This application claims the priority benefit of European Patent Application 12164690.5 filed on Apr. 19, 2012, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates to a method for detecting the cycle termination of a household tumble dryer having sensors for measuring at least two different parameters related to the drying process, for instance air temperature and clothes conductivity.
In most household tumble dryers, if an automatic cycles is selected, an algorithm chooses the cycle duration based on the signal coming from a sensor measuring a certain parameter, for instance clothes conductivity (by means for instance of metal strips) or air humidity. In other words, the signal coming from the sensor is directly correlated to the moisture content of the clothes, whose value is compared with a threshold to detect the end of the drying cycle.
Unfortunately, this known approach may suffer from several problems. For example, if clothes conductivity parameter is used, the values thereof based on signals coming from the conductivity strips are highly correlated to the water hardness, which may vary from region to region. Moreover, the conductivity value is related to the fabric type and, in case of a synthetic load, a static electricity phenomena (that often appear during the end of the cycle) may interfere with the sensor information.
Further still, the conductivity strips may provide an unreliable signal in case of small loads or in case of bulky items, because the strips simply measure the moisture of the load surface. Similarly, the information coming from air humidity sensor is affected by the accumulation of lint on the sensor surface, which may lead to inaccuracy of measurement due to its position and by occurrence of condensation on the sensor surface.
Methods for automatically detecting end of drying cycle by means of temperature information are also known. Unfortunately, these methods are affected by inaccuracy when customer desires a termination of the cycle with a relatively high remaining moisture content (e.g. to make ironing easier).
For all the above reasons, the performances of end of cycle information coming from a single sensor (e.g., a temperature sensor, a conductivity sensor or a humidity sensor) may lead to under-drying or over-drying of the clothes that respectively means unsatisfied customers, or wasted energy and time together with possible fabric damage.
It is an object of the present disclosure to provide a method to detect an end of cycle of a drying cycle that can overcome at least the above drawbacks without increasing the overall cost of the appliance and its complexity.
The above object is reached thanks to the features listed in the appended claims.
A method according to the disclosure merges the information coming from different sensors in order to avoid any energy waste and clothes damages.
A method according to the disclosure improves the cycle termination accuracy, avoids damp clothes at end of cycle that means customer dissatisfaction, and avoiding over drying that means energy waste, especially in an area close to the dry bone condition where the energy efficiency is very low.
As described above, a rough estimation of the remaining moisture content (RMC) can be obtained using separately the information coming from each sensor. A simple strategy to use all available sensors and ensure clothes to be dried could be to wait for all the sensors to detect the end of cycle condition before terminating the cycle. However this method would lead in most of the cases to an over drying of the clothes, thus wasting energy, time and damaging the fabrics.
Further advantages and features of the present disclosure will become clear from the following detailed description, provided as non limiting examples, with reference to the attached drawings in which:
With reference to
In order to accurately detect an end of cycle, disclosed methods rely on an RMC estimate obtained by merging different sensors information. Naming Condstrip the conductivity strip measurement (set equal to 0 if measurement is not available), Evaphum the humidity sensor measurement (set equal to 0 if measurement is not available), Theat and Tair the temperature measurements at the inlet 13 and at the outlet of the drum 12, respectively, an estimate RMCest of the RMC of clothes can be obtained as follows:
RMCest(k)=αTair+βTheat+γRMCest(k−1)+εCondstrip+ηEvaphum+δ
in which parameters α, β, γ, ε, η and δ are predetermined and constant during the drying process. These parameters can be computed by means of off-line optimization or using process modeling equations.
As an illustrative example, assuming for the sake of simplicity, that the air humidity measurement Evaphum is not available, the above mentioned estimator can be tuned based upon the following simplified model:
In which cpair is the specific heat capacity of the air, mfabric the mass of the fabric (it could be assumed to be equal to the rated load), {dot over (m)}air is the design air mass flow rate, hevap is the vaporization enthalpy, and μ is a coefficient identified by testing. In this simple case the coefficients can be set equal to:
in which Ts is the estimator sampling time and K is a parameter that, for example, could be set equal to the Kalman matrix (in this case a constant scalar) found using Condstrip as a measurement and RMC as the process state and process output.
A possible improvement on the accuracy of above mentioned method, especially if measurements are affected by noise, can be obtained using as input of the above equation the already filtered measurements or adding to the previous equation past values of available measurements as follows.
RMCest(k)=αTair(k)+α′T_air(k−1)+βTheat(k)+β′Theat(k−1)+γRMCest(k−1)
A further improvement of the disclosed method can be obtained using variable parameters. An easy interpretation of why the use of variable coefficients can improve estimation performances comes from the fact that it's equivalent to the use of nonlinear physics equations in the model that may describe better the system behavior and/or to the use of nonlinear state observer and/or to noise affecting the measurement that changes with time. The way parameters are modified during the drying process can be a function of time and or of the available measurements and/or of the RMC estimation and/or if available other estimates such as load mass, airflow, fabric temperature, etc.
With reference to
RMCest(k)=αEvap Rate(k)+βRMC activity(k)+γRMCest(k−1)+εCondstrip(k)+δ
In this case, the clothes moisture estimation, RMCest, is obtained by merging the information coming from the conductivity sensor, filtered DC, the RMC activity (RMCA), and the evaporation rate. The RMCA is based on the relation between the clothes moisture content and the water activity while the evaporation rate is the quantity of water that is steam in a certain amount of time. Both those quantities are computed by means of the temperature signals of drum inlet and outlet as described in the main equation. In the diagram of
The method according to the present disclosure can be used for all kinds of clothes dryers, particularly for air vent dryers, heat-pump dryers, hybrid heat pump dryers, condenser dryers etc.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12164690 | Apr 2012 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6122840 | Chbat et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141887 | Chen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
20110308103 | Bellinger et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130091728 | Morin et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1818441 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2034086 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2011077391 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for corresponding EP 12164690.5, Sep. 20, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130276324 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |