1. Field of the Invention
The present disclosure relates to a method for diesel particulate filter regeneration. More specifically, the method relates to diesel particulate filter regeneration in a vehicle equipped with a hybrid power train.
2. Prior Art
There is no known prior art related to this method for diesel particulate filter regeneration in a vehicle equipped with a hybrid power train.
Provided is a method for regeneration of a diesel particulate filter of a vehicle equipped with a hybrid power train, wherein the temperature of the exhaust exiting a diesel engine is increased above a predetermined level by increasing load on the diesel engine when regeneration occurs. Interaction between the diesel particulate filter aftertreatment system and the hybrid power train is controlled through messaging via a communication bus. The load on the diesel engine may be increased with or without the assistance of the electric motor of the hybrid power train and will not affect accelerator/deceleration of the vehicle.
Referring now to
The diesel particulate filter (DPF) undergoes regeneration in response to filter flow being reduced due to soot build up within the DPF. During normal operating conditions, a hybrid power train, in which load is allocated between a diesel engine and an electric motor/generator, may not always produce exhaust temperatures hot enough to accomplish regeneration of the DPF. The present method will request that the electric motor/generator act as a generator to increase load to the diesel engine during regeneration in order to rapidly increase exhaust temperatures required for regeneration, if the battery pack of the vehicle is below maximum charge, which will result in a decrease in time required to regenerate the diesel particulate filter. If, on the other hand, the charge on the battery pack is at maximum, the logic will shut down the electric motor/generator until regeneration is no longer necessary, and the load will be completely transferred to the diesel engine, again decreasing the time taken to regenerate the DPF. The method optimizes interactions between the DPF aftertreatment system and the hybrid power train control (ECM). If the battery pack is at a maximum and the after treatment system is equipped with a resistive element the heating element can be activated thereby heating the feedstream gas to the after treatment inlet and providing a uniform load on the engine. The affect will be to maintain maximum battery charge and reduce the duration of the regeneration event and associated emissions.
It will be understood that the regeneration is accomplished by getting the exhaust temperature hot enough, long enough to burn off the soot that has accumulated in the filter. The higher the load on the diesel engine, the hotter the exhaust and the faster the filter is cleared. The addition of an optional heating element can promote this action during initial heating phase.
It will further be understood that when the vehicle is equipped with such hybrid power train, and the electric motor/generator is assisting the diesel engine in motor mode, load is taken away from the diesel engine because the electric motor/generator thereof is “sharing” the load with the diesel engine.
It will be further understood that the method sends and receives information or data via a communication bus.
An overview and explanation of what occurs are found in the flowchart of
Step 1. The logic of the method starts.
Step 2. The logic first determines if the vehicle is equipped with a hybrid power train. If not, the logic moves on to Step 3. If so, the logic moves on to Step 4A.
Step 3. The logic ends. It will be understood that each time the logic ends within this scheme, the hybrid power train reverts to its hybrid operation, with the electric motor sharing the load with the diesel engine, as necessary.
Step 4A. The logic next checks to see if a regeneration of the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) is needed. The determination is based on sensing for a pressure drop across the DPF continually at Step 4B. It will be understood that, as the filter accumulates soot, the passages there through become plugged, producing a pressure drop, due to a restriction in through flow. When the sensed pressure drop becomes greater than a threshold, a flag is set at Step 4B indicating that regeneration of the DPF is required. If no flag is set, the logic moves on to Step 5. If the flag is set, the logic moves on to Step 6A.
Step 5. The logic ends.
Step 6A. Here the logic determines if the load factor on the diesel engine is below a critical threshold for DPF regeneration from a sensing of the instantaneous load factor at Step 6B. If not, the logic proceeds to Step 7. If so, it will be understood that the exhaust will not get hot enough to clean the DPF and the logic proceeds to Step 8A.
Step 7. The logic ends.
Step 8A. Once it is determined that the load factor on the diesel engine is below the critical level, the logic determines the state of charge on the battery pack that is connected to the electric motor/generator of the hybrid power train from sensing the state of battery charge at Step 8B. If the battery pack is at full charge, the electric motor/generator cannot be used as a generator because the battery pack will be damaged by overcharging thereof and the logic proceeds to Step 9. If the charge on the battery pack is below full charge, the logic proceeds to Step 10A.
Step 9. The logic causes the electric motor/generator to be disabled and the additional load previously shared by the electric motor is returned to the diesel engine to produce a load factor over the critical threshold, the vehicle reverting to a “non-hybrid”, diesel engine configuration while the regeneration of the DPF is occurring to ensure the load factor stays above the critical threshold for such regeneration. If the electric motor/generator is disabled, the logic intermittently moves on to Step 14.
Step 10A. If the battery pack is not at maximum charge, the electric motor/generator is utilized as a generator to charge the battery pack at Step 10C and to apply an additional load to the diesel engine by commanding the electric motor/generator on, which causes the electric motor/generator to absorb torque from the diesel engine, creating a “torque error” as sensed at Step 10B, and the logic moves on to Step 11A.
Step 11A. At this step, the logic computes the torque output of the diesel engine from an input of the DDT at Step 11B and an input of the torque absorbed by the electric motor/generator, acting as a generator, at Step 11C, by subtracting the absorbed torque input (negative torque) from the DDT input, to obtain a higher value, which higher value of diesel engine torque must be decreased to maintain the DDT at the required level. The logic then moves on to Step 11D.
Step 11D. Here the “extra” torque required as calculated at Step 11A, to maintain the Driver's Demand Torque (DDT) constant is output to the engine control module (ECM) The logic moves on to Step 12.
Step 12. The load on the diesel engine is increased by the amount the electric motor/generator is absorbing there from, as determined at Step 11D, to maintain the Driver's Demand Torque (DDT) constant and the logic moves on to Step 13.
Step 13A. If Drive/Power Train Torque (DTT) equals Driver's Demand Torque (DDT) (DTT=DDT) as determined from a sensing of DDT at Step 13B and DTT at Step 13C, then nothing need change and the logic circles back to Point 2. Alternatively, if DTT does not equal DDT, the logic circles back to Point 1, as the method needs to be stepped through again to determine what has changed.
Step 14. Here, as follows Step 9 described above, when the electric motor/generator has been disabled, the logic polls the PDF regeneration required input intermittently to see if regeneration is still required. If so, the logic returns to Point 1. If not, the logic moves on to Step 15. Step 15. The logic commands the electric motor/generator to turn back on and the logic moves on to Step 16.
Step 16. The logic ends.
As described above, the method of the present invention provides a number of advantages, some of which have been described above and others of which are inherent in the invention. Also, modifications may be proposed to the method without departing from the teachings herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is only to be limited as necessitated by the accompanying claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4809177 | Windle | Feb 1989 | A |
4926331 | Windle | May 1990 | A |
5017916 | Londt | May 1991 | A |
5018087 | Dannenberg | May 1991 | A |
5365436 | Schaller | Nov 1994 | A |
5566774 | Yoshida | Oct 1996 | A |
6016459 | Isaac | Jan 2000 | A |
6112138 | Dannenberg | Aug 2000 | A |
6188948 | Shivler | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6263269 | Dannenberg | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272402 | Kelwaski | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6313742 | Larson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6356822 | Diaz | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6401700 | Balekai | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6430485 | Hullinger | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431304 | Smythe | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6584391 | Lack | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6618665 | Walker | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6654678 | Rodriguez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6698409 | Kennedy | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724102 | Kelwaski | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725147 | Mollin | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6738701 | Wilson | May 2004 | B2 |
6801846 | Rodriguez | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6842676 | Rodriguez | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850832 | Rodriguez | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6907445 | Pellegrino | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6934619 | Read | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947822 | Martinez, Jr. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947832 | Rodriguez | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6973382 | Rodriguez | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985808 | Kennedy | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6988029 | Kennedy | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990951 | Liu | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6993428 | Gundrum | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7000393 | Wood | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013212 | de Ojeda | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7047953 | Kennedy | May 2006 | B2 |
7058502 | Rodgers | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7130736 | Bishop | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7184877 | de Ojeda | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7200485 | Kennedy | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7277791 | Petrosius | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289899 | Rodriguez | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292930 | Zhang | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7349798 | Beyene | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7433776 | Hunter | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7461627 | Liu | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7530220 | Miller | May 2009 | B2 |
7536992 | Wieshuber | May 2009 | B1 |
7584607 | Samuelsen et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7748214 | Ishii et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8001772 | Nishizawa et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8020372 | Mullins et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8042325 | Cicala et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20030145582 | Bunting et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040069281 | Corba | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040181325 | Rodriguez | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050075779 | Read | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114002 | Rodgers | May 2005 | A1 |
20050177301 | Bishop | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177302 | Rodriguez | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216174 | Rodriguez | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050288846 | Liu | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060005805 | Liu | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064229 | Kennedy | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060112679 | Kojima et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060185353 | Liu | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200297 | Liu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070084427 | Petrosius | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070129876 | Zhang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070204601 | Ishii et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080027618 | Liu | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080154478 | Lyons | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080184696 | Wyatt | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080276602 | McCabe et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319599 | Ptak | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100004812 | Merrick | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030452 | Rodriguez | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110197568 | Beaucaire et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110257821 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |