Claims
- 1. A method of evaluating the vestibular function in a human subject, comprising:constraining the human subject in a substantially erect position so that the head moves in unison with the rest of the body; imparting a controlled stimulus in the form of a sudden angular acceleration to the body, and; measuring the subject's ocular response to the controlled stimulus.
- 2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the subject's ocular response is measured by electro-oculography.
- 3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the human subject is rotated about its longitudinal axis.
- 4. A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the subject is disposed in a substantially vertical position.
- 5. A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the subject is disposed in a substantially horizontal position.
- 6. A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the subject is disposed in an erect inclined position.
- 7. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the angular velocity of the subject is measured as a whole and compared with the ocular response to evaluate the vestibular function.
- 8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the angular velocity is measured in three orthogonal directions.
- 9. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the ocular response is subjected to signal processing to extract eye velocity.
- 10. A method as claimed in claim 9, wherein said signal processing comprises filtering and differentiation.
- 11. A method as claimed in claimed in claim 9, wherein the eye velocity is compared with the angular velocity of the subject to evaluate the vestibular function.
- 12. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the eye velocity and head velocity are also compared with standard data in evaluating the vestibular function.
- 13. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the subject is rapidly brought to rest with the aid of a fluid damping mechanism.
- 14. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the fluid damping mechanism comprises one or more bodies coupled to rotate with the subject and suspended in a damping fluid.
- 15. A method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the damping fluid is water.
- 16. An apparatus for evaluating vestibular function in a human subject, comprising:a frame for supporting the human subject in a substantially erect position with the head constrained so that it moves in unison with the rest of the body, the frame being rotatable about a longitudinal axis of the subject; an arrangement for measuring ocular response to a controlled stimulus in the form of a sudden angular acceleration imparted to the frame, at least one sensor for measuring the angular velocity of the subject's head; and a processing unit for deriving the vestibular function from the subject's ocular response and the angular velocity.
- 17. An apparatus as claimed in claim 16, wherein the frame is mounted for rotation about a vertical axis.
- 18. An apparatus as claimed in claim 16, wherein the frame is mounted for rotation about a horizontal axis.
- 19. An apparatus as claimed in claim 18, wherein the frame is mounted for rotation about a vertical axis.
- 20. An apparatus as claim in claim 17, wherein the frame has a first clamp for constraining the subject's body and a second clamp for constraining the subject's head.
- 21. An apparatus as claimed in claim 16, wherein said arrangement includes ocular electrodes attached to electrode leads that are fastened with the aid of a stabilizing ring attached to the subject's head.
- 22. An apparatus as claimed in claim 16, wherein said at least one sensor for measuring angular velocity comprises three mutually perpendicular angular velocity sensors.
- 23. An apparatus as claimed in claim 16, wherein said arrangement for measuring ocular response is an electro-oculogram unit.
- 24. An apparatus as claimed in claim 23, wherein said processing unit is arranged to process an output of said electro-oculogram unit to derive eye velocity therefrom.
- 25. An apparatus as claimed in claim 24, wherein said processing unit is programmed to compare said eye velocity with head velocity to evaluate the vestibular function.
- 26. An apparatus as claimed in claim 25, wherein said processing unit is further programmed to compare said eye velocity and head velocity with standard data in order to evaluate the vestibular function.
- 27. An apparatus as claimed in claim 16, further comprising a mechanical energy storage device, and an impulse unit for imparting a sudden acceleration to said frame.
- 28. An apparatus as claimed in claim 16, further comprising a headgear on which said at least one angular velocity sensor is mounted to measure directly said angular velocity of the subject's head without slip.
- 29. An apparatus in claim 16, wherein the frame is coupled to a fluid damping mechanism for rapidly bringing the subject to rest after the initial acceleration.
- 30. An apparatus as claimed in claim 29, wherein said fluid damping mechanism comprises one or more bodies coupled to rotate with the subject and suspended in a damping fluid.
- 31. An apparatus as claimed in claim 30, wherein an array of said bodies is arranged to rotate about a central axis.
- 32. An apparatus as claimed in claim 31, wherein said bodies are cylindrical.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application claims the benefit of under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/212,641 filed Jun. 19, 2000.
PCT Information
Filing Document |
Filing Date |
Country |
Kind |
PCT/CA01/00894 |
|
WO |
00 |
Publishing Document |
Publishing Date |
Country |
Kind |
WO01/97684 |
12/27/2001 |
WO |
A |
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
4474186 |
Ledley et al. |
Oct 1984 |
A |
5942954 |
Galiana et al. |
Aug 1999 |
A |
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry |
Ivanenko, YP et al., “Effect of gaze on postural responses to neck proprioceptive and vestibular stimulation in humans,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 519.1, pp. 301-314, 1999. |
Provisional Applications (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
|
60/212641 |
Jun 2000 |
US |