1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to high resolution photography. More specifically, the invention relates to capturing a photographic image using an angularly displaced image sensing array.
2. Background
Standard photography has existed for decades. A lens or series of lenses focuses light onto a light-sensitive emulsion when a shutter opens. The lens is focused on a plane at some distance from the camera and captures in acceptable focus those things in that plane and some distance in either direction from the plane. That area in which an acceptably focused image may be captured is the depth of field. The depth of field dictates the focus of more distant features of the object photographed as well as its surroundings. A standard photograph is a planar representation of a focal plane from the perspective of the camera.
Various techniques for capturing digital images have proliferated. Digital photography is becoming increasingly mainstream. Relatively high resolution pictures may be captured using existing megapixel cameras which are widely commercially available. One advantage of digital images is the ability to manipulate them on computer. In particular, the ability to zoom in to see fine detail in the image. The general depth of field of existing digital cameras, as well as the resolution, causes the image to break down relatively rapidly on successive zooms.
The invention is illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements. It should be noted that references to “an” or “one” embodiment in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references mean at least one.
The optics of capture device 10 are assumed to have a depth of field “d” at a given distance. Depth of field tends to increase with distance from the capture device. As previously indicated, depth of field is the range of distance over which the acceptable focus can be achieved without varying the lens arrangement. As used herein, depth refers to distance from a reference to a point on the surface of the target (rather than, for example, thickness of the material of the target itself). For one embodiment, acceptable focus is defined to be where the defocusing blur is less than one pixel width. A target 12 which has a surface relief greater than d cannot be fully focused in a single pass. As used herein, a target may be one or more objects or an environment. Accordingly, the capture device 10 establishes a first focal distance r to, for example, bring the leading edge 34 of a target into focus. Given the depth of field d, all points within zone 14 are in focus during a first pass. However, portions of the target 12 outside of zone 14, such as surface 36 and surface 38, will be out of focus. On subsequent passes the focal distances r′ and r″ are established to bring zones 16 and 18 into focus and thereby achieve focus of surfaces 36 and 38. After three passes, three images of target object 12 have been captured. Those images may then be composited either within the capture device or on a host (not shown), such that only those points within the photograph that are in the best focus of the three images are selected for the composite picture. In some embodiments, the images may be used to create a composite texture map for a three-dimensional model of the target. Accordingly, as used herein, “image” may include all or a portion of a texture map. In one embodiment, the best focus may be determined by processing the image in the frequency domain. Sharpness of feature edges is greater and therefore focus is greater where the rate of change of data between adjacent pixels is the greatest. This is reflected as peaks in the frequency domain. In alternate embodiments, three dimensional data about the object may be used to select pixels from the various images captured. In either case, a full focus of surfaces 34, 36 and 38 can be achieved in the composite photograph. While three passes are described, the disclosed techniques may be generalized to N passes where N is an arbitrarily large number.
Because the capture device operates based on angular displacement, a planar assumption must be imposed to yield a standard photograph. Those points off the perpendicular from the capture device 10 to the target 12 will need to be scaled to compensate for the greater distance. Additionally, the angular displacement will be shorter at the edges of the arc and longer closer to the perpendicular in view of the fact that it is desirable to have the same linear displacement S between respective captures regardless of where on the plane the capture is to occur. As shown, the angular displacement between the two captures defining area 20 is less than the angular displacement between the two captures defining area 22, while the linear displacement between the two captures on the photo plane remains S.
It is within the scope and contemplation of the invention to adjust the angular velocity while maintaining a constant capture rate or adjust the capture rate while maintaining a constant angular velocity to effect the consistent linear displacement between captures. It is also within the scope and contemplation of the invention to dynamically change the angular displacement between captures during scanning based on data capture or known characteristics of the target. For example, for target 12 the importance of close displacements between captures on surface 34 at the focal distance for zone 36 is negligible assuming the surface is homogeneous.
In another embodiment of the invention, the capture device 10 automatically changes the focal distance between displacements to compensate for distance from a reference position. For example, the focal distance for the captures defining area 20 would be longer than the focal distances defining area 22. In this manner, the capture 10 device may impose a focal plane on the image where without the capture device 10 this changing focal distance would typically have a focal cylinder resulting from the angular displacements. The plane need not be imposed perpendicular to the capture device 10 and other capture patterns such as to more closely match a surface relief of the target 12 are within the scope and contemplation of the invention.
In one embodiment, before beginning actual image capture, the image capture device 10 performs a rough scan to discern the number of passes of capture required to achieve a full focus end photograph. In another embodiment, the capture device 10 begins capturing at a preestablished focal distance and iteratively captures subsequent depths of field until a prescribed number of passes have occurred. In still another embodiment, the system infers from data captured and dynamically determines what additional depths should be captured.
In one embodiment, the capture device 10 captures a texture map of a facing surface the target 12 through one or more passes. As used herein, “facing surface” is deemed to mean the surface of the target object visible from the point of view of the capture device assuming an infinite field of view. In some embodiments, the target object may be repositioned relative to the capture device by, for example, a turntable. In one embodiment, the capture occurs while the object is illuminated by non-coherent broad spectrum illumination, such that no laser is required for the capture.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes can be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3636250 | Haeff | Jan 1972 | A |
4089608 | Hoadley | May 1978 | A |
4404594 | Hannan | Sep 1983 | A |
4564295 | Halioua | Jan 1986 | A |
4590608 | Chen et al. | May 1986 | A |
4641972 | Halioua et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4657394 | Halioua | Apr 1987 | A |
4705401 | Addleman et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4724525 | Purcell et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4737032 | Addleman et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4802759 | Matsumoto et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4846577 | Grindon | Jul 1989 | A |
5067817 | Glenn | Nov 1991 | A |
5131844 | Marinaccio et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5132839 | Travis | Jul 1992 | A |
5135309 | Kuchel et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5148502 | Tsujiuchi et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5175601 | Fitts et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5216817 | Misevich et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5218427 | Koch | Jun 1993 | A |
5231470 | Koch | Jul 1993 | A |
5282045 | Mimura et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5285397 | Heier et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5289264 | Steinbichler | Feb 1994 | A |
5307292 | Brown et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5315512 | Roth | May 1994 | A |
5335317 | Yamashita et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5337149 | Kozah et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5377011 | Koch | Dec 1994 | A |
5414647 | Ebenstein et al. | May 1995 | A |
5432622 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5453784 | Krishnan et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5471303 | Ai et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5531520 | Grimson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5559334 | Gupta et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5592563 | Zahavi | Jan 1997 | A |
5611147 | Raab | Mar 1997 | A |
5617645 | Wick et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627771 | Makino | May 1997 | A |
5636025 | Bieman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5646733 | Bieman | Jul 1997 | A |
5659804 | Keller | Aug 1997 | A |
5661667 | Rueb et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5678546 | Truppe | Oct 1997 | A |
5689446 | Sundman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5701173 | Rioux | Dec 1997 | A |
5704897 | Truppe | Jan 1998 | A |
5708498 | Rioux et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5745175 | Anderson | Apr 1998 | A |
5747822 | Sinclair et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748194 | Chen | May 1998 | A |
5771310 | Vannah | Jun 1998 | A |
5794356 | Raab | Aug 1998 | A |
5805289 | Corby, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5864640 | Miramonit et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870220 | Migdal et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880846 | Hasman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5907359 | Watanabe | May 1999 | A |
5910845 | Brown | Jun 1999 | A |
5944598 | Tong et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946645 | Rioux et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5978102 | Matsuda | Nov 1999 | A |
5988862 | Kacyra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995650 | Migdal et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999641 | Miller et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016487 | Rioux et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6037584 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057909 | Yahav et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078701 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091905 | Yahav et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100517 | Yahav et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111582 | Jenkins | Aug 2000 | A |
6115146 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137896 | Chang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157747 | Szeliski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6192393 | Tarantino et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6233014 | Ochi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6535250 | Okisu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6721465 | Nakashima et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7058213 | Rubbert et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068836 | Rubbert et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4134546 | Aug 1993 | DE |
WO 0109836 | Feb 2001 | WO |