Patent Grant
10269094
The application is a U.S. National Phase Application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/034477, filed Apr. 17, 2014, which claims the benefit of the earlier filing date of co-pending German Patent Application No. 102013103971.5, filed Apr. 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a method for generating a composite image of an object composed of multiple sub-images, wherein multiple adjacent sub-images of the object are captured; and said sub-images are combined together by means of an image processing operation to form a coherent composite image.
When biological samples are analyzed, these samples are exposed to a suitable light and are photographed by means of a camera. By suitably marking with biological markers, the biological samples can be examined by, for example, a fluorescent analysis or with colorimetric techniques. Additional examinations can be performed with simple reflected light or transmitted light techniques. For accurate optical scanning of the sample, microscope optical systems are used in order to identify even small biological structures.
If large samples or so-called micro-arrays with a plurality of objects, probes or biochips are examined, there is the problem that a large area has to be photographed with a high resolution. In order to solve this problem, it is known to scan large areas. In so doing, the area is photographed line by line; and the lines are combined to form a composite image. Such a method is known from the U.S. Pat. No. 7,978,874B1.
Compared with such methods, image detectors offer the advantage of a larger optical variability. However, in order to create a composite image, multiple sub-images that are captured by the image detector have to be merged together to form a composite image. In the case of such an image processing operation, also called stitching, the overlapping regions of the sub-images are examined as to whether they match up. For example, an optical object is found in both of the adjacent sub-images, and the position of the sub-images in relation to each other is determined by means of the position of said optical object in the sub-images, so that the sub-images can be stitched together in the correct position. This technique is known, for example, from U.S. Pat. No. 7,778,485B1.
Such a blending together of sub-images to form a composite image can result in inaccuracies if there is inadequate information in the overlapping region of two sub-images, so the position of the sub-images in relation to each other can be determined only inadequately.
In order to solve this problem, it is known, for example, from the WO98/44446 to move a sample substrate with such a high mechanical precision that the adjacent and non-overlapping sub-images of the object can be stitched together with an accuracy of a few μm without image processing. However, this method requires a motion device with which the sample can be moved under the objective lens with high precision.
The object of the present invention is to provide a simple and reliable method for generating a composite image from multiple adjacent sub-images.
This object is achieved by means of a method of the genre described in the introductory part of the specification, where the stitching of the sub-images together to form a composite image in the image processing operation is performed using an optical pattern that is generated by means of a pattern means. The pattern provides adequate optical information, so that the position of the sub-images in relation to each other can be reliably determined by means of the properties of the pattern, such as its location in the sub-images.
In this case it is advantageous if the sub-images at least partially overlap each other, so that the pattern is imaged in the overlapping region of both sub-images or in the pattern images that overlap each other when the pattern is not directly imaged in the sub-image. However, an overlapping of the sub-images is not absolutely necessary because the optical pattern can also be configured in such a way that immediately adjacent sub-images can be fixed in their position to each other by means of the pattern.
The sub-images depict a part of the object. The composite image depicts a larger part of the object or the whole object and is expediently composed of at least two sub-images, in particular, of at least a one-dimensional chain of K sub-images, where K≥3; and, furthermore, in particular, is composed of a two-dimensional arrangement of N×M sub-images, where N≥2 and M≥2. The sub-images can abut each other or overlap each other. The sub-images are at least one-dimensional images with k pixels, where k≥2, expediently two-dimensional images with a two-dimensional pixel arrangement, expediently an arrangement of n×m pixels, where n≥2 and m≥2. Correspondingly an image detector of an image capturing device for capturing sub-images comprises at least k adjacent detector elements that are arranged, in particular, at least n×m in a two-dimensional grid.
An algorithm in the image processing operation expediently uses the optical pattern to stitch together the sub-images. The image processing method can include one or more of the following steps:
At least two images that at least partially contain the optical pattern are examined for pattern elements of the pattern. Optionally the pattern elements can be recognized as such by means of a pattern recognition device. The pattern elements that are found in the two images are compared with each other for agreement. The agreement can be examined in the form of parameters: size and/or color. If the agreement in one or more parameters exceeds a predefined degree, then the two pattern elements are assigned to each other. Complementary pattern elements are examined for their location in relation to each other. The location can comprise the position and the orientation in the images. The location of the pattern elements can be used to relate the two images in their position to each other. The two images are blended by means of this relationship together to form the composite image. In the composite image two complementary pattern elements are congruently superposed one on top of the other.
The pattern means is arranged expediently outside the object. The pattern means generates an additional pattern for imaging the object. Therefore, the pattern is not a pattern that is inherent in the object. The pattern means is expediently independent of the object. As an alternative, the pattern means may be a component of the object, for example, a pattern means that is mounted on a sample carrier. Even pattern elements, such as particles, in a sample element, for example an adhesive, are possible and advantageous. In general, it is advantageous, if the pattern means is arranged in a region or is imaged as a pattern in a region that is free of the object to be examined or free of a region of the object that is to be examined so the pattern does not disturb the contour of the object.
The optical pattern can consist of one or more pattern elements. The pattern can be a predefined pattern that is generated in such a way that its geometry is defined by the pattern means, for example, dots and/or lines. However, it is also possible to generate the pattern in such a way that it is undefined, so that it is not predetermined. The image processing unit comprises one or more algorithms for the pattern recognition; this algorithm expediently recognizes the pattern as such in the sub-image or in the pattern image.
The optical pattern can be imaged totally or partially in the sub-images, expediently in an overlapping region of two adjacent sub-images. However, it is generally not necessary that the pattern be arranged—if desired, only partially—in the overlapping region. If the pattern or a portion of it is arranged in a sub-image, one property of the pattern can be registered from one edge of the pattern (for example, a brightness profile).
If the optical pattern is imaged totally or partially in the sub-images, then the image processing unit can recognize the optical pattern—or more specifically a pattern element directly from the sub-images—and can stitch the sub-images together in the correct position. However, the imaging of the optical pattern in the sub-images has the drawback that the optical pattern hides the image contents of the sub-images and, as a result, can reduce the image content of the sub-images. In order to eliminate this problem, it is advantageous to image the optical pattern in one or more pattern images that expediently have a defined relative location in relation to the sub-images. It is advantageous if the pattern images are different from the sub-images in such a way that the optical pattern is imaged only in the pattern images, and the sub-images don't have a pattern.
It is advantageous if each sub-image is assigned a pattern image. In this case different sub-images are assigned different pattern images. The image processing unit determines the position of the sub-images in relation to each other by means of the location of one pattern element in two images, i.e. two sub-images or two pattern images. The position of the sub-images in relation to each other can also be determined indirectly by means of the location of the pattern images in relation to each other.
In order to capture the sub-images, the object is moved expediently in relation to an image capturing device, such as a camera or an objective lens. As a result, the image capturing device can scan the object sub-image by sub-image. Advantageously the pattern is moved along with the object. Thus, the pattern moves in the same way relative to the image capturing device as the object itself. At the same time it is advantageous if the pattern, in its movement, is coupled completely to the movement of the object, so that no relative movement between the pattern and the object takes place. Since the movement is only a relative movement, it is also possible to hold the object and the pattern in a state of rest and to move the image capturing device. Advantageously the pattern means is moved along with the object holder and the object. In particular, the pattern means is moved automatically with said object holder. In this case an automatic movement can be generated by means of a rigid connection between the pattern means and the object holder.
One advantageous embodiment of the invention provides that the object holder is a sample stage; and the object is a sample, in particular a biological sample, that is arranged on the sample stage. A biological sample includes a biological material, in particular, cells, micro-organisms, bacteria and/or the like. The sample is expediently a two-dimensional, flat sample, which can exhibit one or more sample elements, for example, microchips, an arrangement of multiple sample vessels and/or the like. Advantageously the sample comprises a sample substance that is placed on or in the sample holder. The sample can be covered by a cover, expediently a cover glass. Advantageously the sample holder and, in particular, also the cover are transparent in the wavelength of the object image. A suitable material for the sample holder is glass.
An additional advantageous embodiment of the invention provides that the method is a microscopy method; and that the sub-images are captured by means of the optical system of a microscope. The optical system of the microscope expediently has a magnification of at least a factor of 5 and, in particular, a magnification of at least a factor of 20.
In order to image the optical pattern on an image detector, there are a number of possibilities that depend on multiple parameters. These parameters are described in detail below and can be combined in any way.
The first parameter is the execution of the pattern as a material pattern or a non-material pattern. Hence, the parameter has two possibilities. The pattern can be a material pattern, for example, an item, such as a glass scale, which is securely connected to the object holder, and/or an item, which is securely connected to the object, for example, a sample. Some examples may include particles in the sample, for example, in an adhesive, or a coating of an element of the object. In contrast, a non-material pattern, for example, a radiation pattern, which can be executed in the form of an imaging, is particularly advantageous. The pattern is thrown by, for example, the pattern means, as a radiation pattern onto a pattern carrier, for example, the object. The term radiation pattern also includes a shadow pattern. A projection of a material pattern onto the pattern carrier is advantageous. Expediently the pattern means is configured in such a way that the optical pattern can be switched off; that is, the optical pattern can be switched on and off.
A second parameter is the wavelength, or more specifically the radiation spectrum, in which the pattern is captured on an image detector. The term wavelength is used below not only for a sharp wavelength, but also for a spectrum of wavelengths. Images of the pattern or a portion of it can be captured in the wavelength of the object image or in a wavelength of the pattern image. Hence, these parameters also have two possibilities: that is, a dual parameter. The wavelength of the object image is a wavelength or rather an optical spectrum, in which the sub-images are captured and in which an object image detector that captures the images is sensitive. The wavelength of the image can be in the visible spectral range, can be a fluorescent wavelength or any other suitable spectral range.
A wavelength of the pattern image is different from the wavelength of the object image. Said wavelength of the pattern image lies outside the wavelength of the object image, or more specifically outside the wavelength spectrum of the object image. Said wavelength of the pattern image is such a wavelength, or rather spectral range, in which the sub-images are not captured, and, thus, to which the object image detector is insensitive or which is filtered out of the optical path of the object image. In the course of capturing sub-images, the wavelength of the pattern is, for example, filtered out of the optical path so that the sub-images are not captured in this wavelength. In an additional possibility the wavelength of the pattern is invisible to the object image detector. Hence, said object image detector is insensitive in this wavelength.
An additional parameter constitutes the excitation wavelength and the emission wavelength of the pattern. Typically the emission wavelength of the pattern is included in the excitation wavelength spectrum of the pattern. The pattern is generated, for example, with blue light, emits with blue light, and is captured in the blue spectral range. However, there is also the possibility of configuring the pattern in such a way that its emission wavelength is not included in the excitation wavelength spectrum, for example, in the case of fluorescence. In this case a highly energetic radiation is incident on a pattern carrier, which emits the pattern with low energetic radiation, in which the pattern is then captured. Hence, this parameter is also a dual parameter, and it therefore has two possibilities.
An additional dual parameter has the two possibilities that the pattern is already incident on a pattern carrier as a pattern, for example, the object, or said pattern is first formed by the pattern carrier; that is, the pattern is inherent in the pattern carrier. In this case the pattern carrier is, for example, uniformly exposed; and said pattern carrier generates the pattern in its emission, for example, in that only one pattern region scatters, reflects or fluoresces.
Another dual parameter consists of whether the pattern is imaged in the sub-image, thus in the imaging of the object, which is used for generating the composite image, or whether the pattern is imaged in a pattern image, which is in addition to the object image. In this case the pattern is not imaged in the sub-image, so that the object information in the sub-image is maintained to the maximum extent.
When pattern images are captured, it is advantageous if the pattern images are arranged in a predefined position in relation to the sub-images. The position of the pattern images in relation to each other can be determined by means of an evaluation of the pattern in the pattern images. The position of the sub-images in relation to each other can be determined by means of the known position of the object images in relation to the pattern images, so that these sub-images can be stitched together to form the composite image.
The pattern image can comprise an imaging of the object. However, it is not used as a sub-image. For example, the object is imaged together with the pattern on an object image detector; and a pattern image is captured. The position of the pattern image, particularly in relation to a predefined reference point, is determined by means of the pattern. The sub-image is captured beforehand or afterwards without the pattern, so that there is the possibility of removing the pattern from the imaging and then capturing the sub-image or first capturing the sub-image and then making the pattern visible in the imaging on the detector. Expediently the object holder is held in the same position, for example, relative to the reference point, in both images.
An additional parameter is the place of a non-material pattern. The pattern becomes visible at a pattern carrier. This pattern carrier can be the object or an item that is different from the object, for example, at the object holder or at a different item.
Furthermore, it is advantageous if the pattern is made visible on a pattern carrier that is transparent to a wavelength of the object image. The pattern carrier can be transilluminated in the object image wavelength in which the sub-images were captured, whereas the pattern can be emitted by the pattern carrier. In this case the pattern carrier is expediently opaque to a wavelength of the pattern image. The pattern carrier can be a glass, for example, a sample carrier and/or a cover glass for covering a sample. An adhesive that glues multiple elements together is also possible. The pattern carrier water is similarly possible and advantageous, for example, as a component of the object, while other components of the object can also be used as the pattern carrier at the same time. Glass can be used as such as the pattern carrier or can comprise a stain that is transparent to the wavelength of the object image and is opaque to the wavelength of the pattern image.
Another advantageous embodiment of the invention provides that the pattern is a laser pattern. A predefined pattern is especially easy to generate with a laser. The laser pattern is made visible in an advantageous way on a pattern carrier that is expediently not the object or a part of it. The laser can radiate, just like the laser pattern, in the wavelength of the object image or in a separate wavelength of the pattern image. Similarly it is possible that the laser pattern is excited by the laser and radiates back in a wavelength that is different from the laser.
Furthermore, it is advantageous if the pattern is an interference pattern. This interference pattern can be generated in a pattern carrier, which can be, for example, a cover glass of a sample, and which is transparent to the wavelength of the object image. In this case the interference pattern can be imaged as such on an object image detector or a pattern image detector.
The pattern can be generated, with the same advantage, as a standing wave, in particular in a sample element, i.e. an element associated with the sample: for example, the sample holder or a part of it, such as a sample cover glass.
The generation of the pattern as a speckle pattern is similarly possible and advantageous. This speckle pattern is also generated advantageously in a sample element.
An additional dual parameter is the chronological sequence of the capturing of the sub-images and the pattern images. The capturing can occur simultaneously or in succession. During image capturing in succession, a sub-image can be generated first, and then beforehand or afterwards the pattern image, assigned to the sub-image, can be generated. The sub-image and the pattern image can be imaged on the same object image detector, or the sub-image is imaged on the object image detector, and the pattern image is imaged on a pattern image detector.
Another dual parameter consists of imaging the pattern on either an object image detector or a pattern image detector, which is separate from the object image detector. In the event that two detectors are used, these detectors can be sensitive in the same wavelength of the object image or in different spectral ranges: for example, the object image detector in the wavelength of the object image and the pattern image detector in the wavelength of the pattern image.
An additional parameter is the choice of the objective lens that captures the pattern. The pattern can be imaged with an object objective lens on a detector, and this object objective lens also images the object on the object image detector. Another possibility consists of imaging the pattern with a pattern objective lens, which is expediently present in addition to the object objective lens, and by means of which the object is not imaged. The parameters of both detectors and the two objective lenses can be combined with each other in any way. Thus, an optical path can be guided from two objective lenses to one detector, or from one objective lens to two detectors, or from two objective lenses to two detectors, or from one objective lens, which images the object and the pattern, to a single detector.
An additional parameter consists of the relative position of the pattern in relation to the object. The pattern can be made visible on or in the object, expediently in the plane of the object image. Another possibility consists of arranging the pattern in the object image, but before or after the plane of the object image. To this end, it is advantageous if the pattern is arranged outside the object plane of the sub-images; i.e. outside the plane on which the optical system focuses on the object image detector for sharp imaging of the object. In this case the optical system can focus initially on the pattern and then on the object or vice versa. The images, i.e. the sub-images and the pattern images, can be captured as a function of the focusing. A third possibility for the parameters consists of arranging the pattern next to the object and outside the object image.
Another parameter can include whether the radiation that generates the optical pattern is incident on the object, or whether the pattern goes through the object. If the radiation is incident on the object, then the radiation can be incident on the object by means of the objective lens of the object. That is, the radiation can be coupled into an image optical path of the object image. As an alternative or in addition, the radiation can be transmitted from externally past the objective lens of the object onto the object. If the pattern radiates in the transmitted light technique, then said pattern is passed through the object or the object holder.
The choice of a suitable pattern means offers an additional parameter. The pattern means can be a transmission element, i.e. such an element that is illuminated by a light source and allows only a portion of the radiation to pass as the light pattern or shadow pattern. Another embodiment uses a self-radiating pattern, for example, an LED, which already forms a pattern by means of its non-uniform emission, so that in one advantageous embodiment of the invention the pattern can be an imaging of a pattern light source.
The aforementioned parameters can be combined in any way so that an advantageous generation of the pattern is achieved for the respective application. Individual advantageous exemplary embodiments are described in conjunction with the figures. However, due to the plethora of possible and advantageous embodiments corresponding to the combination of the aforementioned parameters, it is not possible to describe all of the advantageous embodiments. Correspondingly only a small selection of advantageous embodiments can be presented. However, other combinations of the parameters may be advantageous in other applications.
In addition, the invention relates to a device for generating a composite image composed of multiple sub-images. The device comprises an object image detector, an optical system for imaging an object on the object image detector, and an image processing unit for stitching multiple adjacent and, in particular, partially overlapping sub-images of the object together to form a coherent composite image.
It is proposed that the device exhibits a pattern means for generating an optical pattern according to the invention. In this case the image processing unit is preconfigured to stitch the sub-images together to form the composite image by means of the pattern. As described above, the relative position of the sub-images in relation to each other can be recognized by means of the pattern, and the sub-images can be stitched together in the correct position to form the composite image.
The device comprises advantageously one or more of the above described device elements, such as detectors, objective lenses, sample elements, pattern carriers and the like.
Furthermore, the device advantageously comprises a control unit that is preconfigured to carry out the method according to the invention and one or more of the above described details of the method.
The optical system expediently comprises an object optical system, which is transmissive in a wavelength of the object image, and which can also comprise an object objective lens. Furthermore, the optical system comprises advantageously a pattern optical system, which is transmissive in a wavelength of the pattern image and which can also comprises a pattern objective lens. Expediently, an object optical system is less than 50% transparent in a wavelength of the pattern image, in particular less than 10%.
The above description of advantageous embodiments of the invention includes numerous parameters of the invention that are described in detail. However, the person skilled in the art will combine these features in a practical way to form logical combinations. In particular, these features can be combined individually and in any suitable combination with the inventive method and the inventive device, according to the independent claims.
The above described properties, features and advantages of the invention as well as the manner in which said properties, features and advantages are achieved, will become clearer and will be better understood in conjunction with the following description of the exemplary embodiments that are explained in detail with reference to the drawings. The purpose of the exemplary embodiments is to explain the invention and not to limit the invention to the combination of features that are disclosed in said exemplary embodiments, not even with respect to the functional features. In addition, the respective suitable features of any one of the exemplary embodiment may also be viewed explicitly in isolation, may be removed from one exemplary embodiment, inserted into another exemplary embodiment in order to complement it, and/or can be combined with any one of the claims.
In order to capture the object images or more specifically the sub-images 6 of the object 8, as they are called here, the device 2 comprises an image capturing device 13, for example in the form of a camera, which can comprise an object image detector 18 or any other suitable unit for capturing the sub-images 6. A spectral filter 22 is arranged upstream of the object image detector 18 in the optical path 20 of the object image. This spectral filter can have one or more different filter elements, so that the sub-images 6 can be captured in different wavelengths of the object image.
Further upstream in the optical path 20 there is an optical imaging system 24, which is a part of the optical system 26, which comprises not only the optical imaging system 24, but also the objective lens 14. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
Furthermore, the device 2 comprises an image capturing device 35 with an image processing unit 36 for processing the pattern 30, imaged on the pattern image detector 34, by means of image processing steps. An additional image processing unit 38 is used for processing the object images or more specifically the sub-images 6 and for evaluating the sub-images 6 or more specifically the composite image 4 with respect to the optical properties of the object 8. The two image processing units 36, 38 can also be configured as a single image processing unit 36, which takes over the functions of the two depicted image processing units 36, 38.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
Furthermore, the device 2 comprises a pattern means 44 having a light source 46, a pattern element 48 and a pattern optical system 50. The pattern element 48 is, for example, a pattern shutter, in which the pattern 30 is arranged, as transparent apertures, in a shutter that is otherwise opaque for the light of the light source 46. As an alternative, the light source and the pattern element 48 are a single element, which emits light in a pattern. As an example, it is possible to use an LED having spatial emission characteristics that are not homogeneous. A corresponding pattern is imaged on the pattern carrier by means of the pattern optical system 50.
The term “light” is not limited in the following to the visible spectrum, but rather can also include electromagnetic radiation of any suitable wavelength or more specifically of any suitable spectrum. The pattern means 44 is securely connected to the object holder 10 by way of a pattern means holder 52 so that the pattern means is always in the same position in relation to the object 8.
The object 8 from
A sample 60 to be observed occupies only a portion of the area of the object 8, not only because in the example there are multiple object elements, each with one sample 60. The samples occupy only a sub-region of the object elements, so that there is an interesting region to be observed, and there are other regions that can be used, as required, for patterns without covering the sample 60.
The object 8 lies on the object holder 10 and is securely connected to said object holder, so that when the object holder 10 moves in relation to the object 14, the object 8 moves along exactly the sample 8 of this relative movement [sic]. The motion unit 56 is controlled by a movement means 64, which may be a part of a central evaluation means 66, which can also comprise the image processing units 36, 38.
A number of advantageous methods for generating a composite image 4 are described below by means of multiple examples.
The object 8 is securely connected to the object holder 10 and is moved into the field of view of the objective lens 14. If desired, there may also be a focusing step, so that the objective lens 14 focuses the object 8 in a focal plane of the object; that is, the object focal plane that is imaged on the object image detector 18 lies in a desired position inside the object 8. The object 8 can be illuminated with reflected light or transmitted light; and a sub-image 6 of the object 8 can be imaged on the object image detector 18 and captured.
In addition to the illumination of the object, the object 8 is illuminated by means of the pattern means 44. This approach allows the pattern 30, for example, a dot pattern indicated in
Each sub-image 6 is an object image of the object 8 and shows the corresponding section of the object 8. A pattern image 68 shows the pattern 30 on the object 8. Object elements can also be visible in the pattern image 68; however, this is not necessary. The pattern 68 is emitted by a pattern carrier, which can be the object 8 or can be arranged above, below or next to the object 8.
The position of the pattern images 68 is expediently selected in such a way that one pattern image 68 covers a sub-image 6 exactly. Hence, the images 6, 68 are identical in shape and position on the object 8. Correspondingly the overlapping regions 70, 72 are also congruently superposed one on top of the other. In each case one sub-image 6 and one pattern image 68 correspond to each other and are assigned to each other. If the position of two pattern images 68 in relation to each other is known, then the position of the corresponding sub-images 6 in relation to each other is also known.
However, the sub-images 6 and the pattern images 68 are captured in different wavelengths. Hence, the object 8 is illuminated in a wavelength of the object image and emits in this wavelength, so that the sub-images are captured by the object image detector 18 in this wavelength of the object image. In contrast, the pattern carrier is illuminated in a pattern image wavelength, which is different from the object image wavelength, and the pattern 30 is emitted from the pattern carrier in the wavelength of the pattern image. In this exemplary embodiment the illumination wavelength of the light source 46, i.e. the excitation wavelength of the pattern 30, is also its emission wavelength, i.e. the pattern image wavelength, in which the pattern images 68 are captured.
The wavelength of the pattern image is selected in such a way that the pattern image 68 does not reach the object image detector 18 and/or said object image detector is insensitive to the wavelength of the pattern image. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
After capturing a sub-image 6 and—before, after, or at the same time—capturing a pattern image 68, the object 8 is moved in relation to the objective lens 14 by means of the motion unit 56, so that an additional section of the object 8 comes to rest in the field of view of the objective lens 14. At this point another sub-image 6 with the associated pattern image 68 is captured, so that now there are two sub-images 6, each with its associated pattern image 68.
The evaluation means 66 calculates by means of image processing methods the relative position of both pattern images 68 in relation to each other from the pattern elements imaged in the two pattern images 68. For this purpose the evaluation means compares the pattern 30 in the overlapping region 70 of the two pattern images 68 for identical pattern elements. If the pattern image 68 reveals a region that is identical to a region in another pattern image 68, then the two regions can be brought to congruence, and in doing so the two pattern images 68 can be positioned relative to each other. Since at this point the position of the pattern images 68 in relation to each other is known, the sub-images 6 can also be positioned in relation to each other. The sub-images 6 are in a pre-known position and orientation to the pattern images 68, so that when the position of the pattern images 68 in relation to each other is known, the sub-images 6 can also be properly stitched together. At this point the sub-images 6 can be combined to form the composite image 4. In so doing, all of the sub-images 6 with the associated pattern images 68 of the composite image 4 can be captured in a first step, and then the composite image 4 is only created after all of the images have been captured. It is also possible to merge the sub-images 6 one after the other by means of the pattern images 68 and, as a result, to create the composite image 4 in succession.
The wavelength of the pattern image is chosen, corresponding to the object 8, in a suitable spectral range. The spectral range should be one in which the pattern 30 becomes visible on the object 8 or on a suitable pattern carrier that is arranged on said object. In the exemplary embodiment depicted herein, the object 8 comprises a cover glass 62, which is opaque to ultraviolet light. In this case opaque is understood to mean a degree of transparency of less than 50%, in particular, less than 10%. To show the pattern 30, the object 8 or the object holder 10 has a pattern carrier, on which the pattern 30 becomes visible. The wavelength of the pattern is selected in such a way that the incident pattern 30 can become visible on the pattern carrier.
In the exemplary embodiment depicted in
The cover glass 62 can have a stain that is invisible in the sub-images 6.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, the pattern 30 can be generated initially by the pattern carrier. Then the pattern 30 is intrinsic in the pattern carrier. In the specific case this can be carried out in such a way that the pattern carrier—for example, the cover glass 62—is uniformly illuminated with light in the wavelength of the pattern. At this point the pattern element 48 is no longer present in the pattern illumination, but rather in a different form in the pattern carrier, for example, as an embossed structure. As a result, the pattern carrier can exhibit a stain that is invisible in the sub-images 6. As an alternative, the pattern carrier has, for example, a fluorescent pattern that fluoresces in the form of the pattern when a large area is illuminated. In this case the corresponding fluorescent wavelength, i.e. the emission wavelength of the pattern 30, is a wavelength other than the incident wavelength for exciting the fluorescence. However, it is also possible to conceive of other pattern elements in which the incident wavelength is identical to the emission wavelength—for example, by means of a reflection pattern or by means of different transparencies of the pattern carrier—so that some portions of the pattern carrier are transparent and others are opaque to the wavelength of the pattern.
If the goal is to economize by eliminating the additional detector 34, then the wavelength of the pattern has to be selected in such a way that the pattern 30 can be recognized by the object image detector 18. Then it is also possible to dispense with the decoupling element 54. The illumination of the pattern means 44 can be switched on and the pattern image can be captured by the object image detector 18. Then the illumination, which generates the pattern 30, can be switched off, and the object 8 is captured in the form of a sub-image 6. Between the capturing of the pattern image and the sub-image 6, the object 8 is held rigidly in a state of rest in relation to the objective lens 14. The object 8 is moved relative to the objective lens 14 only after the pattern image and the sub-image 6 have been captured.
Similarly it is possible that the pattern carrier, for example, the cover glass 62, has a stain, which is visible to the object image detector 18 only during illumination with the light source 46. When the light source 46 is switched on, the pattern image 68 is captured, and when switching off the light source 46, in which the stain does not appear in the sub-image 6, the sub-image 6 is captured. The pattern can be generated with a pattern element 48 or the pattern is intrinsic in the pattern carrier, for example, through a suitable distribution of the stain in the pattern carrier.
Rather than switching the pattern illumination on and off, the spectral filter 22 can be selected in such a way that the pattern 30 is visible or is not visible in the object image detector 18, according to the position of the spectral filter 22. For example, in order to capture the pattern image, the spectral filter 22 can be different from the filter that is used for capturing the sub-image 6. Or the spectral filter 22 is used only for capturing the sub-image 6, so that the pattern 30 is filtered out by the spectral filter 22.
The arrangement of the pattern 30 in relation to the object 8 can also be selected in a different way. In the exemplary embodiment from
An additional possibility for generating a pattern is shown in
The pattern is switched on by switching the individual regions of the pattern means 68 to opaque mode, transparent mode or self-illuminating mode. Therefore, the object holder 10 is, for example, transparent to the wavelength of the object image. For this wavelength of the object image the individual regions of the pattern means 68 can be switched to opaque mode so that the pattern becomes visible during transmitted light illumination. The pattern is switched off by switching the regions of the wavelength of the object image to transparent mode, so that the pattern is invisible for the object image detector 18. In this way the pattern image and the sub-image 6 can be captured one after the other, so that the image data loss in the object image or more specifically the sub-image 6 can be minimized. It is possible to dispense with the image capturing device 35. The pattern means 74 is simultaneously the pattern carrier. The pattern means 74 is expediently mounted securely on or in the object holder 10 and is always moved along with this object holder.
The pattern can also be transmitted as a transmitted light pattern from below into the object 8. For example, the pattern means 44 from
Another possibility for generating a pattern is shown in
As an alternative, it is possible to select an interference pattern, which is formed in or on the pattern carrier 80. Similarly, as an alternative, it is possible to integrate inhomogeneity in the pattern carrier 80. This inhomogeneity has the effect of decoupling the laser light in the direction of the objective lens 14, so that the pattern becomes visible as the decoupling pattern. The inhomogeneities should be selected in such a way that they are as invisible as possible from the top and without laser illumination so that the object image is not disturbed.
Furthermore, it is possible to generate a speckle pattern in a pattern carrier. The pattern carrier can be the cover glass 62, and the speckle pattern is generated with a laser in the cover glass 62. This pattern is easy to generate and is very fine, so that it is possible to determine precisely the position of the pattern images 68 in relation to each other.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
As an alternative, it is possible to have a totally separate pattern camera in addition to the object camera. In this case both cameras are rigidly coupled to each other. In order to couple the two cameras, one of the two cameras, expediently the object camera, comprises a coupling preparation device 90, with which the other camera can be coupled. If stitching is desired, then the pattern camera can be coupled to the object camera; and the stitching can be performed by means of the pattern images of the pattern camera. If stitching is not necessary, then the pattern camera can be decoupled and removed.
Independently of the type of pattern generation and the pattern 30, the sub-images 6 can be captured one after the other. At this point there is the possibility of not combining the sub-images 6 of a composite image 4 together to form a composite image until after all of the sub-images 6 of the composite image 4 have been captured. This approach has the advantage that a sub-image can be merged with the respective adjacent sub-image 6 not only at one edge, but also at several of its edges, so that merging errors can be eliminated or minimized through position redundancy.
However, it is preferred that the sub-images 6 be merged one after the other, in particular in the sequence in which they were captured. Preferably the merging is performed in real time. Hence, before all of the sub-images 6 of the composite image 4 are captured, in particular, even before the next subsequent sub-image 6 is captured, a sub-image 6 is merged with an adjacent sub-image 6, in particular, with the sub-image that was captured immediately before.
This arrangement makes it possible to achieve the advantage that the regions of the composite image 4 composed of multiple sub-images 6 can be looked at without delay; one does not have to wait until the composite image 4 is created. The merging is performed by means of an imaging processing operation, for example, for each of two sub-images 6 that have been captured directly one after the other. As a result, the composite image 4 is stitched together piece by piece in the sequence, in which the sub-images 6 were captured. In this respect the already merged region of the composite image 4 is outputted on a display unit, for example, a screen.
In the event that a merging error is made while merging two sub-images 6, there is the risk that this error will propagate into the placement of the subsequent sub-images 6. In order to avoid such an error, a sub-image 6 can be stitched at all of its edges, which abut the adjacent sub-images 6 or overlap said adjacent sub-images, together with these adjacent sub-images 6 in a second merging step. Furthermore, in a third merging step it makes sense to merge a sub-image 6 anew between all of the adjacent sub-images 6, when all of the adjacent sub-images 6 are present. With this renewed merging step earlier merging errors can be corrected. Furthermore, in a fourth merging step all of the sub-images 6 of the composite image 4 can be merged once again after all of the sub-images are available, so it is possible with this approach to minimize a merging error of the composite image 4. Naturally not all of the four merging steps have to be executed, but rather it is possible to select one, two or three steps at random, for example, corresponding to the requirements for the composite image 4 or the requirements for the properties of the object.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2013 103 971 | Apr 2013 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2014/034477 | 4/17/2014 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2014/172530 | 10/23/2014 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3309262 | Copeland et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
| 3525803 | Smart | Aug 1970 | A |
| 3765851 | White | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3862909 | Copeland | Jan 1975 | A |
| 4000417 | Adkisson et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4079248 | Lehureau et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4148752 | Burger et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4404683 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4477185 | Berger et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4595829 | Neumann et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4673988 | Jansson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4684799 | Emoto et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4737022 | Faltermeier et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4760385 | Jansson et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4761075 | Matsushita et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4836667 | Ozeki | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4958920 | Jorgens et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4962264 | Forester | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5287272 | Rutenberg et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5297034 | Weinstien | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5297215 | Yamagishi | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5311426 | Donohue et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5367401 | Saulietis | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5428690 | Bacus et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5473706 | Bacus et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5530237 | Sato et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5546323 | Bacus et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5561556 | Weissman et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5581637 | Cass et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5655028 | Soil et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659174 | Kaneoka et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5675141 | Kukihara | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5686960 | Sussman | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5696589 | Bernacki | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5737084 | Ishihara | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5793969 | Kamentsky et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5836877 | Zavislan | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5864138 | Miyata et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5891619 | Zakim et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5924074 | Evans | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5947167 | Bogen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6008892 | Kain et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6031930 | Bacus et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6043475 | Shimada et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6061176 | Shih | May 2000 | A |
| 6078681 | Silver | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6091075 | Shibata et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6091842 | Domanik et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6101265 | Bacus et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6130745 | Manian et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6147797 | Lee | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6205235 | Roberts | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6208374 | Clinch | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6215892 | Douglass et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226352 | Salb | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6226392 | Bacus et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6248995 | Tanaami et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6272235 | Bacus et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6396941 | Bacus et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6404906 | Bacus et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6466690 | Bacus et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6522774 | Bacus et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6529271 | Engelhardt | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6606413 | Zeineh | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6671393 | Hays et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6674881 | Bacus et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6674884 | Bacus et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6678398 | Wolters et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6684092 | Zavislan | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6711283 | Soenksen | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6735531 | Rhett et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6775402 | Bacus et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6800249 | de la Torre-Bueno | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6800853 | Ohkura | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6812446 | Kreh | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6834237 | Noergaard et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6838650 | Toh | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6847481 | Ludl et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6847729 | Clinch et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6947583 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6959720 | Kurihara et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6982741 | Fiedler | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6993169 | Wetzel et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7009638 | Gruber et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7016109 | Nakagawa | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7027627 | Levin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7031507 | Bacus et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7071969 | Stimson | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7098634 | Yu | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7110586 | Bacus et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7110645 | Birk et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7133545 | Douglass et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7136518 | Griffin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7141802 | Takeyama et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7146372 | Bacus et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7149332 | Bacus et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7171030 | Foran et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7194118 | Harris et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7196300 | Watkins et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7209287 | Lauer | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7212660 | Wetzel et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7224839 | Zeineh | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7233340 | Hughes et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7248403 | Nakagawa | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7250963 | Yuri et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7292251 | Gu | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7297910 | Fomitchov | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7301133 | Weiss | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7349482 | Kim | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7359548 | Douglass et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7391894 | Zeineh | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7394482 | Olschewski | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7394979 | Luther et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7396508 | Richards et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7400342 | Gaida et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7400983 | Feingold et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7406215 | Clune et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7421102 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7426345 | Takamatsu et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7428325 | Douglass et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7433026 | Wolpert et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7456377 | Zeineh et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7463761 | Eichhorn et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7482600 | Seyfried | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7483554 | Kotsianti et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7486329 | Endo | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7502519 | Eichhorn et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7542596 | Bacus et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7550699 | Marshall | Jun 2009 | B1 |
| 7584019 | Feingold et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7596249 | Bacus et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7602524 | Eichhorn et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7623697 | Hughes et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7630113 | Sase et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7633616 | Hing | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7642093 | Tseung et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7653300 | Fujiyoshi et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7657070 | Lefebvre | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7663078 | Virag et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7677289 | Hayworth et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689024 | Eichhorn et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7738688 | Eichhorn et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7756309 | Gholap et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7756357 | Yoneyama | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7778485 | Zeineh et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7822257 | Endo et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7840300 | Harker | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7856131 | Bacus et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7860292 | Eichhorn et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7864414 | Sase et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7869641 | Wetzel et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7873193 | De La Torre-Bueno et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7876948 | Wetzel et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| RE42220 | Clinch et al. | Mar 2011 | E |
| 7901941 | Tseung et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7912267 | Kawano et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7916916 | Zeineh | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7920163 | Kossin | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7925067 | Bacus et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7944608 | Hayashi et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949161 | Kawanabe et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7957057 | Sase et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7967057 | Kunii et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7978894 | Soenksen et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8000560 | Shirota | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8000562 | Morales et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8036868 | Zeineh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8074547 | Ito et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8077959 | Dekel et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8085296 | Yuguchi et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8094902 | Crandall et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8094914 | Iki | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8098279 | Sase et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8098956 | Tatke et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8103082 | Olson et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8125534 | Shimonaka | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8159547 | Kawashima | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8174763 | Guiney et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8187536 | Graupner et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8199358 | Eichhorn et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8203575 | Molnar et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8283176 | Bland et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8304704 | Hing et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8305434 | Nakatsuka et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8306298 | Bacus et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8306300 | Bacus et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8339703 | Knebel | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8350904 | Fujimoto et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8366857 | Hayworth et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8385619 | Soenksen | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8385686 | Sano | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8388891 | Lefebvre | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8394635 | Key et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8396669 | Cocks | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8463741 | Ehlke et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8473035 | Frangioni | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8476585 | Galloway | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8501435 | Gustafsson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8565480 | Eichhorn et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8565503 | Eichhorn et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8582489 | Eichhorn et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8582849 | Eichhorn et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8673642 | Key et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8687858 | Walter et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8725237 | Bryant-Greenwood et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8730315 | Yoneyama | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8744213 | Tatke et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8747746 | Lefebvre | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8771978 | Ragan | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8788217 | Feingold et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8796038 | Williamson, IV | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8827760 | Ushibo et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8923597 | Eichhorn et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9310598 | Hing et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 20010035752 | Kormos et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020169512 | Stewart | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020176160 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020176161 | Yoneyama et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030048931 | Johnson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030098921 | Endo | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030112330 | Yuri et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030112504 | Czarnetzki et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030133009 | Brown | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156276 | Bowes | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040021936 | Czarnetzki et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040027462 | Hing | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040080758 | Ban | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040090667 | Gartner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040113043 | Ishikawa et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040129858 | Czarnetzki et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040135061 | Kreh | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040141660 | Barth et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050057812 | Raber | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050073649 | Spector | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090017 | Morales | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050094262 | Spediacci et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050112537 | Wu | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050211874 | Takeyama et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219688 | Kawano et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050221351 | Jekwam | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239113 | Ryu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050248837 | Sase | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050258335 | Oshiro et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060039583 | Bickert et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060045388 | Zeineh | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060077536 | Bromage et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060088940 | Feingold et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098861 | See et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060146283 | Baumann et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060164623 | Wagner et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060171560 | Manus | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060179992 | Kermani | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070025606 | Gholap et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091324 | Paul et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070098237 | Yoo et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070102620 | Bublitz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070164194 | Kurata et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198001 | Bauch et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070207061 | Yang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070224699 | Gates | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070285768 | Kawanabe et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080002252 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080020128 | van Ryper et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080054156 | Fomitchov | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080095424 | Iki | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080095467 | Olszak | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080142708 | Workman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080180794 | Tafas et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080240613 | Dietz et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283722 | Uchiyama et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090040322 | Leberl et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090046298 | Betzig | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090116101 | Tafas et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140169 | Niehren | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195688 | Henderson | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100000383 | Koos et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100020157 | Jelinek et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100039507 | Imade | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100074489 | Bacus et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100093022 | Hayworth et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100102571 | Yang | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100109725 | Yun et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100118133 | Walter et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100118393 | Lin | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100134655 | Kuroiwa | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141751 | Uchida | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141752 | Yamada | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141753 | Olson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100171809 | Fujiyoshi | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177166 | Eichhorn et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100188738 | Epple et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100194873 | Viereck et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100201800 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100225668 | Tatke et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100260407 | Eichhorn et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100279342 | Kijima et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295932 | Yokomachi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100310139 | Kimura | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110017902 | Hing et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110037847 | Soenksen | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110038523 | Boardman | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110043663 | Tsuchiya | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110064296 | Dixon | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110074817 | Shinichi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110102571 | Yoneyama | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110109735 | Otsuka | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145755 | Bacus et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110181622 | Bacus et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110221881 | Shirota et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110316993 | Chen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110316999 | Yoneyama et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120002043 | Nitta | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120002892 | Eichhorn et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120038979 | Hing et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120044342 | Hing et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120069171 | Kodaira et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120069344 | Liu | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076391 | Dietz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076411 | Dietz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076436 | Dietz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120081536 | Kuppig et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120114204 | Olson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120120225 | Maddison | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120127297 | Baxi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120163680 | Lefebvre | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120208184 | Ragan | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120281931 | Eichhorn et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130003172 | Widzgowski et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130076886 | Ikeno et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130140459 | Galloway | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130162802 | Soenksen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130164781 | Lefebvre | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130182922 | Kil | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130216451 | Hayworth et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130250090 | Morimoto | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140030757 | Schiffenbauer | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140049632 | Hemmer | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140051158 | Nakajima et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140085453 | Yamane | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140086463 | Meetz et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140087411 | Chow et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098376 | Hashimshony et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140112560 | Soenksen | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140118528 | Wolff et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140130613 | Adiga et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140137715 | Sneyders et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140273086 | Lefebvre | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150015578 | Eichhorn et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150153552 | Loney et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150153555 | Loney et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150153556 | Loney et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150177504 | Bickert et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 20030142882 | Jul 2003 | AU |
| 2504245 | Nov 2006 | CA |
| 102782557 | Nov 2012 | CN |
| 102841079 | Dec 2012 | CN |
| 102009012293 | Mar 2009 | DE |
| 1447699 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 2051051 | Apr 2009 | EP |
| 2110696 | Oct 2009 | EP |
| 2169379 | Mar 2010 | EP |
| 2620537 | Mar 1989 | FR |
| 03092 | Nov 1906 | GB |
| 59071018 | Apr 1984 | JP |
| 61248168 | Nov 1986 | JP |
| S63206793 | Aug 1988 | JP |
| 09080138 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| 09133856 | May 1997 | JP |
| 9161068 | Jun 1997 | JP |
| 09218354 | Aug 1997 | JP |
| 2001281553 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2002031513 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 200284554 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2006003543 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 2006343595 | Dec 2006 | JP |
| 2009192824 | Feb 2008 | JP |
| 2008262100 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2009-036969 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 201201392 | Jan 2012 | TW |
| WO-0154052 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO-2005015120 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO-2008118886 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO-2008141009 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO-2010105015 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO-2012024627 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Non final office action”, AU Application No. 201453889, (dated May 18, 2016). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Non final office action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/138,740, (dated Jul. 1, 2016). |
| Forrest, K. , et al., “Tunneling calculations for GaAs—AlxGa(1-x)As graded band-gap sawtooth superlattices”, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 26, No. 6, (Jun. 1990), 1067-1074. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,955. |
| Haruhisa, S., et al., “Application of telepathology for improvement of therapeutic effects and economic efficiency, and development of new equipment for it”, Science Links Japan; http://sciencelinks.jp/j-east/article/200516/000020051605A0431066.php, Journal Code: N20051113, (2005), 166-125. |
| Sakura Finetek, PCT Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 13, 2011 for Int'l Application No. PCT/US2011/048488., 13 pages. |
| Sakura Finetek, EPO Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2013 for EPO App No. 10719379.9. |
| Sakura Finetek, Australian Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2013 for Australian App No. 2010222633. |
| Sakura Finetek, Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2013 for JP App No. P2011-553548. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Australian Examination Report dated Dec. 24, 2013 for AU 2011291517. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Chinese second office action dated Dec. 27, 2013 for CN201080017649.4. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Final office action dated Sep. 2, 2014 for Japanese App No. 2011-553548. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Examination Report dated Jun. 19, 2014 for Australian App No. 2011291517. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., PCT Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 22, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/034477, 12 pages. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Chinese Final Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2014 for CN Application No. 201080017649.4. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,955. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., European second office action dated Nov. 6, 2014 for EP Appln. No. 10719379.9. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., et al., Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2014 for CN 201180047558.X. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., et al., Australian Examination Report dated Feb. 2, 2015 for App No. 2011291517. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., et al., European Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2015 for EP App. No. 11749675.2. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Final office action dated Apr. 15, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,955. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Non final office action dated Apr. 8, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,827. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Partial European search report for Application No. 14198636.4, (dated Apr. 28, 2015). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., et al., Canadian Examiners Report dated Dec. 7, 2012 for CA 2,755,164. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., et al., International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 7, 2013 for PCT/US2011/048488. |
| Sakura Finetek USA, Extended Search Report for EP15154503 dated Jun. 19, 2015. |
| Sensovation AG, PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 20, 2011 for Int'l Application No. PCT/IB2010/000518., 7 pages. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., International search report and written opinion for PCT/US2014/034477, (dated Sep. 22, 2014). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/034477, (dated Oct. 29, 2015). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Final office action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,827, (dated Oct. 20, 2015). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Supplementary Search Report”, EP Application No. 14784707.3, (dated Oct. 4, 2016). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Office Action”, JP Application No. 2016-507909, (dated Sep. 15, 2016). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., “Extended Search Report”, EP Application No. 14198636, (dated Sep. 30, 2015). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Examination Report”, CA Application No. 2908058, (dated Nov. 16, 2016). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 15194968.2, (dated Mar. 18, 2016). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Final Rejection”, JP Application No. P2013-525005, (dated Dec. 27, 2016). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “First Office Action with search report”, CN Application No. 2014800218372, (dated Nov. 30, 2016). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Fourth Office Action”, CN Application No. 201180047558X, (dated Oct. 24, 2016). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Notice of rejection”, JP Application No. 2013-525005, (dated Feb. 9, 2016). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Second office action”, CN Application No. 201180047558.X, (dated Jul. 6, 2015). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Third Office Action”, CN Application No. 201180047558X, (dated Apr. 1, 2016). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Examiner's Report”, CA Application No. 2808105, dated Jun. 12, 2017. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Examiner's Report”, CA Application No. 2908058, dated Jul. 24, 2017. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Final Office Action”, JP Application No. 2016-507909, dated Apr. 28, 2017. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Non final office action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/138,740, dated Jun. 20, 2017. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Non final office action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/212,955, dated Aug. 9, 2017. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Second Office Action”, CN Application No. 2014800218372, dated Aug. 1, 2017. |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/138,740, (dated Jan. 26, 2017). |
| Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., “First Office Action”, EP Application No. 15194968.2, (dated Mar. 10, 2017). |
| Sakura Finetek USA Inc., “Office Action”, EP Application No. 15154503.5, (dated Feb. 28, 2017). |
| Requirement for Restriction/Election dated Nov. 3, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,827. |
| Office Action received for Eurasian Patent Application No. 201001786, dated Jan. 21, 2014. |
| Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85) dated Dec. 16, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/255,827. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IB2010/000518, dated Jul. 16, 2010, 16 pages (8 pages of English Translation and 8 pages of Original Document). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160055622 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
