The present invention relates generally to covers for industrial rolls, and more particularly to methods of forming covers for industrial rolls.
In a typical papermaking process, a water slurry, or suspension, of cellulosic fibers (known as the paper “stock”) is fed onto the top of the upper run of an endless belt of woven wire and/or synthetic material that travels between two or more rolls. The belt, often referred to as a “forming fabric,” provides a papermaking surface on the upper surface of its upper run which operates as a filter to separate the cellulosic fibers of the paper stock from the aqueous medium, thereby forming a wet paper web. The aqueous medium drains through mesh openings of the forming fabric, known as drainage holes, by gravity or vacuum located on the lower surface of the upper run (i.e., the “machine side”) of the fabric.
After leaving the forming section, the paper web is transferred to a press section of the paper machine, where it is passed through the nips of one or more presses (often roller presses) covered with another fabric, typically referred to as a “press felt.” Pressure from the presses removes additional moisture from the web; the moisture removal is often enhanced by the presence of a “batt” layer of the press felt. The paper is then transferred to a dryer section for further moisture removal. After drying, the paper is ready for secondary processing and packaging.
Cylindrical rolls are typically utilized in different sections of a papermaking machine. Such rolls reside and operate in demanding environments in which they can be exposed to high dynamic loads and temperatures and aggressive or corrosive chemical agents. As an example, in a typical paper mill, rolls are used not only for transporting the fibrous web sheet between processing stations, but also, in the case of press section and calender rolls, for processing the web sheet itself into paper.
Typically rolls used in papermaking are constructed with the location within the papermaking machine in mind, as rolls residing in different positions within the papermaking machines are required to perform different functions. Because papermaking rolls can have many different performance demands, and because replacing an entire metallic roll can be quite expensive, many papermaking rolls include a polymeric cover that surrounds the circumferential surface of a typically metallic core. By varying the material employed in the cover, the cover designer can provide the roll with different performance characteristics as the papermaking application demands. Also, repairing, regrinding or replacing a cover over a metallic roll can be considerably less expensive than the replacement of an entire metallic roll. Exemplary polymeric materials for covers include natural rubber, synthetic rubbers such as neoprene, styrene-butadiene (SBR), nitrile rubber, chlorosulfonated polyethylene (“CSPE”—also known under the trade name HYPALON® from DuPont), EDPM (the name given to an ethylene-propylene terpolymer formed of ethylene-propylene diene monomer), polyurethane, thermoset composites, and thermoplastic composites.
In many instances, the roll cover will include at least two distinct layers: a base layer that overlies the core and provides a bond thereto; and a topstock layer that overlies and bonds to the base layer and serves the outer surface of the roll (some rolls will also include an intermediate “tie-in” layer sandwiched by the base and top stock layers). The layers for these materials are typically selected to provide the cover with a prescribed set of physical properties for operation. These can include the requisite strength, elastic modulus, and resistance to elevated temperature, water and harsh chemicals to withstand the papermaking environment. In addition, covers are typically designed to have a predetermined surface hardness that is appropriate for the process they are to perform, and they typically require that the paper sheet “release” from the cover without damage to the paper sheet. Also, in order to be economical, the cover should be abrasion- and wear-resistant.
Many covers are formed in a rotational casting operation. In a typical rotational casting process (exemplified in
As the casting process commences, the nozzle 12 is positioned above one end of the core 10. The nozzle 12 is continuously supplied with molten polymer 14. As the fixture rotates the core 10 about its longitudinal axis, the nozzle 12 applies a strip 16 of polymeric material to the core 10. As the core 10 rotates, the nozzle 12 translates slowly along the longitudinal axis of the core 10. Typically, the rotational speed of the core 10 and the translation rate of the nozzle 12 are such that, as the core 10 rotates past a specific circumferential location, the nozzle 12 has moved longitudinally a distance that is less than the width of the polymeric strip 16 it is applying. Consequently, each portion of a strip 16 being applied overlies portions of the strips 16a that are applied immediately preceding its application and underlies portions of strips 16b that are applied immediately after its application (see
Although the process described above may be adequate for the formation of many covers, it does have at least one potential shortcoming for thick covers, or for thick layers of covers. The polymeric material applied to the core is molten, and is, therefore, somewhat malleable under load (even just the weight of subsequent overlapping layers of polymeric material) until it cures and hardens. The rate of curing for a strip of polymeric material is typically highly dependent on the thickness of the material. As such, when a relatively thick strip of polymeric material is applied to a core, its weight can cause the polymeric strips that were just applied (i.e., those that it partially overlies) to sag under the load. This tendency is exacerbated by the thickness of the underlying polymeric material, which can cause the underlying material to harden more slowly than a thinner strip would. As a result, there tends to be a practical thickness limit for the casting of some materials.
One approach to forming thicker covers is to maintain a viable thickness in the strips but to increase the extent of the overlap between adjacent layers. In this manner, the underlying layers can harden quickly, but the ultimate thickness of the entire cover or layer is greater. However, this approach results in a substantial increase in casting time.
The foregoing demonstrates that different approaches to the formation of covers for industrial rolls are still needed.
The present invention can provide, as a first aspect, a process for forming a cover for an industrial roll. The process includes the steps of: providing an elongate cylindrical core having a longitudinal axis; rotating the core about the longitudinal axis; providing a nozzle movable along a nozzle path that is substantially parallel to and above the core longitudinal axis, the nozzle having at least an upstream outlet and a downstream outlet, the nozzle outlets being longitudinally offset a distance from each other; and applying multiple strips of polymeric material to the core through the nozzle outlets as the nozzle moves along the nozzle path such that the downstream strip forms an overlapping spiral inner layer and the upstream strip forms an overlapping spiral outer layer that overlies the inner layer, the inner and outer layers being adhered with the core. This process can enable the production of a thicker layer on a roll cover than may be achievable with the application of a single layer of polymeric material.
As a second aspect, the present invention is directed to a process for forming a cover for an industrial roll, comprising the steps of: providing an elongate cylindrical core having a longitudinal axis; rotating the core about the longitudinal axis; applying a downstream strip of a polymeric material to the core such that the downstream strip forms an overlapping spiral inner layer; and then applying an upstream strip of the polymeric material over the inner layer such that the upstream strip forms an overlapping spiral outer layer that overlies the inner layer. The upstream strip is applied sufficiently proximate in time to the application of the downstream strip that the downstream strip is molten and bondable to the upstream strip, but sufficiently distant in time that the downstream strip has sufficiently cured to avoid substantial sagging, the inner and outer layers being adhered with the core. Like the process described earlier, this process can enable the production of a thicker layer on a roll cover than may be achievable with the application of a single layer of polymeric material.
As a third aspect, the present invention is directed to an industrial roll comprising: a metallic core; a polymeric base layer that is adhered to and overlies the core; and a top stock layer that overlies the base layer. The top stock layer comprises: a substantially cylindrical inner layer, the inner layer being formed of a spirally wound, overlapping strip of a first polymeric material; and a substantially cylindrical outer layer that circumferentially overlies the inner layer, the outer layer being formed of a spirally wound, overlapping strip of the first polymeric material. The top stock layer may be bonded directly to the base layer or to an intermediate tie-in layer that overlies the base layer.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. In the drawings, like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and thicknesses and dimensions of some components or features may be exaggerated for clarity.
Referring now to the figures, a casting system, designated broadly at 19, is illustrated in
Referring again to
The nozzle 22 includes two separate outlets for polymeric material: an upstream outlet 24 and a downstream outlet 26 that is longitudinally offset from the upstream outlet 24.
As used herein, the terms “upstream” and “downstream” refer to opposing directions that are parallel with the longitudinal axis A1 and the nozzle path N, with the “downstream” direction referring to the direction that the nozzle 22 moves while dispensing polymeric material and the “upstream” direction referring to the direction opposite the “downstream” direction. The upstream outlet 24 continuously dispenses an upstream strip 36 of polymeric material, and the downstream outlet 26 continuously dispenses a downstream strip 28 of polymeric material. The upstream and downstream strips 36, 28 take the cross-sectional form of, respectively, the upstream and downstream outlets 24, 26, which are typically substantially rectangular and/or oblong.
As can be seen in
In operation, as is illustrated in
The polymeric material being applied can be any known to those skilled in this art to be suitable for the production of roll covers; as examples, natural rubber; styrene-butadiene (SBR); nitrile rubber, chlorosulfonated polyethylene; EDPM; polyester; and polyurethane may be employed, with polyurethane being preferred. The polymeric material may contain additives and fillers that can modify or enhance its physical properties and manufacturing characteristics. Exemplary materials, additives and fillers are set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 6, 328,681 to Stephens, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety. The polymeric material should be applied at a temperature that enables the material to flow from the nozzle 22 onto the core 20 and to bond thereto.
In some embodiments, one or more of the translation rate of the nozzle 22, the rotational speed of the core 20, and/or the offset distance d between the outlets 24, 26 are selected such that, as the downstream strip 28 is applied, portions of the downstream strip 28 underlying the portion of the downstream strip 28 being applied are sufficiently hardened so as to resist substantial sagging. Also, one or more of these parameters may be selected so that, as the upstream strip 36 is being applied over the downstream strip 28, portions of the downstream strip 28 underlying the portion of the upstream strip 36 being applied are sufficiently hardened so as to resist substantial sagging. Thus, the inner and outer layers 34, 42 formed from the upstream and downstream strips 36, 28 can maintain their shape during casting, with the result that an increased total thickness of the inner and outer layers 34, 42 can be achieved compared to the thickness of a layer applied with a single nozzle in a single pass.
Those skilled in this art will recognize that, although the use of the multi-outlet nozzle 22 is preferred, embodiments of the invention may be performed with two separate nozzles.
If multiple nozzles are employed, the upstream and downstream strips they apply may be applied substantially simultaneously or not, but should be applied sufficiently proximate in time that the downstream strip is still molten and bondable to the upstream strip. It should also be apparent to those skilled in this art that more than two nozzles and/or nozzle outlets may be employed to apply more than two strips of polymeric material.
An additional embodiment of an industrial roll cover, designated broadly at 120, is illustrated in
Referring to
Referring still to
The foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting thereof. Although exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims. The invention is defined by the following claims, with equivalents of the claims to be included therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1384806 | Reed | Jul 1921 | A |
1993718 | Miner | Mar 1935 | A |
2597858 | Freedlander | May 1952 | A |
3184828 | Dames, Jr. | May 1965 | A |
3445906 | Mitchell | May 1969 | A |
3562883 | Kobayashi | Feb 1971 | A |
3646652 | Heiligenthal et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3800381 | Brafford | Apr 1974 | A |
3877919 | Shorr | Apr 1975 | A |
3962911 | Grenlund | Jun 1976 | A |
4016756 | Kunkle | Apr 1977 | A |
4064313 | Takiguchi et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4178664 | McLoughlin | Dec 1979 | A |
4233011 | Bolender et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4258089 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4288058 | Inman | Sep 1981 | A |
4309803 | Blaszak | Jan 1982 | A |
4366025 | Gordon, Jr. et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4368568 | Watanabe | Jan 1983 | A |
4509237 | Volz et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4551894 | Beucker | Nov 1985 | A |
4576845 | Krotchko | Mar 1986 | A |
4705711 | Perna | Nov 1987 | A |
4729153 | Pav et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4760232 | Smith | Jul 1988 | A |
4829931 | Mogi | May 1989 | A |
4842944 | Kuge et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4871908 | Skuratovsky et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4887340 | Kato et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4898012 | Jones et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4903597 | Hoage et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4910985 | Ballyns | Mar 1990 | A |
4938045 | Rosenstock et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4998333 | Skytta | Mar 1991 | A |
5014406 | Kato et al. | May 1991 | A |
5023985 | Salo et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5048353 | Justus et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5091027 | Watanabe | Feb 1992 | A |
5138766 | Kimura et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5167068 | Leino et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5217532 | Sasame et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5235747 | Leino et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5253027 | Goto | Oct 1993 | A |
5294909 | Frazier | Mar 1994 | A |
5301610 | McConnell | Apr 1994 | A |
5376448 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5379652 | Allonen | Jan 1995 | A |
5383371 | Laitinen | Jan 1995 | A |
5403995 | Kishino et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412870 | Lehtonen | May 1995 | A |
5415612 | Carlson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5435054 | Tonder et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5466343 | Kankaanpaa | Nov 1995 | A |
5505492 | Nelson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520600 | Fukumoto | May 1996 | A |
5553381 | Lehtonen | Sep 1996 | A |
5555932 | Dudley | Sep 1996 | A |
5562027 | Moore | Oct 1996 | A |
5601920 | Paasonen et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5684912 | Slaney et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5709765 | Herbert et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5742880 | Takenaka et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761801 | Gebhardt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5763068 | Kishino et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5780131 | Paasonen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797322 | Lorig et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5857950 | Hycner | Jan 1999 | A |
5860360 | Lane, III et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5915648 | Madrzak et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925220 | Hirsch et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6080258 | Tittgemeyer | Jun 2000 | A |
6159134 | Sekar | Dec 2000 | A |
6231711 | Roberts et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6257140 | Palmatier et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6284103 | Eng et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6375602 | Jones | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6409645 | Paasonen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6539999 | Polzin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6615721 | Vrotacoe et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
37 29 269 | Mar 1968 | DE |
4007141 | Apr 1991 | DE |
199 20 133 | Nov 2000 | DE |
0 970 797 | Jan 2000 | EP |
59 076212 | May 1984 | JP |
61-171913 | Aug 1986 | JP |
61-258794 | Nov 1986 | JP |
2-259186 | Oct 1990 | JP |
5-259186 | Apr 1993 | JP |
6-58324 | Mar 1994 | JP |
WO 9409208 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 9517298 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9631342 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9738162 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 0153787 | Jul 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040235630 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |