Patent Application
20060292809
The invention generally relates to methods of fabrication of integrated circuits (ICs). More specifically, the invention is a method of fabricating heterojunction bipolar transistors utilizing elemental or compound semiconducting materials and resulting devices produced by such methods.
Bipolar transistors are an advantageous choice over field effect transistors due to their superior current-drive performance, high frequency response characteristics, and power-handling ability. Consequently, research and development of bipolar transistors using not only silicon (or other group IV materials) but also compound semiconductors (e.g., compounds of elements, especially elements from periodic table groups III-V and II-VI) has seen increased activity in recent years.
Significant growth in both high-frequency wired and wireless markets has introduced new opportunities where compound semiconductors such as SiGe have unique advantages over bulk complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology. With the rapid advancement of epitaxial layer pseudomorphic SiGe deposition processes, epitaxial-base SiGe heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBTs) have been integrated with mainstream advanced CMOS development for wide market acceptance, providing the advantages of SiGe technology for analog RF (radio frequency) circuitry while maintaining the utilization of the advanced CMOS technology base for digital logic circuitry.
In particular, heterojunction bipolar transistors that use compound semiconductors possess a significant advantage in being able to hold the emitter injection efficiency at a high level even when the base is doped to a high concentration by making the gap of the forbidden band of the emitter to be greater than that of the base. An HBT has an emitter region in which the bandgap is greater than the bandgap in the base region. An essential feature of the HBT is that the bandgap offsets at the conduction and valence bands between the emitter region and the base region suppresses hole injection and increases electron injection. As a result, the HBT has a higher injection efficiency than does a transistor having a constant bandgap in the emitter and base regions.
Additional advantages of an HBT over other transistor types include a larger current-drive capacity per unit area, a smaller sensitivity of switching speed to output loading, and a nearly fixed turn-on voltage. Aside from using gallium arsenide for fabricating super high frequency transistors, SiGe HBTs, because of their lower fabrication costs, have found increased use in high frequency areas. The sequence of layers in such transistors generally consists of a silicon collector layer, a base layer of p-doped silicon germanium, and an emitter layer.
Silicon (Si) interstitial pairing with boron (B) results in a rate of diffusion that is much greater than occurs with boron alone. The intrinsic diffusion coefficient (DSi) of silicon in silicon is approximately 560 whereas the intrinsic diffusion coefficient of boron (DB) in silicon is approximately 1. Incorporating carbon (C) into boron-doped silicon minimizes a Si—B pair formation and thus reduces an overall rate of boron outdiffusion. In an HBT device, the reduced boron outdiffusion results in less spreading of a p-type SiGe base region. Narrow base widths reduce transit times of minority carriers and improve a device shutoff frequency, ft.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,750,484 to Lippert et al., entitled “Silicon Germanium Hetero Bipolar Transistor” describes a silicon-germanium (SiGe) heterojunction bipolar transistor comprising a silicon collector layer, a boron-doped silicon-germanium base layer, and a silicon emitter layer. The device of Lippert depends on a direct injection of carbon which occurs concurrently with a boron incorporation step during a CVD SiGe growth process. Also, Lippert adds carbon “simultaneously with the epitaxy of all three individual layers: the collector layer, the base layer and the emitter layer” (col. 3, lines 59-61) to reduce boron outdiffusion.
However, such direct injection techniques frequently lead to deleterious effects such as increased base resistance (likely due to increased impurity scattering and/or a reduction in an electrically active dopant) causing a reduction in a maximum operating frequency, updiffusion of oxygen into the SiGe base region (oxygen may decrease minority carrier lifetimes and increase base current), and outdiffusion of germanium (affecting a shape and, consequently, a function of emitter-base and collector-base energy band offsets).
Additionally, direct injection necessitates an increased process complexity, leading to reduced process control, by requiring, for example, a methyl silane injection (or another carbon precursor) to be injected concurrently with diborane (or another boron precursor), silane (or another silicon precursor), and a hydrogen carrier gas. Such a complex precursor flow results in complex and frequently competing reactions coupled with an increase in process recipe complexity due to, inter alia, additional flow and temperature monitoring requirements.
Therefore, what is needed is a reproducible and economical method to produce HBT devices that have a high shutoff frequency and reduced base resistance, without deleterious effects such as outdiffusion of germanium or updiffusion of oxygen.
A heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT) is frequently used in ultra-high speed circuits, as well as in optical transmission circuits with rates in excess of 10 Gbits/sec. HBT devices have a high transconductance typical of bipolar devices and are additionally capable of high-power operation. To achieve the aforementioned characteristics, HBT devices are generally of the npn type, preferably with a thin, heavily doped base. The thin, heavily doped base maintains a low base-spreading resistance, leading to a high maximum oscillation frequency. As base dimensions decrease, there is a concomitant decrease in a diffusion time of minority carriers across the base. Therefore, the base should be as narrow as possible for high performance.
In order to maintain a high doping concentration while minimizing outdiffusion of the dopant material, carbon may be doped into the base region to a level between about 0.1% and 5%. Details of the carbon dopant techniques and procedures are described with respect to fabrication of an exemplary HBT device, infra. Although a particular fabrication process is presented, a skilled artisan will recognize that the carbon injection techniques described herein are readily amenable to other fabrication processes such as lateral HBT and vertical thin-film transistor (VTF) formation and various other FET devices, including those with self-aligned techniques (utilizing, for example, oxide spacers).
The present invention is therefore a method of fabricating a silicon-germanium heterojunction bipolar transistor. An exemplary method includes forming a n+ buried layer in a p-type substrate, depositing an n-type semiconductor epitaxial layer over the buried layer, forming a p-type base region, forming n-type emitter and collector regions, and injecting carbon remote from the p-type base region and allowing the carbon to diffuse into the base region. “Remote” injection refers to (1) adding carbon to the base region either before or after other dopants have been added (i.e., the carbon is not added (e.g., implanted or diffused) at the same type as another dopant species (e.g., boron), and (2) adding carbon indirectly to the base region by adding the carbon to an adjacent or proximal region and not directly into the neutral base itself.
The present invention is also a heterojunction bipolar transistor fabricated by methods presented herein. An exemplary HBT includes substantially-silicon collector and emitter layers with a heavily-doped base layer made substantially of boron-doped silicon-germanium. The base layer is disposed between the emitter layer and the collector layer. The base layer incorporates the remotely-injected carbon in a level of between about 0.1% and 5%, to prevent the outdiffusion of boron and additionally eliminates or minimizes the deleterious effects of the prior art.
With reference to
With reference to
Either before or after the boron base implant 116 step, an additional carbon implantation or diffusion step (not shown) may be performed, thus injecting carbon atoms into the n-epitaxial layer 105 and surrounding regions within the SiGe. Alternatively, the carbon implantation or diffusion step may be performed into the silicon dioxide isolation layer 119. The carbon is derived from a carbon precursor (e.g., CH3SiH3). Carbon precursor injection can be accomplished by techniques such as LPCVD (low pressure chemical vapor deposition), UHCVD (ultra-high vacuum CVD), MBE (molecular beam epitaxy), or ion implantation. The carbon injection is followed by a thermal anneal step. The thermal anneal step allows the carbon to diffuse into the p-type base region 117. Note that, even though a carbon precursor may be injected outside of the p-type base region 117, the position of the carbon after anneal is within the SiGe base region due to an energetically favorable diffusion mechanism. Therefore, remote injection is a means of doping the SiGe with carbon and provides numerous advantages over conventional fabrication methods, discussed supra (e.g., preventing boron outdiffusion thus allowing a higher boron dopant concentration and preventing updiffusion of residual oxygen into the base region). Note that “updiffusion” refers to a diffusion gradient from a lower concentration to higher concentration area. In this context, the updiffusion is with reference to oxygen. Further, remote injection results in a reduced base resistance as compared with direct injection. Therefore, a location of injection and not necessarily a final resting place of carbon following thermal cycles determines a definition of remote carbon injection. Additional embodiments describing other carbon injection techniques and locations are discussed in more detail, infra.
After additional etching of the silicon dioxide insulation layer 119 so as to expose the p-base region 117 and a remaining portion of the n-epitaxial layer 105 (
With reference to
Alternative remote carbon injection techniques (with CH3SiH3 or other carbon precursor) may take place at other times or locations other than those discussed in the previous embodiment. For example, the remote carbon injection may take place into either Si (e.g., the substrate 103 or the n+ buried layer 103 (FIGS. 1A-1F)) or various places within the SiGe layers (the n-epitaxial layer 105). Carbon injection temperatures generally range from about 300° C. to 1000° C. Variations in exact times and temperatures can be used to tailor the carbon incorporation and, consequently, an effect of the carbon on boron and germanium (Ge) outdiffusion and strain. The injection can occur during or after, either growth or implantation of the emitter region 127, the collector region 129, or the base region 117. If self-aligning techniques incorporating oxide (or another dielectric material) spacers are employed, the injection can occur during or after growth of a base-emitter spacer (BE) or a base-collector spacer (BC). (Note: formation of neither the BE nor BC spacer are shown but such techniques are well-known in the art). Carbon injection may be performed at multiple points during fabrication of either the base, BC, BE, collector, and/or emitter regions. Thermal anneal cycles are then implemented to provide activation energy for the carbon to diffuse from the dielectric spacer into the one or more various SiGe regions. A final position of carbon after anneal is within the SiGe through a diffusion mechanism. Advantages of remote carbon injection include: (1) reduced boron outdiffusion; (2) a mitigation of an updiffusion of oxygen (oxygen would normally diffuse from surrounding layers into the SiGe base region 117 during thermal anneal cycles, thereby limiting a maximum frequency of the HBT device); (3) a significant reduction in the base resistance (consequently enhancing fmax); and (5) a resultant net increase in compressive strain in SiGe (due to an increase in a strained SiGe lattice parameter due to removal of carbon).
Further, ramped carbon profiles may be tailored to have either triangular or trapezoidal shapes by, for example, ramping gas injection during a CVD process. Tailoring a carbon profile has numerous advantages, including: (1) enhancing the reduction in boron outdiffusion; (2) optimizing or tailoring the strain at the Si—SiGe boundaries; and (3) reducing and/or optimizing the intermixing of Ge and B at the Si—SiGe boundaries. All of these advantages of tailoring the carbon profile improve performance characteristics (such reducing base resistance and transit time and thus, increasing the maximum operating frequency) of the HBT device.
In a specific exemplary embodiment, various layers of a SiGeC HBT device, along with alternative layer options, are shown textually in table 1, infra. In this exemplary embodiment, layers 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 are fabricated in-situ in a common epi reactor. Layers 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 are all potential locations for remote carbon injection.
In layer order for this specific exemplary embodiment, layer 1 is a silicon p-type substrate. Layer 2, a doped collector layer, is formed during silicon epitaxial processing and is initially doped with either a p-type or n-type dopant. For an NPN transistor, the final layer is n-type. Next, layer 3, a seed layer or collector interface layer is comprised of epitaxial, low defect, pseudomorphically-grown SiGe. Subsequent SiGe layers, 4, 5, and 6 are similarly grown. Layers 7 and 8, a silicon base-emitter interface layer and silicon emitter and contact layer respectively, are also grown, in various permutations as shown, by epitaxial techniques. Remote carbon injection techniques described herein into any or all layers 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7, result in, inter alia, (1) minimized boron outdiffusion by a substitutional reaction with silicon interstitial defects (anomalous boron diffusion occurs by Si—B pairing thus enhancing boron diffusion; carbon reacts substitutionally to inhibit the Si—B pairing); (2) a narrower boron base region results in a short transit time for carriers, thus enhancing device speed (i.e., an increased Ft); and (3) carbon “buys” thermal budget allowances due to a minimized affect of thermal energy on boron diffusion.
With reference to
An HBT device with a trapezoidal germanium concentration profile 301 of
Although the present invention is described in terms of exemplary embodiments, a skilled artisan will realize that techniques described herein can readily be adapted to other forms of fabrication techniques and devices. For example, remote injection techniques are readily amenable to both vertical and lateral bipolar device structures as well as self-aligned structures. Although reference is made exclusively to npn HBT devices, one skilled in the art will appreciate that remote injection techniques may be advantageous to numerous types of electronic devices such as emitter-collector regions of a pnp bipolar transistor or to a gate of an NMOS or PMOS transistor. Further, dopant steps are generally defined herein in terms of implantation procedures (e.g., ion implantation). A skilled artisan will recognize that other dopant techniques, such as diffusion, will also readily produce doped-regions in an electronic device.
Also, although process steps and techniques are shown and described in detail, a skilled artisan will recognize that other techniques and methods may be utilized which are still included within a scope of the appended claims. For example, there are frequently several techniques used for depositing a film layer (e.g., chemical vapor deposition, plasma-enhanced vapor deposition, molecular beam epitaxy, atomic layer deposition, atmospheric pressure CVD, etc.). Although not all techniques are amenable to all film types described herein, one skilled in the art will recognize that multiple methods for depositing a given layer and/or film type may be used.
Additionally, many industries allied with the semiconductor industry could make use of the remote carbon injection technique. For example, a thin-film head (TFH) process in the data storage industry or an active matrix liquid crystal display (AMLCD) in the flat panel display industry could readily make use of the processes and techniques described herein. The term “semiconductor” should be recognized as including the aforementioned and related industries.
