The present disclosure is generally directed to a method of detecting bridged taps.
Broadband telephony services based on digital subscriber line (DSL) technology offers users high digital data rates over telephony transmission facilities. The transmission facilities connecting customer premises equipment to the network are commonly known as the “loop” and consists of two wires twisted together. The millions of loops supporting service to millions of telephony subscribers are commonly called the Outside Plant (OSP). Historically, OSP was constructed and maintained in a fashion that allowed a high probability for one or more bridged taps to exist on the typical loop. A bridged tap is a segment of cable pair attached to the loop but not in the speaking path. These bridged taps had little effect on voice services, as transmission properties of a loop in the voiceband frequency range is little affected by the presence of a tap. However, ordinary bridged taps are very detrimental to DSL performance. Efficient and effective detection of their presence and effect on DSL services is required for efficient network operation.
Accordingly, there is a need for efficient methods of detecting bridged taps.
In a particular embodiment a method of collecting and processing modem data is provided. The method includes, during training of a broadband modem, sending a series of tones within a frequency transmission band of the broadband modem, receiving the transmitted series of tones at a receiving broadband modem, receiving a measurement value of a power level for each of the received tones in the series of tones transmitted to the receiving broadband modem, determining a transmission loss for each of the series of tones by comparing the predetermined transmission power level, and the received measured power level; performing a statistical match comparison between each of the received tone signals and a plurality of different computer models of a single transmission facility having various bridge taps connected to the single transmission facility, and determining a best fit between each of the received tone signals and one of the plurality of the bridge tap computer models. The series of tones have a predetermined transmission power level.
In accordance with a particular embodiment, a method of estimating bridged taps coupled to a communication line connected to a broadband modem device is disclosed. The method includes, during a training session of the broadband modem device, receiving a plurality of tones communicated over the communication line to the broadband modem device, the plurality of tones within a frequency reception band of the broadband modem and having a predetermined transmission power level; measuring a power level for each of the plurality of received tones; determining a transmission loss for each of the plurality of tones by comparing the predetermined transmission power level and the measured power level for each of the plurality of tones; and performing statistical match comparisons between each of the plurality of received tones and a plurality of computer models. Each of the plurality of computer models represents electrical transmission properties of a single transmission facility coupled to at least one bridged tap.
In another embodiment a data communication system is provided. The data communication system includes a memory including logic to estimate bridged taps coupled to a communication line that is coupled to an input of the data communication modem. The logic includes a data receiving module configured to capture data corresponding to a plurality of tones communicated over the transmission facility during a modem training session, a measurement module to capture measurement data related to a measured power level for each of the plurality of received tones, an insertion loss routine to determine a transmission loss for each of the plurality of tones by comparing the predetermined transmission power level and the measurement data for each of the plurality of tones, and statistical matching logic configured to perform statistical match comparisons between the captured data corresponding to each of the received tone signals and a plurality of computer models. Each of the plurality of computer models represents electrical transmission properties of a single transmission facility coupled to at least one bridged tap. The plurality of tones within a frequency reception band of the data communication modem, each of the plurality of tones having a predetermined transmission power level,
Referring to
Referring to
During operation, and during a training session of the DSL modems, such as modem 202, performance and diagnostics data related to the training session is collected and stored within the network DSL modem 204. The network DSL modem 204 passes the DSL performance data 212 and communicates this data over the internet and the data is stored on a server, such as the indicated raw diagnostic data 223 stored within the server 220.
Within the server environment, the diagnostic data evaluation software 224 processes the raw diagnostic data 223 to produce analyzed diagnostic data. The computer work station 230 in response to a request from network operator 240 may issue a file transfer protocol (FTP) request 214. The file transfer protocol (FTP) request 214 is received via the internet 210 and relayed to the server 220. In response to the FTP request 214 the diagnostic data evaluation software 224 communicates the analyzed diagnostic data relating to the DSL modem performance and sends an FTP file containing the requested DSL performance data to the computer workstation 230. The network operator 240 may then issue commands at the workstation 230 to further analyze and evaluate the processed DSL data.
Referring to
The DSL control system 302 may be implemented as a computer system that includes software to execute the evaluation logic 330 and the DSL selection logic 340. The DSL control system software includes logic to collect, store, and process DSL performance data for DSL modems corresponding to the DSL transmission facilities supported by DSLAM 304. The web-based reporting terminal 312 may be a computer workstation, or personal computer with a display device that includes an input device and a computer processor. An example is a computer workstation that may be operated by a user for viewing reports as to DSL network performance and statistics. The DSL profile database 306 may be implemented with standard computer database technology.
Referring to
For example, the transmission loss for a particular frequency is compared to a similar frequency loss that would occur with a single wire having a single bridged tap of a predetermined length attached thereto. In the event that a first evaluated computer model does not correspond to the calculated insertion loss, a second computer model of a single wire with a different bridged tap or multiple bridged taps or the position of the tap may then be evaluated and compared on a best fit basis. This process may be continued for a variety of computer models based on various configurations of bridged taps connected to the twisted pair loop to identify a best fit model for the received signal at the particular frequency level. Based on the best fit model, the particular detected bridged tap from the computer model is communicated as well as the tap length, effect on communication service, and the probability that the bridged tap from the model represents a physical tap on the DSL line, as shown at 410.
For example, a single bridged tap may be predicted by the computer model that has a bridged tap length of a thousand feet and a predicted significant effect on service, and an estimated probability of the model being accurate. This information may be communicated to a computer work station for viewing by a network operator. The network operator upon learning of the computer model estimated bridged tap information may make a determination as to whether to remove the physical bridged tap or to leave the bridged tap if the effect on service or probability of the bridge tap corresponding to a physical bridge tap is within service performance objectives. Referring to step 412, network operation decisions are then made such as removing taps based on the communicated bridged tap information. As an example, in some situations a bridged tap does not have a significant impact on communication service so that a network operator may make a decision to not remove the bridge tap(s). However, when the insertion loss model indicates the bridged tap has a high degree of impact on communication service of the supporting DSL facility, then in this situation, the network operator may initiate a decision to remove the physical bridged tap(s) on the DSL facility.
Referring to
Referring to
In another embodiment, the distance between taps can also be determined by examination of insertion loss. Shown in
The above disclosed subject matter is to be considered illustrative, and not restrictive, and the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications, enhancements, and other embodiments which fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, to the maximum extent allowed by law, the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the broadest permissible interpretation of the following claims and their equivalents, and shall not be restricted or limited by the foregoing detailed description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5751338 | Ludwig, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5974139 | McNamara et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987061 | Chen | Nov 1999 | A |
6044107 | Gatherer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055268 | Timm et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6081291 | Ludwig, Jr. | Jun 2000 | A |
6292559 | Gaikwad et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6317495 | Gaikwad et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6424657 | Voit et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6466088 | Rezvani et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467092 | Geile et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477238 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487276 | Rosen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498791 | Pickett et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6507606 | Shenoi et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6532277 | Ulanskas et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538451 | Galli et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549568 | Bingel | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570855 | Kung et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6597689 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608835 | Geile et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614781 | Elliott et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625255 | Green et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640239 | Gidwani | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643266 | Pugaczewski | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658052 | Krinsky et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667971 | Modarressi et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668041 | Kamali et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674725 | Nabkel et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6674749 | Mattathil | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680940 | Lewin et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697768 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6700927 | Esliger et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724859 | Galli | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728238 | Long et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731678 | White et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6735601 | Subrahmanyam | May 2004 | B1 |
6751218 | Hagirahim et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751315 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751662 | Natarajan et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754283 | Li | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6762992 | Lemieux | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763025 | Leatherbury et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765864 | Natarajan et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765918 | Dixon et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769000 | Akhtar et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769024 | Natarajan et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771673 | Baum et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775232 | Ah Sue et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775267 | Kung et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775268 | Wang et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6775273 | Kung et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778525 | Baum et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782082 | Rahamim | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6819746 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
20010040918 | Krinsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043647 | Belge | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020114383 | Belge et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040095921 | Kerpez | May 2004 | A1 |
20050123027 | Cioffi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050243904 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |