1. Field of the Invention
The field of this invention relates to a global resource sharing of logically linked (using if-then-else, case statement, compile embedded, etc.) and integrated functionality for building solutions. More specifically, the present invention relates to means for creating completed solutions based on sharing of page-source code and settings parameters that can be logically linked at the global resource sharing level. Also, there are other means for providing services to a broad base of solutions at the resource sharing level by integrating services to all solutions at the resource, like, foreign language translation, page rendering, securities, etc.
2. Prior Art
It always has been the goal to facilitate the building of complete software solutions by simplifying the approaches used in software development and integration. Since the early days of software development tools and techniques have been devised, created and integrated as part of the software building processes.
One of the first techniques has been the creation of software routines and procedures where code repetition can be integrate at one location and used throughout the software development cycle by calling them without having to repeat the programming effort.
As the software development matured other techniques sufficed as well, like, the Dynamic Linking Library (DLL). With DLL many application solutions can use them, and they are linked to the application solution at runtime as needed.
Lately other software development techniques have been devised as well, like Microsoft .NET technology where any computer language shares the resource where many DLL's are integrated at the resource level and available to any application and any solution at runtime.
Each step in the software development evolution the goal has been to facilitate the development and integration of software logic by having more ready-solved software logic code blocks located at one location, at the resource level.
Although all the prior enhancements addresses a peculiar problem, insofar, none truly integrate all the development at the resource level by having all these ready-solved software logic code blocks that can be logically linked and shared by any application and any solution at the resource level.
It is the object of this invention to offer easy solution means in the development and integration of software application that can be logically linked to any solution thus reducing development cycle by having a resource sharing that applications and solutions can be developed and integrated by having them logically linked without repeating efforts. This invention will allow application and solution development to be located at one global resource location that can be shared over a network or over the Internet as needed.
It is the object of this invention to demonstrate a global resource sharing of logically linked software code blocks, application pages and application page's settings that can be shared in house over a network or globally over the Internet.
It will further have the ability to logically link code block to pages, have these pages grouped into an application then have these applications grouped into a solution without repeating the programming effort. All that will need is to program the required code blocks to integrate the solution under development. As more logically linked code blocks are developed and integrated at the global resource, more applications will be able to use them and have more functionality without any new efforts or expenses.
Also, it will have the ability to share settings parameters, foreign language translation, securities and other future solutions as well at the resource level and at a single global location.
For instance, once a logically linked code block, application page, a settings parameters, interfaces, etc., are developed, their integration to a final solution can be done by simply dragging-and-dropping them to the solution's resource container.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in the form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention:
a illustrates a further embodiment of the resources sharing container.
a illustrates a further embodiment of
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, the present invention may be embodied as a method, software development technique of resources sharing container, or a computer program product. Accordingly, the present invention may take a form of an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable program code means embodied in the medium. Any computer readable medium may be utilized including hard disks, CD-ROMs, optical storage devices, or magnetic devices.
Furthermore, any reference to names of a product or of a company is for the purpose of clarifying our discussion and they are registered to their respective owners.
I) Overview of the Resources Sharing Container.
The resources sharing container contains all the required components for building robust logic-pages, applications and their integration to solutions. The resources sharing container can be programmed, database integrated by the user-supplied data stored in tables or the combination of both.
Once it is programmed or data is stored within, they can be shared by any page, application or solution. Also, changes and upgrades need be applied to the resources sharing container only once without having the redistribution efforts and expenses associated with new software versions.
Also, by having a logically linking mechanism at the resource level, once a solution is integrated it can be virtually replicated by simply registering it to a different user. The user can be a company owner of the solution. The first solution becomes a template-mode for its virtual replication. It is like having a single car that can be driven by the whole family at the same time at different locations and tailored to each individual family-member as per each individual tastes and preferences.
Moreover, the resources sharing container has all of the requirements to integrate program code and other parameters related means to a page. Then the page can be integrated to an application, finally, the application can be integrated to one or more solutions. In other words, the resources sharing container has pieces of program code, settings, interfacing, rendering parameters, etc. It can be located in the database, user supplied files or user input.
Each part of the resources sharing container is like a plug in, but may not be associated to any specific page, application or solution. Therefore, they are loose by making and ready to be plugged in into a page, application or solution as required. The plug in mechanism functions like an electric switch. Except it is a logic switch, switching program code, settings, interfacing, etc., in and out as needed.
Furthermore, the resources sharing container can be compared to an electrical wiring system and all the devices connected thereof. Each device connected to an electrical wring system usually has a switch of some sort, to switch it on and off. At the resources sharing container, the switching is done with the use of program logic.
Lets proceed with the example of the devices connected to the electrical wring system. If these devices were integrated at the resources sharing container, each device could have been of any shape, size, colors, and so on. Lets say that a light bulb is the device that we're talking about. Now, if the light bulb were within the resources sharing container. The light bulb could've been of any size, shape, color, intensity, and so on. Not only that, but the light bulb would've been only one and replicated, reshaped, resized, etc., according to each one needs and preferences.
Lets move on and learn how this process works by turning to
As we progress, it will become clear how each one interacts within the resources sharing container. The logic functionalities 110 contain all the code-logic, program code, logic-linking nodes, applications and solutions setting, translations, securities, etc., and they have the logic-linking mechanism for their integration to any page, application of solution. The Application Requirements 120 are the user defined needs for the integration of pages to applications, and the integration of applications to solutions. The Solution 130 is the final user-defined solution and it is the byproduct of Logic Functionalities 110, and Application Requirements 120.
Turning to
As it is with any software solution, it is programmed as components and later integrated (linked) to code-pages at machine runtime. The two most popular are DLL (dynamic linking library) and the latest Microsoft .NET. They both are linked at runtime. DLL's are integrated at the operating system level and are registered with the operating system and they can be shared by any application, that is, they are dynamically linked to applications at runtime. The .NET shares some similarities with its predecessor DLL. It is linked at runtime but it is part of the .NET resource infrastructure that allows the creation of binaries (compiled code that is read by a binary interpreter) and it is language independent.
Unlike DLL's and .NET, logically linked pages, application and solutions are not dynamically linked at runtime. The linking process is done automatically by the resource and it is based on each application requirements. That is the reason it is called logic-linked. As it has been mentioned before, the resource can contain all kind of parameter-based files, database tables, program code block and many other techniques can be developed and used as well, from now on their combinations will be referred as logic-linking components. Once these logic-linking components are integrated at the resources sharing container they are free to be logic-linked to any solution and not being specific to any page, application or solution.
II) Logic-Linking Pages within the Resources Sharing Container.
Lets delve a little further into the logic-linking process and turn to
III) Logic-Linking Nodes within a Page.
Lets proceed by turning to
The “Settings” 420 and “Template” 424 are both user supplied. Both of them will be integrated to the user's specific solutions and not having any effect to any other solutions therewith.
IV) The Sharing of the Resources Sharing Container by Solutions.
Continuing with
“Page A” 418 is linked through logic-link “L1” 410 and it can be used, logically linked, by any of the above solutions. “Settings” 420 shows logic-link “L2” 412 and “Template” 424 shows logic-link “L3” 416. These two are logically linked to their respective user's solutions and not necessarily linked to the Resources Sharing Container, although they can be linked to Resources Sharing Container as well. “Translation” 422 is linked (integrated/embedded) to the Resources Sharing Container and shown by the “arrow” 414. Translation is available to all solutions.
The purpose of this Figure arrangement is to illustrate that more than one solution can be integrated by having the same pages logically linked to any one of them in any arrangement. The explanation for the other solutions (Solution B 404, Solution C 406 and Solution D 408) are as for the above one, and anyone skilled in the art will be able to follow its explanation and understand the other ones as well.
V) A Database Table Representing the Resources Sharing Container.
As we turn to
Lets proceed with
VI) A Logic-Linking Method in a Page.
Continuing with
VII) Applications and Solutions Requirements.
We'll be using
Lets review what has been done and turn to
The means for supplying these requirements to the resources can be in the form of check boxes, uploaded files, part of the resources sharing container itself or any other user supplied means. Other kind o requirements can be include when needed, as well.
The same explanation applies to
Once these application requirements are supplied to the resources sharing container, they can be stored in a database table or any other storing means. Also, the process of supplying requirements can be done with check boxes, pull down menus, drag-and-drop, etc.
We'll be using
Row #2 relates to
VIII) Linking Applications to Solutions.
Once application requirements are supplied to an application and it has all of its necessary logic requirements for its support then it is ready to be logically integrated to one or more solutions and the receiving solution will be able to launch them as needed. As we turn to
As we turn to
Lets review the database table 1600 of
IX) The Process of Virtual Replication of Solutions.
Once requirements are supplied to an application and the application is logically-integrated to a solution, the solution is ready for the final replication and use by any number of users. This process is much like the replication of software in CD's or any other recording media. The only difference is that, the replicating process is done virtually. Since the application-logic, application requirements, solution and its respective applications reside in the resources sharing container. They can be replicated by just assigning the solution to a user.
As we review
Lets proceed to
Proceeding to
After a user logs in and the solution for the user is loaded and resources are created, they are presented for the user's selection and can be of any form for selecting an application within the user's solution. A linking means will be illustrated later on.
Lets turn to
Once the user selects any of the application links, lets say that the first link, “FirstApp” is selected. Now lets move to database table 1920 ID #1 (first row) and last column (Code_Logic). At the “Code_Logic” column there is the value of “PLLinks=L2;L3”. Now, the program logic will fetch the value “PLLinks=L2;L3” and extract the values “L2” and “L3” then it will formulate a Structured Query Language (SQL) statement (not shown for simplicity) and search the column “PPLink_ID” of database table 2000 of
Lets review this process from the beginning. The user selects the solution link for “GlobalSol” and “FirstApp”, “SecondApp” and “ThirdApp” links are displayed. The user selects the link for “FirstApp” and the links for “Second Page” and “Third Page” (SolutionResource_ID database table 2000—
Before we move on, lets review the last row of
The applications and solution we've discussed, can be any commercial solution, like, accounting and the applications can be like, accounts payable, accounts receivable, inventory, etc., and they are part of the solution accounting.
X) The Creation of Resources.
There are two-kind of resources: application resource and solution resource, and they both can be replicated and assigned to a user for the application and the solution holder of the application(s). The replication process takes place at runtime as the resources sharing container retrieves various parameters from storage sources like: database tables, files, and other means as well, it process them and they are used to create the new application and/or solution for the requesting user.
The application resource contains all the necessary information to launch the application and the solution resource contains all the necessary information to launch itself along with all of its applications as well. It is at this time that logic linking takes places and information is loaded from files, also, fetched from database tables.
We'll be using
Lets skip
XI) Rendering a Solution.
We'll be using
XII) Launching a Solution.
We'll be using
Lastly, after the menu choices are displayed on the screen and inside the menu-bar, the process for displaying a menu dropdown for one of its choice begins by executing the next line “load=A3” and the code block “A3” is executed 2810 and it has the program code-logic 2820 is used to display the menu dropdown. The menu dropdown 2800 has the choices for the “Choice_A” 2700 (Choice_A{Choice GlobalSolY:GlobalSol;}) and they are two solutions. Lets concentrate in the solution that we've discussed so far, the “GlobalSol”. The “GlobalSol” link is shown at
After an end user at a client access the resources sharing container it will start at a page within a folder assigned to the user's solution. The page will have all the information that is required to launch the user's solution. Once the user's solution is launched it start the process at
After a link for an application page is selected the page will be launched according to its logic-code requirements, program code-logic will be logically linked and the page will be executed. The complete process has been explained for
Many more arrangements can be created and incorporated in this invention. While it has been fully described in connection with the illustrated embodiments, it will be appreciated and understood that modifications may be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. We've used examples of code-logic although it can be any other means for linking a program-code component to a page, a page to an application and an application to a solution. Furthermore, this invention will allow the creation of easy of use, low maintenance and virtual replication without the overhead that other currently available solutions require.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5159687 | Richburg | Oct 1992 | A |
5421012 | Khoyi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5634095 | Wang et al. | May 1997 | A |
5890175 | Wong et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903859 | Stone et al. | May 1999 | A |
5999915 | Nahan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018742 | Herbert, III | Jan 2000 | A |
6028940 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028997 | Leymann et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029141 | Bezzos et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6141666 | Tobin | Oct 2000 | A |
6233726 | Bowman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249772 | Walker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6374400 | Pickett | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6493661 | White, III et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513153 | Lee | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6556975 | Wittsche | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6601043 | Purcell | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6658571 | O'Brien et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6901376 | Sculler et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901378 | Linker et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6907401 | Vittal et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7007076 | Hess et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013289 | Horn et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7080089 | Plaisted et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7162723 | Gouthrie et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7318216 | Diab | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7321917 | Durham | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7415704 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415709 | Hip et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7546576 | Egli | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574381 | Lin-Hendel | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7587721 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20010007979 | Teshima | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010056377 | Kondoh et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020049961 | Fang et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020113809 | Akazawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020152131 | Lee | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178271 | Graham et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184104 | Littman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004746 | Kheirolomoom et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030074634 | Emmelmann | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093433 | Seaman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120560 | Almeida | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030154135 | Covington et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040143822 | Jager et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181464 | Vanker et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205690 | Pieper | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216132 | Messec et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040237064 | Liu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050015303 | Dubin et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050198647 | Hip et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204357 | Garg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262181 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278617 | Martell et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011720 | Call | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060080640 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070174414 | Song et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080052615 | Almeida | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100005009 | Lin-Hendel | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060282837 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |