This application claims the benefit of German Application Ser. No. 102016207204.8, filed on Apr. 27, 2016, the disclosure of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present disclosure relates to a method for determining a mass of an attached implement that is articulated to a support structure of a utility vehicle.
Coupling attached implements with defined working functions to the front end of agricultural vehicles is known in the art. A front powerlift, for example, can be used for the coupling. It is often important to obtain information about the current status of a mass of the attached implement during vehicle operation in order to be able to control the agricultural activity better.
There is a need for a process of determining current status information regarding a mass of the attached implement.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, respective status information regarding a determined mass is particularly relevant for attached implements having variable load materials (e.g. agents to be sprayed, fertilizer, seed) such as sprayers, fertilizer spreaders and seeders.
The determined mass of the attached implement is a current total mass of the attached implement including the current loaded material, or a mass of the attached implement without a load material. Since the mass of the attached implement can be determined or is already known, the amount of the loaded material that has been consumed can be determined at any time during the deployment of the vehicle. From the determination of the attached implement mass, additional information can also be derived such as the dispensed mass or quantity of the loaded material per traveled distance unit (e.g. meter) of the vehicle, or a residual range of the loaded material to be dispensed. Such information can be derived with little data or calculation effort and can be made available to the vehicle driver or some other person responsible for the vehicle deployment in a suitable manner visually and/or acoustically (e.g., on a graphical user interface). Determining the mass and the information derived therefrom can therefore contribute to making the respective work deployment of the vehicle efficient and comfortable for the vehicle driver.
The mass of the attached implement is determined based on physical parameters at the front powerlift that can be determined relatively easily. At least one of the following parameters determined includes:
The above-mentioned angles can be determined by means of suitable length sensors or distance sensors. Alternatively, angle sensors can be used. For a mechanical upper link or lower link, the angle between the upper link or lower link and a vehicle horizontal line can also be determined by means of a biaxial force sensor (force measuring pin). The above-mentioned path is known and need not be further determined. Alternatively, a length sensor or distance sensor can be used to determine the path. The force impinging on the connection between the upper link and the attached implement and acting along the upper link can be determined by means of pressure sensors in the upper link. For a mechanical upper link, this force can also be determined by means of a biaxial force sensor (force sensing pin). This biaxial force sensor is arranged at a connecting point that acts as the connection between the support structure and the upper link.
The additional angles, paths and forces yet to be described can also be determined or measured by one or more of the above-mentioned sensors.
Overall, the mass of the attached implement can be determined with a small number of sensors available as standard products and therefore cost-effectively, and with a low number of sensed physical parameters. Some of the required sensors may already be present on the vehicle for other purposes, so that the expense for determining the mass of the attached implement is further reduced in such cases.
The angles formed relative to the vehicle horizontal line or the vehicle vertical line relate to a fixed vehicle coordinate system. The inclination of the support structure or the utility vehicle or the fixed vehicle coordinate system relative to the terrestrial horizontal line is taken into account here by the above-mentioned angle of inclination. The angle of inclination takes on values greater than zero when the utility vehicle is oriented uphill in the forward direction.
In particular, the utility vehicle is an agricultural vehicle such as a tractor. The support structure is a support structure of the vehicle, e.g., a frame or other supporting parts. The upper link and the lower links of the powerlift are pivotably mounted on or articulated to the support structure in order to be able to transfer the respective attached implement into different positions.
The pivotable mounting or articulation on the support structure means that the respective component is either mounted or articulated directly on the support structure itself or on a component rigidly connected to the support structure (e.g. the casing of a transmission differential block).
The front powerlift typically effects a multipoint mounting of the attached implement on the vehicle. In particular, a three point hitch is provided with which the attached implement is hitched or articulated to the support structure by means of two lower links and one upper link.
The powerlift usually contains at least one adjustable-length lifting arm in order to be able to transfer the attached implement into different positions (e.g., working position, transport position) by means of the existing lower links and upper link. The lift arms present on the powerlift are actuated at least in part in a manner (e.g., hydraulically or electrically) suitable for implementing lifting and lowering movements of the powerlift.
An adjustable-length lifting arm is advantageously used to derive one or more physical parameters for determining the mass of the attached implement. This takes into account an angle that is enclosed by a vehicle vertical line and a connecting path between two operative ends of the lifting arm. This angle is determined by means of a suitable sensor system, e.g., an angle sensor.
A pressure force acting between the two operative ends of the lifting arm is further considered for determining the mass of the attached implement. This pressure force can be determined either directly by means of a sensor system on this lifting arm or indirectly by means of a sensor system at some other suitable point of the powerlift. The sensor system includes a pressure sensor, more particularly a differential pressure sensor.
One operative end of the adjustable-length lifting arm has an articulated connection to the support structure, while an additional operative end of the lifting arm is articulated to a link-connecting point of the lower link. An additional parameter for determining the mass of the attached implement can advantageously be considered in this way. This parameter is the length of a connecting path along the lower link between the support structure and the link-connecting point. The length of this connecting path is either already known from the data for the powerlift or is determined in a suitable manner.
Individual or all adjustable-length lifting arms used in the powerlift are each constructed as a piston-cylinder unit and act in particular as hydraulic lifting cylinders, which can be coupled to a hydraulic control circuit in a technically simple manner.
The determined mass of the attached implement is advantageously also used to determine data regarding the center of gravity of the attached implement. This can support a movement control of the powerlift, e.g., for a precise transfer of the attached implement into a desired target position.
A coordinate system having an x-axis and a z-axis is defined for unambiguous determination of the center of gravity. The x-axis is oriented parallel to a longitudinal direction or a vehicle horizontal line of the utility vehicle and the z-axis is oriented parallel to a vertical direction or a vehicle vertical line of the vehicle, the x-axis and the z-axis intersecting in a zero point of the coordinate system. Thereby the data for the center of gravity can be easily determined mathematically with an unambiguous reference point. Suitable zero points can be the position of a rear axle of the vehicle, for example.
In a further embodiment, the determined data for the center of gravity of the attached implement contains the x-coordinate thereof in the above-mentioned coordinate system, whereby sufficient data for a movement control of the front powerlift and for determination of the current position of the attachment can be determined in many application cases with a small algorithmic processing effort.
The x-coordinate of the center of gravity of the attached implement is determined as a function of at least one of the following physical parameters at the powerlift:
The above-mentioned aspects of the present disclosure and the manner of obtaining them will become more apparent and the disclosure itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of the embodiments of the disclosure, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In
In the present embodiment, the articulation point C permits three different positions in the vertical direction 20 for articulating the upper link 16. The respective position is defined by a user and accordingly installed. An angle ψ is enclosed between the upper link 16 and a vehicle horizontal line 22. An angle φ is enclosed between each lower link 18 and a vehicle horizontal line 22.
The angles formed between the vehicle horizontal line 22 and a vehicle vertical line 32, particularly angles ψ and φ, relate to a fixed vehicle coordinate system 33 having an x-axis and a z-axis. The x-axis runs parallel to the longitudinal direction 24 of the utility vehicle or parallel to the vehicle horizontal line 22. The z-axis runs parallel to the vertical direction 20 of the utility vehicle or parallel to the vehicle vertical line 32. The inclination of the support structure 14, and thus of the vehicle horizontal line 22 of the utility vehicle, relative to the terrestrial horizontal line 21, is represented by an angle of inclination θ. The angle of inclination θ takes on values greater than zero when the utility vehicle is oriented uphill in the forward direction. The angle of inclination θ analogously assumes values less than zero when the utility vehicle is oriented downhill in the forward direction.
A lifting arm designed in a conventional manner as an adjustable-length lifting cylinder 26 (piston-cylinder unit) is a component of the front powerlift 12. One operative end 28 of the lifting cylinder 26 has an articulated connection to an articulation point B of the support structure 14, whereas the other operative end 30 of the lifting cylinder 26 is articulated to a link-connecting point D of the lower link 18. A connecting path between the two operative ends 28, 30 encloses an angle γ with the vehicle vertical line 32 running in the vertical direction 20. Both lower links 18 are connected to a lifting cylinder 26 in the manner described.
For mathematical/geometrical determination of a mass m and a center of gravity S of the attached implement 10, a coordinate system 33 is defined, the x-axis of which is oriented parallel to the longitudinal direction 24 and the z-axis of which is oriented parallel to the vertical direction 20. In the present embodiment of
Additional forces that impinge on the attached implement 10 are illustrated in
Based on the torque and force equilibria in
Due to the torque and force equilibria in
By inserting equations (5) and (6) into equation (1), and by solving equation (1) for the mass m of the attached implement 10, it follows that for the mass m
Thus, the mass m is determined as a function of
The lengths of paths AD and AK are known design parameters of the front powerlift 12. The force FZyl can be measured by means of a pressure sensor or differential pressure sensor in the lifting cylinder 26. The force FE can be measured by means of pressure sensors and a length sensor on the upper link 16, for example, or alternatively (in the case of a mechanical sensor 16) by means of a two-axial force sensor at the articulation point C. The angles φ, γ and ψ in equation (7) can be derived as follows:
The x-coordinates Ax, Bx and the z-coordinates Az, Bz are known since the articulation points A and B thereof on the support structure 14 have fixed coordinates relative to the coordinate system 33. The x-coordinate Cx and the z-coordinate Cz of the articulation point C are also known, and are therefore either determined by sensors or specified by the operator.
The above-mentioned angles can also be measured by means of suitable angle sensors. Alternatively, biaxial force measuring pins can be used, as illustrated with reference to angle ω and the two force components FCx (along the x-axis of the coordinate system 33) and FCz (along the z-axis of the coordinate system 33) in schematic form (see
The variable x-coordinates and z-coordinates Dx and Dz of the link-connecting point D and Ex and Ez of the articulation point E can be derived mathematically, as described below.
To calculate the connecting point D, two circles are defined. The first circle has a radius corresponding to the path BD with a circle center B and the second circle has a radius corresponding to the path AD with a circle center A. The associated circle equations are
(Dx−Ax)2+(Dz−Az)2=
The two circle equations are solved for the z component of the coordinate D. This yields a straight-line equation of a straight line running through the two circle centers, of the form
With respect to the link-connecting point D, the quadratic equation that follows by inserting the straight-line equation into one of the two circle equations.
as well as the auxiliary variables u, s and w
are defined. This yields the following equations for the x-coordinate Dx and the z-coordinate Dz:
The path BD can be measured by means of a length sensor or a distance sensor, for example.
Two additional circles are defined for calculating the articulation point E. The first circle has a radius corresponding to the path EK with a circle center K and the second circle has a radius corresponding to the path CE with a circle center C. The associated circle equations are
(Ex−Cx)2+(Ez−Cz)2=
The two circle equations are solved for the z component of the articulation point E. This yields a straight-line equation of a straight line running through the two circle centers, of the form
With respect to the articulation point E, the quadratic equation that follows by inserting the straight-line equation into one of the two circle equations
and the auxiliary variables n, b and z
are defined. This yields the following equations for the x-coordinate Ex and the z-coordinate Ez:
The path CE can also be measured by means of a length sensor or a distance sensor on the upper link 16, for example, or this path CE is known for a constant length of the upper link 16. The path EK is a defined value corresponding to the dimensioning of the attached implement 10.
The x-coordinate Sx of the center of gravity S relative to the coordinate system 33 can be determined by solving equation (4) for Sx. In this case, the angle of inclination θ is assumed to be 0°:
Thus, the x-coordinate of the center of gravity S is determined as a function of
The x-coordinate Kx and the z-coordinate Kz of the articulation point K follow from, for example
Kx=Ax+AK·cos φ and Kz=Az−AK·sin φ,
where the path AK is a known design parameter. The other components and values of equation (12) can be derived according to the above description.
While embodiments incorporating the principles of the present disclosure have been described hereinabove, the present disclosure is not limited to the described embodiments. Instead, this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the disclosure using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this disclosure pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2016 207 204 | Apr 2016 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3027029 | Clarke | Mar 1962 | A |
3635364 | Tingleff | Jan 1972 | A |
4627013 | Ichiyama | Dec 1986 | A |
4825568 | Kawamura | May 1989 | A |
6518519 | Crane, III | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6699000 | Moses | Mar 2004 | B2 |
20040200624 | Ochi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20080110647 | Guo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20100161185 | Marathe | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20150354177 | Shatters | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0892256 | Jan 1999 | EP |
2239467 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2947431 | Nov 2015 | EP |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report issued in counterpart application No. 17165908.9 dated Oct. 2, 2017. (7 pages). |
German Search Report issued in counterpart application No. 102016207204.8 dated Dec. 16, 2016. (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170315005 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |