Method for forming surface-treating film

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20080038545
  • Publication Number
    20080038545
  • Date Filed
    August 08, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Published
    February 14, 2008
    17 years ago
Abstract
This invention relates to a method for forming on a metal substrate a surface treating film excelling in corrosion resistance and stability of film-forming agent, by applying a film-forming agent by a multistage electrification system comprising at least two stages.
Description
EXAMPLES

Hereinafter the present invention is explained still more specifically, referring to working Examples, in which “part” and “%” are “mass part” and “mass %”.


Production Example 1
Preparation of Carboxyl-Containing Polyester Resin

A reaction apparatus equipped with a heater, stirrer, nitrogen inlet tube and a separator was charged with 550 parts of hexahydrophthalic anhydride, 160 parts of adipic acid, 220 parts of trimethylolpropane, 170 parts of neopentyl glycol and 350 parts of 2-butyl-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol. Heating was started under dry nitrogen and the temperature was gradually raised to 230° C. to carry out an esterification reaction.


While maintaining the temperature of 230° C., the esterification was continued until the acid value dropped to not higher than 1 mgKOH/g. The esterification product was cooled to 170° C., to which 160 parts of trimellitic anhydride, and then 380 parts of ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, were added to provide a carboxyl-containing polyester resin solution having a solid content of 80%. The carboxyl-containing polyester resin had an acid value of 60 mgKOH/g, hydroxyl value of 90 mgKOH/g and number-average molecular weight of 1,500.


Production Example 2
Preparation of Carboxyl-Containing Acrylic Resin

A flask equipped with a stirrer, thermometer, nitrogen inlet tube and a reflux condenser was charged with 290 parts of propylene glycol monomethyl ether and kept at 120° C. Into the flask a mixture of the following components was dropped over 3 hours, and then 3 parts of azobisdimethylvaleronitrile was added, to be reacted at a constant temperature of 120° C. for another hour. Thus a carboxyl-containing acrylic resin solution having a solid resin content of 65% was obtained. The carboxyl-containing acrylic resin had an acid value of 78 mgKOH/g, hydroxyl value of 145 mgKOH/g and weight-average molecular weight of 16,000.
















Mixture
Parts



















styrene
60



n-butyl acrylate
300



2-hydroxyethyl acrylate
180



acrylic acid
60



azobisdiisobutyronitile
36










Production Example 3
Preparation of Carboxyl-Containing Epoxy Resin

A flask equipped with a stirrer, thermometer, nitrogen inlet tube and a reflux condenser was charged with 500 parts of jER828EL (tradename, Japan Epoxy Resin Co., an epoxy resin having an epoxy equivalent of 190 and molecular weight of 350) and to which 200 parts of bisphenol A and 0.1 part of dimethylbenzylamine were added, followed by their reaction at 130° C. until the epoxy equivalent increased to 750. Then 135 parts of dimethylolbutyric acid was added, and the reaction was continued at 130° C. for further 4 hours. Successively adding 77 parts of trimellitic anhydride and then 228 parts of ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, a carboxyl-containing epoxy resin solution having a solid content of 80% was obtained. This carboxyl-containing epoxy resin had an acid value of 78 mgKOH/g, hydroxyl value of 140 mgKOH/g and number-average molecular weight of about 1800.


Production Example 4
Preparation of Hardener No. 1

To 222 parts of isophorone diisocyanate, 44 parts of methyl isobutyl ketone was added, and the temperature was raised to 70° C. Thereafter 174 parts of methyl ethyl ketoxime was dropped into the reaction system over 2 hours. While maintaining this temperature, the system was sampled with time until absence of unreacted isocyanate was confirmed by infrared absorption spectroanalysis. Thus hardener No. 1 of blocked polyisocyanate compound having a solid content of 90% was obtained.


Production Example 5
Preparation of Emulsion No. 1

To 87.5 parts (solid content, 70 parts) of the carboxyl-containing polyester resin having a solid content of 80% as obtained in the above Production Example 1, 33.3 parts (solid content, 30 parts) of the hardener No. 1, 3 parts (for neutralization of 0.4 equivalent) of triethylamine and 188.7 parts of deionized water were added to form an aqueous dispersion, from which emulsion No. 1 having a solid content of 32% was obtained.


Production Examples 6-8
Preparation of Emulsions No. 2-No. 4

Emulsion Nos. 2-4 each having the blended composition as shown in Table 1 were prepared by the operations similar to Production Example 5.














TABLE 1







Production
Production
Production
Production



Example 5
Example 6
Example 7
Example 8




















Emulsion
No. 1
No. 2
No. 3
No. 4












Base resin
carboxyl-containing
87.5 (70)


87.5 (70)



polyester resin solution



solid content 80%



carboxyl-containing acrylic

107.7 (70) 



resin solution



solid content 65%



carboxyl-containing epoxy


87.5 (70)



resin solution



solid content 80%


Hardener
hardener No. 1
33.3 (30)
33.3 (30)
33.3 (30)
16.7 (15)



solid content 90%



NIKALAC MX-430 (note



  15 (15)



3)


Neutral-
triethylamine
3
3
3
3


izer











Deionized water
188.7
168.5
188.7
190.3


32% emulsion
312.5 (100)
312.5 (100)
312.5 (100)
312.5 (100)





The numerals show blended amount and the parenthesized numerals show solid content.


(note 3) NIKALAC MX-430: tradename, Sanwa Chemical Co., a melamine resin, solid content: 100%.






Production Example 9
Preparation of Acrylic Resin Solution for Dispersing Pigment

A conventional acrylic resin reaction tank equipped with a stirrer, thermometer and reflux condenser was charged with 37 parts of ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, which was heated under stirring and maintained at 110° C.


Into the reaction tank a mixture of the following components was dropped over a period of 3 hours, followed by 30 minutes aging at 110° C. Then an additional mixed catalyst solution formed of 20 parts of ethylene glycol monobutyl ether and 0.5 part of azobisisobutyronitrile was dropped over an hour, followed by an hour's aging at 110° C. Cooling the reaction product, an acrylic resin solution for dispersing pigment, having a solid content of 55% was obtained.
















Mixture
Part(s)



















styrene
10



methyl methacrylate
35



2-ethylhexyl methacrylate
20



2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
10



NF BISOMER S20W(note 4)
40



azobisisobutyronitrile
1



isobutyl alcohol
5








(note 4)NF BISOMER S20W: tradename, Dai-ichi Kogyo Seiyaku Co., Ltd. a 50% aqueous dilution of methoxypolyethylene glycol monomethacrylate, molelcular weight: about 2,080.







Production Example 10
Preparation of Pigment-Dispersed Paste No. 1

The acrylic resin solution for dispersing pigment, having a solid content of 55% as obtained in Production Example 9, 6.3 parts (solid content: 5 parts); JR-600E(note 5), 14 parts; CARBON MA-7(note 6), 0.3 part; HYDRITE PXN(note 7), 9.7 parts; dioctyltin oxide, 1 part; and deionized water, 23.2 parts were dispersed in a ball mill for 20 hours, to provide a pigment-dispersed paste No. 1 having a solid content of 55%.


Production Example 11
Preparation of Pigment-Dispersed Paste No. 2

Pigment-dispersed paste No. 2 was prepared by the operations similar to Production Example 10, except that the components as identified in the following Table 2 were used.












TABLE 2







Production
Production



Example 10
Example 11


















Pigment-dispersed paste
No. 1
No. 2










Dispersing
acrylic resin solution for
6.3 (5.0)
6.3 (5.0)


resin
dispersing pigment



solid content 55%



ammonium fluorozirconate

1.3 (1.3)



ammonium fluorotitanate

2.1 (2.1)


Coloring
JR-600E (Note 5)
14.0 (14)  
14.0 (14)  


pigment
CARBON MA-7 (Note 6)
0.3 (0.3)
0.3 (0.3)


Extender
HYDRITE PXN (Note 7)
9.7 (9.7)
9.7 (9.7)


Tin catalyst
Dioctyltin oxide
1.0 (1.0)
1.0 (1.0)









Deionized water
23.2
25.8


55% Pigment-dispersed paste
54.5 (30)  
60.5 (33.3)





Parenthesized numerals show solid content.


(Note 5)


JR-600E: tradename, Tayca Corporation, titanium white


(Note 6)


CARBON MA-7: tradename, Mitsubishi Chemical Co., carbon black


(Note 7)


HYDRIDE PXN: tradename, Georgia Kaolin Co., kaolin






Production Example 12

Emulsion No. 1, 219 parts (solid content: 70 parts), 55% pigment-dispersed paste No. 1 as obtained in Production Example 10, 54.5 parts (solid content: 30 parts) and deionized water, 726.5 parts were mixed to form a bath having a solid content of 10%, and to which 1.3 parts of ammonium fluorozirconate was added to provide film-forming agent No. 1.


Production Examples 13-26

Film-forming agent Nos. 2-15 were prepared in the manner similar to Example 13, except that the blends as shown in the following Tables 3 and 4 were used.



















TABLE 3







Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production



Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example



12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

























Film-forming agent
No. 1
No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
No. 5
No. 6
No. 7
No. 8
No. 9

















Bath
Emulsion No. 1
 219.0



 219.0
 219.0
 219.0
 219.0
 219.0




 (70)



 (70)
 (70)
 (70)
 (70)
 (70)



Emulsion No. 2

 219.0





 (70)



Emulsion No. 3


 219.0






 (70)



Emulsion No. 4



 219.0
 219.0
 219.0
 219.0
 219.0
 219.0







 (70)
 (70)
 (70)
 (70)
 (70)
 (70)



Pigment-dispersed paste
 54.5
 54.5
 54.5
 54.5
 54.5
 54.5
 54.5
 54.5
 54.5



No. 1
 (30)
 (30)
 (30)
 (30)
 (30)
 (30)
 (30)
 (30)
 (30)



Deionized water
 726.5
 726.5
 726.5
 726.5
 726.5
 726.5
 726.5
 726.5
 726.5



10% Bath
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000




(100)
(100)
(100)
(100)
(100)
(100)
(100)
(100)
(100)


Zr
ammonium fluorozirconate
  1.3
  1.3
  1.3
  1.3
  1.3
  1.3
  1.3
  1.3
  1.3




 (1.3)
 (1.3)
 (1.3)
 (1.3)
 (1.3)
 (1.3)
 (1.3)
 (1.3)
 (1.3)


Metal (a)-
ammonium fluorotitanate




  2.1


containing





 (2.1)


compound
cobalt nitrate hexahydrate





  2.5









 (2.5)



ammonium metavanadate






  1.2



pentahydrate






 (1.2)



ammonium tungstate







  0.7



pentahydrate







 (0.7)



praseodymium nitrate








  1.5



hexahydrate








 (1.5)





Parenthesized numerals show solid content.




















TABLE 4







Production
Production
Production
Production
Production
Production



Example 21
Example 22
Example 23
Example 24
Example 25
Example 26






















Film-forming agent
No. 10
No. 11
No. 12
No. 13
No. 14
No. 15














Bath
Emulsion No. 1









Emulsion No. 2



Emulsion No. 3



Emulsion No. 4
 219.0 (70)
 219.0 (70)
 219.0 (70)
 219.0 (70)
 219.0 (70)
 219.0 (70)



Pigment-dispersed paste No. 1
 54.5 (30)
 54.5 (30)
 54.5 (30)
 54.5 (30)

 54.5 (30)



Pigment-dispersed paste No. 2




 60.5 (33.3)



Deionized water
726.5
726.5
726.5
726.5
753.5
726.5



10% bath
1000.0 (100)
1000.0 (100)
1000.0 (100)
1000.0 (100)
1033.0 (103.3)
1000.0 (100)


Zr
ammonium fluorozirconate
  1.3 (1.3)
  1.3 (1.3)
  1.3 (1.3)
  1.3 (1.3)


Metal (a)-
magnesium nitrate hexahydrate
  5.3 (5.3)


containing
lanthanum nitrate hexahydrate

  1.6 (1.6)


compound
aluminum nitrate nonahydrate


  6.9 (6.9)



zinc nitrate nonahydrate



  2.3 (2.3)





Parenthesized numerals show solid content.






Example 1

A bath of film-forming agent No. 1 was adjusted to 28° C., and into which cold-rolled sheet steel (70 mm×150 mm×0.8 mm) which was the object to be coated and served as the cathode was immersed (interpolar distance: 15 cm). The first stage coating was carried out by applying electricity at 5 V for 60 seconds.


Continuously then the second stage coating was carried out by applying electricity at 260 V for 120 seconds, letting the cold rolled sheet steel (70 mm×150 mm×0.8 mm) as the anode (interpolar distance: 15 cm). Thus formed film was baked at 170° C. for 20 minutes with an electric dryer to provide a test panel No. 1.


The current density in the first stage electrification was 0.2 mA/cm2.


Examples 2-14

Test panel Nos. 2-14 were prepared in the manner similar to Example 1, except that the film-forming agent and electrification conditions as shown in Tables 5 and 6 were used.



















TABLE 5







Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-



ple 1
ple 2
ple 3
ple 4
ple 5
ple 6
ple 7
ple 8
ple 9

























Test panel
No. 1
No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
No. 5
No. 6
No. 7
No. 8
No. 9


Film-forming agent
No. 1
No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
No. 5
No. 6
No. 7
No. 8
No. 9

















The first stage
Voltage (V)
5
5
5
5
10
15
15
30
30


The coating object
sec.
60
60
60
60
50
30
30
30
30


was cathode
Current density (mA/cm2) (note 8)
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.6
1.0
1.0


The second stage
Voltage (V)
260
270
270
270
200
200
160
160
200


The coating object
sec.
120
120
120
120
100
100
90
90
90


was anode

















Film
Film condition (note 9)



























structure
film
Total amount of Zr and metal (a)
99
98
99
98
98
99
98
99
90



(X)
(%) (note 10)




Film thickness (μm)
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2



film
Total amount of Zr and metal (a)
10.5
8.8
5.5
10.4
4.6
5.7
10.2
16.3
7.2



(Y)
(%) (note 10)




Resin component (B) content (%)
80
70
75
80
90
85
80
80
90




(note 11)




Film thickness (μm)
18.8
18.9
18.8
18.0
17.6
17.5
17.0
18.0
17.5
















Corrosion resistance (note 12)











Exposure resistance (note 13)











Finished appearance (note 14)











Weatherability (note 15)











Stability of film-forming agent (note 16)































TABLE 6







Example
Example
Example
Example
Example



10
11
12
13
14





















Test panel
No. 10
No. 11
No. 12
No. 13
No. 14


Film-forming agent
No. 10
No. 11
No. 12
No. 13
No. 14













The first
Voltage (V)
7
7
7
7
7


stage
sec.
80
90
90
90
90


The coating
Current density (mA/cm2)
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


object was
(note 8)


cathode


The second
Voltage (V)
170
250
200
210
170


stage
sec.
100
90
90
90
90


The coating


object was


anode.













Film
Film condition







structure
(note 9)















film
Total amount of Zr
98
98
98
98
97



(X)
and metal (a) (%)




(note 10)




film thickness (μm)
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2



film
Total amount of Zr
14.3
11.3
20.2
12.3
14.1



(Y)
and metal (a) (%)




(note 10)




Resin component
75
80
75
85
80




(B) content (%)




(note 11)




film thickness (μm)
17.7
17.6
17.5
15.5
18.2












Corrosion resistance (note 12)







Exposure resistance (note 13)







Finished appearance (note 14)







Weatherability (note 15)







Stability of film-forming agent (note 16)














Comparative Examples 1-14

Test panel Nos. 15-28 were prepared in the manner similar to Example 1, except that the film-forming agent and electrification conditions as shown in Tables 7 and 8 were used.




















TABLE 7







Com-
Com-
Com-
Com-
Com-
Com-
Com-
Com-
Com-
Com-



para-
para-
para-
para-
para-
para-
para-
para-
para-
para-



tive
tive
tive
tive
tive
tive
tive
tive
tive
tive



Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-
Exam-



ple 1
ple 2
ple 3
ple 4
ple 5
ple 6
ple 7
ple 8
ple 9
ple 10


























Test panel
No. 15
No. 16
No. 17
No. 18
No. 19
No. 20
No. 21
No. 22
No. 23
No. 24


Film-forming agent
No. 1
No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
No. 5
No. 6
No. 7
No. 8
No. 9
No. 10


















The first
Voltage (V)




70
110
110
110
0.9
110


stage
sec.




130
70
150
90
180
180


The coating
Current density (mA/cm2)




0.8
1.3
1.3
1.3
0.05
2.4


object was


cathode


The second
Voltage (V)
260
260
260
260
220
170
250
180
160
160


stage
sec.
180
180
180
180
50
110
30
150
90
90


The coating


object was


anode


















Film
Film condition
X
X
X
X
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
X
X


structure
(note 9)




















film
Total amount of Zr and




99
99
99
99





(X)
metal (a) (%)




(note 10)




film thickness (μm)




0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6





film
Total amount of Zr and




35.2
28.3
26.4
28.9





(Y)
metal (a) (%)




(note 10)




Resin component (B)




45
60
65
55






content (%)




(note 11)




film thickness (μm)




13.2
14.0
16.5
15.5



















Corrosion resistance (note 12)
X
X
X
X
Δ
Δ
Δ
X
Δ
Δ


Exposure resistance (note 13)
X
X
X
X
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ
Δ


Finished appearance (note 14)









Δ


Weatherability (note 15)
Δ

Δ
Δ




Δ
Δ


Stability of film-forming agent (note 16)































TABLE 8







Comparative
Comparative
Comparative
Comparative



Example
Example
Example
Example



11
12
13
14




















Test panel
No. 25
No. 26
No. 27
No. 28


Film-forming agent
No. 12
No. 13
No. 14
No. 15












The first
Voltage (V)
130
140
150
10


stage
sec.
90
80
60
60


The coating
Current density (mA/cm2)
0.8
1.2
0.7
0.1


object was
(note 8)


cathode


The second
Voltage (V)
180
200
210
280


stage
sec.
150
130
120
120


The coating


object was


anode












Film
Film condition (note 9)
Δ
Δ
Δ
X













structure
film
Total amount of Zr and
99
99
99




(X)
metal (a) (%) (note 10)




film thickness (μm)
0.4
0.4
0.3




film
Total amount of Zr and
38.5
30.1
32.1




(Y)
metal (a) (%) (note 10)




Resin component (B)
55
60
60





content (%) (note 11)




film thickness (μm)
15.5
14.5
15.0












Corrosion resistance (note 12)
X
X
X
X


Exposure resistance (note 13)
Δ
X
X
X


Finished appearance (note 14)






Weatherability (note 15)



Δ


Stability of film-forming agent (note 16)









(note 8) Current density: The cold-rolled sheet steel (70 mm × 150 mm × 0.8 mm) which was the coating object was immersed in film-forming agent as the cathode (interpolar distance: 15 cm) and the current density at the time of applying the voltage in the first stage was measured.


(note 0) Film condition: Each test panel was cut and the coating conditions of the film (X) and film (Y) were observed with HF-2000 (tradename, Hitachi Seisakujo, a field emission transmission electron microscope). Evaluation of the coating condition was given according to the following standard: ◯: layer distinction was clearly recognizable; Δ: the borderline between the film (X) and the other film (Y) was not clear but layer distinction was more or less recognizable. X: no layer distinction possible.


(note 10) Total amount of Zr and metal (a) (%): The amount of total metal (mass %) in film (X) was measured with IX-3100 RF (tradename, K. K. Rigaku, a fluorescent X-ray spectroanalyzer).


(note 11) Resin component (B) content: Film (Y) before hardening by baking was scraped off, from which the resin content was calculated according to the following equation (2): Mass of the film (Y) which was dried at 105° C. for 3 hours b1 Residual mass of the film after 5 hours' baking in a crucible at 800° C. b2 Content (%) of resin component (B) = [(b1 − b2)/b1] × 100 equation (2).


(note 12) Corrosion resistance: Coating film on each test panel was cross-cut with a knife to the depth reaching the substrate surface, and the test panel was given a saline solution spray resistance test for 480 hours following JIS Z-2371. Corrosion resistance was evaluated by the following standard according to width of rust and blister development from the knife cuts: ⊚: the maximum width of rusting and blistering from the cuts was less than 2 mm (single side); ◯: the maximum width of rusting and blistering from the cuts was no less than 2 mm but less than 3 mm (single side); Δ: the maximum width of rusting and blistering from the cuts was no less than 3 mm but less than 4 mm (single side); X: the maximum width of rusting and blistering from the cuts was 4 mm or more (single side).


(note 13) Exposure resistance: The test panels were applied with WP-300 (tradename, Kansai Paint Co., a water-borne intermediate paint) by spray-coating method, to a hardened film thickness of 25 μm, and baked at 140° C. × 30 minutes in an electric hot air dryer. Further onto the intermediate coating film NEO AMILAC 6000 (tradename, Kansai Paint Co., a top paint) was applied by spray coating method, to a hardened film thickness of 35 μm, which was subsequently baked at 140° C. × 30 minutes in an electric hot air dryer, to provide panels for exposure test. The coating films on the exposure test panels were cross-cut with a knife to the depth reaching the substrate, and the panels were exposed to the open air in horizontal position for a year in Chikura-cho, Chiba Prefecture, Japan. The exposure resistance was evaluated according to the rusting and blistering width from the knife cuts, by the following standard: ⊚: the maximum width of rusting and blistering from the cuts was less than 2 mm (single side), ◯: the maximum width of rusting and blistering from the cuts was no less than 2 mm but less than 3 mm (single side), Δ: the maximum width of rusting and blistering from the cuts was no less than 3 mm but less than 4 mm (single side), and X: the maximum width of rusting and blistering from the cuts was no less than 4 mm (single side)


(note 14) Finished appearance: Surface roughness value (Ra) of the coated plane of each test panel was measured with SURF TEST 301 (tradename, MITSUTOYO Co., a surface roughness tester) at a cutoff of 0.8 mm and the evaluation was given according to the following standard: ◯: the surface roughness value (Ra) was less than 0.2 μm, Δ: the surface roughness value (Ra) was no less than 0.2 μm but less than 0.3 μm, X: the surface roughness value (Ra) was no less than 0


(note 15) Weatherability: The test panels each coated with a coating film of 20 μm in dry thickness were subjected to the accelerated weatherability test as prescribed by JIS K-5600-7-7, and the time at which the 60° specular reflectivity (%) dropped below 80% was measured. ⊚: the time by which the 60° specular reflectivity (%) dropped below 80% was not less than 200 hours; ◯: the time by which the 60° specular reflectivity (%) dropped below 80% was not less than 150 hours but less than 200 hours; Δ: the time by which the 60° specular reflectivity (%) dropped below 80% was not less than 50 hours but less than 150 hours; X: the time by which the 60° specular reflectivity (%) dropped below 80% was less than 50 hours.


(note 16) Stability of film-forming agent: Each of the film-forming agents was stirred in a sealed container at 30° C. for 30 days. Thereafter each the total amount of the film-forming agent was filtered through a 400 mesh-filtration net. The amount of the residue (mg/L) was measured: ⊚: less than 5 mg/L, ◯: no less than 5 mg/L but less than 10 mg/L, Δ: no less than 10 mg/L but less than 15 mg/L, X: no less than 15 mg/L.





Claims
  • 1. A method for forming a surface-treating film, which comprises applying a film-forming agent onto a metal substrate by a multistage electricity-applying system comprising at least two stages, wherein (i) the film-forming agent comprises 30-20,000 ppm, in terms of the total amount of metals (as converted to mass), of zirconium compound and, optionally, a compound containing at least one metal (a) which is selected from titanium, cobalt, vanadium, tungsten, molybdenum, copper, zinc, indium, aluminum, bismuth, yttrium, lanthanide metals, alkali metals and alkaline earth metals, and 1-40% by mass of an anionic group-containing resin component,(ii) the first stage coating is conducted, in the state that the metal substrate is immersed in the film-forming agent, by applying electricity at a voltage of 1-50 V for 10-360 seconds, using the metal substrate as the cathode, and(iii) the second and subsequent stage coating is conducted, in the state that the metal substrate is immersed in the film-forming agent, by applying electricity at a voltage of 50-400 V for 60-600 seconds, using the metal substrate as the anode.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1, in which the first stage coating is conducted at a current density of 0.05-1.5 mA/cm2.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1, in which the film-forming agent contains 50-10,000 ppm, in terms of the total amount of metal (as converted to mass), of zirconium compound and metal (a) containing compound.
  • 4. A method according to claim 1, in which the film-forming agent contains 5-35 mass % of the resin component.
  • 5. A method according to claim 1, in which the first stage coating is conducted by applying electricity at a voltage of 2-40 V for 30-300 seconds, using the metal substrate as the cathode, and the second and subsequent stage coating are conducted, by applying electricity at a voltage of 75-370 V for 75-400 seconds.
  • 6. A method according to claim 1, in which the anionic group-containing resin component comprises anionic resin and crosslinking agent.
  • 7. A method according to claim 6, in which the anionic resin is selected from carboxyl-containing polyester resin, carboxyl-containing acrylic resin and carboxyl-containing epoxy resin.
  • 8. A method according to claim 6, in which the crosslinking agent is selected from blocked polyisocyanate compound and melamine resin.
  • 9. A film structure formed by the method according to claim 1, which comprises a 0.01-5 μm-thick film (X) containing, based on the total solid content by mass of the film, 25-100 mass % of the zirconium compound and the metal (a)-containing compound in terms of the total amount of the metals (as converted to mass); and 0.1-30 μm-thick film (Y) on the film (X), containing, based on the total solid content by mass of the film, less than 25 mass % of the zirconium compound and the metal (a)-containing compound in terms of the total amount of the metals (as converted to mass) and 50-95 mass % of the anionic group-containing resin component.
  • 10. Coated articles having a surface-treating film which is formed by the method according to claim 1.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2006-215644 Aug 2006 JP national