of the ISP network.
Hereby the contract customer is always reachable via his ISP e-mail address and yet can utilize the mail account if needed also via the public Internet from any desired terminal.
The high security standard of the ISP for contract customer continues to be safeguarded, however, the business field can also be expanded to Internet customers.
The schematic illustration shows physically completely separate platforms, independent e-mail servers 15 and 24 and a connection 27, internal to the provider, between the platforms 9 and 26. Hereby the highest security is given.
Alternatively, the physical separation can also be partially or completely replaced by a logical separation, thereby that in ISP 9 and OIA 26 at least partially the same hardware equipment is used. In this case different logical networks are generated, which are secured through different IP addressing as well as, if necessary, different hardware interfaces and separate software procedures. Herein for example two independent e-mail servers can be set up on a host computer, or an e-mail database with combined access procedures is set up.
The highest security however is represented by the independent hardware platform.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 49 618 | Oct 2000 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE01/03783 | 10/2/2001 | WO | 00 | 7/3/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/03008 | 4/11/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6195533 | Tkatch et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6233688 | Montenegro | May 2001 | B1 |
6742036 | Das et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6771649 | Tripunitara et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6904026 | Tarnanen et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6910074 | Amin et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6957248 | Quine et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
20010032154 | Schummer | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020023135 | Shuster | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020058499 | Ortiz | May 2002 | A1 |
20050086316 | Chen | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111439 | Yarlagadda et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060178136 | Irlam et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070050481 | Rigole | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080077482 | Tota et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080109531 | Jenkins | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040030767 A1 | Feb 2004 | US |