METHOD FOR EVALUATING AN IMMUNOREPERTOIRE

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20160034637
  • Publication Number
    20160034637
  • Date Filed
    February 11, 2014
    12 years ago
  • Date Published
    February 04, 2016
    10 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed is a method for amplifying RNA from T and B-cell populations and using the amplified RNA products to evaluate the possible correlation between a normal or abnormal immune response and the development of a disease such as an autoimmune disease, cancer, diabetes, or heart disease.
Description
SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Feb. 5, 2014, is named 15892-0005_SL.txt and is 93,776 bytes in size.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to methods for identifying T-cell receptor antibody in a population of cells and methods for using that information to measure immune status of a patient and predict the likelihood of which disease the patient might have.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Scientists have known for a number of years that certain discos associated with particular genes or genetic mutations. Genetic causation, however, accounts for only a portion the diseases diagnosed in humans. Many diseases appear to be linked in some way to the immune system's response to infectious and environmental agents, but bow the immune system plays a role in diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer's, costochondritis, fibromyalgia, lupus, and other diseases is still being determined.


The human genome comprises a total number of 567-588 IG (immunoglobulin) and TR (T cell receptor) genes (339-354 IG and 228-234 TR) per haploid genome, localized in the 7 major loci. They comprise 405-418 V, 32 D, 105-109 J and 25-29 C genes. The number of functional IG and TR genes is 321-353 per haploid genome. They comprise 187-215 V, 28 D, 86-88 J and 20-21 C genes (http://imgt.cines.fr). Through rearrangement of these genes, an estimated 2.5×102 possible antibodies or T cell receptors can be generated.


A few diseases to date have been associated with the body's reaction to a common antigen (Prinz, J. et al., Eur. J. Immunol. (1999) 29(10): 3360-3368, “Selection of Conserved TCR VDJ Rearrangements in Chronic Psoriatic Plaques Indicates a Common Antigen in Psoriasis Vulgaris) and/or to specific VDJ rearrangements (Tamaru, J. et al., Blood (1994) 84(3): 708-715. “Hodgkin's Disease with a B-cell Phenotype Often Shows a VDJ Rearrangement and Somatic Mutations in the VH Genes). What is needed is a better method for evaluating changes in human immune response cells and associating those changes with specific diseases.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a method for evaluating changes in immune response populations and associating those changes with a specific disease. In one aspect of the invention, the method composes the steps of (a) isolating a subpopulation of white blood cells from at least one human or animal subject, (b) isolating RNA from the subpopulation of cells, (c) amplifying the RNA using RT-PCR in a first amplification reaction to produce amplicons using nested primers, at least a portion of the nested primers comprising additional nucleotides to incorporate into a resulting amplicon a binding site for a communal primer, (d) separating the amplicons from the first amplification reaction from one or more unused primers from the first amplification reaction, (e) amplifying, by the addition of communal primers in a second amplification reaction, the amplicons of the first amplification reaction having at least one binding site for a communal primer, and (f) sequencing the amplicons of the second amplification reaction to identify antibody and,or receptor rearrangements in the subpopulation of cells. In one embodiment, the subpopulation may comprise a whole blood population or another mixed population sample.


In one embodiment, the step of isolating a subpopulation of white blood cells may be performed by flow cytometry to separate naïve B cells, mature B cells, memory B cells, naïve T cells, mature T cells, and memory T cells. In various embodiments of the method, the recombinations in the subpopulation of cells are rearrangements of B-cell immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH), kappa and/or lambda light chains (IgK, IgL) T-cell receptor Alpha Beta, Gamma, Delta. In an additional embodiment.


In another aspect of the invention, the method may optionally comprise an additional step comprising (g) comparing the rearrangements identified for a population of individuals to whom a vaccine has been administered with the rearrangements identified for a population of individuals to whom the vaccine was not administered to evaluate the efficacy of the vaccine in producing an immune response.


The method may also optionally comprise the additional step of (g) comparing the rearrangements identified for a population of normal individuals with the rearrangements identified for a population of individuals who have been diagnosed with a disease to determine if there is a correlation between a specific rearrangement or set of rearrangements and the disease.


In various aspects, the method can produce semi-quantitative amplification of polynucleotides comprising complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3s), which result from genetic rearrangements within T or B cells and are responsible for the affinity and specificity of antibodies and/or T cell receptors for specific antigens. Semi-quantitative amplification provides a method to not only detect the presence of specific CDR3 sequences, but also determine the relative abundance of cells which have produced the necessary recombination events to produce those CDR3 sequences.


One aspect of the invention therefore relates to a method for analyzing semi-quantitative sequence information to provide one or more immune status reports for a human or animal. The method for producing an immune status report comprising the steps of (a) identifying one or more distinct CDR3 sequences that are shared between a subject's immunoprofile and a cumulative immunoprofile from a disease library stored in a database, summing a total number of a subjects detected sequences corresponding to those shared distinct CDR3 sequences, and computing the percentage of the total number of detected sequences in the subject's immunoprofile that are representative of those distinct CDR3s shared between the subject's immunoprofile and the disease library to create one or more original sharing indices, (b) randomly selecting sequences from a public library stored in a database to form a sub-library, the sub-library comprising a number of sequences that is approximately equal to the number of distinct CDR3 sequences in the disease library, identifying one or more distinct CDR3 sequences that are shared between the subject's immunoprofile and the sub-library, summing a total number of detected sequences corresponding to those shared CDR3 sequences, and calculating a percentage of the total number of detected sequences in the subject's immunoprofile that are shared between the subject's immunoprofile and the sub-library to create a sampling sharing index (c) repeating step (b) at least 1000 or more times and (d) estimating the P-value as the fraction of times the sampling sharing indices are greater then or equal to the original sharing index between a patient's immunoprofile and a disease library.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The elements of the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other, emphasis instead being placed upon dearly illustrating the principles of the disclosure. Furthermore, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.



FIG. 1
a and FIG. 1b are photographs of gel illustrating the presence of amplification products obtained by the method of the invention using primers disclosed herein.



FIG. 2
a and FIG. 2b are cartoons representing the observed difference in diversity between an immunoprofile in an individual with a disease and an individual who is generally healthy, with each filled circle representing a distinct CDR3 sequence and the size of the circle representing the number of times that the distinct CDR3 sequence is found in the immunoprofile.



FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the method for generating a public library.



FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the method for generating a disease library.



FIG. 5 illustrates results obtained by comparing a patient immunoprofile with a disease library, calculating a percentage for each distinct CDR3 in the patient immunoprofile that is shared between the two, and adding those percentages to produce a sum, or sharing index.



FIG. 6 illustrates results obtained by comparing a patient immunoprofile with a subset of a public library, calculating a percentage for each distinct CDR3 that is shared between the two, and adding those percentages in the patient immunoprofile produce a sum, or sharing index.



FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the method of the invention, where the area under the curve represents total sharing indices obtained for subsets of a public library (sub-libraries), a P-value is estimated, and sharing indices for comparisons of an individual's immunoprofile and one or more disease libraries are represented by vertical lines (DL1, DL2, etc.).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The inventors have developed methods for evaluating antibody and T cell receptor rearrangements from a large number of cells, the methods being useful for comparing rearrangements identified in populations of individuals to determine whether there is a correlation between a specific rearrangement or set of rearrangements and a disease, or certain symptom of a disease. The method is also useful for establishing a history of the immune response of an individual or individuals in response to infectious and/or environmental agents as well as for evaluating the efficacy of vaccines.


The invention relates to a method for evaluating changes in immune response cell populations and associating those changes with a specific disease. In one aspect of the invention, the method comprises the amps of (a) isolating a subpopulation of white blood cells from at least one human or animal subject, (b) isolating RNA from the subpopulation of cells, (c) amplifying the RNA using RT-PCR in a first amplification reaction to produce amplicons using nested primers at least a portion of the nested primers comprising additional nucleotides to incorporate into a resulting amplicon a binding site for a communal primer, (d) separating the amplicons from the first amplification reaction from one or more unused primers from the first amplification reaction, (e) amplifying, by the addition of communal primers in a second amplification reaction, the amplicons of the first amplification reaction having at least one binding site for a communal primer, and (f) sequencing the amplicons of the second amplification reaction to identify antibody and/or receptor rearrangements in the subpopulation of cells. In one embodiment, the subpopulation may comprise a whole blood population or another mixed population sample.


In one embodiment, a peripheral blood sample is taken from a patient and the step of isolating a subpopulation of white blood cells may be performed by flow cytometry to separate naïve B cells, mature B cells, memory B cells, naïve T cells, mature T cells, and memory T cells. In various embodiments of the method, the recombinations in the subpopulation of cells are rearrangements of B-cell immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH), kappa and/or lamba light chains (IgK, IgL), T-cell receptor Beta, Gamma, or Delta.


In a second aspect of the invention, the method may comprise an additional step (g) comparing the rearrangements identified for a population of normal individuals with the rearrangements identified for a population of individuals who have been diagnosed with a disease to determine if there is a correlation between a specific rearrangement or set of rearrangements and the disease.


In another aspect of the invention, the method may comprise an additional step comprising (g) comparing the rearrangements identified for a population of individuals to whom a vaccine has been administered with the rearrangements identified for a population of individuals to whom the vaccine was not administered to evaluate the efficacy of the vaccine in producing an immune response.


In some embodiments, the step of separating the amplicons from the first amplification reaction from one or more unused primers from the first amplification reaction may be omitted and the two amplification reactions may be performed in the same reaction tube.


The inventor previously developed a PCR method known as tem-PCR, which has been described in publication number WO20051038039, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. More recently, the inventor has developed a method called arm-PCR, which was described in U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/042,259, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Also described is an apparatus for detecting target polynucleotides in a sample, the apparatus comprising a first amplification chamber for thermocycling to amplify one or more target polynucleotides to produce amplicons using nested primers, at least a portion of the nested primers composing additional nucleotides to incorporate into a resulting amplicon a binding site for a communal primer; a means for separating the amplicons from the first amplification reaction from one or more unused primers from the first amplification reaction and a second amplification chamber for thermocycling to amplify one or more amplicons produced during the first amplification reaction by the addition of communal primers in a second amplification reaction, the amplicons of the first amplification reaction having at least one binding site for at least one communal primer.


Also described is a PCR chip comprising a first PCR chamber fluidly connected to both a waste reservoir and a second PCR chamber, the waste reservoir and second PCR chamber each additionally comprising at least one electrode, the electrodes comprising, a means for separating amplicons produced from the first PCR chamber. The second PCR chamber is fluidly connected to a hybridization and detection chamber, the hybridization and detection chamber comprising microspheres, or beads, arranged so that the physical position of the beads is an indication of a specific target polynucleotide's presence in the sampled analyzed by means of the chip.


The tem-PCR, and especially the arm-PCR, methods provide semi-quantitative amplification of multiple polynucleotides in one reaction. Additionally, arm-PCR provides added sensitivity. Both provide the ability to amplify multiple polynucleotides in one reaction, which is beneficial in the present method because the repertoire of various T and B cells, for example, is so large. The addition of a communal primer binding site in the amplification reaction, and the subsequent amplification of target molecules using communal primers, gives a quantitative, or semi-quantitative result—making it possible to determine the relative amounts of the cells comprising various rearrangements within a patient blood sample. Clonal expansion due to recognition of antigen results in a larger population of cells which recognize that antigen, and evaluating cells by their relative numbers provides, a method for determining whether an antigen exposure has influenced expansion of antibody-producing B cells or receptor-bearing T cells. This is helpful for evaluating whether there may be a particular population of cells that is prevalent in individuals who have been diagnosed with a particular disease, for example, and may be especially helpful in evaluating whether or not a vaccine has achieved the desired immune response in individuals to whom the vaccine has been given.


There are several commercially available high throughput sequencing technologies, such as Roche Life Sciences's 454 sequencing. In the 454 sequencing method, 454A and 454B primers are linked onto PCR products either during PCR or ligated on after the PCR reaction. When done in conjunction with tem-PCR or arm-PCR, 454A and 454B primers may be used as communal primers in the amplification reactions. PCR products, usually a mixture of different sequences, are diluted to about 200 copies per μl. In an “emulsion PCR” reaction, (a semisolid gel like environment) the diluted PCR products are amplified by primers (454A or 454B) on the surface of the microbeads. Because the PCR templates are so dilute, usually only one bead is adjacent to one template, and confined in the semisolid environment, amplification only occurs on and around the beads. The beads are then eluted and put onto a plate with specially designed wells. Each well can only hold one bead. Reagents are then added into the wells to came out pyrosequencing. A fiber-optic detector may be used to read the sequencing reaction from each well and the data is collected in parallel by a computer. One such high throughput reaction could generate up to 60 million reads (60 million beads) and each read can generate about 300 bp sequences.


One aspect of the invention involves the development of a database of “personal immunorepertoires,” or immunoprofiles, so that each individual may establish a baseline and follow the development of immune responses to antigens, both known and unknown, over a period of years. This information may, if information is gathered from a large number of individuals, provide an epidemiological database that will produce valuable information, particularly in regard to the development of those diseases, such as cancer and heart disease, which are thought to often arise from exposure to viral or other infectious agents or transformed cells, many of which have as yet been unidentified. One particularly important use for the method of the invention involves the evaluation of children to determine whether infectious disease, environmental agents, or vaccines may be the cause of autism. For example, many have postulated that vaccine administration may trigger the development of autism. However, many also attribute that potential correlation to the use of agents such as thimerosol in the vaccine, and studies have demonstrated that thimerosol does not appear to be a causative agent of the disease. There is still speculation that the development of cocktail vaccines has correlated with the rise in the number of cases of autism, however, gathering data to evaluate a potential causal connection for multiple antigens is extremely difficult. The method of the present invention simplifies that process and may provide key information for a better understanding of autism and other diseases in which the immune response of different individuals may provide an explanation for the differential development of disease in some individuals exposed to an agent or a group of agents, while others similarly exposed do not develop the disease.


Imbalances of the immunoprofile, triggered by infection, may lead to many diseases, including cancers, leukemia, neuronal diseases (Alzheimer's, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's, autism etc.), autoimmune diseases, and metabolic diseases. These diseases may be celled immunoprofile diseases. There may be two immunoprofile disease forms. (1) a “loss of function” form, and (2) a “gain of function” form, in the “loss of function” form, a person is susceptible to a disease because his/her restricted and/or limited immunoprofile lacks the cells that produce the most efficient and necessary IGs and TRs. In the “gain of function” form, a person is susceptible to a disease because his/her immunoprofile gained cells that produce IGs and TRs that normally should not be there. In the “loss of a function” (LOF) immunoprofile diseases, an individual does not have the appropriate functional B or T cells to fight a disease. His/her HLA typing has determined that those cells are eliminated during the early stages of the immune cell maturation process, the cells generally being eliminated because they react to strongly to his/her own proteins.


One aspect of the invention also provides a method comprising (a) amplifying and sequencing one or more RNAs from the T cells and/or B cells from one or more individuals, (b) inputting the sequences into a database to provide data which may be stored on a computer, server, or other electronic storage device, (c) inputting identifying information and characteristics for an individual corresponding to the sequences of the one or more RNAs as data which may also be stored on a computer, server, or other electronic storage device, and (d) evaluating the data of step (b) end step (e) for one or more individuals to determine whether a conviction exists between the one or more RNA sequences and one or more characteristics of the individual corresponding to the sequence(s). Identifying information may include, for example, a patient identification number, a code comprising the patient's HLA type, a disease code comprising one or more clinical diagnoses that may have been made, a “staging code” comprising the date of the sample, a cell type code comprising the type of cell subpopulation from which the RNA was amplified and sequenced, and one or more sequence codes comprising the sequences identified for the sample.


The described method includes a novel primer design that riot only allows amplification of the entire immunorepertoire, but also allows amplification in a highly multiplex fashion and semiquantitatively. Multiplex amplification requires that only a few PCR or RT-PCR reactions will be needed. For example, all IGs may be amplified in one reaction, or it could be divided into two or three reactions for IgH, IgL or IgK. Similarly, the T-cell receptors (TRs) may be amplified in just one reaction, or may be amplified in a few reactions including TRA, TRB, TRD, and TRG. Semi-quantitative amplification means that all the targets in the multiplex reaction will be amplified independently, so that the end point analysis of the amplified products will reflect the original internal ratio among the targets.


In various aspects, the method can produce semi-quantitative amplification of polynucleotides comprising complementarity determining regions (CDRs), which result from genetic rearrangements within T or B cells and are responsible for the affinity and specificity of antibodies and/or T cell receptors for specific antigens. Semi-quantitative amplification provides a method to not only detect the presence of specific CDR3 sequences, but also determine the relative numbers of cells have produced the necessary recombination events to produce those CDR3 sequences.


One aspect of the invention therefore relates to a method for analyzing semi-quantitative sequence information to provide one or more immune status reports for a human or animal. The method for producing an immune status report comprising the steps of (a) identifying one or more distinct CDR3 sequences that are shared between a subject's immunoprofile and a disease library stored in a database summing the total of those shared CDR3 sequences and computing the percentage of the total number of sequences in the subject's immunoprofile that are shared between the subject's immunoprofile and the disease library to create one or more original sharing indices; (b) randomly selecting sequences from a public library stored in a database to form a sub-library, the sub-library comprising a number of sequences that is approximately equal to the number of distinct sequences in the disease library, identifying one or more distinct CDR3 sequences that are shared between the subject's immunoprofile and the sub-library, summing the total of those shared CDR3 sequences and calculating the percentage of the total number of sequences in the subject's immunoprofile that are shared between the subject's immunoprofile and the sub-library to create a sampling sharing index; (c) repeating step (b) at least 1000 or more times; and (d) estimating the P-value as the fraction of times the sampling sharing indices are greater than or equal to the original sharing index between a patient's immunoprofile and a disease library.


The inventors have discovered that the immunoprofile of individuals who have certain diseases, such as, for example, cancer, autoimmune disease, etc., may be characterized by a lack of diversity in one or more immune cell population(s). FIG. 1 is a cartoon illustrating the difference that may be observed between, for example, the distinct type and number of T-cells present in a blood sample from a cancer patient (FIG. 1a) and a healthy patient (FIG. 1b), where each circle represents a distinct type of T-cell, as represented by an amplified and sequenced recombined cDNA of the complementarity determining region of be T-cell receptor (e.g., CDR3), and the relative number of cells which are determined, by PCR amplification and sequencing, to share the same CDR3 sequence. As FIG. 1a indicates, these may be fewer distinct cells of different specificities, but larger numbers of cells of certain specificities, as represented by the CDR3 sequences. FIG. 1b illustrates a normal profile of more different cells, but fewer numbers of each type of cell sharing the same CDR3 sequence.


The list of each distinct CDR3-expressing cell, and the numbers of such cells represented within a blood or tissue sample from a human or animal, can constitute an immunoprofile for that human or animal. Compiling the immunoprofiles from a group of humans, for example, the group comprising both healthy individuals and individuals with various different diseases may provide a “public library” that is representative of the type of diversity found in a normal population (FIG. 2). Similarly, compiling the immunoprofiles of a group of individuals who have been clinically diagnosed with a particular disease may provide a “disease library” that is representative of the lack of diversity, the specific CDR3s of the expanded populations of cells, etc. (FIG. 3). These immunoprofiles may be stored in a database, accessible via computer access to the internet, for example, so that the information may be used in the method of the invention to analyze the immune status of a patient.


An immunoprofile, comprising a listing of distinct CDR3-expressing cells (“distinct CDR3s”, those cells sharing a unique CDR3 sequence) and the numbers of each distinct CDR3 present in a blood or tissue sample from an individual may be produced for an individual patient. The patient's immunoprofile is compared to the combined immunoprofiles of a group of patients who have been diagnosed with a particular disease (a disease library, stored in a database). This can be done for a series of disease libraries, and shown in FIG. 4.


Millions of possible combinations are possible for the public library, the immune systems of most of those individuals generally exhibiting increased diversity over that of a group of individuals who have been diagnosed with a specific disease. Therefore, the inventors determined that an accurate assessment and comparison for the method of the invention would be facilitated by the step of preparing sub-libraries by randomly sampling/selecting from the lists of distinct CDR3s and their numbers in the public library. The number of distinct CDR3 s, represented by unique peptide sequence of CDR3 fragments, should be approximately equal to the number of distinct CDR3s identified in the disease library, or an average calculated from more than one disease library. Producing a significant number of sub-frames, such as, for example, 1000 or more sub-frames, produced by randomly sampling from the public library, increases the presence of a variety of distinct CDR3s and produces a result that is statistically significant effective for identifying and characterizing an individual patient's immunoprofile as normal (“healthy”) or characterized by the presence of a type and number of cells that have been associated with a particular disease.


In the method of the invention, a patient supplies a clinical sample comprising, for example, blood or tissue, from which distinct CDR3s are semi-quantitatively amplified and sequenced. This provides the identity and the relative abundance of each CDR3 for all distinct CDR3s. This information may be entered into a program which accesses a database containing at least one public library and one or more disease libraries. Software used for data entry and/or analysis may be accessed via internet access to the database, or may be located on an individual personal computer, with internet access to the sequence information in the database. Comparisons are obtained between the individual immunoprofile and the various libraries and sub-libraries, and results are generated as generally illustrated in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5, where specific CDR3 sequences are detected, the numbers of those distinct CDR3 sequences detected are counted, and a determination is made as to whether or not that specific distinct CDR3 is present in both the individual's immunoprofile and a specific library (i.e., that specific distinct CDR3 is “shared” between the individual and the library). The percentages representing numbers of those CDR3s that are determined to be shared are added together to produce a sum comprising the fraction of the total that comprises CDR3s in the individual's immunoprofile shared between the individual's immunoprofile and the specific library (i.e., a “sharing index”). From the results obtained for the sub-libraries, a P-value is calculated as the probability that a random percentage would be greater than or equal to the percentage noted for a particular disease library, and a significant result is noted when the fraction of times the sampling sharing indices exceeds the original sharing index for a particular library is less than 0.01, for instance, if that sharing index represents the relationship between the individual's immunoprofile and a disease library, the individual may then be informed of the likelihood that the individual/patient has the disease represented by the specific disease library. If P-values computed against all disease libraries is greater than 0.01, the individual's report may indicate that the immune profile looks normal and the disease state has not been detected.


As sequence data is compiled and stored in one or more databases for multiple populations of individuals, it may additionally be possible to associate certain sharing indexes with libraries representing populations with pre-conditions predispositions to certain diseases. The immune system is both proactive and reactive, and changes in the immune system, reflected in the immunoprofile, may provide the first—and sometimes the only—signal that a predisposition, a precondition, or even an established disease is present. The inventors have utilized the method to demonstrate that certain types of cancers, inflammatory bowel disease, and certain viral infections may be detected by determining the sharing index between a patient and an established disease library, obtained by sequencing CDR3s using the ARM-PCR method to produce a subset of the immunorepertoire representing the CDR3s present.


The results are even more reliable when a filter is applied to the sequence data. For example, the inventors have developed a “SMART” filter for the sequence data that aids in the generation of significantly more reliable results. This is described further in the Examples.


By way of further explanation, the following example may be illustrative of the methods of the invention. Blood samples may be taken from children prior to administration of any vaccines, those blood samples for each child establishing a “baseline” from which future samples may be evaluated. For each child, the future samples may be utilized to determine whether there has been an exposure to an agent which has expanded a population of cells known to be correlated with a disease, and this may serve as a “marker” for the risk of development of the disease in the future. Individuals so identified may then be more closely monitored so that early detection is possible, and any available treatment options may be provided at an earlier stage in the disease process.


By means of providing another example, blood samples may be taken from children prior to administration of any vaccines, those blood samples from each child establishing a “baseline” from which future samples may be evaluated. For each child and for the entire population of children in the study, those baselines may be compared to the results of RNA sequencing of T and B cells using target-specific primers to amplify antibody and T-cell receptor, after vaccine administration. The comparison may further involve the evaluation of data regarding symptoms, diagnosed diseases, and other information associated for each individual with the corresponding antibody, and T-cell receptor sequences. If a relationship exists between the administration of a vaccine and the development of a particular disease, individuals who exhibit symptoms of that disease may also share a corresponding antibody or T-cell receptor, for example, or a set of corresponding antibodies or T-cell receptors.


The method of the invention may be especially useful for identifying commonalities between individuals with autoimmune diseases, for example, and may provide epidemiological data that will better describe the correlation between infectious and environmental factors and diseases such as heart disease, atherosclerosis, diabetes, and cancer—providing “biomarkers” that signal either the presence of a disease, or the tendency to develop disease.


The method may also be useful for development passive immunity therapies. For example, following exposure to an infectious agent, certain antibody-producing B cells anchor T cells are expanded. The method of the invention enables the identification of protective antibodies, for example, and those antibodies may be utilized to provide passive immunity therapies in situations where such therapy is needed.


The method of the invention may also provide the ability to accomplish targeted removal of cells with undesirable rearrangements, the method providing a means by which such cells rearrangements may be identified.


The inventor has identified and developed target-specific primers for use in the method of the invention. T-cell-specific primers are shown in Table 1, and antibody-specific primers are shown in Table 2. An additional embodiment of the invention is a method of using any one or a combination of primers of Table 1 or Table 2, to amplify RNA from a blood sample, and more particularly to identify antibodies, T-cell receptors, and HLA molecules within a population of cells.


Arm-PCR or tem-PCR may be used to amplify genes coding for the immunoglobulin superfamily molecules in am amplification method described previously by the inventor (Han et al, 2006, Simultaneous Amplification and Identification of 25 Human Papillomavirus Types with Templex Technology, J. Clin. Micro. 44(11), 4157-4162). In a tem-PCR reaction, nested gene-specific primers are designed to enrich the targets during initial PCR cycling. Later universal “Super” primers are used to amplify all targets. Primers are designated as Fo (forward out), Fi (forward in), Ri (reverse in), Ro (reverse out), FS (forward super primer) and RS (reverse super primer), with super primers being common to a variety of the molecules due to the addition of a binding site for those primers at the end of a target-specific primer. The gene-specific primers (Fo, Fi, Ri and Ro) are used at extremely low concentrations. Different primers are involved in the tem-PCR process at each of the three major stages. First, at the “enrichment” stage, low-concentration gene-specific primers are given enough time to find the templates. For each intended target, depending on which primers are used, four possible products may be generated Fo/Ro, F/Ro, F/Ri, and Fo/Ri. The enrichment stage is typically carried out for 10 cycles. In the second, or “tagging” stage, the annealing temperature is raised to 72° C., and only the long 40-nucleotide inside primers (Fi and Ri) will work. After 10 cycles of this tagging stage, all PCR products are “tagged” with the universal super primer sequences. Then, at the third “amplification” stage, high-concentration super primers work efficiently to amplify all targets and label the PCR products with biotin during the process. Specific probes may be covalently linked with Luminex color-mated beads.


To amplify the genes coding for immunoglobulin superfamily molecules, the inventor designed nested primers based on sequence information in the public domain. For studying B and T cell VDJ rearrangement, the inventor designed primers to amplify rearranged and expressed RNAs. Generally, a pair of nested forward primers is designed from the V genes and a set of reverse nested primers are designed from the J or C genes. The average amplicon size is 250-350 bp. For the igHV genes, for example, there are 123 genes that can be classified into 7 different families, and the present primers are designed to be family specific. However, if sequencing the amplified cDNA sequences, there are enough sequence diversities to allow further differentiation among the gene within the same family. For the MHC gene locus, the intent is to amplify genomic DNA.


EXAMPLES
Calculation of Sharing Index

Assuming that S is a subject's immunoprofile (IP), which is represented by N unique CDR3 sequences CDR31, CDR32, . . . CDR3n, each CDR3 has its own frequency s1, s2, . . . sn.


D is a disease library, which is the sum of a certain number of patients' immunoprofile with M unique CDR3s. All patients in the disease library were diagnosed to have the same disease.


P is a public library, which is the sum of a large number of control's immunoprofile.


The Sharing Index is defined as the sum of sx, sy, . . . xz, where CDR3x, CDR3y, . . . CDR3z are shared in the subject's immunoprofile and a library. Note that sx, sy, . . . sz is the frequency of CDR3s in the subject's immunoprofile, not in the library.


Assuming that there are always more unique CDR3s in a public library (P) than in a disease library (D), M unique CDR3s in the public library are randomly selected and used to create a sub-library P1 and the sharing index (SIp1) between the subject and the sub-library computed according to above formula. The sampling procedure is repeated 1000 or more times and 1000 or more SIpx are computed.


The sharing index SId between the subject and the disease library are computed in the same manner. The P-value is defined as the fraction of all SIs (SIp1, SIp2, . . . SIpx, SId. (Note that SId is included), which is equal to or greater than SId. Note that when sampling CDR3s in the public library, CDR3s found in x control's immunoprofiles are given x times of chances to be sampled.


Amplification of T or Rearrangement Sites

All oligos were resuspended using 1× TE. All oligos except 454A and 454B were resuspended to a concentration of 100 pmol/μL. 454A and 454B were resuspended to a concentration of 1000 pmol/μL. 454A and 454B are functionally the same as the communal primers described previously, the different sequences were used for follow up high throughput sequencing procedures.


Three different primer mixes were made. An Alpha Delta primer mix included 82 primers (all of TRAV-C+TRDV-C), a Beta Gamma primer mix included 79 primers (all of TRBVC and TRGV-C) and a B cell primer mix that included a total of 70 primers. Fo, Fi, and Ri primers were at a concentration of 1 pmol/μL. Ro primers were at a concentration of 5 pmol/μL. 454A and 454B were at a concentration of 30 pmol/μL.


Three different RNA samples were ordered from ALLCELLS (www.allcells.com). All samples were diluted down to a final concentration of 4 ng/uL. The samples ordered were:
















Cell type:
Source:









ALL-PB-MNC
A patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia



NPB-Pan T Cells
Normal T cells



NPB-B Cells
Normal B cells










RT-PCR was performed using a Qiagen One-Step RT-PCR kit. Each sample contained the following:


10 μL of Qiagen Buffer


2 μL of DNTP's


2 μL of Enzyme


23.5 μL of dH2O


10 μL of the appropriate primer mix


2.5 μL of the appropriate template (10 ng of RNA total)


The samples were run using the following cycling conditions:

    • 50° C. for 30 minutes
    • 95° C. for 15 minutes
    • 94° C. for 30 seconds


15 cycles of

    • 55° C. for 1 minute
    • 17° C. for 1 minute
    • 94° C. for 15 seconds


6 cycles of

    • 70° C. for 1 minute 30 seconds
    • 94° C. for 15 seconds


30 cycles of

    • 55° C. for 15 seconds
    • 72° C. for 15 seconds
    • 72° C. for 3 minutes
    • 4° C. Hold


The order of samples placed in the gel shown in FIG. 1a was: (1) Ladder (500 bp being the largest working down in steps of 20 bp, the middle bright band in FIG. 1a is 200 bp); (2) α+δ primer mix with 10 ng Pan T Cells Template; (3) β+γ primer mix with 10 ng Pan T Cells Template; (4) B Cell primer mix with 10 ng B Cells Template; (5) B Cell primer mix with 10 ng ALL Cells Template; (6) α+δ primer mix with 10 ng ALL Cells Template; (7) β+γ primer mix with 10 ng ALL Cells Template; 8. α+δ primer mix blank; (9) β+γ primer mix blank; (10) B Cell primer mix blank; (11) Running buffer blank. These samples were run on a pre-cast ClearPAGE® SDS 10% gel using 1× ClearPAGE® DNA native running buffer.


The initial experiment showed that a smear is generated from PCR reactions where templates were included. The smears indicate different sizes of PCR products were generated that represented a mixture of different VDJ rearrangements. There is some background amplification from the B cell reaction. Further improvement on that primer mix was required to clean up the reaction.


To determine whether the PCR products indeed include different VDJ rearrangements, it was necessary to isolate and sequence the single clones. Instead of using the routine cloning procedures, the inventor used a different strategy. PCR products generated from the Alpha Delta mix and the Beta Gamma mix (lanes 2 and 3 in FIG. 1a) were diluted 1:1000 and a 2 μl aliquot used as PCR template in the following reaction. Then, instead of using a mixture of primers that targeting the entire repertoire, one pair of specific Fi and Ri primers were used (5 pmol each) to amplify only one specific PCR product. The following cycling conditions were used to amplify the samples:

    • 95° C. for 5 minutes


30 cycles of

    • 94° C. for 30 seconds
    • 72° C. for 1 minute
    • 72° C. for 3 minutes
    • 4° C. hold


A Qiagen PCR kit was used to amplify the products. The Master Mix used for the PCR contained the following:


















Per Reaction
Master Mix x 12





















10x PCR Buffer
5
μL
60 μL



dNTP
1
μL
12 μL



HotStartTaq Plus
0.25
μL
 3 μL



H2O
39.75
μL
477 μL 










The photograph of the gel in FIG. 1b shows the PCR products of the following reactions: (1) Ladder; (2) TRAV1Fi+TRACRi with alpha delta Pan T PCR product; (3) TRAV2Fi+TRACRi with alpha delta Pan T PCR product; (4) TRAV3Fi+TRACRi with alpha delta Pan T PCR product; (5) TRAV4Fi+TRACRi with alpha delta Pan T PCR product; (6) TRAV5Fi+TRACRi with alpha delta Pan I PCR product; (7) TRAV1Fi+TRACRi with alpha delta Pan T PCR product; (8) TRAV2Fi+TRACRi with alpha delta Pan T PCR product; (9) TRAV3Fi+TRACRiwith alpha delta Pan I PCR product; (10) TRAV4Fi+TRACRi with alpha delta Pan T PCR product; (11) TRAV5Fi+TRACR with alpha delta Pan T PCR product; (12) PCR Blank. Primers listed as Fi are “forward inner” primers and primers listed as Fo are “forward outer” primers, with Ri and Ro indicating “reverse inner” and “reverse outer” primers, respectively.


As illustrated by FIG. 1b, a single PCR product was generated from each reaction. Different se bands were generated from different reactions. This PCR cloning approach is successful for two major reasons—(1) The PCR templates used in this reaction were diluted PCR products (1:1000) of previous reactions that used primer mixes to amplify all possible VDJ rearrangements (for example, a primer mix was used that included total of 82 primers to amplify T cell receptor Alpha and Delta genes) and (2) Only one pair of PCR primer, targeting a specific V gene, are used in each reaction during this “cloning” experiment. Some of these products were gel purified and sequenced. The following are example sequences obtained from the protocol described above. In every case, a single clone was obtained, and a specific T cell receptor V gene that matched the Fi primer was identified.









TRAV1 template + 454A as sequencing primer:


(SEQ ID NO. 1)


NNNNNNNNNNCNTANTCGGTCTAAGGGTACNGNTACCTCCTTTTGAAGGA





CCTCCAGATGAAAGACTCTGCCTCTTACCTCTGTGCTGTGAGAGATANCA





ACNATCACTTAATCTTGGGCGCTGGGAGCAGACTAATTATAATGCCAGAT





ATCCACAACCCTGACCCTGCCGCGTACCAGCTGAAAGACTATGAACAGGA





TGGGGAGGCAGNAGNAGNAG





TRAV1 template + 454A as sequencing primer:


(SEQ ID NO. 2)


NNNNNNNNNNGNANGNNGAGGGTTCTGGATATTTGGTTTNACAATTAGCT





TGGTCCCTGCTCCAAGATTAATTTGTAGTTGCTATCCCTCAGAGCAGAGA





GGTAAGAGGAAGAGTATTTCTTCTGGAGCTCCTTCAACAGGAGGAAACTG





TACCCTTTATACCTACTAAGGAATGAAGA





TRAV2 template + 454A as sequencing primer:


(SEQ ID NO. 3)


NNNNNNNNNNNNTNNCGGTTCTCTTNNTCGCTGCTCATCCTCCAGGTGCG





GGAGGCAGATGCTGCTGTTTACTACTGTGCTGTGNANNANGGCANNGACA





ACAACCTCNTCTTTGGTGGAGGNACCCTACTNNTGGTTATNCCNAATANC





CANAACCCTGACCCTGCCGAGNAGCAGCANAAAAACTNNNAGGGGGGTGG





AGAAGNANNNNN





TRAV3 template + 454A as sequencing primer:


(SEQ ID NO. 4)


NNNNNNNNNNNNNNGGNNNGGNAGCTATGGCTTTGAAGCTGAATTTAACA





AGAGCCAAACCTCCTTCCACCTGAAGAAACCATCTGCCCTTGTGAGCGAC





TCCGCTTTGTACTTCTGTGCTGTGAGAGACATCAACGCTGCCGGCAACAA





CCTAACTTTTGGAGGAAGAACCATGGTGCTAGTTAAACCAAATATCCATA





ACCCTGACGCTGCCGTGTACCAGCTGAAAGACTCTGAGGGGGCTGGAGAG





GNAGGNG





TRAV4 template + 454A as sequencing primer


(SEQ ID NO. 5)


NNNNNANNGGNNNNNGTTTATCCCTGCCGACAGAAAGTCCAGCACTCTGA





GCCTGCCCCGGGTTTCCCTGAGCGACACTGCTGTGTACTACTGCCTCGTG





GGTGACCGGTCTGGAAACAGCGATGAAATTTTCATCTTAGGAAGAAGAAC





GCTTCTAGTCATCCANCCCAACATCCACAACCCTGCCGCGGAGNAGCACC





AGAAAAAAGATGATGAGGGGGANGNAGNAGNANNNN





TRAV5 template + 454A as sequencing primer:


(SEQ ID NO. 6)


NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNTCNCTGNTCTATTGAATAAAAAGGATAAACATCT





GTCTCTGCGCATTGCAGACACCCAGACTGGGGACTCAGCTATCTACTTCT





GTGCAGAGAGCCCCGGTGGCGGCAGCAACTTCTTCTTTGGTGGAGGAGCA





NTACTACTAGTCGTTCTACATANCCACAACCATGATNCCGCCGAGTACNT





GCTGAAAAAATATGATGAGGATGGAGAAGAAGNAGCATNAN





TRBV19Fi template + 454A as sequencing primer:


(SEQ ID NO. 7)


NNNNNNNNCTGAGGGTANNCGTCTCTCGGGAGAAGAAGGAATCCTTTCCT





CTCACTGTGACATCGGCCCAAAAGAACCCGACAGCTTTCTATCTCTGTGC





CAGTAGTATGGGGGGGGGGGCCTACAATGAGNACGGCGGCGGGGGAGGGA





CNNTGCTCGTCGTGGAGGAGGACATGAAGGTCTTGCCCGCNNCNGAGGAA





GNTGNANANGAACCATAAAAATGCGCTGGCTGAANNN





TR8V20Fi template + 454A as sequencing primer:


(SEQ ID NO. 8)


NNNNNNNNNNNGCTCNNNNNNCNCATACGAGCAAGGCGTCGAGAAGGACA





AGTTTCTCACAACCATGCAAGCCTGACCTTGTCCACTCTGACAGTGACCA





GTGCCCATCCTGAAGACAGCAGCTTCTACATCTGCAGTGCTAGAGGGGGG





GGGGGGGACGACTACTACTACTTCGGCGGGGGGGGCATGCTGATCGTGGA





GGAGGAGGACATGNAGCTCCTCCGCGCCGCCGAGGTTGTTGTGTNTNNAN





CATCATACTGNTGGTGGAGNAGNAGNAGCN





TRBV21Fi template + 454A as sequencing primer:


(SEQ ID NO. 9)


NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNGNNNNNNNNNNNTACTTTCNGAATGAAGAACTTAT





TCAGAAAGCAGAAATAATCAATGAGCGATTTTTAGCCCAATGCTCCAAAA





ACTCATCCTGTACCTTGGAGTTCCAGTCCACGGAGTCAGGGGACACAGCA





CTGTATTTCTGTGCCAGCAGCA





TRBV23Fi template + 454A as sequencing primer:


(SEQ ID NO. 10)


NNNGNNNNNNNANNGGANANGCACAAGAAGCGATTCTCATCTCAATGCCC





CAAGAACGCACCCTGCAGCCTGGCAATCCTGTCCTCAGAACCGGGAGACA





CGGCACTGTATCTCTGCGCCAGCAGTCAATCGGGGGGGGGGGGGAGGGCC





GTCCGCAGCGGGGGGGGGGGGGGCCGGGGGACGGTCCCAAAGAGAAAGAA





AACCTGCCCCCCGCGCTCGGGCGGTGTGATTGAGCGAAACAGACAGGAAG





GNAAGNAAAAAANNNNANCNNCNCTCNN





TRBV24Fi template + 454A as sequencing primer:


(SEQ ID NO. 11)


NNNNNNNNGNNANNNTCTGATGGANACAGTGTCTCTCGACAGGCACAGGC





TAAATTCTCCCTGTGCCCTAGAGTCTGCCATCCCCAACCAGACAGCTCTT





TACTTCTGTGCCACCAGTGANGCGGGGGGCGGGGACCACTACTTCGGGGG





GGGGAGGCGGACCAGGGTGCTGGTCGACGAGAAAAAGGAGCTCCCCCCCG





CCGCCGCTGTGGTTGTTGCTTCATAATAATCAGGNNGGNGAGGNAGNAGN





AANN






To investigate the impact of artifacts on the overall repertoire analysis of the TCRβ transcriptome, the inventors conducted control experiments using chemically synthesized TCRβ CDR3 templates. For this, the inventors chemically synthesized four distinct clones, clonally purified each clone, and prepared different mixes of the four constucts as templates for amplicon rescue multiplex (ARM)-PCR. Two different reaction mixtures were subjected to two independent ARM-PCR reactions, and the pooled PCR products were sequenced at a length of 100 bp from both ends using the Illimuna HiSeq2000®. The inventors first joined together paired-end reads through overlapping alignment with a modified Needleman-Wunsch algorithm, and then mapped the merged sequences to germline V, D and J reference sequences.


Without cleaning, the inventors obtained a total of 5,729,613 sequences from template mix I that could be mapped to TCRβ V, D and J segments. Surprisingly, the sequence reads purportedly represented a total of 36,439 unique CDR3 variants. Therefore, given that only four distinct CDR3 variants were present in the template mixtures, virtually all of the identified CDR3 variants must be non-authentic. Similar results were obtained for the second template mix, in which a total of 9,131,681 VDJ-mapped sequences were identified that mimicked the existence of 50,354 unique TCRβ CDR3 variants. The inventors' independent sequencing experiments show that only a few distinct CDR3 template variants can create artifactual repertoire diversities that far outweigh the real template diversity, and thus the inventors set out to eliminate these artifacts.


The quality of 3′ end Illumina sequencing reads is generally considered to be low. In the context of repertoire sequencing, this is troublesome because PCR primers need to be positioned distal enough from the hypervariable V(D)J junctions to avoid negative effects due to primer-template mismatching. As a consequence, the CDR3 segments of interest are generally “shifted” closer to the 3′ end of the sequencing reads, the region with increased sequencing error rates. Another technical issue that deserves attention is the observation that sequencing errors are context-specific end consequently strand-specific. Therefore, it is realistic to assume that the probability that a sequencing error a forward read coincides with that in the corresponding reverse read is rare.


Considering this, the inventors devised a paired-end strategy that affords double-strand sequencing of complete TCR CDR3 segments on the basis of the Illumina® technology. In this approach, forward and reverse sequencing primers are positioned at the framework region 3 and at the TCR J region or the 5′ end of the C region, respectively. Taking into account the average length of Illumina sequence reads (currently 100-150 bp) this design enables the complete sequencing of both strands that define a CDR3 segment. In a second step, the forward and reverse reads are then analyzed for sequence mismatches and CDR3 sequences that exhibit non-identity of both strands are eliminated using a newly developed paired-end filtering algorithm.


Applying this sequencing error filter to the 5,729,613 CDR3 sequences obtained for template mix I, the inventors identified a total of 2,751,131 (48%) CDR3 sequences that contained conflicting sequence information on their opposite strands. Discarding of these sequences resulted in the elimination of 35,455 (97.2%) distinct artifactual CDR3 variants. Consistent with this, the paired-end filter removed 4,308,020 (47%) CDR3 sequences from template mix II, leading to the elimination of 49,063 (97.4%) artifectual CDR3 variants. A total of 973 and 1271 unique CDR3 variants, respectively, passed through the filter. These results indicate that paired-end sequencing and filtering reduces the total number of non-authentic unique CDR3 sequences by almost two orders of magnitude.


Detailed analysis of the frequency distribution of the non-authentic CDR3 variants after the sequencing error filter revealed that in both mixtures approximately 50% of all artifacts were single-copy sequences. About 10% of these artifactual CDR3s displayed >100 copy numbers and accounted for >80% of all artifactual CDR3 variants. Given that variable TCR genes do not undergo somatic hypermutation, the inventors developed a reference algorithm that identifies and removes CDR3 sequence reads that display nucleotide mismatches relative to the mapped germline V, D and J reference sequences, as these must be artifacts generated at the level of PCR amplification or sequencing.


Applying this filtering algorithm to the “paired-end filtered” sequences of template mix I, a total of 29,804 sequences, which corresponded to 609 unique CDR3 variants, were removed. For template mix II, 54,516 artifactual sequences (831 unique CDR3 variants) were identified. Thus, the use of the reference sequence filter leads to a 60% reduction of non-authentic distinct CDR3 sequences. The reference filter is ineffective at the V-J and D-J junctions because the randomly added nucleotides in these regions during somatic recombination cannot be mapped. Therefore, the inventors implemented a PCR filter after computational simulation experiments to better understand four variables: the impact of the initial template number, the replication efficiency of each cycle, the cycle number (n), and the DNA polymerase error rate (μ) on the total end-point error rate. In contrast, the inventors noted that the PCR polymerase error rate has a pronounced effect on the number of accumulated errors


In the inventors' control sequencing experiments, PCR amplification was performed with 15 cycles and 45 cycles in the first and second reaction, using Taq polymerase. To simulate error accumulation during the ARM-PCR reactions more realistically, the PCR efficiency was set to decreased 5% per cycle for the first 25 cycles and 10% per cycle for the remaining cycles. The PCR efficiency was reset to 1.0 for each fresh PCR reaction. Furthermore, the inventors allowed mutation at the second position. Published substitution error rates for Taq enzyme, expressed as errors per bp per cycle, range from 0.023×10−4 to 2.1×10−4. In the simulation experiments, the substitution error rate was set at 2.7×10−5, and the insertion-deletion (indel) error rate was set as 1.0×10−6. Taq polymerase is known to have a much higher insertion-and-deletion (indel) mutation rate in homopolymeric region of templates. For a homopolymeric region, indel mutation in any position of this region generates identical pattern. Therefore, the indel error rate in a homopolymeric region was set n×μ, where n is the length of the homopolymeric region and μ is 1.0×10−6.


Because the impact of the initial template number and the PCR efficiency on the endpoint error rate is small, it should be safe to apply the same end-point error rate estimated from the simulation experiments to molecules with different initial number and different replication efficiencies in a multiplex PCR reaction. The cutoff error rates (μ) were empirically set as error rates at the 9999th 10000-quantiles point for each category. For two similar CDR3 sequences, A and B, of frequency NA and NB (NA>>NB) that differ in less than three positions, if NA*μ≧NB, where μ is the corresponding cutoff error rate, CDR3 sequence B will be excluded. Applying this filtering algorithm to the “reference filtered” sequences of template mix I, a total of 22,369 sequences, which corresponded to 281 unique CDR3 variants, were removed. For template mix II, 39,920 artifactual sequences (348 unique CDR3 variants) were identified (Table 1). Thus, the use of the PCR amplification error filter leads to a further reduction of non-authentic distinct CDR3 sequences by around 80%.


In the pool of sequences that had passed through the above filters, the inventors identified several high-abundance CDR3 variants, which differed from their most similar input template sequences at multiple positions. Because the occurrence of PCR substitution and/or indel mutation at multiple positions of CDR3 fragments is extremely rare according to simulation experiments, those CDR3 variants must arise from other source of artifacts. Intriguingly, the inventors noted that some of these sequences were composed of the fragments of two distinct input templates and exhibited clear breakpoints, which identified them as chimeras. Chimeric sequences are PCR artifacts that arise from incomplete primer extension or template switching during PCR and form mosaic-like structures. In light of this unexpected PCR artifact, the inventors developed a computational “mosaic filter.” Using this filtering algorithm, the inventors identified a total of 17 and 15 chimeric sequences in template mixtures I and II respectively. Of note, some of these CDR3 chimeras displayed sequence copy numbers >1000, indicating that the inventors algorithm for the filter is capable of identifying high-abundance chimeric CDR3 sequences.


Application of the filtering algorithms resulted in the elimination of 99.8% of the non-authentic unique CDR3 sequences generated by high-throughput sequencing of only four defined TCR CDR3 templates. Only 62 and 73 artifactual CDR3 sequences, respectively, passed through all filters. Among these, the two most abundant CDR3 sequences were identical in both mixing experiments. Most likely they represent chimeric artifacts which escaped filtering because of a single nucleotide substitution located exactly at the breakpoint. Among the remaining erroneous CDR3, 85% (n=53) and 75% (n=55) were single reads, respectively. To eliminate this minor fraction of artifacts, the inventors propose that high-stringency data analysis of TCR immune repertoires should include an additional filter that removes single copy CDR3 reads (frequency threshold filter).














TABLE 1






Primer

SEQ ID

SEQ ID


Locus
Name
Sequence
NO.
Sequence
NO.




















TRAV-C
TRAV1Fo
TGCACGTACC
12
TGCACGTACCA
12




AGACATCTGG

GACACTGG




TRAV1Fi
AGGTCCCTTTT
13
GCCTCCCTCGC
14




TCTTCATTCC

GCCATCAGAGG







TCGTTTTTCTTC







ATTCC




TRAV2Fo
TCTGTAATCA
15
TCTGTAATCACT
15




CTCTGTGTCC

CTGTGTCC




TRAV2Fi
AGGGACGATA
16
GCCTCCCTCGC
17




CAACATGACC

GCCATCAGAGG







GACGATACAAC







ATGACC




TRAV3Fo
CTATTCAGTC
18
CTATTCAGTCT
18




TCTGGAAACC

CTGGAAACC




TRAV3Fi
ATAGATCACA
19
GCCTCCCTCGC
20




GGGGATAACC

GCCATCAGATA







CATCAGAGGGG







ATAACC




TRAV4Fo
TGTAGGCACA
21
TGTAGCCACAA
21




ACAACATTGC

CAACATTGC




TRAV4Fi
AAAGTTACAA
22
GCCTCCCTCGC
23




ACGAAGTGGC

GCCATCAGAAA







GTTACAAACGA







AGTGGC




TRAV5Fo
GCACTTACAC
24
GCACTTACACA
24




AGACAGCTCC

GACAGCTCC




TRAV5Fi
TATGGACATG
25
GCCTCCCTCGC
26




AAACAAGACC

GCCATCAGTAT







GGACATGAAAC







AAGACC




TRAV6Fo
GCAACTATAC
27
GCAACTATACA
27




AAACTATTCC

AACTATTCC




TRAV6Fi
GTTTTCTTGC
28
GCCTCCCTCGC
29




TACTCATACG

GCCATCAGGTT







TTCTTGCTACTC







ATACG




TRAV7Fo
TGCACGTACT
30
TGCACGTACTC
30




CTGTCAGTCG

TGTCAGTCG




TRAV7Fi
GGATATGAGA
31
GCCTCCCTCGC
32




AGCAGAAAGG

GCCATCAGGGA







TATGAGAAGCA







GAAAGG




TRAV8Fo
AATCTCTTCT
33
AATCTCTTCTG
33




GGTATGTSCA

GTATGTSCA




TRAV8Fi
GGYTTTGAGG
34
GCCTCCCTCGC
35




CTGAATTTA

GCCATCAGGGY







TTTGAGGCTGA







ATTTA




TRAV9Fo
GTCCAATATC
36
GTCCAATATCC
36




CTGGAGAAG

TGGAGAAGG





G






TRAV9Fi
AACCACTTCT
37
GCCTCCCTCGC
38




TTCCACTTGG

GCCATCAGAAC







CACTTCTTTCCA







CTTGG




TRAV10Fo
AATGCAATTA
39
AATGCAATTATA
39




TACAGTGAGC

CAGTGAGC




TRAV10Fi
TGAGAACACA
40
GCCTCCCTCGC
41




AAGTCGAACG

GCCATCAGTGA







GAACACAAAGT







CGAACG




TRAV11Fo
TCTTAATTGTA
42
TCTTAATTGTAC
42




CTTATCAGG

TTATGAGG




TRAV11Fi
TCAATCAAGC
43
GCCTCCCTCGC
44




CAGAAGGAG

GCCATCAGTCA





C

ATCAAGCCAGA







AGGAGC




TRAV12Fo
TCAGTGTTCC
45
TCAGTGTTCCA
46




AGAGGGAGC

GAGGGAGCC





C






TRAV12Fi
ATGGAAGGTT
46
GCCTCCCTCGC
47




TACGCACAG

GCCATCAGATG







GAAGGTTTACA







GCACAG




TRAV13Fo
ACCCTGAGTG
48
ACCCTGAGTGT
48




TCCAGGAGG

CCAGGAGGG





G






TRAV13Fi
TTATAGACAT
49
GCCTCCCTCGC
50




TCGTTCAAAT

GCCATCAGTTA







TAGACATTCGT







TCAAAT




TRAV14Fo
TGGACTGCAC
51
TGGACTGCACA
51




ATATGACACC

TATGACACC




TRAV14Fi
CAGCAAAATG
52
GCCTCCCTCGC
53




CAACAGAAGG

GCCATCAGCAG







CAAAATGCAAC







AGAAGG




TRAV16Fo
AGCTGAAGTG
54
AGCTGAAGTGC
54




CAACTATTCC

AACTATTCC




TRAV16Fi
TCTAGAGAGA
55
GCCTCCCTCGC
56




GCATCAAAGG

GCCATCAGTCT







AGAGAGAGCAT







CAAAGG




TRAV17Fo
AATGCCACCA
57
AATGCCACCAT
57




TGAACTGCAG

GAACTGCAG




TRAV17Fi
GAAAGAGAGA
58
GCCTCCCTCGC
59




AACACAGTGG

GCCATCAGGAA







AGAGAGAAACA







CAGTGG




TRAV18Fo
GCTCTGACAT
60
GCTCTGACATT
60




TAAACTGCAC

AAACTGCAC




TRAV18Fi
CAGGAGACG
61
GCCTCCCTCGC
62




GACAGCAGA

GCCATCAGCAG





GG

GAGACGGACAG







CAGAGG




TRAV19Fo
ATGTGACCTT
63
ATGTGACCTTG
63




GGACTGTGTG

GACTGTGTG




TRAV19Fi
GAGCAAAATG
64
GCCTCCCTCGC
65




AAATAAGTGG

GCCATCAGGAG







CAAAATGAAAT







AAGTGG




TRAV20Fo
ACTGCAGTTA
66
ACTGCAGTTAC
66




CACAGTCAGC

ACAGTCAGC




TRAV20Fi
AGAAAGAAAG
67
GCCTCCCTCGC
68




GCTAAAAGCC

GCCATCAGAGA







AAGAAAGGCTA







AAAGCC




TRAV21Fo
ACTGCAGTTT
69
ACTGCAGTTTC
69




CACTGATAGC

ACTGATAGC




TRAV21Fi
CAAGTGGAAG
70
GCCTCCCTCGC
71




ACTTAATGCC

GCCATCAGCAA







GTGGAAGACTT







AATGCC




TRAV22Fo
GGGAGCCAAT
72
GGGAGCCAATT
72




TCCACGCTGC

CCACGCTGC




TRAV22Fi
ATGGAAGATT
73
GCCTCCCTCGC
74




AAGCGCCAC

GCCATCAGATG





G

GAAGATTAAGC







GCCACG




TRAV23Fo
ATTTCAATTAT
75
ATTTCAATTATA
75




AAACTGTGC

AACTGTGC




TRAV23Fi
AAGGAAGATT
76
GCCTCCCTCGC
77




CACAATCTCC

GCCATCAGAAG







GAAGATTCACA







ATCTCC




TRAV24Fo
GCACCAATTT
78
GCACCAATTTC
78




CACCTGCAGC

ACCTGCAGC




TRAV24Fi
AGGACGAATA
79
GCCTCCCTCGC
80




AGTGCCACTC

GCCATCAGAGG







ACGAATAAGTG







CCACTC




TRAV25Fo
TCACCACGTA
81
TCACCACGTAC
81




CTGCAATTCC

TGCAATTCC




TRAV25Fi
AGACTGACAT
82
GCCTCCCTCGC
83




TTCAGTTTGG

GCCATCAGAGA







CTGACATTTCA







GTTTGG




TRAV26Fo
TCACAGATT
84
TCGACAGATTC
84




CMCTCCCAG

MCTCCCAGG





G






TRAV26Fi
GTCCAGYACC
85
GCCTCCCTCGC
86




TTGATCCTGC

GCCATCAGGTC







CAGYACCTTGA







TCCTGC




TRAV27Fo
CCTCAAGTGT
87
CCTCAAGTGTT
87




TTTTTCCAGC

TTTTCCAGC




TRAV27Fi
GTGACAGTAG
88
GCCTCCCTCGC
89




TTACGGGTGG

GCCATCAGGTG







AGAGTAGTTAC







GGGTGG




TRAV29Fo
CAGCATGTTT
90
CAGCATGTTTG
90




GATTATTTCC

ATTATTTCC




TRAV29Fi
ATCTATAAGT
91
GCCTCCCTCGC
92




TCCATTAAGG

GCCATCAGATC







TATAAGTTCCAT







TAAGG




TRAV30Fo
CTCCAAGGCT
93
CTCCAAGGCTT
93




TTATATTCTG

TATATTCTG




TRAV30Fi
ATGATATTAC
94
GCCTCCCTCGC
95




TGAAGGGTG

GCCATCAGATG





G

ATATTACTGAA







GGGTGG




TRAV34Fo
ACTGCACGTC
96
ACTCCACGTCA
96




ATCAAAGACG

TCAAAGACG




TRAV34Fi
TTGATGATGC
97
GCCTCCCTCGC
98




TACAGAAAGG

GCCATCAGTTG







ATGATGCTACA







GAAAGG




TRAV35Fo
TGAACTGCAC
99
TGAACTGCACT
99




TTCTTCAAGC

TCTTCAAGC




TRAV35Fi
CTTGATAGCC
100
GCCTCCCTCGC
101




TTATATAAGG

GCCATCAGCTT







GATAGCCTTAT







ATAAGG




TRAV36Fo
TCAATTGCAG
102
TCAATTGCAGT
102




TTATGAAGTG

TATGAAGTG




TRAV36Fi
TTTATGCTAA
103
GCCTCCCTCGC
104




CTTCAAGTGG

GCCATCAGTTT







ATGCTAACTTC







AAGTGG




TRAV38Fo
GCACATATGA
105
GCACATATGAC
105




CACCAGTGAG

ACCAGTGAG




TRAV38Fi
TCGCCAAGAA
106
GCCTCCCTCGC
107




GCTTATAAGC

GGCATCAGTCG







CCAAGAAGCTT







ATAAGC




TRAV39Fo
TCTACTGCAA
108
TCTACTGCAATT
108




TTATTCAACC

ATTCAACC




TRAV39Fi
CAGGAGGGA
109
GCCTCCCTCGC
110




CGATTAATGG

GCCATCAGCAG





C

GAGGGACGATT







AATGGC




TRAV40Fo
TGAACTGCAC
111
TGAACTGCACA
111




ATACACATCC

TACACATCC




TRAV40Fi
ACAGCAAAAA
112
GCCTCCCTCGC
113




CTTCGGAGGC

CCATCAGACA







GCAAAAACTTC







GGAGGC




TRAV41Fo
AACTGCAGTT
114
AACTGCAGTTA
114




ACTCGGTAGG

CTCGGTAGG




TRAV41Fi
AAGCATGGAA
115
GCCTCCCTCGC
116




GATTAATTGC

GCCATCAGAAG







CATGGAAGATT







AATTGC




TRACRo
GCAGACAGAC
117
GCAGACAGACT
117




TTGTCACTGG

TGTCACTGG




TRACRi
AGTCTCTCAG
118
GCCTTGCCAGC
119




CTGGTACACG

CCGCTCAGAGT







CTCTCAGCTGG







TACACG






TRBV-C
TRBV1Fo
AATGAAACGT
120
AATGAAACGT
120




GAGCATCTGG

AGCATCTGG




TRBV1Fi
CATTGAAAAC
121
GCCTCCCTCGC
122




AAGACTGTGC

GCCATCAGCAT







TGAAAACAAGA







CTGTGC




TRBV2Fo
GTGTCCCCAT
123
GTGTCCCCATC
123




CTCTAATCAC

TCTAATCAC




TRVV2Fi
TGAAATCTCA
124
GCCTCCCTCGC
125




GAGAAGTCTG

GCCATCAGTGA







AATCTCAGAGA







AGTCTG




TRBV3Fo
TATGTATTGG
126
TATGTATTGGTA
126




TATAAACAGG

TAAACAGG




TRBV3Fi
CTCTAAGAAA
127
GCCTCCCTCGC
128




TTTCTGAAGA

GCCATCAGCTC







TAAGAAATTTCT







GAAGA




TRBV4Fo
GTCTTTGAAA
129
GTCTTTGAAAT
129




TGTGAACAAC

GTGAACAAC




TRBV4Fi
GGAGCTCATG
130
GCCTCCCTCGC
131




TTTGTCTACA

GCCATCAGGGA







GCTCATGTTTG







TCTACA




TRBV5Fo
GATCAAAACG
132
GATCAAAACGA
132




AGAGGACAG

GAGGACAGC





C






TRBV5aFi
CAGGGGCCC
133
GCCTCCCTCGC
134




CAGTTTATCT

GCCATCAGCAG





T

GGGCCCCAGTT







TATCTT




TRBV5bFi
GAAACARAGG
135
GCCTCCCTCGC
136




AAACTTCCCT

GCCATCAGGAA







ACARAGGAAAC







TTCCCT




TRBV6aFo
GTGTGCCCAG
137
GTGTGCCCAGG
137




GATATGAACC

ATATGAACC




TRBV6bFo
CAGGATATGA
138
CAGGATATGAG
138




GACATAATGC

ACATAATGC




TRBV6aFi
GGTATCGACA
139
GCCTCCCTCGC
140




AGACCCAGG

GCCATCAGGGT





C

ATCGACAAGAC







CCAGGC




TRBV6bFi
TAGACAAGAT
141
GCCTCCCTCGC
142




CTAGGACTGG

GCCATCAGTAG







ACAAGATCTAG







GACTGG




TRBV7Fo
CTCAGGTGTGA
143
CTCAGGTGTGA
143




ATCCAATTTC

TCCAATTTC




TRBV7aFi
TCTAATTTACT
144
GCCTCCCTCGC
145




TCCAAGGCA

GCCATCAGTCT







AATTTACTTCCA







AGGCA




TRBV7bFi
TCCCAGAGTG
146
GCCTCCCTCGC
147




ATGCTCAACG

GCCATCAGTCC







CAGAGTGATGC







TCAACG




TRBV7cFi
ACTTACTTCA
148
GCCTCCCTCGC
149




ATTATGAAGC

GCCATCAGACT







TACTTCAATTAT







GAAGC




TRBV7dFi
CCAGAATGAA
150
GCCTCCCTCGC
151




GCTCAACTAG

GCCATCAGCCA







GAATGAAGCTC







AACTAG




TRBV9Fo
GAGACCTCTC
152
GAGACCTCTCT
152




TGTGTACTGG

GTGTACTGG




TRBV9Fi
CTCATTCAGT
153
GCCTCCCTCGC
154




ATTATAATGG

GCCATCAGCTC







ATTCAGTATTAT







AATGG




TRBV10Fo
GGAATCACCC
155
GGAATCACCCA
155




AGAGCCCAAG

GAGCCCAAG




TRBV10Fi
GACATGGGCT
156
GCCTCCCTCGC
157




GAGGCTGATC

GCCATCAGGAC







ATGGGCTGAGG







CTGATC




TRBV11Fo
CCTAAGGATC
158
CCTAAGGATCG
158




GATTTTCTGC

ATTTTCTGC




TRBV11Fi
ACTCTCAAGA
159
GCCTCCCTCGC
160




TCCAGCCTGC

GCCATCAGACT







CTCAAGATCCA







GCCTGC




TRBV12Fo
AGGTGACAGA
161
AGGTGACAGAG
161




GATGGGACAA

ATGGGACAA




TRBV12aFi
TGCAGGGACT
162
GCCTCCCTCGC
163




GGAATTGCTG

GCCATCAGTGC







AGGGACTGGAA







TTGCTG




TRBV12bFi
GTACAGACAG
164
GCCTCCCTCGC
165




ACCATGATGC

GCCATCAGGTA







CAGACAGACCA







TGATGC




TRBV13Fo
CTATCCTATC
166
CTATCCTATCC
166




CCTAGACACG

CTAGACACG




TRBV13Fi
AAGATGCAGA
167
GCCTCCCTCGC
168




GCGATAAAGG

GCCATCAGAAG







ATGCAGAGCGA







TAAAGG




TRBV14Fo
AGATGTGACC
169
AGATGTGACCC
169




CAATTTCTGG

AATTTCTGG




TRBV14Fi
AGTCTAAACA
170
GCCTCCCTCGC
171




GGATGAGTCC

GCCATCAGAGT







CTAAACAGGAT







GAGTCC




TRBV15Fo
TCAGACTTTG
172
TCAGACTTTGA
172




AACCATAACG

ACCATAACG




TRGV15Fi
AAAGATTTA
173
GCCTCCCTCGC
174




ACAATGAAGC

GCCATCAGAAA







GATTTTAACAAT







GAAGC




TRBV16Fo
TATTGTGCCC
175
TATTGTGCCCC
175




CAATAAAAGG

AATAAAAGG




TRBV16Fi
AATGTCTTTG
176
GCCTCCCTCGC
177




ATGAAACAGG

GCCATCAGAAT







GTCTTTGATGA







AACAGG




TRBV17Fo
ATCCATCTTC
178
ATCCATCTTCT
178




TGGTCACATG

GGTCACATG




TRBV17Fi
AACATTGCAG
179
GCCTCCCTCGC
180




TTGATTCAGG

GCCATCAGAAC







ATTGCAGTTGA







TTCAGG




TRBV18Fo
GCAGCCCAAT
181
GCAGCCCAATG
181




GAAAGGACAC

AAAGGACAC




TRBV18Fi
AATATCATAG
182
GCCTCCCTCGC
183




ATGAGTCAGG

GCCATCAGAAT







ATCATAGATGA







GTCAGG




TRBV19Fo
TGAACAGAAT
184
TGAACAGAATT
184




TTGAACCACG

TGAACCACG




TRBV19Fi
TTTCAGAAAG
185
GCCTCCCTCGC
186




GAGATATAGC

GCCATCAGTTT







CAGAAAGGAGA







TATAGC




TRBV20Fo
TCGAGTGCCG
187
TCGAGTGCCGT
187




TTCCCTGGAC

TCCCTGGAC




TRBV20Fi
GATGGCAACT
188
GCCTCCCTCGC
189




TCCAATGAGG

GCCATCAGGAT







GGCAACTTCCA







ATGAGG




TRBV21Fo
GCAAAGATGG
190
GCAAAGATGGA
190




ATTGTGTTCC

TTGTGTTCC




TRBV21Fi
CGCTGGAAGA
191
GCCTCCCTCGC
192




AGAGCTCAAG

GCCATCAGCGC







TGGAAGAAGAG







CTCAAG




TRBV23Fo
CATTTGGTCA
193
CATTTGGTCAA
193




AAGGAAAAGG

AGGAAAAGG




TRBV23Fi
GAATGAACAA
194
GCCTCCCTCGC
195




GTTCTTCAAG

GCCATCAGGAA







TGAACAAGTTC







TTCAAG




TRBV24Fo
ATGCTGGAAT
196
ATGCTGGAATG
196




GTTCTCAGAC

TTCTCAGAC




TRBV24Fi
GTCAAAGATA
197
GCCTCCCTCGC
198




TAAACAAAGG

GCCATCAGGTC







AAAGATATAAA







CAAAGG




TRBV25Fo
CTCTGGAATG
199
CTCTGGAATGT
199




TTCTCAAACC

TCTCAAACC




TRBV25Fi
TAATTCCACA
200
GCCTCCCTCGC
201




GAGAAGGGA

GCCATCAGTAA





G

TTCCACAGAGA







AGGGAG




TRBV26Fo
CCCAGAATAT
202
CCCAGAATATG
202




GAATCATGTT

AATCATGTT




TRBV26Fi
ATTCACCTGG
203
GCCTCCCTCGC
204




CACTGGGAG

GCCATCAGATT





C

CACCTGGCACT







GGGAGC




TRBV27Fo
TTGTTCTCAG
205
TTGTTCTCAGA
205




AATATGAACC

ATATGAACC




TRBV27Fi
TGAGGTGACT
206
GCCTCCCTCGC
207




GATAAGGGAG

GCCATCAGTGA







GGTGACTGATA







AGGGAG




TRBV28Fo
ATGTGTCCAG
208
ATGTGTCCAGG
208




GATATGGACC

ATATGGACC




TRBV28Fi
AAAAGGAGAT
209
GCCTCCCTCGC
210




ATTCCTGAGG

GCCATCAGAAA







AGGAGATATTC







CTGAGG




TRBV29Fo
TCACCATGAT
211
TCACCATGATG
211




GTTCTGGTAC

TTCTGGTAC




TRBV29Fi
CTGGACAGAG
212
GCCTCCCTCGC
213




CCTGACACTG

GCCATCAGCTG







GACAGAGCCTG







ACACTG




TRBV30Fo
TGTGGAGGG
214
TGTGGAGGGAA
214




AACATCAAAC

CATCAAACC





C






TRBV30Fi
TTCTACTCCG
215
GCCTCCCTCGC
216




TTGGTATTGG

GCCATCAGTTC







TACTCCGTTGG







TATTGG




TRBCRo
GTGTGGCCTT
217
GTGTGGCCTTT
217




TTGGGTGTGG

TGGGTGTGG




TRBCRi
TCTGATGGCT
218
GCCTTGCCAGC
219




CAAACACAGC

CCGCTCAGTCT







GATGGCTCAAA







CACAGC






TRDV-C
TRDV1Fo
TGTATGAAAC
220
TGTATGAAACA
220




AAGTTGGTGG

AGTTGGTGG




TRDV1Fi
CAGAATGCAA
221
GCCTCCCTCGC
222




AAAGTGGTCG

GCCATCAGCAG







AATGCAAAAAG







TGGTCG




TRDV2Fo
ATGAAAGGAG
223
ATGAAAGGAGA
223




AAGCGATCGG

AGCGATCGG




TRDV2Fi
TGGTTTCAAA
224
GCCTCCCTCGC
225




GACAATTTCC

GCCATCAGTGG







TTTCAAAGACA







ATTTCC




TRDV3Fo
GACACTGTAT
226
GACACTGTATA
226




ATTCAAATCC

TTCAAATCC




TRDV3Fi
GCAGATTTTA
227
GCCTCCCTCGC
228




CTCAAGGACG

GCCATCAGGCA







GATTTTACTCAA







GGACG




TRDCRo
AGACAAGCGA
229
AGACAAGCGAC
229




CATTTGTTCC

ATTTGTTCC




TRDCRi
ACGGATGGTT
230
GCCTTGCCAGC
231




TGGTATGAGG

CCGCTCAGACG







GATGGTTTGGT







ATGAGG






TRGV-C
TRGV1-5Fo
GGGTCATCTG
232
GGGTCATCTGC
232




CTGAAATCAC

TGAAATCAC




TRGV1-
AGGAGGGGA
233
GCCTCCCTCGC
234



5,8Fi
AGGCGCCACA

GCCATCAGAGG





G

AGGGGAAGGC







CCCACAG




TRGV8Fo
GGGTCATCAG
235
GGGTCATCAGC
235




CTGTAATCAC

TGTAATCAC




TRGV5pFi
AGGAGGGGA
236
GCCTCCCTCGC
237




AGACCCCACA

GCCATCAGAGG





G

AGGGGAAGACC







CCACAG




TRGV9Fo
AGCCCCGCCT
238
AGCCCGCCTGG
238




GGAATGTGTG

AATGTGTGG





G






TRGV9Fi
GCACTGTCAG
239
GCCTCCCTCGC
240




AAAGGAATCC

GCCATCAGGCA







CTGTCAGAAAG





GAATCC






TRGV10Fo
AAGAAAAGTA
241
AAGAAAAGTAT
241




TTGACATACC

TGACATACC




TRGV10Fi
ATATTGTCTC
242
GCCTCCCTCGC
243




AACAAAATCC

GCCATCAGATA







TTGTCTCAACA







AAATCC




TRGV11Fo
AGAGTGCCCA
244
AGAGTGCCCAC
244




CATATCTTGG

ATATCTTGG




TRGV11Fi
GCTCAAGATT
245
GCCTCCCTCGC
246




GCTCAGGTG

GCCATCAGGCT





G

CAAGATTGCTC







AGGTGG




TRGCRo
GGATCCCAGA
247
GGATCCCAGAA
247




ATCGTGTTGC

TCGTGTTGC




TRGCRi
GGTATGTTCC
248
GCCTTGCCAGC
249




AGCCTTCTGG

CCGCTCAGGGT







ATGTTCCAGCC







TTCTGG





















TABLE 2






Primer

SEQ ID

SEQ ID


Locus
Name
Sequence
NO.
Ordered
NO.







IgHV-J
IgHV1aFo
AGTGAAGGTCTC
250
AGTGAAGGTCTC
250




CTGCAAGG

CTGGAAGG




IgHV1bFo
AGTGAAGGTTTC
251
AGTGAAGGTTTC
251




CTGCAAGG

CTGCAAGG




IgHV1aFi
AGTTCCAGGGCA
252
GCCTCCCTCGCG
253




GAGTCAC

CCATCAGAGTTC







CAGGGCAGAGTC







AC




IgHV1bFi
AGTTTCAGGGCA
254
GCCTCCCTCGCG
255




GGGTCAC

CCATCAGAGTTT







CAGGGCAGGGTC







AC




IgHV1cFi
AGTTCCAGGAAA
256
GCCTCCCTCGCG
257




GAGTCAC

CCATCAGAGTTC







CAGGAAAGAGTC







AC




IgHV1dFi
AATTCCAGGACA
258
GCCTCCCTCGCG
259




GAGTCAC

CCATCAGAATTC







CAGGACAGAGTC







AC




IgHV2Fo
TCTCTGGGTTCT
260
TCTCTGGGTTCT
260




CACTCAGC

CACTCAGC




IgHV2Fi
AAGGCCCTGGAG
261
GCCTCCCTCGCG
262




TGGCTTGC

CCATCAGAAGGC







CCTGGAGTGGCT







TGC




IgHV3aFo
TCCCTGAGACTC
263
TCCCTGAGACTC
263




TCCTGTGC

TCCTGTGC




IgHV3bFo
CTCTCCTGTGCA
264
CTCTCCTGTGCA
264




GCCTCTGG

GCCTCTGG




IgHV3cFo
GGTCCCTGAGAC
265
GGTCCCTGAGAC
265




TCTCCTGT

TCTCCTGT




IgHV3dFo
CTGAGACTCTCC
266
CTGAGACTCTCC
266




TGTGTAGC

TGTGTAGC




IgHV3aFi
CTCCAGGGAAGG
267
GCCTCCCTCGCG
268




GGCTGG

CCATCAGCTCCA







GGGAAGGGGCT







GG




IgHV3bFi
GGCTCCAGGCAA
269
GCCTCCCTCGCG
270




GGGGCT

CCATCAGGGCTC







CAGGCAAGGGGC







T




IgHV3cFi
ACTGGGTCCGCC
271
GCCTCCCTCGCG
272




AGGCTCC

CCATCAGACTGG







GTCCGCCAGGCT







CC




IgHV3dFi
GAAGGGGCTGGA
273
GCCTCCCTCGCG
274




GTGGGT

CCATCAGGAAGG







GGCTGGAGTGGG







T




IgHV3eFi
AAAAGGTCTGGA
275
GCCTCCCTCGCG
276




GTGGGT

CCATCAGAAAAG







GTCTGGAGTGGG







T




IgHV4Fo
AGAGCCTGTCCC
277
AGACCCTGTCCC
277




TCACCTGC

TCACCTGC




IgHV4Fi
AGGGVCTGGAGT
278
GCCTCCGTCGCG
279




GGATTGGG

CCATCAGAGGGV







CTGGAGTGGATT







GGG




IgHV5Fo
GCGCCAGATGCC
280
GCGCCAGATGCC
280




CGGGAAAG

CGGGAAAG




IgHV5i
GGCCASGTCACC
281
GCCTCCCTCGCG
282




ATCTCAGC

CCATCAGGGCCA







SGTCACCATCTC







AGC




IgHV6Fo
CCGGGGACAGTG
283
CCGGGGACAGTG
283




TCTCTAGC

TCTCTAGC




IgHV6Fi
GCCTTGAGTGGC
284
GCCTCCCTCGCG
285




TGGGAAGG

CCATCAGGCCTT







GAGTGGCTGGGA







AGG




IgHV7Fo
GTTTCCTGCAAG
286
GTTTCCTGCAAG
286




GCTTCTGG

GCTTCTGG




IgHV7Fi
GGCTTGAGTGGA
287
GCCTCCCTCGCG
288




TGGGATGG

CCATCAGGGCTT







GAGTGGATGGGA







TGG




IgHJRo
ACCTGAGGAGAC
289
ACCTGAGGAGAC
289




GGTGACC

GGTGACC




IgHJ1Ri
CAGTGCTGGAAG
290
GCCTTGCCAGCC
291




TATTCAGC

CGCTCAGCAGTG







CTGGAAGTATTC







AGC




IgHJ2Ri
AGAGATCGAAGT
292
GCCTTGCCAGCC
293




ACCAGTAG

CGCTCAGAGAGA







TCGAAGTACCAG







TAG




IgHJ3Ri
CCCCAGATATCA
294
GCCTTGCCAGCC
295




AAAGCATC

CGCTCAGCCCCA







GATATCAAAAGC







ATC




IgHJ4Ri
GGCCCCAGTAGT
296
GCCTTGCCAGCC
297




CAAAGTAG

CGCTCAGGGCCC







CAGTAGTCAAAG







TAG




IgHJ5Ri
CCCAGGGGTCGA
298
GCCTTGCCAGCC
299




ACCAGTTG

CGCTCAGCCCAG







GGGTCGAACCAG







TTG




IgHJ6Ri
CCCAGACGTCCA
300
GCCTTGCCAGCC
301




TGTAGTAG

CGCTCAGCCCAG







ACGTCCATGTAG







TAG






IgKV-C
IgKV1Fo
TAGGAGACAGAG
302
TAGGAGACAGAG
302




TCACCATC

TCACCATC




IgKV1Fi
TTCAGYGRCAGT
303
GCCTCCCTCGCG
304




GGATCTGG

CCATCAGTTCAG







YGRCAGTGGATC







TGG




IgKV2Fo
GGAGAGCCGOC
305
GGAGAGCCOGC
305




CTCCATCTC

CTCCATCTC




IgKV2aFi
TGGTACCTGCAG
306
GCCTCCCTCGCG
307




AAGCCAGG

CCATCAGTGGTA







CCTGCAGAAGCG







AGG




IgKV2bFi
CTTCAGCAGAGG
308
GCCTCCCTCGCG
309




CCAGGCCA

CCATCAGCTTCA







GCAGAGGCCAGG







CCA




IgKV3-7Fo
GCCTGGTACCAG
310
GCCTGGTACCAG
310




CAGAAACC

CAGAAACC




IgKV3Fi
GCCAGGTTCAGT
311
GCCTCCCTCGCG
312




GGCAGTGG

CCATCAGGCCAG







GTTCAGTGGCAG







TGG




IgKV6-7Fi
TCGAGGTTCAGT
313
GCCTCCCTCGCG
314




GGCAGTGG

CCATCAGTCGAG







GTTCAGTGGCAG







TGG




IgKV4-5Fi
GACCGATTCAGT
315
GCCTCCCTCGCG
316




GGCAGCGG

CCATCAGGACCG







ATTCAGTGGCAG







CGG




IgKCRo
TTCAACTGCTCAT
317
TTCAACTGCTCAT
317




CAGATGG

CAGATGG




IgKCRi
ATGAAGACAGAT
318
GCCTTGCCAGCC
319




GGTGCAGC

CGCTCAGATGAA







GACAGATGGTGC







AGC






IgLV-C
IgLV1aFo
GGGCAGAGGGTC
320
GGGCAGAGGGTC
320




ACCATCTC

ACCATCTC




IgLV1bFo
GGACAGAAGGTC
321
GGACAGAAGGTC
321




ACCATCTC

ACCATCTC




IgLV1aFi
TGGTAGGAGCAG
322
GCCTCCCTCGCG
323




CTCCCAGG

CCATCAGTGGTA







CCAGCAGCTCCC







AGG




IgLV1bFi
TGGTACCAGCAG
324
GCCTCCCTCGCG
325




CTTCCAGG

CCATCAGTGGTA







CCAGCAGCTTCC







AGG




IgLV2Fo
CTGCACTGGAAC
326
CTGCACTGGAAG
326




CAGCAGTG

CAGCAGTG




IgLV2Fi
TCTCTGGCTCCA
327
GCCTCCCTCGCG
328




AGTCTGGC

CCATCAGTCTCT







GGCTCCAAGTCT







GGC




IgLV3aFo
ACCAGCAGAAGC
329
ACCAGCAGAAGC
329




CAGGCCAG

CAGGCCAG




IgLV3bFo
GAAGCAGGACA
330
GAAGCCAGGACA
330




GGCCCCTG

GGCCCCTG




IgLV3aFi
CTGAGCGATTCT
331
GCCTCCCTCGCG
332




CTGGCTCC

CCATCAGCTGAG







CGATTCTCTGGC







TCC




IgLV3bFi
TTCTCTGGGTCC
333
GCCTCCCTCGCG
334




ACCTCAGG

CCATCAGTTCTCT







GGGTCCACCTCA







GG




IgLV3cFi
TTCTCTGGCTCC
335
GCCTCCCTCGCG
336




AGCTCAGG

CCATCAGTTCTCT







GGCTCCAGCTCA







GG




IgLV4Fo
TCGGTCAAGCTC
337
TCGGTCAAGCTC
337




ACCTGCAC

ACCTGCAC




IgLV4Fi
GGGCTGACCGCT
358
GCCTCCCTCGCG
338




ACCTCACC

CCATCAGGGGCT







GACCGCTACCTC







ACC




IgLV5Fo
CAGCCTGTGCTG
339
CAGCCTGTGCTG
339




ACTCAGCC

ACTCAGCC




IgLV5Fi
CCAGCCGCTTCT
340
GCCTCCCTCGCG
341




CTGGATCC

CCATCAGCCAGC







CGCTTCTCGGA







TCCV




IgLV6Fo
CCATCTCTGCA
342
CCATCTCCTGCA
342




CCCGCAGC

CCCGCAGC




IgLV7-8Fo
TCCCCWGGAGG
343
TCCCCWGGAGG
343




GACAGTCAC

GACAGTCAC




IgLV9,11Fo
CTCMCCTGCACC
344
CTCMCCTGCACC
344




CTGAGCAG

CTGAGCAG




IgLV10Fo
AGACCGCCACAC
345
AGACCGCCACAC
345




TCACCTGC

TCACCTGC




IgLV6,8Fi
CTGATCGSTTCTC
346
GCCTCCCTCGCG
347




TGGCTCC

CCATCAGCTGAT







CGSTTCTCTGGC







TCC




IgLV7Fi
CTGCCCGGTTCT
348
CTGCCCGGTTCT
348




CAGGCTCC

CAGGCTCC




IgLV9Fi
ATCCAGGAAGAG
349
GCCTCCCTCGCG
359




GATGAGAG

CCATCAGATCCA







GGAAGAGGATGA







GAG




IgLV10-11Fi
CTCCAGCCTGAG
351
GCCTCCCTCGCG
352




GACGAGGC

CCATCAGGTCCA







GCCTGAGGACGA







GGC




IgLC1-7Ro
GCTCCCGGGTAG
353
GCTCCCGGGTAG
353




AAGTCACT

AAGTCACT




IgLC1-7Ri
AGTGTGGCCTTG
354
GCCTTGCCAGCC
355




TTGGCTTG

CGCTCAGAGTGT







GGCCTTGTTGGC







TTG




454A
GCCTCCCTCGCG
356
GCCTCCCTCGCG
356




CCATCAG

CCATCAG




454B
GCCTTGCCAGGC
351
GCCTTGCCAGCC
351




CGCTCAG

CGCTCAG








Claims
  • 1. A method for evaluating changes in immune response cell populations and associating those changes with a specific disease, the method comprising the steps of: (a) isolating a subpopulation of white blood cells from at least one human or animal subject;(b) isolating RNA from the subpopulation of cells;(c) amplifying the RNA using RT-PCR in a first amplification reaction to produce amplicons using nested primers, at least a portion of the nested primers comprising additional nucleotides to incorporate into a resulting amplicon a binding site for a communal primer;(d) separating the amplicons from the first amplification reaction from one or more unused primers from the first amplification reaction;(e) amplifying, by the addition of communal primers in a second amplification reaction, the amplicons of the first amplification reaction having at least one binding site for a communal primer; and(f) sequencing the amplicons of the second amplification reaction to identify antibody and/or receptor rearrangements in the subpopulation of cells.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the product of the second amplification reaction is a polynucleotide comprising the complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3).
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of isolating a subpopulation of white blood cells is performed by flow cytometry.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the subpopulation of white blood cells comprises T cells.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the T cells are selected from the group consisting of naïve T cells, mature T cells and memory T cells.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the subpopulation of white blood cells comprises B cells.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the B cells are selected from the group consisting of naïve B cells, mature B cells and memory B cells.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the rearrangements in the subpopulations of cells are selected from the group consisting of rearrangements of B-cell immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH), B-cell kappa, B-cell lambda light chains, T-cell receptor Beta, T-cell Gamma and T-cell Delta.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: (g) comparing the rearrangements identified for a population of individuals to whom a vaccine has been administered with the rearrangements identified for a population of individuals to whom the vaccine was not administered; and(h) evaluating the efficacy of the vaccine in producing an immune response.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: (g) comparing the rearrangements identified for a population of normal individuals with the rearrangements identified for a population of individuals who have been diagnosed with a disease;(h) determining if there is a correlation between a specific rearrangement or set of rearrangements and the disease.
  • 11. A method for analyzing semi-quantitative sequence information to provide one or more immune status reports for a human or animal, the method comprising the steps of: (a) identifying one or more distinct CDR3 sequences that are shared between a subject's immunoprofile and a cumulative immunoprofile from a disease library stored in a database;(b) summing a total number of a subject's detected sequences corresponding to those shared distinct CDR3 sequences;(c) computing the percentage of the total number of detected sequences in the subject's immunoprofile that are representative of those distinct CDR3s shared between the subject's immunoprofile and the disease library to create one or more original sharing indices;(d) randomly selecting sequences from a public library stored in a database to form a sub-library, the sub-library comprising a number of distinct CDR3 sequences that is approximately equal to the number of distinct CDR3 sequences in the disease library;(e) identifying one or more distinct CDR3 sequences that are shared between the subject's immunoprofile and the sub-library;(f) summing a total number of detected sequences corresponding to those shared CDR3 sequences and calculating a percentage of the total number of detected sequences in the subject's immunoprofile that are shared between the subject's immunoprofile and the sub-library to create a sampling sharing index;(g) repeating steps (d)-(f) at least 1000 or more times; and(h) estimating the P-value as the fraction of times the sampling sharing indices are greater than or equal to the original sharing index between a patient's immunoprofile and a disease library.
  • 12. A method for developing a database of personal immunorepertoires, the method comprising the steps of: (a) amplifying and sequencing one or more RNAs from a subpopulation of white blood cells from one or more individuals;(b) inputting the sequences into a database to provide data which may be stored on a computer, server, or other electronic storage device;(c) inputting identifying information and characteristics for an individual corresponding to the sequences of the one or more RNAs as data which may also be stored on a computer, server, or other electronic storage device, and(d) evaluating the data of step (b) and step (a) for one or more individuals to determine whether a correlation exists between the one or more RNA sequences and one or more characteristics of the individual corresponding to the sequence(s).
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the identifying information is selected from the group consisting of a patient identification number, a code comprising the patient's HLA type, a disease code comprising one or more clinical diagnoses that may have been made, a “staging code” comprising the date of the sample, a cell type code comprising the type of cell subpopulation from which the RNA was amplified and sequenced, and one or more sequence codes comprising the sequences identified for the sample.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the subpopulation of white blood cells comprises T cells.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the T cells are selected from the group consisting of naïve T cells, mature T cells and memory T cells.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, wherein the subpopulation of white blood cells comprises B cells.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the B cells are selected from the group consisting of naïve B cells, mature B cells and memory B cells.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/763,341, entitled “Method for Evaluating an Immunorepertoire” and filed on Feb. 11, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US14/15841 2/11/2014 WO 00
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61763451 Feb 2013 US