The field of this invention is springs and more particularly springs for downhole use where high force and a long deflection range is needed where the spring is a tubular structure created by compressive loading before or after assembly into a downhole tool.
Tubular shapes with wavy edges made from rubber or other plastics generally by molding the shape and compressing it when in service to serve as a spring are well known as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,141,697 (ribs control buckle locations); U.S. Pat. No. 4,235,427 (bellows wall on plastic tube); U.S. Pat. No. 5,326,083 (elastomer tubular shape for automotive use; U.S. Pat. No. 3,037,764 (elastomer tube with external scores used as a spring); U.S. Pat. No. 5,868,384 (steel tube surrounded by rubber cylinder with both compressed to make a spring with an internal stiffener); U.S. Pat. No. 3,409,284 (molded rubber cylindrical shape used a spring); U.S. Pat. No. 3,315,951 (bellows shaped rubber tube with ribs); U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,844 (elastomer cylindrical shape with metal end plates used as a spring and U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,617 (bellows shaped rubber tube with metal rings at the bellows peaks to hold an outside dimension in a surrounding tube). WO 8901577 shows what appears to be a fabricated metal bellows for a low force application with opposed or offset undulations used as a spring for sensitive instruments that require low hysteresis such as with measuring instruments. It does not appear that the unique shape is made by simple compression and the shape may be fabricated and rolled into a tube. The key seems to be the positioning of the bends with respect to the neutral axis.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,896,049 illustrates a metal cylinder compressed to the point of collapse to use as a seal at the outward buckle locations. U.S. Pat. No. 6,182,755 assigned to Sandia is for a pre-made metallic bellows that is run in under tension and is made to fold downhole under a compressive force until the folds engage a surrounding surface for sealing.
Most of the references described above are compressed cylinders used as springs and made from resilient rubber structures that are molded to have an undulating wall or scored or ribbed to control where and the extent of buckling that occurs under compressive force as a way to control the force delivered by the spring. Clearly many of these are bulky structures not at all suitable for being a component of a downhole tool that needs significant spring force to create some motion in the operational sequence of a downhole tool.
Some of these references use a fabricated bellows or a scored cylinder not for spring use but for sealing.
The present invention has a variety of aspects. The structure in one embodiment can be created downhole when a cylinder assembled to a tool is compressed downhole. The present invention has a rotational locking feature in a spring. It allows taking flow through a spring as a pressure conductor where there is a pressure differential between the inside and the outside of the tube-shaped spring, represented schematically by arrows 29 and 31 to indicate a differential pressure in either direction. Alternatively there can be openings 27 in the wall to act as dampeners as flow represented by arrow 33 passes through them during movement of the spring. Compressing a cylinder between a mandrel on the inside and a cover tube on the outside is another feature of the invention. The use of a cylindrical spring in a metal to metal seal in a packer is an application of the present invention.
Some packers used downhole employ metal to metal sealing technology against large differential pressures and in hostile temperature environments. In such applications a large spring force is required over a long displacement to retain the metal to metal seal and to compensate for anticipated temperature differentials that can also affect the set of the metal to metal seal. A large spring force may be also required to compensate for the axial backlash (slop) inherent in locking devices such as body lock rings or ratchets that occurs when removing the setting force.
Accordingly, the present invention seeks to provide such a structure that will function in this service as well as other high demand spring applications in space limited environments such as those that the art described above are not designed to be used. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that tubular springs of the present invention can retain pressure differentials, transmit torque and can be fixedly retained at the ends to facilitate mill out of the tool in which they are mounted. Such tubular springs can be mounted to an assembled tool as cylinders and compressed into operating shape downhole or they can be deformed prior to assembly and compressed into position in a downhole tool assembly. These and other aspects of the present invention will be more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings, recognizing that the full scope of the invention is given by the claims.
A spring for use in downhole tools delivers a high force over a long deflection in a relatively uniform fashion. The spring is a tubular shape that is preferably metallic and is preferably plastically deformed into an undulating walled tube either before assembly into a downhole tool or downhole after assembly to the downhole tool. Flexible rings, split rings, or āCā rings are used inside and outside the tube as it is compressed to obtain the desired corrugated wall pattern and to prevent localized buckling that can cause wall failure. The spring can conduct pressurized fluids and be rotationally locked to transmit torque and to facilitate milling out. Some machining internally and/or externally can assist in forming the desired corrugated wall shape.
Although packers that seal metal to metal have been discussed as an application, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other downhole tools can benefit from the spring of the present invention and the manner in which it can be produced. Other examples of possible applications can be subsurface safety valves, disconnect couplings and adjustable swages to name a few applications. The materials for the spring 26 while being preferably metallic have to also be compatible with long term exposure to well conditions and the anticipated amount of cycling while in service as well as being able to provide the force needed in the tool in which the spring is deployed. The deformation of the original shape is preferably plastic which still allows flexure in the resulting shape to be able to deliver the required force over the needed deflection range. Alternatively, the desired shape can be obtained by machining a tubular shape with the desired wall characteristics.
It should be noted that prior designs of metal to metal sealing packers tried coiled springs or a stack of Belleville washers. The stack of Belleville washers had significant dampening and friction effects from relative movement among the washers. This tubular spring 26 delivers more force over a comparable or longer deflection range than the previously used coiled springs while being smaller to fit into confined locations for downhole use. Another advantage is the ability of the spring 26 to conduct pressurized fluids for a variety of operational purposes in a downhole tool. By the same token, pressure differentials between the interior and exterior of the spring can be tolerated and the interior can also accommodate internal fluid dampening because of this structure. Alternatively the body of the spring can have openings provided for reasons such as drainage. Alternatively, wall openings can be provided and sized to provide a dampening action when the spring is run in fluid on one or both sides.
The material for the spring can be uniform or dissimilar materials can be used to get desired properties for a given application. Tensile loads can also be applied to the spring 26 such as when applying a pulling force to release seal 20. The spring can be heat treated after plastic deformation to relieve residual stresses. The number of peaks and valleys in the wall can be adjusted to the deflection required in the application for the desired applied operating force.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1554739 | Lewis | Sep 1925 | A |
1561065 | Eggleston | Nov 1925 | A |
1698210 | Bezzenberger | Jan 1929 | A |
1711075 | Zimmerman | Apr 1929 | A |
1844469 | Giesler et al. | Feb 1932 | A |
1984002 | Ward | Dec 1934 | A |
2129120 | Davis | Sep 1938 | A |
2183304 | Davis | Dec 1939 | A |
2903242 | Bodine, Jr. | Sep 1959 | A |
2965961 | Schindler et al. | Dec 1960 | A |
3015354 | Wood | Jan 1962 | A |
3037764 | Paulsen | Jun 1962 | A |
3091280 | Yowell et al. | May 1963 | A |
3103244 | Schindler et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
3298441 | Young | Jan 1967 | A |
3315951 | Boschi et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3394631 | Thompson | Jul 1968 | A |
3409085 | Oliver | Nov 1968 | A |
3409284 | Rix | Nov 1968 | A |
3493921 | Johns | Feb 1970 | A |
3516493 | McGill | Jun 1970 | A |
3530566 | Abercrombie et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3577621 | De Gain | May 1971 | A |
3584858 | Beck | Jun 1971 | A |
3677535 | Beck | Jul 1972 | A |
3704983 | Tellot | Dec 1972 | A |
3774896 | Rode | Nov 1973 | A |
3884457 | Leko | May 1975 | A |
3908769 | Schuyf et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4065947 | Mazier | Jan 1978 | A |
4235427 | Bialobrzeski | Nov 1980 | A |
4254837 | Jones | Mar 1981 | A |
T100801 | Bianca | Jul 1981 | I4 |
4364252 | Koizumi | Dec 1982 | A |
4566678 | Anderson | Jan 1986 | A |
4593765 | Greenlee | Jun 1986 | A |
4697640 | Szarka | Oct 1987 | A |
4750564 | Pettigrew et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4996857 | Kageyama et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5036945 | Hoyle et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5127354 | Magrab et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5141697 | Wydra | Aug 1992 | A |
5146993 | Gambertoglio | Sep 1992 | A |
5222718 | Buck | Jun 1993 | A |
5284208 | Clemens et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5326083 | Wydra et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5351844 | Carlstedt | Oct 1994 | A |
5868384 | Anderson | Feb 1999 | A |
5927401 | Morris et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6119774 | Doane et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6182755 | Mansure | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6250617 | Tews | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253856 | Ingram et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282939 | Minamidate et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302217 | Kilgore et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328062 | Williams et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6357377 | Santelli, Jr. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6386012 | Minamidate et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6516878 | McGarian et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6536532 | Doane | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6564606 | Okada et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6684547 | Poff, Jr. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6715560 | Doane et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6820317 | Okada | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6896049 | Moyes | May 2005 | B2 |
7080436 | Durand | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7090020 | Hill et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7216737 | Sugiyama | May 2007 | B2 |
7604048 | Kossa et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7757764 | Vert et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7798213 | Harvey et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20010039822 | Minamidate et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052253 | Okada et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030126732 | Okada | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20070194508 | Bucciero | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8901577 | Feb 1989 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100088895 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |