Method for fixating sludges and soils contaminated with mercury and other heavy metals

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6911570
  • Patent Number
    6,911,570
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 28, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 28, 2005
    19 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to a method, composition and apparatus for stabilizing mercury and other heavy metals present in a particulate material such that the metals will not leach from the particulate material. The method generally involves the application of a metal reagent, a sulfur-containing compound, and the addition of oxygen to the particulate material, either through agitation, sparging or the addition of an oxygen-containing compound.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This application is directed generally to techniques for stabilizing mercury and other heavy metals and specifically to techniques for stabilizing mercury and other heavy metals that are dispersed throughout a particulate material.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A serious environmental problem worldwide is the contamination of particulate materials, such as soils, sediments, fly ash, carbon and sludges, with toxic substances and/or radioactive substances, particularly from industrial applications. It is not uncommon to find particulate materials that are contaminated with numerous heavy metals and are also radioactively contaminated with radionuclides. There are known health risks to the public and to the environment that are associated with various heavy metals, including but not limited to mercury.


A thermal retort system, followed by stabilization of the recovered mercury, is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Best Demonstrable Available Technology for treating contaminated particulate materials having greater than 260 ppm of mercury. A thermal retort system is typically comprised of a vacuum heating unit and distillation/condensation systems to recover metallic mercury from salts, solid objects, soils and coproducts from other facility processes. An example of a thermal retort system is shown in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Demonstration Bulletin, EPA/540/MR-02/078, November 1992, which is incorporated by reference herein. These devices produce a semi-pure metallic mercury liquid which is resold directly or sent to a triple distillation process for further purification. The triple distillation process uses a vacuum distillation system to remove traces of impurities from metallic mercury so it can be resold as pure “technical grade” mercury. In cases where radioactive contaminated solids are treated, recovered mercury must be amalgamated prior to disposal as described in 40 C.F.R. § 268.42 Table 1. Thermal retorts, though effective, have drawbacks, namely a low throughput of waste handling capacity, a high capital and operating cost, and the potential for harmful off gases which must also be treated. Given that the mercury is heated to vaporization and then condensed, the possibility for mercury to escape or emit in an off gas from a thermal retort process is high.


Due to the high costs and emission problems associated with thermal retorts, other non-thermal (chemical) techniques have been attempted, with varying degrees of success, for stabilizing mercury and other heavy metals in particulate materials. For example, powdered zinc has been used to collect liquid elemental mercury in soils. Once the mercury is collected on the metal, liquid sulfur (polysulfide) is used to react with the mercury to form mercuric sulfide. However, zinc is an environmentally regulated metal as it maybe leached from the waste during the Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). Moreover, the prior art is focused on stabilizing mercury in aqueous waste streams. These treatments do not address the treatment of particulate materials contaminated with mercury, and may not be effective in treating particulate materials for many reasons. For example, the difference in the properties of an aqueous stream are vastly different from those of a solid or particulate material.


Another chemical method used to stabilize liquid elemental mercury was described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/258,659 (about to issue) for stabilizing waste liquid elemental mercury, incorporated by reference herein. In this method, a combination of powdered sulfur and liquid sulfur (polysulfide) were used to react with the elemental mercury to form black mercuric sulfide (meta-cinnabar). However, merely placing elemental mercury in a bed of sulfur or in a volume of polysulfide does not yield the desired mercuric sulfide reaction. Sufficient heat must be available to overcome the energy of activation for the reaction to occur. In this method, intense mixing provided the necessary energy to initiate the reaction. Sufficient heat was generated from the reaction to escalate the rate at which mercuric sulfide was formed. In some instances, it was necessary to add water to the mixture in order to cool the reactants and control the reaction.


Attempts to use chemical methods on soils and sludges spiked with elemental mercury have largely been unsuccessful. These methods were generally ineffective in stabilizing mercury for two reasons. First, heat provided by mixing action or generated from the mercury-sulfur reaction quickly dissipates throughout the surrounding matrix materials, so it is difficult to overcome the energy of activation and initiate the mercury-sulfur reaction not just locally but throughout the entire reaction mass. Second, mercury in soils is not a continuous phase, as is the case when treating liquid elemental mercury. Chemical stabilization of mercury and other heavy metals in solid materials is difficult because of the dispersed nature of the contaminant within the solid matrix and the consequent problem of contacting a stabilizing chemical additive(s) with such a widely dispersed contaminant. Distance between the reaction sites is great enough to prevent the reaction from propagating from one site to another.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The technology described in this invention was developed for the purpose of stabilizing, mercury compounds and other heavy metals in solid wastes and soils. The technology is particularly effective in treating those wastes contaminated with more than about 260 parts per million (ppm) mercury as well as contaminated with other heavy metals such as arsenic, barium cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium, and silver. The present invention can solve the problems of the earlier methodologies for attempting to stabilize mercury and other heavy metals that are present in particulate materials. The present invention can provide a way to stabilize at least most, if not all, of the mercury or heavy metals, even if those metals are dispersed throughout the particulate material. The invention can directly stabilize the mercury-contaminated waste and is a feasible technical alternative to thermal retort. The invention may also be available as a regulatory alternative to thermal retort. Besides being easier and more cost-effective, the approach is more technically sound for many wastes, especially those that are co-contaminated with heavy metals and radionuclides. Radionuclides are those radioactive elements or compounds with a half-life of greater than six months. Examples of such radionuclides include but are not limited to various isotopes of cesium, strontium, uranium, plutonium, sodium, nickel, iron, iodine and potassium. A fairly comprehensive list of radionuclides is found in Appendix C of the EPA's Soil Screening Guidance for Radionuclides: User's Guide, published October 2000, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference. A major advantage to the present invention is the lower risk of fugitive emissions which are typically associated with thermal treatments.


While not wishing to bound by any theory, in one embodiment, the present invention provides a method of stabilizing mercury and other heavy metals in a particulate material comprising, sequentially or simultaneously, contacting a metal reagent with the particulate material to amalgamate with the mercury present in the particulate material, contacting a sulfur-containing compound with the particulate material to form an insoluble metal sulfide and agitating the various additives and the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material in order to assist the sulfur-containing compound to form the insoluble metal sulfide. The metal reagent is preferably any metal from Groups 1B, 2B, 4B and 4A of the Periodic Table of Elements. The sulfur-containing compound is preferably any sulfur-containing compound that will disassociate enough in the particulate material to allow the sulfur to participate in chemical reactions to form an insoluble metal sulfide.


The invention can be modified in a number of ways. For example, a dispersing agent can be contacted with the particulate material to emulsify oils associated with the particulate material. The dispersing agent is preferably any surfactant or detergent. As a second example of a modification to the invention, an activator can be also contacted with the metal reagent, typically before the metal reagent is added to the particulate material, to remove any oxides that may have formed on the surface of the metal reagent. The activator is preferably a mineral acid or salt thereof. Thirdly, an iron-containing compound can be contacted with the particulate material to react with any excess sulfides that may remain in the particulate material following the addition of the sulfur-containing compound. The iron-containing compound is preferably any compound with iron that will disassociate enough in the particulate material to allow the iron to bind with the excess sulfides. The particulate material can also be impregnated with gaseous oxygen, as an alternative to or in addition to, agitating the particulate material in an oxygen-containing atmosphere to enhance the reactions occurring in the particulate material. In addition to or alternatively to admixing the particulate material in an oxygen-containing atmosphere, an oxygen-containing compound can be applied to the particulate material to provide the oxygen needed for the reactions to occur. The oxygen-containing compound is preferably any compound with oxygen that will disassociate enough in the particulate material to allow the oxygen to participate in the reactions between the mercury, the heavy metals and the sulfides.


The invention also comprises a composition that can be used to stabilize mercury and other heavy metals in the particulate material that includes one or more of the additives noted above. For example, the composition can include the metal reagent, the sulfur-containing compound, and/or the oxygen-containing compound. The composition can further include an iron-containing compound. The present invention also comprises a composition of the resultant stabilized material that will follow from the implementation of the method of the invention. The present invention also describes an apparatus that allows the method of the invention to be implemented. These and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following best mode description, the drawings and the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The FIGURE which follows depicts an embodiment of the invention, and may depict various alternative embodiments. The invention is not limited to the embodiment or embodiments depicted herein since even further various alternative embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.


The FIGURE is a flowchart of one of the embodiments of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

At the outset, it should be understood that this invention comprises a method of stabilizing mercury and other heavy metals in a particulate material. The description which follows describes various embodiments of the invention, and various alternative embodiments. It should be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, however, that various other alternative embodiments may be accomplished without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.


The present invention generally describes a method of stabilizing mercury and other heavy metals in a particulate material. The particulate material is preferably one or more of a number of different materials including but not limited to soils, dirt, sludges, solid wastes, sands, or any material with a solids content greater than about fifty weight percent and, more preferably, greater than about eighty weight percent and/or a liquid content of no more than about fifty weight percent and more preferably of not more than about twenty weight percent.


The particulate material typically includes mercury and/or other heavy metals, either as elements or compounds with other substances, and radionuclides. The particulate material will generally have more than 260 ppm mercury, since below that level no treatment is regulated, under current regulations. Generally, the particulate material contains no more than about 100,000 ppm mercury; more than about 5,000 ppm heavy metals and even more generally from about 300 to 1,000 ppm heavy metals (other than mercury). The amount of radionuclides present in the particulate material does not affect the method of the invention.


Embodiments of the method of the present invention are shown in the FIGURE. It should be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the compounds, other than the iron containing compound, to be added to the particulate material, as described below, can be added either separately or simultaneously. The iron containing compound should be added as a final step to bind any excess sulfides that may be remaining from the previous reactions.


The reactions described below are usually conducted at ambient temperatures, approximately 65 to 85 degrees Fahrenheit. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that temperature can influence the reactions between the contaminants in the particulate material and the various stabilizing additives described below. The effect of temperature on the reactions is discussed herein.


Metal Reagent


As shown in the FIGURE, the metal reagent 20 is added, in step 12, to the particulate material 10 and admixed or agitated 14 for a period of time. The temperature of the particulate material will influence the reaction time and the mixing time by enhancing the reactions between the various components of the particulate material. In an embodiment, this period of time can range from a few minutes to a few hours, dependent on the size and amount of the material to be admixed. In an embodiment, for a 1 kilogram batch, the mixing time following the addition of the metal regent is approximately one hour. The metal reagent has, at this point, reacted with the dispersed mercury and other heavy metals in the particulate material.


While not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that the ionic mercury reaction is an amalgamation reaction according to the following equations:
Hg+2+2e-Hg-2M2M+2+4e-M+2+Hg+2+2e-M(Hg)Hg+2+2MM+2+M(Hg)


where M is a divalent metal. It is also believed that the elemental mercury reactions are as follows:
MM+2+2e-Hg++M+2+2e-M(Hg)Hg++MM(Hg)


again, where M is a divalent metal.


Metal Reagent Description


The metal reagent 20 can be any form of an elemental metal chosen from Groups 1B, 2B, 4B, and 4A in the Periodic Table of Elements. In one embodiment, the metal reagent is an elemental form of zinc, tin, copper, titanium, lead, or mixtures thereof. It is also believed that compounds of these various forms are suitable for use in the invention; however, the compounds must disassociate enough to allow the metal to amalgamate with the mercury. Thus, suitable compounds may include but are not limited to tin chloride, zinc sulfate, or copper sulfate. Even though these metals will amalgamate or form a compound with mercury, it should be noted that the amounts of most of these metals that can be present in particulate materials is regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Thus, in one embodiment, the metal reagent is preferably tin, since tin is one of the few metals that will amalgamate with mercury that is not regulated under RCRA.


Amount of Metal Reagent


The amount of metal reagent to be added to the particulate material is based on the amount of particulate material to be treated and the mercury content of the material. In one embodiment of the method of the present invention, the amount of metal reagent to be added is in the range of approximately 0.4 weight percent to approximately 2.0 weight percent of the particulate material. In another embodiment, the amount of metal reagent added to the particulate range is approximately 0.6 weight percent of the particulate material. As an example, for a 1 kilogram batch of the particulate material to be treated, between about 4 grams of metal reagent to 20 grams of metal reagent is added to the particulate material batch.


Mixing of the Particulate Material


The mixing of the particulate material with the sulfur-containing compound and the metal reagent in a molecular oxygen-containing atmosphere, in addition to entraining oxygen in the particulate material, allows the distribution of the reagent and the sulfur-containing compound throughout the particulate material, thus permitting the metal reagent and sulfur-containing compound to reach more of the dispersed mercury and other heavy metals. The oxygen-containing atmosphere should contain at least 21 volume percent of gaseous oxygen and more preferably contains from about 20 to about 100 volume percent gaseous oxygen. It should be noted, however, the use of oxygen at the higher volume percent described herein should be carefully monitored to ensure that the oxygen does not oxidize the sulfur-containing compounds to sulfates and render them unsuitable for use in the reactions described herein. In addition, use of oxygen at the higher volume percentages may not be financially feasible, although it may be technically feasible.


The mixing of the particulate material should be fairly vigorous in order to lessen the amount of time that the mixture should be agitated. It should be understood by one of skill in the art that as the vigor of the mixing decreases, the time that the material should be mixed increases. Thus, to accomplish the reactions in a preferred amount of time, the material should be mixed at various speeds and intensity. In one embodiment, the mixture is agitated for approximately an hour following the addition of the metal reagent. In this same embodiment, the sulfur-containing compound is then added to the mixture and the mixture is agitated for approximately two hours. The agitation, in this embodiment, that occurs is such that the material is at least being turned over. An agitation index of 0 means that there is no perceptible stirring or movement with the mixture, whereas an agitation index of 10 means the mixture is stirred at a very high and rapid degree of mixing and agitation. Table I shows the qualitative characteristics of the 0-10 agitation index. This Table I has also appeared in U.S. Pat. No. 6,284,005.









TABLE I







Agitation Index








Agitation Index
Description





 1
static, no movement or mixing


 2


 3
turnover of sludge, but not all solids held in suspension


 4


 5
mild turnover of sludge with all solids held in suspension


 6


 7
rolling surface with quick turnover and quick absorption



of dry material into mass of slurry


 8


 9
violent turbulent movement of all slurry in entire vessel


10
degradation or mechanical fracturing of material









Thus, the mixture is preferably agitated at an agitation index of at least 5 and, more preferably, agitated at a level of about 5 to about 9.


Sulfur-Containing Compound


Following the mixing of the particulate material and the metal reagent in step 14, as shown in the embodiment demonstrated by the FIGURE, the sulfur-containing compound 22 is added, in step 16, to the particulate material. The sulfur-containing compound, the amalgamated metal/mercury complex, and the particulate material are admixed or agitated, in step 18, for a period of time. The mixture is preferably agitated at an agitation index of at least 5 and, more preferably, agitated at a level of about 5 to about 9. The temperature of the particulate material will influence the reaction time and the mixing time by enhancing the reactions. In one embodiment, this period of time can range from a few minutes to a few hours, dependent on the size and amount of the material to be admixed. In another embodiment of the method of the present invention, for a 1 kilogram batch, the sulfur-containing compound is admixed in an oxygen-containing atmosphere with the particulate material and the amalgamated metal/mercury complex for approximately two hours. At the end of the period of time, an insoluble metal sulfide has formed and the mercury and other heavy metals are stabilized and will not leach from the particulate material.


Form and Amount of the Sulfur-Containing Compound


The sulfur-containing compound can be any sulfur-containing compound. In one embodiment, the sulfur-containing compound is sulfide or polysulfide. A sulfide is sulfur with a negative 2 state. Polysulfides are generally defined as many sulfides chemically bound together. In addition, other sulfur-containing compounds such as hydrogen sulfide, dimethylthiolcarbamate, diethylthiolcarbamate sodium sulfide, or sodium thiosulfate, can be used. In one embodiment, the sulfur-containing compound is calcium polysulfide. The amount of polysulfide to be added to the amalgamated metal/mercury complex or complexes that have formed as a result of the addition of the metal reagent to the particulate material is dependent on the amount of mercury that is present in the particulate material. The relationship between the amount of mercury present and the amount of polysulfide to be added is typically not a direct ratio. In one embodiment, the amount of polysulfide to be added is in a range of approximately 1.0 mole to approximately 2.0 moles per mol of mercury for a metals concentration in the range of about 300 ppm to about 1000 ppm, whereas the amount of polysulfide is in a range of approximately 2.0 moles to approximately 3.0 moles per mol of mercury for a metals concentration in the range of about 1000 ppm to about 5000 ppm. In another embodiment, the amount of polysulfide to be added, for an average mercury concentration of about 17000 ppm, is 2.5 mole per mole of mercury while, for an average mercury concentration of about 5000 ppm, 1.7 moles of polysulfide per mol of mercury should be added.


In an alternate embodiment of the invention, excess sodium diethylthiolcarbamate, or another complexing agent, is added to the mixture in the event that some mercury becomes disassociated at some future point. The mercury could become disassociated from the sulfide if the material was stored in a highly acidic or basic environment. Having excess complexing agent in the material will bind the mercury before the mercury can leach from the material.


Excess Sulfides and the Iron-Containing Compound


Often, excess unreacted sulfides or polysulfides will remain in the particulate material once the insoluble metal sulfide has formed. Since sulfides are often regulated by many environmental regulations, the excess sulfides may need to be reacted with reactive metal(s) in the particulate material. Thus, the invention can further be modified by adding an iron-containing compound 32 to the particulate material 10 wherein the iron-containing compound will react with any excess sulfides that may have formed in the particulate material from the particulate material by binding to the excess sulfides to create an insoluble iron sulfide. The iron-containing compound should be admixed with the various additives described above and the particulate materials. The mixture is preferably agitated, in step 34, at an agitation index of at least 5 and, more preferably, agitated at a level of about 5 to about 9. The temperature of the particulate material will influence the reactions by enhancing the reaction.


Form and Amount of the Iron-Containing Compound


The iron-containing compound can be any compound that will allow iron to disassociate and bind with any excess sulfides that may be present in the particulate material to form an insoluble ferric sulfide. In one embodiment, the iron-containing compound can be elemental iron, ferric sulfate, ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate, or any compound that behave similarly to those listed. In another embodiment, the iron-containing compound is preferably ferric sulfate. The amount of iron-containing compound to be added to the particulate material is dependent on the pH of the treatment slurry (the particulate material plus the various additives to this point). In one embodiment, the amount of iron-containing compound is in the range of approximately 25 grams of 10 percent ferric chloride per kilogram of particulate material. In another embodiment, the amount of iron-containing compound is about 125 grams of 5 percent ferric chloride per 20 kilograms of particulate material.


Chemical Reactions Occurring and pH Level of the Particulate Material


Although the inventors do not wish to be tied to any one theory of the chemical reactions which are occurring the particulate material due to the additions of the various compounds described above, the following reactions are believed to be occurring in the stabilization of the mercury:
M(Hg)M+HgS-2S+2e-Hg+SHgS2e-+H2O+1/2O22OH-M(Hg)+S-2+H2O+1/2O2M+HgS+2OH-


where the M is a divalent metal. It is also believed that the excess sulfide reactions are as follows:
FeCl3+4H2O[HydratedIronOxide]+n+(3-n)H++3Cl-OH-+H+H2O2Fe+3+2e-2Fe+2S-2S+2e-Fe+2+SFeS2Fe+3+2S-2FeS+Fe+2+S-2Fe+2+S-2FeS2Fe+3+2S-22FeS


Due to the additions of these various compounds and additives, the pH level of the particulate material changes throughout the various additions that are made to the particulate material according to the method of the invention. The pH level of the particulate materials, at the beginning of the process, is typically in a range of about 4.0 to about 8.0. Following the addition of the metal reagent, the pH level of the particulate material maintains approximately the same pH of about 4 to about 8. Following the addition of the sulfur-containing compound, the pH level of the particulate material typically increases to the range of about 8 to about 11. The iron-containing compound is added until the pH level of the particulate material reverts to approximately a neutral level. An acid/base can be added to the particulate material once the above additions have been made to allow the particulate material to approach a neutral level.


Impregnation of the Particulate Material with Oxygen


The above invention can be modified to include impregnating the particulate material with gaseous or liquid oxygen, as an alternative to or addition to, agitating the particulate material in an oxygen-containing atmosphere. The ways in which oxygen is impregnated into the particulate material are many, well known to one of ordinary skill in the art and contemplated by the present invention. In one embodiment, if the particulate material is being treated in a mixer, the oxygen is impregnated into the particulate material through a sparge line which will pump oxygen directly into the particulate material while the particulate material is being agitated.


Dispersing Agent


Under the principles of the present invention, one embodiment of the invention includes adding a dispersing agent 36 to the particulate material to emulsify any oils, such as diesel oils or PCBs, that may be present. In one embodiment, the dispersing agent is a surfactant or detergent. In another embodiment of the invention using the dispersing agent, the dispersing agent can be any industrial strength surfactant. The purpose of the addition of the dispersing agent is to neutralize an oils that may be present in the contaminated particulate material. The amount of the dispersing agent to be added is dependent on the amount of oils present in the particulate material. As an example, for a 1 kilogram batch of particulate material having 100 ppm of oils, 1.5 grams of dispersing agent should be added.


Activator


The invention can also be modified by treating the metal reagent with an activator 38 before adding the metal reagent to the particulate material as described above. While not wishing to be bound to any theory, it is believed that the activator cleans the surface of the metal reagent by removing metal oxide compounds that may accumulate on the surface of such compounds. The inventors have noticed that the metal reagent appears to be more reactive when treated with an activator prior to being admixed with the contaminated particulate material. The activator contemplated by the present invention can be any compound that will perform the function of removing oxidation from the metal reagent. In one embodiment, the activator is a mineral acid or salt thereof. In another embodiment, the activator can be sulfamic acid, sulfamidic acid, sulfonic acid, sulfinic acid, or sulfenic acid or any compounds that behave similarly to those listed. In a further embodiment, the activator is preferably sulfamic acid. The amount of activator to be used is preferably just enough to remove the oxidation on the metal reagent without destroying the metal reagent. The amount of activator for treating a gram of metal reagent is preferably in the range of about 0.1 grams of activator per gram of metal to 0.3 grams of activator per gram of metal. More preferably, the amount of activator for treating a gram of metal reagent is about 0.3 grams of activator to gram of metal.


The effectiveness of the invention is demonstrated by the following examples. However, it should be understood that the following examples do not define the scope of the invention; they are presented merely to demonstrate the effectiveness of the invention.


EXAMPLE 1

The present invention was demonstrated by testing seven soil samples taken from a mixed (radioactive and hazardous) waste field which contained numerous heavy metal wastes, including but not limited to mercury, dispersed throughout the soil. The soil samples were treated in 1-kilogram batches using a Kitchen-Aid double planetary mixer with a whisk attachment. The mixing that occurred was at least above 5 of the agitation index described above. A metal reagent was added to each of the soil samples, except sample 1. The metal reagent, in some samples, was treated with an activator, as shown in Table II below. In some soil samples, a wetting agent, elemental sulfur and polysulfides were added to the soil sample. The results of these experiments are shown in Table II.









TABLE II







Mixed Waste Field Demonstration Results










Reagents Added (g/kg Soil)
TCLP











Dispersing

Results













Mix
Metal
Activator
Sulfur
Agent
Polysulfide
(ppb)
















1
 0 g Zn
0 g
250 g
1.5 g
 85 g
7,160


2
25 g Zn
8 g
250 g
1.5 g
 85 g
18.3


3
25 g Zn
8 g
250 g
1.5 g
150 g
25.8


4
10 g Zn
3 g
250 g
1.5 g
 85 g
9.81


5
10 g Zn
3 g
250 g
1.5 g
 85 g
5.23


6
10 g Zn
3 g
 0 g
  0 g
 85 g
8.59


7
12 g Sn
4 g
 0 g
  0 g
 85 g
2.11









The regulatory limit, or Universal Treatment Standard, for mercury in a material is less than 25 micrograms of leachable mercury in the TCLP solution of the treated waste. It is clear from the above table that the present invention consistently and effectively produced a TCLP lower than the standard. Although the addition of the wetting agent and the elemental sulfur resulted in a reduction of the leachable mercury especially with reference to Tests #4, 5, and 6, the above table shows that an embodiment of the invention does not require the use of either a wetting agent or elemental sulfur, although an alternate embodiment of the invention allows the use of both compounds.


EXAMPLE 2

The presence of other heavy metals in at least one of the soil samples used in Example 1 was analyzed before and after treatment. The results of the analysis are shown in Table III. The present invention also proved effective for stabilizing metals which fall under the Resource and Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) including, but not limited to: arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium, and silver. Table III shows the concentration of metals in the treated and untreated soils, and the applicable regulatory standard, called Universal Treatment Standard (UTS).









TABLE III







RCRA Metal TCLP Results













Untreated Soil
Treated Soil
UTS



RCRA Metal
(mg Hg/kg)
(mg Hg/kg)
(mg Hg/kg)
















Arsenic
4.25
<0.02
5.0



Barium
78.4
0.825
21



Cadmium
4.08
<0.003
0.11



Chromium
53.6
<0.0957
0.6



Lead
131
0.131
5.7



Selenium
Undetected
<0.03
5.7



Silver
9.66
<0.004
0.1










As is evident from the above table, the present invention will bring not only the mercury present in heavily contaminated soils and particulate materials below regulation levels, but the present invention will also bring the RCRA metals that are also usually present in such contaminated soils to below regulation levels as well. It is believed, although the inventors do not wish to held to one theory, that the sulfide bind to the RCRA metals in a similar fashion that the sulfide binds to the mercury to form an insoluble mercury-sulfide. Although tests have not been performed, it is believed that other heavy metals, other than those specifically mentioned herein, can be removed from soils and particulate materials in the same fashion.


The Compositions


Application Composition


The invention also comprises a composition that can be used to stabilize mercury and other heavy metals in the particulate material. The composition comprises a metal reagent, a sulfur-containing compound, and an oxygen-containing compound. The composition can further include an iron-containing compound. The composition can be admixed in order to apply one composition to the particulate material. However, the present invention also contemplates admixing the ingredients in different combinations to allow for more than one application of the ingredients of the composition to the particulate material. For example, the metal reagent and the sulfur-containing compound could be admixed and applied and the oxygen-containing compound and iron-containing compound can be applied separately.


Resultant Composition


The present invention also comprises a composition of the resultant stabilized material 40 that will follow from the implementation of the method of the invention. The resultant composition comprises an amalgamated metal reagent/heavy metal compound mixed with a sulfur-containing material, thus forming an insoluble metal sulfide. The form of the resultant composition can be further modified to produce a desired waste form or to comply with regulations regarding waste forms. If a granular waste form is desired or required, flow enhancing agents can be added. Examples of such flow enhancing agents are vermiculite, sawdust, ground corn cobs, kitty litter, or calcium carbonate, or calcium sulfate. If a monolithic waste form is desired or required, polymeric agents can be added to produce such a waste form. Examples of polymeric agents are epoxy, polymeric resin and melamine formaldehyde.


The Apparatus


The present invention also describes an apparatus that comprises means to apply the metal reagent and the sulfur-containing compound to the particulate material. The apparatus of the present further includes a means for mixing the particulate material, the metal reagent, and the sulfur-containing compound to the particulate material. The mixing means of the apparatus of the present invention can include any apparatus that will allow particulate material to be admixed with other compounds. This can include, but is not limited to, mixers, agitators, kneaders, blenders, grinders, ball mills, tumbling mills, crushers and disintegrators. Alternate embodiments of include a number of different applicators for applying the various ingredients of the composition of the present invention or a collector for collecting the particulate material into a mixing vessel to be treated and mixed. The apparatus of the present invention can also comprise means for impregnating the particulate material with oxygen including but not limited to a sparge or a nozzle and pump system. It should be understood that the invention also contemplates an apparatus that can be used either in a laboratory or in a quasi in situ setting. In a laboratory setting, the apparatus would comprise an applicator which could apply the metal reagent and/or the sulfur-containing compound to the particulate materials and a mixer. In one embodiment of the invention, there are more than one applicator, one for each of the various compounds that will be added to the particulate material. However, the present invention clearly contemplates adding all but the iron containing compound simultaneously. In another embodiment of the invention, a sparge line for incorporating oxygen into the particulate material is also contemplated.


In a quasi in situ setting, one embodiment includes a moveable platform, in some instances, remote-controlled, that has a collector for collecting the particulate material into a mixer and an applicator to allow the metal reagent and sulfur-containing compound to be applied to and mixed with the soil. In another embodiment of the invention, the moveable platform has an auger and an applicator such that the metal reagent and sulfur-containing compound can be applied to the particulate material such that the auger will mix the particulate material and distribute the metal reagent and sulfur-containing compound throughout the particulate material.


The principles, embodiments and modes of operation of the present invention have been described in the foregoing specification. The invention which is intended to be protected herein should not, however, be construed as limited to the particular forms disclosed, as these are to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. Variations and changes may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Accordingly, the foregoing best mode of carrying out the invention should be considered exemplary in nature and not as limiting to the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for stabilizing metals an a particulate material comprising the steps of: (a) contacting a metal reagent with the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) contacting a sulfur-containing compound with the particulate material; and (c) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material, wherein the metal reagent is selected from the group consisting of metal based elements from Group 1B, Group 2B, Group 4B, Group 4A and combinations thereof of the Periodic Table of Elements.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the metals in the particulate material that are to be stabilized are selected from the group consisting of mercury, arsenic, lead, zinc, barium, cadmium, chromium, selenium, silver and mixtures thereof.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the particulate material has a mercury content of greater than about 260 ppm.
  • 4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the particulate material is soil and further comprising the additional step of adding a dispersing agent to the soil.
  • 5. A method according to claim 1 comprising the additional step of treating the metal reagent with an activator.
  • 6. A method according to claim 1 comprising the additional step of adding an iron-containing compound to the particulate material to react with excess sulfides in the particulate material.
  • 7. A method according to claim 1 wherein the sulfur-containing compound is a dimethylthiolcarbamate, diethylthiolcarbamate, sulfide, polysulfide or mixtures thereof.
  • 8. A method according to claim 1 wherein the metal reagent is selected from the group consisting of zinc, tin, copper, titanium, lead and mixtures thereof.
  • 9. A method according to claim 1 wherein the metal reagent is tin.
  • 10. A method according to claim 5 wherein the activator is a mineral containing acid.
  • 11. A method according to claim 5 wherein the activator is a sulfur-containing acid.
  • 12. A method according to claim 5 wherein the activator is selected from the group consisting of sulfamic acid, sulfamidic acid, sulfonic acid, sulfinic acid, sulfenic acid, and mixtures thereof.
  • 13. A method according to claim 5 wherein the activator is sulfamic acid.
  • 14. A method according to claim 6 wherein a pH level of the particulate material is in a range of approximately pH 4 to pH 8.
  • 15. A method according to claim 14 wherein the pH level of the particulate material is raised following the addition of the sulfur-containing compound.
  • 16. A method according to claim 15 wherein the pH level of the particulate material is approximately neutral following the addition of the iron-containing compound.
  • 17. A method according to claim 1 wherein approximately 0.4 to 2.0 weight percent of the metal reagent is added per kilogram of particulate material.
  • 18. A method according to claim 1 wherein the sulfur-containing compound is added in an amount ranging from about 1.0 mole to about 2.0 mole of sulfur-containing compound per mole of mercury for a metals concentration in the range of about 300 ppm of metals to about 1000 ppm of metals.
  • 19. A method according to claim 1 wherein the sulfur-containing compound is added in the an amount ranging from about 2.0 mole to about 3.0 mole of sulfur-containing compound per mole of mercury for a metals concentration in the range of about 1000 ppm of metals to about 3000 ppm of metals.
  • 20. A method according to claim 1 wherein the particulate material is selected from the group consisting of soil, sand, dirt, sludge, solid wastes and mixtures thereof.
  • 21. A method according to claim 6 wherein the iron-containing compound is selected from the group consisting of elemental iron, ferric chloride, ferric sulfate, ferrous sulfate and mixtures thereof.
  • 22. A method according to claim 4 wherein the dispersing agent is a surfactant.
  • 23. A method according to claim 4 wherein the dispersing agent is a detergent.
  • 24. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate material comprising the steps of: a) treating a metal reagent with an activator; b) adding a dispersing agent to the particulate material; c) adding a metal reagent to the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; d) adding a sulfur-containing compound to the particulate material; e) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material; f) adding an iron-containing compound to the particulate material to react with excess sulfides in the particulate material.
  • 25. A method according to claim 24 wherein the metals in the particulate material that are to be stabilized are selected from the group consisting of mercury, arsenic, lead, zinc, barium, cadmium, chromium, selenium, silver and mixtures thereof.
  • 26. A method according to claim 24 wherein the particulate material has a mercury content of greater than about 260 ppm.
  • 27. A method according to claim 24 wherein the sulfur-containing compound is calcium sulfate, dithiolcarbomate, dimethylcarbomate, sulfide, polysulfide or and mixtures thereof.
  • 28. A method according to claim 24 wherein the metal reagent is selected from the group consisting of metal based elements from Group 1B, Group 2B, Group 4B, Group 4A and combinations thereof of the Periodic Table of Elements.
  • 29. A method according to claim 24 wherein the metal reagent is selected from the group consisting of zinc, tin, copper, titanium, lead and mixtures thereof.
  • 30. A method according to claim 24 wherein the metal reagent is tin.
  • 31. A method according to claim 24 wherein the activator is a mineral containing acid.
  • 32. A method according to claim 24 wherein the activator is a sulfur-containing acid.
  • 33. A method according to claim 24 wherein the activator is selected from the group consisting of sulfamic acid, sulfamidic acid, sulfonic acid, sulfinic acid, sulfenic acid and mixtures thereof.
  • 34. A method according to claim 24 wherein the activator is sulfamic acid.
  • 35. A method according to claim 24 wherein a pH level of the particulate material is in a range of approximately pH 4 to pH 8.
  • 36. A method according to claim 35 wherein the pH level of the particulate material is raised following the addition of the sulfur-containing compound.
  • 37. A method according to claim 36 wherein the pH level of the particulate material is approximately neutral following the addition of the iron-containing compound.
  • 38. A method according to claim 24 wherein approximately 0.4 to 2.0 weight percent of the metal reagent is added per kilogram of particulate material.
  • 39. A method according to claim 24 wherein the sulfur-containing compound is added in an amount ranging from about 1.0 mole to about 2.0 mole of sulfur-containing compound per mole of mercury for a metals concentration in the range of about 300 ppm of metals to about 1000 ppm of metals.
  • 40. A method according to claim 24 wherein the sulfur-containing compound is added in the an amount ranging from about 2.0 mole to about 3.0 mol of sulfur-containing compound per mole of mercury for a metals concentration in the range of about 1000 ppm of metals to about 5000 ppm of metals.
  • 41. A method according to claim 24 wherein the particulate material is selected from the group consisting of soil, sand, dirt, sludge, solid wastes and mixtures thereof.
  • 42. A method according to claim 24 wherein the iron-containing compound is selected from the group consisting of elemental iron, ferric sulfate, ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate and mixtures thereof.
  • 43. A method according to claim 24 wherein the dispersing agent is a surfactant.
  • 44. A method according to claim 24 wherein the dispersing agent is a detergent.
  • 45. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate compound comprising the steps of: (a) adding a metal reagent to the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) adding a sulfur-containing compound to the particulate material; (c) impregnating the particulate material with oxygen; (d) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material; and, (e) adding an iron-containing compound to the particulate to remove excess sulfides from the particulate material.
  • 46. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate compound comprising the steps of: (a) adding a metal reagent to the particulate material, said particulate material having a solid content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) adding a sulfur-containing compound to the particulate material; (c) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material; and, (d) adding an iron-containing compound to the particulate to remove excess sulfides from the particulate material.
  • 47. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate material comprising the steps of: (a) adding a dispersing agent to the particulate material; (b) adding a metal reagent to the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (c) adding a sulfur-containing compound to the particulate material; (d) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material; and, (e) adding an iron-containing compound to the particulate material to remove excess sulfides from the particulate material.
  • 48. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate material comprising the steps of: (a) adding a metal reagent to the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) adding a sulfur-containing compound to the particulate material; and, (c) impregnating the particulate material with oxygen, wherein the metal reagent is selected from the group consisting of metal based elements from Group 1B, Group 2B, Group 4B, Group 4A and combinations thereof of Periodic Table of Elements.
  • 49. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate material comprising the steps of: (a) contacting a metal reagent with the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) contacting a sulfur-containing compound with the particulate material; (c) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material; and (d) adding an iron-containing compound to the particulate material to react with excess sulfides in the particulate material.
  • 50. A method according to claim 49 wherein a pH level of the particulate material is in a range of approximately pH 4 to pH 8.
  • 51. A method according to claim 50 wherein the pH level of the particulate material is raised following the addition of the sulfur-containing compound.
  • 52. A method according to claim 49 wherein the pH level of the particulate material is approximately neutral following the addition of the iron-containing compound.
  • 53. A method according to claim 49 wherein the iron-containing compound is selected from the group consisting of elemental iron, ferric chloride, ferric sulfate, ferrous sulfate and mixtures thereof.
  • 54. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate material comprising the steps of: (a) contacting a metal reagent with the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) contacting a sulfur-containing compound with the particulate material; and (c) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material, wherein the metal reagent is selected from the group consisting of zinc, tin, copper, titanium, lead and mixtures thereof.
  • 55. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate material comprising the steps of: (a) contacting a metal reagent with the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) contacting a sulfur-containing compound with the particulate material; and (c) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material, wherein the metal reagent is tin.
  • 56. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate material comprising the steps of: (a) contacting a metal reagent with the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) contacting a sulfur-containing compound with the particulate material; (c) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material; and (d) treating the metal reagent with an activator, wherein the activator is selected from the group consisting of sulfamic acid, sulfamidic acid, sulfonic acid, sulfinic acid, sulfenic acid, and mixtures thereof.
  • 57. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate material comprising the steps of: (a) contacting a metal reagent with the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) contacting a sulfur-containing compound with the particulate material; (c) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material; and (d) treating the metal reagent with an activator, wherein the activator is sulfamic acid.
  • 58. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate material comprising the steps of: (a) contacting a metal reagent with the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) contacting a sulfur-containing compound with the particulate material; (c) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material, wherein the particulate material is soil; and (d) adding a dispersing agent to the soil wherein the dispersing agent is a surfactant.
  • 59. A method for stabilizing metals in a particulate material comprising the steps of: (a) contacting a metal reagent with the particulate material, said particulate material having a solids content of greater than about seventy-five weight percent; (b) contacting a sulfur-containing compound with the particulate material; (c) agitating the particulate material to entrain oxygen in the particulate material, wherein the particulate material is soil; and (d) adding a dispersing agent to the soil, wherein the dispersing agent is a detergent.
  • 60. A method according to claim 48 wherein the particulate material is impregnated with oxygen by adding an oxygen-containing compound to the particulate material.
  • 61. A method according to claim 48 wherein the metals in the particulate material that are to be stabilized are selected from the group consisting of mercury, arsenic, lead, zinc, barium, cadmium, chromium, selenium, silver and mixtures thereof.
  • 62. A method according to claim 48 wherein the particulate material has a mercury content of greater than about 260 ppm.
  • 63. A method according to claim 48 wherein the particulate material is soil and further comprising the additional step of adding a dispersing agent to the soil.
  • 64. A method according to claim 48 comprising the additional step of treating the metal reagent with an activator.
  • 65. A method according to claim 48, comprising the additional step of adding an iron-containing compound to the particulate material to react with excess sulfides in the particulate material.
  • 66. A method according to claim 48 wherein the sulfur-containing compound is a dimethylthiolcarbamate, diethylthiolcarbamate, sulfide, polysulfide or mixtures thereof.
  • 67. A method according to claim 48 wherein the metal reagent is selected from the group consisting of zinc, tin, copper, titanium, lead and mixtures thereof.
  • 68. A method according to claim 48 wherein the metal reagent is tin.
  • 69. A method according to claim 64 wherein the activator is a mineral containing acid.
  • 70. A method according to claim 64 wherein the activator is a sulfur-containing acid.
  • 71. A method according to claim 64 wherein the activator is selected from the group consisting of sulfamic acid, sulfamidic acid, sulfonic acid, sulfinic acid, sulfenic acid, and mixtures thereof.
  • 72. A method according to claim 64 wherein the activator is sulfamic acid.
  • 73. A method according to claim 48 wherein a pH level of the particulate material is in a range of approximately pH 4 to pH 8.
  • 74. A method according to claim 73 wherein the pH level of the particulate material is raised following the addition of the sulfur-containing compound.
  • 75. A method according to claim 65 wherein the pH level of the particulate material is approximately neutral following the addition of the iron-containing compound.
  • 76. A method according to claim 48 wherein approximately 0.4 to 2.0 weight percent of the metal reagent is added per kilogram of particulate material.
  • 77. A method according to claim 48 wherein the sulfur-containing compound is added in an amount ranging from about 1.0 mole to about 2.0 mole of sulfur-containing compound per mole of mercury for a metals concentration in the range of about 300 ppm of metals to about 1000 ppm of metals.
  • 78. A method according to claim 48 wherein the sulfur-containing compound is added in the an amount ranging from about 2.0 mole to about 3.0 mole of sulfur-containing compound per mole of mercury for a metals concentration in the range of about 1000 ppm of metals to about 3000 ppm of metals.
  • 79. A method according to claim 48 wherein the particulate material is selected from the group consisting of soil, sand, dirt, sludge, solid wastes and mixtures thereof.
  • 80. A method according to claim 65 wherein the iron-containing compound is selected from the group consisting of elemental iron, ferric chloride, ferric sulfate, ferrous sulfate and mixtures thereof.
  • 81. A method according to claim 63 wherein the dispersing agent is a surfactant.
  • 82. A method according to claim 63 wherein the dispersing agent is a detergent.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to and claims priority, under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/253,482, entitled “Method for Fixating Sludges and Soils Contaminated with Mercury and Other Heavy Metals”, filed Nov. 28, 2000, the entirety of which is incorporated herein.

STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST

This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. DE-FG03-97-ER82722 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (212)
Number Name Date Kind
1697095 Turner Jan 1929 A
2145901 Shoemaker Feb 1939 A
2367496 Greentree Jan 1945 A
2860952 Bergeron et al. Nov 1958 A
3194629 Dreibelbis et al. Jul 1965 A
3201149 Bragg Aug 1965 A
3232033 Williston et al. Feb 1966 A
3257776 Park et al. Jun 1966 A
3374608 Manes Mar 1968 A
3499837 Jaunarajs Mar 1970 A
3516947 Dudzik Jun 1970 A
3576947 Kruger May 1971 A
3674428 Dean et al. Jul 1972 A
3677696 Bryk et al. Jul 1972 A
3740331 Anderson et al. Jun 1973 A
3749761 Dean et al. Jul 1973 A
3755161 Yokota et al. Aug 1973 A
3790370 Lalancette Feb 1974 A
3835217 Dunsmoor Sep 1974 A
3847598 Coulter et al. Nov 1974 A
3857704 Coulter Dec 1974 A
3864327 Marchant Feb 1975 A
3873581 Fitzpatrick et al. Mar 1975 A
3876451 Zall Apr 1975 A
3890225 Kajiyama Jun 1975 A
3935098 Oda et al. Jan 1976 A
3947354 Swanson et al. Mar 1976 A
3948863 Akamatsu et al. Apr 1976 A
3961031 Yasui et al. Jun 1976 A
3969244 Kobayashi et al. Jul 1976 A
3984606 Morgan Oct 1976 A
3994719 Corte et al. Nov 1976 A
3999825 Cannon Dec 1976 A
4008937 Filippi Feb 1977 A
4038071 Di Bella Jul 1977 A
4051316 Wing et al. Sep 1977 A
4053401 Fukushima et al. Oct 1977 A
4069140 Wunderlich Jan 1978 A
4072605 Thelander Feb 1978 A
4083783 Wing et al. Apr 1978 A
4087359 Patron et al. May 1978 A
4094777 Sugier et al. Jun 1978 A
4101631 Ambrosini et al. Jul 1978 A
4108769 Krieg et al. Aug 1978 A
4118243 Sandesara Oct 1978 A
4133755 Tarao et al. Jan 1979 A
4147626 Findlay et al. Apr 1979 A
4151077 Nogueira et al. Apr 1979 A
4153556 Riedinger May 1979 A
4160730 Nguyen Jul 1979 A
4196173 deJong et al. Apr 1980 A
4230486 Capuano et al. Oct 1980 A
4233274 Allgulin Nov 1980 A
4238329 Zievers Dec 1980 A
4245989 Folkenroth et al. Jan 1981 A
4249786 Mahoff Feb 1981 A
4256227 Petrovich Mar 1981 A
4256707 Flynn, Jr. et al. Mar 1981 A
4260494 Dotson et al. Apr 1981 A
4273747 Rasmussen Jun 1981 A
4285564 Spinner Aug 1981 A
4340623 Justus Jul 1982 A
4354942 Kaczur et al. Oct 1982 A
4363749 Weiss et al. Dec 1982 A
4377483 Yamashita et al. Mar 1983 A
4385891 Ligotti May 1983 A
4419107 Roydhouse Dec 1983 A
4443417 Wiklund Apr 1984 A
4459370 van der Wal et al. Jul 1984 A
4474896 Chao Oct 1984 A
4500327 Nishino et al. Feb 1985 A
4564374 Hofmann Jan 1986 A
4583999 Lindahl et al. Apr 1986 A
4591437 Ernryd et al. May 1986 A
4599177 Hayashi et al. Jul 1986 A
4614592 Googin et al. Sep 1986 A
4654322 Holbein et al. Mar 1987 A
4670160 Moriya et al. Jun 1987 A
4693731 Tarakad et al. Sep 1987 A
4695447 Shultz Sep 1987 A
4709118 Yan Nov 1987 A
4721582 Nelson Jan 1988 A
4731187 Moriya et al. Mar 1988 A
4752398 Holbein et al. Jun 1988 A
4753632 Hofmann et al. Jun 1988 A
4764219 Yan Aug 1988 A
4764355 Romey et al. Aug 1988 A
4771030 Audeh Sep 1988 A
4786483 Audeh Nov 1988 A
4786484 Nelson Nov 1988 A
4814091 Napier et al. Mar 1989 A
4814152 Yan Mar 1989 A
4834953 Audeh May 1989 A
4843102 Horton Jun 1989 A
4844815 Ader et al. Jul 1989 A
4861493 Jansen Aug 1989 A
4877515 Audeh Oct 1989 A
4892567 Yan Jan 1990 A
4902662 Toulboat et al. Feb 1990 A
4909926 Yan Mar 1990 A
4909944 Jackson et al. Mar 1990 A
4911825 Roussel et al. Mar 1990 A
4915818 Yan Apr 1990 A
4917862 Kraw et al. Apr 1990 A
4919826 Alzner Apr 1990 A
4933158 Aritsuka et al. Jun 1990 A
4950408 Duisters et al. Aug 1990 A
4962276 Yan Oct 1990 A
4969995 Jackson et al. Nov 1990 A
4985389 Audeh Jan 1991 A
4986898 Torihata et al. Jan 1991 A
5017135 Meyer May 1991 A
5034054 Woodward Jul 1991 A
5053209 Yan Oct 1991 A
5062948 Kawazoe et al. Nov 1991 A
5064626 Johnson et al. Nov 1991 A
5080799 Yan Jan 1992 A
5085844 Nowack et al. Feb 1992 A
5107060 Yan Apr 1992 A
5114578 Sundstrom May 1992 A
5120515 Audeh et al. Jun 1992 A
5141724 Audeh et al. Aug 1992 A
5154833 Robinson Oct 1992 A
5173286 Audeh Dec 1992 A
5192163 Fleming Mar 1993 A
5202301 McNamara Apr 1993 A
5209773 Audhe et al. May 1993 A
5227053 Brym Jul 1993 A
5238488 Wilhelm Aug 1993 A
5245106 Cameron et al. Sep 1993 A
5248488 Yan Sep 1993 A
5294417 Moore et al. Mar 1994 A
5298168 Guess Mar 1994 A
5304693 Boitiaux et al. Apr 1994 A
5308500 Schwarzbach May 1994 A
5322628 Yan Jun 1994 A
5330658 Grant et al. Jul 1994 A
5336835 McNamara Aug 1994 A
5338444 van Buren et al. Aug 1994 A
5357002 Lezzi et al. Oct 1994 A
5360632 Johnson et al. Nov 1994 A
5369072 Benjamin et al. Nov 1994 A
5370827 Grant et al. Dec 1994 A
5391217 Zoche Feb 1995 A
5409522 Durham et al. Apr 1995 A
5419884 Weekman et al. May 1995 A
5421994 Sarrazin et al. Jun 1995 A
5437797 Helmig Aug 1995 A
5460643 Hasenpusch et al. Oct 1995 A
5463167 Ou Oct 1995 A
5492627 Hagen et al. Feb 1996 A
5505925 Fristad Apr 1996 A
5523067 Markovs Jun 1996 A
5536416 Coltrinari et al. Jul 1996 A
5569436 Lerner Oct 1996 A
5577910 Holland Nov 1996 A
5599515 Misra et al. Feb 1997 A
5607496 Brooks Mar 1997 A
5613851 Trawoger et al. Mar 1997 A
5658487 Carey et al. Aug 1997 A
5667695 Bedard et al. Sep 1997 A
5670122 Zamansky et al. Sep 1997 A
5679259 Bolser Oct 1997 A
5695726 Lerner Dec 1997 A
5741397 Kraver Apr 1998 A
5753125 Kreisler May 1998 A
5795159 Ralls et al. Aug 1998 A
5797742 Fraker Aug 1998 A
5846434 Seaman et al. Dec 1998 A
5880060 Blake et al. Mar 1999 A
5885076 Ralls et al. Mar 1999 A
5895832 Eccles Apr 1999 A
5898093 Vos Apr 1999 A
5900042 Mendelsohn et al. May 1999 A
5907037 Gujral et al. May 1999 A
5908559 Kreisler Jun 1999 A
5919001 Lin Jul 1999 A
5922277 Donhoff et al. Jul 1999 A
5967965 Vyshkina et al. Oct 1999 A
5976270 Zelez et al. Nov 1999 A
5976383 Guess et al. Nov 1999 A
5986161 Akae et al. Nov 1999 A
6022216 Cattani Feb 2000 A
6024239 Turner et al. Feb 2000 A
6039882 Wolfe et al. Mar 2000 A
6083306 Cattani Jul 2000 A
6083473 Esquivel et al. Jul 2000 A
6103205 Wojtowicz et al. Aug 2000 A
6132623 Nikolaidis et al. Oct 2000 A
6139485 Pal et al. Oct 2000 A
6139751 Bogaert et al. Oct 2000 A
6153108 Klock et al. Nov 2000 A
6165366 Sarangapani Dec 2000 A
6207073 Wolfe et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214304 Rosenthal et al. Apr 2001 B1
6254312 Chowdhury et al. Jul 2001 B1
6270679 Kreisler Aug 2001 B1
6274045 Kreisler Aug 2001 B1
6284208 Thomassen Sep 2001 B1
6294139 Vicard et al. Sep 2001 B1
6322613 Wojtowicz et al. Nov 2001 B1
6372187 Madden et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375909 Dangtran et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387276 Nikolaidis et al. May 2002 B1
6403044 Litz et al. Jun 2002 B1
6447740 Caldwell et al. Sep 2002 B1
6524371 El-Shoubary et al. Feb 2003 B2
6533842 Maes et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534024 Honjo et al. Mar 2003 B2
6558642 El-Shoubary et al. May 2003 B2
20010007647 Honjo et al. Jul 2001 A1
20030099585 Allgulin May 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
2173171 Oct 1996 CA
2173271 Feb 1999 CA
3813 264 Nov 1988 DE
3814684 Nov 1989 DE
41 23907 Jan 1993 DE
44 22 468 Jan 1996 DE
48026672 Apr 1973 JP
51069483 Jun 1976 JP
11147082 Jun 1999 JP
WO 02096559 May 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20020106317 A1 Aug 2002 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60253482 Nov 2000 US