Patent Grant
10022798
Applicant claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Austrian Application No. A 50042/2015 filed on Jan. 23, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to a method for forming a crowning on a sintered component made from a sintering powder, in particular on the teeth of a sintered component comprising a toothing, by calibrating the sintered component, for which reason the sintered component is inserted into a calibration tool which comprises a shaping chamber with at least one forming wall, wherein in the forming wall a crowning is formed which is inverse to the crowning of the sintered component to be formed and after calibration is removed again from the calibration tool.
A crowning on the teeth of components produced by power metallurgy is advantageous for the operating behavior of gears with a gear toothing, such as e.g. the contact pattern, NVH behavior, compensation of axis errors etc. The crowning can be formed by machining the toothing after sintering.
Rolling processes are also known from the prior art. Thus for example DE 32 19 674 A1 describes a method for forming a toothed rack-like tool for cold rolling a crowned toothing, according to which on a tool insert blank a toothing is formed with straight teeth, the tool insert blank being clamped during the production of the toothing and/or the tool insert provided with the toothing being curved during use such that on the finished tool, consisting of a tool support and the tool insert mounted thereon, a tooth shape of the toothing of the tooth insert is formed which is complementary to the tooth form of the crowned toothing.
Rolling processes for forming crownings are also known from DE 18 17 649 A1, DE 20 60 579 A1, AT 508 990 B1, WO 2008/116243 A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,517,772 B1.
Further methods and tools for producing crownings or for rolling gears are known from JP 2008-049384 A, DE 19 66 067 A1, DE 20 04 222 A1, DE 16 52 654 A1, FR 2 385 480 A1, GB 2 146 590 A, CH 564 999 A5, DE 29 48 106 A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,289,586 B1.
From the Austrian patent application of the Applicant with reference number A 50550/2013 a calibration tool is known for forming a crowning on a sintered component, in particular on the teeth of a sintered component comprising a toothing, comprising a calibration tool main body, in which a calibrating insert is mounted, wherein the calibrating insert comprises a recess for receiving the sintered component to be calibrated or for receiving a pressure pin. The calibrating insert can be adjusted in a direction perpendicular to the pressing direction, so that the diameter of the recess can be reduced or increased. In addition, an adjusting device is provided which acts on the calibrating insert to change the diameter of the recess. On an inner surface or an outer surface of the calibrating insert an depressed section or a raised section is formed for producing the crowning. Said patent application also describes a suitable method for forming a crowning on a sintered component by using said calibration tool.
The underlying objective of the present invention is to make it possible to form a toothing with teeth that have a crowning.
Said objective is achieved by the aforementioned method in which the size of the shaping chamber of the calibration tool is kept unchanged at least for the time period beginning with the insertion of the sintered component into the calibration tool and ending after the removal of the sintered molding from the calibration tool.
Surprisingly, it has been found that it is also possible to produce a crowning on a sintered component, in particular the teeth of a toothing of the sintered component, even if the calibrated sintered component is ejected from a calibrating mold after calibration, which does not make it possible to enlarge the latter for the ejection. The crowning therefore has to be forced on ejection by the provided cross-sectional tapering in the region of the axial opening of the calibration tool. It would be expected in this case that the crowning would become deformed and would disappear with the ejection of the sintered component. However, it has been established in tests that a certain degree of deformation may occur, but the crowning itself is retained to an extent which is sufficient for the sintered component from the point of view of its application. It is thus possible to simplify the formation of the crowning during the calibration of the sintered component, as no adjustments are necessary for decreasing or increasing the diameter of the forming chamber, as is the case in the aforementioned patent application of the Applicant with reference number A 50550/2013. In this way the processing time for a sintered component can also be reduced and thus the throughput increased per unit of time.
According to a preferred embodiment variant of the method a one-piece calibration tool made from rigid material is used. The calibration tool itself is thus easy to handle and is also designed to be more robust, so that greater shaping forces can be used during the calibration. By avoiding having a split calibration tool the formation of ridges on the sintered component can also be avoided more easily, whereby the method for forming the sintered components can also be shortened by reducing the individual process steps for the subsequent processing of the sintered component.
Preferably, it is also the case that the calibration for forming the crowning is performed directly after sintering the sintering powder. In particular, the sintered component is not surface compacted prior to the calibration. In this way it is possible for the calibration to be performed with less mechanical pressure on the sintered component, i.e. under “gentler” conditions. In addition, thus a reduction of the tolerances of the sintered component can also be achieved, as the plastic flow of material during calibration can be improved if the calibration is performed immediately after sintering the sintering powder.
According to another embodiment variant a calibration tool is used which comprises a cylindrical section connected directly to an insertion opening of the calibration tool for the sintered component. In this way it is possible to achieve a better crowning when ejecting the sintered component out of the calibration tool.
It is also possible for the calibrated surface of the sintered component to be surface compacted at least in some parts during the calibration and/or during the removal of the sintered component from the calibration tool, so that the sintered component has better mechanical characteristics even without subsequent surface compaction. By omitting the subsequent surface compaction the method for forming the sintered components can be shorted accordingly.
According to another embodiment variant of the method it is possible to use a calibration tool which has a shaping edge between the cylindrical section and the section with the crowning inverse to the crowning of the sintered component. In this way a sintered component can be produced which has a density gradient in the region of the surface in axial direction, whereby the contact pattern of a toothing in meshing engagement with another toothing can be improved.
A calibration tool can be used, the crowning, which is inverse to the crowning to be formed on the sintered component, being formed symmetrically in axial direction. In this way on the sintered component crownings can be formed which are asymmetrical in axial direction, whereby also the contact pattern of a toothing in meshing engagement with another toothing can be influenced.
However, it is also possible to use a calibration tool, the crowning, which is inverse to the crowning to be formed on the sintered component, being designed to be asymmetrical in axial direction. In this way the crowning of the sintered component in the calibration tool is also designed to be asymmetrical. This asymmetry can however be at least partly compensated for when ejecting the sintered component out of the calibration tool by a partial, plastic, permanent deformation, particularly if a shaping edge is formed in the calibration tool.
Preferably, in the latter embodiment variant of the method it is possible that a radius of curvature of the inverse crowning is greater in the direction of a first end face to a second end face of the calibration tool, whereby the formation of an at least almost symmetrical crowning on the sintered component is supported during the ejection of the calibrated sintered component.
For a better understanding of the invention the latter is explained in more detail with reference to the following Figures.
In a simplified, schematic representation:
First of all, it should be noted that in the variously described exemplary embodiments the same parts have been given the same reference numerals and the same component names, whereby the disclosures contained throughout the entire description can be applied to the same parts with the same reference numerals and same component names. Also details relating to position used in the description, such as e.g. top, bottom, side etc. relate to the currently described and represented figure and in case of a change in position should be adjusted to the new position.
The sintered component 2 is in particular a spur gear. Within the meaning of the invention a spur gear is defined both as a spur gear itself (for meshing engagement with the toothing of a further gear) and also as a toothed belt wheel or sprocket. It is also possible however to form other sintered components 2 with the calibration tool 1.
For the sake of completion it should be noted that a sintered component 1 or a powder-metallurgical component is usually produced according to the following method steps:
As said principle methods and variations thereof are known from the prior art, to avoid repetition reference is made to the relevant literature.
The calibration tool 1 is used in the method step “calibrating the component”. In this method step not only is the calibration itself performed, i.e. to increase the dimensional precision of the sintered component 2, but at the same time a crowning is formed on the teeth 3 of a toothing 4 of the sintered component 2.
In terms of the invention a crowning is defined in particular as a deviation from the linearity of the tooth flanks of the teeth of a gear wheel. This includes width crownings, as shown for example in
In particular, a crowning is produced by means of the calibration tool 1.
All three kinds of crowning can be produced jointly or individually or in a combination of two of the aforementioned types of crowning.
Furthermore, the calibration tool 2 is preferably used on straight toothings. However, oblique toothings can also be produced with a crowning of the tooth profile.
The crowning can be designed to be both symmetrical and asymmetrical. This means that, for example, in a crowning one side of the tooth flanks (as viewed in axial direction of the gear wheel) can be set back further (relative to the theoretic profile) than the other side.
The calibration tool 1 can be held in a corresponding, not shown pressing device, in a tool holder 5. Both the tool holder 5 and the pressing device are known from the prior art and reference is made to the latter for further details.
The calibration tool 1 has a recess 7 designed to be continuous in an axial direction 6. The recess 7 is used for insertion into the calibration tool 1 and for the removal of the sintered component 1 out of the calibration tool 1. The recess 7 is surrounded by at least one forming wall 8. As shown better in
Having at least one forming wall 8 means that the number of forming walls 8 is dependent on the form of the sintered component 2 to be calibrated.
The at least one forming wall 8 defines a forming chamber 9.
As already known the calibration of a sintered component is used for improving the dimensional precision of the sintered component, i.e. for example for correcting inaccuracies, such as e.g. warping, caused by the sintering. In this way tolerances can be reduced. Accordingly, the geometry of the forming chamber 9 and its dimensions generally correspond to the finished sintered component.
As by means of the calibration in the method that is the subject matter of this patent application, a crowning is formed on at least one surface of the sintered component 2, in the embodiment variant of the calibration tool 1 according to
The recess 10 is designed as a depression in this embodiment variant of the calibration tool 1. Thus by means of said calibration tool 1 a positive crowning is formed, in particular a positive crowning, on the tooth flanks of the sintered component 2.
For the production of gear wheels the recess 10 is designed to be axially symmetrical. However, if the sintered component 2 to be calibrated differs from the “circle geometry”, the basic outline of the recess 10 is adjusted accordingly in axial direction 11 to the basic outline of the sintered component 2, i.e. the contour in radial direction, in order to place the sintered component 2 fully over its circumference on the forming wall 8.
If a gear wheel is calibrated by the calibration tool 1 the inner surface of the calibration tool 1 also has a toothing.
For the production of the sintered component 1, as already explained above, from a sintering powder a semi-finished sintered component 1 is produced by sintering. In this state the sintered component 1 still does not have any crowning on at least one of its surfaces, i.e. in particular no crowning of the tooth flanks of the teeth 3 of a toothing of a gearwheel. The crowning is only formed during the calibration of the sintered component 1.
It should be mentioned in this connection that the cross section of a normal involute toothing in itself, which can occur after sintering, is not defined as a crowning within the meaning of the invention.
The calibration of the sintered component 1 is performed by means of an upper punch 11 and a lower punch 12. Both the upper punch 11 and the lower punch 12 are adjusted on their radial outer surfaces to the geometry of the at least one forming wall 8, and can thus for example also have an outer toothing which engages in the inner toothing of the calibration tool 1 during the calibration.
For calibrating the sintered, preferably not surface-compacted sintered component 2, the latter can be placed on the lower punch 12, for which reason the lower punch 12 can be moved in axial direction 6 upwards to the upper opening of the calibration tool 1. As soon as the toothing of the sintered component 2 coincides in its position with the inner toothing of the calibration tool 1, if the sintered component 2 comprises a toothing, the upper punch 11 is lowered downwards in the direction of the lower punch 12 until it lies on the sintered component 2. In this position then the lower punch 12 and the upper punch 11 are lowered downwards further so that the sintered component 2 enters the area of the recess 10 of the calibration tool. For the calibration afterwards the upper punch 11 can be lowered even further in the direction of the stationary lower punch. This causes a material flow, in that the recess 10 for forming the crowning of the calibration tool 1 is filled with the displaced material. In addition, also other inaccuracies of the sintered component are corrected, as already known. The sintered component 2 is thus applied fully onto the calibration tool 2 and reproduces the inner contour of the forming chamber 9.
As soon as said calibration step has been completed, the upper punch 11 is lifted again so that the latter is disengaged from the calibration tool. Afterwards the calibrated sintered component is ejected from the calibration tool 1 by lifting the lower punch 12. As the cross section of the forming chamber 9 becomes smaller towards the top, the sintered component 2 is partly deformed back plastically. Surprisingly, however the formed crowning, in particular width crowning, is retained, so that the finally calibrated, ejected sintered component 2 has the desired crowning permanently after ejection.
Thus by means of the invention a method is provided for forming a crowning on a sintered component 2 made from a sintering powder, in particular on the teeth of a sintered component 2 comprising a toothing, by calibrating the sintered component 2, for which reason the sintered component 2 is introduced into the calibration tool 1, which comprises the forming chamber 9 with at least one forming wall 8, wherein in the forming wall 8 a complementary crowning is formed which is inverse to the crowning of the sintered component 2 to be produced, and after the calibration is removed again from the calibration tool. The size of the forming chamber 9 of the calibration tool 1 remains unchanged at least for the time period beginning with the insertion of the sintered component 2 into the calibration tool and ending after the removal of the sintered molding 2 from the calibration tool 1. This means that the diameter or the cross-sectional shape is not changed at any point in the calibration tool 1 at least during said time period, i.e. is not increased or reduced, as is the case in the method according to the aforementioned patent application of the Applicant with reference number A 50550/2013. Preferably, the calibration tool is made from a solid material and is in particular designed in one piece, i.e. is not separable.
The possibility of the permanent plastic deformation of the crowning during the removal of the sintered component 2 from the calibration tool can if necessary be taken into account simply by a suitable configuration of the size of the forming chamber 9, so that the finally calibrated sintered component 2 always has the desired amount degree of crowning.
The demolding of the sintered component 2 can also be performed so that firstly the lower punch 12 is lowered and then the sintered component is ejected downwards 2 by the upper punch 11.
For centering the sintered component 2 a core pin 13 can be provided, as indicated by a dashed line in
The calibration tool 1 preferably consists of a one-piece, rigid, in particular metallic material, so that the method can be performed by using such a calibration tool 1. In particular the calibration tool 1 can be made from a steel.
It is also preferable, if the calibration for forming the crowning is performed immediately after sintering the sintering powder.
Although it is possible in principle that the recessed section in the at least one forming wall 8 of the calibration tool 1 is formed immediately adjoining an insertion opening 14 of the calibration tool 1 for the insertion of the sintered component 2, it is preferable if the calibration tool 1 at the insertion opening 14 immediately adjoining firstly at least one cylindrical section 15 has a constant diameter, to which the depression in the forming wall 8, i.e. the recess 10, connects for the formation of the crowning, as shown in
It is also possible, although not preferred, that the section 15 is designed to be conical.
Preferably, the calibration tool also comprises a second cylindrical section, which is formed at the bottom in the area of the dipping lower punch 12, as shown in
The negative crowning in the calibration tool 1, i.e. the recess 10 can be formed for example by deflection during erosion with a defined factor. The maximum depth of the recess 10 relative to the cylindrical inner surface of the calibration tool conforms to the desired geometry of the crowning to be formed on the sintered component 2. For example a radius of curvature 16 of the depressed section of the recess 10 designed with a curvature can be selected from a range of 10 mm to 15,000 mm.
As shown in
However, it is also possible, as shown in
It is also possible for the calibrated surface of the sintered component 2 to be surface compacted at least in some sections during the calibration and/or during the removal of the sintered component 2 from the calibration tool 1. For this the recess 7 (
In addition, it is also possible that a calibration tool 1 is used in the method which has a shaping edge 19. This can be formed for example, as shown in
However, it should be noted that the transition from the recess 10 to the cylindrical section 15 is provided with a curvature, as shown in
In general, the crowning, depending on the design of the calibration tool 1, can also be provided on the tooth head of a gear wheel or toothed sintered component 1.
It is also possible for the calibration of the sintered component 2 to be performed hot, whereby the formation of the crowning is simplified.
Although the above explanations relate to the outer surfaces of sintered components 2, in particular to the outer toothings of sintered components 2, it is possible to provide internal toothings or inner surfaces of sintered components 2 with such crownings. For this a core pin is used with a suitably shaped surface, i.e. with a surface comprising a crowning. Said core pin does not need to be fixed however, as with the aforementioned core pin 13. It is thus possible that said core pin can move up and down in axial direction 6.
The calibrated sintered component 2 formed according to the method and provided with a crowning is preferably not surface compacted after calibration. Also preferably no hard/fine processing of the calibrated surface is performed. However, various different heat treatments can be applied after calibration, as known in the field of producing sintered components 2.
The example embodiments show possible embodiment variants of the calibration tool 1, whereby it should be noted at this point that various different combinations of the individual embodiment variants are also possible.
Finally, as a point of formality, it should be noted that for a better understanding of the structure of the calibration tool 1 the latter or its components have not been represented true to scale in part and/or have been enlarged and/or reduced in size.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| A 50042/2015 | Jan 2015 | AT | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3584488 | Erdelyi | Jun 1971 | A |
| 4111031 | Vennemeyer et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4414729 | Ridley | Nov 1983 | A |
| 6168754 | Woolf et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6289586 | Casella et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6517772 | Woolf | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 8783080 | Koller et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 9144837 | Roessler et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9364886 | Bonnefoy | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 20050226759 | Trasorras et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 508 990 | Apr 2012 | AT |
| 514 778 | Mar 2015 | AT |
| 564 999 | Aug 1975 | CH |
| 18 17 649 | Jul 1970 | DE |
| 2 004 222 | Sep 1970 | DE |
| 1 652 654 | Apr 1971 | DE |
| 1 966 067 | Apr 1971 | DE |
| 2 060 579 | Jun 1972 | DE |
| 29 48 106 | Jun 1981 | DE |
| 32 19 674 | Dec 1982 | DE |
| 2 385 480 | Oct 1978 | FR |
| 2 146 590 | Apr 1985 | GB |
| 2008-049384 | Mar 2008 | JP |
| 2008116243 | Oct 2008 | NO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160214178 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
