Method for drying lumber, method of impregnating lumber with chemicals, and drying apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8096064
  • Patent Number
    8,096,064
  • Date Filed
    Monday, December 17, 2007
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 17, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
A method for drying lumber in a short time with less use of energy. The method of drying lumber includes: enclosing lumber in a batch container having a pressure release valve; filling fluid into the batch container under pressure; maintaining a temperature and a pressure at or above a critical point of the fluid for a certain period of time; and then opening the pressure release valve of the batch container to reduce the internal pressure to atmospheric pressure.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The invention relates to a method for drying lumber by using supercritical fluid, a method for impregnating lumber with chemicals, and a drying apparatus.


2. Description of the Related Art


Pieces of lumber newly cut from trees (green lumber) contain a substantial amount of moisture. The amount of moisture depends on such factors as the type of trees and growth conditions, and often reaches or exceeds one half of green lumber by weight. Because of this, if green lumber is used as housing materials or the like without being dried, the lumber will shrink causing cracking or deformation due to gradual evaporation of moisture after the buildings are completed. In the worst case, this may even result in life-threatening dangerous buildings such as so-called defective home. To avoid such problems, it is necessary to dry lumber by an appropriate amount of moisture before use. Various lumber drying techniques have been used for this purpose.


Air drying, a classic technique for drying lumber, involves stacking pieces of lumber in a staggered fashion to allow water evaporation. This does not require active use of energy but the drying takes a long time, in the order of several months. For this reason, kiln driers are now typically used to complete drying in seven to nine days or so. For a further reduction in the drying period, superheated steam can be used with pressure control, so that humidity is lowered gradually to finish drying in three to four days. Reduced-pressure drying, involving lowering the boiling point by decompression for faster drying, and high-frequency drying for accelerated drying within the lumber as well as at the surface, are sometimes used in combination. A plurality of drying techniques may also be combined as appropriate for a reduced period of treatment and for a uniform finish, though with a considerable increase in cost due to factors such as the amount of energy used.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object of the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus for drying lumber in a short period of time with less energy.


To solve the foregoing problems, the inventors have made intensive studies and found that the foregoing problems can be solved utilizing the properties of supercritical fluid, and have thus achieved the present invention.


More specifically, the gist of the present invention pertains to the following.

    • (1) A method for drying lumber comprising the steps of: loading lumber and fluid into a batch container having a pressure release valve; maintaining a temperature and a pressure at or above a critical point of the fluid for a given period of time; and then opening the valve of the batch container to reduce the internal pressure to atmospheric pressure.
    • (2) The method for drying lumber according to (1), wherein the fluid is liquid or gaseous carbon dioxide or nitrogen.
    • (3) A method for impregnating lumber with chemicals, comprising the steps of: enclosing lumber in a batch container having a pressure release valve; filling the batch container with fluid under pressure; maintaining a temperature and a pressure at or above a critical point of the fluid; opening the pressure release valve of the batch container to reduce the internal pressure to atmospheric pressure; and impregnating the resulting treated lumber with liquid chemicals.
    • (4) The method for impregnating lumber with chemicals according to (3), wherein the fluid is liquid or gaseous carbon dioxide or nitrogen.
    • (5) An apparatus for drying lumber, comprising: a batch container for accommodating lumber; a pressure release valve provided on the batch container; a filling container containing fluid; a pressure pump for injecting the fluid from the filling container into the batch container under pressure; and a heater for heating the batch container.


The present invention has the following effects.

    • (1) Since lumber can be dried by treatment even at a low temperature in the order of 40° C., it is possible to significantly reduce energy consumption as compared to conventional heat-drying techniques.
    • (2) Even very quick treatment can reduce the moisture content by several tens of percent, only requiring a total of one hour or so for a single round of treatment. This method of the present invention can be employed to significantly shorten a drying process that would take at least several days by conventional techniques.
    • (3) Pieces of lumber dried by the method of the present invention greatly improve in water permeability. This enables wood preservatives and termiticides to be impregnated sufficiently and uniformly into the core of lumber following the drying treatment. It is accordingly possible to manufacture lumber with high durability.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an embodiment of a drying apparatus according to the present invention; and



FIG. 2 is a graph showing results of a water permeability evaluation experiment in embodiment 3.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Lumber to be treated by the present invention is not limited to any particular type of tree. Neither the moisture content of the lumber (the weight percent of moisture with respect to the dry weight of lumber) nor the sectional configuration thereof is limited in particular.


The batch container for use in the present invention is not limited to any particular type as long as it can accommodate the lumber to be dried and retain super critical fluid. Containers having a cylindrical shape are preferable, however, since they withstand the state of supercritical high pressure more easily. For material, stainless steels having high corrosion resistance, such as SUS 316, are desirable.


Among examples of supercritical fluid suitable for use with the method of the present invention are supercritical carbon dioxide and supercritical nitrogen. Supercritical carbon dioxide is expected to be particularly effective. The reason is unknown, but supercritical carbon dioxide seems to have a high solubility in water. Accordingly, since the operation of intense decompression is performed with a large amount of supercritical carbon dioxide in solution in the water within lumber, carbon dioxide will be gasified to powerfully drive moisture out of the lumber.


A description will now be given of the method for drying lumber according to the present invention.


The batch container, having lumber enclosed therein, is filled with gaseous or liquid fluid using a compression pump with a pressure at or above the critical point of the fluid. To reach temperatures at or above the critical point, the container may be preheated before the fluid is introduced under pressure. Otherwise, the pressure-filling with the fluid may be completed before heating the batch container. The critical point of the fluid is 31° C./7.4 MPa for carbon dioxide, and −147° C./3.4 MPa for nitrogen.


The temperature and pressure conditions are not limited to particular values so long as the critical point is reached or exceeded.


The temperature range is from 40° C. to 120° C., preferably 40° C. to 90° C., and yet more preferably 40° C. to 80° C. The pressure range is from 10 to 30 MPa, preferably 10 to 25 MPa, and yet more preferably 10 to 20 MPa.


The temperature and pressure are maintained at or above the critical point of the fluid for a given period of time. This causes the supercritical fluid to permeate into the center of the lumber such that the supercritical fluid is dissolved into a large amount of the water contained in the lumber. The maintaining period is from 5 to 60 minutes, preferably 10 to 40 minutes, and yet more preferably 20 to 40 minutes.


After the given period of maintaining the temperature and pressure, the valve of the batch container is opened to reduce the internal pressure to atmospheric pressure. When the valve is opened, the supercritical fluid permeated into the lumber and the associated moisture are released from the lumber, thereby drying the lumber. The decompression rate depends on the size of the batch container. A container having a capacity of, for example, 2 liters is desirably decompressed to atmospheric pressure in about 30 to 90 seconds.


For example, in an experiment which has been made, a piece of green heartwood of Japanese cedar lumber having a size of 700 mm (L)×30 mm (R)×30 mm (T) was put into a batch container of approximately 2 liters in capacity, and was maintained with supercritical carbon dioxide at 70° C. to 80° C./10 MPa for 40 minutes before being decompressed to atmospheric pressure in approximately 60 seconds. The green lumber having an initial moisture content of 164.3% dropped to 95.3% immediately after the valve was opened. Even after the initial opening, the lumber continued ejecting moisture and carbon dioxide from the surface for about one to two hours at room temperatures under atmospheric pressure. The moisture content dropped to 81.0% in two hours, and 57.2% in 24 hours after the treatment.


As above, it became evident that the drying process which formerly took several days by conventional techniques such as kiln drying and superheated steam treatment can be shortened significantly with the use of supercritical fluid. Moreover, while the conventional techniques have required temperatures as high as 120° C. to 140° C. for drying, the supercritical fluid yields a sufficient drop in moisture content even with treatment at a low temperature of 40° C. to 45° C. This allows a significant reduction in energy use.


Possible embodiments of the method of the present invention include one in which the present invention is practiced once only, one in which the present invention is practiced several times in succession to lower the moisture content in a short period of time, and one in which the present invention is practiced in combination with or as pre-processing or post-processing for conventional drying techniques.


Pieces of lumber dried by the present invention greatly improve in permeability. Liquid chemicals such as wood preservatives and termiticides can thus be sufficiently impregnated into the core of the lumber as a chemical treatment following the drying treatment. The reason for the improved permeability is unknown, but it seems that the rapid decompression to atmospheric pressure removes not only water but also depositions such as wood extractives adhering to and deposited on water passages in lumber, thereby improving water permeability. Some pits in wood cell walls may also be damaged by the sharp drop in pressure, possibly contributing to the improved permeability.


Examples of wood preservatives with which to impregnate the lumber include cupric oxide, cupric hydroxide, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, and zinc naphthenate. Examples of termiticides include phoxim, imidacloprid, propetamphos, and permethrin. Other chemicals such as phenol resins, PEG, acid dyes, and direct dyes may be similarly impregnated into the lumber without any particular limitation.


For impregnating the lumber with liquid chemicals, ordinary techniques such as immersion and vacuum treatments may be used as well as vacuum/pressure treatment. The vacuum/pressure treatment includes several combination patterns, including the Bethell process (full cell process), Ruping process (empty cell process), Lowry process (semi-empty cell process), and a multi-vacuum/pressure process (oscillation process).



FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of the lumber drying apparatus according to the present invention.


The reference numeral 1 indicates a batch container for lumber to be enclosed in. This batch container 1 has a pressure release valve 2 for reducing the internal pressure to atmospheric pressure, and a back pressure valve 10 for adjusting the decompression rate. The batch container 1 also has a pressure gauge 4 and a thermometer 5 for measuring the pressure and temperature inside.


A filling container 9 contains liquid or gaseous fluid, and from this container the fluid is introduced into the batch container 1 under pressure via a valve 8, a compression pump 7, and a valve 6. The fluid introduced into the container under pressure is heated by a heater 3, and the resulting supercritical fluid permeates into the lumber. The super critical state is maintained for a given period of time before the valve 2 is opened to reduce the internal pressure of the container to atmospheric pressure.


[Embodiment 1]


Using the apparatus shown in FIG. 1, an experiment was conducted on drying lumber with supercritical carbon dioxide. A single piece of sample lumber was put into and enclosed in the batch container having a capacity of 2 liters. The sample lumber was a piece of green heartwood of Japanese cedar (100 mm (L)×30 mm (R)×30 mm (T)). Next, carbon dioxide was injected into the batch container by using the compression pump, and was heated and compressed to the temperatures and pressures shown in Table 1. After this state had been maintained for 40 minutes, the valve at the container bottom was opened to release carbon dioxide and reduce pressure to atmospheric pressure in 30 to 90 seconds.


After the treatment, the test piece was taken out and measured for weight immediately. The moisture content (MC) was determined by the following equation:









MC
=



W
-

W
d



W
d


×
100






(
%
)






[

Eq
.




1

]








(where Wd is the total dry weight of a piece, and W is the weight of the piece).


The test piece was left in atmosphere at room temperature and again measured for weight 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 24 hours after the treatment, determining the moisture contents. Table 1 shows the results.









TABLE 1







Lumber drying experiment with supercritical/gaseous/liquid carbon dioxide








Treatment condition
Moisture content (%)
















Temperature
Pressure
Decompression

Before
Immediately after
After 30
After
After
After


(° C.)
(Mpa)
time (sec)
State of CO2
treatment
treatment
minutes
1 hour
2 hours
24 hours



















40-45
10
80
Supercritical
151.6
114.9
93.9
91.3
88.7
54.1


70-80
10
60
Supercritical
164.3
95.3
85.7
83.4
81.0
57.2


70-80
17
80
Supercritical
209.0
131.1
119.3
117.0
112.3
84.0


70-80
25
90
Supercritical
139.2
80.0
71.5
69.4
67.3
46.1


70-80
1.5
30
Gaseous
171.2
163.5
153.3
153.3
150.7
120.0


24-25
10
80
Liquid
148.2
134.0
110.4
100.9
96.2
64.5









When carbon dioxide was in a supercritical fluid state during treatment, moisture contents of 139.2% to 209.0% before treatment fell to 80.0% to 131.1% immediately after treatment (within 5 minutes of the treatment). The average rate of decrease of the moisture content was approximately 37%. Even after the treatment, the pieces of lumber continued releasing moisture and carbon dioxide from their surfaces for about one to two hours while left at room temperatures under atmospheric pressure. The moisture contents dropped to between 67.3% and 112.3% in two hours, and between 46.1% and 84.0% in 24 hours after the treatment.


When carbon dioxide was in a gaseous state during treatment, on the other hand, the moisture content fell only slightly. When carbon dioxide was in a liquid state during treatment, the moisture content decreased to some extent due to heavy discharge of moisture from immediately after the treatment up to one hour after. As compared to the treatments in the supercritical state, however, the decrease in moisture was not so sharp.


From the foregoing, it was found that the use of supercritical carbon dioxide makes it possible to dry lumber in an extremely short time.


The supercritical carbon dioxide treatment was then repeated on an identical test piece three times in succession to check for changes in moisture content. All three treatments were under the same treatment conditions of 70° C. to 80° C. temperature, 10 MPa pressure, and 60 seconds decompression time. Table 2 shows the results.









TABLE 2







Changes in moisture content by consecutive treatments with supercritical carbon dioxide


Moisture content (%)















Immediately
Immediately
Immediately






Before
after first
after second
after third
After 30
After 1
After 2
After 24


treatment
treatment
treatment
treatment
minutes
hour
hours
hours





128.1
88.8
64.5
53.3
49.6
47.7
47.7
40.2









Performing the supercritical carbon dioxide treatment three times in succession lowered the moisture content from 128.1% to 53.3%, or approximately by half. Each single treatment required approximately one hour. That is, the short total treatment time of approximately three hours could reduce the moisture content significantly.


This confirmed that treatment with supercritical carbon dioxide can be repeated to dry lumber even within a short time period.


[Embodiment 2]


Next, a drying experiment was performed with supercritical nitrogen. The apparatus used was the same as that of FIG. 1 except that the batch container had a capacity of approximately 900 ml and the container contained nitrogen gas.


A test piece of heartwood of Japanese cedar (100 mm (L)×30 mm (R)×30 mm (T)) was put into and enclosed in the batch container. Nitrogen was then introduced into the container, and heated and compressed to the temperatures and pressures shown in Table 3. After this state was maintained for 20 minutes, the valve at the container bottom was opened to release nitrogen and reduce pressure to atmospheric pressure within 15 to 20 seconds.


After the processing, the test piece was taken out and measured for weight immediately, and the moisture content was determined. The test piece was left inside and again measured for weight 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after the treatment, determining the moisture contents. Table 3 shows the results.









TABLE 3







Lumber dry experiment with supercritical nitrogen








Treatment condition
Moisture content (%)
















Temperature
Pressure
Decompression
Before
Immediately
After 30
After 1
After 2
After 24
After 48


(° C.)
(Mpa)
time (sec)
treatment
after treatment
minutes
hour
hours
hours
hours



















28
12.2
15
231.5
217.7
207.4
203.1

139.0



50
13
15
217.3
206.4
201.1
198.5
194.7
142.2



90
16
20
207.8
158.9
149.8
147.2
144.0

63.9


110
16
20
257.5
187.6
173.7
170.3
166.4
105.2









Nitrogen has a critical point at −147° C. and 3.4 MPa. In this experiment, nitrogen was in a supercritical state throughout. At temperatures of 28° C. and 50° C., the treatment yielded only a slight decrease in moisture content. In contrast, at temperatures 90° C. and 110° C., the moisture content immediately after treatment fell to approximately three-fourths of that before the treatment, showing a significant drop in moisture content as with the treatment with supercritical carbon dioxide.


From the foregoing results, it became evident that supercritical nitrogen can be used to provide an effective drying treatment if at or above 90° C.


[Embodiment 3]


In order to evaluate the water permeability of lumber dried with supercritical carbon dioxide, the following experiment was conducted.


A test piece of green heartwood of Japanese cedar (100 mm (L)×15 mm (R)×15 mm (T)) was treated with supercritical carbon dioxide using the same method as in embodiment 1. The treatment conditions were 120° C. temperature and 17 MPa pressure, with a maintaining time of 20 minutes and a decompression time of 15 seconds. After the treatment, the test piece was left in atmosphere at room temperature to dry to an air-dry state. To evaluate the permeability of the dried piece, the longitudinal-tangential (LT) and the longitudinal-radial (LR) surfaces of the test piece were sealed with one-component RTV rubber, and then the radial-tangential (RT) surface of the test piece was soaked in pure water to a depth of about 5 mm. The test piece was fixed on a wire basket so that the longitudinal direction of wood was vertical in the water. The test piece was then measured for the rate of weight increase after 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours. For the sake of comparison, a sample piece of green lumber was air-dried and subjected to the same experiment. FIG. 2 shows the results.


Six test pieces dried with the supercritical carbon dioxide treatment showed rates of weight increase 2.5 to 4 times higher than that of the air-dried lumber. This made it clear that the drying treatment according to the method of the present invention significantly improves the water permeability of lumber.


Since the present invention can reduce the power consumption required in drying lumber and can dry lumber in a short time, it is suited for technologies for drying construction lumber etc. In addition, since the method of present invention dries lumber with an improvement in permeability and chemicals thus permeate into the lumber efficiently, it is suited to improving the durability of lumber.

Claims
  • 1. A method for drying lumber comprising the steps of: enclosing green lumber in a batch container having a pressure release valve;filling supercritical fluid into the batch container;maintaining the temperature in a range from 40° C. to 120° C. and pressure in a range from 10 to 30 MPa for a given period of time; andthen opening the pressure release valve of the batch container to reduce the internal pressure to atmospheric pressure.
  • 2. The method for drying lumber according to claim 1, wherein the supercritical fluid is supercritical carbon dioxide or supercritical nitrogen.
  • 3. The method for drying lumber according to claim 1, wherein the maintaining period is from 5 to 60 minutes.
  • 4. The method for drying lumber according to claim 1, wherein the decompression rate is from 30 to 90 seconds per 2 liters of supercritical fluid.
  • 5. The method for drying lumber according to claim 1, wherein the supercritical fluid treatment is performed from one to three times on the identical lumber.
  • 6. A method for improving the permeability of lumber, comprising the steps of: enclosing green lumber in a batch container having a pressure release valve;filling supercritical fluid into the batch container;maintaining the temperature in a range from 40° C. to 120° C. and pressure in a range from 10 to 30 MPa for a given period of time; andthen opening the pressure release valve of the batch container to reduce the internal pressure to atmospheric pressure.
  • 7. The method for improving the permeability of lumber according to claim 6, wherein the supercritical fluid is supercritical carbon dioxide or supercritical nitrogen.
  • 8. The method for improving the permeability of lumber according to claim 6, wherein the maintaining period is from 5 to 60 minutes.
  • 9. The method for improving the permeability of lumber according to claim 6, wherein the decompression rate is from 30 to 90 seconds per 2 liters of supercritical fluid.
  • 10. The method for improving the permeability of lumber according to claim 6, wherein the supercritical fluid treatment is performed from one to three times on the identical lumber.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2007-015813 Jan 2007 JP national
US Referenced Citations (257)
Number Name Date Kind
3685959 Dunn, Jr. et al. Aug 1972 A
3859934 Weholt Jan 1975 A
3900615 Dunn, Jr. Aug 1975 A
3986268 Koppelman Oct 1976 A
4009835 Syrjanen Mar 1977 A
4017421 Othmer Apr 1977 A
4072274 Syrjanen Feb 1978 A
4123221 Danford Oct 1978 A
4283252 Reinhall Aug 1981 A
4421595 Huusari Dec 1983 A
4457804 Reinhall Jul 1984 A
4493797 Avedesian Jan 1985 A
4543190 Modell Sep 1985 A
4671192 Hoffert et al. Jun 1987 A
4714591 Avedesian Dec 1987 A
4724780 Hoffert et al. Feb 1988 A
4850288 Hoffert et al. Jul 1989 A
4882107 Cavender et al. Nov 1989 A
4946965 Jahnke et al. Aug 1990 A
4992308 Sunol Feb 1991 A
5009367 Nielsen Apr 1991 A
5009745 Hossain et al. Apr 1991 A
5009746 Hossain et al. Apr 1991 A
5013366 Jackson et al. May 1991 A
5057342 Hoy et al. Oct 1991 A
5066522 Cole et al. Nov 1991 A
5074958 Blaney et al. Dec 1991 A
5106659 Hastings et al. Apr 1992 A
5108799 Hoy et al. Apr 1992 A
5120558 Nguyen et al. Jun 1992 A
5126058 Beckman Jun 1992 A
5141156 Hoy et al. Aug 1992 A
5169687 Sunol Dec 1992 A
5170727 Nielsen Dec 1992 A
5171613 Bok et al. Dec 1992 A
5178325 Nielsen Jan 1993 A
5203843 Hoy et al. Apr 1993 A
5211342 Hoy et al. May 1993 A
5213660 Hossain et al. May 1993 A
5232604 Swallow et al. Aug 1993 A
5288619 Brown et al. Feb 1994 A
5290602 Argyropoulos et al. Mar 1994 A
5340614 Perman et al. Aug 1994 A
5364475 Levien et al. Nov 1994 A
5374305 Glancy et al. Dec 1994 A
5419487 Nielsen et al. May 1995 A
5466490 Glancy et al. Nov 1995 A
5508060 Perman et al. Apr 1996 A
5509959 Nielsen et al. Apr 1996 A
5572880 Frustaci et al. Nov 1996 A
5689968 Frustaci et al. Nov 1997 A
5716558 Nielsen et al. Feb 1998 A
5747042 Choquet May 1998 A
5766522 Daly et al. Jun 1998 A
5803936 Huber Sep 1998 A
5942008 Curto Aug 1999 A
5975874 Daly et al. Nov 1999 A
6075074 Daly et al. Jun 2000 A
6095212 Izumi et al. Aug 2000 A
6106896 Nielsen et al. Aug 2000 A
6114414 Daly et al. Sep 2000 A
6124226 Nielsen et al. Sep 2000 A
6228897 Daly et al. May 2001 B1
6235403 Vinden et al. May 2001 B1
6267920 Arakawa et al. Jul 2001 B1
6286231 Bergman et al. Sep 2001 B1
6357142 Bergman et al. Mar 2002 B1
6426136 Rouse et al. Jul 2002 B1
6473994 Dedieu et al. Nov 2002 B1
6503396 Kim et al. Jan 2003 B2
6543156 Bergman et al. Apr 2003 B2
6575721 Daly et al. Jun 2003 B1
6583187 Ernst et al. Jun 2003 B1
6663954 Rouse et al. Dec 2003 B2
6675495 Dedieu et al. Jan 2004 B2
6709602 Spritzer et al. Mar 2004 B2
6932155 Vinegar et al. Aug 2005 B2
6969123 Vinegar et al. Nov 2005 B2
6991045 Vinegar et al. Jan 2006 B2
7011154 Maher et al. Mar 2006 B2
7051808 Vinegar et al. May 2006 B1
7063145 Veenstra et al. Jun 2006 B2
7066257 Wellington et al. Jun 2006 B2
7073578 Vinegar et al. Jul 2006 B2
7077198 Vinegar et al. Jul 2006 B2
7077199 Vinegar et al. Jul 2006 B2
7086465 Wellington et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090013 Wellington Aug 2006 B2
7100994 Vinegar et al. Sep 2006 B2
7114566 Vinegar et al. Oct 2006 B2
7121341 Vinegar et al. Oct 2006 B2
7121342 Vinegar et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128153 Vinegar et al. Oct 2006 B2
7140393 Sheydayi Nov 2006 B2
7156176 Vinegar et al. Jan 2007 B2
7165615 Vinegar et al. Jan 2007 B2
7179849 Terry Feb 2007 B2
7219734 Bai et al. May 2007 B2
7223828 Arjunan May 2007 B2
7291565 Hansen et al. Nov 2007 B2
7319125 Arjunan et al. Jan 2008 B2
7326756 Arjunan Feb 2008 B2
7339018 Arjunan Mar 2008 B2
7360588 Vinegar et al. Apr 2008 B2
7378156 Terry May 2008 B2
7389654 Wikstrom et al. Jun 2008 B2
7394182 Pelrine et al. Jul 2008 B2
7434590 Sheydayi Oct 2008 B2
7435447 Parent Oct 2008 B2
7461691 Vinegar et al. Dec 2008 B2
7491036 Parent et al. Feb 2009 B2
7524383 Parent et al. Apr 2009 B2
7547421 McSherry et al. Jun 2009 B2
7547539 Ikegami et al. Jun 2009 B2
7640980 Vinegar et al. Jan 2010 B2
7790787 Williams et al. Sep 2010 B2
7942203 Vinegar et al. May 2011 B2
20020000410 Kim et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020026729 Bergman et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020045347 Worm et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020095816 Bergman et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020173682 Tullio et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020179541 Spritzer et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030026975 Rouse et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037458 Dedieu et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030173072 Vinegar et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030173081 Vinegar et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030173085 Vinegar et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030178191 Maher et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030183390 Veenstra et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030192691 Vinegar et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030192693 Wellington Oct 2003 A1
20030196788 Vinegar et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030196789 Wellington et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030196801 Vinegar et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030196810 Vinegar et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030201098 Karanikas et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030205378 Wellington et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040020642 Vinegar et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040040715 Wellington et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040050406 Sehgal Mar 2004 A1
20040094144 Ikegami et al. May 2004 A1
20040110909 Arjunan Jun 2004 A1
20040110910 Arjunan Jun 2004 A1
20040110911 Arjunan Jun 2004 A1
20040116551 Terry Jun 2004 A1
20040122191 Arjunan et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040140095 Vinegar et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040140096 Sandberg et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040144540 Sandberg et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040144541 Picha et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145969 Bai et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040146288 Vinegar et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040177966 Vinegar et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040211569 Vinegar et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050000244 Wikstrom et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050006097 Sandberg et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050051327 Vinegar et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050084532 Howdle et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050092483 Vinegar et al. May 2005 A1
20050260311 Garwood Nov 2005 A1
20050279707 Matthews et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288204 Matts et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060065288 Babic et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060102208 Jacobson et al. May 2006 A1
20060134332 Babic Jun 2006 A1
20060144515 Tada et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060278254 Jackson Dec 2006 A1
20070012337 Hillman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070131411 Vinegar et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070164641 Pelrine et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070178051 Pruitt et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070209799 Vinegar et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070218298 Terry Sep 2007 A1
20070259169 Williams et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070259766 Jackson Nov 2007 A1
20080051476 Russell et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080095677 McSherry et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080153997 Casty et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080178490 Matsunaga et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080188635 Brant et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080199536 Terry Aug 2008 A1
20080199623 Terry Aug 2008 A1
20080209799 Woods et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080234443 Kiss et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080251454 Waibel et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080275132 McSherry et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281040 Kiss et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090000184 Garwood Jan 2009 A1
20090071647 Vinegar et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090076214 Kiss et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090076216 Kiss et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090163642 Kiss et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090163643 Kiss et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090183693 Furman Jul 2009 A1
20090205370 Costa et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090208365 Mcsherry et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090226586 Garwood Sep 2009 A1
20090288788 Castor Nov 2009 A1
20090293882 Terry Dec 2009 A1
20090305355 Henriksen et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100043782 Kilambi et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100069626 Kilambi Mar 2010 A1
20100111830 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111831 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111832 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111833 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111834 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111835 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111836 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111837 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111841 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111842 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111843 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111844 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111845 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111846 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111847 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111848 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111849 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111850 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111854 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111855 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111857 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100111938 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100112067 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100112068 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100112093 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100113614 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100113615 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100114013 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100114267 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100114268 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100114348 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100114496 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100114497 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100114545 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100114546 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100114547 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100114592 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100119557 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100121466 Boyden et al. May 2010 A1
20100126727 Vinegar et al. May 2010 A1
20100143243 Boyden et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100152326 Kurz Jun 2010 A1
20100152651 Boyden et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100152880 Boyden et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100163576 Boyden et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100168900 Boyden et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100181066 Vinegar et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100185174 Boyden et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100187728 Boyden et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100191003 Isobe et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100228067 Peterson et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100279044 Williams et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100280171 Williams et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110092726 Clarke Apr 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (69)
Number Date Country
3120927 Jun 1982 DE
3801518 Aug 1989 DE
4202320 Aug 1993 DE
19951627 Jul 2000 DE
2169869 Jul 1986 GB
57047640 Mar 1982 JP
60067107 Apr 1985 JP
60262888 Dec 1985 JP
63039309 Feb 1988 JP
01158911 Jun 1989 JP
02011302 Jan 1990 JP
02305602 Dec 1990 JP
03000204 Jan 1991 JP
03021401 Jan 1991 JP
03021402 Jan 1991 JP
03027902 Feb 1991 JP
03104601 May 1991 JP
04146101 May 1992 JP
04185302 Jul 1992 JP
04201504 Jul 1992 JP
04208402 Jul 1992 JP
05169406 Jul 1993 JP
06071617 Mar 1994 JP
06088095 Mar 1994 JP
06091611 Apr 1994 JP
06091614 Apr 1994 JP
07052106 Feb 1995 JP
08080513 Mar 1996 JP
08300313 Nov 1996 JP
08332646 Dec 1996 JP
10006309 Jan 1998 JP
10071609 Mar 1998 JP
10249812 Sep 1998 JP
10338767 Dec 1998 JP
11061142 Mar 1999 JP
11105007 Apr 1999 JP
11217401 Aug 1999 JP
11235563 Aug 1999 JP
11323757 Nov 1999 JP
2000070604 Mar 2000 JP
2000128663 May 2000 JP
2000143223 May 2000 JP
2000263621 Sep 2000 JP
2000326310 Nov 2000 JP
2001138307 May 2001 JP
2001327943 Nov 2001 JP
2002137204 May 2002 JP
2002233400 Aug 2002 JP
2002234002 Aug 2002 JP
2002263465 Sep 2002 JP
2002282405 Oct 2002 JP
2003049355 Feb 2003 JP
2003306393 Oct 2003 JP
2005053510 Mar 2005 JP
2006036977 Feb 2006 JP
2006082353 Mar 2006 JP
2006321068 Nov 2006 JP
2007192464 Aug 2007 JP
2007313476 Dec 2007 JP
2008105957 May 2008 JP
2008173925 Jul 2008 JP
2008194948 Aug 2008 JP
2008273915 Nov 2008 JP
2009190260 Aug 2009 JP
2010205712 Sep 2010 JP
WO 8701432 Mar 1987 WO
WO 9635560 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9639294 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9923429 May 1999 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080178490 A1 Jul 2008 US