Method for electrical doping a semiconductor material with Cesium

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7507649
  • Patent Number
    7,507,649
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 30, 2005
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 24, 2009
    17 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for doping a semiconductor material with Cesium, wherein said semiconductor material is exposed to a cesium vapor. Said Cesium vapor is provided by Cesium sublimation from a Cesium alloy. There is also provided an organic light emitting diode comprising at least one layer of a Cesium doped organic semiconductor material, wherein said at least one layer of said Cesium doped organic semiconductor material is doped with Cesium provided by Cesium evaporation of Cesium from a Cesium alloy. The Cesium vapor is preferably provided by Cesium sublimation from a standard organic material deposition evaporator.
Description
Cross-Reference to Related Application

Applicants hereby claim priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a) to European Patent Application No. 04023945.1, filed Oct. 7, 2004.


The invention relates to a method for electrical doping a semiconductor material with Cesium, and an organic light emitting diode (OLED) comprising at least one layer of a Cesium doped semiconductor material. Electrical doping a semiconductor material means the admixture of dopant molecules to the semiconductor materials to increase the conductivity of the semiconductor material by increasing the intrinsic charge carrier density on the semiconductor material.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Such doped semiconductor layers are for example used in organic light emitting diodes. Doping of electron transport layers (ETL) in organic light emitting diodes using alkali metals is an established technique to improve the power efficiency of such devices. Due to the unavailability of sufficiently strong molecular donors, alkali metals are used as donor atoms. Among the alkali metals, Cesium (Cs) is frequently used because it gives the highest stability of OLED with such doped ETL. Organic semiconductors are referred to as electron transport materials if whether their electron mobility is higher than their hole mobility, or their electron mobility is bigger than 1E-6 cm2/Vs (in the relevant field range of around 1-100E5V/cm). The ETL materials needs to be stable against reduction to support electron current over a long time. The energetic position of the lowest unoccupied molecular level (LUMO) is in the range from 2.4 eV to 3.8 eV, preferably 2.4 to 3 eV.


Currently, the only possibility to provide Cs vapor for doping purposes is the use of so called getter sources provided by S.A.E.S. getters. In these sources, Cs2CrO4 or Cs2MoO4 salts are decomposed by thermolysis and the released vapor guided through getter materials which removes the oxygen from the gas phase. After passing the getter, pure Cs vapor is released.


There are several drawbacks combined with this type of source. The sources need very high operating temperatures to carry out thermolysis. The container of the source achieves temperatures above 400° C. during operating, while the content is heated even more. This causes extra effort for cooling of the vacuum chamber. Due to strong gas adsorption at the getter material, severe degassing is observed during heat up, especially when the source was exposed to air beforehand. It takes a long time (ten min) until the Cs dispenser releases Cs vapor. Another ten minutes has to pass before the Cs evaporation rate is sufficiently stable. No rate is observed at quartz microbalances placed over the dispenser even when the former is water cooled. This is a major obstacle to process control. Checks for the proper operation of the source have to be carried out on a regular basis, which reduces the throughput of the vacuum chamber and adds to maintenance time and effort. Due to the complicated arrangement of the various components of such a source, it geometry flexibility is restricted, resulting in space demanding set-ups and limited evaporation characteristics. Finally, at least for Cs2CrO4, health and environmental risks are imminent due to the high toxicity of that compound.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a graph depicting a Cls signal in XPS, wherein the photoelectron count is plotted against Ekin (eV).



FIG. 2 is a graph depicting a Cs signal in XPS, wherein the photoelectron count is plotted against Ekin (eV).



FIG. 3 is a graph depicting an Ir signal in SPX, wherein the photoelectron count is plotted against Ekin (eV).


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is the object of the invention to provide a method for electrical doping a semiconductor material with Cesium, where electrical doping can be performed in a more simple fashion with improved process control.


According to one aspect of the invention a method for electrical doping a semiconductor material with Cesium is provided, wherein said semiconductor material is exposed to a Cesium vapor. Said Cesium vapor is provided by Cesium sublimation from a Cesium alloy.


According to another aspect of the invention an organic light emitting diode is provided, wherein said organic light emitting diode comprising at least one layer of a Cesium doped organic semiconductor material and said at least one layer of said Cesium doped organic semiconductor material being doped with Cesium provided by Cesium evaporation of Cesium from a Cesium alloy.


The invention provides the advantage that Cesium sublimation for electrical doping a semi-conductor material is easier to control, since controlling and measuring of the sublimation rate is improved. Overall controlling of the process of electrical doping is more reliable.


Advantageous developments of the invention are disclosed in dependent claims.





DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Following the invention will be described in further detail, by way of example, with reference to different embodiments.


A method for doping a semiconductor material with Cesium (Cs) is described, wherein said semiconductor material is exposed to a cesium vapor. Said Cesium vapor is provided by Cesium sublimation from a Cesium alloy. Preferably GaCs alloys offer a possibility to provide Cs vapor. Here, Cs is released from the surface of the alloy at moderate temperatures. Simultaneously, further Cs diffuses through the core to the surface. The evaporation proceeds with a constant sublimation rate for a given temperature until finally the Cs content is used up. Under appropriate conditions, a thin shell of pure Ga is produced covering the air-sensitive GaCs core. In that instance, the GaCs pieces can be handled in air at least for several tens of minutes without degradation, means a negative effect on the doping capability of the Cs vapor.


The cesium evaporation takes place already at moderate temperatures around 300° C. It is possible to measure a Cs rate on a water cooled quartz microbalance. The source operation is quick. Stable Cs rate are provided by temperature control. Standard evaporators for organic materials can be used to evaporate the GaCs alloy.


In an embodiment a Bathopbenanthroline (BPhen) layer shows an increase in conductivity, when it is exposed to vapor released by the GaCs alloy. BPhen is a well known electron transport material in the OLED field and can be easily doped with Cs.


In the course of the experiments, it was noted that the quartz microbalance (QMB1) usually used to monitor the evaporation of molecular compounds display a stable evaporation rate during the operation of the GaCs alloy evaporator. When the evaporation temperature is operated at a stable temperature, a constant rate is observed over time. This is in contrast to the observation for S.A.E.S. Cs dispensers, where no stable rates were observed.


Calibration of the evaporation was performed. For this purpose, a second quartz microbalance (QMB2) is placed at the position of the sample. By comparison of the rates measured by QMB2 with QMB1, the geometric tooling factor can be determined It was observed that QMB2 displayed a rate decreasing with time while the evaporator was operated at a stable temperature and QMB1 showed a stable rate. The reason for the differing behavior is most likely the fact that QMB 1 is water cooled, while the uncooled QMB2 may heat up during operation. This could reduce the sticking coefficient of the Cs atoms impinging on the quartz surface. Calibration of the source was than attempted using surface analysis of a Cs doped organic film using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).


In a further embodiment, two samples of Cs doped films were prepared by co-evaporation on Au substrates. As matrices, metal complexes have been employed. The XPS signal of the corresponding metal atoms gives further information on the stoichiometry of the film. Both films have a nominal doping concentration of 1.8:1 (ratio Cs to matrix material), as determined by the measured evaporation rates and assuming the tooling factor for the Cs evaporator to be similar to values found earlier for molecular dopants.


The films were transferred to the XPS analysis chamber through air. Consequently, a sputtering step has been carried out to remove over-layers of adsorbed gas. XPS spectra were recorded for Al Kα irradiation (1486.61eV). In FIG. 1 to 3 representative peaks XPS for a Cs:Ir(ppy)3 sample are depicted. Ir(ppy)3 (Tris(2-pbenylpyridine) iridium) is not a dopable electron transport matrix material for OLEDs but serves here as a reference molecule which Iridium central atom can be easily detected by XPS. No XPS signal from Ga was detected. After background subtraction, the areas of the various peaks were determined. These areas need to be corrected for the elemental sensitivity factors specific for the spectrometer and the escape depth variation with the kinetic energy of the photoelectrons. Table 1 summarizes the determined stoichiometry (metal and carbon peaks have been combined using the known molecular structure of the matrix material). Also given in table 1 is the stoichiometry of a Cs doped BPhen layer typically used in OLEDs.













TABLE 1







Cs:Ir(ppy)3
Cs:Alq
Cs:BPben





















Cs
3.2 (1.8 exp.)
3.1 (1.8 exp)
1



Matrixmaterial
1
1
8.1










In a still further embodiment doping of various matrices has been carried out using a Ga7Cs11 alloy. The compound was subjected to heating to 420° C. before use in order to create a protective Ga shell. A total of 15 doped samples have been prepared with one crucible filling (approx. 0.1 g equivalent of pure Cs). Still, no sign of exhaustion has occurred. The sublimation temperature for Cs is around 300° C. This corresponds to an equivalent of about 100 nm of pure Cs in the doped films (source—sample distance approx. 25 cm). Additionally, further Cs is wasted before and after the experiment. It was estimated that the 0.1 g equivalent of pure Cs should be sufficient for 3000 nm total layer thickness of Cs. Table 2 shows examples for the doping process according to this embodiment.













TABLE 2







Nominal doping
Corrected doping
Conduc-



concentration
concentration
tivity



Cs:BPhen
Cs:BPhen
(S/cm)



















Cs:BPhen prepared
1:9
1:5
6.7e−5


using GaCs alloy
  1:7.5
1:4
7.6e−5



 1:18
 1:10
1.5e−6


Cs:BPhen prepared

1:8
  5e−5


using S.A.E.S. getter





Nominal doping concentrations determined from QMB readout, corrected values include non-unity sticking coefficient of Cs






Electrical doping as described above can be advantageously performed by means of a standard evaporator or crucible as used for organic material deposition in vacuum. One preferred evaporator design is of the so called Knudsen type which comprises an electrical heated cylindrical crucible usually used as a point source where a large distance between crucible and the substance to be doped is provided. The Knudsen type evaporator can be extended linearly to provide a linear source.


An alternative linear source comprises a linear evaporator head with holes. The head is connected to an independently heated volume via a heated tube system. Material released from the crucible inside the heated volume is transported through the tube system to the linear evaporator head and released through the holes towards the substance to be doped. In such evaporator the Cesium alloy can be handled as a standard organic material. The crucible can be heated to about 420° C. or less, preferably to about 300° C. or less to release Cesium vapor. The heated tube system and the linear head can be operated at temperatures above the crucible temperature (up to 50° C.) until down to 50° C.


The temperature of the tube system can be kept at a lower temperature than the sublimation temperature in the crucible volume to avoid chemical reactions. Thus less energy is consumed during electrical doping process.


The features disclosed in this specification, claims and/or the figures may be material for the realization of the invention in its various embodiments, taken in isolation or in various combinations thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A method for electrical doping a semiconductor material with Cesium, wherein said semiconductor material is exposed to a Cesium vapor, characterized in that said Cesium vapor is provided by Cesium sublimation from a Cesium alloy.
  • 2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said Cesium vapor is provided by Cesium sublimation from a Gallium Cesium alloy.
  • 3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein said Cesium vapor is provided by Cesium sublimation from a Ga7Cs11 alloy.
  • 4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said semiconductor material is provided as a thin film material.
  • 5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said Cesium sublimation is performed in an evaporator at a sublimation temperature of about 420° C. or less.
  • 6. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein said Cesium sublimation is monitored by a quartz microbalance.
  • 7. The method as claimed in claim 6, wherein said quartz microbalance is cooled by water.
  • 8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said Cesium alloy is provided as a solid material, and said solid material is preheated for generating a protective shell.
  • 9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said semiconductor material is an organic material.
  • 10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said semiconductor material is an organic electron transport material.
  • 11. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said Cesium vapor is provided by Cesium sublimation from a standard organic material deposition evaporator.
  • 12. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein said standard organic material deposition evaporator is a Knudsen type crucible.
  • 13. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein said standard organic material deposition evaporator is linear source type.
  • 14. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein said standard organic material deposition evaporator is an evaporator with a linear head connected to a crucible volume by a tube system.
  • 15. The method as claimed in claim 14, wherein a temperature of said tube system of said standard organic material deposition evaporator is controlled to be below a temperature in said crucible volume.
  • 16. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said Cesium sublimation is performed in an evaporator at a sublimation temperature of about 300° C. or less.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
04023945 Oct 2004 EP regional
US Referenced Citations (90)
Number Name Date Kind
3644770 Bell Feb 1972 A
3673011 Strull Jun 1972 A
4066569 Lim Jan 1978 A
4356429 Tang Oct 1982 A
4618453 Kim Oct 1986 A
4769292 Tang et al. Sep 1988 A
5093698 Egusa Mar 1992 A
5110835 Walter et al. May 1992 A
5247226 Sato et al. Sep 1993 A
5292881 Berneth et al. Mar 1994 A
5556524 Albers Sep 1996 A
5703436 Forrest et al. Dec 1997 A
5736881 Ortiz Apr 1998 A
5757026 Forrest et al. May 1998 A
5811833 Thompson Sep 1998 A
5834893 Bulovic et al. Nov 1998 A
5840217 Lupo et al. Nov 1998 A
5969474 Arai Oct 1999 A
6013384 Kido et al. Jan 2000 A
6046543 Bulovic Apr 2000 A
6111696 Allen et al. Aug 2000 A
6160828 Kozlov et al. Dec 2000 A
6303238 Thompson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6310360 Forrest et al. Oct 2001 B1
6350534 Boerner et al. Feb 2002 B1
6406804 Higashi Jun 2002 B1
6414661 Shen Jul 2002 B1
6423429 Kido et al. Jul 2002 B2
6437769 Kobayashi Aug 2002 B1
6476550 Oda Nov 2002 B1
6501230 Feldman Dec 2002 B1
6555840 Hudson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6566807 Fujita et al. May 2003 B1
6573651 Adachi et al. Jun 2003 B2
6579422 Kakinuma Jun 2003 B1
6614161 Jacobsen Sep 2003 B1
6620528 Yamazaki et al. Sep 2003 B1
6630684 Lee Oct 2003 B2
6645645 Burroughes et al. Nov 2003 B1
6700058 Nelles et al. Mar 2004 B2
6720573 Son Apr 2004 B2
6734457 Yamazaki May 2004 B2
6747287 Toguchi et al. Jun 2004 B1
6835470 Magain Dec 2004 B1
6867538 Adachi Mar 2005 B2
6878297 Berger Apr 2005 B1
6897473 Burroughes et al. May 2005 B1
6900588 Adachi et al. May 2005 B2
6908783 Kuehl et al. Jun 2005 B1
6933522 Lin Aug 2005 B2
6965197 Tyan Nov 2005 B2
7001536 Thompson et al. Feb 2006 B2
7012363 Weaver Mar 2006 B2
7074500 Pfeiffer Jul 2006 B2
7141817 Nishi Nov 2006 B2
7161292 Leo Jan 2007 B2
7256541 Birnstock Aug 2007 B2
20010026124 Yachin et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010035713 Kimusra Nov 2001 A1
20010038102 Takeo Nov 2001 A1
20010055841 Yamazaki et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020015807 Youichirou et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020084993 Teneya Jul 2002 A1
20020098379 Takashi Jul 2002 A1
20030062636 Guangji Apr 2003 A1
20030122813 Ishizuki Jul 2003 A1
20030127973 Weaver et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030146443 Atsushi et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030146888 Yamazaki Aug 2003 A1
20030164679 Takafumi et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030184505 Inukai Oct 2003 A1
20040012980 Sigiura et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040066824 Magno Apr 2004 A1
20040070558 Cok Apr 2004 A1
20040113547 Son Jun 2004 A1
20040183963 Nakamura Sep 2004 A1
20040227446 Akira et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040251816 Leo et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050040390 Pleiffer et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050061232 Werner et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050110009 Biochwitz-Nimoth et al. May 2005 A1
20050142379 Noriyuki Jun 2005 A1
20050145179 Cattaneo et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050236973 Leo et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050280766 Johnson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060033115 Blochwitz et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060044227 Hadcock Mar 2006 A1
20060050032 Gunner et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060071206 Stossell et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060231843 Qin et al. Oct 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
2003229476 Sep 2003 AU
2463377 Aug 2003 CA
19732828 Feb 1999 DE
19916745 Oct 2000 DE
1009204 Aug 2001 DE
10135513 Feb 2003 DE
10207859 Sep 2003 DE
10229231 Jan 2004 DE
10251986 May 2004 DE
10261609 Aug 2004 DE
10307125 Aug 2004 DE
0625843 Nov 1994 EP
1018718 Jul 2000 EP
1227466 Jul 2002 EP
1282101 Feb 2003 EP
1318499 Jun 2003 EP
1365633 Nov 2003 EP
1476881 Nov 2004 EP
1548856 Jun 2005 EP
239203 Feb 1926 GB
2361356 Oct 2001 GB
2388236 Nov 2003 GB
2390215 Dec 2003 GB
59031865 Feb 1984 JP
2004119197 Apr 2004 JP
9948160 Sep 1999 WO
0108230 Feb 2001 WO
0127910 Apr 2001 WO
0193642 Dec 2001 WO
0237580 May 2002 WO
0241414 May 2002 WO
02093664 Nov 2002 WO
03061028 Jul 2003 WO
03069958 Aug 2003 WO
03070822 Aug 2003 WO
03088271 Oct 2003 WO
03094140 Nov 2003 WO
04025615 Mar 2004 WO
04059606 Jul 2004 WO
05086251 Sep 2005 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060079004 A1 Apr 2006 US