Information
-
Patent Application
-
20020014108
-
Publication Number
20020014108
-
Date Filed
June 27, 200123 years ago
-
Date Published
February 07, 200222 years ago
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
-
International Classifications
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method for detecting knocking combustion during the operation of an internal combustion engine with a device for measuring the ionic current, in which the raw ionic current signal or the evaluated value of the knocking intensity are normalized, which enables the value of the knocking intensity to be reliably compared with a threshold value.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a method for detecting knocking combustion in the operation of an internal combustion engine, as it is known from the publication DE 42 32 845 C2, in accordance with the preamble of patent claim 1.
[0002] In the case of externally ignited internal combustion engines, the air/fuel mixture is already ignited during the compression stroke, before the upper dead center, because of the finite propagation speed of the combustion. The optimal ignition point is thereby determined as a function of the crankshaft speed. Knocking combustion occurs as a result of premature ignition, in which excessive pressure peaks lead to an increase in the temperature of the unburned air/fuel mixture and thus to local self-ignitions of the air/fuel mixture. These excessively high pressure peaks in the combustion chambers occur as a rule during full load operation of the internal combustion engine.
[0003] In order to determine the knocking combustion, the course of the combustion chamber pressure is recorded by measuring the ionic current in all combustion chambers of the internal combustion engine. A method for measuring the ionic current is known, for example, from DE 33 27 766 A1. In which knocking combustion is detectable by the occurrence of pressure peaks and oscillations in the course of the combustion chamber pressure. To do this, an alternating voltage is fed to the spark plug, which simultaneously acts as an ionic current probe, immediately after the ignition of the air/fuel mixture via the ignition coil. This alternating voltage is modulated by ions in the burning air/fuel mixture as a function of the combustion chamber pressure. The modulated alternating voltage, the raw ionic current signal, is fed to an evaluation circuit.
[0004] The ionic current cannot be measured during the ignition of the air/fuel mixture by the spark plug. A method is described in DE 197 20 535 A1 in which the spark duration of the spark plug is reduced to a minimum in order to record the course of the combustion chamber pressure directly afterwards and to detect any knocking combustion.
[0005] DE 197 20 532 C2 discloses that, for the evaluation, the raw ionic current signal first has to be filtered through a bandpass filter. Then the part of the filtered signal not caused by knocking is masked by windowing. The remaining signal portions are rectified and then integrated. The resulting knock integral value is proportional to the intensity of the pressure peaks in the course of the combustion chamber pressure.
[0006] If knocking combustion is detected in an internal combustion engine, the ignition point for the coming work stroke is shifted within the compression stroke nearer to the upper dead center. Nevertheless, internal combustion engines develop their maximum power with light knocking, whereas with heavier knocking there is a danger of damage occurring to the internal combustion engine with the passage of time. It is thus necessary to specify a threshold value for the knocking integral value, up to which the internal combustion engine can be operated with light knocking, and from which the ignition point must be shifted towards the upper dead center.
[0007] The problem with the evaluation of an ionic current signal lies in the large fluctuations in the intensity which occur during the measurement of the ionic current signal from work stroke to work stroke.
[0008] Such fluctuations in intensity can have the effect that measured raw ionic current signals with low intensity, which have large pressure peaks and oscillations caused by knocking, give such low knock integral values that they remain below the threshold value for the knock integral, and the ignition point is thus not shifted towards the upper dead center.
[0009] Similarly, measured raw ionic current signals with high intensity, which have low pressure peaks and oscillations caused by knocking, give such high knock integral values that they lie above the threshold value for the knock integral, and the ignition point is thus shifted towards the upper dead center, as a result of which the internal combustion engine does not develop its maximum power.
[0010] In the generic publication DE 42 32 845 C2, it is recommended to form an average value in order to improve the assessment of the knock integral value, in which knock integral values are summated and divided by their number.
[0011] The disadvantage of this procedure is that whereas the knock integral values can be better assessed, the fluctuations in the intensity of the raw ionic current signal are still contained in the average value of the knock integral values.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0012] The object of the invention is to specify a method for detecting knocking combustion during the operation of an internal combustion engine which guarantees a reliable assessment of the knock integral value and which compensates for fluctuations in the intensity of the raw ionic current signal.
[0013] This task is solved according to the invention by the feature described in the characterizing clause of patent claim 1, according to which the fluctuations in the intensity of the raw ionic current signal are compensated for in the assessment of the knock integral value by normalizing the raw ionic current signal or the value of the knocking intensity.
[0014] The chronological course of the raw ionic current signal is composed first of the ignition faults, then of a first maximum of the combustion, and then of a second maximum of the ionic current which is proportional to the pressure and temperature of the combustion chamber.
[0015] To perform the normalization, an ionic current amplitude value, that is the maximum value of the second maximum of the raw ionic current signal, or an ionic current integral value, that is the value of the integrated raw ionic current signal, is determined currently from the raw ionic current signal after each combustion stroke.
[0016] Furthermore, to perform the normalization while taking average values into consideration, the quotient is formed from averaged ionic current amplitude values of the previous combustion strokes and a current ionic current amplitude value, or the quotient is formed from averaged ionic current integral values of the previous combustion strokes and a current ionic current integral value.
[0017] As normalization for the assessment of the knock integral value, the raw ionic current signal or the value of the knocking intensity is divided by the ionic current amplitude value.
[0018] Alternatively, as normalization for the assessment of the knock integral value, the raw ionic current signal or the value of the knocking intensity can be divided by the ionic current integral value.
[0019] Two additional normalizations for the assessment of the knock integral value consist of forming the quotient from the averaged ionic current amplitude value and the ionic current amplitude value multiplied by the raw ionic current signal or multiplied by the value of the knocking intensity.
[0020] Two additional alternative normalizations for the assessment of the knock integral value consist of forming the quotient from the averaged ionic current integral value and the ionic current integral value multiplied by the raw ionic current signal or multiplied by the value of the knocking intensity.
[0021] The raw ionic current signal is evaluated, at least in the process steps:
[0022] Filtering, as a result of which only the oscillations of the knocking or the ignition remain as a signal from the raw ionic current signal.
[0023] Windowing, as a result of which only the oscillations of the knocking remain as a signal.
[0024] Rectification, as a result of which negative signal values are avoided. Integration, as a result of which the knocking intensity value is formed.
[0025] In a development of the invention, it is intended to use the spark plugs of the internal combustion engine as ionic current probes.
[0026] In a further development of the invention, it is intended that the averaging of the ionic current amplitude value or of the ionic current integral value is performed as a sliding average.
[0027] To form the sliding average, the average of the ionic current amplitude or of the ionic current integral of the previous combustion strokes is subtracted from the current ionic current amplitude value or from the current ionic current integral value, this difference is multiplied by a weighting factor, and this product is then added to the average value of the ionic current amplitude or to the ionic current integral of the previous combustion strokes.
[0028] A reliable assessment of the knock integral value is provided by the method according to the invention for detecting knocking combustion during the operation of an internal combustion engine, as a result of which it is possible to operate an internal combustion engine at its maximum power.
[0029] The method for detecting knocking combustion during the operation of an internal combustion engine, in which fluctuations in the intensity of the raw ionic current signal are compensated by normalization of the raw ionic current signal or the value of the knocking intensity, is shown and explained in the following by means of embodiments and illustrated by two figures.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0030] They show:
[0031]
FIG. 1 A series of diagrams for evaluating the raw ionic current signal, in which the raw ionic current signal is normalized.
[0032]
FIG. 2 Block logic diagram for normalizing the knock integral value.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0033]
FIG. 1 contains a series of diagrams which show the course of the evaluation of the raw ionic current signal IS(t). The objective of the evaluation is to state a value, the knock integral value KI, which is proportional to the knocking intensity.
[0034] The first diagram shows the raw ionic current signal IS(t) from the ignition point ZZP as it is sensed by the spark plugs serving as ionic current probes in the combustion chambers of an internal combustion engine.
[0035] The raw ionic current signal IS(t) consists of a plurality of signal portions. Starting from the ignition point, signal portions are measured which are generally referred to as ignition faults, and which have no significance for the evaluation. After that, a first maximum is measured, which can be attributed to the combustion process. A second maximum is then measured which is proportional to the pressure and temperature of the combustion. Knocking combustion expresses itself in the form of peaks of intensity on the falling flank after the second maximum of the ionic current signal.
[0036] The second diagram shows the raw ionic current signal IS(t) after it has been filtered by means of band filters, for example a high pass. Here, d. c. voltage components are removed from the signal form, after which the filtered signal form only shows the oscillations of the combustion process and the knocking signal.
[0037] The third diagram shows the filtered signal form after the windowing, which masks the oscillations of the combustion process, and as a result of which the signal form only shows the oscillations of the knocking signal.
[0038] The fourth diagram shows the oscillation of the knocking signal after the signal form has been rectified.
[0039] The fifth diagram shows the rectified form of the oscillation of the knocking signal after it has been integrated. The value of the integration, the knock integral value KI, is a measure of the intensity of the knocking.
[0040] The investigation of combustion sequences has shown that an internal combustion engine develops its maximum power in full load operation in which low intensity knocking occurs.
[0041] Whereas this low intensity knocking does not damage the internal combustion engine in the long-term, high intensity knocking can lead to mechanical damage. It is therefore necessary to specify a threshold value for the assessment of the knock integral value up to which knocking is permitted in the internal combustion engine at full load operation without the ignition point being shifted towards the upper dead center.
[0042] Because of the chaotic nature of the combustion of the air/fuel mixture, the intensity of the form of the raw ionic current signal IS(t) and thus also the knock integral value KI vary from one combustion process of a cylinder to the next. Either the raw ionic current signal IS(t) or the knock integral value KI can be normalized to avoid errors in the assessment of the knock integral value KI in comparison to the threshold value.
[0043] Optionally, either the ionic current integral value II or the ionic current amplitude IM from the second maximum of the raw ionic current signal IS(t) is specified for the performance of the normalization.
[0044] The normalized raw ionic current signal ISn(t) can be formed optionally through the following operations:
1
[0045] The normalized knock integral value KIn can be formed optionally through the following operations:
2
[0046] Through operations 1.1 to 2.2, the current raw ionic current signal IS(t) or the current knock integral value KI is normalized in each case. The ionic current amplitude IM or the ionic current integral II can be averaged if previous raw ionic current signals IS(t) or previous knock integral values KI are also to be taken into consideration in the normalization of the raw ionic current signal IS(t) or the knock integral value KI. This averaging can be advantageously performed as sliding averaging.
[0047] In the case of sliding averaging, the average value of the ionic current amplitude {overscore (IM)} of the previous combustion stroke or the average value of the ionic current integral {overscore (II)} of the previous combustion stroke is subtracted from the current ionic current amplitude value IM or from the current ionic current integral value II, this difference is multiplied by two to minus a weighting factor k, and then this product is added to the average value of the ionic current amplitude {overscore (IM)} or the ionic current integral {overscore (II)} of the previous combustion strokes. The weighting factor k is a measure of how quickly the average value to be formed follows currently determined values, and how many previous combustion cycles are to be taken into consideration.
[0048] The normalized raw ionic current signal ISn(t), in which the previous raw ionic current signals IS(t) are taken into consideration, can be formed optionally through the following operations:
3
[0049] The normalized knock integral value KIn, in which the previous knock integral values KI are taken into consideration, can be formed optionally through the following operations:
4
[0050]
FIG. 2 shows the block logic diagram for forming the normalized knock integral value KIn from the knock integral value KI taking the deviation of the ionic current integral II from the average value of the ionic current integral {overscore (II)} into consideration.
[0051] The normalized raw ionic current signal ISn(t) or the normalized knock integral value KIn enable the internal combustion engine, on account of the reliable assessment of the knock integral value KI in comparison to the threshold value, to develop its maximum power in full load operation without the fear of damage to the internal combustion engine through too severe knocking.
Claims
- 1. Method for detecting knocking combustion during the operation of an internal combustion engine, in which a raw ionic current signal (IS(t)) is measured by an ionic current probe during the combustion stroke in the combustion chambers of the internal combustion engine, from which a value of the knocking intensity (KI) is evaluated, wherein fluctuations in the intensity of the raw ionic current signal (IS(t)) are compensated for by normalizing the raw ionic current signal (IS(t)) or the value of the knocking intensity (KI).
- 2. Method according to claim 1 wherein the chronological form of the raw ionic current signal (IS(t)) is first composed of ignition faults, then of the first maximum of the combustion, and then of a second maximum of the ionic current, and that an ionic current amplitude value (IM), that is the maximum value of the second maximum of the raw ionic current signal (IS(t)), or an ionic current integral value (II), that is the value of the integrated raw ionic current signal (IS(t)), is currently determined for performing the normalization after each combustion stroke.
- 3. Method according to claim 2 wherein, for performing the normalization, the quotient is formed from averaged ionic current amplitude values {overscore (IM)} of the previous combustion strokes and a current ionic current amplitude value (IM), or the quotient is formed from averaged ionic current integral values ({overscore (II)}) of the previous combustion strokes and a current ionic current integral value (II).
- 4. Method according to claim 2 wherein, as normalization, the raw ionic current signal (IS(t)) or the value of the knocking intensity (KI) is divided by the ionic current amplitude value (IM).
- 5. Method according to claim 2 wherein, as normalization, the raw ionic current signal (IS(t)) or the value of the knocking intensity (KI) is divided by the ionic current integral value (II).
- 6. Method according to claim 3 wherein, as normalization, the quotient from the averaged ionic current amplitude value ({overscore (IM)}) and the ionic current amplitude value (IM) is multiplied by the raw ionic current signal (IS(t)) or the value of the knocking intensity (KI).
- 7. Method according to claim 3 wherein, as normalization, the quotient from the averaged ionic current integral value ({overscore (II)}) and the ionic current integral value (II) is multiplied by the raw ionic current signal (IS(t)) or the value of the knocking intensity (KI).
- 8. Method according to claim 1 wherein the raw ionic current signal (IS(t)) is filtered, windowed, rectified and integrated to the value of the knocking intensity, the knock integral value (KI), for evaluation.
- 9. Method according to claim 1 wherein the spark plugs of the internal combustion engine are used as ionic current probes.
- 10. Method according to claim 3 wherein the averaging of the ionic current amplitude value (IM) or the ionic current integral value (II) is performed as a sliding averaging.
- 11. Method according to claim 10 wherein the average value of the ionic current amplitude value ({overscore (IM)}) or the average value of the ionic current integral ({overscore (II)}) of the previous combustion strokes are subtracted from the current ionic current amplitude value (IM) or from the current ionic current integral value (II), this difference is multiplied by a weighting factor (k), and this product is then added to the average value of the ionic current amplitude ({overscore (IM)}) or to the average value of the ionic current integral ({overscore (II)}) of the previous combustion strokes to form the sliding average.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
100 32 702.8 |
Jul 2000 |
DE |
|