The invention relates to a method of hardening a sheet or strip made of an aluminum alloy of the 6xxx series and a sheet or strip produced thereby.
It is known from the prior art (cf. Ken Takata et Al., “Improvement of Strength-Elongation Balance of Al—Mg—Si Sheet Alloy by Utilising Mg—Si Clusters and Its Proposed Mechanism”, Materials Transactions (2017)) to improve elongation at break and tensile strength values in Al—Mg—Si aluminum alloys of the 6xxx series by subjecting the aluminum alloy to a substantially Mg—Si cluster-forming heat treatment after solution annealing and accelerated cooling (water quenching). This is carried out, for example, at a holding temperature of 100° C. (degrees Celsius) for a holding time of 24 days, which is a comparatively long process time, particularly with regard to industrial production.
With higher holding temperatures, the process time can be reduced, for example at 180° C. to 8 to 10 hours. Disadvantageously, at such higher holding temperatures, essentially β″ precipitates form, which means that the combination of elongation at break and tensile strength values known from heat treatments with reduced holding temperatures cannot be achieved.
The invention has therefore set itself the object of improving a method of the type described at the outset in such a way that the process time for hardening with heat treatment at comparatively low holding temperatures can be reduced while maintaining virtually the same elongation at break and tensile strength values.
Since the heat treatment comprises a second holding at a second holding temperature in the range of 150 to 250° C. during a second holding time as well as a subsequent second accelerated cooling, it can initially be expected that—as is known for heat treatments at higher holding temperatures—process times are reduced on the one hand, but on the other hand a worse combination of elongation at break and tensile strength values results due to β″ precipitations.
However, the latter can be specifically avoided by the provision for interrupting the first holding, since the second holding with subsequent second accelerated cooling interrupts the first holding several times and thereby divides this first holding into holding stages, each at a first holding temperature in the range of 60 to 140° C. and during a first holding time section lasting longer than the second holding time.
With the aid of the interrupting second holding in conjunction with the second accelerated cooling, a comparatively high number of additional vacancies can be generated and quenched in the 6xxx alloy, which supports Mg—Si cluster formation during the subsequent first holding and thus significantly reduces the process time of hardening under first holding.
According to the invention, therefore, those elongation at break and tensile strength values can be achieved significantly faster for 6xxx aluminum alloys (i.e. AlMgSi alloys of the 6000 series) which are known to be achieved during hardening with a formation of essentially Mg—Si clusters under comparatively long process times.
In general, it is mentioned that accelerated cooling can be understood as a faster cooling than cooling at room temperature and still air (cf. Friedrich Ostermann, Anwendungstechnologie Aluminium (Application Technology Aluminum), 3rd edition, year of publication 2014: Cooling after solution annealing).
Preferably, the first holding temperature is in the range of 80 to 120° C. in order to still be able to ensure a comparatively high Mg—Si cluster formation in the 6xxx aluminum alloy at shorter first holding time intervals. The above can be further improved by a first holding temperature in the range of 90 to 110° C.
The first holding time stages are preferably less than or equal to 12 hours in order to utilize substantially all of the quenched vacancies to form Mg—Si clusters. Preferably, the first holding time periods are in the range of 2 to 8 hours to thereby utilize a sufficient number of quenched vacancies to form Mg—Si clusters. The above can be further improved by first holding time sections in the range of 3 to 6 hours.
If the second holding temperature is in the range of 170 to 230° C., a temperature range can be specified in which a high number of vacancies can be advantageously produced, taking into account a comparatively short second holding time with reduced tendency to β″ precipitations. The above can be further improved by a second holding temperature in the range of 190 to 210° C.
Preferably, the second holding time of the second holding is less than or equal to 15 minutes in order to provide sufficient vacancies with low precipitation tendency in the 6xxx alloy.
The method for hardening the 6xxx alloy can be further improved if the second holding time (h2) in seconds at average crystal grain size (KG), measured by the line intersection method ASTM E112, in microns and at second holding temperature (T2) in degrees Celsius satisfies the following conditions:
Since the average crystal grain size (KG) does not change substantially after the first accelerated cooling, this average crystal grain size can be measured at any time after the first accelerated cooling. For example, the average crystal grain size (KG) may be after the first accelerated cooling and before the first or second holding.
Preferably, the first holding temperatures are the same throughout the first holding. Preferably, multiple or all first holding time stages are the same. Preferably, the multiple second holding at a second holding temperature during a second holding time is the same. Preferably, the first holding time stage of the first holding time stages lasts longer than the subsequent first holding time stages.
In particular, the first and/or second accelerated cooling is carried out at a cooling rate of at least 20° C./s, in particular of at least 50° C./s, preferably of at least 80° C./s, so as to be able to reliably quench the vacancies formed during the second holding.
Preferably, heating from the first holding to the second holding occurs at a heating rate of at least 10° C./s, in particular at least 50° C./s.
Preferably, the 6xxx aluminum alloy has from 0.2 to 1.5 wt. % magnesium (Mg) and from 0.2 to 1.5 wt. % silicon (Si) —which can result in a large precipitation pressure for the formation of Mg—Si clusters during the first holding and an increased vacancy density during the second holding.
Optionally, the 6xxx aluminum alloy may contain one or more elements: up to 1.1 wt. % copper (Cu) and/or up to 0.7 wt. % iron (Fe) and/or up to 1.0 wt. % manganese (Mn) and/or up to 0.35 wt.-% chromium (Cr) and/or up to 0.25 wt. % zinc (Zn) and/or up to 0.15 wt. % titanium (Ti) and/or up to 0.1 wt. % vanadium (V) and/or up to 0.2 wt. % zirconium (Zr) and/or up to 0.2 wt. % tin (Sn).
The remainder of the aluminum alloy comprises aluminum and unavoidable impurities due to the manufacturing process, each in an amount of not more than 0.05 wt. % and in total not more than 0.15 wt. %.
In addition, the aluminum alloy may have from 0.2 to 1.2 wt. % magnesium (Mg) to further increase the formation of Mg—Si clusters.
Preferably, the aluminum alloy is of type AA6005, AA6016, AA6061, AA6063 or AA6082.
Preferably, the sheet or strip has a thickness of less than 5 mm, in particular 3 mm, in order to create a sufficient number of empty spaces with the brief interruption of the first holding and to prevent undesired precipitation.
Furthermore, the invention has set itself the object of creating a sheet or strip subjected to hardening with comparatively high elongation at break and tensile strength values.
By subjecting the sheet or strip to the hardening process according to the invention, a sufficiently high 0.2% yield strength Rp0,2>200 MPa and a sufficiently high elongation at break A of >20% can be achieved, this with substantially Mg—Si clusters in the aluminum matrix.
Preferably, the aluminum alloy has a cluster density of at least 2×1024 clusters/m3 with a Guinier radius >1 nm (nanometer) and with a median Guinier radius of >1.3 nm as measured by a LEAP 3000 HR type atom probe tomography (LEAP).
Preferably, the width of the precipitation-free zones at the grain boundaries is between 3 and 80 nm (nanometers) in order to limit a negative influence on the elongation values of the sheet or strip—even more so if the width of the precipitation-free zones at the grain boundaries is between 5 and 50 nm.
Preferably, the Mg- and Si-containing precipitates, in particular of the type Mg2Si, have an average size of 30 to 100 nm (nanometers) at the grain boundaries in order to be able to ensure sufficient strength at high elongation values—this in particular if the precipitates have an average size of 50 to 70 nm at the grain boundaries.
To demonstrate the effects obtained, rolled semi-finished products, namely sheets A, B and C formed as thin sheets, each with a sheet thickness of 1.7 mm (millimeters) and an AA6016 aluminum alloy with
These sheets A, B and C are subjected to different methods V1, V2, V3 for hardening. These methods V1, V2, V3 all have other heat treatments that follow a solution annealing at 540° C. (degrees Celsius) for 2 min (minutes) and a subsequent first accelerated cooling (namely water quenching).
This method is known from the prior art, in which a thin sheet A, following the solution annealing and the first accelerated cooling, is subjected to a single-stage heat treatment. This single-stage heat treatment consists of a first holding with a first holding temperature (T1) at 100° C. and a first holding time (h1) of 7 days.
In contrast to method V1, the heat treatments of methods V2, V3 according to the invention are multi-stage—as can be seen in
This multi-stage is formed under a fourfold interruption of a first holding by a second holding together with a second accelerated cooling. As a result, the first holding is divided into holding stages.
On the one hand, these holding stages differ from one another in the first holding time sections h1a or h1b, h1c, h1d, h1e, and on the other hand they are identical in the first holding temperature T1, although the latter need not necessarily be the case. Each holding stage can have its individual holding temperature T1 during the individual first holding time section h1a, h1b, h1c, h1d or h1e. The first holding temperature T1 or first holding temperatures T1 of the first holding time sections h1a, h1b, h1c, h1d, h1e need only satisfy the condition of 60 to 140° C.
Thin sheet B was then subjected to multi-stage heat treatment in the following sequence after solution annealing and initial accelerated cooling:
Furthermore, it can be seen in
Method V3 differs from method V2 exclusively in point c, in that the second holding is carried out at a second holding temperature T2 at 205° C. during a second holding time h2 of 45 seconds. This holding time also satisfies at a grain size KG of 50 μm the condition 28.82 seconds≤h2≤101.60 seconds.
The sheets A, B, C subjected to the methods V1, V2 and V3 for hardening were investigated by means of tensile tests with respect to their mechanical properties 0.2% proof stress Rp0,2, tensile strength Rm, uniform elongation Ag and elongation at break A.
As can be seen from Table 1, sheets B, C achieve almost identical mechanical properties with significantly reduced hardening process times—as is the case with sheet A and can also be seen in
In particular, compared with sheet A, sheet C even exhibits improved mechanical properties at the 0.2% proof stress, which are known to be achievable for sheet A only with an extremely long process time of 7 days.
Thus, a metallurgical examination of sheet B and C yielded the following results:
Width of the precipitate-free zones at the grain boundaries 69 nm.
Mean size of Mg2Si-type precipitates at grain boundaries 70 nm.
Width of the precipitation-free zones at the grain boundaries 31 nm.
Mean size of Mg2Si-type precipitates at grain boundaries 56 nm.
Cluster density of 2.55×1024 clusters/m3 with a median Guinier radius of 1.7 nm.
Compared to sheet B, sheet C exhibits both a small average size of precipitates and a smaller width of precipitate-free zones, which explains the increased strength values at higher strain values according to Table 1.
According to the invention, therefore, by means of methods V2 and V3, a significantly faster method for hardening 6xxx aluminum alloys can be created, with which outstanding elongation at break and tensile strength values can also be achieved due to the hardening of the aluminum alloy with the formation of essentially Mg—Si clusters.
In particular, at a lower second holding temperature (T2 at 205° C.) of method V3 compared to method V2, a significant improvement towards an optimum can be recognized, which lies in the range of 190 to 210° C.
In general, it is noted that “in particular” can be translated into English as “more particularly”. A feature preceded by “in particular” is to be regarded as an optional feature which may be omitted and thus does not constitute a limitation, for example of the claims. The same applies to “vorzugsweise”, translated into English as “preferably”.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20176943.7 | May 2020 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2021/064291 | 5/27/2021 | WO |