Patent Grant
8009330
The present invention relates to flexography printing and more specifically to methods and apparatus for reducing waste during the imaging and mounting of flexographic printing plates.
Flexographic printing plates are relatively expensive compared to other types of plates such as those used in offset printing; therefore, flexographic printers will only use the appropriate amount of plate material necessary to transfer a graphic image. The graphic image is subsequently transferred to a substrate such as film, paper, or board, etc. Printers reduce the cost of printing when using flexographic plate material, by not using flexographic material where no graphic elements exist.
Corrugated printing is a segment of the industry wherein this practice is common. To keep manufacturing costs as low as possible, the corrugated printer will manually prepare the electronic art in a manner that maximizes material savings, while minimizing the labor cost associated with manually mounting the plates for printing.
This method is accomplished by breaking an electronic art file into smaller pieces called “slugs.” The slugs are then arranged using a software application such as the Kodak TIFF Assembler Plus, to produce an arranged “slugs file.” The arranged slugs file is imaged (or engraved) using a specially designed flexographic imaging device and software, to produce a flexographic plate. The flexographic plate is then cut into smaller plates called “slug plates.” Each “slug plate” represents a slug. The slugs plates are then mounted for printing. The process to prepare a job using this method is described in more detail below.
During the job estimation and quotation phase of the workflow, a job planner or estimator will use an inkjet proof to evaluate which graphic elements are in close proximity to other graphic elements and can therefore grouped together onto a single slug plate. During this process, the planner or estimator is also evaluates the additional labor cost that will be incurred during the plate mounting process by breaking the file and flexographic plate into smaller pieces. Therefore, the quotation for the job reflects the optimal savings in plate material when labor to mount the plates for printing is included.
Following acceptance of the quote, a prepress operator will reference the “marked up” inkjet proof that was used during the quotation process to manually add and position registration marks in and around the elements that will make up individual slug plates. The registration marks aid in re-assembling the artwork during the plate mounting process.
The prepress operator will then output a “mounting die” which is comprised of a CAD-CAM drawing of the container (or package) shape, along with the corresponding registration marks that were placed into the electronic art file. The mounting die is typically a piece of Mylar or film that is manually positioned on an optical/video plate mounting device or pin registration mounting device. The mounting die is used as a guide to properly position the individual slug plates on a “carrier sheet.”
Following output of the mounting die, the electronic art is output to a TIFF bitmap format and checked for accuracy. Following approval, the composite file is then broken into individual slug files for imaging. This is accomplished by breaking an electronic art file into smaller pieces called slugs, and the slug plates are arranged using a software application such as the Kodak TIFF Assembler Plus, and the resulting output file is imaged to a flexographic plate. The flexographic printing plate, using current technologies is imaged (or engraved) using a specially designed flexographic imaging device and software.
After the plates have been processed via solvent or thermal processing to create a relief image, dried, and cut to size, the slug plates are manually positioned on a “carrier or mount” using double sided sticky back tape and edge sealant. After each plate has been mounted and the edge sealed, ink is applied manually using a rubber roller and an impression of the mounted plates is made on the “mounting die.” This process creates a “mounters proof” or actual representation of what will be printed on press. The “carriers or mounts” are then used in a corrugated printing press to produce the finished container or point of purchase display.
Although the current workflow described above has numerous benefits, it also has two major deficiencies. Because the original composite file or film was broken into smaller pieces, correction cycles are not easily accommodated because the composite file is no longer available for reference (for position) when placing new graphics or re-mounting worn individual slug plates. Also, there is no ability to save the job estimate information as a template to be used during production. Thus eliminating subjective decision, which will ensure that job costs are in alignment with the estimate/quote that is made at the beginning of the workflow.
In the process, prior art determining of the optimum number of slug plates versus the labor costs to mount the job is subjective. There is no embedded pricing information or analysis available to assist in the process, i.e. real time cost analysis as the work is performed.
A prior art method is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,954,291 (Klein et al.). Klein et al. discloses reading a previously prepared output ready file such as TIFF bitmap, and automatically scanning for slug plates. The scanned slug plates are cut and pasted into a new file while minimizing the possible waste in the created new file. U.S. Pat. No. 6,954,291 does not suggest any embedded cost calculation to be reflected by the chosen geometry of the new file.
Briefly, according to one aspect of the present invention a method for reducing waste in imaging of flexographic plates comprises the steps of: receiving an electronic art file; displaying the file on a computer display; selecting a set of polygonal areas from the displayed file in response to cost calculation associated with the selection of the set of polygonal areas; automatically offering alternative polygonal areas based on automatic cost calculation analysis based on the selection of the polygonal areas; ganging the polygonal areas into a compacted slugs file; imaging the compacted slugs file on a flexographic imaging device to produce compacted flexographic plate; cutting the compacted flexographic plate according to the selection the polygonal areas into independent flexographic slug plate pieces; and mounting the flexographic slug plate pieces on a carrier while matching the original structure of the electronic art file.
These and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the drawings wherein there is shown and described an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
The present invention describes methods of selecting scenarios for reducing flexographic plate waste, while calculating the cost associated with a selected scenario. This invention will help in reducing labor cost as well as material waste in the process of flexographic plate production.
Referring to
At each event that the user selects a new independent slug 11 or alters the slug selection, the cost calculator 14 will automatically calculate and display the computed cost results, to reflect changes made by the user.
The input data for the cost calculation includes:
The cost configuration setup 13 includes among other parameters: fully loaded cost per square inch or mm for plates, fully loaded cost per square inch to manufacture each carrier, and fully loaded costs “per mount” to position and edge sealed slug plates. Thus, the invention helps the user reach the most cost effective slugs selection that is optimized to his or her specific needs, taking into account parameters such as plate cost, cost of labor, and other relevant cost related parameters.
In another embodiment of this invention, after a selection of slug plates is made by the user, automatic analysis is done to look for adjacent selected slug plates areas. The results of such analysis will be an automatic suggestion of possible combinations of adjacent areas to form a new set of slug plates, provided that the instant cost calculator 14 found that the new set of slug plates will be less expensive to produce.
In order to better the invention, reference is made to
After the plate exposure and development processes, the user can choose to use a plate cutting device (such as from exact-technology) in order to cut the compacted slug plate 209 into separate slug plates 210. Previously generated cutting instruction file will be supplied to the cutting device and it will start the automatic plate cutting process. The user may also choose to cut the compacted slug plate 209 manually into a plurality of slug plates 210, as illustrated in
Printing sites often tend to execute similar jobs from time to time. This is usually apparent when specific customers order same or similar jobs, such as a popular product package. The ability to reuse a previous definition of a job will save work time and prevent new mistakes and the need to define the same job again and again. Therefore, previously designed and saved jobs 212, can be recalled to be modified and/or reused in the future.
A job setup process 200 is performed to setup general parameters such as typical site cost scheme in a form of a cost file. In addition, parameters such in minimal margins and marks are entered. Usually these parameters are modified frequently, not per every slug plate job.
The steps of a new job flow 201 will be described hereunder. A digital plate file 202 typically a TIFF bitmap file comprising plurality of plate pieces is displayed. As part of job planning 31, the user draws 203 certain slugs e.g. 11 and/or 12 to represent desired plate pieces to be generated. A cost calculation 204 is made to represent the slugs drawing. The user might decide to draw more slugs 205, in this case steps 203 and 204 are redone. At the stage the user finishes steps 203 and 204, an automatic step 206 for calculating a better slug plate option that might be more cost effective, may be performed by the software. At this stage the job planning 31 is completed, resulting in two outcomes:
The next step is to compress the previously selected slugs resulted from job planning 31 into a better optimized layout geometry, resulting in compacted slugs area 208.
The compacted slugs 208 are imaged to produce compact slug plate 209. Slug plates are cut from the previously imaged compacted slug plate 209 into independent slug plate pieces 210.
Reference is made to
Another embodiment of the present invention incorporates a reused job plan flow 202. A previously prepared job is opened and a required modification are made. At this stage the flow continues from steps 203 to 211 as has been described for the new job flow 201.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the scope of the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6954291 | Klein et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 7717040 | Shishkin | May 2010 | B2 |
| 20030076538 | Whittingham et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 435 291 | Jul 2004 | EP |
| 1 543 966 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090195837 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |
