This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT Application Number PCT/EP2016/054804 having an international filing date of Nov. 10, 2015, which designated the United States, said PCT application claiming the benefit of French Patent Application No. 1551916 (now French Patent No. 3033450), filed Mar. 6, 2015, the entire disclosure of each of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The invention concerns the field of electrical connections. In particular, the invention concerns a method of crimping an electrical contact to an electrical cable, an electrical contact crimped with this method, as well as a tool for implementing this method.
In connection techniques, one uses the coupling of male and female electrical contacts to make an electrical connection between cable connectors or between a cable connector and an electrical or electronic device, for example. In the case of a cable connector, male or female contacts are electrically joined, by welding, crimping or another technique, to a cable comprising one or more strands.
In automotive connections, the contacts are often made by stamping and bending a copper sheet. The cables are generally also made of copper.
To reduce the weight of the electrical harnesses in vehicles in particular, the copper cables are sometimes replaced by aluminum cables comprising several conductor strands. The replacement of copper cables by aluminum cables presents several problems. Primarily, the aluminum being covered by an oxide layer, the electrical conduction in the area of the contact zones between an aluminum cable and a copper contact may be reduced. In order to mitigate this problem, on the one hand one tries to break up the oxide layer in order to have better conductivity and, on the other hand, to prevent the reforming of this oxide layer after crimping. To this end, one may increase the level of compression of the cable in the crimping zone. But this increasing of the level of compression causes a reduced mechanical strength of the cable in the zone so compressed.
Document U.S. Pat. No. 7,306,495B2 proposes a method of crimping in which one provides:
In this method, one furthermore performs a crimping of the crimping zone to the cable by bending and compressing the fins onto the cable. To this end, one uses a tool comprising a punch having two different crimping heights. One thus obtains a crimping zone which, after the crimping, itself comprises a mechanical retention portion and an electrical conduction portion. The mechanical retention and electrical conduction portions are continuous in material with each other. In other words, starting from a contact with a single fin on either side of the cable, without cutting off these fins or slitting them to separate them into several portions, one obtains a continuous crimping shaft in the longitudinal direction. The mechanical retention and electrical conduction portions have different final crimping heights, the final crimping height of the mechanical retention portion being higher than the final crimping height of the electrical conduction portion.
Thus, in the mechanical retention zone, the strands of the cable are less compressed (the level of compression is for example between 20 and 30%), and so the integrity of their mechanical properties is essentially preserved and the retention of the cable in the crimping shaft meets the specifications. For example, for a copper wire of 1.5 mm2, this retention force should be greater than 155 N. In the electrical conduction zone, the strands of the cable are more compressed (the level of compression is for example between 50 and 65%), the mechanical properties there are thus degraded as compared to the mechanical retention zone. On the other hand, the electrical resistivity in the electrical conduction zone is less than in the mechanical retention zone.
However, one may observe, in certain cases, that the electrical and mechanical properties of contacts crimped with this type of method degrade over time.
One purpose of the invention is to mitigate at least in part this drawback.
To this end, a method is provided of crimping an electrical contact, as mentioned above, in which furthermore the difference between the final crimping heights of the mechanical retention portion and the electrical conduction portion is between 0.4 and 0.7 mm, or less, and between 0.5 and 0.6 mm in certain cases.
Thanks to this arrangement (which may result for example from the geometry of the crimping punch), the deformations of the contact in the transition zone between the mechanical retention portion and the electrical conduction portion are limited and the contact has no crack or tear. Furthermore, if the copper contact is covered by a protection layer, for example of tin, the integrity of the latter remains intact. One may thus avoid problems of electrolytic corrosion due to electrochemical potential differences between the cable and the contact.
One may furthermore provide one or another of the following characteristics, considered alone or in combination with one or more others:
According to another aspect, the invention concerns an electrical contact crimped with the aforementioned method. This contact comprises a run between the mechanical retention portion and the electrical conduction portion whose height is between 0.4 and 0.7 mm, or less, and between 0.5 and 0.6 mm in certain cases.
One may moreover provide for this contact one or another of the following characteristics, considered alone or in combination with one or more others:
According to another aspect, the invention concerns a tool comprising a crimping punch for implementing a method of crimping an electrical contact. This punch comprises a groove having substantially a W shape in cross section in a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal direction. This groove has two successive segments in the longitudinal direction, a deeper segment to compress the fins in the area of the mechanical retention portion and a less deep segment to compress the fins in the area of the electrical conduction portion, the height difference between these two segments being between 0.4 and 0.7 mm, or less, and between 0.5 and 0.6 mm in certain cases.
One may moreover provide for this contact one or another of the following characteristics, considered alone or in combination with one or more others:
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention shall appear upon reading the detailed description and the appended drawings, in which:
In these figures, the same references are used to designate identical or similar elements.
The electrical contact 100 has a coupling portion 110, a crimping zone 120 against the conductor strands 210 of a cable 200 and a crimping end 130 against the insulator 220 of this cable 200 (see
Prior to crimping, the crimping zone 120 is present in the form of a gutter with two fins 122, 124 extending on either side of a base 126. The two fins 122, 124 and the base 126 thus form, prior to crimping, a groove having basically a U-shaped cross section in a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal direction L. Each of the two fins 122, 124 is continuous for its entire length. In other words, the two fins 122, 124 have neither a slit nor a cut.
The electrical contact 100 undergoes a step of crimping onto a cable 200 during which the two fins 122, 124 are bent and compressed against a bare portion of cable 200. This crimping step is done by inserting the end of the cable 200 into the respective grooves of the crimping zone 120 and the crimping end 130 and striking the electrical contact 100, in the area of the crimping zone 120, between an anvil (not shown) of a type known to the skilled person and a punch 300, which shall be described below.
As represented in
The mechanical retention portion 140 and electrical conduction portion 150 have final crimping heights which are different in a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal direction L and correspond to the direction D of displacement of the punch 300 toward the anvil and each other. The final crimping height of the mechanical retention portion 140 (also see
The heights of the mechanical retention portion 140 and the electrical conduction portion 150 are each substantially constant for their respective length. Thus, the height difference is substantially fixed and may be between 0.5 mm and 0.6 mm, for a thickness of copper sheet between 0.20 and 0.39 mm and for an aluminum cable whose diameter is between 1.25 and 4 mm, or even between 0.75 and 6 mm. This height difference is enough to obtain very different levels of compression respectively in the mechanical retention portion 140 and the electrical conduction portion 150 while avoiding the creation of a crack or a tear in the sheet forming the electrical contact 100. This is particularly important when the copper is tin plated. In fact, a tear or a crack in the tin-plated copper layer would expose the underlying copper and thus in the long term cause electrochemical corrosion effects, making the contact mechanically brittle and degrading its conduction, especially in the area of the contact/cable interface.
One defines the level of compression as being the ratio between the cross section of the cable 200 after crimping and the cross section of the cable 200 prior to crimping. One may then determine, by comparing the cross sections of the electrical contact 100, and thus the cross sections of the cable 200, respectively represented in
In the example described here, the length lce (that is, in the longitudinal direction L) of the electrical conduction portion 150 is greater than 1.5 mm. It has been discovered by the inventors that, with a length lce less than 1.4 mm, the electrical resistance of the crimping is greater than 0.3 mΩ and evolves over time, regardless of the level of compression in the area of the electrical conduction portion 150. It has also been discovered by the inventors that, with a level of compression in the area of the electrical conduction portion 150 less than 50%, the electrical resistance of the crimping is greater than 0.3 mΩ and evolves over time, regardless of the length lce. On the other hand, with a length lce greater than 1.4 mm and a level of compression in the electrical conduction portion 150 greater than 50%, one obtains a resistance in the area of the electrical conduction portion 150 of less than 0.3 Mω that is stable over time.
Returning to
The height difference between the electrical conduction portion 150 and the mechanical retention portion 140 forms a run with an internal bending 162 and an external bending 164. The internal bending 162 and the external bending 164 are rounded with a radius of curvature between 0.1 mm and 0.5 mm. In the present case, the radius of curvature of the internal bending 162 is 0.1 mm and that of the external bending 164 is 0.2 mm. In this case, the sum of the radii of curvature of the internal bending 162 and the external bending 164 is thus 0.3 mm.
The electrical contact 100 illustrated in
This punch 300 has substantially the shape of a parallelepiped plate, elongated between a high end 310 and a low end 320, in the direction D of displacement of the punch 300 during the crimping (see
As represented in
This groove 346 has substantially a W shape in cross section in a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal direction L. The groove 346 has two successive segments 348, 350 in the longitudinal direction L. The deepest segment 348 is the one which compresses the two fins 122, 124 in the area of the mechanical retention portion 140. The shallowest segment 350 is the one which compresses the two fins 122, 124 in the area of the electrical conduction portion 150. The height difference h between these two segments 348, 350 may be between 0.5 and 0.6 mm. In the example described here, this height difference h is 0.55 mm. The length of the shallowest segment 350 compressing the two fins 122, 124 in the area of the electrical conduction portion 150 has a dimension in the longitudinal direction which is greater than or equal to 1.4 mm. In the example described here, it is 1.5 mm.
The height difference h between the segments 348, 350 forms a run with a run edge 352 and a run bottom 354. The run edge 352 may have a radius of curvature between, for example, 0.1 mm and 0.5 mm. In the case described here, it is 0.1 mm. The bottom 354 of the run is likewise rounded. It may have a radius of curvature between, for example, 0.1 mm and 0.5 mm. In the case described here, it is 0.2 mm.
Furthermore, in order to prevent deterioration of any protective coating (such as tin) of the electrical contact 100, the ridge 356 of the groove 346 is likewise rounded with a radius of curvature between, for example, 0.15 and 0.4 mm.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15 51916 | Mar 2015 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2016/054804 | 3/7/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/142345 | 9/15/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4790173 | Boutcher, Jr. | Dec 1988 | A |
5046241 | Ricard | Sep 1991 | A |
5486653 | Dohi | Jan 1996 | A |
6230406 | Balfour | May 2001 | B1 |
7306495 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20010023152 | Tachi | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20050124231 | Okamoto | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070054565 | Courtin | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070202726 | Lee | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20100105256 | Lyford | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100120288 | Drew | May 2010 | A1 |
20100230160 | Ono | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110021092 | Ukai | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20130040509 | Mitose | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130199842 | Inoue | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130231012 | Lengert | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140302726 | Adachi | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150140856 | Sato | May 2015 | A1 |
20150140874 | Sakaguchi | May 2015 | A1 |
20150264800 | Schmalbuch | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2008120048 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009115860 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180241167 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |