Method for enhancement of mechanical strength and CO2 storage in cementitious products

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10894743
  • Patent Number
    10,894,743
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 27, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 19, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
A method for curing cementitious articles includes flowing dry steam and carbon dioxide (CO2) simultaneously into a curing chamber containing a cementitious article. A relative humidity within the curing chamber may be between about 50% and about 70% and a temperature within the curing chamber may be between about 50° C. and about 70° C. A dry steam and CO2 mixture with a CO2 concentration between 2.5 vol % and 40 vol % is provided in the curing chamber and the cementitious article is cured for a duration between about 4 hours and 16 hours. Cementitious products cured with the method may have a CO2 uptake of greater than 15 wt % and a mechanical strength at least 10% greater than a cementitious product cured only in dry steam or CO2.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present specification generally relates to a method of curing cementitious articles and, more specifically, a method of curing cementitious articles using steam plus carbon dioxide.


SUMMARY

Cementitious products such as concrete blocks, concrete steps, concrete counter tops, etc., may be commercially produced by forming a desired shape from a concrete mixture in a molding machine followed by curing. The concrete mixture may include a cement binder, sand, aggregate and water. The concrete mixture typically flows from a hopper into a product mold and a cementitious article with a desired shape is formed within the mold. The cementitious articles are then cured to form a cementitious product. The cementitious article may be cured slowly, for example, between 7 to 30 days, by exposure to air.


Accelerated curing may be used to increase the productivity of manufacturing cementitious products. Particularly, accelerated curing may be used to provide stable cementitious products relatively quickly, thereby reducing the time before the cementitious products can be shipped as finished products. Accelerated curing typically involves placing the concrete products in an enclosure or chamber, often referred to as a curing chamber, and controlling the temperature and relative humidity in the curing chamber for several hours. The cementitious products may sit in the curing chamber between about 8 to 48 hours before the cementitious products are sufficiently cured for packaging and shipping. However, energy requirements for accelerated curing may be cost prohibitive. Accordingly, a need exists for alternative methods of curing cementitious articles.


One embodiment for curing cementitious articles includes providing a cementitious article formed from a mixture of a cement binder, sand, aggregate, and water. The cement binder contains Ca3SiO5. The cementitious article is placed in a curing chamber, and a curing relative humidity between about 40% and about 80% and a curing temperature between about 50° C. and about 150° C., are maintained within the curing chamber. The cementitious article is cured by flowing a mixture of dry steam and CO2 into the curing chamber while maintaining the curing relative humidity and the curing temperature for a duration between about 4 and about 24 hours. The concentration of CO2 in the mixture of dry steam and CO2 is between about 2.5% and about 20.0% and/or the concentration of CO2 in the curing chamber is between about 2.5% and about 50%, by volume and the cured cementitious article has a CO2 uptake of at least 15%, by weight.


Another embodiment for curing cementitious articles includes providing a cementitious article formed from a mixture of a cement binder, sand, aggregate, and water. The cement binder contains Ca3SiO5 and the cementitious article is placed in a curing chamber. A curing relative humidity between about 40% and about 80% and a curing temperature between about 50° C. and about 150° C. are maintained within the curing chamber. The cementitious article is cured by flowing a mixture of dry steam and CO2 into the curing chamber while maintaining the curing relative humidity and the curing temperature for a duration between about 4 and about 24 hours. The concentration of CO2 in the mixture of dry steam and CO2 is between about 2.5% and about 20.0% and/or the concentration of CO2 in the curing chamber is between about 2.5% and about 50%, by volume, and Ca(OH)2 is formed in the cementitious article by at least one of the reactions

2Ca3SiO5(s)+7H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3Ca(OH)2(s),
and
2Ca3SiO5(s)+7H2O(g)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3Ca(OH)2(s).

Also, CO2 from the mixture of dry steam and CO2 reacts with the cementitious article to form CaCO3 in the cementitious article by at least one of the reactions

2Ca3SiO5(s)+3CO2(g)+4H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3CaCO3(s),
and
Ca(OH)2(s)+CO2(g)→CaCO3(s)+H2O(l).

In embodiments, the cured cementitious article has a CO2 uptake of at least 15%, by weight, for example at least 20%, by weight.


In another embodiment, a method for storing carbon dioxide in a cementitious article includes providing a mixture of dry steam and CO2, with a concentration of CO2 between about 2.5% and 20.0% and/or the concentration of CO2 in the curing chamber is between about 2.5% and about 50%, by volume, and providing a cementitious article formed from a mixture of a cement binder, sand, aggregate, and water. The cement binder includes Ca3SiO5. The cementitious article is placed into a curing chamber and a curing relative humidity between about 50% and about 70% and a curing temperature between about 50° C. and about 70° C. are maintained within the curing temperature. The mixture of dry steam and CO2 is introduced and flows into the curing chamber for a duration between 4 and 24 hours thereby curing the cementitious article. The chemical compound Ca(OH)2 is formed within the cementitious article by at least one of the reactions

2Ca3SiO5(s)+7H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3Ca(OH)2(s),
and
2Ca3SiO5(s)+7H2O(g)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3Ca(OH)2(s).

Also, CO2 from the mixture of dry steam and CO2 reacts with at least one of the Ca3SiO5 and Ca(OH)2 within the cementitious article to form CaCO3 in the cementitious article by at least one of the reactions

2Ca3SiO5(s)+3CO2(g)+4H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3CaCO3(s),
and
Ca(OH)2(s)+CO2(g)→CaCO3(s)+H2O(l).

A CO2 uptake in the cementitious article cured with the gas mixture of dry steam and CO2 is at least 15%, by weight.


In another embodiment, a cementitious product is prepared by a process that includes pouring a concrete mixture into a mold and forming a cementitious article. The concrete mixture includes a cement binder with Ca3SiO5, aggregate and water. The cementitious article is placed in a curing chamber for a duration between 6 hours and 10 hours. The curing chamber may have a curing environment with a temperature between about 50° C. and 70° C., and a relative humidity between about 50% and about 70%. Dry steam and CO2 are introduced into and flows within the curing chamber and a cured cementitious article is formed. A concentration, in volume percent (vol %), of CO2 in the dry steam and CO2 flowing into the curing chamber is between about 5 vol % and 10 vol %, and the dry steam and CO2 flows into and through pores of the cementitious article. The chemical compound Ca(OH)2 is formed within the cementitious article by at least one of the reactions

2Ca3SiO5(s)+7H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3Ca(OH)2(s),
and
2Ca3SiO5(s)+7H2O(g)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3Ca(OH)2(s).

Also, CO2 reacts with the cementitious article to form CaCO3 in the cementitious article by at least one of the reactions

2Ca3SiO5(s)+3CO2(g)+4H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3CaCO3(s),
and
Ca(OH)2(s)+CO2(g)→CaCO3(s)+H2O(l).

The cured cementitious article is removed from the curing chamber and has a CO2 uptake, in weight percent (wt %) greater than or equal to 15 wt %. In some embodiments, the CO2 uptake in the cured cementitious article is greater than or equal to 20 wt %. In other embodiments, the CO2 uptake in the cured cementitious article is greater than or equal to 25 wt %.


Additional features and advantages will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the description or recognized by practicing the embodiments as described in the written description and claims hereof, as well as the appended drawings.


It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are merely exemplary, and are intended to provide an overview or framework to understand the nature and character of the claims. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate one or more embodiments, and together with the description serve to explain principles and operation of the various embodiments.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is schematically depicts a process for curing cementitious articles according to one or more embodiments described herein;



FIG. 2 schematically depicts a curing chamber for curing cementitious articles according to one or more embodiments described herein;



FIG. 3 graphically depicts compressive strength for three sets of concrete samples cured in a curing chamber as depicted in FIG. 2 using curing environments containing different amounts of steam and CO2; and



FIG. 4 graphically depicts x-ray diffraction scans for three sets of concrete samples cured in a curing chamber as depicted in FIG. 2 using curing environments containing different amounts of steam and CO2.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following text sets forth a broad description of numerous embodiments of the present disclosure. The description is to be construed as illustrative only and does not describe every possible embodiment sense describing every possible embodiment would be impractical, if not impossible, and it will be understood that any feature, characteristic, component, composition, product, step or methodology described herein can be deleted, combined with or substitute four, in whole or part, any other feature, characteristic, component, composition, product, step or methodology described herein. Numerous alternative embodiments could be implemented, using either current technology or technology developed after the filing date of this patent, which would still fall within the scope of the claims.


Referring to FIG. 1, a method 10 for curing cementitious articles includes flowing a mixture of steam and carbon dioxide (CO2) (also referred to herein as “steam plus CO2” or “steam plus CO2 gas mixture”) simultaneously into a curing chamber with a cementitious article (also referred to herein as a “concrete article”) located therein. As used herein, the term “cementitious article(s)” or “concrete article(s)” refers to an article formed from a concrete mixture before being cured and ready for shipment as a final product, and the term “cementitious product(s)” of “concrete product(s)” refers to a cementitious article that has been cured and is ready for shipment as a final product. Also, as used herein the term “steam” refers to “dry steam”, i.e., water in the gas phase (H2O(g)) and the term “CO2” refers to CO2 in the gas phase unless otherwise stated.


The concentration of CO2 in the mixture of steam and CO2, in volume percent (vol %), flowing into the curing chamber may be between about 2.5 vol % and about 40 vol %. That is, the volume of CO2 relative to the total volume of steam plus CO2 that flows into the curing chamber is between about 2.5 vol % and about 40 vol %. The steam and CO2 reacts with compounds in the cementitious product, particularly tricalcium silicate, to form calcium hydroxide and calcium carbonate, both of which increase the strength of the cementitious product. Also, the CO2 may react with calcium hydroxide formed during curing of the cementitious article to form calcium carbonate thereby sequestering CO2 in the cementitious product. In embodiments, the amount of calcium hydroxide formed during early stages of curing is regulated such that the heat of hydration within the cementitious article is reduced compared to curing without CO2. Not being bound by theory, the reduced heat of hydration within the cementitious article results in less thermal expansion of the cementitious article during early stages of curing and a reduction in microcracks formed within the cementitious article. The reduction of microcracks within the cementitious article results in an increase in strength for the cured cementitious product.


Still referring to FIG. 1, the method 10 includes mixing concrete at step 100. As used herein the term “concrete” refers to mixture of a cement binder, aggregate and water. The cement binder may be a Portland cement binder containing tricalcium silicate (Ca3SiO5 or 3CaO.SiO2), dicalcium silicate (Ca2SiO4 or 2CaO.SiO2), tricalcium aluminate (Ca3Al2O6 or 3CaO.Al2O3.Fe2O3), tetracalcium aluminoferrite (Ca4.Al2Fe2O10 or 4CaO.Al2O3.Fe2O3) and gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O). One non-limiting composition of a Portland cement binder is provided in Table 1 below.












TABLE 1







Compound
Weight Percent



















tricalcium silicate
50



dicalcium silicate
25



tricalcium aluminate
10



tetracalcium aluminoferrite
10



Gypsum
5











While Table 1 provides a composition of a Portland cement binder, it should be understood that the method, and cementitious products formed by the method described herein, may include other types of cement binders. Non-limiting examples of cement binders that may be used with the method described herein include rapid hardening cement binders, low heat cement binders, sulfate resisting cement binders, white cement binders, pozzolanic cement binders, hydrophobic cement binders, colored cement binders, waterproof cement binders, blast furnace cement binders, air entraining cement binders, high alumina cement binders and expansive cement binders.


Aggregate within the cement binder may include chemically inert and solid bodies. The aggregate may have various shapes and sizes, and may be made from various materials ranging from fine particles of sand to large, course rocks. The aggregate may include ultra-light aggregate, light weight aggregate, normal weight aggregate, and heavyweight aggregate. Non-limiting examples of ultra-light weight aggregate include vermiculite, ceramics spheres and perlite. Light weight aggregate may include expanded clay, shale or slate, or crushed brick. Normal weight aggregate may include crushed limestone, sand, river gravel, or crushed recycled a concrete, and heavyweight aggregate may include steel or iron shot, or steel or iron pellets.


In addition to the cement binder, aggregate and water, admixtures may be added to a concrete mixture to increase the durability, workability, strength, etc., of the concrete mixture and/or a cementitious product formed from the concrete mixture. For example, air entraining admixtures in the form of detergents may be added to concrete mixtures to improve durability and workability of the concrete mixture. Superplasticizer admixtures (e.g., polymer additives) may be added to increase strength of the cementitious product by decreasing water needed for workable concrete. Retarding admixtures such as sugar may be used to delay setting times of a concrete mixture and increase long-term strength of a cementitious product. In the alternative, accelerating admixtures such as calcium chloride may be added to speed setting time of a concrete mixture and improve early strength of a cementitious article. Mineral admixtures such as flyash may be added to improve work ability, plasticity and strength, and pigment admixtures such as metal oxides may be added to provide color to a cementitious product.


The concrete mixture is poured into a mold at step 102 and a cementitious article is formed in the shape of the mold. Non-limiting examples of molds and formed cementitious articles include blocks (commonly referred to as concrete blocks), stairs, countertops, pre-fabricated concrete walls, etc. The cementitious article is placed within a curing chamber at step 104. The temperature within the enclosure 200 (also referred to herein as the “curing temperature”) may be controlled. For example, the curing temperature within the enclosure 200 may be between about 40° C. and about 80° C. In embodiments, the curing temperature within the enclosure 200 may be between about 50° C. and about 70° C. In other embodiments, the curing temperature within the enclosure 200 may be between about 55° C. and about 65° C. In still other embodiments, curing temperature within the enclosure 200 may be between about 57° C. and about 63° C. The relative humidity within the enclosure 200 (also referred to herein as the “curing relative humidity”) may also be controlled. For example, the curing relative humidity within the enclosure 200 may be between about 40% and about 80%. In embodiments, the curing relative humidity within the enclosure 200 may be between about 50% and about 70%. In other embodiments, the curing relative humidity within the enclosure 200 may be between about 55% and about 65%. In still other embodiments, the curing relative humidity within the enclosure 200 may be between about 57% and about 63%.


In embodiments, the cementitious article may be air cured prior to placing in the curing chamber at step 103. As used herein, the term “air cured” refers to curing a cementitious article in ambient conditions, i.e., at ambient temperature and ambient relative humidity. For example, the cementitious article may be cured in ambient air for a duration between about 1 hour and 8 hours, for example 2 hours. In other embodiments, the cementitious article is not air cured prior to placing in the curing chamber at stop 104.


After the cementitious particle is placed within the curing chamber at step 104, a steam plus CO2 gas mixture is introduced into the curing chamber at step 108. In embodiments, steam flows into the curing chamber through a first inlet and the CO2 flows into the curing chamber through a second inlet that is different than the first inlet. In other embodiments, the steam plus CO2 gas mixture is introduced into the curing chamber through the single inlet. The steam may be generated at step 106. For example, steam from a power boiler, a heat recovery system, and the like, may be pumped into the enclosure 200. The concentration of CO2 in the steam plus CO2 gas mixture may be between about 2.5 vol % and about 40.0 vol %. For example, the concentration of CO2 in the steam plus CO2 gas mixture may be equal to or greater than 2.5 vol %, 3.0 vol %, 3.5 vol %, 4.0 vol %, 4.5 vol %, 5.0 vol %, 5.5 vol %, 6.0 vol %, 6.5 vol %, 7.0 vol %, 7.5 vol %, 8.0 vol %, 8.5 vol %, 9.0 vol %, 9.5 vol %, 10.0 vol %, 10.5 vol %, 11.0 vol %, 11.5 vol %, 12.0 vol %, 12.5 vol %, 13.0 vol %, 13.5 vol %, 14.0 vol %, 14.5 vol %, 15.0 vol %, or 15.5 vol %, 16.0 vol %, 18.0 vol %, 20.0 vol %, 25.0 vol %, 30.0 vol %, or 35.0 vol %, and less than or equal to 40.0 vol %, 35.0 vol %, 30.0 vol %, 25.0 vol %, 20.0 vol %, 19.5 vol %, 19.0 vol %, 18.5 vol %, 18.0 vol %, 17.5 vol %, 17.0 vol %, 16.5 vol %, 16.0 vol %, 15.5 vol %, 15.0 vol %, 14.5 vol %, 14.0 vol %, 13.5 vol %, 13.0 vol %, 12.5 vol %, 12.0 vol %, 11.5 vol %, 11.0 vol %, 10.5 vol %, 10.0 vol %, 9.5 vol %, 9.0 vol %, 8.5 vol %, 8.0 vol %, 7.5 vol %, 7.0 vol %, 6.5 vol %, 6.0 vol %, or 5.5 vol %. In embodiments, the concentration of CO2 in the steam plus CO2 gas mixture may be between about 2.5 vol % and about 15.0 vol %. In other embodiments, the concentration of CO2 in the steam plus CO2 gas mixture may be between about 2.5 vol % and about 10.0 vol %.


The cementitious article is cured within the curing chamber at step 108 for a duration between about 2 hours and 24 hours. For example, the cementitious article may be cured within the curing chamber at step 108 for a duration between about 4 hours and about 16 hours. In embodiments, the cementitious article may be cured within the curing chamber for a duration between 6 hours and about 12 hours. In other embodiments, the cementitious article may be cured within the curing chamber for a duration between about 7 hours and about 9 hours, for example about 8 hours. During curing within the curing chamber, the steam plus CO2 gas mixture flows into and through pores of the cementitious article and reacts with the cement binder to form calcium hydroxide and calcium carbonate as discussed in greater detail below. Formation of the calcium hydroxide and calcium carbonate within the cementitious article has a twofold benefit during the curing process. Particularly, formation of the calcium hydroxide and calcium carbonate results in an increase in strength of the cementitious article and formation of the calcium carbonate results in CO2 uptake (CO2 sequestration) by the cementitious article. As used herein, the term “CO2 uptake” or “CO2 sequestration” refers to the long term storage of CO2 within a cementitious article or cementitious product. In embodiments, the cured cementitious article may have a CO2 uptake, in weight percent (wt %) greater than or equal to 15 wt %. In other embodiments, the cured cementitious article may have a CO2 uptake greater than or equal to 20 wt %. In still other embodiments, the cured cementitious article may have a CO2 uptake greater than or equal to 25 wt %.


The cured cementitious article (cementitious product) is removed from the curing chamber at step 110. The cementitious product may be further cured with air curing plus water spraying at step 112. The air curing plus water spraying of the cementitious product may include curing in air and spraying with water twice a day for a total of 7 days. The cementitious product may also be further cured using air curing at step 114. For example, the cementitious product may be air cured for an additional 28 days.


During curing within the curing chamber at step 108, water reacts with, and results in the hydration of the compounds of the cement binder. It should be understood that only hydration of the calcium silicates may contribute to the strength cementitious product and tricalcium silicate may be responsible for most of the strength developed within the first seven days of curing and hydration of dicalcium silicate may be responsible for strength obtained at longer times. Hydration of tricalcium silicate occurs via the chemical reaction:

2Ca3SiO5(s)+7H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3Ca(OH)2(s)  (1)
and hydration of dicalcium silicate occurs via the chemical reaction:
2Ca2SiO4(s)+5H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+Ca(OH)2(s)  (2)

In embodiments, the dry steam condenses into liquid water which reacts with the tricalcium silicate to form calcium hydroxide. That is, the dry steam flows into and condenses within pores of the cementitious article to provide moisture (water) within the pores that reacts with the tricalcium silicate to form calcium hydroxide. In the alternative, or in addition to, the dry steam reacts directly with the tricalcium silicate to form calcium hydroxide via the chemical reaction:

2Ca3SiO5(s)+7H2O(g)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)  (3)

Also, the dry steam may provide heat, either through heat of condensation or heat of conduction, to the tricalcium silicate which may enhance the kinetics of calcium hydroxide formation.


During curing within the curing chamber at step 108, the CO2 in the mixture of steam and CO2 reacts with the calcium silicates of the cement binder to form calcium carbonate. Particularly, CO2 diffuses within the pores of the cementitious article and solvates with water to form CO2 (aq), which in turn hydrates to form carbonic acid (H2CO3). The carbonic acid ionizes to form ions of H+, HCO3, and CO32− The H+ ions reduce the pH of the cementitious system which in turn results in the dissolution of the tricalcium silicate and dicalcium silicate to release ions of Ca2+ and SiO44−. The Ca2+ ions react with the CO32− ions to form calcium carbonate (CaCO3). The overall reaction of CO2 with tricalcium silicate is:

2Ca3SiO5(s)+3CO2(g)+4H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3CaCO3(s)  (4)
and the overall reaction of CO2 with dicalcium silicate is:
4Ca2SiO2(s)+2CO2(g)+8H2O(l)→2(3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O)(s)+2CaCO3(s)  (5)

In addition to CO2 reacting with the calcium silicates, the calcium hydroxide formed by the reaction of the calcium silicates with water (e.g., via reactions (1), (2) and/or (3) above) may be converted to calcium carbonate via the overall reaction:

Ca(OH)2(s)+CO2(g)→CaCO3(s)+H2O(l)  (6)

Accordingly, the CO2 may reduce the amount of calcium hydroxide in the cementitious product while increasing the amount of calcium carbonate.


It should be understood that the reaction of CO2 with tricalcium silicate in the cementitious article to form calcium carbonate, and the reaction of CO2 with calcium hydroxide to form calcium carbonate, increases the strength of the cementitious product. The CO2 also prevents the formation of at least a portion of calcium hydroxide that would form per reactions (1), (2) and/or (3) above, in the absence of CO2 and/or converts a portion of the formed calcium hydroxide into calcium carbonate. That is, the presence of CO2 not only results in the formation of calcium carbonate, but also regulates the formation and amount of calcium hydroxide within cementitious article formed using the method described herein. Such a regulation (e.g., reduction) of the formation of calcium hydroxide may result in a reduction of the heat of hydration within the cementitious article when compared to curing in only steam. Not being bound by theory, the reduction of the heat of hydration within the cementitious article may result in less thermal expansion of and less microcracks in the cementitious article during early stages of curing. It should be understood that the reduction of microcracks within the cementitious article results in an increase in strength by the cementitious product. That is, with less flaws (microcracks) in the cementitious product, an increase in strength is observed when compared to curing in only steam.


Referring now to FIG. 2, a curing chamber 20 for curing cementitious articles using the method described herein is depicted. The curing chamber 20 includes an enclosure 200 defined by walls 210, a floor 220, and a roof 230. A plurality of cementitious articles 205 may be placed within the enclosure 200. A first inlet 240 and a second inlet 250 are included and may be used for flowing the mixture of steam and CO2 into the enclosure 200. In embodiments, the steam may flow into the enclosure 200 through one inlet (inlet 240) and the CO2, e.g., pure (100 vol %) CO2, may flow into the enclosure 200 through a separate inlet (inlet 250). In the alternative, a single inlet, e.g., the first inlet 240 or the second inlet 250, may be used to flow the mixture of steam and CO2 into the enclosure 200. A humidifier 260 and a heater 270 may be included to control the relative humidity and temperature within the enclosure 200 of the curing chamber 20.


It should be understood that the concentration of CO2 in the mixture of steam and CO2 provides for a desired combination of calcium hydroxide and calcium carbonate in the cementitious product. Particularly, the concentration of CO2 in the mixture of steam and CO2 introduced into the enclosure 200 of the curing chamber 20 results in a desired amount of calcium hydroxide to be formed such that a given amount of calcium hydroxide is present to provide strength and a given amount is present for reaction with CO2 to form calcium carbonate (e.g., per reaction (6) above) to provide strength and sequester CO2.


The method for forming cementitious products as embodied above may be used to form any appropriate cementitious product. Non-limiting examples of article's formed by embodiments of the method include concrete blocks, concrete steps, concrete counter tops and pre-fabricated concrete walls and structures. Various embodiments will be further clarified by the following examples.


EXAMPLES

Referring now to FIGS. 1-2, three sets of concrete compression samples were prepared and cured under different environments in order to determine the effect of curing with a mixture of steam and CO2. The three sets of concrete samples were prepared using the same amount type of cement binder and aggregate, and the same amount of water. The first set of concrete samples were cured using the following curing procedure: air curing for 2 hours; curing in steam for 8 hours (i.e., steam only); curing in air plus water spraying twice a day for a total of 7 days; curing in air for 28 days. The second set of concrete samples were cured using the following curing procedure: air curing for 2 hours; curing in steam plus 10 vol % CO2 for 8 hours (i.e., steam plus 5 vol % CO2); curing in air plus water spraying twice a day for a total of 7 days; curing in air for 28 days. The third set of concrete samples were cured using the following curing procedure: air curing for 2 hours; curing in CO2 for 8 hours (i.e., CO2 only); curing in air plus water spraying twice a day for a total of 7 days; curing in air for 28 days. A summary of the curing procedures for each of the three sets of samples is summarized in Table 2 below. The curing in steam, steam plus 5 vol % CO2, and CO2 was performed in a curing chamber as depicted in FIG. 2. The temperature within the curing chamber was 60° C. and the relative humidity was 60%. Accordingly, the only variable during curing of the three sets of samples was the steam and CO2 concentrations.












TABLE 2






Sample Set #1
Sample Set #2
Sample Set #3


Curing Step
(Atmosphere/Time)
(Atmosphere/Time)
(Atmosphere/Time)







Step 1
Air/2 h
Air/2 h
Air/2 h


Step 2*
Steam/8 h
Steam + 10 vol % CO2/8 h
CO2/8 h


Step 3
Air + water spraying 2x
Air + water spraying 2x
Air + water spraying 2x



a day/7 days
a day/7 days
a day/7 days


Step 4
Air/28 days
Air/28 days
Air/28 days





*Step 2 was performed in a curing chamber with a temperature of 60° C. and a relative humidity of 60%






The three sets of samples were each subjected to compressive strength testing after curing within the curing chamber for 8 hours and after air curing with water spraying twice a day for 7 days. The results of the compressive strength testing are shown in FIG. 3. After curing for 8 hours in the curing chamber, the first set of samples (steam only) had a compressive strength of 22.5 megapascals (MPa), the second set of samples (steam plus 10 vol % CO2) had a compressive of strength of 24.2 MPa, and the third set of samples (CO2 only) had a compressive strength of 4.7 MPa. Accordingly, the second set of samples (steam plus 10 vol % CO2) had a 7.6% increase in strength compared to the first set of samples (steam only) and a 415% increase in strength compared to the third set of samples (CO2 only). After air curing plus water spraying twice a day for 7 days, the first set of samples (steam only) had a compressive strength of 29.8 MPa, the second set of samples (steam plus 10 vol % CO2) had a compressive strength of 34.8 MPa, and the third set of samples (CO2 only) had a compressive strength of 29.2 MPa. Accordingly, the second set of samples (steam plus 10 vol % CO2) had a 16.8% increase in strength compared to the first set of samples (steam only) and a 19.2% increase in strength compared to the third set of samples (CO2 only).


The three sets of samples were also analyzed for CO2 uptake and the results are summarized in Table 3 below. As shown in Table 3 below, the first set of samples (steam only) had an average CO2 uptake, in weight percent (wt %), of 6.25 wt %. The second set of samples (steam plus 10 vol % CO2) had an average CO2 uptake of 20.05 wt %. The third set of samples (CO2 only) had an average CO2 uptake of 9.2 wt %. Accordingly, the second set of samples (steam plus 10 vol % CO2) had a 220% increase in CO2 uptake compared to the first set of samples (steam only) and a 118% increase in CO2 uptake compared to the third set of samples (CO2 only). Accordingly, curing with steam plus 10 vol % CO2 provided enhanced CO2 sequestration compared to curing in pure CO2. As noted above, and not being bound by theory, the concentration of CO2 in the steam plus CO2 gas mixture introduced into the interior 250 of the curing chamber 20 results in a desired amount of calcium hydroxide that may provide strength to cementitious products and serve as a source for calcium carbonate formation.












TABLE 3







Sample 2



Sample Set ↓↓
Sample 1 (wt %)
(wt %)
Average (wt %)


















Steam Only
6.0
6.5
6.25


Steam + 10 vol %
20.0
20.1
20.05


CO2


CO2 Only
8.9
9.5
9.2









The three sets of samples were also analyzed for phase or compound identification after the 7 days of air curing with water spraying using x-ray diffraction (XRD) and FIG. 4 graphically depicts XRD scans of each of the three samples. Regarding the XRD scan for the first set of samples (labeled “Steam”), a relatively high peak for calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) is observed while a relatively low peak is observed for calcium carbonate. Regarding the XRD scan for the third set of samples (labeled “CO2”) a relatively low peak is observed for calcium hydroxide and a relatively high peak is observed for calcium carbonate. This result is in agreement with the CO2 uptake shown in Table 3. However, referring to the XRD scan for the second set of samples (steam plus CO2), a relatively low peak is observed for calcium hydroxide and the highest peak for calcium carbonate (compared to the first and third set of samples) is observed. Accordingly, the XRD scans, in agreement with the CO2 uptake results shown in Table 3, demonstrate curing with the steam plus CO2 gas mixtures described herein enhances the CO2 sequestration by cementitious products when compared to curing with steam only and CO2 only.


Because the method for forming cementitious products described herein uses a mixture of steam and CO2, the CO2 uptake by cementitious articles is significantly enhanced compared to curing in only steam and curing in only CO2. Also, the mixture of steam and CO2 described herein may provide an increase in strength for cementitious products. Not being bound by theory, the increase in strength is due to the formation and increased amounts of calcium carbonate within the cementitious products and/or a reduction in flaws within the cementitious products. Such an increase in CO2 uptake and strength for cementitious products manufactured using the method described herein may reduce the cost of manufacturing and provide sources for a CO2 sequestration.


Unless otherwise expressly stated, it is in no way intended that any methods set forth herein be construed as requiring that its steps be performed in a specific order. Accordingly, where a method claim does not actually recite an order to be followed by its steps or it is not otherwise specifically stated in the claims or descriptions that the steps are to be limited to a specific order, it is no way intended that any particular order be inferred.


As used herein, the term “about” means that amounts, sizes, formulations, parameters, and other quantities and characteristics are not and need not be exact, but may be approximate and/or larger or smaller, as desired, reflecting tolerances, conversion factors, rounding off, measurement error and the like, and other factors known to those of skill in the art. In general, an amount, size, formulation, parameter or other quantity or characteristic is “about” or “approximate” whether or not expressly stated to be such.


The term “or”, as used herein, is inclusive; more specifically, the phrase “A or B” means “A, B, or both A and B.” Exclusive “or” is designated herein by terms such as “either A or B” and “one of A or B,” for example.


The indefinite articles “a” and “an” are employed to describe elements and components of the invention. The use of these articles means that one or at least one of these elements or components is present. Although these articles are conventionally employed to signify that the modified noun is a singular noun, as used herein the articles “a” and “an” also include the plural, unless otherwise stated in specific instances. Similarly, the definite article “the”, as used herein, also signifies that the modified noun may be singular or plural, again unless otherwise stated in specific instances.


It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Since modifications, combinations, sub-combinations and variations of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the disclosure may occur to persons skilled in the art, the scope of the disclosure should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method for curing cementitious articles, the method comprising: providing a cementitious article formed from a mixture of a cement binder, aggregate, and water, the cement binder comprising Ca3SiO5;placing the cementitious article in a curing chamber;maintaining a curing relative humidity between about 40% and about 80% within the curing chamber;maintaining a curing temperature between about 50° C. and about 80° C. within the curing chamber;curing the cementitious article by flowing a mixture of dry steam and CO2 into the curing chamber while maintaining the curing relative humidity and the curing temperature for a duration between about 4 hours and about 24 hours, wherein a concentration of CO2 in the mixture of dry steam and CO2 is between about 2.5% and about 20.0%, by volume,Ca(OH)2 is formed by at least one of the reactions 2Ca3SiO5(s)+7H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3Ca(OH)2(s), and2Ca3SiO5(s)+7H2O(g)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3Ca(OH)2(s),CO2 from the mixture of dry steam and CO2 reacts with the cementitious article to form CaCO3 in the cementitious article by at least one of the reactions 2Ca3SiO5(s)+3CO2(g)+4H2O(l)→3CaO.2SiO2.4H2O(s)+3CaCO3(s), andCa(OH)2(s)+CO2(g)→CaCO3(s)+H2O(l), andthe cured cementitious article comprises a CO2 uptake equal to or greater than 15%, by weight.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein flowing the mixture of dry steam and CO2 into the curing chamber comprises flowing dry steam into the curing chamber through a first inlet and flowing pure CO2 into the curing chamber through a second inlet that is different than the first inlet, and flowing of the dry steam through the first inlet and flowing of the CO2 through the second inlet a maintains the concentration of CO2 between about 2.5% and about 20.0%, by volume, in the curing chamber.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the concentration of CO2 in the mixture of dry steam and CO2 flowing into the curing chamber is between about 5% and about 10%, by volume.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the curing relative humidity is between about 50% and about 70%.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the curing temperature is between about 50° C. and about 70° C.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the cementitious article is cured in the curing chamber for a duration between about 4 hours and about 16 hours.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the cementitious article is cured in the curing chamber between about 6 hours and about 10 hours.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the cured cementitious article comprises greater than or equal to 20%, by weight, CO2 uptake.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the cured cementitious article comprises greater than or equal to 25%, by weight, CO2 uptake.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising curing the cementitious article in air prior to curing the cementitious article in the curing chamber for a duration between about 1 hour and about 4 hours.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising air curing and water spraying the cementitious article after curing the cementitious article in the curing chamber.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising air curing the cementitious article after air curing and water spraying the cementitious article.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 comprising: maintaining the curing relative humidity between about 50% and about 70% within the curing chamber; andmaintaining a curing temperature between about 50° C. and about 70° C. within the curing chamber.
US Referenced Citations (7)
Number Name Date Kind
3238279 Tarlton et al. Mar 1966 A
3759328 Ueber Sep 1973 A
5624493 Wagh et al. Apr 1997 A
8845940 Niven et al. Sep 2014 B2
20110296872 Eisenberger Dec 2011 A1
20140322083 Kuppler et al. Oct 2014 A1
20160236984 Riman et al. Aug 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
644615 Oct 1950 GB
2014160168 Oct 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 24, 2018 pertaining to International Application No. PCT/US2018/027068, 14 pages.
Li, Ze-Hua et al., “Effect of steam on CaO regeneration, carbonation and hydration reactions for CO2 capture” Fuel Processing Technology, Jun. 4, 2016, pp. 101-106, vol. 151, Elsevier BV, NL.
“Effect of carbon dioxide-air concentration in the rapid curing process on the properties of cement-bonded particleboard”, Hermawan et al., J. Wood Science (2002), pp. 179-184.
“CO2 curing for improving the properties of concrete blocks containing recycled aggregates”, Baojian, et al., Cement & concrete Composites (2013), pp. 1-8.
Examination Report pertaining to Application No. GC 2018-35305 dated Dec. 29, 2019.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190194074 A1 Jun 2019 US