1. Field of the Invention
The field of the invention is that of airport navigation of aircraft and more precisely that of the safety zones surrounding a machine either in its immediate environment or in its environment in the near future.
2. Description of the Prior Art
During phases when an aircraft is taxiing around an airport, to avoid any incident or collision with another aircraft, it is important that the crew have a perfect knowledge of the environment of their machine. For this purpose, the system of cockpit viewing units presents them with the situation of the surrounding traffic. The position of each aircraft can be recovered by virtue of the information provided by systems of ADS-B type signifying “Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast”. This presentation can be done in various ways.
By way of first example, it can be ensured in the so-called “HUC” head-up collimator of the machine. The most intuitive way of symbolizing the various other aircraft situated in the immediate environment of the machine is to represent them in a view compliant and/or non-compliant with their exact location. U.S. Pat. No. 7,342,514 entitled “Display of Automatic Dependent Surveillance (ADS-B) on Head-Up Display” illustrates this type of representation. Reference will be made in particular to
By way of second example, it is possible to represent in a so-called Head-Down viewing unit an aerial view of the airport zone in which the machine is situated. U.S. Pat. No. 7,194,342 entitled “Navigational instrument, method and computer program product for displaying ground traffic information” illustrates this type of representation. Reference will be made in particular to
These various approaches afford information by way of indication allowing the crew to remain vigilant. In certain situations, this information does not make it possible to monitor sufficiently precisely the behaviour of dangerous aeroplanes and therefore to comply scrupulously with the regulatory separation distances imposed on aeroplanes and vehicles at an airport.
Now, a certain number of ground collisions are due to poor assessment of the precise crowding of aeroplanes on runways. A pilot may, for example, decide to take off thinking that the runway is clear while an aeroplane still has part of its fuselage on the runway or else too close to the latter.
The aim of the invention is to offer the pilot a simple and intuitive means of avoiding this type of incident by offering him surveillance means based on targeted and precise information. The solution consists in representing the surrounding traffic using as input data not only the position of the aircraft but also additional information which makes it possible to refine the detection of conflict situations. This additional information comprises inter alia the level of precision of the location data used, the type of aircraft, its speed, its heading, its altitude. The method according to the invention is essential for refining the detection of conflict situations and thus avoiding any collisions. It also makes it possible to avoid any false alert hampering the driving of the machine.
More precisely, the subject of the invention is a method for determining a safety zone surrounding an aircraft travelling or taking off from an airport zone, the safety zone being calculated at a determined instant, characterized in that it comprises at least the following steps:
Advantageously, the method comprises a step 2 succeeding steps 0 and 1, consisting of:
Advantageously, when the aircraft has taken off, the method comprises a step 3 succeeding steps 0, 1 and 2 consisting of:
Advantageously, the method comprises a step 4 succeeding at least steps 0 and 1, consisting of:
Advantageously, the determined instant being the future time of the aircraft, the method comprises a step 5 succeeding at least steps 1 and 2, consisting of:
Advantageously, the fifth safety zone is equal to the convolution product of the first or of the second or of the fourth safety zone surrounding the aircraft with the entirety of the potential paths that may be traversed in the airport zone by the aircraft at a determined speed for a duration commencing at the present instant and finishing at the future instant.
The subject of the invention is also a cockpit viewing system comprising first means, the first means being an avionics system arranged so as to implement the previous method and a viewing device comprising at least one representation of the airport zone, of the position of the aircraft and of a safety zone surrounding the aircraft.
The invention will be better understood and other advantages will become apparent on reading the nonlimiting description which follows and be virtue of the appended figures among which:
The method according to the invention consists in determining a safety zone surrounding an aircraft travelling or taking off from an airport zone. Of course, this method requires information about the aircraft, about the airport zone and about the immediate environment of the said aircraft. These data which are available on the very great majority of modern aircraft, are detailed in the subsequent description. The method also requires calculation means which, here again, are available on modern aircraft. These calculations do not present any particular difficulties.
This method comprises at least two compulsory steps detailed hereinbelow.
Initially, in so-called Step 0, the convex envelope of the aircraft is calculated. It is obtained by joining reference points denoted PR situated at the various extremities of the machine and which correspond mainly to the front extremity of the fuselage, to the extremities of the wings and to the tailplane in such a way that the envelope obtained covers the entire surface of the machine without concave parts. These reference points PR therefore correspond to the vertices of a reference skeleton specific to each aircraft. They are all referenced with respect to a location point PL of the aircraft as representing its position in the airport zone. This point can be for example the position of the ADS-B transmitter situated in the aircraft. These reference points arise from a database containing the relative position of each of these points as well as that of the location point PL.
By way of example,
Thereafter, in step 1 of the method according to the invention, a first convex safety zone surrounding the aircraft is established, also called the probable occupancy zone or “ZOP”. Indeed, the position of the aircraft is known with a certain precision which is not negligible compared with the dimensions of the machine and which must be taken into account to establish the ZOP. Thus, the current locating systems of GPS type, the acronym standing for “Global Positioning System” have a measurement uncertainty of several meters. A simple expedient is to replace each reference point PR by a circle CPR having as centre the reference point PR and as radius R the value of the uncertainty in the exact position of the aircraft. The ZOP is thereafter calculated by linking the various circles with tangent segments.
By way of example, the reference points PR of
The aircraft can also receive the speed and the wingspan of the surrounding aeroplanes by virtue, for example, of the ADS-B system which is a signal with a coverage of 200 nautical miles and which tends to be generalized on modern aircraft.
The separation distance between two aircraft travelling around one and the same airport zone is therefore no longer calculated between their two location points but between their two respective ZOPs.
Once this first ZOP has been defined, it is beneficial to add a zone aft of the aeroplane corresponding to the blast cone of the jets, which depends on the type of aeroplane, and into which no craft may in any circumstance penetrate. By way of example,
When an aeroplane has just taken off, wake turbulence is noted on the runway a few instants after its takeoff. Other aeroplanes must not approach this turbulence. It may therefore be considered that a part of the ZOP of the aeroplane which has just taken off remains on the runway and represents this zone related to wake turbulence. Under these conditions, the ZOP of a machine is the union of the zone surrounding the aeroplane which has just taken off and of this zone representing the ground wake turbulence on the runway. This ground zone disappears once the turbulence ceases. This duration depends on the type of the aeroplane and certain takeoff parameters.
It is also possible to add to the initial ZOP a frontal safety zone defining, at any instant, the braking area required to halt the aircraft. This frontal zone is called the anticipated occupancy zone or ZOA and the union of the ZOP and of the ZOA is called the probable and anticipated occupancy zone or ZOPA. By way of illustration,
This ZOA depends:
It is possible to construct other, more complex, ZOAs taking account, for example, of the curved trajectory of an aeroplane as seen in
To decrease the times for calculating the safety distances and/or decrease the memory space required for storing the data representing the probable occupancy zones, it is possible to approximate certain parameters. Thus, by way of first example, during the calculation of the aircraft's occupancy zone, the curved trajectory of the aircraft can be regarded as a rectilinear trajectory. By way of second example, the zone can be a simple polygon consisting of straight line segments. It suffices to judiciously choose the reference points PR taken on the aircraft.
Throughout the foregoing, the safety zones are essentially defined at the present instant or in the very near future of the machine. It is also possible to define a “ZOPA” for an instant in the future of the aircraft called instant T, that is to say a zone corresponding to the various possible positions of the aircraft between the present instant and an instant in the future.
To establish this zone, it is necessary to ascertain the path or paths liable to be followed by the aircraft. These paths are determined by exploring the airport zone connectivity graph situated in front of the aircraft. It is also necessary to ascertain the envisageable speed of the aircraft. For safety, it may be beneficial to replace this envisaged speed by the permitted maximum speed of travel on the runways of an airport zone which is around thirty knots. The safety zone or ZOPA(T) is then equal to the convolution product of the ZOPA surrounding the aircraft with the path to be traversed.
Once determined, the various safety zones such as they have just been defined are presented to the crew of the aircraft by the various viewing systems present in the cockpit. It is possible, as in the various figures, to effect a representation of the ZOPAs in plan view. It is also possible to carry out representations of the ZOPAs in perspective in compliant or non-compliant mode. This depends on the type of displays used.
On these various views, it is possible to add information relating to the airport traffic, the airport, the aircraft or its travel conditions such as headings, speeds, transit times, etc.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12 01027 | Apr 2012 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5023799 | Nakayama et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
6282488 | Castor et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6420995 | Richmond et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
7194342 | Horvath et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7202776 | Breed | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7342514 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
8193948 | Shapiro et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8737684 | Meloche et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
20030093187 | Walker | May 2003 | A1 |
20090002222 | Colburn et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090115637 | Naimer et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100026554 | Longman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100079342 | Smith et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114633 | Sislak et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100198490 | Breen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100328138 | Guigne et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110213513 | Naderhirn | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231096 | Ridenour, II | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130131908 | Trepagnier et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 935 524 | Mar 2010 | FR |
Entry |
---|
French Search Report for Counterpart French Patent Application No. 1201027, 8 pgs. (Nov. 23, 2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140236470 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |