The present invention relates to a method and to a device for determining the tire diameters of a motor vehicle by comparing at least two opposite wheels.
Such a method is described in German Patent No. DE 3738914 A1. It describes a method for correcting the wheel speeds of a vehicle, which are determined by wheel sensors but differ from each other due to different wheel diameters.
In general, a datum regarding the tire diameter of the reference wheel(s) is required in order to determine the vehicle speed and/or the traveled distance. This information is stored in at least one control device and set into relation with the measured wheel rotation and the rotational wheel speed derived therefrom. In today's motor vehicles this information is stored on a vehicle bus, e.g., a CAN bus, in the form of numerical values. The functions connected thereto, such as, for example, the parking-space measurement (PSM) and the semi-autonomous parking assistant (PA), utilize this information to calculate the vehicle position at any given time on the basis of this data. An error in the information pertaining to the tire diameter will cause an error in the determined position. This may result in accidents, for instance when a steering control takes place on the basis of faulty positional data.
The tire diameter must therefore be calibrated. Generally, the calibration is implemented in such a way that either the tire diameter or the tire circumference is measured directly. As an alternative, a reference route is driven and the wheel rotations required for this purpose are set into relation with the driven distance. The disadvantage of such direct measurement methods is that a precise length measurement, such as the tire diameter, the tire circumference or the reference route must have taken place. This requires additional measuring components and a correspondingly high precision in the implementation of the length measurement.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for determining the tire diameter that requires minimal measuring effort but simultaneously offers the highest possible accuracy.
This object may be achieved by a method for determining the tire diameters of a motor vehicle by comparing at least two opposite wheels, in which a driving maneuver including at least one cornering operation is defined as calibration drive, and the change in the vehicle orientation in the calibration drive is determined.
One advantage of the present invention is that additional measuring components are dispensed with. It is therefore possible to calibrate the tire diameters on a public road at any time while driving and also on private property. The driving maneuver required for the calibration drive is compatible with the road traffic regulations and does not impede road traffic. Furthermore, the calibration may be carried out at any point in time and be repeated whenever and as often as desired.
The object is also achieved by a control system for determining the tire diameters of a motor vehicle by comparing at least two opposite wheels, sensors being installed to determine the change in the vehicle orientation in a calibration drive.
The measuring data of all four wheels of the vehicle are preferably set into relation with each other. During cornering, all four wheels exhibit different rotational wheel speeds, which are individually evaluable.
The calibration may be implemented by comparing the measured data of the calibration drive to expected values. In the process, the measured data of each wheel are set into relation with the measured data of the other wheels. The comparison with the expected values results in a correction factor for each wheel, which is set into relation with the correction factors of the other wheels.
For practical purposes, the rotational wheel speed and/or the steering angle and/or the steering-wheel angle are/is ascertained. Sensors are provided on the vehicle for that purpose. On the one hand, the measured values determined with the aid of the sensors are utilized as measured data, but it may also be used to determine the expected values on the other hand. The more measured values are available for evaluation, the more precise the calculation of the expected values for the wheel calibration.
This information obtained from the change in the vehicle orientation may be stored in at least one control device or is set into relation with the measured wheel rotation and the rotational wheel speed derived therefrom. In current motor vehicles the information is stored as numerical values on a vehicle CAN bus.
For the calibration it may already suffice to determine the expected values from a small number of measured data of the calibration drive. Data of the rotational wheel speed and/or the steering angle and/or the steering-wheel angle are utilizable for this purpose.
As an alternative or in addition, the expected values may be determined from the route information. The individual mutual angle of the roads traveled for the calibration drive, for instance, will be sufficient as route information.
As an alternative or in addition, the expected values may be determined from global positioning information, i.e., with the aid of satellite navigation.
For immediate calibration, the comparison of the expected values to measured data of the calibration drive may already be carried out during the calibration drive. As an alternative or in addition, the comparison of the expected values to measured data of the calibration drive may also be implemented following the calibration drive. For example, two calibration drives may be superposed in one driving maneuver.
A preferred driving maneuver for the calibration drive includes a reversal in driving direction, in particular what is generally known as a U-turn. It is conducted as a defined cornering operation, the drive away from the starting point and the drive in the direction of the starting point generally taking place in parallel in a finite range. The starting point and the end point are not identical in this case. A driving maneuver of this type is, for instance, a drive down a road, subsequent turning on the road, and a return drive on the road.
Alternatively, the calibration drive may encompass a closed route. Preferably, the starting point in this case may generally correspond to the end point. However, this need not necessarily be so. The deviation between the starting point and the end point should be small in comparison with the distance covered in the calibration drive. For example, the same parking spot is defined as starting/end point.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention is explained in greater detail below, with reference to the accompanying figures.
In a first exemplary embodiment according to
Using the measured data from the wheel tachometer and the steering angle meter or steering-wheel angle meter and proceeding on the assumption of the initially incorrect tire diameters, the vehicle position and driving direction are determined in a continuous manner by approximation. The calibration function determines that, following a likely turning maneuver in method step 130, a return along the same roads will take place again. It determines a section where, on the way back in method step 140, the motor vehicle must have traveled parallel to the drive out according to method step 110. With the aid of the angular deviation between the estimated driving direction and proceeding on the assumption that the parallel ride must have taken place in a 180° opposite direction, the error in the tire diameters is calculated directly. The correlation between angular deviation and error in the tire diameters is linear.
In a second exemplary embodiment according to
Using the measured data from the wheel tachometer and the steering-angle meter or steering-wheel angle meter and proceeding on the assumption of the initially incorrect tire diameters, the vehicle position and driving direction are continuously determined by approximation. Following the standstill in the parking spot at the very latest, the final vehicle angle is compared to the starting vehicle angle. Using the angular deviations between the estimated driving direction and the assumption that an approximately 0° change in orientation should exist at standstill in the parking space, a direct calculation of the error in the wheel diameter is carried out. The correlation between angular deviation and error in the tire diameters is linear.
In addition, the deviation of the estimated location at the end of the drive is compared in method step 270 with the location at the start of the calibration drive in method step 210, and the assumed tire diameter is adapted in such a way that the error becomes minimal.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 054 141.0 | Nov 2005 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2006/066501 | 9/19/2006 | WO | 00 | 10/14/2008 |