Method for determining refrigerant charge

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8290722
  • Patent Number
    8,290,722
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 20, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 16, 2012
    13 years ago
Abstract
A method for determining the adequacy of the refrigerant charge in an air conditioning system based upon both the instantaneous degree of subcooling present in the liquid refrigerant in the refrigerant line at a location whereat only liquid refrigerant is present and a calculated average subcooling value based upon accumulated instantaneous subcooling values. The adequacy of the refrigerant charge in the system may be indicated by an alert indicating “check charge” or by a series of lights including a first indicator light indicating that the refrigerant charge is low, a second indicator light indicating that the refrigerant charge is high, and a third indicator light indicating that the refrigerant charge is correct.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to subcritical vapor compression systems that use thermostatic expansion valve devices to control compressor suction superheat and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for determining refrigerant charge adequacy in an air conditioning system.


Maintaining proper refrigerant charge level is essential to the reliable and efficient operation of an air conditioning system. Improper charge level, whether in deficit or in excess, can cause premature compressor failure and diminish system efficiency. An over-charge in the system results in compressor flooding with liquid refrigerant, and/or excessive discharge pressure, which, in turn, may be damaging to the motor and mechanical components. Inadequate refrigerant charge can lead to diminished system capacity and efficiency and potential compressor damage. Low charge also causes reduced refrigerant mass flow, decreased refrigerant pressure entering the compressor and/or an increase in refrigerant temperature entering and leaving the compressor, all of which may cause thermal over-load of the compressor. Thermal over-load of the compressor can cause degradation of the motor winding insulation, thereby bringing about premature motor failure. Additional effects of low refrigerant charge can include diminished or total loss of lubrication of mechanical components, which can lead to catastrophic compressor failure.


Charge adequacy has traditionally been checked manually by trained service technicians using pressure measurements, temperature measurements and a pressure to refrigerant temperature relationship chart for the particular refrigerant resident in the system. For refrigerant vapor compression systems which use a thermal expansion valve (TXV), the superheat of the refrigerant entering the compressor is normally regulated at a fixed value, while the amount of subcooling of the refrigerant exiting the condenser may vary. Even so, in such systems, the “subcooling method” is customarily used as an indicator for charge level. In this method, the amount of subcooling, defined as the saturated refrigerant temperature at the refrigerant pressure at the outlet of the condenser coil for the refrigerant in use, a.k.a. the refrigerant condensing temperature, minus the actual refrigerant temperature measured at the outlet of the condenser coil, is determined and compared to the manufacturer's published subcooling value for the particular air conditioning or heat pump system. Generally, an acceptable subcooling value for a subcritical refrigerant vapor compression system operating as a residential or light commercial air conditioner lies between 10 and 15° F.


Typically, the technician uses a pressure gauge to measure the refrigerant pressure at the condenser outlet and a temperature gauge to measure the refrigerant line temperature at a point downstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the condenser coil and upstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the expansion valve, generally near the exit of the condenser. With these refrigerant pressure and temperature measurements, the technician then refers to the pressure to temperature relationship chart for the refrigerant in use to determine the saturated refrigerant temperature at the measured pressure and calculates the amount of cooling actually present at the current operating conditions, that is outdoor temperature, indoor temperature, humidity, indoor airflow and the like. If the measured amount of cooling lies within the range of acceptable levels specified by the manufacturer at corresponding ambient and operating conditions, the technician considers the system properly charged. If not, the technician will adjust the refrigerant charge by either adding a quantity of refrigerant to the system or draining a quantity of refrigerant from the system, as appropriate. Methods for determining the refrigerant charge level in an air conditioning system are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,239,865; 5,987,903; 6,101,820; and 6,571,566.


As operating conditions may vary widely from day to day, the particular amount of cooling measured by the field service technician at any given time may not be truly reflective of the amount of subcooling present during “normal” operation of the system. Thus, this charging procedure is also an empirical, time-consuming, and a trial-and-error process subject to human error. Therefore, the technician may charge the system with an amount of refrigerant that is not the optimal amount charge for “normal” operating conditions, but rather with an amount of refrigerant that is merely within an acceptable tolerance of the optimal amount of charge under the operating conditions at the time the system is charged. This results in human error added to the charging of the system with refrigerant. Therefore, it is desirable to provide a method and device for automatically indicating the status of the refrigerant charge within an operating system over a wide range of actual operating conditions. It is also desirable to provide a visual interface in association with such a device to indicate whether or not the system is properly charged.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the invention to provide a method for determining the adequacy of refrigerant charge in a subcritical refrigerant vapor compression system.


It is an object of one aspect of the invention to provide a method for determining the adequacy of refrigerant charge in a subcritical refrigerant vapor compression system taking both instantaneous subcooling values and average subcooling values into consideration.


A method is provided for determining the adequacy of refrigerant charge in a subcritical refrigerant vapor compression system having a compressor, a condenser coil, an expansion device and an evaporator coil connected in serial relationship in refrigerant flow circuit. The method includes the steps of: sensing the pressure of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is normally in a liquid only state with the system operating and generating a first signal indicative of the sensed refrigerant pressure; sensing the temperature of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is in a liquid only state and generating a second signal indicative of the sensed refrigerant temperature; calculating in real-time a value for the degrees of subcooling present based upon the sensed refrigerant pressure and the sensed refrigerant temperature; storing the calculated instantaneous value for the degrees of subcooling in a dedicated data location associated with the sensed refrigerant temperature; accumulating the calculated instantaneous value for the degrees of subcooling associated with each respective sensed refrigerant temperature within the respective data location associated with the respective sensed refrigerant temperature; calculating an average value for the degrees of subcooling present based upon the accumulated instantaneous values for the degrees of subcooling; determining a system refrigerant charge status based upon a consideration of both the instantaneous value for the degree of subcooling and the average value for the degree of subcooling; and outputting an indication of a refrigerant charge status.


The step of sensing the pressure of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is in a liquid state only may include sensing the pressure of the refrigerant leaving the condenser coil and the step of sensing the temperature of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is in a liquid state only may include sensing the temperature of the refrigerant at a location downstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the condenser coil and upstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the expansion device.


In an embodiment, the step of determining a system refrigerant charge status includes the steps of determining whether the instantaneous subcooling value is within a first degrees of tolerance of a first target subcooling value; and determining whether the average subcooling value is within a second degrees of tolerance of a second target subcooling value. The first degrees of tolerance may exceed the second degrees of tolerance, and the first subcooling target and the second subcooling target may be the same degrees of subcooling.


In an embodiment of the method of the invention, the step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status may comprise indicating that the refrigerant charge should be checked. A indication that the refrigerant charge should be checked may be outputted if both the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than an instantaneous subcooling target value plus a first degrees of tolerance and the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value plus a second degrees of tolerance, or if the average subcooling value is less than the average subcooling target value minus the second degrees of tolerance.


In an embodiment of the method of the invention, the step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status may include the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is correct if both the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than an instantaneous subcooling target value minus a first degrees of tolerance and less than the instantaneous subcooling target value plus the first degrees of tolerance and the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value minus a second degrees of tolerance and less than the average subcooling target value plus the second degrees of tolerance. The step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status may also include the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is correct if the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value minus a second degrees of tolerance and less than the average subcooling target value plus a second degrees of tolerance, and the instantaneous subcooling value is either not stable or not available.


The step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status may include the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is low if the instantaneous subcooling value is less than an instantaneous subcooling target value minus a first degrees of subcooling or if the average subcooling value is less than an average subcooling target value minus a second degrees of tolerance. The step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status may include the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is high if the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than an instantaneous subcooling target value plus a first degrees of subcooling or if the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value plus a second degrees of tolerance.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a further understanding of these and objects of the invention, reference will be made to the following detailed description of the invention which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawing, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an first exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a second exemplary embodiment of the present invention;



FIGS. 3A and 3B together form a process flow block diagram illustrating an embodiment of the method disclosed herein for indicating the level of refrigerant charge in a refrigerant vapor compression system;



FIG. 4 is a process flow block diagram illustrating an embodiment of determining a system refrigerant charge status and outputting an indication of the system refrigerant charge status in accordance with the method disclosed herein;



FIG. 5 is a process flow block diagram illustrating another embodiment of determining a system refrigerant charge status and outputting an indication of the system refrigerant charge status in accordance with the method disclosed herein;



FIG. 6 is a process flow block diagram illustrating another embodiment of determining a system refrigerant charge status and outputting an indication of the system refrigerant charge status in accordance with the method disclosed herein;



FIG. 7 is a process flow block diagram illustrating another embodiment of determining a system refrigerant charge status and outputting an indication of the system refrigerant charge status in accordance with the method disclosed herein;



FIG. 8 is a process flow block diagram illustrating another embodiment of determining a system refrigerant charge status and outputting an indication of the system refrigerant charge status in accordance with the method disclosed herein; and



FIG. 9 is a process flow block diagram illustrating another embodiment of determining a system refrigerant charge status and outputting an indication of the system refrigerant charge status in accordance with the method disclosed herein.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring now to FIG. 1, the invention is shown generally as incorporated into a refrigerant vapor compression air conditioning system 10 having a compressor 11, a condenser coil 12, an expansion device 13 and an evaporator coil 14 connected in serial relationship in refrigerant flow communication in a conventional manner via refrigerant lines forming a refrigerant flow circuit. In operation, the refrigerant, for example R12, R22, R134a, R404A, R410A, R407C, R717 or other compressible fluid, circulating through the refrigerant circuit passes through the evaporator coil 14 in the evaporator in heat exchange relationship with indoor air being passed over the evaporator coil 14 by the evaporator fan 16. As the indoor air passes through the evaporator and over the evaporator coil 14, the refrigerant absorbs the heat in the indoor air passing over the evaporator coil, thereby cooling the air and evaporating the refrigerant. The cooled air is circulated by the fan 16 back into the indoor area to be cooled.


After evaporation, the refrigerant vapor is drawn through the refrigerant circuit back to the compressor 11 wherein the refrigerant vapor is pressurized. The resulting hot, high-pressure vapor is circulated through the refrigerant circuit to the condenser wherein it passes through the condenser coil 12 in heat exchange relationship with ambient temperature outdoor air being passed over the condenser coil 12 by the condenser fan 18. As the outdoor air passes through the condenser over the condenser coil 12, the refrigerant rejects heat to the outdoor air passing over, thereby heating the air and condensing the high pressure refrigerant vapor to a high pressure liquid refrigerant. The high pressure liquid refrigerant leaving the condenser passes on through the refrigerant circuit traversing the expansion valve 13 wherein the high pressure refrigerant liquid is expanded to a lower temperature, lower pressure liquid, typically to a saturated liquid refrigerant before it enters the evaporator coil 14.


It should be understood that the expansion device 13 may be a valve such as a thermostatic expansion valve (TXV) or an electronic expansion valve (DCV) which regulates the amount of liquid refrigerant entering the evaporator coil 14 in response to the superheat condition of the refrigerant entering the compressor 11. It is also to be understood that the invention is equally applicable for use in association with other refrigerant vapor compression systems such as heat pump systems. In a heat pump, during cooling mode, the process is identical to that as described hereinabove. In the heating mode, the cycle is reversed with the condenser and evaporator of the cooling mode acting as an evaporator and condenser, respectively.


A pair of sensors 20 and 30 is provided in operative association with the refrigerant circuit to measure variables needed for assessing the charge level in refrigerant vapor compression system 10. The sensor 20 is disposed in operative association with the refrigerant circuit to measure the refrigerant liquid pressure, Pliquid, in the refrigerant circuit at or closely downstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the outlet of the condenser coil 12. The sensor 30 is disposed in operative association with the refrigerant circuit to measure the refrigerant liquid temperature, Tliquid, downstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the outlet of the condenser coil 12 and upstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the expansion valve 13.


The pressure sensor 20 may be a conventional pressure measuring device, such as for example a pressure transducer, and the temperature sensor 30 may be a conventional temperature sensor, such as for example a thermocouple, thermistor, or the like, mounted on the refrigerant line through which the refrigerant is circulating. The selection of the particular type of liquid line pressure sensor and liquid line temperature sensor employed is a matter of choice within the ordinary skill of the skilled practitioner in the art and is not limiting of or germane to the invention. The location of the liquid line pressure sensor 20 and the liquid line temperature sensor 30 is important. The liquid line pressure and temperature sensors 20, 30 must be located on the refrigerant line at a location in the refrigerant circuit whereat the refrigerant will normally be in a liquid state, not a vapor state or a mixed liquid/vapor state when the unit is operating when near or above normal refrigerant charge levels.


Referring now also to FIGS. 3A and 3B, there is depicted a process flow block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of the method disclosed herein. In operation, the pressure sensor 20, at block 300A, generates and sends an analog voltage signal 21A to an analog-to-digital converter 22 indicative of the measured refrigerant liquid line pressure, Pliquid, and the temperature sensor 30, at block 300B, generates and sends an analog voltage signal 31A to an analog-to-digital converter 32 indicative of the measured refrigerant liquid line temperature, Tliquid. The analog-to-digital converter 22 converts the analog signal 21A received from the pressure sensor 20 into a digital signal 21D and outputs the resulting digital signal indicative of the measured refrigerant liquid line pressure to a microprocessor 40. Similarly, the analog-to-digital converter 32 converts the analog signal 31A received from the temperature sensor 30 into a digital signal 31D and outputs that digital signal indicative of the measured refrigerant liquid line temperature to the microprocessor 40.


The microprocessor 40 processes the digital output signals indicative of the measured refrigerant liquid line pressure and the refrigerant liquid line temperature and stores the processed data in a memory unit 42 in data communication with the microprocessor 40. The memory unit may be a ROM, an EPROM or other suitable data storage device. The memory unit 42 is preprogrammed with the pressure to temperature relationship charts characteristic of at least the refrigerant in use in the system 10. The microprocessor 40 reads the saturated liquid temperature, TLsat, for the refrigerant in use at the measured pressure, Pliquid. Knowing the saturated liquid temperature, at block 302, the microprocessor 40 calculates the actual degrees of subcooling, SC, using the following relationship:

SC=TLsat−TLiquid.

The microcontroller 40 includes a plurality of designated data storage bins 43 for storing these calculated subcooling values with a separate data storage bin being designated to receive and store the data relating to a particular liquid line temperature. The microprocessor 40, at block 304, stores each calculated degrees of subcooling value in the memory unit 42 in the respective bin designated for data obtained at the respective measured refrigerant liquid line temperature at which that subcooling value was calculated.


As the ambient operating conditions, e.g. outdoor temperature, outdoor humidity, indoor temperature and indoor humidity, etc., the amount of subcooling present at any given time during operation of the system 10 will vary over time. If these operating conditions vary widely, the amount of subcooling experienced during operation of the system 10 will also vary over a wide range. Thus, the amount of subcooling at any given point of operation may not be reflective of the true adequacy or inadequacy of the refrigerant charge over the full range of operating conditions experienced by the system 10 over a period of time.


Accordingly, at periodic time intervals during system operation, the microprocessor 40 gathers the output signals from the aforementioned sensors processes the signals received to calculate the subcooling value as hereinbefore described. Over time, the microprocessor 40, at block 306, stores a plurality of subcooling values for each respective value of liquid line temperature in the designated data storage bin for that value of liquid line temperature. To ensure an accurate subcooling calculation, the microprocessor 40 only processes data gathered from the aforementioned sensors when the system 10 is operating in a steady-state condition at any particular point in operation. Therefore, the microprocessor 40 is configured to monitor the rate of change of each of the received signals from the analog-to-digital converters 22 and 32 associated respectively with the sensors 20 and 30 to filter out transient data.


When the rate of change of each of the signals 21D, and 31D drops below a preselected threshold indicative of steady-state operation, the microprocessor 40 will then process the received signals to calculate the degrees of subcooling at the measured liquid line temperature at the current system operating conditions and stores that calculated subcooling value in the respective storage bin associated with the measured liquid line temperature. Each storage bin is provided with a limited number of storage points and the data stored in each storage bin is arranged in a conventional “ring” fashion. In this arrangement, once all storage points within the bin have been filled, the next subcooling value received for storage in that particular bin will replace the oldest in time subcooling value stored therein. Therefore, only the most current data will be used in determining the adequacy of the refrigerant charge present in the system 10. Additionally, a memory reset device, for example a momentary switch, may be provided to clear all the subcooling values and related data from the data storage bins. At the discretion of the service technician, the memory reset device maybe activated to clear the microprocessor memory after the system has been serviced, the refrigerant charge adjusted as needed or when a system fault has occurred which renders the stored subcooling history unwanted. Clearing the microprocessor memory prevents old or unreliable subcooling values and other data from influencing future charge adequacy determinations after the system has been serviced.


To further ensure the accuracy of the refrigerant charge adequacy determinations, the microprocessor 40 uses liquid line temperature signal 21D as an indicator of the outdoor ambient air temperature. If the liquid line temperature drops below a preselected first low temperature threshold value, for example 70° F., the microprocessor 40 uses a wider threshold tolerances to determine satisfactory refrigerant charge. If the liquid line temperature drops below a second lower threshold value, for example 55° F., the received data is not stored or processed and the microprocessor 40 will not perform any subcooling calculations.


In addition to storing the calculated “instantaneous” subcooling values in association with the sensed liquid line temperature at a particular point of operation, the microprocessor 40 also includes a conventional control circuit for integrating the stored instantaneous values of degrees of subcooling over a selected period of time to provide an average amount of subcooling over that selected time period. The microprocessor 40, at block 308, calculates the average subcooling (ASC) value associated with that particular liquid line temperature (LLT) based upon all the instantaneous subcooling values stored within that respective bin.


In the method of the invention, the microprocessor uses both the instantaneous subcooling and the average subcooling values in determining the adequacy of the system's refrigerant charge at block 310, and otputs anindication of the system refrigerant charge status at block 320. To determine level of charge adequacy, the microprocessor 40 compares the calculated instantaneous subcooling (ISC) value to a first target value, TARI, and also compares the calculated average subcooling value to a second target value, TARA. For the refrigerant charge to be deemed adequate, the calculated instantaneous subcooling value must lie within a specified tolerance, TOLI, of the first target value, TARI, and the calculated average subcooling value must lie within a specified tolerance, TOLA, of the second target valve, TARA. In an embodiment of the method of the invention, TARI and TARA are the same value, and TOLI is greater than TOLA, that is the tolerance TOLI associated with the instantaneous subcooling value is relatively wider than the tolerance TOLA associated with the average subcooling value.


As discussed, the refrigerant charge in the system 10 is deemed adequate, i.e. correct, if, and only if, both the calculated instantaneous subcooling value and the calculated average subcooling value are within their respective tolerance of their respective target subcooling value. If the average subcooling value falls below the value of TARA−TOLA and/or the instantaneous subcooling valve falls below the value of TARI−TOLI, the refrigerant charge is deemed low, i.e. an undercharge condition exists. However, if the average subcooling value is above the value of TARA+TOLA and/or the instantaneous subcooling valve is above the value of TARI+TOLI, the refrigerant charge is deemed high, i.e. an overcharge condition exists.


In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 1, the microprocessor 40 communicates with a charge status indicator panel 60 having a series of indicators, such as lights 62, 64 and 66, one of which is associated with an undercharge or low charge condition, one of which is associated with an overcharge or high charge condition, and one of which is associated with an adequate or correct charge condition. Referring now to Table I and FIGS. 4-7, if the average subcooling value is greater than TARA−TOLA and also less than TARA+TOLA, and the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than TARI−TOLI and also less than TARI+TOLL, as in Condition IF, as depicted at block 310 in FIG. 4, at block 320, the microprocessor 40 will illuminate LED 64 indicating that the refrigerant charge is correct. The microprocessor 40 will, as depicted in FIG. 5, also illuminate LED 64 at block 320 to indicate a correct refrigerant charge under condition A when at block 310 the average subcooling value is greater than TARA−TOLA and also less than TARA+TOLA, but the instantaneous subcooling value is unstable, and under condition J when no average subcooling value is available because the date storage bin for the current liquid line temperature is not full, but the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than TARI−TOLI and also less than TARI+TOLI.


Referring now to FIG. 6, at block 310, if the average subcooling value is less than TARA−TOLA, irrespective of the value of the instantaneous cooling, as in conditions B and D, or the instantaneous subcooling value is less than TARI−TOLI, irrespective of the value of the average subcooling, as in conditions E and I, the microprocessor 40 will, at block 320, illuminate LED 62 indicating that the refrigerant charge is low. Conversely, referring now to FIG. 7, if at block 310 the average subcooling value is greater than TARA+TOLA, as in conditions C and H, or if the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than TARI+TOLI, as in conditions G, H and K, the microprocessor 40 will, at block 320, illuminate LED 66 indicating that the refrigerant charge is high. Additionally, the microprocessor 40 will flash both LEDs 62 and 66 in the event, as in condition L, that the ambient temperature drops below a prespecified temperature, such as for example 55° F.


In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 2, the microprocessor 40 communicates with a single alert light, such as LED 72, to indicate that the system refrigerant charge should be checked. In an embodiment, the light 72 may be mounted on a service panel of the air conditioning unit. In an embodiment, the light 72 may be mounted on a thermostat within a residence or commercial establishment to alert the owner that a service technician should be called to check the service charge. The microprocessor illuminates the light 72 if, and only if, the microprocessor 40 determines the refrigerant charge to be either low or high, that is if an undercharge or overcharge condition exists.









TABLE I







Output of the processor - complicated:









Condition
Processor Evaluation*
LED Output





A
ISC Not Stable
Correct LED flashing



ASC > TARA − TOLA




ASC < TARA + TOLA



B
ISC Not Stable
Low LED flashing



ASC < TARA − TOLA



C
ISC Not Stable
High LED flashing



ASC > TARA + TOLA



D
ISC Stable
Low LED Illuminated



ASC < TARA − TOLA




ISC <=> TARI ± TOLI



E
ISC Stable
Low LED flashing



ASC > TARA − TOLA




ASC < TARA + TOLA




ISC < TARI − TOLI



F
ISC Stable
Correct LED



ASC > TARA − TOLA
Illuminated



ASC < TARA + TOLA




ISC > TARI − TOLI




ISC < TARI + TOLI



G
ISC Stable
High LED flashing



ASC > TARA − TOLA




ASC < TARA + TOLA




ISC > TARI + TOLI



H
ISC Stable
High LED Illuminated



ASC > TARA + TOLA




ISC > TARI + TOLI



I
ISC Stable
Low LED flashing



Current liquid line Data bin not full




ISC < TARI − TOLI



J
ISC Stable
Correct LED flashing



Current liquid line Data bin not full




ISC > TARI − TOLI




ISC < TARI + TOLI



K
ISC Stable
High LED flashing



Current or liquid line Data bin not full




ISC > TARI + TOLI



L
LLT < 55° F. (or other T)
Low and High LED




flashing in unison





*Logical statement within each block are treated as logic “and”






Referring now to Table H and FIGS. 8 and 9, if the average subcooling value is either less than TARA−TOLA, as depicted at block 310 of FIG. 8, and the a stable instantaneous subcooling value exists, irrespective of its value, as in condition D, or, as depicted at block 310 of FIG. 9, the average subcooling value is greater than TARA+TOLA and the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than TARI+TOLI, as in condition H, the microprocessor will, at block 320, illuminate the LED 72 to indicate that the system refrigerant charge should be checked. Under all other conditions presented in Table 11, the microprocessor will not cause the light 72 to be illuminated.









TABLE II







Output of the processor - simplistic (single “Check Charge” LED):









Condition
Processor Evaluation*
LED Output





A
ISC Not Stable
No Output



ASC > TARA − TOLA




ASC < TARA + TOLA



B
ISC Not Stable
No Output



ASC < TARA − TOLA



C
ISC Not Stable
No Output



ASC > TARA + TOLA



D
ISC Stable
Check Charge LED



ASC < TARA − TOLA
Illuminated



ISC <=> TARI ± TOLI



E
ISC Stable
No Output



ASC > TARA − TOLA




ASC < TARA + TOLA




ISC < TARA − TOLI



F
ISC Stable
No Output



ASC > TARA − TOLA




ASC < TARA + TOLA




ISC > TARI − TOLI




ISC < TARI + TOLI



G
ISC Stable
No Output



ASC > TARA − TOLA




ASC < TARA + TOLA




ISC > TARI + TOLI



H
ISC Stable
Check Charge LED



ASC > TARA + TOLA
Illuminated



ISC > TARI + TOLI



I
ISC Stable
No Output



Current liquid line Data bin not full




ISC < TARI − TOLI



J
ISC Stable
No Output



Current liquid line Data bin not full




ISC > TARI − TOLI




ISC < TARI + TOLI



K
ISC Stable
No Output



Current or liquid line Data bin not full




ISC > TARI + TOLI



L
LLT < 55° F. (or other T)
No Output





*Logical statement within each block are treated as logic “and”






For a number of reasons, including human error, it is very difficult to charge a newly installed air conditioning system with the proper level of refrigerant charge. Thus, when initially charging a system, the field service technician will charge the system upon installation with an amount of refrigerant that results in a value for the degrees of subcooling that falls within a tolerance of a target value for degrees of subcooling at the current operating conditions. In a system incorporating the present invention, the microprocessor 40 will monitor the refrigerant liquid line pressure, the refrigeration liquid line temperature and the outdoor ambient air temperature to calculated the actual subcooling and provide an indication of the refrigeration charge adequacy based upon an analysis of the calculated subcooling values relative to preselected target subcooling values for that particular system. To ensure an accurate determination of refrigeration charge adequacy, the method of the present invention filters data from the sensors to eliminate non-steady state operating conditions from consideration, bases the average subcooling calculations on the most current data available, and takes both the instantaneous subcooling value and the average subcooling value into account in determining the adequacy of the system refrigeration charge.


While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment as illustrated in the drawings, it will be understood by one skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be effected therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims. In particular, the present invention includes the equivalence of software and hardware in digital computing and the equivalence of digital and analog hardware in producing a particular output signal.

Claims
  • 1. A method for indicating the level of refrigerant charge in a refrigerant vapor compression system having a compressor, a condenser coil, an expansion device and an evaporator coil connected in serial relationship in refrigerant flow circuit, comprising the steps of sensing the pressure of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is near or above normally full charge in a liquid state only and generating a first signal indicative of the sensed refrigerant pressure;sensing the temperature of the refrigerant at the same location in the refrigerant flow circuit and generating a second signal indicative of the sensed refrigerant temperature;calculating in real-time an instantaneous value for the degrees of subcooling present based upon the sensed refrigerant pressure and the sensed refrigerant temperature;storing the calculated instantaneous value for the degrees of subcooling in a dedicated data location associated with the sensed refrigerant temperature;accumulating the calculated instantaneous value for the degrees of subcooling associated with each respective sensed refrigerant temperature within the respective data location associated with the respective sensed refrigerant temperature;calculating an average value for the degrees of subcooling present based upon the accumulated instantaneous values for the degrees of subcooling;determining a system refrigerant charge status based upon a consideration of both the instantaneous value for the degree of subcooling and the average value for the degree of subcooling;outputting an indication of the system refrigerant charge status.
  • 2. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of sensing the pressure of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is in a liquid state only comprises sensing the pressure of the refrigerant leaving the condenser coil.
  • 3. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of sensing the temperature of the refrigerant at a location in the refrigerant flow circuit whereat the refrigerant is in a liquid state only comprises sensing the temperature of the refrigerant at a location downstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the condenser coil and upstream with respect to refrigerant flow of the expansion device.
  • 4. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein the step of determining a system refrigerant charge status includes the steps of: determining whether the instantaneous subcooling value is within a first degrees of tolerance of a first target subcooling value; anddetermining whether the average subcooling value is within a second degrees of tolerance of a second target subcooling value.
  • 5. A method as set forth in claim 4 wherein the first degrees of tolerance exceeds the second degrees of tolerance.
  • 6. A method as set forth in claim 4 wherein the first subcooling target and the second subcooling target are the same degrees of subcooling.
  • 7. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein the step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status comprises indicating that the refrigerant charge should be checked.
  • 8. A method as set forth in claim 7 further comprising outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status indicating that the refrigerant charge should be checked if both the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than an instantaneous subcooling target value plus a first degrees of tolerance and the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value plus a second degrees of tolerance.
  • 9. A method as set forth in claim 7 further comprising outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status indicating that the refrigerant charge should be checked if the average subcooling value is less than the average subcooling target value minus the second degrees of tolerance.
  • 10. A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein the step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status comprises the step of outputting an indication of whether the refrigerant charge status is low, high or correct.
  • 11. A method as set forth in claim 10 wherein the step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status includes the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is correct if the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than an instantaneous subcooling target value minus a first degrees of tolerance and less than the instantaneous subcooling target value plus the first degrees of tolerance and the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value minus a second degrees of tolerance and less than the average subcooling target value plus the second degrees of tolerance.
  • 12. A method as set forth in claim 10 wherein the step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status includes the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is correct if the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value minus a second degrees of tolerance and less than the average subcooling target value plus a second degrees of tolerance and the instantaneous subcooling value is not stable or not available.
  • 13. A method as set forth in claim 10 wherein the step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status includes the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is low if the instantaneous subcooling value is less than an instantaneous subcooling target value minus a first degrees of subcooling or if the average subcooling value is less than an average subcooling target value minus a second degrees of tolerance.
  • 14. A method as set forth in claim 10 wherein the step of outputting an indication of refrigerant charge status includes the step of outputting an indication that the refrigerant charge status is high if the instantaneous subcooling value is greater than an instantaneous subcooling target value plus a first degrees of subcooling or if the average subcooling value is greater than an average subcooling target value plus a second degrees of tolerance.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US2006/048689 12/20/2006 WO 00 12/4/2009
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2008/079111 7/3/2008 WO A
US Referenced Citations (121)
Number Name Date Kind
2883255 Anderson Apr 1959 A
3321613 Searle May 1967 A
4114448 Merritt Sep 1978 A
4304126 Yelke Dec 1981 A
4325223 Cantley Apr 1982 A
4381549 Stamp, Jr. et al. Apr 1983 A
4429578 Darrel et al. Feb 1984 A
4510576 MacArthur et al. Apr 1985 A
4541284 Guagliumi et al. Sep 1985 A
4546616 Drucker Oct 1985 A
4561261 Kornrumpf et al. Dec 1985 A
4624112 Proctor Nov 1986 A
4677830 Sumikawa et al. Jul 1987 A
4745519 Breidegam May 1988 A
4798055 Murray et al. Jan 1989 A
4805416 Manz et al. Feb 1989 A
4829777 Matsuoka et al. May 1989 A
4841734 Torrence Jun 1989 A
4856288 Weber Aug 1989 A
4982576 Proctor et al. Jan 1991 A
5016472 Amrhein et al. May 1991 A
5046322 Bulla et al. Sep 1991 A
5057965 Wilson Oct 1991 A
5079930 Beaverson et al. Jan 1992 A
5156012 Kuribara et al. Oct 1992 A
5186012 Czachorski et al. Feb 1993 A
5206963 Wiens May 1993 A
5214918 Oguni et al. Jun 1993 A
5228304 Ryan Jul 1993 A
5239865 Salzer et al. Aug 1993 A
H1226 VanReenen et al. Sep 1993 H
5241833 Ohkoshi Sep 1993 A
5248168 Chichester et al. Sep 1993 A
5251453 Stanke et al. Oct 1993 A
5295360 Olds et al. Mar 1994 A
5317903 McClelland et al. Jun 1994 A
5341649 Nevitt et al. Aug 1994 A
5354103 Torrence et al. Oct 1994 A
5362530 Kitami et al. Nov 1994 A
5374084 Potokar Dec 1994 A
5381669 Bahel et al. Jan 1995 A
5406980 Allread et al. Apr 1995 A
5413147 Moreiras et al. May 1995 A
5423189 Nicol et al. Jun 1995 A
5425558 Dennany, Jr. Jun 1995 A
5430692 Grupp et al. Jul 1995 A
5463377 Kronberg Oct 1995 A
5464042 Haunhorst Nov 1995 A
5468028 Olson Nov 1995 A
5474336 Hoff et al. Dec 1995 A
5481884 Scoccia Jan 1996 A
5540463 Potokar Jul 1996 A
5560213 Wieszt Oct 1996 A
5586445 Bessler Dec 1996 A
5647222 Sarakinis Jul 1997 A
5694778 Wilson Dec 1997 A
5752726 Fixemer May 1998 A
5807332 Augustine et al. Sep 1998 A
5834943 Miller Nov 1998 A
5860286 Tulpule Jan 1999 A
5868437 Teague Feb 1999 A
5961157 Baron et al. Oct 1999 A
5987903 Bathla Nov 1999 A
6012743 Godeau et al. Jan 2000 A
6045742 McGrevy Apr 2000 A
6101820 Cheballah Aug 2000 A
6155612 Szabo Dec 2000 A
6161394 Alsenz Dec 2000 A
6179214 Key et al. Jan 2001 B1
6209338 Thatcher, Jr. Apr 2001 B1
6302654 Millet et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308523 Scaringe Oct 2001 B1
6324854 Jayanth Dec 2001 B1
6330802 Cummings et al. Dec 2001 B1
6354332 Burkhardt et al. Mar 2002 B1
6382678 Field et al. May 2002 B1
6442953 Trigiani et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460354 Yabuki et al. Oct 2002 B2
6463747 Temple Oct 2002 B1
6470695 Gong Oct 2002 B2
6481756 Field et al. Nov 2002 B1
6497435 Luft et al. Dec 2002 B1
6546823 Veit Apr 2003 B1
6550341 van Schoor et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553774 Ishio et al. Apr 2003 B1
6571566 Temple et al. Jun 2003 B1
6594554 Seem et al. Jul 2003 B1
6658373 Rossi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6708508 Demuth et al. Mar 2004 B2
6735964 Perkovich et al. May 2004 B2
6758051 Jayanth et al. Jul 2004 B2
6769258 Pierson Aug 2004 B2
6843070 Suharno Jan 2005 B1
6868678 Mei et al. Mar 2005 B2
6964173 Dobmeier et al. Nov 2005 B2
6981384 Dobmeier et al. Jan 2006 B2
7079967 Rossi et al. Jul 2006 B2
7146290 Triginai et al. Dec 2006 B2
7146819 Demuth et al. Dec 2006 B2
7386985 Concha et al. Jun 2008 B2
7752855 Matsuoka et al. Jul 2010 B2
20020024218 Manuli Feb 2002 A1
20020083723 Demuth et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020096209 Danielson et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020112490 Gong Aug 2002 A1
20020121100 Yabuki et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020139128 Suzuki et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020141877 Jayanth et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020182005 Milhas Dec 2002 A1
20030055603 Rossi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030089119 Pham et al. May 2003 A1
20030172665 Matsuoka et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182950 Mei et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030226367 Palmer et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040111239 Rossi et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040159114 Demuth et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050204756 Dobmeier et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050235755 Hindman Oct 2005 A1
20070125102 Concha et al. Jun 2007 A1
20080209926 Matsuoka et al. Sep 2008 A1
20100089076 Schuster et al. Apr 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (45)
Number Date Country
0159281 Oct 1985 EP
0289369 Nov 1988 EP
0308160 Mar 1989 EP
0396029 Nov 1990 EP
0409000 Jan 1991 EP
0453302 Oct 1991 EP
0529758 Mar 1993 EP
0550263 Jul 1993 EP
0760069 Mar 1997 EP
0843794 May 1998 EP
0918182 May 1999 EP
1238838 Sep 2002 EP
1337825 Aug 2003 EP
2667570 Apr 1992 FR
2274695 Aug 1994 GB
62218748 Sep 1987 JP
62261845 Nov 1987 JP
63302238 Dec 1988 JP
2110268 Apr 1990 JP
2195165 Aug 1990 JP
455671 Feb 1992 JP
4190062 Jul 1992 JP
4273941 Sep 1992 JP
599475 Apr 1993 JP
5231754 Sep 1993 JP
5256543 Oct 1993 JP
755299 Mar 1995 JP
868576 Mar 1996 JP
8261542 Oct 1996 JP
8261543 Oct 1996 JP
20009048 Jan 2000 JP
2000154954 Jun 2000 JP
200132884 Feb 2001 JP
2001141279 May 2001 JP
WO-9320376 Oct 1993 WO
WO-9530106 Nov 1995 WO
WO-9530107 Nov 1995 WO
WO-9533157 Dec 1995 WO
WO-9617202 Jun 1996 WO
WO-9712167 Apr 1997 WO
WO-9713994 Apr 1997 WO
WO-9713995 Apr 1997 WO
WO-9747908 Dec 1997 WO
WO-0045053 Aug 2000 WO
WO-0123794 Apr 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100088046 A1 Apr 2010 US