Inductors are known to be critical energy storage components of power conversion circuits located on integrated circuit chips. By way of one example, a thin-film ferromagnetic inductor may be used for on-chip DC-DC voltage conversion on a computer processor.
Such inductors have typically been formed by creating a magnetic material stack that is comprised of multiple layers of magnetic material. The magnetic material stack serves as the yoke material for the inductor, around which one or more coil windings or wires (e.g., single-turn and multi-turn coil designs) are wrapped. In the thin-film ferromagnetic inductor, the stack may be several microns or more in thickness. The overall thickness of the stack is selected to obtain a desired inductance value, while maintaining a desired operating frequency.
While increasing the thickness of the magnetic material stack increases the inductance value, it also increases eddy currents. An eddy current is an electrical current that is induced within a conductor by a changing magnetic field in the conductor. The induced electrical current creates a magnetic field that opposes the magnetic field that created the induced current, which adversely affects the performance of the inductor. Thus, controlling the thickness of the magnetic material stack is beneficial to the performance of the inductor. However, at micron-level stack sizes, such control is a significant challenge.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention provide techniques for fabricating improved magnetic material stacks via surface roughness control. While such magnetic material stacks are well-suited for use in forming magnetic inductor structures (e.g., yoke inductors), they can alternatively be used in forming a variety of other electronic structures.
For example, in one embodiment, a method for fabricating a magnetic material stack on a substrate comprises the following steps. A first dielectric layer is formed. A first magnetic material layer is formed on the first dielectric layer. At least a second dielectric layer is formed on the first magnetic material layer. At least a second magnetic material layer is formed on the second dielectric layer. During one or more of the forming steps, a surface smoothing operation is performed to remove at least a portion of surface roughness on the layer being formed.
In another embodiment, a magnetic material stack comprises: a first dielectric layer; a first magnetic material layer on the first dielectric layer; at least a second dielectric layer on the first magnetic material layer; and at least a second magnetic material layer on the second dielectric layer. One or more surfaces of the formed layers are smoothed to remove at least a portion of surface roughness on the formed layer.
In yet another embodiment, a magnetic inductor structure comprises a substrate. A magnetic material stack is formed on the substrate. The magnetic material stack comprises: a first dielectric layer; a first magnetic material layer on the first dielectric layer; at least a second dielectric layer on the first magnetic material layer; and at least a second magnetic material layer on the second dielectric layer. One or more surfaces of the formed layers are smoothed to remove at least a portion of surface roughness on the formed layer. One or more conductive windings are positioned around the magnetic material stack.
Advantageously, illustrative embodiments improve the performance of magnetic inductor structures by controlling the surface roughness of one or more layers that form the magnetic material stack. More particularly, such surface roughness control techniques reduce magnetic loss and thereby improve inductor performance. Examples of such surface roughness control techniques comprise planarization and/or polishing.
Other embodiments will be described in the following detailed description of embodiments, which is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
Illustrative embodiments provide techniques for fabricating magnetic material stacks and magnetic inductor structures. More particularly, illustrative embodiments provide fabrication techniques that address problems with existing fabrication techniques such as, but not limited to, stack thickness control. Illustrative embodiments provide surface roughness control to minimize inductor performance problems such as magnetic loss. As mentioned above, magnetic loss is an important issue for magnetic material stacks in magnetic inductors. Illustrative embodiments realize that surface roughness can lead to damping loss which degrades overall inductor performance.
Surface roughness (or, more simply, roughness) is a component of surface texture, and is typically quantified by the deviations in the direction of the normal vector of a real surface from its ideal form. There are several ways to measure surface roughness according to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) standards.
One standard measure is known as Ra roughness. Ra roughness is the arithmetic average of the absolute values of the profile height deviations from the mean line, recorded within a given evaluation length. More simply, Ra is the average of a set of individual measurements of a surface's peaks and valleys. Another standard measure is known as Root Mean Square (RMS) roughness. RMS roughness is the root mean square average of the profile height deviations from the mean line, recorded within an evaluation length.
In an illustrative embodiment, a method is provided for forming improved magnetic material stacks for magnetic inductors by controlling surface roughness. RMS roughness for starting wafers for inductor fabrication just prior to magnetic material fabrication is about 0.5 nanometers (nm) in RMS roughness. Illustrative embodiments advantageously realize that a combination of a deposition process and a chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) process can be used to reduce the RMS roughness, e.g., to about 0.08 nm RMS roughness. The RMS roughness of a typical amorphous magnetic material such as cobalt-iron-boron (CoFeB) is about 0.23 nm in RMS roughness and the spacer dielectric material is about 0.2 nm in RMS roughness for low temperature silicon dioxide. Although the RMS roughness for roughness for Co-based magnetic materials (for example, CoZrTa, CoZr, CoZrNb, CoZrMo, FeCoAlN, CoP, FeCoP, CoPw, CoBW, CoHf, CoNb, CoW, CoTi, FeCoN, FeTaN, FeCoBSi, FeNi, CoZrO, CoFeHfO, CoFeAlO, and CoFeSiO2) and the dielectric spacer can be relatively smooth, the number of alternating film layers in the stack can be high, i.e., 20 or more, and the roughness of each layer is additive. Thus, after 10 or more layers, the RMS roughness can be about 2.0 nm or higher and can have a profound negative effect on the magnetic loss for the inductor. Illustrative embodiments provide techniques for controlling such surface roughness. Note that surface roughness quantities described below are illustratively measured in RMS roughness. However, Ra roughness or some other surface roughness measure can alternatively be used.
It is to be understood that embodiments discussed herein are not limited to the particular materials, features, and processing steps shown and described herein. In particular, with respect to fabrication (forming or processing) steps, it is to be emphasized that the descriptions provided herein are not intended to encompass all of the steps that may be used to form a functional integrated circuit device. Rather, certain steps that are commonly used in fabricating such devices are purposefully not described herein for economy of description.
Moreover, the same or similar reference numbers are used throughout the drawings to denote the same or similar features, elements, layers, regions, or structures, and thus, a detailed explanation of the same or similar features, elements, layers, regions, or structures will not be repeated for each of the drawings. It is to be understood that the terms “about,” “approximately” or “substantially” as used herein with regard to thicknesses, widths, percentages, ranges, etc., are meant to denote being close or approximate to, but not exactly. For example, the term “about” or “substantially” as used herein implies that a small margin of error is present such as, by way of example only, 1% or less than the stated amount. Also, in the figures, the illustrated scale of one layer, structure, and/or region relative to another layer, structure, and/or region is not necessarily intended to represent actual scale.
Note that the same reference numeral (100) is used to denote the schematic illustrating the process through the various intermediate fabrication stages illustrated in
As shown in
Turning now to
Next, a process for reducing the roughness on the surface of the first dielectric layer 104 is performed, the result of which is illustrated in
Following the CMP process depicted in
As illustrated in
Turning now to
Thus, after several layers of deposition and despite performing CMP on one or more of the dielectric layers, the roughness from each layer of magnetic material and dielectric material adds up, as illustrated in
Thick yoke inductors can be formed comprising the low loss thick magnetic material stack 112. In an illustrative embodiment, a plurality of inductors can be formed from the thick magnetic material stack 112 shown in
As shown, the magnetic material stack 112 (and hard mask 120) is removed in all locations that are not below one of the set of resist images 122-1, 122-2 . . . 122-n. As such, multiple magnetic material stacks 112-1, 112-2 . . . 112-n are formed, respectively, below resist image 122-1 and hard mask 120-1, below resist image 122-2 and hard mask 120-2, and below resist image 122-n and hard mask 120-n. The stacks may be used as part of some other electronic structures, such as independent low loss inductors, as will be further illustrated in
One distinction between the structure in
In
A top layer of inductor windings 236, illustrated in
A perspective view taken along line A-A in
In an alternative embodiment, one or more of the dielectric layers of the magnetic material stack 112 (e.g., 104, 108, 110, etc.) or 212 can, itself, be formed as a multi-layer structure. In one example, the multi-layer structure is a bi-layer structure comprised of a first dielectric sub layer and a second dielectric sub layer. Thus, one or more of the dielectric layers (films) that separate the magnetic material layers in the magnetic material stack can have a bi-layer formation. In one illustrative embodiment, each of the dielectric layers in the stack is formed as a bi-layer dielectric structure as described herein. The formation of such a bi-layer dielectric structure is illustrated in
It is to be understood that the processing steps shown in
As shown in
Illustrative embodiments realize that the surface of the dielectric material (e.g., SiO2, SiN, etc.) of layer 304-1 may become so smooth after CMP that magnetic material deposited thereon does not adhere as well as desired to form to the magnetic material stack. This is because it is realized herein that magnetic material, such as, for example, a cobalt-based magnetic material, may not always adequately adhere to extremely smooth oxide or nitride surfaces. Thus, in
It is to be appreciated that, in one illustrative embodiment, the bottom dielectric sub layer 304-1 is about 10 nm to about 100 nm prior to the smoothing operation, the smoothing operation only removes the surface roughness and the bulk material is not removed during the process. The surface roughness after the smoothing operation is less than 0.1 nm in RMS roughness, then the second (top) dielectric sub layer 304-2 can be about 3 nm to about 10 nm in thickness. In one illustrative embodiment, acceptable roughness is about 0.2 nm in RMS roughness or less, while about 0.8 nm in RMS roughness or higher is unacceptable.
Note that the two sub layers 304-1 and 304-2 comprise a dielectric layer 304. Then, as shown in
It is to be understood that the methods discussed herein for fabricating semiconductor structures can be incorporated within semiconductor processing flows for fabricating other types of semiconductor devices and integrated circuits with various analog and digital circuitry or mixed-signal circuitry. In particular, integrated circuit dies can be fabricated with various devices such as transistors, diodes, capacitors, inductors, etc. An integrated circuit in accordance with embodiments can be employed in applications, hardware, and/or electronic systems. Suitable hardware and systems for implementing the invention may include, but are not limited to, personal computers, communication networks, electronic commerce systems, portable communications devices (e.g., cell phones), solid-state media storage devices, functional circuitry, etc. Systems and hardware incorporating such integrated circuits are considered part of the embodiments described herein.
Furthermore, various layers, regions, and/or structures described above may be implemented in integrated circuits (chips). The resulting integrated circuit chips can be distributed by the fabricator in raw wafer form (that is, as a single wafer that has multiple unpackaged chips), as a bare die, or in a packaged form. In the latter case, the chip is mounted in a single chip package (such as a plastic carrier, with leads that are affixed to a motherboard or other higher level carrier) or in a multichip package (such as a ceramic carrier that has either or both surface interconnections or buried interconnections). In any case, the chip is then integrated with other chips, discrete circuit elements, and/or other signal processing devices as part of either (a) an intermediate product, such as a motherboard, or (b) an end product. The end product can be any product that includes integrated circuit chips, ranging from toys and other low-end applications to advanced computer products having a display, a keyboard or other input device, and a central processor.
Although illustrative embodiments have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 15/281,466 filed on Sep. 30, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,283,249.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4640871 | Hayashi et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
5032945 | Argyle et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5763108 | Chang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6346336 | Nago | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6441715 | Johnson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6479212 | Matsuda | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492708 | Acosta et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6573148 | Bothra | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6650220 | Sia et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6720230 | Acosta et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7107666 | Hiatt et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7463131 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7719084 | Gardner et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
RE41581 | Davies | Aug 2010 | E |
7867787 | Gardner et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8102236 | Fontana, Jr. et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8717136 | Fontana, Jr. et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8754500 | Webb | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9035422 | Khanolkar et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9047890 | Herget | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9064628 | Fontana, Jr. et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9383418 | Mohan et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9697948 | Osada et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9859357 | Deligianni et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
10283249 | Deligianni | May 2019 | B2 |
20010050607 | Gardner | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020114932 | Yoshikawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130386 | Acosta et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030005572 | Gardner | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029520 | Ingvarsson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030200295 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030213615 | Utsumi et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040219328 | Tasaki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040229082 | Lee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244191 | Orr et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050093437 | Ouyang | May 2005 | A1 |
20060091958 | Bhatti et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070030659 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080003699 | Gardner et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090007418 | Edo et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090219754 | Fukumoto | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100000780 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019332 | Taylor | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100087066 | O'Sullivan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110175193 | Nakagawa | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120087179 | Jung | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120236528 | Le et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120267733 | Hu et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120299137 | Worledge | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130106552 | Fontana, Jr. et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130224887 | Lee et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130314192 | Fontana, Jr. et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130316503 | Doris et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140021426 | Lee et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140061853 | Webb | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140159850 | Roy et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140190003 | Fontana, Jr. et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140216939 | Fontana, Jr. et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140239443 | Gallagher et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140339653 | Chang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150048918 | Park et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150097267 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150109088 | Kim et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150171157 | Sturcken et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150279545 | Fazelpour et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160005527 | Park et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160035816 | Hong et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160086721 | Park et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160126008 | Sturcken | May 2016 | A1 |
20170229643 | Chen et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170256708 | Krounbi et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180005740 | Doris et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180005741 | Doris et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180019295 | Deligianni et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180047805 | Deligianni et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104485325 | Apr 2015 | CN |
0636934 | Jun 1994 | JP |
2006178395 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2010080774 | Apr 2010 | JP |
5096278 | Dec 2012 | JP |
100998962 | Dec 2010 | KR |
0195619 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2004068515 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2018002736 | Jan 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
E.J. O'Sullivan et al., “Developments in Integrated On-Chip Inductors with Magnetic Yokes,” The Electrochemical Society, Apr. 2012, Abstract #3407, 1 page. |
K. Van Schuylenbergh et al., “On-Chip Out-of-Plane High-Q Inductors,” IEEE Lester Eastman Conference on High Performance Devices at University of Delaware, Aug. 2002, pp. 364-373. |
E.J. O'Sullivan et al., “Developments in Integrated On-Chip Inductors with Magnetic Yokes,” ECS Transactions, Mar. 2013, pp. 93-105, vol. 50, No. 10. |
Nimit Chomnawang, “Three-Dimensional Micromachined On-Chip Inductors for High Frequency Applications,” A Dissertation, The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dec. 2002, 195 pages. |
E.J. O'Sullivan et al., “New Developments in Magnetic inductors for On-Chip Power Conversion, Including Fabrication,” Prime, Oct. 2-7, 2016, 2 pages, Hawaii. |
M.-Z. Yang et al., “Manufacture and Characterization of High Q-Factor Inductors Based on CMOS-MEMS Techniques,” Sensors, Oct. 19. 2011, 9 pages, vol. 11. |
M.-H., Chang, “A Study of On-Chip Solenoid Inductors for High Frequency Applications,” 8th Biennial International Symposium on Communications (ISCOM), Nov. 2005, 4 pages. |
H. Namba et al., “On-Chip Vertically Coiled Solenoid Inductors and Transformers for RF SoC Using 90nm CMOS Interconnect Technology,” IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC), Jun. 2011, 4 pages. |
List of IBM Patents or Patent Applications Treated as Related. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190206619 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15281466 | Sep 2016 | US |
Child | 16291807 | US |