This application is based on German Patent Application No. 102006053274.0 filed on Nov. 6, 2006, of which the contents are hereby incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to a method for determining a quantity of a laundry load in a spin or tumble dryer, as well as a correspondingly constructed spin or tumble dryer operating according to this method.
There are numerous ways in which the load quantity of a spin dryer can be determined. From U.S. Pat. No. 6,505,369 B1 it is known how to determine an unbalanced condition during spinning and from this information determine the load quantity.
It is also known from EP 1 295 979 B1 how to measure the electrical resistance or conductance of the laundry contents in the spin dryer. From this, the laundry load quantity can be determined in conjunction with the elapsed time. However, as in the spin dryer the laundry quantity is constantly being shaken about, the measurements in this method are imprecise.
It is also known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,347,727 B1 to use both humidity or moisture sensors and also temperature sensors for measuring the laundry load. From the measured results thereof it is also possible to determine the load quantity, but the component costs are high.
An embodiment of the invention is described in greater detail hereinafter relative to the attached drawings, wherein:
A problem addressed by the invention is to provide an aforementioned method and a corresponding spin dryer making it possible to avoid the disadvantages of the prior art and in particular making it possible to determine the laundry load quantity in a spin dryer at limited cost.
This problem is solved in one embodiment by a method having the features of a corresponding spin or tumble dryer according to an example embodiment of the invention. Advantageous and preferred embodiments of the invention form the subject matter of the remaining claims and are explained in greater detail hereinafter. Some of the features are only described once. However, independently of this, they apply both to the method and to the correspondingly constructed spin dryer. By express reference, the wording of the claims is made into part of the content of the description.
The absolute atmospheric humidity is measured in the air outlet which leads away from the spin dryer loading chamber or drum. The invention can be used with particular advantages in the case of exhaust air spin dryers, which blow the moist air into the external environment, but it is not restricted thereto. According to one embodiment of the invention, the laundry load quantity in the loading chamber is determined in that the maximum value and/or the course over time, the absolute atmospheric humidity is determined in the air outlet or in the air removed from the spin dryer loading chamber. For this purpose, the measured values are continuously determined and as soon as they fall again following an initial rise, the maximum value is determined to have been just exceeded. For this purpose, it is normally only necessary to have one moisture sensor, which reduces component costs and also the installation duration.
Use is made of the fact that a correlation exists between the absolute atmospheric humidity and the water quantity present in the laundry or washing. In turn said water quantity, particularly with known residual moisture following the washing process, is dependent on the laundry load quantity and as a result conclusions can be drawn regarding the laundry load quantity from the absolute atmospheric humidity. In certain circumstances, the absolute atmospheric humidity can be influenced by the nature of the laundry load or the material. For this purpose, it is possible to obtain information from the nature of the chosen drying program and it can in particular be detected whether, for example, the load comprises cotton laundry to be dried. As will be explained in greater detail hereinafter, an attempt can also be made to more precisely establish this residual moisture.
In the method involving the determination of the maximum value of the absolute atmospheric humidity, the individual values are compared with one another and use is made of the highest or maximum value thereof. This determination of values can take place in a specific time window. It can alternatively be assumed that the maximum value has been determined, if for a given time after the hitherto highest value, for example a few minutes, no higher value has been determined.
Determination takes place somewhat differently if the course of the absolute atmospheric humidity is monitored over the course of time. Then, the measured values are compared relative to one another and not with respect to the absolute value thereof. If the preponderant number of successive measured values for the absolute atmospheric humidity in each case exceeds the preceding value, then the curve rises. If the preponderant number of measured values is below the preceding value, then the curve falls. If, in each case for this purpose, a time window of a few moments is chosen, it is also possible to draw conclusions concerning the maximum through observing the gradient over the course of the absolute atmospheric humidity.
The course of the absolute atmospheric humidity is normally such that after loading the moist laundry load and the start of operation, the curve rises sharply, after which it falls or flattens out and then reaches a rather shallow maximum and from there drops away in a relatively shallow manner. The moister the laundry load that is present in the loading chamber, the higher the maximum value of the absolute atmospheric humidity and the more shallow is its drop off over time. The differences in the maximum values as a function of the load quantity are so great that they permit a determination of the load quantity on the basis of the maximum value of different curves dependent on said load quantity.
The advantage of determining the washing load quantity present in the loading chamber is that automatic program sequences can be optimized or better adapted to the load quantity actually present. The essential reason for this is that the degree of moisture of the laundry following a washing process is normally within a relatively narrow range, i.e., is roughly always the same, particularly a residual moisture of approximately 50 to 70%, i.e., measuring the weight of water contained relative to the weight of the washing. If the load quantity is known, then the entire moisture in the loading chamber can be determined and a program sequence matched thereto, particularly with respect to duration, intensity of heating, etc.
It is advantageously possible that values are stored for a correlation of maximum values of the absolute atmospheric humidity with a specific load quantity. This means that with a given assumed residual moisture of the laundry load, a link is stored between the maximum value of the absolute atmospheric humidity and the given load quantity, particularly for a specific spin dryer type. By performing a comparison in a spin dryer controller, using the maximum value of the absolute atmospheric humidity determined by measurement, it is possible to establish the quantity of the laundry load present in the loading chamber.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the laundry load quantity in the loading chamber is determined by establishing a value of the absolute atmospheric humidity in the loading chamber air outlet at a specifically defined time following the start of spin dryer operation. Advantageously, values for the absolute atmospheric humidity at a specific instant are stored in correlation with a specific washing load quantity in the spin dryer. In the spin dryer controller, it is again possible to carry out a comparison of the measured, absolute atmospheric humidity at a specific instant and values stored therewith. From this it is once again possible to establish the load quantity in the loading chamber. As for the aforementioned possibility of comparing maximum values of the absolute atmospheric humidity with a load quantity in the loading chamber, for this purpose, the values can be experimentally determined for a specific spin dryer type and then stored in a controller.
The aforementioned, specific instant can advantageously be between 5 and 40 minutes following the start of operation. Advantageously, account is taken of the fact that in the first 5 minutes the absolute atmospheric humidity value still rises so steeply that said behaviour is essentially independent of the load quantity. Only after a longer time period is there a change to the paths or curves as a function of the load quantity. Advantageously, the specific instant is at approximately 15 to 20 minutes. In many cases, this instant occurs after reaching the maximum value when the path is already falling again.
According to a further embodiment of the invention for determining the load quantity, use is made of the point in time at which the absolute atmospheric humidity gradient, i.e., the gradient of its path curve, assumes a specific value. Here again, advantageously values are stored for a correlation of different values of the gradient at specific instants with a specific load quantity dependent thereon. A spin dryer controller again makes the comparison between the measured, recorded gradient of the absolute atmospheric humidity and the time instant. As previously stated, this once again makes it possible to determine the moist washing load quantity in the loading chamber.
One particular advantage for the aforementioned development of the method is that use is made of the instant at which the absolute atmospheric humidity gradient is already negative again, i.e., after reaching the maximum value. The advantage of this method is that there is a wait over a longer time, for example 20 to 30 minutes. In this time range the aforementioned courses for measuring the absolute atmospheric humidity as a function of time differ from one another according to the load quantity, allowing a distinction of the load quantity possible. It is also possible to make use of the instant at which the absolute atmospheric humidity gradient has become zero. It can be an instant of time at which the gradient, starting therefrom, becomes lower, or drops away, and is negative.
Advantageously, the time duration of a plateau-like path of the absolute atmospheric humidity is established and from this the determination takes place of the residual humidity of the load following the washing process and before the drying process. The longer the plateau phase time period, the higher the residual humidity can be assumed. If this residual humidity is known, it is even more precisely possible to determine with it the probable end of the drying process. The plateau phase can be defined in such a way that during it a variation of the absolute atmospheric humidity of max 10% below the maximum value is allowed. However, the path of the absolute atmospheric humidity is relatively shallow.
In the aforementioned spin or tumble dryer constructed for implementing the above-described method, a moisture sensor of a generally known type is located in the air outlet from the loading chamber from which can be gathered from the aforementioned prior art and is connected to the spin dryer controller. The latter is constructed not only for determining the measured values of the moisture sensor, but can also record the measured values or their trend. The aforementioned values are stored for the indicated correlations in a memory of said controller. The controller advantageously also has a time determination for the time which has elapsed since the start of operation.
These and further features can be gathered from the claims, description and drawings and the individual features, both singly and in the form of subcombinations, can be implemented in an embodiment of the invention and in other fields and can represent advantageous, independently protectable constructions for which protection is claimed here. The subdivision of the application into individual sections and the subheadings in no way restricts the general validity of the statements made thereunder.
For the determination of the atmospheric humidity of the exhaust air a moisture or humidity sensor 22 is placed in air outlet 20. Such a moisture sensor 22 is known to the expert and need not be explained here. Moisture sensor 22 is connected to a controller 24, as is fan 17 and heater 18. Controller 24 has a memory 25, possibly incorporated in an integrated manner, in which the different values can be stored and further reference will be made thereto hereinafter.
In addition to its use for an exhaust air spin dryer 11 as shown in
It is possible to see how initially all three curves are very similar. Only after about 2 minutes does the third curve 3 for the smallest washing quantity start to deviate from the other curves and then after about 500 seconds, or somewhat over 8 minutes operation, is a maximum humidity reached. From this maximum, the curve falls again with a roughly constant gradient.
This means that at the start of the drying process and independent of the laundry load quantity, the atmospheric humidity in the air outlet 20 determined by moisture sensor 22 is the same. This is due to the fact that during the starting up of the spin dryer 11, the maximum removable moisture from the washing 14 is roughly the same in each case.
The second curve 2 for a 3 kg load is the same as the first curve over a relatively long time period but then significantly flattens out after about 10 minutes (about 600 seconds), following which it assumes a not completely distinct maximum value and then after about 16 minutes (about 960 seconds), it again falls increasingly steeply.
The first curve 1 for a 5 kg load flattens out somewhat later than the second curve, namely after about 12 to 14 minutes (720-840 seconds) and reaches a maximum value at somewhat over 30 minutes (1800 seconds). At somewhat over 40 minutes (2400 seconds), the curve slowly and then more steeply falls again.
It is clear from the three curves that the atmospheric humidity as a function of time in
For the second curve 2 with 3 kg of washing is shown in dotted line form how the path would be if the residual moisture was 70% as for the 5 kg curve. However, this dotted line curve is only schematic. It is intended to illustrate how in place of the roughly detectable curve maximum there is a wider, plateau-like path, as compared to the curve for 5 kg. The situation would be similar for the curve with 1.5 kg.
Although providing information on the residual moisture of the washing following the washing process, it is to be assumed that the width or time duration of the plateau must be considered in comparison with the washing quantity. Thus, such a plateau phase for the 1.5 kg washing curve is shorter than for 5 kg of washing. If for example, in the case of curve 2 the residual moisture would be even higher than that of the dotted representation corresponding to 70%, the plateau phase would be even more extensive or longer.
To this extent according to a second previously described possibility, use can be made of the absolute atmospheric humidity value following a given time. In
According to another possibility, a gradient of the curve can be determined, particularly at a later instant or after exceeding the given maximum value. For this case, either a fixed instant can be provided, for example at roughly 16 minutes (960 seconds), in order to determine a curve similar to that of curve 3. This is drawn in through lines corresponding to the value for the gradient. It is also possible, for example, to continuously determine the gradient for determining the reaching of the maximum value. As soon as the gradient has become consistently negative, either the exceeding of the maximum is detected, or a then determination of the gradient is linked with the time of said determination and this is in turn compared with corresponding stored values.
According to another embodiment of the invention, by observing the present values for the absolute atmospheric humidity, it is possible to await the exceeding of the maximum. A specific point in time thereafter, for example somewhat less than 10 minutes (600 seconds) thereafter, is used in order to then measure the gradient of the path or curve. This also provides certainty that there is a readily determinable and comparable value for the gradient.
According to yet another embodiment of the invention, it is once again possible to continuously determine the gradient. It is then possible to establish the time at which the gradient assumes a specific value. Also, as a result of this characteristic as to the particular instant at which one of the curves of
As soon as the laundry load quantity 14 is known and optionally the further aforementioned values, the controller 24 can base thereon the sequence of the drying process with respect to time, air supply and possibly air temperature. Thus, an optimized drying process regarding result and energy costs can be implemented. It is possible for certain of the determined values, particularly the washing quantity, and in certain circumstances the residual moisture of the washing in loading chamber 12, to be displayed on a display on the spin dryer 11 as user information.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 053 274 | Nov 2006 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3016623 | Hamilton et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3110005 | Kripke | Nov 1963 | A |
3116982 | McIlvaine | Jan 1964 | A |
3122426 | Horecky | Feb 1964 | A |
3216126 | Brucken et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3221417 | Mellinger | Dec 1965 | A |
3253347 | Kripke | May 1966 | A |
3417480 | Thunander | Dec 1968 | A |
3613253 | Smith | Oct 1971 | A |
3651579 | Smith | Mar 1972 | A |
3660909 | Willcox | May 1972 | A |
3707773 | Wolfberg et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3733712 | Smith | May 1973 | A |
3762064 | Offutt | Oct 1973 | A |
3769716 | Janke et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3840340 | McKnight | Oct 1974 | A |
4015366 | Hall, III | Apr 1977 | A |
4170251 | Hine, II | Oct 1979 | A |
4221058 | Zagorzycki | Sep 1980 | A |
RE31023 | Hall, III | Sep 1982 | E |
4413427 | Villalobos et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4525937 | Strandberg et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4546442 | Tinker | Oct 1985 | A |
4718020 | Duich et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4733479 | Kaji et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4795871 | Strattan et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4862599 | Brunner | Sep 1989 | A |
5042171 | Obata et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5050313 | Wakaeya et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5187879 | Holst | Feb 1993 | A |
5315765 | Holst et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321897 | Holst et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5347727 | Kim | Sep 1994 | A |
5444637 | Smesny et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5651192 | Horwitz | Jul 1997 | A |
5755041 | Horwitz | May 1998 | A |
6112131 | Ghorashi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122840 | Chbat et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6199300 | Heater et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6249988 | Duske et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6446357 | Woerdehoff et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6505369 | Weinmann | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6845290 | Wunderlin et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6868621 | Grimm et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7013578 | Wunderlin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027887 | Gaylo et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7055262 | Goldberg et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7280892 | Bavel | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7478486 | Wunderlin et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7665225 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20020000049 | Woerdehoff et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040200093 | Wunderlin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050066538 | Goldberg et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050251289 | Bonney et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060179676 | Goldberg et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191161 | Wunderlin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060218812 | Brown | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016328 | Ziegler et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070144027 | Renaud | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080104860 | Muenzner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140255 | Ziegler et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155768 | Ziegler et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090255142 | Brown | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100000112 | Carow et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100152880 | Boyden et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168900 | Boyden et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100257833 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110015784 | Freeman et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110041260 | Balinski et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110041562 | Balinski et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110083338 | Carow et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099834 | Brown | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 295 979 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1790769 | May 2007 | EP |
55072749 | May 1980 | JP |
56000648 | Jan 1981 | JP |
56014147 | Feb 1981 | JP |
56096235 | Aug 1981 | JP |
56111448 | Sep 1981 | JP |
57153721 | Sep 1982 | JP |
58082479 | May 1983 | JP |
58153031 | Sep 1983 | JP |
59095327 | Jun 1984 | JP |
62060934 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62291531 | Dec 1987 | JP |
01076681 | Mar 1989 | JP |
01077445 | Mar 1989 | JP |
02134579 | May 1990 | JP |
02147099 | Jun 1990 | JP |
02229554 | Sep 1990 | JP |
02257998 | Oct 1990 | JP |
03148545 | Jun 1991 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080104860 A1 | May 2008 | US |