The technical field of the invention is the characterization of irradiating sources present in an environment, notably in a nuclear installation or an installation comprising irradiating sources.
Gamma cameras are devices that allow an image to be formed allowing a map of irradiating sources in a given environment, and in particular in nuclear installations, to be formed. This type of device was developed in the 1990s, and is increasingly used in nuclear installations for the purposes of radiological characterization. The objective is to identify the main irradiating sources present in an installation. Specifically, irradiating sources are not uniformly distributed. They are often concentrated locally, forming “hotspots” to use the term conventionally used in the field of radioprotection. Gamma cameras are advantageous in that they allow these hotspots to be located at distance.
The development and use of gamma cameras have been abundantly described in the literature. Since the start of the 2000s, spectrometric gamma cameras have been under development. These cameras are based on a pixelated imager, each pixel allowing a spectrum to be obtained from the irradiation that it detects. Irradiating sources may be located far more easily as a result. Specifically, the spectrometric function allows energy bands of interest, corresponding to unscattered photons, i.e. photons that have not been deviated since their emission by the irradiating source, to be selected. The path of unscattered photons is straight. Their selection, in predetermined energy bands, allows noise corresponding to scattered photons to be removed. Since the latter photons have been deviated since their emission, they provide no useful information as to the location of the irradiating sources. Scattering is therefore a noise source that may be significantly limited by spectrometry.
Another advantage of spectrometric gamma cameras is that knowledge of the energy of the photons allows the isotopes responsible for the irradiation to be identified. This is information that is important in the field of radioprotection, or in the management of radioactive waste, or even when dismantling nuclear installations, or performing radiological characterization after an accident.
After an irradiating source has been detected, the question of determining the radiation level that it is generating arises. Radiation level is generally expressed in dose rate, the conventional unit being Gy/h, or equivalent dose rate, the conventional unit being Sv/h. Dose rate corresponds to an amount of energy released per unit volume, whereas equivalent dose rate is a unit used for radioprotection purposes and which quantifies the biological damage caused by the radiation. When the irradiation is caused by the photons, the equivalent dose rate corresponds to the dose rate.
Estimation of the dose rate produced by an irradiating source firstly requires the emission energy of the source to be known. Use of a spectrometric gamma camera allows this information to be obtained.
Moreover, the dose rate produced by an irradiating source varies as a function of the distance to the source. When an irradiating source is point-like, it is known that the irradiation varies as a function of one over the square of the distance. Thus, on the basis of an estimation of the dose rate at a point, located at a known distance from an irradiating source, it is possible to estimate the dose rate produced by the irradiating source at any point in the observation field, provided that the irradiating source may be considered to be point-like. However, when it is sought to estimate irradiation in proximity to the irradiating source, the assumption of point-likeness is no longer necessarily valid.
A difficulty arises when the irradiating sources are areal sources. Specifically, in such situations, it is necessary to take into account the spatial distribution of the irradiating sources. It is possible to generate models using computational codes, but this takes time and remains subject of the validity of the adopted model, and in particular of geometric assumptions as to the extent and uniformity of the irradiating source.
The inventor provides a method allowing a map of the irradiation, in the form of dose rates or equivalent dose rates, of an installation comprising areal irradiating sources that are not necessarily uniform to be generated. By areal source, what is meant is a source that cannot be considered to be point-like.
A first subject of the invention is a method for estimating a dose rate, on the basis of measurements taken by a gamma camera, the gamma camera defining an observation field, the method being such that:
the method comprising the following steps:
By photon flux detected by the gamma camera, what is meant is a photon flux detected by a pixel of the gamma camera. In step f), the estimated dose rate corresponds to the dose rate corresponding to the emission spectrum taken into account in step b).
By dose rate, what is meant is dose rate or equivalent dose rate.
According to one embodiment:
The dose rate estimated in step f) then corresponds to the dose rate generated by the isotope or set of isotopes taken into account.
The method may include any one of the following features, taken alone or in technically feasible combinations:
A second subject of the invention is a measuring device, comprising:
The invention will be better understood on reading the description of the exemplary embodiments, which are described, in the rest of the description, with reference to the figures listed below.
The gamma camera comprises pixels 2j, each pixel corresponding to an elementary spatial region of the observation field. Pixels are shown in
Generally, the pixels 2j are coplanar and distributed in a two-dimensional matrix array, preferably regularly. The matrix array may for example comprise 512×512 pixels, or even more. Each pixel 2j is an elementary radiation detector.
The gamma imager may be a Compton gamma camera, a pinhole-collimator gamma camera or coded-aperture gamma camera. It may also be a question, non-exhaustively, of a gamma camera the collimator of which comprises parallel channels, or convergent channels, or divergent channels. Thus, the term gamma camera corresponds to an imager having an observation field and configured to form an image allowing irradiating sources to be located in the irradiation field. Whatever the type of gamma imager, it allows a gamma image comprising pixels, each pixel corresponding to one elementary spatial region of the observation field, to be formed. The observation field Ω may be discretized at coordinates (x,y) into a mesh. Each pixel may thus be associated with one or more points of the mesh. When a Compton gamma camera is being used, the correspondence between pixels and points of the mesh varies depending on the detected interactions.
Preferably, each pixel 2j performs a spectrometric function, in the sense that it allows the radiation detected, during an acquisition time, to be separated spectrally into various spectral bands, or energy bands. When this type of pixel is used, it is possible to form various gamma images of a given observation field, each image corresponding to one energy band (denoted Ei). The width dEi in each energy band Ei is variable and depends on the performance of the pixels in terms of energy resolution. The width of each energy band may be about 1 keV, or a few keV, or a few tens of keV.
The acquisition time T of a spectrum, by each pixel, depends on the photon flux to which the pixel is exposed. It may be a few tens of ms, or a few seconds, and may last several minutes, or even several hours. The gamma spectrum acquired by each pixel may then comprise intensity peaks corresponding to emission intensities of known isotopes.
It is known that an emission spectrum Sk is associated with each isotope k. Such an emission spectrum corresponds to a histogram of the emission rate as a function of energy. By emission rate, what is meant is an emitted number of photons corresponding to a unit activity of the isotope. Generally, the unit activity is 1 Bq. Thus, the emission spectrum corresponds to a number of photons emitted, in each energy band Ei for the unit activity in question, in the present case 1 Bq.
A gamma image may be established by considering a combination of spectral bands, which correspond to the emission spectrum Sk of an isotope. The combination may be a weighted sum. The image is then representative of a spatial distribution of the activity of the isotope in question.
In the example schematically shown in
With certain gamma imagers, in particular Compton gamma cameras or coded-aperture gamma cameras, the image acquired by the imager does not allow the irradiating sources in the observation field to be viewed directly. The acquired image undergoes processing, taking into account a response function of the camera, so as to allow a gamma image in which the intensity of each pixel corresponds to a flux of detected photons, originating from each point of the mesh, to be obtained in each energy band.
A processing unit 4 receives the spectra acquired by each pixel 2j of the gamma camera 2. The image-processing unit is notably configured to perform the operations described with reference to
The observation field Q is meshed, in such a way as to be discretized into points. Since the observation field is not known a priori, it may be likened to a virtual object surface PO on which each observation point has coordinates (x,y). An important element of the invention is that the points of the object frame of reference are considered to belong to the same object surface PO.
According to a first approach, which is simple to implement, the object surface PO is a planar surface. The angular observation field Ω of the gamma camera, which extends about the optical axis Δ, describes a segment of a sphere S (see
Each pixel of the gamma camera is characterized by a spatial response function and a spectral response function.
A spatial response function Bj(x, y) is established for each pixel 2j. The spatial response function corresponds to a probability that a photon, emitted by a point (x, y) of the observation field, is detected by the pixel 2j. Thus, each pixel 2j has a spatial response function Bj(x,y) established for all or some of the points (x, y) of the observation field Ω. The spatial model may be established analytically or by modelling. The spatial response function may be established for an isotope k, in which case it is denoted Bj,k(x, y). It quantifies a probability that a photon, emitted by an isotope k, at a point (x, y) of the observation field, is detected by the pixel 2j.
The spatial model may also be determined for a preset isotope. In this case, the spatial model takes into account the emission energies and their respective branching ratios. The spatial model then allows a probability of presence of the isotope to be established.
Below, the response matrix is considered to be identical for each pixel, and it is denoted A.
Each row A(Ep,.) of the matrix, such as shown in
The main steps of a method for estimating a dose rate produced by one or more irradiating sources located in the observation field of a gamma camera will now be described with reference to
Step 100: Acquiring a Spectral Image M.
In this step, a spectral image M is acquired, for an acquisition time that is sufficient to allow exploitable spectra to be obtained by the pixels 2j of the camera. The spectral image M is composed of spectra Mj, each spectrum being acquired by one pixel 2j during an acquisition period. Each spectrum Mj comprises photon flux Mi,j, detected in energy bands Ei The flux Mi,j is the number of photons detected by the pixel 2j in an energy band Ei per unit time.
Step 110: Selecting one or more energy bands, forming an emission spectrum Sk. In this step, for various pixels 2j, one or more energy bands are selected. This selection may be made beforehand. This is notably the case when the isotope or isotopes liable to be present in the observation field is/are known beforehand. It is conventional to base the selection on a list containing about ten or a few tens of potentially present gamma-emitting isotopes, the respective emission spectra of which are known. In certain nuclear installations, the list may contain only a few isotopes, considered to be preponderant, or even a single isotope. Below, each isotope is represented by an integer k, comprised between 1 and K·K is the number of potential isotopes. As indicated above, each isotope k is associated with an emission spectrum Sk. The emission spectrum of an isotope comprises emission energies (the latter being discretized) and the branching ratio associated with each energy. The branching ratio corresponds to an emission probability.
According to one alternative, a plurality of isotopes may be selected, and an emission spectrum formed from a combination of the emission spectra of each isotope. The combination is for example a weighted sum. It is thus possible to form an emission spectrum comprising a predefined mixture of isotopes.
According to one possibility, the emission spectrum comprises only a single energy (for example 661.66 keV when 137Cs is of interest), or a plurality of discrete energy bands (for example 1173 keV and 1332 keV when 60Co is of interest).
Step 120: Determining the Flux Detected in Each Energy Band.
In this step, for each pixel 2j, the photon flux Mi,j detected in each energy band Ei selected in step 110 is determined. The flux Mi,j corresponds to the number of photons detected in the energy band Ei per unit time.
Step 130: Modelling the Detected Flux
In this step, a photon flux {circumflex over (M)}i,j that would be detected by each pixel 2j if each isotope k on the object surface PO had an apparent activity Ok(x, y) is modelled. The apparent activity Ok(x,y) corresponds to an activity of the isotope when each point of the observation field is considered to belong to the object surface PO. It will be recalled that the activity of an isotope corresponds to a number of disintegrations per second. Depending on the apparent activity Ok(x, y), the flux {circumflex over (M)}i,j detected by each pixel 2j, in an energy band Ei, is such that:
where:
{circumflex over (M)}i,j is a scalar quantity. It will be noted that expression (1) comprises a sum over each isotope k in question.
The contribution {circumflex over (m)}k,i,j of the isotope k in the energy band Ei within pixel 2j is such that
Step 140: Determining the Apparent Activity
In step 140, in each energy band E1, and for each pixel 2j, the flux Mi,j detected in step 120 is compared with the flux {circumflex over (M)}i,j modelled in step 130. It is a question of finding, for each isotope k in question, the matrix Ok(x, y) that minimizes an error, for example a squared error, between Mi,j and {circumflex over (M)}i,j.
Thus,
According to one preferred embodiment, the minimization may be of Poisson type, such that:
Such a minimization may be achieved using an MLEM algorithm (MLEM standing for Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization), such algorithms being known to those skilled in the art.
At the end of step 140, as many images Ok(x, y) as there are isotopes in question will have been obtained.
When an isotope, 60Co for example, has various emission lines, in various energy bands, the images Ok(x, y) correspond to a spatial distribution of the activity of the isotope, which takes into account the emission spectrum Sk of the isotope.
Step 150: Estimating the Dose Rate
In step 150, the dose rate is estimated for at least one isotope k, or even for each isotope k for which a significant apparent activity Ok (x, y) has been detected at at least one point (x,y) of the mesh.
The dose rate generated by the isotope k on the pixels of the gamma camera is such that:
This may also be written:
The scalar Di is the value, in the energy band Ei, of a conversion function D that converts the photon flux in the dose rate. The conversion function D is established in each energy band Ei in a calibrating step 90 described below.
k is the dose rate, conventionally expressed in Gy/h, or the equivalent dose rate, conventionally expressed in Sv/h, corresponding to the emission spectrum taken into account. The various dose rates k, corresponding to various isotopes k or to various emission spectra Sk, respectively, may be estimated and each of these dose rates summed.
Step 150 allows an estimation of the dose rate produced by all or some of the isotopes k within the observation field to be obtained. This functionality allows a distribution of the various isotopes in the observation field to be evaluated.
Steps 110 to 150 may be carried out for the entire observation field, or for certain points of the observation field. It may for example be a question of points selected by an operator, on the basis of the spectrum image acquired in step 100. It may for example be a question of a particular region of the observation field, comprising a particular irradiating source.
The method may also comprise the following steps.
Step 160: Estimating the Dose Rate Depending on Distance
The gamma camera may be associated with a rangefinder 3, so as to estimate a distance between the gamma camera and various points of the observation field. The rangefinder may be optical or acoustic or electromagnetic. The distance dO corresponds to the distance between the camera and the object surface PO.
It is then possible to estimate, simply, a dose rate at various distances. To this end, the estimation of the apparent activity Ok(x,y), i.e. the activity on the object surface PO, is used as starting point. If x′ and y′ represent the coordinates of a measurement point parallel to the object surface PO and located at a distance d from the object surface, the dose rate, at this point, generated by an isotope k, may be estimated using the expression:
where ck is a factor that allows the distance to be taken into account, this factor being described below.
In the system of the coordinates x′ and y′, any point located on the optical axis of the camera has the coordinates (0, 0).
The factor that allows the distance to be taken into account is obtained via a measurement of the distance dO between the gamma camera and the object surface PO. The following is then obtained:
With k(0, 0, do)=k, k being the dose rate resulting from step 150: see either of expressions (6) and (6′).
It will be understood that the obtainment of an apparent activity Ok(x,y), as a result of step 140, allows a dose rate to be estimated for various points of the observation field at various distances with respect to the object plane. This however assumes knowledge of a distance dO between the gamma camera and the object surface, so as to be able to compute the factor ck that allows the distance to be taken into account.
In the embodiment described above, the object surface is considered to be a planar surface. Considering the irradiating sources to be distributed over such a surface makes it possible to avoid the need for a three-dimensional reconstruction of each irradiating source. It is therefore a simplifying assumption, avoiding the need for complex computing means. According to one variant, a measurement of a distance between the camera and a plurality of points of the observation field is available. This measurement may be obtained by a range finding sensor, a LIDAR sensor for example, performing a scan along the observation field. In this case, the object surface is then a non-planar surface. It is defined depending on the distance between the camera and the various points, of the mesh, for which a distance to the camera was determined.
The method described above assumes a prior calibration, so as to determine the conversion coefficient Di in a plurality of energy bands. This is the subject of step 90.
Step 90: Determining the Dose Rate-Photon Flux Conversion Function
The dose rate, at the energy E, is obtained using a conversion function that is obtained empirically:
The conversion function D(E) allows a conversion to be performed between a dose rate and a photon flux detected, at the energy E, by a pixel of the gamma camera.
The parameters β, α and E0 may be determined by simulation.
Since the parameters β, α and E0 are known, expression (9) allows a conversion function to be obtained for various energies.
The parameters of the conversion function D(E) may also be determined experimentally. This step is carried out by exposing the gamma camera to a calibration source, which generates a known emission spectrum. The irradiating source may for example be monoenergetic, though this condition is not absolutely necessary. The dose rate Di generated, at the camera, by the source, in an energy band Ei, is well characterized.
It is possible to show that the dose rate to which each pixel of the gamma camera is exposed is:
where T is the acquisition time and S(E) is the spectrum acquired by a pixel during the acquisition time. θ is the set of parameters of the conversion function i.e. β, α and E0.
During the calibration, a number Q of acquisitions of spectra Sq(E) are carried out using one or more pixels of the gamma camera. During each acquisition, the camera is exposed to a dose rate q which is known because the calibration source is known and the distance between the calibration source and the gamma camera is also known. Thus, for each acquisition, it is possible to write:
where Tq is the acquisition time of each spectrum and Dθ,q(E) is the conversion function given by expression (9) during each acquisition.
The parameters θ of the conversion function may be estimated by minimizing the discrepancy between Dq and each integral
the latter being parameterized by the set of parameters θ. Thus, an error is minimized, between the dose rate to which the camera is actually exposed, and the estimation of this dose rate using the conversion function according to expression (9).
Thus
{circumflex over (θ)} is the estimation of the optimal parameters of the conversion function.
In expressions (6) and (6′), the coefficient Di is such that:
Di=D{circumflex over (θ)}(Ei) (13)
{circumflex over (θ)} corresponds to the parameters of the conversion function, which are estimated either by modelling or by experimental calibration.
Trials have been carried out using a gamma camera comprising CdZnTe pixels and using two point 57Co sources.
On the basis of the measurement shown in
The invention is applicable to various nuclear installations, or, more generally, to operations of seeking for and characterizing radioactive sources.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
19 13570 | Nov 2019 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20100232568 | Heismann | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120175509 | Blevis | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3 467 548 | Apr 2019 | EP |
WO 2013186239 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chen et al., “A New Compact Gamma Camera with Super Resolution Capability and High Sensitivity for Monitoring Sparse Radioactive Sources in Large Area”, IEEE, 2013, 4 pages. |
Redus et al., “An Imaging Nuclear Survey System”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 43, No. 3, Jun. 1996, pp. 1827-1831. |
Li et al., “An accurate and ultrafast method for estimating three-dimensional radiological dose rate fields from arbitrary atmospheric radionuclide distributions”, Atmospheric Environment 199, 2019, pp. 143-154. |
Zhang et al., “Comparisons between a new point kernel-based scheme and the infinite plane source assumption method for radiation calculation of deposited airborne radionuclides from nuclear power plants”, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 184-185, 2018, pp. 32-45. |
Tojo, “A method of Exposure-Dose-Rate Measurement with Nal(TI) Crystal”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 205, 1983, pp. 517-524. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210165112 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |