This invention relates generally to subcritical vapor compression systems that use thermostatic expansion valve devices to control compressor suction superheat and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for determining refrigerant charge adequacy in an air conditioning system.
Maintaining proper refrigerant charge level is essential to the reliable and efficient operation of an air conditioning system. Improper charge level, whether in deficit or in excess, can cause premature compressor failure and diminish system efficiency. An over-charge in the system results in compressor flooding with liquid refrigerant, and/or excessive discharge pressure, which, in turn, may be damaging to the motor and mechanical components. Inadequate refrigerant charge can lead to diminished system capacity and efficiency and potential compressor damage. Low charge also causes reduced refrigerant mass flow, decreased refrigerant pressure entering the compressor and/or an increase in refrigerant temperature entering and leaving the compressor, all of which may cause thermal over-load of the compressor. Thermal over-load of the compressor can cause degradation of the motor winding insulation, thereby bringing about premature motor failure. Additional effects of low refrigerant charge can include diminished or total loss of lubrication of mechanical components, which can lead to catastrophic compressor failure.
Charge adequacy has traditionally been checked manually by trained service technicians using pressure measurements, temperature measurements and a pressure to refrigerant temperature relationship chart for the particular refrigerant resident in the system. For refrigerant vapor compression systems which use a thermal expansion valve (TXV), the superheat of the refrigerant entering the compressor is normally regulated at a fixed value, while the amount of subcooling of the refrigerant exiting the condenser may vary. Even so, in such systems, the “subcooling method” is customarily used as an indicator for charge level. In this method, the amount of subcooling, defined as the saturated refrigerant temperature at the refrigerant pressure at the outlet of the condenser coil for the refrigerant in use, a.k.a. the refrigerant condensing temperature, minus the actual refrigerant temperature measured at the outlet of the condenser coil, is determined and compared to the manufacturer's published subcooling value for the particular air conditioning or heat pump system. Generally, an acceptable subcooling value for a subcritical refrigerant vapor compression system operating as a residential or light commercial air conditioner lies between 10 and 15° F.
Typically, the technician uses a pressure gauge to measure the refrigerant pressure at the condenser outlet and a temperature gauge to measure the refrigerant line temperature at a point downstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the condenser coil and upstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the expansion valve, generally near the exit of the condenser. With these refrigerant pressure and temperature measurements, the technician then refers to the pressure to temperature relationship chart for the refrigerant in use to determine the saturated refrigerant temperature at the measured pressure and calculates the amount of cooling actually present at the current operating conditions, that is outdoor temperature, indoor temperature, humidity, indoor airflow and the like. If the measured amount of cooling lies within the range of acceptable levels specified by the manufacturer at corresponding ambient and operating conditions, the technician considers the system properly charged. If not, the technician will adjust the refrigerant charge by either adding a quantity of refrigerant to the system or draining a quantity of refrigerant from the system, as appropriate. Methods for determining the refrigerant charge level in an air conditioning system are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,239,865; 5,987,903; 6,101,820; and 6,571,566.
As operating conditions may vary widely from day to day, the particular amount of cooling measured by the field service technician at any given time may not be truly reflective of the amount of subcooling present during “normal” operation of the system. Thus, this charging procedure is also an empirical, time-consuming, and a trial-and-error process subject to human error. Therefore, the technician may charge the system with an amount of refrigerant that is not the optimal amount charge for “normal” operating conditions, but rather with an amount of refrigerant that is merely within an acceptable tolerance of the optimal amount of charge under the operating conditions at the time the system is charged. This results in human error added to the charging of the system with refrigerant. Therefore, it is desirable to provide a method and device for automatically indicating the status of the refrigerant charge within an operating system over a wide range of actual operating conditions. It is also desirable to provide a visual interface in association with such a device to indicate whether or not the system is properly charged.
It is an object of the invention to provide a method for determining the adequacy of refrigerant charge in a subcritical refrigerant vapor compression system.
It is an object of one aspect of the invention to provide a method for determining the adequacy of refrigerant charge in a subcritical refrigerant vapor compression system taking both instantaneous subcooling values and average subcooling values into consideration.
A method is provided for determining the adequacy of refrigerant charge in a subcritical refrigerant vapor compression system having a compressor, a condenser coil, an expansion device and an evaporator coil connected in serial relationship in refrigerant flow circuit. The method includes the steps of: sensing the pressure of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is normally in a liquid only state with the system operating and generating a first signal indicative of the sensed refrigerant pressure; sensing the temperature of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is in a liquid only state and generating a second signal indicative of the sensed refrigerant temperature; calculating in real-time a value for the degrees of subcooling present based upon the sensed refrigerant pressure and the sensed refrigerant temperature; storing the calculated instantaneous value for the degrees of subcooling in a dedicated data location associated with the sensed refrigerant temperature; accumulating the calculated instantaneous value for the degrees of subcooling associated with each respective sensed refrigerant temperature within the respective data location associated with the respective sensed refrigerant temperature; calculating an average value for the degrees of subcooling present based upon the accumulated instantaneous values for the degrees of subcooling; determining a system refrigerant charge status based upon a consideration of both the instantaneous value for the degree of subcooling and the average value for the degree of subcooling; and outputting an indication of a refrigerant charge status.
The step of sensing the pressure of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is in a liquid state only may include sensing the pressure of the refrigerant leaving the condenser coil and the step of sensing the temperature of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is in a liquid state only may include sensing the temperature of the refrigerant at a location downstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the condenser coil and upstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the expansion device.
In an embodiment, the step of determining a system refrigerant charge status includes the steps of determining whether the instantaneous subcooling value is within a first degrees of tolerance of a first target subcooling value; and determining whether the average subcooling value is within a second degrees of tolerance of a second target subcooling value. The first degrees of tolerance may exceed the second degrees of tolerance, and the first subcooling target and the second subcooling target may be the same degrees of subcooling.
In an embodiment of the method of the invention, the step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status may comprise indicating that the refrigerant charge should be checked. A indication that the refrigerant charge should be checked may be outputted if both the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than an instantaneous subcooling target value plus a first degrees of tolerance and the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value plus a second degrees of tolerance, or if the average subcooling value is less than the average subcooling target value minus the second degrees of tolerance.
In an embodiment of the method of the invention, the step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status may include the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is correct if both the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than an instantaneous subcooling target value minus a first degrees of tolerance and less than the instantaneous subcooling target value plus the first degrees of tolerance and the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value minus a second degrees of tolerance and less than the average subcooling target value plus the second degrees of tolerance. The step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status may also include the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is correct if the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value minus a second degrees of tolerance and less than the average subcooling target value plus a second degrees of tolerance, and the instantaneous subcooling value is either not stable or not available.
The step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status may include the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is low if the instantaneous subcooling value is less than an instantaneous subcooling target value minus a first degrees of subcooling or if the average subcooling value is less than an average subcooling target value minus a second degrees of tolerance. The step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status may include the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is high if the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than an instantaneous subcooling target value plus a first degrees of subcooling or if the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value plus a second degrees of tolerance.
For a further understanding of these and objects of the invention, reference will be made to the following detailed description of the invention which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawing, wherein:
Referring now to
After evaporation, the refrigerant vapor is drawn through the refrigerant circuit back to the compressor 11 wherein the refrigerant vapor is pressurized. The resulting hot, high-pressure vapor is circulated through the refrigerant circuit to the condenser wherein it passes through the condenser coil 12 in heat exchange relationship with ambient temperature outdoor air being passed over the condenser coil 12 by the condenser fan 18. As the outdoor air passes through the condenser over the condenser coil 12, the refrigerant rejects heat to the outdoor air passing over, thereby heating the air and condensing the high pressure refrigerant vapor to a high pressure liquid refrigerant. The high pressure liquid refrigerant leaving the condenser passes on through the refrigerant circuit traversing the expansion valve 13 wherein the high pressure refrigerant liquid is expanded to a lower temperature, lower pressure liquid, typically to a saturated liquid refrigerant before it enters the evaporator coil 14.
It should be understood that the expansion device 13 may be a valve such as a thermostatic expansion valve (TXV) or an electronic expansion valve (DCV) which regulates the amount of liquid refrigerant entering the evaporator coil 14 in response to the superheat condition of the refrigerant entering the compressor 11. It is also to be understood that the invention is equally applicable for use in association with other refrigerant vapor compression systems such as heat pump systems. In a heat pump, during cooling mode, the process is identical to that as described hereinabove. In the heating mode, the cycle is reversed with the condenser and evaporator of the cooling mode acting as an evaporator and condenser, respectively.
A pair of sensors 20 and 30 is provided in operative association with the refrigerant circuit to measure variables needed for assessing the charge level in refrigerant vapor compression system 10. The sensor 20 is disposed in operative association with the refrigerant circuit to measure the refrigerant liquid pressure, Pliquid, in the refrigerant circuit at or closely downstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the outlet of the condenser coil 12. The sensor 30 is disposed in operative association with the refrigerant circuit to measure the refrigerant liquid temperature, Tliquid, downstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the outlet of the condenser coil 12 and upstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the expansion valve 13.
The pressure sensor 20 may be a conventional pressure measuring device, such as for example a pressure transducer, and the temperature sensor 30 may be a conventional temperature sensor, such as for example a thermocouple, thermistor, or the like, mounted on the refrigerant line through which the refrigerant is circulating. The selection of the particular type of liquid line pressure sensor and liquid line temperature sensor employed is a matter of choice within the ordinary skill of the skilled practitioner in the art and is not limiting of or germane to the invention. The location of the liquid line pressure sensor 20 and the liquid line temperature sensor 30 is important. The liquid line pressure and temperature sensors 20, 30 must be located on the refrigerant line at a location in the refrigerant circuit whereat the refrigerant will normally be in a liquid state, not a vapor state or a mixed liquid/vapor state when the unit is operating when near or above normal refrigerant charge levels.
Referring now also to
The microprocessor 40 processes the digital output signals indicative of the measured refrigerant liquid line pressure and the refrigerant liquid line temperature and stores the processed data in a memory unit 42 in data communication with the microprocessor 40. The memory unit may be a ROM, an EPROM or other suitable data storage device. The memory unit 42 is preprogrammed with the pressure to temperature relationship charts characteristic of at least the refrigerant in use in the system 10. The microprocessor 40 reads the saturated liquid temperature, TLsat, for the refrigerant in use at the measured pressure, Pliquid. Knowing the saturated liquid temperature, at block 302, the microprocessor 40 calculates the actual degrees of subcooling, SC, using the following relationship:
SC=TLsat−TLiquid.
The microcontroller 40 includes a plurality of designated data storage bins 43 for storing these calculated subcooling values with a separate data storage bin being designated to receive and store the data relating to a particular liquid line temperature. The microprocessor 40, at block 304, stores each calculated degrees of subcooling value in the memory unit 42 in the respective bin designated for data obtained at the respective measured refrigerant liquid line temperature at which that subcooling value was calculated.
As the ambient operating conditions, e.g. outdoor temperature, outdoor humidity, indoor temperature and indoor humidity, etc., the amount of subcooling present at any given time during operation of the system 10 will vary over time. If these operating conditions vary widely, the amount of subcooling experienced during operation of the system 10 will also vary over a wide range. Thus, the amount of subcooling at any given point of operation may not be reflective of the true adequacy or inadequacy of the refrigerant charge over the full range of operating conditions experienced by the system 10 over a period of time.
Accordingly, at periodic time intervals during system operation, the microprocessor 40 gathers the output signals from the aforementioned sensors processes the signals received to calculate the subcooling value as hereinbefore described. Over time, the microprocessor 40, at block 306, stores a plurality of subcooling values for each respective value of liquid line temperature in the designated data storage bin for that value of liquid line temperature. To ensure an accurate subcooling calculation, the microprocessor 40 only processes data gathered from the aforementioned sensors when the system 10 is operating in a steady-state condition at any particular point in operation. Therefore, the microprocessor 40 is configured to monitor the rate of change of each of the received signals from the analog-to-digital converters 22 and 32 associated respectively with the sensors 20 and 30 to filter out transient data.
When the rate of change of each of the signals 21D, and 31D drops below a preselected threshold indicative of steady-state operation, the microprocessor 40 will then process the received signals to calculate the degrees of subcooling at the measured liquid line temperature at the current system operating conditions and stores that calculated subcooling value in the respective storage bin associated with the measured liquid line temperature. Each storage bin is provided with a limited number of storage points and the data stored in each storage bin is arranged in a conventional “ring” fashion. In this arrangement, once all storage points within the bin have been filled, the next subcooling value received for storage in that particular bin will replace the oldest in time subcooling value stored therein. Therefore, only the most current data will be used in determining the adequacy of the refrigerant charge present in the system 10. Additionally, a memory reset device, for example a momentary switch, may be provided to clear all the subcooling values and related data from the data storage bins. At the discretion of the service technician, the memory reset device maybe activated to clear the microprocessor memory after the system has been serviced, the refrigerant charge adjusted as needed or when a system fault has occurred which renders the stored subcooling history unwanted. Clearing the microprocessor memory prevents old or unreliable subcooling values and other data from influencing future charge adequacy determinations after the system has been serviced.
To further ensure the accuracy of the refrigerant charge adequacy determinations, the microprocessor 40 uses liquid line temperature signal 21D as an indicator of the outdoor ambient air temperature. If the liquid line temperature drops below a preselected first low temperature threshold value, for example 70° F., the microprocessor 40 uses a wider threshold tolerances to determine satisfactory refrigerant charge. If the liquid line temperature drops below a second lower threshold value, for example 55° F., the received data is not stored or processed and the microprocessor 40 will not perform any subcooling calculations.
In addition to storing the calculated “instantaneous” subcooling values in association with the sensed liquid line temperature at a particular point of operation, the microprocessor 40 also includes a conventional control circuit for integrating the stored instantaneous values of degrees of subcooling over a selected period of time to provide an average amount of subcooling over that selected time period. The microprocessor 40, at block 308, calculates the average subcooling (ASC) value associated with that particular liquid line temperature (LLT) based upon all the instantaneous subcooling values stored within that respective bin.
In the method of the invention, the microprocessor uses both the instantaneous subcooling and the average subcooling values in determining the adequacy of the system's refrigerant charge at block 310, and otputs anindication of the system refrigerant charge status at block 320. To determine level of charge adequacy, the microprocessor 40 compares the calculated instantaneous subcooling (ISC) value to a first target value, TARI, and also compares the calculated average subcooling value to a second target value, TARA. For the refrigerant charge to be deemed adequate, the calculated instantaneous subcooling value must lie within a specified tolerance, TOLI, of the first target value, TARI, and the calculated average subcooling value must lie within a specified tolerance, TOLA, of the second target valve, TARA. In an embodiment of the method of the invention, TARI and TARA are the same value, and TOLI is greater than TOLA, that is the tolerance TOLI associated with the instantaneous subcooling value is relatively wider than the tolerance TOLA associated with the average subcooling value.
As discussed, the refrigerant charge in the system 10 is deemed adequate, i.e. correct, if, and only if, both the calculated instantaneous subcooling value and the calculated average subcooling value are within their respective tolerance of their respective target subcooling value. If the average subcooling value falls below the value of TARA−TOLA and/or the instantaneous subcooling valve falls below the value of TARI−TOLI, the refrigerant charge is deemed low, i.e. an undercharge condition exists. However, if the average subcooling value is above the value of TARA+TOLA and/or the instantaneous subcooling valve is above the value of TARI+TOLI, the refrigerant charge is deemed high, i.e. an overcharge condition exists.
In the embodiment depicted in
Referring now to
In the embodiment depicted in
Referring now to Table H and
For a number of reasons, including human error, it is very difficult to charge a newly installed air conditioning system with the proper level of refrigerant charge. Thus, when initially charging a system, the field service technician will charge the system upon installation with an amount of refrigerant that results in a value for the degrees of subcooling that falls within a tolerance of a target value for degrees of subcooling at the current operating conditions. In a system incorporating the present invention, the microprocessor 40 will monitor the refrigerant liquid line pressure, the refrigeration liquid line temperature and the outdoor ambient air temperature to calculated the actual subcooling and provide an indication of the refrigeration charge adequacy based upon an analysis of the calculated subcooling values relative to preselected target subcooling values for that particular system. To ensure an accurate determination of refrigeration charge adequacy, the method of the present invention filters data from the sensors to eliminate non-steady state operating conditions from consideration, bases the average subcooling calculations on the most current data available, and takes both the instantaneous subcooling value and the average subcooling value into account in determining the adequacy of the system refrigeration charge.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment as illustrated in the drawings, it will be understood by one skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be effected therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims. In particular, the present invention includes the equivalence of software and hardware in digital computing and the equivalence of digital and analog hardware in producing a particular output signal.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2006/048689 | 12/20/2006 | WO | 00 | 12/4/2009 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2008/079111 | 7/3/2008 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2883255 | Anderson | Apr 1959 | A |
| 3321613 | Searle | May 1967 | A |
| 4114448 | Merritt | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4304126 | Yelke | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4325223 | Cantley | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4381549 | Stamp, Jr. et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4429578 | Darrel et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4510576 | MacArthur et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4541284 | Guagliumi et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4546616 | Drucker | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4561261 | Kornrumpf et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4624112 | Proctor | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4677830 | Sumikawa et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4745519 | Breidegam | May 1988 | A |
| 4798055 | Murray et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4805416 | Manz et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4829777 | Matsuoka et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4841734 | Torrence | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4856288 | Weber | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4982576 | Proctor et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5016472 | Amrhein et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5046322 | Bulla et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5057965 | Wilson | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5079930 | Beaverson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5156012 | Kuribara et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5186012 | Czachorski et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5206963 | Wiens | May 1993 | A |
| 5214918 | Oguni et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5228304 | Ryan | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5239865 | Salzer et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| H1226 | VanReenen et al. | Sep 1993 | H |
| 5241833 | Ohkoshi | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5248168 | Chichester et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5251453 | Stanke et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5295360 | Olds et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5317903 | McClelland et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5341649 | Nevitt et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5354103 | Torrence et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5362530 | Kitami et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5374084 | Potokar | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5381669 | Bahel et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5406980 | Allread et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5413147 | Moreiras et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5423189 | Nicol et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5425558 | Dennany, Jr. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5430692 | Grupp et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5463377 | Kronberg | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5464042 | Haunhorst | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5468028 | Olson | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5474336 | Hoff et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5481884 | Scoccia | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5540463 | Potokar | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5560213 | Wieszt | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5586445 | Bessler | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5647222 | Sarakinis | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5694778 | Wilson | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5752726 | Fixemer | May 1998 | A |
| 5807332 | Augustine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5834943 | Miller | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5860286 | Tulpule | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5868437 | Teague | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5961157 | Baron et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5987903 | Bathla | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6012743 | Godeau et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6045742 | McGrevy | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6101820 | Cheballah | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6155612 | Szabo | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6161394 | Alsenz | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6179214 | Key et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6209338 | Thatcher, Jr. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6302654 | Millet et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308523 | Scaringe | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6324854 | Jayanth | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6330802 | Cummings et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6354332 | Burkhardt et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6382678 | Field et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6442953 | Trigiani et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6460354 | Yabuki et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6463747 | Temple | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470695 | Gong | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6481756 | Field et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6497435 | Luft et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6546823 | Veit | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6550341 | van Schoor et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6553774 | Ishio et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6571566 | Temple et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6594554 | Seem et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6658373 | Rossi et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6708508 | Demuth et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6735964 | Perkovich et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6758051 | Jayanth et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6769258 | Pierson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6843070 | Suharno | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6868678 | Mei et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6964173 | Dobmeier et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6981384 | Dobmeier et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7079967 | Rossi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7146290 | Triginai et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7146819 | Demuth et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7386985 | Concha et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7752855 | Matsuoka et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 20020024218 | Manuli | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083723 | Demuth et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020096209 | Danielson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020112490 | Gong | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020121100 | Yabuki et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020139128 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020141877 | Jayanth et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020182005 | Milhas | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030055603 | Rossi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030089119 | Pham et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172665 | Matsuoka et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182950 | Mei et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226367 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040111239 | Rossi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040159114 | Demuth et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050204756 | Dobmeier et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050235755 | Hindman | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20070125102 | Concha et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080209926 | Matsuoka et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20100089076 | Schuster et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0159281 | Oct 1985 | EP |
| 0289369 | Nov 1988 | EP |
| 0308160 | Mar 1989 | EP |
| 0396029 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0409000 | Jan 1991 | EP |
| 0453302 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 0529758 | Mar 1993 | EP |
| 0550263 | Jul 1993 | EP |
| 0760069 | Mar 1997 | EP |
| 0843794 | May 1998 | EP |
| 0918182 | May 1999 | EP |
| 1238838 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 1337825 | Aug 2003 | EP |
| 2667570 | Apr 1992 | FR |
| 2274695 | Aug 1994 | GB |
| 62218748 | Sep 1987 | JP |
| 62261845 | Nov 1987 | JP |
| 63302238 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| 2110268 | Apr 1990 | JP |
| 2195165 | Aug 1990 | JP |
| 455671 | Feb 1992 | JP |
| 4190062 | Jul 1992 | JP |
| 4273941 | Sep 1992 | JP |
| 599475 | Apr 1993 | JP |
| 5231754 | Sep 1993 | JP |
| 5256543 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 755299 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| 868576 | Mar 1996 | JP |
| 8261542 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 8261543 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 20009048 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2000154954 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 200132884 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| 2001141279 | May 2001 | JP |
| WO-9320376 | Oct 1993 | WO |
| WO-9530106 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO-9530107 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO-9533157 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO-9617202 | Jun 1996 | WO |
| WO-9712167 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO-9713994 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO-9713995 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO-9747908 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO-0045053 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO-0123794 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100088046 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |