The present invention relates to a method for accurately estimating the vulcanization degree of a rubber compound, in particular, a change curve of the vulcanization degree of the rubber compound with vulcanizing time.
when manufacturing a rubber product such as vehicle tire, it is important to estimate a change in the vulcanization degree of a rubber compound from moment to moment in order to determine and control the vulcanizing temperature and vulcanizing time.
In the following non-patent document 1, it is disclosed that, the following expression (3) is integrated so that the expression (3) is approximated to an actual vulcanization curve which shows the vulcanization degree or torque of a rubber compound against the vulcanizing time, and by the use of such approximated expression (3), the vulcanization degree X is estimated.
wherein
X: vulcanization degree
t: vulcanizing time
K1, K2, m, n: invariables.
In the non-patent document 1, in order to enable the integration of the expression (3), fixed real numbers are assigned to the invariables m, n and K1, and
only the value of the invariable K2 is determined so that the expression (3) becomes close to the actual vulcanization curve as far as possible. Therefore, the method disclosed in the non-patent document 1 has its limit, and the vulcanization degree of the rubber compound can not be accurately estimated.
In order to make an accurate estimation, it is conceivable to determine the values of the invariables m, n, K1 and K2 in the expression (3) so that the obtained expression becomes more close to the actual vulcanization curve.
In this case however, it is complex and difficult to determine the values suitable for the invariables m, n, K1 and K2, and it is not assured that suitable values can be found.
It is therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a method for accurately estimating the vulcanization degree of a rubber compound.
According to the present invention, a method for estimating the vulcanization degree of a rubber compound, comprises
a measuring process in which a measured vulcanization curve which is a change curve of the vulcanization degree of the rubber compound with vulcanizing time is obtained by actually measuring the shearing resistance (or torque) of the rubber compound during vulcanization,
an invariable determining process in which values of the invariables K1, K2 and m of the following expression (1) are determined which values minimize the error between the measured vulcanization curve and an estimated vulcanization curve which is a curve of the expression (1),
wherein
X: vulcanization degree
t: vulcanizing time
wherein
the invariable determining process comprises
an invariable calculating process in which each of different real numbers is assigned to the invariable K1 of the expression (1), and
the expression (1) is approximated to the measured vulcanization curve, and then
from the approximated expression, a set of values of the invariables K1, K2 and m are obtained,
whereby plural sets of the values corresponding to the respective real numbers are obtained, and
a fitted curve determining process in which
a plurality of the estimated vulcanization curves are obtained by assigning the plural sets of the values to the expression (1), and
from a plurality of the estimated vulcanization curves, an estimated vulcanization curve whose error from the measured vulcanization curve is smallest, is found out.
The above and further objects and novel features of the present invention will more fully appear from the following detailed description when the same is read in connection with the accompanying drawing.
a) is a graph of the invariable K1 and vulcanizing temperature.
b) is a graph of the invariable K2 and vulcanizing temperature.
c) is a graph of the invariable m and vulcanizing temperature.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail in conjunction with accompanying drawings.
The method for estimating the vulcanization degree of a rubber compound according to the present invention can be suitably used for rubber compounds constituting a rubber product such as vehicle tire.
In the measuring process S1, the shearing resistance or torque of the rubber compound during vulcanization is actually measured to obtain the vulcanization curve (hereinafter the measured vulcanization curve or actual vulcanization curve). Incidentally, the vulcanization curve shows the vulcanization degree X of the rubber compound as a function of the vulcanizing time t.
In this embodiment, in order to measure the torque T of the rubber compound, a so called Curelastometer, a rubber testing machinery for assessing vulcanization characteristics, is employed.
As shown in
The measuring conditions are as follows.
Form the measured torque T, the vulcanization degree X of the rubber compound is calculated by the use of the following expression (4).
wherein
Tmax: torque of rubber compound after vulcanization
Tmin: torque of rubber compound before vulcanization
The vulcanization degree X indicates the degree (from 0 to 1) of completion of the vulcanization. When the torque T is minimum (Tmin), the vulcanization degree X=0. When the torque T is maximum (Tmax), the vulcanization degree X=1.
For each of the vulcanizing temperatures, the vulcanization degree X of the rubber compound is plotted against the vulcanizing time t to obtain the measured vulcanization curve 2 as shown in
In the process S2, the following expression (1) is used.
wherein
X: vulcanization degree
t: vulcanizing time
K1, K2, m: invariables.
The expression (1) is obtained from the expression (3) explained in the non-patent document 1. 1 (one) is assigned to the invariable n of the expression (3), and the expression (3) is converted to natural logarithm, and then the converted expression is transformed to the expression (1).
In the invariable determining process S2, values of the invariables K1, K2 and m of the expression (1) are determined which values can minimize the error between the measured vulcanization curve 2 and the estimated vulcanization curve 3 which is the curve of the expression (1).
For each of the vulcanizing temperatures, in this example, 150, 160, 170 and 180 degrees C., at which the measured vulcanization curves 2 were obtained, the following are performed:
a plurality of different real numbers are assigned to the invariable K1 of the expression (1), and
for each of the different real numbers for K1,
values of the invariables K2 and m are determined.
A flowchart of this invariable calculating process S21 is shown in
First, the lower limit of the real number or the smallest real number is assigned to the invariable K1 of the expression (1). For example, the lower limit of the real number is 1×10−10.
Therefore, the expression (1) can be transformed into a linear expression whose gradient and intercept are equal to m and K2, respectively.
Next, the linear expression transformed from the expression (1) is approximated to the measured vulcanization curve 2 at the vulcanizing temperatures concerned (for example 150 degrees C.).
For example, the method of least squares is used to approximate the linear expression 4 to the measured vulcanization curve 2 as shown in
Next, from the linear expression 4 approximated to the measured vulcanization curve 2 in the process S212, the values of the invariables K1, K2 and m thereof are obtained.
The invariable K2 and invariable m can be obtained as the gradient and intercept of the approximated linear expression 4. Thus, in this process 213, a set of values of the invariables K1, K2 and m, corresponding to the above-mentioned real number assigned to the invariable K1 in the process S211, can be obtained.
Next, it is judged if the current value of the invariable K1 is equal to or more than its upper limit.
Here, the upper limit is 1. Thus, the real numbers assigned to the invariable K1 are more than 0 and less than 1.
If “yes”, then the procedure goes to process S216.
If “no” namely the current value of the invariable K1 is less than the upper limit, then the procedure goes to process S215.
In the process S215, the invariable K1 is increased to a value equal to the current value multiplied by a predetermined incremental modulus L. In this embodiment, the incremental modulus L is 1.1.
Then, the processes S212 to S214 are repeated.
Thus, by the processes S211-S215, with respect to the concerned vulcanizing temperature, a set of values of the invariables K1, K2 and m are obtained for each of the real numbers from the lower limit to the upper limit assigned to K1. In other words, plural sets of values of K1, K2 and m corresponding to the respectively real numbers are obtained with respect to the concerned vulcanizing temperature.
In
By limiting the real numbers assigned to the invariable K1 in a range of more than 0 and less than 1, the linear expression 4 transformed from the expression (1) can be well approximated to the measured vulcanization curve 2. If the real number is more than 1, the degree of the approximation is not increased, and the computational cost is increased.
In the process S216, it is judged if the above-mentioned plural sets of values of the invariables K1, K2 and m have been obtained with respect to every vulcanizing temperature, in this example, 150, 160, 170 and 180 degrees C.
If “yes”, then the procedure goes to a fitted curve determining process S22.
If “no”, namely, there exists a vulcanizing temperature about which the plural sets of values of the invariables K1, K2 and m are not yet obtained, then with respect to that vulcanizing temperature, the processes S211 to S216 are repeated.
Therefore, in the invariable calculating process S21, as shown in
After the invariable calculating process S21,
the fitted curve determining process S22 is performed
with respect to every vulcanizing temperature.
The process S221 is performed with respect to one of the vulcanizing temperatures.
In this process S221, with respect to each of the plural sets of values of the invariables K1, K2 and m,
by assigning the values of K1, K2 and m to the expression (1), an estimated vulcanization curve 3 of the expression (1) is obtained. Therefore, a plurality of the estimated vulcanization curves 3 are obtained as shown in
In
The process S222 is performed with respect to the vulcanizing temperature concerned.
In this process S222, from a plurality of the estimated vulcanization curves 3, an estimated vulcanization curve 3 whose error from the measured vulcanization curve 2 is smallest, namely, most fitted curve 3s is determined or found out.
The error between the estimated vulcanization curve 3 and the measured vulcanization curve 2 can be obtained by summing up the difference x1(t)-x2(t) between
the vulcanization degree X1(t) of the estimated vulcanization curve 3 at the vulcanizing time t and
the vulcanization degree X2(t) of the measured vulcanization curve 2 at the vulcanizing time t
from the vulcanizing time t when the vulcanization degree X of the measured vulcanization curve 2 is 0 to the vulcanizing time t when the vulcanization degree X of the measured vulcanization curve 2 is 1.
*** process S223
In the process S223, it is judged if the most fitted curve 3s has been determined with respect to every vulcanizing temperature for example, 150, 160, 170 and 180 degrees C.
If “yes”, then the process S23 goes to process S23.
If “no” namely there exists a vulcanizing temperature about which the most fitted curve 3s is not yet determined, then with respect to that vulcanizing temperature, the process S221 to s222 are repeated.
Therefore, in the fitted curve determining process S22, the most fitted curves 3s are obtained with respect to all of the vulcanizing temperatures as shown in
In the process S23, firstly, the values of invariable K1 of the most fitted curves 3s and their vulcanizing temperatures are plotted as shown in
Then, an approximate straight line to the plot points is determined, and the linear expression of such line, namely, approximate expression K1(s) is obtained.
Thus, by using the approximate expression K1(s), it is possible to obtain the value of the invariable K1 at any vulcanizing temperature s.
For example, the approximate expression is
K1(s)=−2.17×10−4+1.67×10−6×s.
In the process S24, firstly, the values of invariable K2 of the most fitted curves 3s and their vulcanizing temperatures are plotted as shown in
Then, an approximate straight line to the plot points is determined, and the linear expression of such line, namely, approximate expression K2(s) is obtained.
Thus, by using the approximate expression K2(s), it is possible to obtain the value of the invariable K2 at any vulcanizing temperature s.
For example, the approximate expression is
K2(s)=−2.17×10−4+2.24×10−3×s.
In the process S25, firstly, the values of invariable m of the most fitted curves 3s and their vulcanizing temperatures are plotted as shown in
Then, an approximate straight line to the plot points is determined, and the linear expression of such line, namely, approximate expression m(s) is obtained.
Thus, by using the approximate expression m(s), it is possible to obtain the value of the invariable m at any vulcanizing temperature s.
For example, the approximate expression is
m(s)=4.14×10−1+3.01×10−3×s.
Accordingly, by using the approximate expressions K1(s), K2(s) and m(s), the values of the invariables K1, K2 and m can be determined with respect to any vulcanizing temperature s.
Therefore, by assigning the determined values of the invariables K1, K2 and m to the expression (1),
the most fitted curve 3s (estimated vulcanization curve 3) at any vulcanizing temperature s can be defined easily in a short time in order to accurately estimate the vulcanization degree of the rubber compound.
In the estimating process S3 in this embodiment, with respect to such change curve 7, the change in the vulcanization degree X(t) of the rubber compound with the vulcanizing time t is estimated.
In the process S31, first, the vulcanizing temperature s corresponding to a certain point in the vulcanizing time t is obtained from the change curve 7 as shown in
Initially, starting time t1 (=0) is used as a certain point in the vulcanizing time t.
Then, the obtained vulcanizing temperature s is assigned to the above-mentioned approximate expressions K1(t), K2(t) and m(t), and the values of the invariables K1, K2 and m are obtained therefrom.
In the process S32, the obtained values of the invariables K1, K2 and m are assigned to the expression (1), and the gradient (dx/dt) of the vulcanization degree at the certain point in the vulcanizing time t is obtained.
In the process S33, the obtained gradient (dx/dt) is assigned to the following expression (2)
Thereby, the vulcanization degree X(t+1) at the incremented vulcanizing time t+1 is calculated.
In the process S34, it is judged if the vulcanization degree X(t) has been calculated throughout the entire range of the vulcanizing time t.
If “yes” namely the vulcanizing time t has reached to the termination time of the vulcanization, then the procedure goes to process S36.
If “no” namely the vulcanizing time t is less than the termination time of the vulcanization, then the procedure goes to process S35.
In the process S35, the vulcanizing time t is incremented.
Then, the process S31 to s34 are repeated.
Thus, in the estimating process S3, from the beginning to the end of the vulcanization shown in
In the process S36, as shown in
Next, in the process S37, it is judged if the change in the vulcanization degree X(t) with the vulcanizing time is desirable.
If “yes”, then the procedure goes to process S38.
If “no”, then the procedure goes to process S39.
In the process S38, the rubber product is manufactured by vulcanizing a rubber compound according to the change curve 7 as shown in
In the process S39, the change curve 7 is modified.
Then, the process S31 to S37 are again performed.
In the case of a pneumatic tire including plural kinds of rubber members, e.g. tread rubber, sidewall rubber and the like, it is desirable that the time t required for the vulcanization degree X(t) of each rubber member becoming within a range of from 0.8 to 1.0 is not widely varied among the rubber members, in other words, the times t are within a specific range. In order to examine this, the above described method in this embodiment can be suitably used.
For example, the vulcanizing time of a tire is determined by the longest one of the times required for the vulcanization degree X(t) of the rubber members becoming 0.8. In order to find an optimal condition which can reduce the vulcanizing time, the above described method in this embodiment can be suitably used.
According to the procedure shown in
For each of the vulcanizing temperatures, the values of invariables K1, K2 and m, which minimize the error between the measured vulcanization curve and the estimated vulcanization curve defined by of the expression (1), were obtained.
Then, the error (maximum) between the vulcanization degree X(t) of the estimated vulcanization curve obtained by assigning the values of invariables K1, K2 and m and
the vulcanization degree X(t) of the measured vulcanization curve was calculated, The results are as follows.
Error at 150 degrees C.: 0.08
Error at 160 degrees C.: 0.08
Error at 170 degrees c: 0.08
Error at 180 degrees C.: 0.08
If the error is less than 0.1 at any point in the vulcanizing time t, the estimated vulcanization curve is considered as being good.
In the embodiment 1, therefore, accurate estimated vulcanization curves could be obtained. In other words, the vulcanization degree of the rubber compound at any point in the vulcanizing time t could be accurately estimated.
while vulcanizing the rubber compound according to the change curve 7 shown in
the change in the vulcanization degree with the vulcanizing time was obtained.
According to the procedure shown in
The vulcanizing temperatures were same as those in the embodiment 1. The plural sets of the values for the invariables K1, K2 and m obtained in the embodiment 1 were used.
Then, the error (maximum) between the estimated vulcanization curve 5 and the measured change in the vulcanization degree with the vulcanizing time was calculated.
As a result, the maximum error was 0.07.
If the error is less than 0.1 at any point in the vulcanizing time t, the estimated vulcanization curve is considered as being good.
Therefore, the vulcanization degree of the rubber compound at any point in the vulcanizing time t could be accurately estimated.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2012-267532 | Dec 2012 | JP | national |