This invention relates to erosion control and more particularly to controlling the quality of water at construction sites near streams.
The specification and drawings of U.S. Pat. No. 7,449,105 which issued Nov. 11, 2008 and which is owned by the assignee of this application is incorporated herein by reference.
Construction projects that require installations across streams and other water resources are inherently problematic relative to issues of surface-water quality. Proper protocols must be followed for handling in-stream construction work to prevent suspended-solids release into the water body. This often involves the temporary isolation of the proposed crossing location by creating temporary dams immediately upstream and downstream of the construction crossing. These temporary isolation dams are typically constructed out of sand bags to create a relatively “clean” temporary barrier for flow. Once these barriers are in place, pumps or diversion channels can be installed to divert stream flow around the construction crossing location. When this bypass is in place, the construction at the crossing can take place. However, construction will usually create a suspended-solids slurry that must be evacuated from the crossing location in order to provide a dry, stable foundation for construction. The slurry is pumped out of the crossing pit and discharged away from the crossing location. This slurry can be a highly concentrated suspended-solids solution that will require treatment before it is discharged back into the stream. Conventional treatment approaches include using bags as filters. These bags may be constructed of porous material such as burlap or woven plastic material and are designed to be filled with a ballast such as sand, gravel, or wood chips so that the bags, when in place, may be filled further with the slurry/water mixture so that it slowly “bleeds” out or flows through the porous material, resulting in some degree of filtration and collection of solids onto the bag surface. These bags often clog very easily and are marginally successful in solids reduction with little removal of fine, colloidal solids associated with many clay soils. Accordingly, one of the objects of this invention is to provide a method and flow control system that improves the quality of water discharged into streams at construction sites by reducing the quantity of solids in the water. This is a dewatering process where high purity water is removed from the solids in a slurry.
The objects of the present invention are achieved by the following described system. The system incorporates a synergistic approach utilizing two products: the first being a highly durable, reusable sediment-retention sieve type filter bag manufactured with an external woven monofilament geotextile (with UV-inhibiting carbon black) of the type described in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 7,449,005 and sold under the brand name, EROSION EEL®, and which may be filled with a combination of washed, shredded rubber from recycled used tires and AASHTO-certified hardwood chips. The shredded rubber is a preferred filler that can be used alone or advantageously in combination with other approved fillers such as the aforementioned wood chips. The preferred filter bag has a nominal diameter of about 241 millimeters (9.5 inches) and a manufactured length from about 3 meters (10 ft.) to about 1.37 meters (4.5 ft.). This material combination has proven to be very effective in both laboratory and field applications. Like a silt fence, the filter bag can be applied to intercept sheet-flow runoff by installing the sieves perpendicular to the direction of flow along sloped surfaces. Unlike a silt fence, these special filter bags can also be placed within concentrated flow paths to act as a check dam. They can also be used to direct flow as a temporary diversion berm.
The second product is a new filter skirt material comprising of natural and synthetic fibrous matting impregnated with polymeric compounds that promotes flocculation of suspended soil particles to enhance settling rates and adsorption onto the surface area of the fiber matting and is sold under the brand name FlocMat™. The unique combination of the bag and skirt to form filter zones can result in removing substantially all solids from slurry passing therethrough.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention is a method for dewatering slurry from construction sites at temporary stream crossings comprising the steps of forming a channel, the walls of said channel comprising stacked filter bags as described above; lining the floor of the channel with the filter skirt material also described above; providing spaced apart baffles comprising filter bags across said channel disposed substantially perpendicular to the channel walls; placing a stack of filter bags at one end of the channel to diffuse the discharge of slurry that is pumped into said channel, and providing a closure dam at the other end of said channel to form a treatment zone before water filtered from said slurry is released.
In another aspect the invention is a treatment system that involves channeling the pump effluent at a construction site through a wide and long pre-fabricated channel. The sides of the pre-fabricated channel are formed using the filter bags filled with recycled (chopped or shredded) rubber and hardwood chip filter media. Shredded rubber, particularly, tends to remain in the ballast as discrete particulate and does not tend to form “clogs” as silt accumulates so that its effectiveness as a filtering medium is not significantly diminished over time.
The discharge from the pump hose is positioned to flow over a series of stacked filter bags in order to dissipate hydraulic energy and prevent soil scour at the hose outlet. From the pump discharge hose, flow moves as sheet flow via gravity through the pre-fabricated channel across a series of baffles consisting of stacked filter bags placed perpendicular to flow across the entire width of the channel, the positioning of the channel having been selected to promote gravity flow. The baffles are constructed by placing two filter bags side-by-side forming the base and placing a third filter bag on top. A series of one to five filter bag baffles may be used in a primary treatment zone. A secondary treatment zone (a settling zone) is provided below the primary pre-fabricated treatment channel. The settling zone is developed by installing a vertical-stacked filter bag baffle/check dam. Iron posts are positioned at the front and rear of the baffle/check dam to keep the vertical stack tightly in place. A layer of polymer-impregnated fiber, the filler skirt, is placed across the entire channel floor. The preferred polymer is polyacrylamide or PAM
In the drawings which are appended hereto and made a part of this disclosure by way of illustration and not limitation:
Looking at
The foregoing arrangement shown in
While one preferred embodiment has been described above, other embodiments may become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading and studying the foregoing disclosure. However, the invention is limited only by the claims that follow.
This application claims priority from Provisional Application Serial No. 61/011,075, filed Jan. 14, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3396545 | Lamberton | Aug 1968 | A |
3860526 | Corbett | Jan 1975 | A |
3985651 | Newman | Oct 1976 | A |
4631066 | Minemura et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4650368 | Bayer | Mar 1987 | A |
4889446 | Holmberg | Dec 1989 | A |
5015123 | Houck et al. | May 1991 | A |
5154543 | Houck et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158395 | Holmberg | Oct 1992 | A |
5338131 | Bestmann | Aug 1994 | A |
5429450 | Meidinger | Jul 1995 | A |
5505557 | Bradley | Apr 1996 | A |
5669732 | Truitt | Sep 1997 | A |
5678954 | Bestmann | Oct 1997 | A |
5815853 | Chase | Oct 1998 | A |
5902070 | Bradley | May 1999 | A |
5951202 | Brown | Sep 1999 | A |
5967965 | Vyshkina et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6109835 | Grabhorn | Aug 2000 | A |
6143047 | Jodoin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6206098 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6315493 | Malone et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6342456 | Jenkins et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6443652 | Houck et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464428 | Mikell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464862 | Bennett | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6547493 | Spangler et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6709202 | Spangler et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6733209 | Allard | May 2004 | B2 |
6749748 | Macpherson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6910835 | Spangler et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913423 | Spangler et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6988852 | Bussey et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7021869 | Sanguinetti | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7052206 | Mastromonaco | May 2006 | B1 |
7178224 | Bussey et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7226240 | Tyler | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7303670 | McPhillips | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7449105 | Hastings | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7559113 | DiCarlo et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
20040133176 | Muthiah et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060060512 | Astle et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090178979 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61011075 | Jan 2008 | US |