This relates generally to virtual assistants and, more specifically, to mechanisms for using live data for recognition of requests provided to virtual assistants.
Electronic devices are able to access an increasingly larger and more diverse quantity of functions, services, and information, both via the Internet and from other sources. Functionality for such devices continues to improve rapidly, with advances in both hardware and software applications of consumer devices, smartphones, tablet computers, and the like. In many instances, each software application, function, website, or other feature can have its own user interface and operational models, which can be difficult to learn and even overwhelming for some novice users. Moreover, many users may overlook or be unaware of the extensive device functionality and information available to them. Such users may be unable to use certain resources effectively, and some users may become frustrated or overwhelmed by the growing capabilities of consumer devices.
In addition to novice users, a variety of other individuals may find it difficult to effectively utilize the many features available on consumer devices. For example, individuals who are impaired, disabled, elderly, busy, distracted, operating a vehicle, engaged in certain activities, or the like may have difficulty interfacing with their electronic devices safely and effectively. Such users can also be particularly likely to find it difficult to navigate the large number of diverse functions, applications, websites, features, and the like that may be available.
An intelligent automated assistant (or virtual assistant) can beneficially provide an improved interface between a human user and an electronic device that addresses the needs of certain users while also providing enhanced functionality for even expert users. For example, a virtual assistant can facilitate effective use of the varied functions, applications, websites, features, and the like that may be available.
In some examples, a virtual assistant can function by recognizing and responding to known requests in predetermined ways. A virtual assistant, however, may not yet recognize and may not yet be trained to respond to a variety of new requests from users that may change over time. For example, users can request information from a new source, request information from a known source in a new way, request a certain function using as-yet unrecognized terminology, request a new function for a new software application, or the like. In addition, recognized or known source information can become outdated over time, and the virtual assistant may not recognize new terminology employed by users to refer to updated information. For example, users may request information related to future events (e.g., a movie premier), but the virtual assistant may not yet recognize related terminology (e.g., the new movie title). Accordingly, a virtual assistant can receive user requests that it is unable to effectively handle as, for example, source information changes over time and as users make new requests or make certain requests in new ways.
Systems and processes are disclosed for virtual assistant request recognition using live usage data and anticipated or future data. In one example, a user request received by a virtual assistant can be compared to known request templates to determine how to respond. If the received request is not recognized, the received request can be used to develop candidate request templates that can be stored and tracked to determine the salience of each of the candidate request templates. For example, candidate templates formed from unrecognized user requests can be stored in a database. As new candidate templates are received, they can be compared to candidate templates already in the database. When matching candidate templates are identified, a count associated with matched candidate templates can be incremented to reflect how frequently the candidate template has been identified from received requests. When a count associated with a candidate template reaches a threshold level, the corresponding candidate template can be considered salient and can be used to train the virtual assistant to recognize similar requests in the future (e.g., an associated language model can be trained with the candidate templates).
In some examples, a virtual assistant can be trained with data that is expected to appear in future user requests. Data relating to future events can be received, and names, dates, addresses, and like information can be extracted from the received data. The extracted data can be used to populate or seed recognized user request templates to generate new populated request templates (e.g., whole user utterances). The populated request templates can be used to train a virtual assistant, such that when the future data becomes relevant, the virtual assistant can be prepared to recognize and respond to related user requests.
In other examples, data relating to future events can be combined with candidate request templates that a virtual assistant may not yet recognize. For example, names, dates, addresses, and the like extracted from data relating to future events can be used to populate or seed candidate request templates that have been deemed salient based on how frequently they have been received. The populated candidate request templates can be used to train a virtual assistant along with training the virtual assistant to recognize and respond to the corresponding unpopulated candidate request templates.
In the following description of examples, reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which it is shown by way of illustration specific examples that can be practiced. It is to be understood that other examples can be used and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the various examples.
This relates to virtual assistant request recognition using live usage data and anticipated or future data. In one example, a received user request can be compared to known or recognized request templates to determine how to respond. If the received request is not recognized (e.g., a matching known request template is not found), the received request can be used to develop candidate request templates that can be stored and tracked to determine the salience of each of the candidate request templates. For example, a user request can be parsed into a variety of candidate templates based on combinations and sub-combinations of parsed phrases (or n-grams) of the request. Each of the candidate templates can be compared to previously stored candidate templates to determine whether each template has been developed from a prior user request from the same or a different user. When matching candidate templates are identified, a count associated with matched candidate templates can be incremented to reflect how frequently the candidate template has been identified from received requests.
As the same candidate template is identified multiple times from various as yet unrecognized user requests, the count associated with a particular candidate template can increase significantly. When the count associated with a particular candidate template reaches a threshold level, a notification can be generated including the candidate request template to indicate that the candidate request template may be salient and useful for language models used to recognize and respond to user requests. In some examples, when a count reaches a threshold level, an associated candidate request template can be automatically included in virtual assistant language models or otherwise used to train virtual assistants to recognize the user request in the future. By training virtual assistants (or training language models associated with virtual assistants) with candidate request templates that appear frequently enough to be considered salient, virtual assistants can more effectively recognize and respond to user requests and adapt as user requests change over time.
In another example, virtual assistants can be trained with anticipated or future data (e.g., data relating to a future event). Anticipated or future data can be received or mined from a variety of sources, such as news feeds, blogs, websites, or the like. A variety of names, event details, dates, and other information can be extracted from the received data. The extracted data can then be used to generate new populated request templates or request enumerations (e.g., complete expected user utterances) by populating or seeding known user request templates with the future data (e.g., inserting future data into request templates). For example, new populated request templates can be specific user requests, including entities or defined variables that a virtual assistant can use to formulate a particular response (e.g., detailed requests including specific search terms that a virtual assistant can recognize in order to provide a response directly related to the specific search terms).
The new populated request templates can be used to train a virtual assistant, such that when the future data becomes relevant, the virtual assistant can be prepared to recognize and respond to related user requests. For example, request templates relating to movies can be populated with details for a movie that will be released at a future date (e.g., a new movie title, new actors, new director, etc.). The populated request templates based on the future movie release date can then be used to train a virtual assistant in anticipation of future user requests relating to the movie. By training a virtual assistant based on anticipated or future data, the virtual assistant can more effectively recognize and respond to user requests related to current events, and in general can more effectively anticipate user needs that change over time.
In yet another example, anticipated or future data can be used to populate candidate request templates that a virtual assistant may not yet recognize. As described above, frequently appearing user requests that may not yet be recognized can be used to identify salient candidate request templates that can be useful for training a virtual assistant. Instead of or in addition to training a virtual assistant with new candidate request templates, anticipated or future data can be used to generate populated requests templates (e.g., complete expected user utterances) based on the identified salient candidate request templates. The populated candidate request templates can then be used to train a virtual assistant to recognize anticipated user requests based on newly identified request templates. In this manner, a virtual assistant can be made more robust by adapting to new and changing user request templates as well as anticipating and preemptively adapting to accommodate expected future user needs.
Accordingly, identifying new salient request templates from live usage data and anticipating future user needs based on data relating to future events can advantageously improve virtual assistant request recognition and overall virtual assistant utility. It should be understood, however, that still many other advantages can be achieved according to the various examples discussed herein.
User device 102 can also include processor 104, which can receive user requests and process the requests in any number of ways. For example, processor 104 can cause an audio file of a spoken user request to be transmitted to server 110 through network 108. Network 108 can include any of a variety of networks, such as a cellular telephone network, WiFi network, wide area network, local area network, the Internet, or the like. In another example, processor 104 can cause a spoken user request to be transcribed into a textual request or translated into a different format useable by the virtual assistant for processing the request, and can cause the transcribed request to be transmitted to server 110 through network 108. Processor 104 can also run some or all of the instructions for providing the interface for the virtual assistant (e.g., prompting a user for a request, causing audio to be played, causing information to be displayed, etc.).
In some examples, server 110 can include a language processor for performing speech recognition. For example, server 110 can be configured to recognize a speech sequence by decoding the acoustics that represent speech sounds and using a language model to place constraints on the acoustic sequence to estimate the most likely spoken word sequence that makes up a user request. In system 100, language model database 112 can include various constraints, user request templates, interpretation likelihoods, domain boundaries, and a variety of other information to facilitate accurate speech recognition and ultimately accurate determination of a user request. The spoken word sequence can be parsed by a natural language engine (not shown) that can derive user intent (e.g., determine the functional request that a virtual assistant can process and act upon to respond to the request). In some examples, acoustic models can be trained on speech audio while language models can be trained on recognized text data to robustly estimate the likelihoods of particular n-gram sequences (e.g., parsed portions of a request). It should be understood that training a virtual assistant can include training an associated acoustic model, training an associated language model, or both.
Other aspects relating to virtual assistant technology are disclosed in the following references: U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012/0016678 for “Intelligent Automated Assistant,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference; and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012/0265528 for “Using Context Information to Facilitate Processing of Commands in a Virtual Assistant,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In some examples, speech recognition accuracy can be enhanced by training both acoustic and language models on large sets of real world usage data. As speech changes (e.g., different word choice, altered phrasing, etc.), and as new terminology emerges to describe current ideas, events, and the like, models trained on older data can become outdated. For example, models trained on only text-based data sources can miss changes over time in spoken dialogue. To improve accuracy, live usage data can be employed as part of the training for virtual assistants in general and for acoustic and language models in particular. As discussed below with reference to process 220 of
Although
It should likewise be understood that many variations are possible for a system that can be used according to the examples herein for virtual assistant request recognition. For example, although
User speech can be directed to a virtual assistant via an interface on a user device, and can include any of a variety of user requests. For example, user requests can include a command for the virtual assistant to perform a certain function (e.g., compose an email, send a text message, initiate a phone call, launch an application, play an audio file, etc.). In other examples, user requests can include a request for information (e.g., sports scores, directions, restaurant recommendations, theater schedules, weather, stocks, internet searches, encyclopedia entries, etc.). In still other examples, user requests can include dialogue directed to the virtual assistant or requests relating to the virtual assistant (e.g., statements personifying the virtual assistant, queries of the functional capabilities of the virtual assistant, statements defining preferences for virtual assistant interaction, etc.). It should be appreciated that user requests need not be limited to queries or commands, but can include any interaction between a user and the virtual assistant. It should likewise be understood that user speech and user requests of any type can be received, and the virtual assistant can be trained to provide meaningful responses to any type of user speech or request.
At block 224, the received textual representation of user speech can be compared to recognized user request templates (e.g., exemplars or use cases identifying a particular user request to which a virtual assistant is trained to respond). In some examples, recognized user request templates can form part of a language model, such as that stored in language model database 112 of
In some examples, user request templates can include variables, entities, operands, search terms, or the like that a virtual assistant can use in performing a corresponding function. For example, as illustrated in
In some examples, variables or entities can be implied in a user request. For example, another exemplary user request template could include “Locate the nearest <RESTAURANT_TYPE> restaurant.” In this example, the virtual assistant could perform a corresponding search function that incorporates both the explicitly stated restaurant type as well as the implicit variable of the user's current location to find nearby restaurants of a particular type. For example, a user can request that the virtual assistant identify the nearest Thai restaurant. In response, the virtual assistant can perform a corresponding search function that locates Thai restaurants and filters them for proximity.
Although not shown in process 220 of
In some examples, segmenting database 112 into different domains can improve speech recognition and user request interpretation. For example, words appearing in a user request can be used to narrow the field of potential user request matches to a corresponding domain or a subset of all domains. For a movie domain, for example, words like “movies,” “theater,” “showing,” “playing,” “starring,” “director,” “actor,” or the like could be used during speech recognition to narrow a template search to the movie domain. Domain segmentation can also help disambiguate user intent when, for example, entities or request terms may be confusing and difficult to accurately recognize or interpret.
Referring again to process 220 of
If a matching recognized user request template is found (e.g., the “yes” branch of block 226), a function corresponding to the recognized user request template can be performed at block 228. For example, a virtual assistant can be trained to identify movies playing near a particular location in response to the user request template “Identify movies playing in <LOCATION>.” The request template can be included in a language model associated with the virtual assistant, and the template could be identified as matching a corresponding user request, such as “Find movies playing in Sacramento, Calif.” After recognizing that the user request matches the template “Identify movies playing in <LOCATION>,” the virtual assistant can perform the corresponding function of searching for movies playing in theaters located in or near Sacramento, Calif. It should be appreciated that functions attributed to the virtual assistant can be performed by software executing on a server, a user device, and/or another device. For example, virtual assistant software executing on a server can perform the search function and send the results to the user device; virtual assistant software executing on the user device can then cause the results to be displayed, read out, or otherwise provided to the user.
If no matching recognized user request template is found (e.g., the “no” branch of block 226), candidate templates can be generated at block 230 based on the received textual representation of user speech. In some examples, candidate request templates can be generated based on various combinations of the words in a received request. In other examples, candidate request templates can be generated by removing an entity or removing different words or portions of a user request. In still other examples, candidate request templates can be generated by parsing a received request into different n-grams and forming new candidate templates from different numbers and orders of the n-grams. It should be appreciated that a received request can be maintained whole and/or broken up in a variety of ways to generate candidate request templates.
In one example, an unrecognized user request could include “Show movies playing nearby.” At block 230, various candidate request templates could be generated from such a request, such as “Show < >,” “Show < > nearby,” “Show movies < >,” “Show movies playing < >,” “Show < > playing,” “Show < > playing nearby,” “Show < > playing < >,” etc., along with the unmodified request itself. Various candidate request templates can thus be generated from a received request.
Referring again to process 220 of
Although
Referring again to process 220 of
If, however, an already-stored matching candidate request template has been found (e.g., the “yes” branch of block 234), a count associated with a matched candidate template can be incremented. Incrementing the count can reflect, for example, that a particular candidate template has once again been generated from a received and unrecognized user request.
Referring again to process 220 of
In some examples, the most frequently generated candidate template can yield a request template that corresponds to and can be responsive to a wide variety of specific user requests. For example, several candidate templates can be related and can correspond to the same or a similar function, and selecting the most frequently generated candidate template can yield a request template that satisfies a large number of potential user requests. In addition, in some examples, generating candidate request templates and tracking the frequency of receipt can be used to generate a ranked list of candidate templates similar to that illustrated in
Referring again to process 220 of
The function associated with a salient candidate template can be defined in any number of ways. In one example, a system administrator, user, or other person can define a particular function that a virtual assistant can use in responding to receipt of a candidate request template. In other examples, contextual information relating to received requests can be used to determine a desired functionality (e.g., using near-in-time requests to determine a likely desired function for an unrecognized request). Various other approaches can also be used to determine a corresponding function with which to train a virtual assistant to respond to a candidate request template.
Received data can include any of a variety of information relating to future events. For example, for an upcoming movie premier, received data can include a movie title, actor names, plot information, director names, producer names, filming locations, premier/release date, theater locations, or the like. For a restaurant opening, received data can include a restaurant name, location, business hours, head chef, owner, opening date, associated restaurants, job opportunities, or the like. For a sports game being played, received data can include team names, event location, event date, event time, ticketing information, arena information, related statistics, or the like. Thus, a wide variety of information can be received relating to a wide variety of future events, and it should be appreciated that the examples enumerated herein are not limiting of the types of data and types of future events that can be used in executing process 440.
At block 444, entity names can be extracted from the data received at block 442. In one example, received information can be parsed or categorized into recognizable entities or variables. For example, a location or address can be extracted from received data (e.g., recognized as a location or address and delineated) and designated as the location or address associated with a future event; a release date, opening date, event date, or the like can be extracted from received data (e.g., recognized as a date) and designated as a significant date associated with a future event; a person's name and any associated title, role, position, or the like can be extracted from received data and correlated with a future event; and a variety of other information can be extracted from received data and categorized. In some examples, extracted entities can be stored in a database, table, or the like that can indicate how an extracted entity name corresponds to a future event or to what variables an entity name might relate. For example, for a new movie, an actor's name can be extracted from a data feed and designated as relating to a variety of variables or entities that can appear in request templates, such as “actor,” “star,” “role,” or the like. Extracted entity names can also be stored and categorized in a variety of other ways that can be useful for subsequent virtual assistant training.
At block 446, recognized request templates can be populated or seeded with entity names, thereby generating populated request templates (e.g., particular utterances, example uses, example phrases, etc.). In one example, entity names relating to a future event can be used to populate or seed some or all related request templates in a corresponding domain (e.g., insert entity names where there are variables in request templates). For example, for a new movie, extracted entity names can be inserted into some or all of the recognized request templates in a movie domain: an extracted movie title can be used to populate any request template with a related movie title variable, such as <MOVIE_TITLE> in the template “Where is <MOVIE_TITLE> playing;” an extracted movie type can be used to populate any request template with a related movie type variable, such as <MOVIE_TYPE> in the template “Identify new <MOVIE_TYPE> movies,” an actor's name can be used to populate any request template with a related actor variable, such as <ACTOR> in the template “Identify new movies starring <ACTOR>;” and so on. In other examples, a predetermined subset of recognized request templates in a domain can be populated with new entity names.
Some example populated request templates are illustrated in
Referring again to process 440 of
Training at block 448 can be performed in a variety of ways. In some examples, populated request templates from block 446 can be stored in a database associated with a virtual assistant, such as a language model database or an acoustic model database. As illustrated in
In some examples, entity names extracted at block 444 from newly received data can be used in other ways for virtual assistant request recognition. At block 450, for example, candidate request templates can be populated with entity names in a manner similar to block 446. As discussed above, candidate request templates can include user requests that a virtual assistant may not yet recognize and to which a virtual assistant may not yet be trained to respond. At block 450, candidate request templates can be populated with new entity names to generate populated candidate request templates. As illustrated in
At block 452, a virtual assistant can be trained with populated candidate request templates in a manner similar to block 448. In some examples, a virtual assistant can be trained with both new candidate request templates and corresponding populated candidate request templates. For example, at block 240 in process 220 of
At block 562, a user query or user request can be received at a user device. A user query can be directed toward a virtual assistant and can include any command, request, question, statement, or the like. A user query can also be received in any form, including text, voice, gestures, images, or the like. At block 564, a response can be provided indicating that the virtual assistant is as yet untrained to respond to the received user query. For example, as discussed above with respect to blocks 224 and 226 of process 220, a received request may not yet be recognized by a virtual assistant, or a virtual assistant may otherwise not yet be trained to provide a response to a received query. In some examples, the user query can be transmitted to a server for processing, and the server can indicate to the user device that a trained response is unavailable. Providing a response at block 564 can include causing text to be displayed, causing audio to be played, causing text to be read out, causing an image to be displayed, or the like. It should be appreciated that the response need not be a particular message, but might include a tone, image, word, or the like that can indicate to a user that the virtual assistant is untrained to respond substantively to the particular request. In other examples, the virtual assistant can prompt the user for additional information (e.g., repeat the request, restate the request, confirm interpretation, query whether a related web search is desired, etc.).
At block 566, the user query can be transmitted to a server. In some examples, an audio file of the user query can be transmitted to a server. In other examples, contextual information relating to the user query can be transmitted to the server along with the user query (e.g., near-in-time requests, user profile information, date, time, etc.). In some examples, transmitting the user query to the server at block 566 can be done prior to providing a response at block 564 (e.g., the user query can be transmitted to a server, the server can indicate that no trained response is available, and a corresponding response can then be provided). In other examples, a user query can be transmitted to a first server for processing to determine whether a trained response is available, and can be transmitted to a second server upon determination that no trained response is available.
At block 568, the same user query can again be received at the user device. As at block 562, the user query can be received in any of a variety of ways and can again be directed to a virtual assistant associated with the device. At block 570, in contrast to the response at 564, a trained response to the user query can be provided (e.g., a response that appropriately/substantively responds to the user query, provides the requested information, performs the desired function, etc.). In some examples, the trained response to the user query can be provided by a server associated with the virtual assistant. In some instances, the virtual assistant can learn such a trained response according to process 220 of
In some examples, the steps at blocks 572, 574, and 576 can be performed to train the virtual assistant to recognize and provide a response to the user query received at block 562, such that the virtual assistant is able to provide a trained response at block 570 after receiving the same user query again at block 568. At block 572, a plurality of request templates can be generated based on the user query received at block 562. For example, the plurality of request templates can be generated in a similar manner as described above with reference to block 230 of process 220 in
One or more of the functions described above relating to virtual assistant request recognition can be performed by a system similar or identical to system 600 shown in
The instructions can also be propagated within any transport medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device, such as a computer-based system, processor-containing system, or other system that can fetch the instructions from the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device and execute the instructions. In the context of this document, a “transport medium” can be any medium that can communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The transport medium can include, but is not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, or infrared wired or wireless propagation medium.
System 600 can further include touch sensitive display 607 coupled to processor 605. Touch sensitive display 607 can be configured for users to interact with a virtual assistant along with other components (e.g., a microphone).
It is to be understood that the system is not limited to the components and configuration of
Therefore, according to the above, some examples of the disclosure are directed to a method for request recognition for a virtual assistant, the method comprising: receiving a textual representation of user speech; generating a plurality of request templates based on the textual representation; associating a count with a request template of the plurality of request templates based on a number of times the request template is received; and in response to a determination that the count is more than a predetermined amount, generating a notification including the request template. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples a method for request recognition for a virtual assistant can further comprise: in response to a determination that the count is more than the predetermined amount, training a language model with the request template, the language model associated with the virtual assistant. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples a method for request recognition for a virtual assistant can further comprise: in response to a determination that the count is more than the predetermined amount, generating a plurality of populated templates, each of the plurality of populated templates comprising one of the plurality of generated request templates populated with an entity. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples a method for request recognition for a virtual assistant can further comprise: training a language model with the plurality of populated templates. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples each of the generated plurality of request templates comprises at least one word or phrase that indicates a language domain and at least one entity related to the language domain. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples a method for request recognition for a virtual assistant can further comprise: receiving contextual data relating to the textual representation of user speech; wherein the plurality of request templates is generated based on the textual representation and the contextual data relating to the textual representation.
According to the above, other examples of the disclosure are directed to a system for request recognition for a virtual assistant, the system comprising: a memory; and a processor capable of: receiving a textual representation of user speech; generating a plurality of request templates based on the textual representation; associating a count with a request template of the plurality of request templates based on a number of times the request template is received; and in response to a determination that the count is more than a predetermined amount, generating a notification including the request template.
According to the above, other examples of the disclosure are directed to a method for facilitating user interactions with a virtual assistant associated with a user device, the method comprising: receiving a first user query at the user device; providing a response indicating that the virtual assistant is untrained to respond to the first user query; transmitting the first user query to a server associated with the virtual assistant; receiving a second user query at the user device, wherein the second user query is the same as the first user query; and in response to receiving the second user query, providing a trained response. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples the trained response is determined by: generating a plurality of request templates based on the first user query; associating a count with a request template of the plurality of request templates based on a number of times the request template is received; and in response to a determination that the count is more than a predetermined amount, generating the trained response. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples the trained response comprises a search result associated with the second user query.
According to the above, other examples of the disclosure are directed to a method for request recognition for a virtual assistant, the method comprising: receiving data comprising a reference to a future event; extracting an entity name from the received data, wherein the entity name describes the future event; generating a plurality of populated request templates based on the extracted entity name; and training a language model of the virtual assistant with the plurality of populated request templates. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples generating the plurality of populated request templates based on the extracted entity name comprises: inserting the extracted entity name into a plurality of request templates recognizable by the virtual assistant. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples a method for request recognition further comprises: inserting the extracted entity name into a first request template recognizable by the virtual assistant; receiving a second request template as yet unrecognized by the virtual assistant; and generating a candidate populated request template based on the extracted entity name by inserting the extracted entity name into the second request template. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples a method for request recognition further comprises: training the language model of the virtual assistant with the candidate populated request template.
According to the above, other examples of the disclosure are directed to a method for request recognition for a virtual assistant, the method comprising: receiving a textual transcription of user speech; comparing the textual transcription to one or more first request templates recognizable by the virtual assistant; in response to a first match between the textual transcription and the first request template being found, causing an action to be performed corresponding to the first match; and in response to no first match being found: generating a plurality of second request templates based on the textual transcription; comparing each of the plurality of second request templates to one or more third request templates as yet unrecognized by the virtual assistant; incrementing a count associated with a second request template in response to a second match between the second request template and a third request template being found; and storing a second request template in response to a matching third request template not being found. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples a method for request recognition further comprises: in response to a determination that the incremented count is more than a predetermined threshold, generating a notification including the second request template. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples a method for request recognition further comprises: in response to no first match being found, training a language model with at least one of the plurality of generated second request templates. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples a method for request recognition further comprises: in response to no first match being found, generating a plurality of populated request templates, each of the plurality of populated request templates comprising one of the plurality of generated second request templates populated with an entity; and training a language model with the plurality of populated request templates. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples the action to be performed comprises causing a search result associated with the first match to be displayed. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples each of the plurality of second request templates comprises at least one word or phrase that indicates a language domain. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples a method for request recognition further comprises: receiving contextual data relating to the textual transcription of user speech; wherein the plurality of second request templates is generated based on the textual transcription and the contextual data relating to the textual transcription.
According to the above, other examples of the disclosure are directed to a system for request recognition for a virtual assistant, the system comprising: a memory; and a processor capable of: receiving a textual transcription of user speech; comparing the textual transcription to one or more first request templates recognizable by the virtual assistant; in response to a first match between the textual transcription and the first request template being found, causing an action to be performed corresponding to the first match; and in response to no first match being found: generating a plurality of second request templates based on the textual transcription; comparing each of the plurality of second request templates to one or more third request templates as yet unrecognized by the virtual assistant; incrementing a count associated with a second request template in response to a second match between the second request template and a third request template being found; and storing a second request template in response to a matching third request template not being found. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples the processor is further capable of: in response to a determination that the incremented count is more than a predetermined threshold, generating a notification including the second request template. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples the processor is further capable of: in response to no first match being found, training a language model with at least one of the plurality of generated second request templates. Additionally or alternatively to one or more of the examples disclosed above, in some examples the processor is further capable of: in response to no first match being found, generating a plurality of populated request templates, each of the plurality of populated request templates comprising one of the plurality of generated second request templates populated with an entity; and training a language model with the plurality of populated request templates.
Although examples have been fully described with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be noted that various changes and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications are to be understood as being included within the scope of the various examples as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3704345 | Coker et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3828132 | Flanagan et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3979557 | Schulman et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4278838 | Antonov | Jul 1981 | A |
4282405 | Taguchi | Aug 1981 | A |
4310721 | Manley et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4348553 | Baker et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4653021 | Takagi | Mar 1987 | A |
4688195 | Thompson et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4692941 | Jacks et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4718094 | Bahl et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4724542 | Williford | Feb 1988 | A |
4726065 | Froessl | Feb 1988 | A |
4727354 | Lindsay | Feb 1988 | A |
4776016 | Hansen | Oct 1988 | A |
4783807 | Marley | Nov 1988 | A |
4811243 | Racine | Mar 1989 | A |
4819271 | Bahl et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4827518 | Feustel et al. | May 1989 | A |
4827520 | Zeinstra | May 1989 | A |
4829576 | Porter | May 1989 | A |
4833712 | Bahl et al. | May 1989 | A |
4839853 | Deerwester et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4852168 | Sprague | Jul 1989 | A |
4862504 | Nomura | Aug 1989 | A |
4878230 | Murakami et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4903305 | Gillick et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4905163 | Garber et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4914586 | Swinehart et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4914590 | Loatman et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4944013 | Gouvianakis et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4955047 | Morganstein et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4965763 | Zamora | Oct 1990 | A |
4974191 | Amirghodsi et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4977598 | Doddington et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4992972 | Brooks et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5010574 | Wang | Apr 1991 | A |
5020112 | Chou | May 1991 | A |
5021971 | Lindsay | Jun 1991 | A |
5022081 | Hirose et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5027406 | Roberts et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5031217 | Nishimura | Jul 1991 | A |
5032989 | Tornetta | Jul 1991 | A |
5040218 | Vitale et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5047617 | Shepard et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5057915 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1991 | A |
5072452 | Brown et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5091945 | Kleijn | Feb 1992 | A |
5127053 | Koch | Jun 1992 | A |
5127055 | Larkey | Jun 1992 | A |
5128672 | Kaehler | Jul 1992 | A |
5133011 | McKiel, Jr. | Jul 1992 | A |
5142584 | Ozawa | Aug 1992 | A |
5164900 | Bernath | Nov 1992 | A |
5165007 | Bahl et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5179627 | Sweet et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5179652 | Rozmanith et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5194950 | Murakami et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197005 | Shwartz et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199077 | Wilcox et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202952 | Gillick et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5208862 | Ozawa | May 1993 | A |
5216747 | Hardwick et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220639 | Lee | Jun 1993 | A |
5220657 | Bly et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222146 | Bahl et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230036 | Akamine et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235680 | Bijnagte | Aug 1993 | A |
5267345 | Brown et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268990 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282265 | Rohra Suda et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
RE34562 | Murakami et al. | Mar 1994 | E |
5291286 | Murakami et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293448 | Honda | Mar 1994 | A |
5293452 | Picone et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297170 | Eyuboglu et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301109 | Landauer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303406 | Hansen et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309359 | Katz et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317507 | Gallant | May 1994 | A |
5317647 | Pagallo | May 1994 | A |
5325297 | Bird et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5325298 | Gallant | Jun 1994 | A |
5327498 | Hamon | Jul 1994 | A |
5333236 | Bahl et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333275 | Wheatley et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5345536 | Hoshimi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349645 | Zhao | Sep 1994 | A |
5353377 | Kuroda et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5377301 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5384892 | Strong | Jan 1995 | A |
5384893 | Hutchins | Jan 1995 | A |
5386494 | White | Jan 1995 | A |
5386556 | Hedin et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390279 | Strong | Feb 1995 | A |
5396625 | Parkes | Mar 1995 | A |
5400434 | Pearson | Mar 1995 | A |
5404295 | Katz et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412756 | Bauman et al. | May 1995 | A |
5412804 | Krishna | May 1995 | A |
5412806 | Du et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418951 | Damashek | May 1995 | A |
5424947 | Nagao et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5434777 | Luciw | Jul 1995 | A |
5444823 | Nguyen | Aug 1995 | A |
5455888 | Iyengar et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469529 | Bimbot et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471611 | McGregor | Nov 1995 | A |
5475587 | Anick et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479488 | Lennig et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5491772 | Hardwick et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493677 | Balogh et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495604 | Harding et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5502790 | Yi | Mar 1996 | A |
5502791 | Nishimura et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5515475 | Gupta et al. | May 1996 | A |
5536902 | Serra et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537618 | Boulton et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5574823 | Hassanein et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577241 | Spencer | Nov 1996 | A |
5578808 | Taylor | Nov 1996 | A |
5579436 | Chou et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581655 | Cohen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584024 | Shwartz | Dec 1996 | A |
5596676 | Swaminathan et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596994 | Bro | Jan 1997 | A |
5608624 | Luciw | Mar 1997 | A |
5613036 | Strong | Mar 1997 | A |
5617507 | Lee et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619694 | Shimazu | Apr 1997 | A |
5621859 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621903 | Luciw et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642464 | Yue et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642519 | Martin | Jun 1997 | A |
5644727 | Atkins | Jul 1997 | A |
5664055 | Kroon | Sep 1997 | A |
5675819 | Schuetze | Oct 1997 | A |
5682539 | Conrad et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687077 | Gough, Jr. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696962 | Kupiec | Dec 1997 | A |
5701400 | Amado | Dec 1997 | A |
5706442 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710886 | Christensen et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712957 | Waibel et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715468 | Budzinski | Feb 1998 | A |
5721827 | Logan et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5727950 | Cook et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729694 | Holzrichter et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732216 | Logan et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732390 | Katayanagi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734791 | Acero et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737734 | Schultz | Apr 1998 | A |
5748974 | Johnson | May 1998 | A |
5749081 | Whiteis | May 1998 | A |
5759101 | Von Kohorn | Jun 1998 | A |
5790978 | Olive et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794050 | Dahlgren et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794182 | Manduchi et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794237 | Gore, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799276 | Komissarchik et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5822743 | Gupta et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825881 | Colvin, Sr. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826261 | Spencer | Oct 1998 | A |
5828999 | Bellegarda et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835893 | Ushioda | Nov 1998 | A |
5839106 | Bellegarda | Nov 1998 | A |
5845255 | Mayaud | Dec 1998 | A |
5857184 | Lynch | Jan 1999 | A |
5860063 | Gorin et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862233 | Poletti | Jan 1999 | A |
5864806 | Mokbel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864844 | James et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867799 | Lang et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873056 | Liddy et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875437 | Atkins | Feb 1999 | A |
5884323 | Hawkins et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5895464 | Bhandari et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895466 | Goldberg et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899972 | Miyazawa et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913193 | Huang et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915249 | Spencer | Jun 1999 | A |
5930769 | Rose | Jul 1999 | A |
5933822 | Braden-Harder et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936926 | Yokouchi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940811 | Norris | Aug 1999 | A |
5941944 | Messerly | Aug 1999 | A |
5943670 | Prager | Aug 1999 | A |
5948040 | DeLorme et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956699 | Wong et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960394 | Gould et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960422 | Prasad | Sep 1999 | A |
5963924 | Williams et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966126 | Szabo | Oct 1999 | A |
5970474 | LeRoy et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974146 | Randle et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982891 | Ginter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987132 | Rowney | Nov 1999 | A |
5987140 | Rowney et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987404 | Della Pietra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987440 | O'Neil et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999908 | Abelow | Dec 1999 | A |
6016471 | Kuhn et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023684 | Pearson | Feb 2000 | A |
6024288 | Gottlich et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026345 | Shah et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026375 | Hall et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026388 | Liddy et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026393 | Gupta et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029132 | Kuhn et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038533 | Buchsbaum et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052656 | Suda et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055514 | Wren | Apr 2000 | A |
6055531 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064960 | Bellegarda et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070139 | Miyazawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070147 | Harms et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076051 | Messerly et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076088 | Paik et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078914 | Redfern | Jun 2000 | A |
6081750 | Hoffberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081774 | de Hita et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088731 | Kiraly et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094649 | Bowen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6105865 | Hardesty | Aug 2000 | A |
6108627 | Sabourin | Aug 2000 | A |
6119101 | Peckover | Sep 2000 | A |
6122616 | Henton | Sep 2000 | A |
6125356 | Brockman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6144938 | Surace et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6173261 | Arai et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173279 | Levin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188999 | Moody | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195641 | Loring et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205456 | Nakao | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208971 | Bellegarda et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233559 | Balakrishnan | May 2001 | B1 |
6233578 | Machihara et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246981 | Papineni et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260024 | Shkedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266637 | Donovan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275824 | O'Flaherty et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285786 | Seni et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308149 | Gaussier et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311189 | deVries et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317594 | Gossman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317707 | Bangalore | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317831 | King | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321092 | Fitch et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334103 | Surace et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6356854 | Schubert et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356905 | Gershman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366883 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6366884 | Bellegarda et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6421672 | McAllister et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434524 | Weber | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446076 | Burkey et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449620 | Draper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453281 | Walters et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453292 | Ramaswamy et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6460029 | Fries et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466654 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477488 | Bellegarda | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487534 | Thelen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499013 | Weber | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501937 | Ho et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505158 | Conkie | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505175 | Silverman et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505183 | Loofbourrow et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510417 | Woods et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513063 | Julia et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519565 | Clements et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523061 | Halverson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523172 | Martinez-Guerra et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526382 | Yuschik | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526395 | Morris | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532444 | Weber | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532446 | King | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546388 | Edlund et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553344 | Bellegarda et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556983 | Altschuler et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584464 | Warthen | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6598039 | Livowsky | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601026 | Appelt et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601234 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604059 | Strubbe et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615172 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615175 | Gazdzinski | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6615220 | Austin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625583 | Silverman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631346 | Karaorman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633846 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647260 | Dusse et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650735 | Burton et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654740 | Tokuda et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665639 | Mozer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665640 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665641 | Coorman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684187 | Conkie | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691064 | Vroman | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691111 | Lazaridis et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691151 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697780 | Beutnagel et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697824 | Bowman-Amuah | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701294 | Ball et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711585 | Cooperman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718324 | Edlund et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6721706 | Strubbe | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721728 | McGreevy | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728679 | Strubbe | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731307 | Strubbe | May 2004 | B1 |
6735632 | Kiraly et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742021 | Halverson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6757362 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757718 | Halverson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766320 | Wang et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6778951 | Contractor | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778952 | Bellegarda | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778962 | Kasai et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778970 | Au | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792082 | Levine | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795808 | Strubbe | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807574 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810379 | Vermeulen et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6813491 | McKinney | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829603 | Chai et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6832194 | Mozer et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842767 | Partovi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847966 | Sommer et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847979 | Allemang et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851115 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859931 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6895380 | Sepe, Jr. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895558 | Loveland | May 2005 | B1 |
6901399 | Corston et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6912499 | Sabourin et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6924828 | Hirsch | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6928614 | Everhart | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931384 | Horvitz et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934684 | Alpdemir et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937975 | Elworthy | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6937986 | Denenberg et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6964023 | Maes et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980949 | Ford | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980955 | Okutani et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985865 | Packingham et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6988071 | Gazdzinski | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996531 | Korall et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999927 | Mozer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020685 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7024363 | Comerford et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7027974 | Busch et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7036128 | Julia et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7050977 | Bennett | May 2006 | B1 |
7058569 | Coorman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062428 | Hogenhout et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069560 | Cheyer et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7092887 | Mozer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092928 | Elad et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7093693 | Gazdzinski | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7127046 | Smith et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7127403 | Saylor et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7136710 | Hoffberg et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7137126 | Coffman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139714 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139722 | Perrella et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152070 | Musick et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7177798 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197460 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200559 | Wang | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203646 | Bennett | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216073 | Lavi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7216080 | Tsiao et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225125 | Bennett et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7233790 | Kjellberg et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233904 | Luisi | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7266496 | Wang et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277854 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290039 | Lisitsa et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7299033 | Kjellberg et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310600 | Garner et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7324947 | Jordan et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7349953 | Lisitsa et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7376556 | Bennett | May 2008 | B2 |
7376645 | Bernard | May 2008 | B2 |
7379874 | Schmid et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7386449 | Sun et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389224 | Elworthy | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7392185 | Bennett | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398209 | Kennewick et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7403938 | Harrison et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409337 | Potter et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7415100 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418392 | Mozer et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7426467 | Nashida et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427024 | Gazdzinski et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7447635 | Konopka et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7454351 | Jeschke et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467087 | Gillick et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7475010 | Chao | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483894 | Cao | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487089 | Mozer | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496498 | Chu et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496512 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502738 | Kennewick et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7508373 | Lin et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7522927 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7523108 | Cao | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526466 | Au | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529671 | Rockenbeck et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7529676 | Koyama | May 2009 | B2 |
7539656 | Fratkina et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7546382 | Healey et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548895 | Pulsipher | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552055 | Lecoeuche | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555431 | Bennett | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558730 | Davis et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7571106 | Cao et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7599918 | Shen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620549 | Di Cristo et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624007 | Bennett | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634409 | Kennewick et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636657 | Ju et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640160 | Di Cristo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647225 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657424 | Bennett | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664638 | Cooper et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672841 | Bennett | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7676026 | Baxter, Jr. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7684985 | Dominach et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693715 | Hwang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7693720 | Kennewick et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698131 | Bennett | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702500 | Blaedow | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702508 | Bennett | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707027 | Balchandran et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707032 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707267 | Lisitsa et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711565 | Gazdzinski | May 2010 | B1 |
7711672 | Au | May 2010 | B2 |
7716056 | Weng et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720674 | Kaiser et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720683 | Vermeulen et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7721301 | Wong et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725307 | Bennett | May 2010 | B2 |
7725318 | Gavalda et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725320 | Bennett | May 2010 | B2 |
7725321 | Bennett | May 2010 | B2 |
7729904 | Bennett | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7729916 | Coffman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734461 | Kwak et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747616 | Yamada et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752152 | Paek et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756868 | Lee | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774204 | Mozer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783486 | Rosser et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801729 | Mozer | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809570 | Kennewick et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7809610 | Cao | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818176 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822608 | Cross, Jr. et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826945 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831426 | Bennett | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840400 | Lavi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840447 | Kleinrock et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853574 | Kraenzel et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853664 | Wang et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7873519 | Bennett | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873654 | Bernard | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881936 | Longe et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890652 | Bull et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7912702 | Bennett | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917367 | Di Cristo et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917497 | Harrison et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920678 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7925525 | Chin | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930168 | Weng et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7949529 | Weider et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949534 | Davis et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7974844 | Sumita | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7974972 | Cao | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983915 | Knight et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983917 | Kennewick et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983997 | Allen et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7986431 | Emori et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987151 | Schott et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996228 | Miller et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000453 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005679 | Jordan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015006 | Kennewick et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024195 | Mozer et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032383 | Bhardwaj et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8036901 | Mozer | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041570 | Mirkovic et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041611 | Kleinrock et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046374 | Bromwich | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8055708 | Chitsaz et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065155 | Gazdzinski | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8065156 | Gazdzinski | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069046 | Kennewick et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073681 | Baldwin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8078473 | Gazdzinski | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8082153 | Coffman et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8095364 | Longe et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099289 | Mozer et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8107401 | John et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8112275 | Kennewick et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8112280 | Lu | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8117037 | Gazdzinski | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131557 | Davis et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140335 | Kennewick et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8165886 | Gagnon et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8166019 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8190359 | Bourne | May 2012 | B2 |
8195467 | Mozer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204238 | Mozer | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8205788 | Gazdzinski et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8219407 | Roy et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8285551 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8285553 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290778 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290781 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296146 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296153 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296383 | Lindahl | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301456 | Gazdzinski | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311834 | Gazdzinski | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8370158 | Gazdzinski | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371503 | Gazdzinski | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8374871 | Ehsani | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8447612 | Gazdzinski | May 2013 | B2 |
8626681 | Jurca | Jan 2014 | B1 |
9330659 | Ju | May 2016 | B2 |
20010047264 | Roundtree | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010584 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032564 | Ehsani et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035474 | Alpdemir | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046025 | Hain | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069063 | Buchner et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077817 | Atal | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083068 | Quass | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103641 | Kuo et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116185 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116189 | Yeh et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020164000 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198714 | Zhou | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030088414 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097210 | Horst et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030135740 | Talmor et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040135701 | Yasuda et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040199387 | Wang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220798 | Chi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236778 | Junqua et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249637 | Baker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002507 | Timmins et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055403 | Brittan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071332 | Ortega et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080625 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091118 | Fano | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102614 | Brockett et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108001 | Aarskog | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114124 | Liu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119897 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143972 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165607 | Di Fabbrizio et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182629 | Coorman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050196733 | Budra et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050273626 | Pearson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288936 | Busayapongchai et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060018492 | Chiu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060106592 | Brockett et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106594 | Brockett et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106595 | Brockett et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117002 | Swen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122834 | Bennett | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143007 | Koh et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060217967 | Goertzen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235700 | Wong et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070041361 | Iso-Sipila | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055529 | Kanevsky et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058832 | Hug et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088556 | Andrew | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100790 | Cheyer | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106674 | Agrawal et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118377 | Badino et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135949 | Snover et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070174188 | Fish | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185917 | Prahlad et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070282595 | Tunning et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015864 | Ross et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021708 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034032 | Healey et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052063 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082332 | Mallett et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082338 | O'Neil et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080120112 | Jordan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129520 | Lee | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140416 | Shostak | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140657 | Azvine et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080221903 | Kanevsky et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228496 | Yu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247519 | Abella et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249770 | Kim et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256613 | Grover | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300878 | Bennett | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319763 | Di Fabbrizio et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006100 | Badger et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006343 | Platt et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018835 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030800 | Grois | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090055179 | Cho et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090058823 | Kocienda | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076796 | Daraselia | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077165 | Rhodes et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100049 | Cao | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112677 | Rhett | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090150156 | Kennewick et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157401 | Bennett | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164441 | Cheyer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171664 | Kennewick et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204409 | Mozer et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090287583 | Holmes | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290718 | Kahn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299745 | Kennewick et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299849 | Cao et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307162 | Bui et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005081 | Bennett | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023320 | Di Cristo et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036660 | Bennett | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042400 | Block et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057435 | Kent | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088020 | Sano et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088100 | Lindahl | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131273 | Aley-Raz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138215 | Williams | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145700 | Kennewick et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100204986 | Kennewick et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217604 | Baldwin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100228540 | Bennett | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235341 | Bennett | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257160 | Cao | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262599 | Nitz | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277579 | Cho et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100278320 | Arsenault et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100280983 | Cho et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286985 | Kennewick et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299142 | Freeman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312547 | Van Os | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318576 | Kim | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332235 | David | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332348 | Cao | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110047072 | Ciurea | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060807 | Martin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082688 | Kim et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110112827 | Kennewick et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112921 | Kennewick et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119049 | Ylonen | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125540 | Jang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130958 | Stahl et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110131036 | DiCristo et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110131045 | Cristo et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110143811 | Rodriguez | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144999 | Jang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161076 | Davis et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161309 | Lung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175810 | Markovic et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184730 | LeBeau et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110218855 | Cao et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231182 | Weider et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231188 | Kennewick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238407 | Kent | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264643 | Cao | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279368 | Klein et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110298585 | Barry | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306426 | Novak et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314003 | Ju | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120002820 | Leichter | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016678 | Gruber | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120020490 | Leichter | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022787 | LeBeau et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022857 | Baldwin et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022860 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022868 | LeBeau et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022869 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022870 | Kristjansson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022874 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022876 | LeBeau et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023088 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120034904 | LeBeau et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035908 | LeBeau et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035924 | Jitkoff et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035931 | LeBeau et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035932 | Jitkoff et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120042343 | Laligand et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120137367 | Dupont et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120173464 | Tur et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120265528 | Gruber | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271676 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120311583 | Gruber et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330661 | Lindahl | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006638 | Lindahl | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130110518 | Gruber et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110520 | Cheyer et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130325979 | Mansfield | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140244254 | Ju | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150142851 | Gupta | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
681573 | Apr 1993 | CH |
3837590 | May 1990 | DE |
19841541 | Dec 2007 | DE |
0138061 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0218859 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0262938 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0138061 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0293259 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0299572 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0313975 | May 1989 | EP |
0314908 | May 1989 | EP |
0327408 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0389271 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0411675 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0559349 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0570660 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0863453 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0559349 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1229496 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1245023 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2109295 | Oct 2009 | EP |
2293667 | Apr 1996 | GB |
6-19965 | Jan 1994 | JP |
2001-125896 | May 2001 | JP |
2002-24212 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003-517158 | May 2003 | JP |
2009-36999 | Feb 2009 | JP |
10-0757496 | Sep 2007 | KR |
10-0776800 | Nov 2007 | KR |
10-0801227 | Feb 2008 | KR |
10-0810500 | Mar 2008 | KR |
10-2008-0109322 | Dec 2008 | KR |
10-2009-0086805 | Aug 2009 | KR |
10-0920267 | Oct 2009 | KR |
10-2010-0119519 | Nov 2010 | KR |
10-1032792 | May 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0113414 | Oct 2011 | KR |
1995002221 | Jan 1995 | WO |
1997026612 | Jul 1997 | WO |
1998041956 | Sep 1998 | WO |
1999001834 | Jan 1999 | WO |
1999008238 | Feb 1999 | WO |
1999056227 | Nov 1999 | WO |
2000060435 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2000060435 | Apr 2001 | WO |
2002073603 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2006129967 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2008085742 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008109835 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2010075623 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2011088053 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hermansky, H., “Perceptual Linear Predictive (PLP) Analysis of Speech”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 87, No. 4, Apr. 1990, pp. 1738-1752. |
Hermansky, H., “Recognition of Speech in Additive and Convolutional Noise Based on Rasta Spectral Processing”, In proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP'93), Apr. 27-30, 1993, pp. II-83-II-86. |
Hirschman et al., “Multi-Site Data Collection and Evaluation in Spoken Language Understanding”, Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology, 1993, pp. 19-24. |
Hobbs et al., “Fastus: A System for Extracting Information from Natural-Language Text”, SRI International, Technical Note 519, Nov. 19, 1992, 26 pages. |
Hobbs et al., “Fastus: Extracting Information from Natural-Language Texts”, SRI International, 1992, pp. 1-22. |
Hobbs, Jerry R., “Sublanguage and Knowledge”, SRI International, Technical Note 329, Jun. 1984, 30 pages. |
Hodjat et al., “Iterative Statistical Language Model Generation for Use with an Agent-Oriented Natural Language Interface”, Proceedings of HCI International, vol. 4, Jun. 22-27, 2003, pp. 1422-1426. |
Hoehfeld et al., “Learning with Limited Numerical Precision Using the Cascade-Correlation Algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 3, No. 4, Jul. 1992, 18 pages. |
Holmes, J. N., “Speech Synthesis and Recognition-Stochastic Models for Word Recognition”, Published by Chapman & Hall, London, ISBN 0 412 534304, 1998, 7 pages. |
Hon et al., “CMU Robust Vocabulary-Independent Speech Recognition System”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-91), Apr. 14-17, 1991, pp. 889-892. |
Huang et al., “The SPHINX-II Speech Recognition System: An Overview”, Computer, Speech and Language, Jan. 15, 1992, pp. 1-12. |
Issar et al., “CMU's Robust Spoken Language Understanding System”, Proceedings of Eurospeech, 1993, 4 pages. |
Issar, Sunil, “Estimation of Language Models for New Spoken Language Applications”, Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Spoken language Processing, Oct. 3-6, 1996, 4 pages. |
Jacobs et al., “Scisor: Extracting Information from On-Line News”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 33, No. 11, Nov. 1990, pp. 88-97. |
Janas, Jurgen M., “The Semantics-Based Natural Language Interface to Relational Databases”, Chapter 6, Cooperative Interfaces to Information Systems, 1986, pp. 143-188. |
Jelinek, F., “Self-Organized Language Modeling for Speech Recognition,”, Readings in Speech Recognition, edited by Alex Waibel and Kai-Fu Lee, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., ISBN: 1-55860-124-4, May 15, 1990, 63 pages. |
Jennings et al., “A Personal News Service Based on a User Model Neural Network”, IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, vol. E75-D, No. 2, Tokyo, JP, Mar. 1992, pp. 198-209. |
Ji et al., “A Method for Chinese Syllables Recognition based upon Sub-syllable Hidden Markov Model”, 1994 International Symposium on Speech, Image Processing and Neural Networks, Hong Kong, Apr. 13-16, 1994, pp. 730-733. |
Johnson, Julia A., “A Data Management Strategy for Transportable Natural Language Interfaces”, Doctoral thesis submitted to the Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Canada, Jun. 1989, 285 pages. |
Jones, J., “Speech Recognition for Cyclone”, Apple Computer, Inc., E.R.S.Revision 2.9, Sep. 10, 1992, 93 pages. |
Julia et al., “http://www.speech.sri.com/demos/atis.html”, Proceedings of AAAI, Spring Symposium, 1997, 5 pages. |
Julia et al., “Un editeur interactif de tableaux dessines a main levee (An Interactive Editor for Hand-Sketched Tables)”, Traitement du Signal, vol. 12, No. 6, 1995, pp. 619-626. |
Kahn et al., “CoABS Grid Scalability Experiments”, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 7, 2003, pp. 171-178. |
Kamel et al., “A Graph Based Knowledge Retrieval System”, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1990, pp. 269-275. |
Karp, P. D., “A Generic Knowledge-Base Access Protocol”, <http://lecture.cs.buu.ac.th/-f50353/Document/gfp.pdf>, May 12, 1994, 66 pages. |
Kats et al., “Exploiting Lexical Regularities in Designing Natural Language Systems”, In the Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1988, pp. 1-22. |
Katz et al., “REXTOR: A System for Generating Relations from Natural Language”, In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval (NLP&IR), Oct. 2000, 11 pages. |
Katz, Boris, “A Three-Step Procedure for Language Generation”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, A.I. Memo No. 599, Dec. 1980, pp. 1-40. |
Katz, Boris, “Annotating the World Wide Web Using Natural Language”, In Proceedings of the 5th RIAO Conference on Computer Assisted Information Searching on the Internet, 1997, 7 pages. |
Katz, Boris, “Using English for Indexing and Retrieving”, Proceedings of the 1st RIAO Conference on User-Oriented Content-Based Text and Image Handling, 1988, pp. 314-332. |
Katz, Slava. M., “Estimation of Probabilities from Sparse Data for the Language Model Component of a Speech Recognizer”, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-35, No. 3, Mar. 1987, 3 pages. |
Kickstarter, “Ivee Sleek: Wi-Fi Voice-Activated Assistant”, available online at <https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ivee/ivee-sleek-wi-fi-voice-activated-assistant> retrived from internet on Feb. 10, 2014, 13 pages. |
Kitano, H., “ϕDM-Dialog: An Experimental Speech-to-Speech Dialog Translation System”, Computer, vol. 24, No. 6, Jun. 1991, 13 pages. |
Klabbers et al., “Reducing Audible Spectral Discontinuities”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 9, No. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 39-51. |
Klatt Dennis H., “Linguistic Uses of Segmental Duration in English: Acoustic and Perpetual Evidence”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 59, No. 5, May 1976, pp. 1208-1221. |
Knownav, “Knowledge Navigator”, YouTube Video available at <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRH8eimU_20>, Apr. 29, 2008, 1 page. |
Kominek et al., “Impact of Durational Outlier Removal from Unit Selection Catalogs”, 5th ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop, Jun. 14-16, 2004, 6 pages. |
Konolige, Kurt, “A Framework for a Portable Natural-Language Interface to Large Data Bases”, SRI International, Technical Note 197, Oct. 12, 1979, 54 pages. |
Kubala et al., “Speaker Adaptation from a Speaker-Independent Training Corpus”, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'90), Apr. 3-6, 1990, 4 pages. |
Kubala et al., “The Hub and Spoke Paradigm for CSR Evaluation”, Proceedings of the Spoken Language Technology Workshop, Mar. 6-8, 1994, 9 pages. |
Laird et al., “SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence”, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, 1987, pp. 1-64. |
Langly et al., “A Design for the ICARUS Architechture”, SIGART Bulletin, vol. 2, No. 4, 1991, pp. 104-109. |
Larks, “Intelligent Software Agents”, Available Online at <http://www.cs.cmu.edu/˜softagents/larks.html> retrieved on Mar. 15, 2013, 2006, 2 pages. |
Lee et al., “A Real-Time Mandarin Dictation Machine for Chinese Language with Unlimited Texts and Very Large Vocabulary”, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 1, Apr. 3-6, 1990, 5 pages. |
Lee et al., “Golden Mandarin(II)—An Improved Single-Chip Real-Time Mandarin Dictation Machine for Chinese Language with Very Large Vocabulary”, 0-7803-0946-4/93 © 19931EEE, 1993, 4 pages. |
Lee et al., “Golden Mandarin(II)—An Intelligent Mandarin Dictation Machine for Chinese Character Input with Adaptation/Learning Functions”, International Symposium on Speech, Image Processing and Neural Networks, Hong Kong, Apr. 13-16, 1994, 5 pages. |
Lee et al., “System Description of Golden Mandarin (I) Voice Input for Unlimited Chinese Characters”, International Conference on Computer Processing of Chinese & Oriental Languages, vol. 5, Nos. 3 & 4, Nov. 1991, 16 pages. |
Lee, K. F., “Large-Vocabulary Speaker-Independent Continuous Speech Recognition: The SPHINX System”, Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Apr. 18, 1988, 195 pages. |
Lemon et al., “Multithreaded Context for Robust Conversational Interfaces: Context-Sensitive Speech Recognition and Interpretation of Corrective Fragments”, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 11, No. 3, Sep. 2004, pp. 241-267. |
Leong et al., “CASIS: A Context-Aware Speech Interface System”, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent user Interfaces, San Diego, California, Jan. 9-12, 2005, pp. 231-238. |
Grosz et al., “Research on Natural-Language Processing at SRI”, SRI International Technical Note 257, Nov. 1981, 21 pages. |
Grosz et al., “TEAM: An Experiment in the Design of Transportable Natural-Language Interfaces”, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32, 1987, pp. 173-243. |
Grosz, Barbara J., “Team: A Transportable Natural-Language Interface System”, Proceedings of the First Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 1983, pp. 39-45. |
Gruber et al., “An Ontology for Engineering Mathematics”, Fourth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Available at <http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/papers/engmath.html>, 1994, pp. 1-22. |
Gruber et al., “Generative Design Rationale: Beyond the Record and Replay Paradigm”, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Technical Report KSL 92-59, Dec. 1991, Updated Feb. 1993, 24 pages. |
Gruber et al., “Machine-Generated Explanations of Engineering Models: A Compositional Modeling Approach”, In Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1993, 7 pages. |
Gruber et al., “NIKE: A National Infrastructure for Knowledge Exchange”, A Whitepaper Advocating and ATP Initiative on Technologies for Lifelong Learning, Oct. 1994, pp. 1-10. |
Gruber et al., “Toward a Knowledge Medium for Collaborative Product Development”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Design, Jun. 22-25, 1992, pp. 1-19. |
Gruber et al., “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications”, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Technical Report KSL 92-71, Sep. 1992, Revised Apr. 1993, 27 pages. |
Gruber, Thomas R., “Automated Knowledge Acquisition for Strategic Knowledge”, Machine Learning, vol. 4, 1989, pp. 293-336. |
Gruber, Thomas R., Interactive Acquisition of Justifications: Learning “Why” by Being Told “What”, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Technical Report KSL 91-17, Original Oct. 1990, Revised Feb. 1991, pp. 1-23. |
Gruber, Thomas R., “Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing”, In International Journal Human-Computer Studies, vol. 43, p. 907-928, substantial revision of paper presented at the International Workshop on Formal Ontology, Available as Technical Report KSL 93-04, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, revised Aug. 23, 1993, 23 pages. |
Gruber, Tom, “(Avoiding) the Travesty of the Commons”, Presentation at NPUC, New Paradigms for User Computing, IBM Almaden Research Center, Jul. 24, 2006, 52 pages. |
Gruber, Tom, “2021: Mass Collaboration and the Really New Economy”, TNTY Futures, vol. 1, No. 6, Available Online at <http://tomgruber.org/writing/tnty2001.htm>, Aug. 2001, 5 pages. |
Gruber, Tom, “Big Think Small Screen: How Semantic Computing in the Cloud will Revolutionize the Consumer Experience on the Phone”, Keynote presentation at Web 3.0 conference, 2009, 41 pages. |
Gruber, Tom, “Collaborating around Shared Content on the WWW”, W3C Workshop on WWW and Collaboration, Available at <http://www.w3.org/Collaboration/Workshop/Proceedings/P9.html>, Sep. 11, 1995, 1 page. |
Gruber, Tom, “Collective Knowledge Systems: Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web”, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2007, pp. 1-19. |
Gruber, Tom, “Despite our Best Efforts, Ontologies are not the Problem”, AAAI Spring Symposium, Available at <http://tomgruber.org/writing/aaai-ss08.htm>, 2008, pp. 1-40. |
Gruber, Tom, “Enterprise Collaboration Management with Intraspect”, Intraspect Technical White Paper, Jul. 2001, pp. 1-24. |
Gruber, Tom, “Every Ontology is a Treaty—A Social Agreement—Among People with Some Common Motive in Sharing”, Official Quarterly Bulletin of AIS Special Interest Group on Semantic Web and Information Systems, vol. 1, No. 3, 2004, pp. 1-5. |
Gruber, Tom, “Helping Organizations Collaborate, Communicate, and Learn”, Presentation to NASA Ames Research, intraspect, available at <http://tomgruber.org/writing/organizational-intelligence-talk.htm>, Mar.-Oct. 2003, 30 pages. |
Gruber, Tom, “Intelligence at the Interface: Semantic Technology and the Consumer Internet Experience”, Presentation at Semantic Technologies Conference, Available at <http://tomgruber.org/writing/semtech08.htm>, 2008, pp. 1-40. |
Gruber, Tom, “It Is What It Does: The Pragmatics of Ontology for Knowledge Sharing”, Proceedings of the International CIDOC CRM Symposium, Available at <http://tomgruber.org/writing/cidoc-ontology.htm>, Mar. 26, 2003, 21 pages. |
Gruber, Tom, “Ontologies, Web 2.0 and Beyond”, Ontology Summit, available at <http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontolog-social-web-keynote.htm>, Apr. 24, 2007, 17 pages. |
Gruber, Tom, “Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges”, Int'l Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems, vol. 3, No. 2, 2007, 7 pages. |
Gruber, Tom, “Siri, a Virtual Personal Assistant—Bringing Intelligence to the Interface”, Semantic Technologies conference, Jun. 16, 2009, 21 pages. |
Gruber, Tom, “TagOntology”, Presentation to Tag Camp, Oct. 29, 2005, 20 pages. |
Gruber, Tom, “Where the Social Web meets the Semantic Web”, Presentation at the 5th International Semantic Web Conference, Nov. 7, 2006, 38 pages. |
Guida et al., “NLI: A Robust Interface for Natural Language Person-Machine Communication”, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 17, 1982, pp. 417-433. |
Guzzoni et al., “A Unified Platform for Building Intelligent Web Interaction Assistants”, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Computer Society, 2006, 4 pages. |
Guzzoni et al., “Active, A Platform for Building Intelligent Operating Rooms”, Surgetica 2007 Computer-Aided Medical Interventions: tools and Applications, Paris, 2007, Sauramps Medical, http://isro.epfl.ch/page-68384-en.html,, 2007, 8 pages. |
Guzzoni et al., “Active, A Platform for Building Intelligent Software,”, Computational Intelligence, available online at <http://www.informatik.uni-trier.del-ley/pers/hd/g/Guzzoni:Didier >, 2006, 5 pages. |
Guzzoni et al., “Active, A Tool for Building Intelligent User Interfaces”, ASC 2007, Palma de Mallorca, <http://isro.epfl.ch/page-34241.html>, 2007, 6 pages. |
Guzzoni et al., “Many Robots Make Short Work”, AAAI Robot Contest, SRI International, 1996, pp. 1-9. |
Guzzoni et al., “Modeling Human-Agent Interaction with Active Ontologies”, AAAI Spring Symposium, Interaction Challenges for Intelligent Assistants, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, 2007, 8 pages. |
Guzzoni, D., “Active: A unified platform for building intelligent assistant applications”, Oct. 25, 2007, 262 pages. |
Haas et al., “An Approach to Acquiring and Applying Knowledge”, SRI international Technical Note 227, Nov. 1980, 22 pages. |
Hadidi et al., “Students' Acceptance of Web-Based Course Offerings: An Empirical Assessment”, Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 1998, 4 pages. |
Hardwar, Devemder, “Driving App Waze Builds its own Siri for Hands-Free Voice Control”, retrieved from internet on Feb. 9, 2012 <http ://ventu rebeat. com/20 12/0 2/09/ driving-a pp-waze-bu i lds-its-own-siri-for -hands- freevoice-control/>, 4 pages. |
Harris, F. J., “On the Use of Windows for Harmonic Analysis with the Discrete Fourier Transform”, In Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 66, No. 1, Jan. 1978, 34 pages. |
Hawkins et al., “Hierarchical Temporal Memory: Concepts, Theory, and Terminology”, Numenta, Inc., Mar. 27, 2007, pp. 1-20. |
He et al., “Personal Security Agent: KQML-Based PKI”, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, paper, 1997, pp. 1-14. |
Helm et al., “Building Visual Language Parsers”, In Proceedings of CHI'91 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1991, pp. 105-112. |
Hendrix et al., “Developing a Natural Language Interface to Complex Data”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 3, No. 2, Jun. 1978, pp. 105-147. |
Hendrix et al., “Transportable Natural-Language Interfaces to Databases”, SRI International, Technical Note 228, Apr. 30, 1981, 18 pages. |
Hendrix et al., “Human Engineering for Applied Natural Language Processing”, SRI International, Technical Note 139, Feb. 1977, 27 pages. |
Hendrix, Gary G., “Klaus: A System for Managing Information and Computational Resources”, SRI International, Technical Note 230, Oct. 1980, 34 pages. |
Hendrix, Gary G., “Lifer: A Natural Language Interface Facility”, SRI Stanford Research Institute, Technical Note 135, Dec. 1976, 9 pages. |
Hendrix, Gary G., “Natural-Language Interface”, American Journal of Computational Linguistics, vol. 8, No. 2, Apr.-Jun. 1982, pp. 56-61. |
Hendrix, Gary G., “The Lifer Manual: A Guide to Building Practical Natural Language Interfaces”, SRI International, Technical Note 138, Feb. 1977, 76 pages. |
Bahl et al., “Multonic Markov Word Models for Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 1, No. 3, Jul. 1993, 11 pages. |
Bahl et al., “Speech Recognition with Continuous-Parameter Hidden Markov Models”, In Proceeding of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'88), vol. 1, Apr. 11-14, 1988, 8 pages. |
Banbrook, M., “Nonlinear Analysis of Speech from a Synthesis Perspective”, A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The University of Edinburgh, Oct. 15, 1996, 35 pages. |
Bear et al., “A System for Labeling Self-Repairs in Speech”, SRI International, Technical Note 522, Feb. 22, 1993, pp. 1-8. |
Bear et al., “Detection and Correction of Repairs in Human-Computer Dialog”, SRI International, Technical Note 518, May 5, 1992, pp. 1-10. |
Bear et al., “Integrating Multiple Knowledge Sources for Detection and Correction of Repairs in Human-Computer Dialog”, Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 1992, 8 pages. |
Bear et al., “Using Information Extraction to Improve Document Retrieval”, SRI International, Jan. 9, 1998, pp. 1-11. |
Belaid et al., “A Syntactic Approach for Handwritten Mathematical Formula Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. PAMI-6, No. 1, Jan. 1984, 7 pages. |
Bellegarda et al., “A Latent Semantic Analysis Framework for Large-Span Language Modeling”, 5th European Conference on Speech, Communication and Technology, (EUROSPEECH'97), Sep. 22-25, 1997, 4 pages. |
Bellegarda et al., “A Multispan Language Modeling Framework for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing vol. 6, No. 5, Sep. 1998, 12 pages. |
Bellegarda et al., “A Novel Word Clustering Algorithm Based on Latent Semantic Analysis”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'96}, vol. 1, 1996, 4 pages. |
Bellegarda et al., “Experiments Using Data Augmentation for Speaker Adaptation”, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'95), May 9-12, 1995, 4 pages. |
Bellegarda et al., “On-Line Handwriting Recognition Using Statistical Mixtures”, Advances in Handwriting and Drawings: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Europia, 6th International IGS Conference on Handwriting and Drawing, Paris-France, Jul. 1993, 11 pages. |
Bellegarda et al., “Performance of the IBM Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition System on the ARPA Wall Street Journal Task”, Signal Processing VII: Theories and Applications, © 1994 European Association for Signal Processing, 1994, 4 pages. |
Bellegarda et al., “The Metamorphic Algorithm: A Speaker Mapping Approach to Data Augmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul. 1994, 8 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., “Exploiting Both Local and Global Constraints for Multi-Span Statistical Language Modeling”, Proceeding of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (1CASSP'98), vol. 2, May 12-15, 1998, 5 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., “Exploiting Latent Semantic Information in Statistical Language Modeling”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, No. 8, Aug. 2000, 18 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., “Interaction-Driven Speech Input—A Data-Driven Approach to the Capture of Both Local and Global Language Constraints”, available online at <http:// old.sig.chi.ora/bulletin/1998.2/bellegarda.html>, 1992, 7 pages. |
Bellegarda, J. R., “Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition with Multispan Statistical Language Models”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 8, No. 1, Jan. 2000, 9 pages. |
Belvin et al., “Development of the HRL Route Navigation Dialogue System”, In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, Paper, 2001, 5 pages. |
Berry et al., “PTIME: Personalized Assistance for Calendaring”, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 2, No. 4, Article 40, Jul. 2011, pp. 1-22. |
Berry et al., “Task Management under Change and Uncertainty Constraint Solving Experience with the CALO Project”, Proceedings of CP'05 Workshop on Constraint Solving under Change, 2005, 5 pages. |
Black et al., “Automatically Clustering Similar Units for Unit Selection in Speech Synthesis”, In Proceedings of Eurospeech 1997, vol. 2, 1997, 4 pages. |
Blair et al., “An Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness for a Full-Text Document-Retrieval System”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 28, No. 3, Mar. 1985, 11 pages. |
Bobrow et al., “Knowledge Representation for Syntactic/Semantic Processing”, AAA-80 Proceedings, 1980, pp. 316-323. |
Bouchou et al., “Using Transducers in Natural Language Database Query”, Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, Austria, Jun. 17-19, 1999, 17 pages. |
Bratt et al., “The SRI Telephone-based ATIS System”, Proceedings of ARPA Workshop on Spoken Language Technology, 1995, 3 pages. |
Briner, L. L., “Identifying Keywords in Text Data Processing”, In Zelkowitz, Marvin V., ED, Directions and Challenges, 15th Annual Technical Symposium, Gaithersbury, Maryland, Jun. 17, 1976, 7 pages. |
Bulyko et al., “Joint Prosody Prediction and Unit Selection for Concatenative Speech Synthesis”, Electrical Engineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, 2001, 4 pages. |
Burke et al., “Question Answering from Frequently Asked Question Files”, AI Magazine, Spring, vol. 18, No. 2, 1997, pp. 57-66. |
Burns et al., “Development of a Web-Based Intelligent Agent for the Fashion Selection and Purchasing Process via Electronic Commerce”, Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information system (AMCIS), Dec. 31, 1998, pp. 140-142. |
Bussey et al., “Service Architecture, Prototype Description, and Network Implications of a Personalized Information Grazing Service”, INFOCOM'90, Ninth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communication Societies, available online at <http://slrohall.com/oublications/>, Jun. 3-7, 1990, 8 pages. |
Bussler et al., “Web Service Execution Environment (WSMX)”, available online at <http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSMX/>, retrieved from internet on Sep. 17, 2012, 29 pages. |
Butcher, Mike, “EVI Arrives in Town to go Toe-to-Toe with Siri”, TechCrunch, Jan. 23, 2012, 2 pages. |
Buzo et al., “Speech Coding Based Upon Vector Quantization”, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-28, No. 5, Oct. 1980, 13 pages. |
Caminero-Gil et al., “Data-Driven Discourse Modeling for Semantic Interpretation”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, May 7-10, 1996, 6 pages. |
Carter et al., “The Speech-Language Interface in the Spoken Language Translator”, SRI International, Nov. 23, 1994, pp. 1-9. |
Carter, David M., “Lexical Acquisition in the Core Language Engine”, Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1989, pp. 137-144. |
Cawley, “The Application of Neural Networks to Phonetic Modelling”, PhD Thesis, University of Essex, Mar. 1996, 13 pages. |
Chai et al., “Comparative Evaluation of a Natural Language Dialog Based System and a Menu Driven System for Information Access: a Case Study”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval (RIAO), Apr. 2000, 11 pages. |
Chang et al., “A Segment-based Speech Recognition System for Isolated Mandarin Syllables”, Proceedings TEN CON '93, IEEE Region 10 conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Power Engineering, vol. 3, Oct. 19-21, 1993, pp. 317-320. |
Chen, Yi, “Multimedia Siri Finds and Plays Whatever You Ask for”, PSFK Report, Feb. 9, 2012, 9 pages. |
Cheyer et al., “Demonstration Video of Multimodal Maps Using an Agent Architecture”, available online at <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3TptMGT9EQ&feature=youtu.be>, published on 1996, 6 pages. |
Cheyer et al., “Demonstration Video of Multimodal Maps Using an Open-Agent Architecture”, available online at <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUxaKnyZyM&feature=youtu.be>, published on 1996, 6 pages. |
Cheyer et al., “Multimodal Maps: An Agent-based Approach”, International Conference on Cooperative Multimodal Communication, Jun. 9, 1995, pp. 1-15. |
Cheyer et al., “Spoken Language and Multimodal Applications for Electronic Realties”, Virtual Reality, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 1-15. |
Cheyer et al., “The Open Agent Architecture,”, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent systems, vol. 4, Mar. 1, 2001, 6 pages. |
Cheyer et al., “The Open Agent Architecture: Building Communities of Distributed Software Agents”, Artificial Intelligence Center SRI International, Power Point presentation, available online at <http://www.ai.sri.com/˜oaa>, Feb. 21, 1998, 25 pages. |
Cheyer, A., “Demonstration Video of Vanguard Mobile Portal”, available online at <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTMsvg_0oLQ&feature=youtu.be>, published on 2004, 10 pages. |
Cheyer, Adam, “A Perspective on AI & Agent Technologies for SCM”, VerticaiNet presentation, 2001, 22 pages. |
Owei et al., “Natural Language Query Filtration in the Conceptual Query Language”, IEEE, 1997, pp. 539-549. |
Pannu et al., “A Learning Personal Agent for Text Filtering and Notification”, Proceedings of the International Conference of Knowledge Based Systems, 1996, pp. 1-11. |
Papadimitriou et al., “Latent Semantic Indexing: A Probabilistic Analysis”, available online at <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/messaqes/downloadsexceeded.html>, Nov. 14, 1997, 21 pages. |
Parsons, T. W., “Voice and Speech Processing”, Pitch and Formant Estimation © 1987, McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN: 0-07-0485541-0, 1987, 15 pages. |
Parsons T. W., “Voice and Speech Processin”, Linguistics and Technical Fundamentals, Articulatory Phonetics and Phonemics, © 1987 McGraw-Hill, Inc., ISBN: 0-07-0485541-0, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US1993/012637, dated Apr. 10, 1995, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US1993/012666, dated Mar. 1, 1995, 5 pages. |
International Search Report received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US1993/012666, dated Nov. 9, 1994, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US1994/011011, dated Feb. 28, 1996, 4 pages. |
International Search Report received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US1994/011011, dated Feb. 8, 1995, 7 pages. |
Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US1994/011011, dated Aug. 21, 1995, 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US1995/008369, dated Oct. 9, 1996, 4 pages. |
International Search Report received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US1995/008369, dated Nov. 8, 1995, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/020861, dated Nov. 29, 2011, 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/029810, dated Oct. 3, 2013, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/029810, dated Aug. 17, 2012, 11 pages. |
Pereira, Fernando, “Logic for Natural Language Analysis”, SRI International, Technical Note 275, Jan. 1983, 194 pages. |
Perrault et al., “Natural-Language Interfaces”, SRI International, Technical Note 393, Aug. 22, 1986, 48 pages. |
Phoenix Solutions, Inc., A, “Declaration of Christopher Schmandt Regarding the MIT Galaxy System”, West Interactive Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Document 40, Jul. 2, 2010, 162 pages. |
Picone, J., “Continuous Speech Recognition Using Hidden Markov Models”, IEEE ASSP Magazine, vol. 7, No. 3, Jul. 1990, 16 pages. |
Pulman et al., “Clare: A Combined Language and Reasoning Engine”, Proceedings of JFIT Conference, available online at <URL: http://www.cam.sri.com/tr/crc042/paper.ps.Z>, 1993, 8 pages. |
Rabiner et al., “Fundamental of Speech Recognition”, © 1993 AT&T, Published by Prentice-Hall, Inc., ISBN: 0-13-285826-6, 1993, 17 pages. |
Rabiner et al., “Note on the Properties of a Vector Quantizer for LPC Coefficients”, Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 62, No. 8, Oct. 1983, 9 pages. |
Ratcliffe, M., “CiearAccess 2.0 allows SQL searches off-line (Structured Query Language)”, ClearAcess Corp., MacWeek, vol. 6, No. 41, Nov. 16, 1992, 2 pages. |
Ravishankar, “Efficient Algorithms for Speech Recognition”, Doctoral Thesis submitted to School of Computer Science, Computer Science Division, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, May 15, 1996, 146 pages. |
Rayner et al., “Adapting the Core Language Engine to French and Spanish”, Cornell University Library, available online at <http:I/arxiv.org/abs/cmp-Ig/9605015.>, May 10, 1996, 9 pages. |
Rayner et al., “Deriving Database Queries from Logical Forms by Abductive Definition Expansion”, Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, ANLC, 1992, 8 pages. |
Rayner et al., “Spoken Language Translation With Mid-90's Technology: A Case Study”, Eurospeech, ISCA, available online at <http:// db I p. u n i-trier. de/d b/conf/interspeech/eurospeech 1993. html#RaynerBCCDGKKLPPS93>, 1993, 4 pages. |
Rayner, M., “Abductive Equivalential Translation and its application to Natural Language Database Interfacing”, Dissertation paper, SRI International, Sep. 1993, 163 pages. |
Rayner, M., “Linguistic Domain Theories: Natural-Language Database Interfacing from First Principles”, SRI International, Cambridge, 1993, 11 pages. |
Remde et al., “SuperBook: An Automatic Tool for Information Exploration-Hypertext?”, In Proceedings of Hypertext '87, Nov. 13-15, 1987, 14 pages. |
Reynolds, C. F., “On-Line Reviews: A New Application of the HICOM Conferencing System”, IEE Colloquium on Human Factors in Electronic Mail and Conferencing Systems, Feb. 3, 1989, 4 pages. |
Rice et al., “Monthly Program: Nov. 14, 1995”, The San Francisco Bay Area Chapter of ACM SIGCHI, Available at <http://www.baychi.org/calendar/19951114>, Nov. 14, 1995, 2 pages. |
Rice et al., “Using the Web Instead of a Window System”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'96, 1996, pp. 1-14. |
Rigoll, G., “Speaker Adaptation for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition Systems Using Speaker Markov Models”, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'89), May 23-26, 1989, 4 pages. |
Riley, M D., “Tree-Based Modelling of Segmental Durations”, Talking Machines Theories, Models, and Designs, 1992 © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland, ISBN: 08-444-89115.3, 1992, 15 pages. |
Rivlin et al., “Maestro: Conductor of Multimedia Analysis Technologies”, SRI International, 1999, 7 pages. |
Rivoira et al., “Syntax and Semantics in a Word-Sequence Recognition System”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'79), Apr. 1979, 5 pages. |
Roddy et al., “Communication and Collaboration in a Landscape of B2B eMarketplaces”, VerticaiNet Solutions, white paper, Jun. 15, 2000, 23 pages. |
Rosenfeld, R., “A Maximum Entropy Approach to Adaptive Statistical Language Modelling”, Computer Speech and Language, vol. 10, No. 3, Jul. 1996, 25 pages. |
Roszkiewicz, A., “Extending your Apple”, Back Talk—Lip Service, A+ Magazine, The Independent Guide for Apple Computing, vol. 2, No. 2, Feb. 1984, 5 pages. |
Rudnicky et al., “Creating Natural Dialogs in the Carnegie Mellon Communicator System”, Proceedings of Eurospeech, vol. 4, 1999, pp. 1531-1534. |
Russell et al., “Artificial Intelligence, A Modern Approac”, © 1995 Prentice Hall, Inc., 1995, 121 pages. |
Sacerdoti et al., “A Ladder User's Guide (Revised)”, SRI International Artificial Intelligence Center, Mar. 1980, 39 pages. |
Sagalowicz, D., “AD-Ladder User's Guide”, SRI International, Sep. 1980, 42 pages. |
Sakoe et al., “Dynamic Programming Algorithm Optimization for Spoken Word Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-26 No. 1, Feb. 1978, 8 pages. |
Salton et al., “On the Application of Syntactic Methodologies in Automatic Text Analysis”, Information Processing and Management, vol. 26, No. 1, Great Britain, 1990, 22 pages. |
Sameshima et al., “Authorization with security attributes and privilege delegation Access control beyond the ACL”, Computer Communications, vol. 20, 1997, 9 pages. |
San-Segundo et al., “Confidence Measures for Dialogue Management in the CU Communicator System”, Proceedings of Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'00), Jun. 5-9, 2000, 4 pages. |
Sato, H., “A Data Model, Knowledge Base, and Natural Language Processing for Sharing a Large Statistical Database,”, Statistical and Scientific Database Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 339, 1989, 20 pages. |
Savoy, J., “Searching Information in Hypertext Systems Using Multiple Sources of Evidence”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 38, No. 6, Jun. 1996, pp. 1017-1030. |
Scagliola, C., “Language Models and Search Algorithms for Real-Time Speech Recognition”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 22, No. 5, 1985, pp. 523-547. |
Schmandt et al., “Augmenting a Window System with Speech Input”, IEEE Computer Society, Computer, vol. 23, No. 8, Aug. 1990, pp. 50-56. |
Ward et al., “A Class Based Language Model for Speech Recognition”, Conference Proceedings International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1996, ICASSP-96 , pp. 416-418. |
Schütze, H., “Dimensions of Meaning”, Proceedings of Supercomputing'92 Conference, Nov. 16-20, 1992, 10 pages. |
Seneff et al., “A New Restaurant Guide Conversational System: Issues in Rapid Prototyping for Specialized Domains”, Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language, 1996. ICSLP 96, 1996, pp. 665-668. |
Sharoff et al., “Register-domain Separation as a Methodology for Development of Natural Language Interfaces to Databases”, Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'99), 1999, 7 pages. |
Sheth et al., “Evolving Agents for Personalized Information Filtering”, In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, Mar. 1-5, 1993, 9 pages. |
Sheth et al., “Relationships at the Heart of Semantic Web: Modeling, Discovering, and Exploiting Complex Semantic Relationships”, Enhancing the Power of the Internet: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Oct. 13, 2002, pp. 1-38. |
Shikano et al., “Speaker Adaptation Through Vector Quantization”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'86), vol. 11, Apr. 1986, 4 pages. |
Shimazu et al., “CAPIT: Natural Language Interface Design Tool with Keyword Analyzer and Case-Based Parser,”, NEG Research & Development, vol. 33, No. 4, Oct. 1992, 11 pages. |
Shinkle, L., “Team User's Guide”, SRI International, Artificial Intelligence Center, Nov. 1984, 78 pages. |
Shklar et al., “Info Harness: Use of Automatically Generated Metadata for Search and Retrieval of Heterogeneous Information”, 1995 Proceedings of CAiSE'95, Finland, 1995. |
Sigurdsson et al., “Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients: An Evaluation of Robustness of MP3 Encoded Music”, In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval ISMIR, 2006, 4 pages. |
Silverman et al., “Using a Sigmoid Transformation for Improved Modeling of Phoneme Duration”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Mar. 15-19, 1999, 5 pages. |
Simonite, Tom, “One Easy Way to Make Siri Smarter”, Technology Review, Oct. 18, 2011, 2 pages. |
Singh, N., “Unifying Heterogeneous Information Models”, Communications of the ACM, 1998, 13 pages. |
SRI International, “The Open Agent Architecture.TM. 1.0 Distribution”, Open Agent Architecture (OAA), 1999, 2 pages. |
SRI2009, “SRI Speech: Products: Software Development Kits: EduSpeak”, available a <http://web.archive.org/web/20090828084033/http://www.speechatsri.com/products/eduspeak> shtml., 2009, 2 pages. |
Starr et al., “Knowledge-Intensive Query Processing”, Proceedings of the 5th KRDB Workshop, Seattle, May 31, 1998, 6 pages. |
Stent et al., “The CommandTalk Spoken Dialogue System”, SRI International, 1999, pp. 183-190. |
Stern et al., “Multiple Approaches to Robust Speech Recognition”, Proceedings of Speech and Natural Language Workshop, 1992, 6 pages. |
Stickel, “A Nonclausal Connection-Graph Resolution Theorem-Proving Program”, Proceedings of AAAI'82, 1982, pp. 1-13. |
Sugumaran, V., “A Distributed Intelligent Agent-Based Spatial Decision Support System”, Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information systems (AMCIS), Dec. 31, 1998, 4 pages. |
Sycara et al., “Coordination of Multiple Intelligent Software Agents”, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS), vol. 5, No. 2 & 3, Jun. & Sep. 1996, 33 pages. |
Sycara et al., “Distributed Intelligent Agents”, IEEE Expert, vol. 11, No. 6, Dec. 1996, 32 pages. |
Sycara et al., “Dynamic Service Matchmaking Among Agents in Open Information Environments”, SIGMOD Record, 1999, 7 pages. |
Sycara et al., “The RETSINA MAS Infrastructure”, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 7, 2003, 20 pages. |
Tenenbaum et al., “Data Structure Using Pascal”, 1981 Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1981, 34 pages. |
Textndrive, “Text'nDrive App Demo—Listen and Reply to your Messages by Voice while Driving!”, YouTube Video available at <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaGfzoHsAMw>, Apr. 27, 2010, 1 page. |
Tofel et al., “SpeakTolt: A Personal Assistant for Older iPhones, iPads”, Apple News, Tips and Reviews, Feb. 9, 2012, 7 pages. |
Tsai et al., “Attributed Grammar—A Tool for Combining Syntactic and Statistical Approaches to Pattern Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-10, No. 12, Dec. 1980, 13 pages. |
Tucker, Joshua, “Too Lazy to Grab Your TV Remote? Use Siri Instead”, Engadget, Nov. 30, 2011, 8 pages. |
Tur et al., “The CALO Meeting Assistant System”, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 18, No. 6, Aug. 2010, pp. 1601-1611. |
Tur et al., “The CALO Meeting Speech Recognition and Understanding System”, Proc. IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop, 2008, 4 pages. |
Tyson et al., “Domain-Independent Task Specification in the TACITUS Natural Language System”, SRI International, Artificial Intelligence Center, May 1990, 16 pages. |
Udell, J., “Computer Telephony”, BYTE, vol. 19, No. 7, Jul. 1, 1994, 9 pages. |
Van Santen, J. P., “Contextual Effects on Vowel Duration”, Journal Speech Communication, vol. 11, No. 6, Dec. 1992, 34 pages. |
Vepa et al., “New Objective Distance Measures for Spectral Discontinuities in Concatenative Speech Synthesis”, In Proceedings of the IEEE 2002 Workshop on Speech Synthesis, 2002, 4 pages. |
Verschelde, J., “MATLAB Lecture 8. Special Matrices in MATLAB,”, UIC Dept. of Math., Stat. & C.S., MCS 320, Introduction to Symbolic Computation, Nov. 23, 2005, 4 pages. |
Vingron, M., “Near-Optimal Sequence Alignment”, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Abteilung Theoretische Bioinformatik, Heidelberg, Germany, Jun. 1996, 20 pages. |
Vlingo, “Vlingo Launches Voice Enablement Application on Apple App Store”, Press Release, Dec. 3, 2008, 2 pages. |
Vlingo Lncar, “Distracted Driving Solution with Vlingo InCar”, YouTube by Vlingo Voice on (Oct. 6, 2010) 2:38 minute video uploaded to Retrieved from Internet on Jun. 6, 2012<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vqs8XfXxgz4?, 2 pages. |
Voiceassist, Send Text, Listen to and Send E˜Mail “by Voice”, YouTube Video available at <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tEU61nHHA4>, Jul. 30, 2009, 1 page. |
Voiceonthego, “Voice on the Go (BlackBerry)”, YouTube available at <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJqpWgQS98w>, Jul. 27, 2009, 1 page. |
Wahlster et al., “Smartkom: Multimodal Communication with a Life-Like Character,”, EUROSPEECH—Scandinavia, 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, 2001, 5 pages. |
Waldinger et al., “Deductive Question Answering from Multiple Resources”, New Directions in Question Answering, published by AAAI, Menlo Park, 2003, 22 pages. |
Walker et al., “Natural Language Access to Medical Text”, SRI International, Artificial Intelligence Center, Mar. 1981, 23 pages. |
Waltz, D., “An English Language Question Answering System for a Large Relational Database”, © 1978 ACM, vol. 21, No. 7, 1978, 14 pages. |
Lieberman et al., “Out of Context: Computer Systems that Adapt to, and Learn from, Context”, IBM Systems Journal vol. 39, No. 3&4, 2000, pp. 617-632. |
Lin et al., “A Distributed Architecture for Cooperative Spoken Dialogue Agents with Coherent Dialogue State and History”, <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=1 0.1.1.42.272>, 1999, 4 pages. |
Lin et al., “A New Framework for Recognition of Mandarin Syllables With Tones Using Sub-syllabic Units”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-93), Apr. 27-30, 1993, pp. 227-230. |
Linde, “An Algorithm for Vector Quantizer Design”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 1980, pp. 84-95. |
Liu et al., “Efficient Joint Compensation of Speech for the Effects of Additive Noise and Linear Filtering”, IEEE International Conference of Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,ICASSP-92, Mar. 23-26, 1992, pp. 257-260. |
Lntraspect Software, “The Intraspect Knowledge Management Solution: Technical Overview”, <http://tomgruber.org/writing/intraspect-whitepaper-1998.pdf>, 1998, 18 pages. |
Logan et al., “Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients for Music Modeling”, In International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, 2000, 2 pages. |
Lowegian International, “FIR Filter Properties”, dspGuro, Digital Signal Processing Central, available online at <httJ;>://www.dspQuru.com/dso/taas/fir/orooerties, > retrived from Internet on Jul. 28, 2010, 6 pages. |
Lowerre, B. T., “The-HARPY Speech Recognition System”, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Apr. 1976, 20 pages. |
Maghbouleh, A., “An Empirical Comparison of Automatic Decision Tree and Linear Regression Models for Vowel Durations”, Revised Version of a Paper Presented at the Computational Phonology in Speech Technology workshop, 1996 annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics in Santa Cruz, California, 7 pages. |
Markel et al., “Linear Prediction of Speech”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1976, 12 pages. |
Martin et al., “The Open Agent Architecture: A Framework for Building Distributed Software Systems”, Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal, vol. 13, No. 1-2, pp. 1-38. |
Martin et al., “Building and Using Practical Agent Applications”, SRI International, PAAM Tutorial, 1998, pp. 1-26. |
Martin et al., “Building Distributed Software Systems with the Open Agent Architecture”, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology, Mar. 23-25, 1998, pp. 355-376. |
Martin et al., “Development Tools for the Open Agent Architecture”, Proceedings of the International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology, Apr. 1996, pp. 1-17. |
Martin et al., “Information Brokering in an Agent Architecture”, Proceedings of the second International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology, Apr. 1997, pp. 1-20. |
Martin et al., “Transportability and Generality in a Natural-Language Interface System”, Proceedings of the Eight International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Technical Note 293, Aug. 8-12, 1983, 21 pages. |
Matiasek et al., “Tamic-P: A System for NL Access to Social Insurance Database”, 4th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, Jun. 17-19, 1999, 7 pages. |
McGuire et al., “SHADE: Technology for Knowedge-Based Collaborative Engineering”, Journal of Concurrent Engineering˜r Applications and Research (CERA), 1993, 18 pages. |
Meng et al., “Wheels: A Conversational System in the Automobile Classified Domain”, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language, 1996, ICSLP 96, Oct. 1996, pp. 542-545. |
Michos et al., “Towards an Adaptive Natural Language Interface to Command Languages”, Natural Language Engineering, vol. 2, No. 3, 1996, pp. 191-209. |
Milstead et al., “Metadata: Cataloging by Any Other Name”, Online, Information Today. Inc., Jan. 1999, 18 pages. |
Milward et al., “D2.2: Dynamic MultimodalInterface Reconfiguration” Talk and Look: Tools for Ambient Linguistic Knowledge, IST-507802 Deliverable D2.2, Aug. 8, 2006, 69 pages. |
Minker et al., “Hidden Understanding Models for Machine Translation”, Proceedings of ETRW on Interactive Dialogue in Multi-Modal Systems, Jun. 1999, pp. 1-4. |
Mitra et al., “A Graph-Oriented Model for Articulation of Ontology Interdependencies”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1777, 2000, pp. 86-100. |
Modi et al., “CMRadar: A Personal Assistant Agent for Calendar Management”, AAAI, Intelligent Systems Demonstrations, 2004, pp. 1020-1021. |
Moore et al., “Combining Linguistic and Statistical Knowledge Sources in Natural-Language Processing for ATIS”, SRI International, ArtificialIntelliqence Center, 1995, 4 pages. |
Moore et al., “SRI's Experience with the ATIS Evaluation”, Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Natural Language, Jun. 24-27, 1990, pp. 147-148. |
Moore et al., “The Information Warefare Advisor: An Architecture for Interacting with Intelligent Agents Across the Web”, Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Dec. 31, 1998, pp. 186-188. |
Moore, Robert C., “Handling Complex Queries in a Distributed Data Base”, SRI International, Technical Note 170, Oct. 8, 1979, 38 pages. |
Moore, Robert C., “Practical Natural-Language Processing by Computer”, SRI International, Technical Note 251, Oct. 1981, 34 pages. |
Moore, Robert C., “The Role of Logic in Knowledge Representation and Commonsense Reasoning”, SRI International, Technical Note 264, Jun. 1982, 19 pages. |
Moore, Robert C., “Using Natural-Language Knowledge Sources in Speech Recognition”, SRI International, Artificial Intelligence Center, Jan. 1999, pp. 1-24. |
Moran et al., “Intelligent Agent-based User Interfaces”, Proceedings of International Workshop on Human Interface Technology, Oct. 12-13, 1995, pp. 1-4. |
Moran et al., “Multimodal User Interfaces in the Open Agent Architecture”, International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI97), 1997, 8 pages. |
Moran, Douglas B., “Quantifier Soaping in the SRI Core Language Engine”, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, 1988, pp. 33-40. |
Morgan, B., “Business Objects (Business Objects for Windows) Business Objects Inc.”, DBMS, vol. 5, No. 10, Sep. 1992, 3 pages. |
Motro, Amihal “Flex: A Tolerant and Cooperative User Interface to Databases”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 2, No. 2, Jun. 1990, pp. 231-246. |
Mountford et al., “Talking and Listening to Computers”, The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design, Copyright © 1990 Apple Computer, Inc. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc, 1990, 17 pages. |
Mozer, Michael C., “An Intelligent Environment Must be Adaptive”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Mar./Apr. 1999, pp. 11-13. |
Muhlhauser, Max, “Context Aware Voice User Interfaces for Workflow Support”, 2007, 254 pages. |
Murty, “Combining Evidence from Residual Phase and MFCC Features for Speaker Recognition”, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 52-55. |
Murveit et al., “Integrating Natural Language Constraints into HMM-based Speech Recognition”, 1990 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 3-6, 1990, 5 pages. |
Murveit et al., “Speech Recognition in SRI's Resource Management and ATIS Systems”, Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, 1991, pp. 94-100. |
Nakagawa et al., “Speaker Recognition by Combining MFCC and Phase Information”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP, Mar. 14-19, 2010, pp. 4502-4505. |
Naone, Erica, “TR10: Intelligent Software Assistant”, Technology Review, Mar.-Apr. 2009, 2 pages. |
Neches et al., “Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing”, Fall, 1991, pp. 37-56. |
Niesler et al., “A Variable-Length Category-Based N-Gram Language Model”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'96), vol. 1, May 7-10, 1996, pp. 164-167. |
Noth et al., “Verbmobil: The Use of Prosody in the Linguistic Components of a Speech Understanding System”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 8, No. 5, Sep. 2000, pp. 519-532. |
Odubiyi et al., “SAIRE—A Scalable Agent-Based Information Retrieval Engine”, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 1997, 12 pages. |
“Integrated Audio-Graphics User Interface”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 33, No. 11, Apr. 1991, pp. 368-371. |
“Interactive Voice”, available online at <http://www.helloivee.com/company/> retrieved from internet on Feb. 10, 2014, 2 pages. |
“Meet Ivee Your Wi-Fi Voice Activated Assistant”, available online at <http://www.helloivee.com/> retrieved from internet on Feb. 10, 2014, 8 pages. |
“Mel Scale”, Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia, last modified on Oct. 13, 2009 and retrieved on Jul. 28, 2010, available online <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_scale>, 2 pages. |
“Minimum Phase”, Wikipedia the free Encyclopedia, Last Modified on Jan. 12, 2010 and retrieved on Jul. 28, 2010, available online at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_phase>, 8 pages. |
“Speech Editor”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 29, No. 10, Mar. 1987, pp. 4512-4514. |
“Speech Recognition with Hidden Markov Models of Speech Waveforms”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 34, No. 1, Jun. 1991, pp. 7-16. |
Ex-Parte Quayle Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/244,713, dated Sep. 10, 2012, 5 pages. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/244,713, dated Dec. 23, 2011, 11 pages. |
Bahl et al., “Large Vocabulary Natural Language Continuous Speech Recognition”, In Proceedings of 1989 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 1, May 23-26, 1989, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/244,713, dated Aug. 7, 2012, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/244,713, dated May 10, 2012, 5 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,144, dated Nov. 19, 2013, 24 pages. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/053,144, dated Mar. 22, 2013, 18 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,422, dated Jul. 19, 2012, 9 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/480,422, dated Sep. 27, 2012, 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/604,556, dated Apr. 1, 2013, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/604,556, dated Jul. 31, 2013, 9 pages. |
Acero et al., “Environmental Robustness in Automatic Speech Recognition”, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'90), Apr. 3-6, 1990, 4 pages. |
Acero et al., “Robust Speech Recognition by Normalization of the Acoustic Space”, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1991, 4 pages. |
Agnes et al., “Spoken Language Translator: First-Year Report”, SICS Research Report, Jan. 1994, 161 pages. |
Ahlborn et al., “Modeling Spectral Speech Transitions Using Temporal Decomposition Techniques”, IEEE International Conference of Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'87), vol. 12, Apr. 1987, 4 pages. |
Aikawa et al., “Speech Recognition Using Time-Warping Neural Networks”, Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing, Sep. 30 to Oct. 1, 1991, 10 pages. |
Alfred App, available online at <http://www.alfredapp.com/>, retrieved on Feb. 8, 2012, 5 pages. |
Allen, James, “Natural Language Understanding”, 2nd Edition, 1995, 671 pages. |
Alshawi et al., “CLARE: A Contextual Reasoning and Cooperative Response Framework for the Core Language Engine—Final Report”, SRI International, available online at <http://www.cam.sri.com/tr/crc028/paper.ps.Z>, Dec. 1992, pp. 1-272. |
Alshawi et al., “Declarative Derivation of Database Queries from Meaning Representations”, Proceedings of the Bankai Workshop, Oct. 1991, pp. 1-12. |
Alshawi et al., “Logical Forms in the Core Language Engine”, Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1989, pp. 25-32. |
Alshawi et al., “Overview of the Core Language Engine”, Proceedings of Future Generation Computing Systems, Sep. 1988, pp. 1-13. |
Alshawi, Hiyan, “Translation and Monotonic Interpretation/Generation”, SRI International, available online at <http://www.cam.sri.com/tr/crc024/paper.ps.Z>, Jul. 1992, pp. 1-18. |
Ambite et al., “Design and Implementation of the CALO Query Manager”, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 2006, 8 pages. |
Ambite et al., “Integration of Heterogeneous Knowledge Sources in the CALO Query Manager”, The 4th International Conference on Ontologies, DataBases, and Applications of Semantics (ODBASE), 2005, 18 pages. |
Anastasakos et al., “Duration Modeling in Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition”, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'95), May 9-12, 1995, 4 pages. |
Anderson et al., “Syntax-Directed Recognition of Hand-Printed Two-Dimensional Mathematics”, In Proceedings of Symposium on Interactive Systems for Experimental Applied Mathematics: Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery Inc. Symposium, 1967, 12 pages. |
Anonymous, “Speaker Recognition”, Wikipedia, The Free Enclyclopedia, Nov. 2, 2010, 3 pages. |
Ansari et al., “Pitch Modification of Speech using a Low-Sensitivity Inverse Filter Approach”, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 5, No. 3, Mar. 1998, 3 pages. |
Anthony et al., “Supervised Adaption for Signature Verification System”, IBM Technical Disclosure, Jun. 1, 1978, 3 pages. |
Appelt et al., “Fastus: A Finite-state Processor for Information Extraction from Real-world Text”, Proceedings of IJCAI, 1993, 8 pages. |
Appelt et al., “SRI International Fastus System MUC-6 Test Results and Analysis”, SRI International, 1995, 12 pages. |
Appelt et al., “SRI: Description of the JV-FASTUS System Used for MUC-5”, SRI International, 1993, pp. 1-19. |
Apple Computer, “Guide Maker User's Guide”, © Apple Computer, Inc., Apr. 27, 1994, 8 pages. |
Apple Computer, “Introduction to Apple Guide”, © Apple Computer, Inc., Apr. 28, 1994, 20 pages. |
Apple Computer, “Knowledge Navigator”, available online at <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRH8eimU_20>, Uploaded on Apr. 29, 2008, 7 pages. |
Archbold et al., “A Team User's Guide”, SRI International, Technical Note 254, Dec. 21, 1981, 70 pages. |
Asanovic et al., “Experimental Determination of Precision Requirements for Back-Propagation Training of Artificial Neural Networks”, In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Microelectronics for Neural Networks, 1991, www.ICSI.Berkelev.EDU, 1991, 7 pages. |
Atal et al., “Efficient Coding of LPC Parameters by Temporal Decomposition”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'83), Apr. 1983, 4 pages. |
Bahl et al., “A Maximum Likelihood Approach to Continuous Speech Recognition”, IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. PAMI-5, No. 2, Mar. 1983, 13 pages. |
Bahl et al., “A Tree-Based Statistical Language Model for Natural Language Speech Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol. 37, No., Jul. 1989, 8 pages. |
Bahl et al., “Acoustic Markov Models Used in the Tangora Speech Recognition System”, In Proceeding of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'88), vol. 1, Apr. 11-14, 1988, 4 pages. |
Bulyko et al., “Error-Correction Detection and Response Generation in a Spoken Dialogue System”, Speech Communication, vol. 45, 2005, pp. 271-288. |
Cheyer, Adam, “About Adam Cheyer”, available online at <http://www.adam.cheyer.com/about.html>, retrieved from Internet on Sep. 17, 2012, 2 pages. |
Codd, E. F., “Databases: Improving Usability and Responsiveness—How About Recently”, 1978, pp. 3-28. |
Cohen et al., “An Open Agent Architecture”, SRI International, 1994, pp. 1-8. |
Coles et al., “Chemistry Question-Answering”, Technical Note 9, Jun. 1969, 15 pages |
Coles et al., “Techniques for Information Retrieval Using an Inferential Question-Answering System with Natural Language Input”, Technical Note74, Nov. 1972, 198 Pages. |
Coles Stephen L., “The Application of Theorem Proving to Information Retrieval”, Technical Note 51, Jan. 1971, 21 pages. |
Conklin, “Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey”, Computer Magazine, Sep. 1987, 25 pages. |
Connolly et al., “Fast Algorithms for Complex Matrix Multiplication Using Surrogates”, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 37, No. 6, Jun. 1989, 13 pages. |
Constantinides et al., “A Schema Based Approach to Dialog Control”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 1998, 4 pages. |
Cox et al., “Speech and Language Processing for Next-Millennium Communications Services”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, No. 8, Aug. 2000, pp. 1314-1337. |
Craig et al., “Deacon: Direct English Access and Control”, AFIPS Conference Proceedings, vol. 29, Nov. 7-10, 1966, pp. 365-380. |
Cutkosky et al., “PACT: An Experiment in Integrating Concurrent Engineering Systems”, Jan. 1993, pp. 1-13. |
Dar et al., “DTL's DataSpot: Database Exploration Using Plain Language”, Proceedings of the 24th VLDB Conference, 1998, pp. 645-649. |
Davis et al., “A Personal Handheld Multi-Modal Shopping Assistant”, IEEE, 2006, 9 pages. |
Decker et al., “Designing Behaviors for Information Agents”, Jul. 6, 1996, pp. 1-15. |
Decker et al., “Matchmaking and Brokering”, May 16, 1996, pp. 1-19. |
Deerwester et al., “Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 41, No. 6, Sep. 1990, 19 pages. |
Deller, Jr., et al., “Discrete-Time Processing of Speech Signals”, May 13, 1993, pp. 114-137. |
Digital Equipment Corporation, “Open VMS Software Overview”, Dec. 1995, 159 pages. |
Domingue et al., “Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO)—An Ontology for Semantic Web Services”, Position paper at the W3C Workshop on Frameworks for Semantics in Web Services, Jun. 9-10, 2005, 6 pages. |
Donovan, Robert E., “A New Distance Measure for Costing Spectral Discontinuities in Concatenative Speech Synthesisers”, 2001, 4 pages. |
Dowding et al., “Gemini: A Natural Language System for Spoken-Language Understanding”, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1993, 8 pages. |
Dowding et al., “Interleaving Syntax and Semantics in an Efficient Bottom-Up Parser”, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1994, 7 pages. |
Elio et al., “On Abstract Task Models and Conversation Policies”, 1999, pp. 1-10. |
Epstein et al., “Natural Language Access to a Melanoma Data Base”, Technical Note 171, Sep. 1978, 7 pages. |
Ericsson et al., “Software Illustrating a Unified Approach to Multimodality and Multilinguality in the in-home Domain”, Talk and Look: Tools for Ambient Linguistic Knowledge, Dec. 22, 2006, 127 pages. |
Evi, “Meet Evi: The One Mobile App that Provides Solutions for Your Everyday Problems”, avialable online at <http://www.evi.com/>, retrieved on Feb. 8, 2012, 3 pages. |
Grosz et al., “Dialogic: A Core Natural-Language Processing System”, SRI International, Nov. 9, 1982, 17 pages. |
Exhibit, 1, “Natural Language Interface Using Constrained Intermediate Dictionary of Results”, List of Publications Manually reviewed for the Search of U.S. Pat. No. 7,177,798, Mar. 22, 2013, 1 page. |
Feigenbaum et al., “Computer-assisted Semantic Annotation of Scientific Life Works”, Oct. 15, 2007, 22 pages. |
Ferguson et al., “TRIPS: An Integrated Intelligent Problem-Solving Assistant”, Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98) and Tenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-98), 1998, 7 pages. |
Fikes et al., “A Network-based knowledge Representation and its Natural Deduction System”, SRI International, Jul. 1977, 43 pages. |
Frisse, M. E., “Searching for Information in a Hypertext Medical Handbook”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 31, No. 7, Jul. 1988, 8 pages. |
Gamback et al., “The Swedish Core Language Engine”, NOTEX Conference, 1992, 17 pages. |
Gannes, Liz, “Alfred App Gives Personalized Restaurant Recommendations”, AllThingsD, Jul. 18, 2011, pp. 1-3. |
Gautier et al., “Generating Explanations of Device Behavior Using Compositional Modeling and Causal Ordering”, CiteSeerx, 1993, pp. 89-97. |
Gervasio et al., “Active Preference Learning for Personalized Calendar Scheduling Assistancae”, CiteSeerx, In Proc. of IUI'05, Jan. 9-12, 2005, pp. 90-97. |
Glass et al., “Multilingual Language Generation Across Multiple Domains”, International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Japan, Sep. 18-22, 1994, 5 pages. |
Glass et al., “Multilingual Spoken-Language Understanding in the Mit Voyager System”, <http://groups.csail.mit.edu/sls/publications/1995/speechcomm95-voyager.pdf>, Aug. 1995, 29 pages. |
Glass, Alyssa, “Explaining Preference Learning”, CiteSeerx, 2006, pp. 1-5. |
Goddeau et al., “A Form-Based Dialogue Manager for Spoken Language Applications”, http://phasedance.com/pdf!icslp96.pdf, Oct. 1996, 4 pages. |
Goddeau et al., “Galaxy: A Human-Language Interface to On-Line Travel Information”, International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 1994, Yokohama, 1994, pp. 707-710. |
Goldberg et al., “Using Collaborative Filtering to Weave an Information Tapestry”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 35, No. 12, Dec. 1992, 10 pages. |
Gorin et al., “On Adaptive Acquisition of Language”, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'90), vol. 1, Apr. 3-6, 1990, 5 pages. |
Gotoh et al., “Document Space Models Using Latent Semantic Analysis”, In Proceedings of Eurospeech, 1997, 4 pages. |
Gray, R. M., “Vector Quantization”, IEEE ASSP Magazine, Apr. 1984, 26 pages. |
Green, C., “The Application of Theorem Proving to Question-Answering Systems”, SRI Stanford Research Institute, Artificial Intelligence Group, Jun. 1969, 169 pages. |
Gregg et al., “DSS Access on the WWW: An Intelligent Agent Prototype”, Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems-Association for Information Systems, 1998, 3 pages. |
Grishman et al., “Computational Linguistics: An Introduction”, © Cambridge University Press, 1986, 172 pages. |
Ward et al., “Recent Improvements in the CMU Spoken Language Understanding System”, ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop, 1994, pp. 213-216. |
Ward, Wayne, “The CMU Air Travel Information Service: Understanding Spontaneous Speech”, Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, HLT '90, 1990, pp. 127-129. |
Warren, “An Efficient Easily Adaptable System for Interpreting Natural Language Queries”, American Journal of Computational Linguistics, vol. 8, No. 3-4, Jul.-Dec. 1982, pp. 110-119. |
Weizenbaum, Joseph, “ELIZA—A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 9, No. 1, Jan. 1966, pp. 36-45. |
Werner et al., “Prosodic Aspects of Speech,” Universite de Lausanne, Switzerland, 1994, Fundamentals of Speech Synthesis and Speech Recognition: Basic Concepts, State of the Art, and Future Challenges, 1994, pp. 23-40. |
Winiwarter et al., “Adaptive Natural Language Interfaces to FAQ Knowledge Bases”, Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, Austria, Jun. 17-19, 1999, 22 pages. |
Wolff, Mark, “Poststructuralism and the ARTFUL Database: Some Theoretical Considerations”, Information Technology and Libraries, vol. 13, No. 1, Mar. 1994, 10 pages. |
Wu et al., “KDA: A Knowledge-based Database Assistant”, Data Engineering, Proceeding of the Fifth International Conference on Engineering (IEEE Cat No. 89CH2695-5), Feb. 6-10, 1989, pp. 402-409. |
Wu, Min, “Digital Speech Processing and Coding”, ENEE408G Capstone-Multimedia Signal Processing, Spring 2003, Lecture-2 Course Presentation, University of Maryland, College Park, 2003, pp. 1-8. |
Wu, Min, “Speech Recognition, Synthesis, and H.C.I.”, ENEE408G Capstone-Multimedia Signal Processing, Spring 2003, Lecture-3 course presentation, University of Maryland, College Park, 2003, pp. 1-11. |
Wyle, M. F., “A Wide Area Network Information Filter”, In Proceedings of First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence on Wall Street, Oct. 9-11, 1991, pp. 10-15. |
Yang et al., “Smart Sight: A Tourist Assistant System”, Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 1999, 6 pages. |
Yankelovich et al., “Intermedia: The Concept and the Construction of a Seamless Information Environment”, IEEE Computer Magazine, Jan. 1988, pp. 81-96. |
Yoon et al., “Letter-to-Sound Rules for Korean”, Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University, 2002, 4 pages. |
Zeng et al., “Cooperative Intelligent Software Agents”, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University, Mar. 1995, 13 pages. |
Zhao Leon., “Intelligent Agents for Flexible Workflow Systems”, Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 1998, pp. 237-239. |
Zhao, Y., “An Acoustic-Phonetic-Based Speaker Adaptation Technique for Improving Speaker-Independent Continuous Speech Recognition”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul. 1994, pp. 380-394. |
Zovato et al., “Towards Emotional Speech Synthesis: A Rule based Approach”, Proceedings 5TH ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop—Pittsburgh, 2004, pp. 219-220. |
Zue et al., “From Interface to Content: Translingual Access and Delivery of On-Line Information”, EUROSPEECH, 1997, 4 pages. |
Zue et al., “Jupiter: A Telephone-Based Conversational Interface for Weather Information”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Jan. 2000, pp. 100-112. |
Zue et al., “Pegasus: A Spoken Dialogue Interface for On-Line Air Travel Planning”, Elsevier, Speech Communication, vol. 15, 1994, 10 pages. |
Zue et al., “The Voyager Speech Understanding System: Preliminary Development and Evaluation”, Proceedings of IEEE 1990 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1990, pp. 73-76. |
Zue, Victor, “Conversational Interfaces: Advances and Challenges”, Spoken Language System Group <http://www.cs.cmu.edu/-dod/papers/zue97.pdf>, Sep. 1997, 10 pages. |
Zue, Victor W., “Toward Systems that Understand Spoken Language”, ARPA Strategic Computing Institute, Feb. 1994, pp. 51-59. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150161521 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |