The present invention relates to a method for haptic feedback control for a control device comprising a backing plate capable of transmitting a haptic feedback, such as a vibration, to a user for example after the modification or the selection of a command.
Haptic feedback control devices comprising vibrators (such as vibrators of the “voice coil” type) are already known in which a magnet slides inside a coil or a coil slides inside a magnet in order to transmit a vibration to a touch-sensitive surface of the device.
Also known are other control devices comprising an actuator in which an armature slides between two coils. The AC supply of the coils makes it possible to attract the armature toward one or the other of the coils thus creating a vibratory oscillating effect.
The actuators are connected to the plate in order to generate a haptic feedback in a zone of movement of the finger of a user as a function of the detection of a command.
However, it may happen that the finger follows a command trajectory for which the vibration is slightly or poorly felt by the user.
The aim of the present invention is therefore to propose a haptic feedback control method which does not have the disadvantages of the prior art.
The object of the present invention is therefore to propose a method for haptic feedback control comprising a control device for transmitting a haptic feedback to a finger of a user in a zone of movement of said finger, said control device comprising:
Therefore, the plate is driven in translation in a direction perpendicular to and coplanar with the movement of the finger so that the haptic feeling perceived by the user is enhanced and that, irrespective of the trajectory of the finger, the user perceives the vibratory effect. Similarly, the speed of movement of the finger no longer has any impact on the feeling. Specifically, the generated haptic effect is no longer mainly based on the frequency of vibration generated but also on other parameters such as the direction or the speed of movement of the plate in one direction rather than the other. The haptic effect therefore no longer depends solely on the frequency of the vibration generated which could be less well perceived when it was adjacent to that of the trajectory of the finger of the user.
According to one feature of the control method, during the second step, a parameter of control of the actuators is modulated proportionally to the components of the elementary movement of said finger.
Other advantages and features will appear on reading the description of the invention and the appended drawings in which:
a and 3b are schematic views of a control device produced according to a second embodiment,
a, 4b and 4c are graphs representing control signals as a function of time for actuators of the device of
In these figures, the identical elements bear the same reference numbers. For the purpose of clarity, the steps of the control method are numbered from 100.
The invention relates to a haptic feedback control device, for example for a motor vehicle control panel, for a touch-sensitive faceplate or else for a touch-sensitive screen, that can transmit a haptic feedback to a user having for example modified or selected a command.
As shown in
The haptic feedback is for example a vibration produced by a sinusoidal control signal or by a control signal comprising one or a succession of pulses.
In the example of
Each actuator 7a, 7b comprises a fixed portion and a portion that can move in translation in a gap of the fixed portion for example of the order of 200 μm, between a first and a second position, parallel to a longitudinal axis of the movable portion. The movable portion is for example formed by a movable magnet sliding inside a fixed coil or by a movable coil sliding around a fixed magnet, the movable portion and the fixed portion interacting by electromagnetic effect.
The movable portions are connected to the plate 3 so that the movement of the movable portions causes the movement in translation of the plate 3 in order to generate the haptic feedback to the finger of the user in the zone of movement.
The movement sensor 5 comprises a sensor with a touch-sensitive surface supported by the backing plate 3 in the zone of movement of the finger. A pressure sensor with a touch-sensitive surface such as a pressure sensor with a touch-sensitive surface of FSR (for Force Sensing Resistor) technology, that is to say using pressure-sensitive resistors, is provided.
These sensors comprise flexible semiconducting layers sandwiched between for example a conductive layer and a resistive layer. By exerting a pressure or a sliding action on the FSR layer, its ohmic resistance reduces thus making it possible, by application of an appropriate electric voltage, to measure the pressure applied and/or the location of the place where the pressure is exerted.
According to a different concept of FSR technology, the touch-sensitive sensor comprises two flexible sheets of support spaced apart from one another by elastic spacers and supporting on mutually facing faces elements making it possible to make an electric contact when the sensor is compressed.
The device 1 also comprises a processing unit 9 connected to the sensor 5 in order to determine, in real time, the direction of an elementary movement dU of the finger based on signals originating from the sensor 5. The direction of the elementary movement dU is for example deduced from two successive items of positional information originating from the movement sensor 5.
The first actuator 7a is capable of driving the plate 3 in a first drive direction D1, the second actuator 7b is capable of driving the plate 3 in a second drive direction D2 and the processing unit 9 is configured to control independently the first actuator 7a and the second actuator 7b as a function of the components dX, dY of the elementary movement dU according to the first drive direction D1 and the second drive direction D2.
According to one embodiment, the processing unit 9 is configured to modulate at least one control parameter of the actuators 7a, 7b.
The controlling of the actuators 7a, 7b relative to the components dX, dY, carried out by the modulation of a control parameter of the actuators 7a, 7b, makes it possible to generate a haptic effect felt in a direction of propagation dR dependent on the trajectory t made by the control finger.
The control parameter is a control signal of the actuator, for example the amplitude of the supply current applied to the terminals of the actuators 7a, 7b.
The actuators 7a and 7b are therefore motive respectively in the drive directions D1 and D2. However, in order to allow the movement of the plate 3, the means 11 of connection between the plate 3 and the actuators 7a and 7b are designed to be deformable so as to allow a movement of the plate 3 relative to the actuators 7a, 7b in the nonmotive directions. The connection means are for example made of plastic.
Therefore, the first actuator 7a is motive in the direction D1 and the connection 11 between the plate 3 and the movable portion of the first actuator 7a can be deformed notably in the direction D2. Similarly, the second actuator 7b is motive in the direction D2 and the connection 11 between the plate 3 and the movable portion of the second actuator 7b can be deformed notably in the direction D1.
The processing unit 9 is configured to modulate at least one control parameter of the actuators 7a, 7b so that the resultant of the vibratory effect generated by said actuators 7a, 7b is felt by the finger in a direction dR substantially perpendicular to and coplanar with the direction of elementary movement dU.
Therefore, the plate 3 is driven in translation in a direction perpendicular to and coplanar with the movement of the finger so that the haptic feeling perceived by the user is improved and that, irrespective of the trajectory of the finger, the user perceives the vibratory effect. Similarly, the speed of movement of the finger no longer has any impact on the feeling. Specifically, the generated haptic effect is no longer mainly based on the frequency of vibration generated but also on other parameters such as the direction or the speed of movement of the plate 3 in one direction rather than in the other. The haptic effect therefore no longer depends solely on the frequency of the generated vibration which could be less well perceived when it was adjacent to that of the trajectory of the finger of the user.
The first actuator 7a is configured to drive the plate 3 in translation in the first drive direction D1 and the second actuator 7b is configured to drive the plate 3 in translation in the second drive direction D2 perpendicular to and coplanar with the first direction D1. For this, the movable portions are fixed in drive directions D1, D2 of the plate 3 substantially orthogonal to and coplanar with the sensor 5.
The actuators 7a and 7b are therefore motive respectively in the orthogonal drive directions D1 and D2 and the connection means 11 between the plate 3 and the actuators 7a and 7b allow a movement in the other directions.
The direction of an elementary movement dU of the finger between the points A and B on the trajectory t of the finger is determined based on the signals originating from the sensor 5.
The elementary movement dU of the finger is broken down into a component dX and a component dY on the two axes X and Y of the orthogonal coordinate system formed by the drive directions D1 and D2 of the actuators 7a and 7b.
The processing unit 9 modulates for example in a proportional manner the amplitude of the intensity of the control signals Sa and Sb of the actuators 7a, 7b as a function of the components dX and dY of the elementary movement dU (
In this example, periodic control signals, damped and in phase from the initial time t0 are applied to the two actuators 7a, 7b so as to generate an isolated haptic effect. An isolated haptic effect may be generated when, for example, the finger of the user changes selection in a drop-down command menu.
Then, for each moment of a predefined period of application Dt, the control signal Sa of the actuator 7a has an intensity of amplitude that is greater than for the control signal Sb of the actuator 7b, the component dY in the drive direction D1 of the actuator 7a being greater than the component dX in the drive direction D2 of the actuator 7b.
In other situations not represented, for which the elementary movement is substantially parallel to an axis X or Y, the control signals are modulated by the processing unit 9 so that the actuator capable of driving the plate in translation in the direction perpendicular to and coplanar with the elementary movement, has a virtually maximal intensity of amplitude.
At the same time, the other actuator, capable of driving the plate 3 in translation in a direction parallel to the elementary movement, then has a virtually zero intensity.
The resultant of the vibratory effect generated by the actuators 7a, 7b is then preferably felt by the finger in a direction of propagation dR (represented by a double arrow in
To make this clearer, shown in dotted lines and in an exaggerated manner are two positions 3′ and 3″, shifted by a few hundreds of micrometers, of the plate 3 in translation in the direction of propagation dR perpendicular to the trajectory t.
According to another embodiment shown in
In the same manner, the elementary movement dU of the finger is broken down into a component dX and a component dY on the two axes X and Y of the orthogonal coordinate system formed by the directions of movement D1 and D2 of the actuators 7a and 7b.
In this example, periodic control signals Sa, Sb, damped and in phase from the initial time t0 are applied to the two actuators 7a, 7b (
When the finger of the user is at the point A in the zone of movement (
The control signal Sa of the second actuator 7b then has a virtually maximal amplitude A2 while the first actuator 7a has a virtually zero amplitude A1 (
Then, when the finger of the user is at the point B in the zone of movement (
b illustrates in an exaggerated manner and in dotted lines the plates 3′ and 3″ moved in the radial direction of propagation dR of the haptic effect corresponding to the trajectory t travelled by the finger of the user, at the point B. It is noted that the moved plates 3′, 3″ are off-center relative to the center I of the plate 3 in the position of rest.
Finally, when the finger of the user is at the point C in the zone of movement (
The control signal Sa of the second actuator 7b then has a virtually zero amplitude A2 while the first actuator 7a has a virtually maximal amplitude A1 (
The resultant of the vibratory effect generated by the actuators 7a, 7b is then felt by the finger in a radial direction dR substantially perpendicular to the direction of elementary movement dU.
In this way it is possible to simulate a mechanical thumbwheel by a flat surface generating a haptic feedback in order, for example, to inform a user of a change of command or of the selection of a command in a drop-down menu, for example in order to inform the user of a change in temperature through a touch-sensitive haptic feedback.
In the first step 101, the direction of an elementary movement dU of the finger is determined and the elementary movement dU is broken down into components dX, dY in a first and a second drive direction D1, D2.
Then, in a second step 102, the first actuator 7a and the second actuator 7b are controlled independently as a function of the components dX, dY of said elementary movement dU.
A parameter of the control signals of the actuators 7a, 7b is modulated in proportion to the components dX, dY of the elementary movement dU of said finger.
For example, a parameter of the control signals of the actuators 7a, 7b is modulated as a function of the components dX, dY of the elementary movement dU so that the resultant of the vibratory effect generated by the actuators 7a, 7b is felt by the finger in a direction dR that is substantially perpendicular to the direction of the elementary movement dU.
Advantage is taken of the duration of application Dt of the signals S1 and S2 to reiterate the first step 101 for the determination of the next elementary movement dU.
Then, the steps 101, 102 are reiterated for the next elementary movement until the sensor 5 no longer detects any movement.
It is understood that, by generating a haptic feedback substantially perpendicular to the finger, the user perceives the haptic feedback irrespective of the operating frequencies.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 04132 | Jul 2008 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/059383 | 7/21/2009 | WO | 00 | 4/14/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/010098 | 1/28/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20020054060 | Schena | May 2002 | A1 |
20050017947 | Shahoian et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050052430 | Shahoian et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050184967 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050243072 | Denoue et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20080111788 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080303782 | Grant et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001855 | Lipton et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090007001 | Morin et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090322496 | da Costa | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013613 | Weston | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100325931 | Rosenberg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003-058321 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004-530200 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2008-546534 | Dec 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued in PCT/EP2009/059383, mailed on Oct. 19, 2009, with translation, 4 pages. |
Japanese Search Report issued in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2011-519151 dated Sep. 17, 2013, and English translation thereof (17 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110181404 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |