The present invention relates to a method for estimating the crank angle at which 50% of the fuel mass has been burnt in a cylinder of an internal combustion engine with spontaneous mixture ignition.
In internal combustion engines with controlled mixture ignition (i.e. in internal combustion engines operating according to the “Otto” cycle and fed with gasoline, methane, LPG or the like) it has been known for many years to use as control magnitude the MFB50 (50% Mass Fraction Burnt) combustion index which represents the crank angle at which 50% of the fuel mass has been burnt inside a cylinder. Indeed, in an internal combustion engine with controlled mixture ignition, the starting instant of combustion (i.e. the sparking instant of the ignition spark) is certainly and accurately known and is chosen beforehand by the engine control strategy by means of the spark advance control.
Instead, in internal combustion engines with spontaneous mixture ignition (i.e. in internal combustion engines operating according to the “Diesel” cycle and fed with oil or similar) the MFB50 combustion index is not used as control magnitude due to the considerable difficulties in estimating such MFB50 combustion index efficiently (i.e. with sufficient accuracy), effectively (i.e. rapidly and without employing excessive calculation power) and cost-effectively (i.e. without requiring the installation of additional components with respect to those normally present).
Currently, pressure sensors capable of directly measuring the pressure inside the cylinders are used to determine the MFB50 combustion index; however, such pressure sensors are very expensive and present a limited reliability in time and are thus only suitable for laboratory tests and not for an extensive use on standard production cars.
It is the object of the present invention to provide a method for effectively, efficiently and cost-effectively estimating the crank angle at which 50% of the fuel mass has been burnt in a cylinder of an internal combustion engine with spontaneous mixture ignition.
According to the present invention, there is provided a method for estimating the crank angle at which 50% of the fuel mass has been burnt in a cylinder of an internal combustion engine with spontaneous mixture ignition as claimed in the attached claims.
The present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings which illustrate a non-limitative embodiment thereof, in which:
In
A phonic wheel 5 provided with a number N (e.g. 60) of teeth 6 is keyed onto the drive shaft 4 and is coupled to a sensor 7, which is adapted to detect the time elapsed between the passage of two consecutive teeth 6. The teeth 6 of the phonic wheel 5 are equally spaced out except for one pair of teeth 6 which are reciprocally arranged at a greater distance than the others to constitute a singularity which allows to accurately identify each tooth 6 and thus the angular position of the phonic wheel 5 (i.e. of the drive shaft 4). The engine 1 further comprises a control unit 8 which is connected to the sensor 7 and is adapted to estimate, for each cylinder 2, the corresponding MFB50 (50% Mass Fraction Burnt) combustion index which represents the crank angle at which 50% of the fuel mass has been burnt inside the cylinder 2.
With reference to
As previously mentioned, the phonic wheel 5 is provided with a number N (e.g. 60) of teeth 6, which are equally spaced out except for one pair of teeth 6 which are reciprocally arranged at a greater distance than the others to constitute a singularity which accurately allows to identify each tooth 6; in this manner, each tooth 6 is identified by a characteristic sequential number i included between 1 and N.
The sensor 7 detects the number i of the current tooth 6 (ith tooth), the time Ti of the current tooth 6, i.e. the interval of time elapsing between the detections of the two angular events which characterize the current tooth 6, the raw angular speed ωraw,i of the current tooth 6, and the drive angle α (i.e. the angular position of the drive shaft 4 which is comprised between 0 and 4π radians). The raw angular speed ωraw,i of the ith tooth 6 is supplied by the following equation:
ωi,raw=Δαi/Ti
The magnitudes detected by sensor 7 and listed above are transmitted to a compensation block 9, which corrects each raw angular speed ωraw,i to compensate for the errors deriving from the inevitable manufacturing tolerances of the teeth 6. In principle, all teeth 6 have the same angular amplitude, but actually due to the inevitable manufacturing tolerances each tooth 6 presents a characteristic shape error, i.e. presents a characteristic angular amplitude more or less different from the theoretical angular amplitude; consequently, the angular speeds ωraw,i are afflicted by an intense noise which makes their use without an appropriate compensation practically impossible. In order to compensate for the shape errors of teeth 6, there is stored a vector (δμ1, δμ2, . . . , δμi, . . . , δμN) composed of N compensation values δμi, each of which is associated to a corresponding ith tooth 6 and represents the difference between the actual angular amplitude of the ith tooth 6 and the theoretic amplitude of the ith tooth 6.
The corresponding compensated angular speed ωi is calculated for each tooth 6 in the compensation block 9 by using the following equation:
ωi=(Δαi+δμi)/Ti
The calibration mode used to determine the compensation values δμi of the teeth 6 is described below. The calibration mode contemplates calculating the raw angular speed ωraw,i of the ith tooth 6 by using the above-described equation and calculating the average angular speed ωav,i per revolution of the ith tooth 6 by means of a moving average filter on N values of the raw angular speeds ωraw,i sequence; it is important to observe that the moving average filter on N values of the raw angular speeds ωraw,i sequence introduces a phase delay equal to N/2 tooth intervals to the average angular speeds ωav,i. Subsequently, the delayed speed error Δωi-N/2 is calculated for the ith tooth 6 by using the following equation:
Δωi-N/2=Cωav,i−ωraw,i-N/2
The raw angular speeds ωraw,i sequence is intentionally delayed by a phase delay equal to N/2 tooth intervals to equal the phase delay introduced by the moving average filter.
Subsequently, the delayed angular error δαi-N/2 for the ith tooth 6 is determined by using the following equation:
δαi-N/2=Δωi-N/2*Ti-N/2
Finally, the delayed angular errors vector δαi-N/2 may be used either to determine (in the case of first absolute calibration operation) or to update the compensation values vector δμi. According to a preferred embodiment, before actually using a delayed angular errors vector δαi-N/2, it is checked that each delayed angular error δαi-N/2 of the vector itself is lower as absolute value than an acceptability threshold which indicates the maximum possible tolerance to the shape of the teeth 6; only if each delayed angular error δαi-N/2 of the vector is lower as absolute value than the acceptability threshold may the delayed angular errors vector δαi-N/2 actually be used. If a compensation value vector δμi is updated, it is preferably used a weighed average between the previous compensation values δμi and the corresponding delayed angular errors δαi-N/2 which normally assigns a higher weight to the previous compensation values δμi (e.g. higher the value as higher is the confidence in the previous compensation values δμi). For example, the following equation could be used:
δμi,j=K*(δαi−δμi,j-1)+δμi,j-1
Preferably, the above-described calibration operation for determining/updating the compensation values vector δμi is performed only in presence of certain circumstances, e.g. when the internal combustion engine 1 is in cut-off phase and the revolution speed of the drive shaft 4 is included in a certain calibration range so that the reciprocating, indicated inertial torques approximately are balanced with the internal combustion engine 1 in cut-off phase.
The compensated angular speeds ωi calculated by the compensation block 9 are supplied to an analysis block 10, in which a frequency analysis of the known type is performed on the compensated angular speeds ωi to determine at least one speed signal harmonic Ωn. The harmonic generic Ωn of the nth speed signal is always a complex number, characterized by its own module |Ωn| and its own phase Arg(Ωn).
The harmonics Ωn of the speed signal calculated by the analysis block 10 are supplied to a calculation block 11, in which there is implemented an algorithm based on an inverse mechanical model of the transmission which is symbolically indicated by the equation H(j{acute over (ω)})=T/Ω and represents, in the {acute over (ω)} frequency domain, the relation between the Fourier transforms of the angular speed Ω and of the torque T of the internal combustion engine 1. The function H(j{acute over (ω)}) is a complex value function and allows to obtain the nth torque harmonic Tn by means of the equation:
Tn=H(jΩn)*Ωn
As the speed signal harmonic Ωn, the torque harmonic Tn is a complex number characterized by its own module |Tn| and by its own phase Arg(Tn). It is important to observe that in order to be able to obtain precise estimations, the inverse mechanical model of the transmission must consider the inertial torques caused by the masses in reciprocating motion (e.g. the masses of the pistons 3).
The module |Tn| of the torque harmonics Tn calculated by the calculation block 11 is supplied to a calculation block 12, in which there is implemented an algebraic function Γ which puts the average indicated torque Tind into relation with the module |Tn| of the nth torque harmonic Tn according to the following equation:
Tind=Γ(|Tn|,P)
Normally, the engineering parameters P of the internal combustion engine 1 comprise the revolution speed of the drive shaft 4 and the intake pressure (i.e. the pressure present inside an intake pipe).
The phase Arg(Tn) of the torque harmonics Tn calculated by the calculation block 11 is supplied to a calculation block 13, in which there is implemented an algebraic function Ψ which puts the MFB50 combustion index into relation with the phase Arg(Tn) of the nth torque harmonic Tn according to the following equation:
MFB50=Ψ(Arg(Tn),P
By way of non-binding example, the equations of the direct mechanical model of the transmission in the frequency domain may be the following:
Torque Engine Side
Inertial Torque
Cylinder Torque
Tind,n=Te,n−Talt,n
The inverse mechanical model of the transmission (previously symbolically indicated by the equation H(j{acute over (ω)})=T/Ω) is obtained from the three equations of the direct mechanical model of the transmission shown above by replacing the first and the second equation in the third equation and so as to put the average indicated torque Tind,n into relation with the angular speed ωe,n of the drive shaft 4; the relation between the average indicated torque Tind,n and the angular speed ωe,n of the drive shaft 4 supplies the inverse mechanical model of the transmission (the final formula of the inverse mechanical model of the transmission is not shown because it does not add information and is complex to annotate). It is important to observe that in practice an experimental methodology is performed to experimentally obtain by points the transfer function of the inverse mechanical model of the transmission.
By way of non-binding example, the algebraic function Ψ which puts the combustion index MFB50 into relation with the phase Arg(Tn) of the harmonic Tn of the nth torque could be as follows:
MFB50=c0+c1Φ+c2Φ2+c3PΦ+c4P2Φ
The values of the coefficients ci may be obtained experimentally by minimising the mean square error between a series of measured values of the combustion index MFB50 and a corresponding series of estimated values of the combustion index MFB50.
By way of non-binding example, the algebraic function Γ which puts the average indicated torque Tind into relation with the module |Tn| of the harmonic Tn of the nth torque could be as follows:
Tind=b0+b1|Tn|+b2P+b3N
The values of the coefficients bi may be obtained experimentally by minimising the mean square error between a series of measured values of the average indicated torque Tind and a corresponding series of estimated values of the average indicated torque Tind.
The above-described estimation mode of the combustion index MFB50 in each cylinder 2 presents many advantages, because it is efficient (i.e. it allows to estimate the combustion index MFB50 with a considerable accuracy), effective (i.e. it allows to estimate the combustion index MFB50 rapidly and without employing excessive calculation power), and cost-effective (i.e. it does not require the installation of additional components with respect to those normally present in a modern internal combustion engine operating according to the “Diesel” cycle).
In virtue of the possibility of estimating the combustion index MFB50 in each cylinder 2, it is possible to feedback control the combustion process in virtue of which it is possible to reduce the fuel consumption and the polluting emissions, the performances being equal. For example, the combustion index MFB50 in each cylinder 2 may be advantageously used to govern the force on the connecting rods and knock phenomena.
Furthermore, the above-described estimation mode of the combustion index MFB50 in each cylinder 2 allows to obtain the average indicated torque Tind produced by each cylinder 2 which may be effectively used to further improve the combustion process control.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07425457 | Jul 2007 | EP | regional |
This application claims priority under 35 USC 121 as a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/177,922 filed on Jul. 23, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4481469 | Hauler et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
5789658 | Henn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5977765 | Gibson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6142026 | Ohashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
7006913 | Sgatti et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7114380 | Fehrenbach et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7814780 | Bowling et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20030037607 | Minich et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050120784 | Fehrenbach et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20080110283 | Shaver et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080245142 | Bowling et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100263439 | Bowling et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110029267 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12177922 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 12897968 | US |