Method for establishing a rate limit on the damper command signal of a vehicle damper

Abstract
A first method of the invention is for establishing a limit on the time rate of change of a damper command signal applied to a damper associated with a wheel of a vehicle, wherein the damper has damping characteristics, wherein a change in the damper command signal changes the damping characteristics, and wherein the damper command signal is derived at least from an algorithm for vehicle body control. The first method includes steps a) through c). Step a) includes identifying a noise indicating signal predictive of noise occurring in the vehicle due to operation of the damper, wherein the noise indicating signal is derived from the algorithm. Step b) includes calculating the noise indicating signal. Step c) includes determining the limit based at least on the calculated noise indicating signal.
Description

SUMMARY OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a first method of the invention;



FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a second method of the invention; and



FIG. 3 is a flow chart of two additional steps applicable to the first method of FIG. 1 and the second method of FIG. 2.


Claims
  • 1. A method for establishing a limit on the time rate of change of a damper command signal applied to a damper associated with a wheel of a vehicle, wherein the damper has damping characteristics, wherein a change in the damper command signal changes the damping characteristics, wherein the damper command signal is derived at least from an algorithm for vehicle body control, and wherein the method comprises the steps of: a) identifying a noise indicating signal predictive of noise occurring in the vehicle due to operation of the damper, wherein the noise indicating signal is derived from the algorithm;b) calculating the noise indicating signal;c) determining the limit based at least on the calculated noise indicating signal;d) limiting the time rate of change of the damper command signal as determined by step c); ande) applying the damper command signal to the damper as limited by step d).
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein steps b) and c) are substantially continuously performed whenever the damper command signal is applied to the damper.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the limit corresponding to a particular value of the noise indicating signal is different when the noise indicating signal is increasing with time than when the noise indicating signal is decreasing with time.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the damper is a magnetorheological damper.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the noise indicating signal is obtained from filtering the absolute value of a difference between an unlimited body demand force derived from the algorithm and a limited body demand force derived from the algorithm, and wherein the filtering passes at least one target noise detection frequency predictive of the noise.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the noise indicating signal is obtained from filtering the absolute value of a ratio whose numerator is a difference between an unlimited body demand force derived from the algorithm and a limited body demand force derived from the algorithm and whose denominator is the unlimited body demand force derived from the algorithm, and wherein the filtering passes at least one target noise detection frequency predictive of the noise.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the noise indicating signal is obtained from filtering the absolute value of the damper command signal, and wherein the filtering passes at least one target noise detection frequency predictive of the noise.
  • 8. A method for establishing a limit on the time rate of change of a damper command signal applied to a damper associated with a wheel of a vehicle, wherein the damper has damping characteristics, wherein a change in the damper command signal changes the damping characteristics, wherein the damper command signal is derived from an algorithm which at least employs a skyhook method for vehicle body control, and wherein the method comprises the steps of: a) deriving from the algorithm an unlimited body demand force and a limited body demand force;b) determining an absolute value of a difference between the unlimited body demand force and the limited body demand force;c) filtering the absolute value of the difference, wherein the filtering passes at least one target noise detection frequency predictive of the noise;d) calculating the filtered absolute value of the difference;e) determining the limit based at least on the calculated filtered absolute value of the difference;f) limiting the time rate of change of the damper command signal as determined by step e); andg) applying the damper command signal to the damper as limited by step f).
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein steps b) through e) are substantially continuously performed whenever the damper command signal is applied to the damper.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein step c) uses a band pass filter to pass the at-least one target noise detection frequency.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein, after using the band pass filter, step c) uses a differential low pass filter, wherein the differential low pass filter uses different coefficients when the band-pass-filtered absolute value of the difference is increasing than when the band-pass-filtered absolute value of the difference is decreasing, and wherein the low pass filter passes frequencies which are lower than the band pass filter.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein step e) uses a two-point look-up table and interpolates between the two points.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the damper is a magnetorheological damper.
  • 14. The method of claim 9, wherein step c) uses a high pass filter to pass the at-least one target noise detection frequency.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein, after using the high pass filter, step c) uses a differential low pass filter, wherein the differential low pass filter uses different coefficients when the high-pass-filtered absolute value of the difference is increasing than when the high-pass-filtered absolute value of the difference is decreasing and wherein the low pass filter passes frequencies which are lower than the high pass filter.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein step e) uses a two-point look-up table and interpolates between the two points.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the damper is a magnetorheological damper.
  • 18. A method for establishing a limit on the time rate of change of a damper command signal applied to a damper associated with a wheel of a vehicle, wherein the damper has damping characteristics, wherein a change in the damper command signal changes the damping characteristics, wherein the damper command signal is derived from an algorithm which at least employs a skyhook method for vehicle body control, and wherein the method comprises the steps of: a) deriving from the algorithm an unlimited body demand force and a limited body demand force;b) determining an absolute value of a ratio whose numerator is a difference between the unlimited body demand force and the limited body demand force and whose denominator is the unlimited body demand force;c) filtering the absolute value of the ratio, wherein the filtering passes at least one target noise detection frequency predictive of the noise;d) calculating the filtered absolute value of the ratio;e) determining the limit based at least on the calculated filtered absolute value of the ratio;f) limiting the time rate of change of the damper command signal as determined by step e); andg) applying the damper command signal to the damper as limited by step f).
  • 19. The method of claim 18, steps b) through e) are substantially continuously performed whenever the damper command signal is applied to the damper.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein step c) uses a band pass filter to pass the at-least one target noise detection frequency.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein, after using the band pass filter, step c) uses a differential low pass filter, wherein the differential low pass filter uses different coefficients when the band-pass-filtered absolute value of the ratio is increasing than when the band-pass-filtered absolute value of the ratio is decreasing, and wherein the low pass filter passes frequencies which are lower than the band pass filter.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein step e) uses a two-point look-up table and interpolates between the two points.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the damper is a magnetorheological damper.
  • 24. A method for establishing a limit on the time rate of change of a damper command signal applied to a damper associated with a wheel of a vehicle, wherein the damper has damping characteristics, wherein a change in the damper command signal changes the damping characteristics, wherein the damper command signal is derived from an algorithm which at least employs a skyhook method for vehicle body control, and wherein the method comprises the steps of: a) deriving from the algorithm a damper command signal;b) determining an absolute value of the damper command signal;c) filtering the absolute value of the damper command signal, wherein the filtering passes at least one target noise detection frequency predictive of the noise;d) calculating the filtered absolute value of the damper command signal;e) determining the limit based at least on the calculated filtered absolute value of the damper command signal;f) limiting the time rate of change of the damper command signal as determined by step e); andg) applying the damper command signal to the damper as limited by step f).
  • 25. The method of claim 24, steps b) through e) are substantially continuously performed whenever the damper command signal is applied to the damper.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein step c) uses a band pass filter to pass the at-least one target noise detection frequency.
  • 27. The method of claim 26, wherein, after using the band pass filter, step c) uses a differential low pass filter, wherein the differential low pass filter uses different coefficients when the band-pass-filtered absolute value of the damper command signal is increasing than when the band-pass-filtered absolute value of the damper command signal is decreasing, and wherein the low pass filter passes frequencies which are lower than the band pass filter.
  • 28. The method of claim 27, wherein step e) uses a two-point look-up table and interpolates between the two points.
  • 29. The method of claim 28, wherein the damper is a magnetorheological damper.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60758811 Jan 2006 US