The present invention concerns a method of erecting a wind power installation and a lifting beam for mounting a rotor blade of a wind power installation.
When mounting the rotor blades of a wind power installation, the rotor blades are exposed to the weather conditions without being protected. In accordance with EN 13000 mounting of rotor blades of a wind power installation is permissible only up to a given wind speed. If that wind speed should be exceeded then the rotor blade may not be mounted.
On the German patent application from which priority is claimed the German Patent and Trade Mark Office searched the following document: Prospekt Rotorblatttraverse Ematec, 1014.
Provided is a method of erecting a wind power installation, which can be effected even at higher wind speeds.
Thus there is provided a method of erecting a wind power installation which has an aerodynamic rotor having rotor blade connections. A lifting beam has a ballast unit and is fixed to a crane hook of a crane. A rotor blade is fixed to a second crane hook at an underside of the ballast unit by means of lifting cables. The lifting beam and the rotor blade are lifted by the crane for mounting the rotor blade at one of the rotor blade connections. The ballast unit serves to increase the overall weight of the lifting beam so that a rotor blade can be mounted even at higher wind speeds.
According to an aspect of the present invention the ballast unit has at least one ballast weight and the ballast weight is so selected that the ratio between the area of the rotor blade and the sum of the ballast weight and the weight of the rotor blade ≤1.
According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a winch unit at the rotor of the wind power installation. The rotor blade root of the rotor blade to be mounted is fixed to a hook of the winch unit. The rotor blade is lifted by means of the winch unit and the crane.
The present invention also concerns a lifting beam for mounting a rotor blade of a wind power installation. The lifting beam has a ballast unit and at least one suspension point for receiving a crane hook at a top side of the ballast unit. The lifting beam further has a hook at the underside of the ballast unit, and a ballast weight.
According to an aspect of the present invention a rotor blade of the wind power installation is fixed to a crane hook by way of a lifting beam in order then subsequently to raise the rotor blade. The lifting beam has a ballast unit having at least one ballast weight. The use of ballast weights in the lifting beam when mounting the rotor blades serves to increase the overall weight (rotor blade+lifting beam). An increase in the weight to be transported by the crane initially appears to be counterproductive but has the advantage that in that way the ratio between the area of the rotor blades to the load of the rotor blades is increased.
The formula for calculating the maximum permissible wind speeds when mounting the rotor blades depends on the mobile crane being used and is ascertained in accordance with EN 13000. In particular the ratio of the area of the component to be mounted to the load of the component is of great significance. At the maximum permissible wind speed the ratio of area to load may not be greater than 1. With the modern rotor blades of wind power installations however that ratio can be markedly greater than 1.
Further configurations of the invention are subject-matter of the appendant claims.
Advantages and embodiments by way of example of the invention are described in greater detail hereinafter with reference to the drawing.
The lifting beam having a ballast unit 300 is used to increase the weight to be lifted by the crane 400. The invention is based on the notion that, by increasing the weight to be lifted by the crane 400, the ratio between the area of the component to be mounted (here a rotor blade) to the weight of the component is reduced, by virtue of the weight to be lifted being increased by the ballast weight of the ballast unit 300. It is possible in that way to ensure that the rotor blade can be mounted even at higher wind speeds.
The ballast weights 330 can be fixed within the frame.
According to an aspect of the present invention a parking means or a parking unit 322 can be provided, by means of which the lifting beam can be set down on the ground even when the second crane hook 340 is mounted.
Calculation of the permissible wind speed for lifting a rotor blade is explained hereinafter:
AW=Ap*cW
AW=135 m2·1.1
AW=148.5 m2
[Formula for Calculating the Wind Engagement Area]
[Formula for Calculating the Permissible Wind Speed]
(Maximum Permissible Wind Speed for the Hub of a Rotor Blade)
Calculation of the permissible wind speed for lifting a rotor blade and increasing the mass by using an additional lifting beam with ballast weights of the mounting crane is carried out as follows:
AW=148.5 m2
(Assuming the Wind Engagement Area does not Change Although there is a Distribution Between Auxiliary Winch and Mounting Crane)
(Assuming the Crane has a Lift Capacity of 80 t which is Also Needed to Mount the Pod Components)
(Maximum Permissible Wind Speed for Lifting a Rotor Blade by Using Added Ballast)
The calculation of the permissible wind speed for lifting a rotor blade and increasing the mass by using an additional lifting beam having ballast weights of the mounting crane, and taking account of the distribution of load between an ancillary device and the mounting crane, is effected as follows:
AW1=⅔135 m2·1.1
AW=99 m2
[Assuming that ⅔ of the Area Act on the Crane]
(Area of the Lifting Beam with Additional Ballast)
According to the invention the permissible maximum speed can be considerably increased by means of the lifting beam when mounting the rotor blades. The maximum permissible wind speed can be increased from 4.4 m2 to 7.2 m2 by using the lifting beam with the ballast unit. If the winch unit is used in accordance with an aspect of the present invention the permissible wind speed can be increased to 8.5 m/s. That is particularly advantageous because in that way the rotor blade can be mounted even at relatively high wind speeds.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2016 111 514 | Jun 2016 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/064869 | 6/19/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/220459 | 12/28/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4950012 | Jones | Aug 1990 | A |
7014172 | Kataoka | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7207777 | Bervang | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7708325 | Grant | May 2010 | B2 |
8052396 | Wobben | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8191721 | Hansen | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8840158 | Leibovitz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9533861 | Esteban Fink | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20080307647 | Kessler | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100254813 | Dawson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110042632 | Van Berlo et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130315740 | Westergaard | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140245580 | Meyer | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150300175 | Pfeiffer | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150345465 | Westergaard | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160002010 | May | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100341772 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101565091 | Oct 2009 | CN |
201593181 | Sep 2010 | CN |
102442410 | May 2012 | CN |
105270986 | Jan 2016 | CN |
105492366 | Apr 2016 | CN |
1577254 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1507975 | Mar 2006 | EP |
3034450 | Jun 2016 | EP |
1002758 | Aug 1965 | GB |
2006-152862 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2015-075037 | Apr 2015 | JP |
10-1334339 | Nov 2013 | KR |
10-1358229 | Feb 2014 | KR |
2235054 | Aug 2004 | RU |
84787 | Nov 2008 | UA |
2008155976 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ematec®, “Rotor Blade Traverse”, 2014, extract from the brochure of the company Ematec, Rotorblatttraverse, (with machine translation, 8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190309730 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |