The invention relates to a method for defining the injection time in an injection system for an internal combustion engine.
In internal combustion engines with an injection system, the injection time is conventionally defined as a function of the angular position of the crankshaft. However, in a four-stroke engine injection operations for a specific combustion chamber do not take place at every revolution so that in order to define the injection time it is also necessary to know the phase angle of the crankshaft. For this reason, during the starting operation of the internal combustion engine the angular position of the camshaft is conventionally also sensed in order to derive the phase angle of the crankshaft therefrom.
However, it is a disadvantage here that when the camshaft sensor fails or has a malfunction it is not possible for the internal combustion engine to operate.
The invention is thus based on the object of providing a method for defining the injection time in an injection system for an internal combustion engine, which method permits the internal combustion engine to operate even when the camshaft sensor fails or has a malfunction.
The object is achieved by the invention, according to one embodiment, in accordance with the following steps: sensing a crankshaft signal representing the angular position of the crankshaft, determining the injection time as a function of the crankshaft signal, determining the phase angle of the crankshaft, and synchronizing the calculated injection time by of the phase angle of the crankshaft, wherein the phase angle of the crankshaft is determined as a function of the crankshaft signal.
The invention comprises the general technical teaching whereby the synchronization of the injection time determined by means of the crankshaft signal is carried out independently of the camshaft signal.
The phase angle of the crankshaft is therefore preferably determined within the scope of the invention as a function of the crankshaft signal, as will be explained in more detail below.
In the preferred embodiment, the angular position of the camshaft is additionally sensed, the camshaft signal being checked for correctness. When the camshaft signal is correct, the synchronization of the injection time which is determined as a function of the angular position of the crankshaft is then conventionally carried out as a function of the camshaft signal, whereas the synchronization of the injection time is not carried out as a function of the camshaft signal when the camshaft signal is faulty or failed.
The checking of the camshaft signal can be carried out, for example, by virtue of the fact that the time interval between the pulses of the camshaft signal is measured, a malfunction of the camshaft sensor being assumed if the pulse interval exceeds a predefined limiting value.
Furthermore, in order to check the correctness of the camshaft signal, the amplitude of the pulses of the camshaft signal can be measured, a malfunction of the camshaft sensor being assumed if the pulse amplitude drops below the predefined limiting value.
However, in the preferred embodiment of the invention, the camshaft signal is checked by determining a first rotational speed value from the camshaft signal and a second rotational speed value from the crankshaft signal, the two rotational speed values having to correspond when the rotational speed sensor and the camshaft sensor are functioning correctly. When there is a deviation between the two rotational speed values, it is therefore assumed that the camshaft signal is faulty.
The synchronization of the injection time which is determined as a function of the crankshaft signal is preferably carried out within the scope of a plurality of successive synchronization attempts. For this purpose, firstly a test value for the phase angle of the crankshaft is predefined, which test value is used to synchronize the injection time. Then, the rotational speed of the internal combustion engine is measured in order to be able to check whether the synchronization with the test value was successful. If the rotational speed rises after a synchronization attempt it is assumed that the test value correctly represents the phase angle of the crankshaft so that it is possible to continue with the normal injection operation. On the other hand, if the attempt at synchronization with the test value does not lead to a rise in the rotational speed, the test value is changed and a renewed synchronization attempt is performed in the fashion described above until a synchronization attempt is successful or an aborting operation takes place.
The test value is preferably changed by a predefined angular offset after each synchronization attempt, the angular offset being preferably calculated as a function of the number of cylinders of the internal combustion engine and the crankshaft angle as follows:
On the other hand, if the crankshaft geometry is asymmetrical, the angular offset must be correspondingly adapted.
Furthermore, it is to be noted that the rotational speed of the internal combustion engine is preferably not measured directly after a synchronization attempt but rather preferably only after a predefined number of revolutions of the crankshaft or of the camshaft, or after a predefined waiting time, in order to wait for the internal combustion engine to respond to the test value.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the synchronization attempts are aborted after a predefined maximum synchronization period and/or after a predefined number of synchronization attempts in order to protect the internal combustion engine.
Other advantageous developments of the invention are characterized in the subclaims or are explained in more detail below together with the description of the preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention by reference to the figures, of which:
a and 2b show the method according to the invention as a flowchart.
The time diagram illustrated in
Furthermore, the time diagram shows the camshaft signal NW that is generated by a separate camshaft sensor, the camshaft sensor having a sensor wheel with two circular segments of 180° each.
In addition the time diagram shows the ignition times ZOT1-ZOT4 for the individual combustion chambers of the internal combustion engine and the technically suitable bandwidths 1 of the injection time within which it is appropriate for the internal combustion engine to operate.
The method according to the invention will now be explained below with reference to the flowcharts illustrated in
At the beginning, the crankshaft signal is firstly sensed and checked. When the crankshaft signal is faulty, a camshaft emergency operation then takes place, whereas when the crankshaft signal is correct, the camshaft signal is also sensed and checked.
For this purpose, the time interval between the pulses of the camshaft signal is measured, a malfunction of the camshaft sensor being assumed if the pulse interval exceeds a predefined limiting value.
As an alternative to this, the camshaft signal can also be checked by measuring the amplitude of the pulses of the camshaft signal, a malfunction of the camshaft sensor being assumed if the amplitude of the pulses drops below a predefined limiting value.
Finally, it is also possible to measure the edge intervals of the camshaft signal and of the crankshaft signal in order to check the camshaft signal.
However, the camshaft signal is preferably checked by calculating a rotational speed value both from the camshaft signal and from the crankshaft signal, the two rotational speed values having to correspond when the camshaft sensor and the crankshaft sensor are functioning correctly. When there is a deviation between the two rotational speed values which are calculated in this way, it is therefore possible to assume that the camshaft sensor is faulty.
When the camshaft signal is correct, the injection time is calculated and synchronized by means of the crankshaft signal and the camshaft signal.
On the other hand, when the camshaft signal is faulty, firstly a fault signal is stored and if appropriate a signal lamp is actuated in order to signal the malfunction of the camshaft sensor.
Furthermore, in this case, a test value for the phase angle of the crankshaft is defined in order to synchronize the previously calculated injection time by means of this test value.
Then, an injection process is performed at the injection time determined in this way, in order to be able to check whether the test value represents the phase angle of the crankshaft correctly. While the injection process is being carried out, the system initially waits for a predefined number N of revolutions and the rotational speed is measured.
If the test value correctly represents the phase angle of the crankshaft, the internal combustion engine reacts to the injection operation with a rise in rotational speed. In this case, the test value is transferred and the system continues with the normal injection operation.
However, otherwise a counter i which represents the number of synchronization attempts is incremented, the counter i being compared with a predefined limiting value imax. If the number i of synchronization attempts exceeds the predefined limiting value imax, the synchronization attempts are aborted in order to protect the internal combustion engine.
On the other hand, a new test value for the phase angle of the internal combustion engine is otherwise calculated and the injection time is synchronized by means of this test value. This cycle is run through until either the predefined maximum number of synchronization attempts has been exceeded or a rise in rotational speed is sensed. The test value for the phase angle of the crankshaft is changed here between the individual synchronization attempts, in each case by a predefined angular offset, the angular offset being calculated according to the following formula:
The invention is not restricted to the preferred exemplary embodiment described above. Instead, a multiplicity of variants and modifications which make use of the inventive idea and therefore also fall within the scope of protection are conceivable.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 43 756 | Sep 2000 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of co-pending International Application No. PCT/DE01/03355 filed Sep. 3, 2001, which designates the United States, and claims priority to German application number DE10043756.7 filed Sep. 5, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4495924 | Ueno et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
5699771 | Tanabe | Dec 1997 | A |
5749222 | Nakajima et al. | May 1998 | A |
5871002 | Nada | Feb 1999 | A |
6109225 | Ogita et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6467458 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6499342 | Gonzales, Jr. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6671565 | Kobayashi | Dec 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
33 07 833 | Aug 1984 | DE |
42 29 773 | Mar 1994 | DE |
44 18 577 | Nov 1995 | DE |
44 18 578 | Nov 1995 | DE |
44 18 579 | Nov 1995 | DE |
0 420 288 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0 581 151 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0 942 163 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0223031 | Mar 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030196643 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCTDE01/03355 | Sep 2001 | US |
Child | 10379038 | US |