The present invention addresses imaging of nonlinear scattering with elastic and electromagnetic waves and combinations of these. It has applications both in medical and technical fields.
Material properties for both electromagnetic (EM) and elastic (EL) waves often show nonlinear properties where the material parameters depend on the amplitude of the field variables of the waves. Spatial variation in nonlinear material properties provide nonlinear scattering of both EM and EL waves, and imaging of such nonlinear scattering sources are in many situations useful to identify material properties. Both the forward wave propagation and local scattering of both EM and EL waves have mathematical similarities, and methods and instrumentation for imaging therefore have similar structures. Examples of uses of EL waves are material testing both with shear waves and compression waves, ultrasound medical imaging with compression waves, and SONAR sub-sea and geological measurements. EM waves have similar uses, where particularly new developments of EM technology in the high GHz and the THz range with wave lengths in the 0.1-1 mm range are being developed for medical imaging providing added information to the ultrasound images. EM imaging in the infra-red and optical frequency ranges also provides useful information both for material testing and medical imaging.
The nonlinear scattering can for both EM and EL waves be separated into a parametric and a resonant scattering type. For EL waves, the parametric scattering originates from a nonlinear variation of the local elasticity parameters with the amplitude of the local elastic wave field, where spatial variations of the nonlinear variation produce the nonlinear scattering. For EM waves, the parametric scattering originates from a nonlinear variation of the local dielectric constant or magnetic permeability with the amplitude of the local EM wave field, where spatial variations of the nonlinear variation produce the nonlinear scattering. With elastic compression waves, referred to as acoustic waves, one for example gets strong nonlinear parametric scattering at the interface between soft materials and hard materials, for example as found with ultrasound nonlinear scattering from micro calcifications in soft tumor tissue, or acoustic scattering from hard objects in soil like mines or other objects. One also gets strong nonlinear scattering at the interface between harder materials and much softer materials, for example as found with ultrasound scattering from gas micro-bubbles in blood or gas filled swim-bladders of fish and the like in water, or acoustic scattering from cracks in for example polymers, polymer composites, rocks or metal parts.
With a single frequency band incident wave, the parametric nonlinear scattering produces harmonic components of the incident frequency band in the scattered wave. With dual band incident waves that interact locally, the parametric nonlinear scattering produces bands around convolutions of the incident frequency bands, which provide bands around sums and differences of the incident frequencies. However, the nonlinear variation of the material parameters also produces an accumulative nonlinear distortion of the forward propagating wave. When the pulse length of the high frequency pulse increases above approximately a half period of the low frequency pulse, the linear scattering from the nonlinear forward propagation distortion has a similar signature to the local nonlinear scattering, and it is in this case difficult to distinguish the signal components that occur from linear scattering of the nonlinear forward propagation distortion of the incident wave, and the signal components that occur from local nonlinear scattering. The present invention presents solutions in the form of methods and instrumentation that suppresses the components that originate from strong linear scattering of components produced by nonlinear forward propagation distortion and extracts the local nonlinear scattering components to produce a spatial imaging of the local nonlinear scattering sources.
Resonant nonlinear scattering has a time lag involved, which in some situations can be used to separate signal components from local nonlinear scattering and forward propagation distortion of the incident waves. However, the current invention provides further advantages for imaging of local resonant nonlinear scattering sources.
For acoustic waves, gas micro-bubbles show resonant scattering, for example, where the resonance originates from the energy exchange between the nonlinear elasticity of the bubble with shell and gas, and a co-oscillating fluid mass around the bubble with a volume approximately 3 times the bubble volume. As both the elasticity and the mass vary with bubble compression, the resonance frequency is nonlinearly affected by the incident acoustic wave field, producing a particularly strong nonlinear scattering with a large amount of harmonic components of the incident frequency (n-times the incident frequency) and even sub-harmonic components of the incident frequency (a fraction of the incident frequency) in the scattered field, and supra-harmonic components (bands around the harmonic components) of the incident frequency. However, for imaging at frequencies well above the bubble resonance frequency, the nonlinear scattering is much lower, and the present invention provides solutions for enhanced imaging of micro-bubbles at frequencies above the resonance frequency.
Micro-calcifications can also produce resonant scattering of an acoustic wave at low frequencies, where the calcium particle that is heavier than the surrounding tissue interacts with the shear elasticity of the surrounding tissue to produce a low resonance frequency. The dual frequency solution of this invention, where the frequency of the manipulation wave is low, can excite this resonance when the calcium particles are small.
Resonant nonlinear EM scattering originates in the interaction between the wave field and the atoms and molecules, which is best described within the realm of quantum physics. Examples of EM resonant scattering are fluorescence which has similarities to sub-harmonic acoustic scattering. Two-photon quantum scattering is similar to 2nd harmonic parametric scattering, but includes detailed dynamics with time lags in the process.
There is also found a nonlinear interaction between EM and EL waves in materials, where for example EL compression waves change the EM material parameters in the process called the acousto-optic effect. Absorption of EM waves in materials produces a radiation force and local heating of the material that generates acoustic waves in a process called the photo-acoustic effect. The invention hence addresses both EM and EL waves, and combinations of these, where the waves referred to in the description and claims can be EM and/or EL waves.
This summary gives a brief overview of components of the invention and does not present any limitations as to the extent of the invention, where the invention is solely defined by the claims appended hereto.
The invention operates with both acoustic and electromagnetic arrays, and combinations of these, for example with the photo-acoustic principle. The general principle of the invention is described using acoustic waves as an example, where the transition to electromagnetic waves can be done by anyone skilled in the art.
1st and a 2nd pulsed waves are transmitted in at least one transmit event along 1st and 2nd transmit beams in skewed or opposite directions into an object, where the 1st and 2nd transmitted pulses overlap in space and time in a nonlinear interaction overlap region of the object at an angle θ between the forward propagation directions of the beams where θ is any angle in the interval of 160-200 deg. For objects where the parameters for wave scattering and propagation depends on the amplitude of the wave-field, one obtains nonlinear interaction scattering sources in the overlap region, with frequency components that are sums and differences of the frequency components of the 1st and 2nd pulsed waves. The nonlinear interaction scattered components are picked up by a receive array, that can be one of the transmit arrays, or a separate array, and through processing one can separate the nonlinear interaction scattered components from other receive components either through i) filtering in the time domain, or ii) through pulse inversion techniques where one transmits two events of 1st and 2nd pulsed waves with differences in the polarity, amplitude, or frequency of one of the 1st and 2nd pulsed waves and combining the receive signals from both transmit events, or iii) a combination of filtering and pulse inversion.
For opposite propagating 1st and 2nd transmit waves, the depth location of the overlap region is determined by the relative timing of the transmit of the 1st and 2nd pulsed waves. The length of the overlap region is determined by the length of the pulses, where one generally would choose a short pulse of one of the transmit pulses (sensing pulse) for good spatial image resolution, and the other pulse (manipulation pulse) can be relatively long to determine the length of the overlap region. However, the strength of the nonlinear interaction scanning increases with the amplitude of the two transmitted pulses, and with longer pulses absorption heating of the transducer array and object limits the pulse amplitude, hence reducing the strength of the nonlinear interaction scanning. It is in this situation an advantage to use as low frequency of say the 1st pulse (manipulation pulse) as possible given allowable aperture dimensions and beam diffraction broadening with depth, while the other pulse has high frequency for strong scattering and spatial resolution. The current invention presents solutions for such a system.
The invention also claims an instrument that operates according to the methods. The instrument and methods can operate with different types of arrays, for example at least two linear or phased arrays, or a ring array, all known in the art.
We will here give examples of embodiments according to the invention. The description does not present any limitations as to the extent of the invention, where the invention is solely defined by the claims appended hereto.
We use acoustic pressure waves in an object with 2nd order elasticity as an example for description of the invention. It will however be clear to anyone skilled in the art how this example can be extended to more complex elasticity situations, for example the situation of resonant nonlinear scatterers, the use of acoustic shear waves, acoustic plate waves, acoustic surface waves, sand also electromagnetic waves. Cracks in polymers, polymer composites, or rocks, provide especially strong nonlinear scattering. Methods according to the current invention can for example be used to detect cracks in rocks to assess stability of formations, problems with inflow of water in tunnels, and also assessment of the neighborhood of oil and gas wells. For plates of polymer or polymer composites in constructions in for example airplanes, vessels or windmills, one can for example use the methods of detecting nonlinear interaction scattering according to this invention to detect cracks or other damages in the material both as quality control in manufacturing, and for surveillance of safe operation of constructions. For plates one can conveniently use surface, or plate mode elastic waves, or pressure waves, or a combination of these.
For the illustrative example of pressure waves, the volume compression δV of a small volume element ΔV by a pressure p, can to the 2nd order in the pressure be written as δV/ΔV=−∇ψ=(1−βnκp)κp, where ψ is the particle displacement in the wave, κ is the linear compressibility, and βn is a nonlinearity parameter. With this nonlinear elasticity we get a wave equation that includes nonlinear forward propagation and scattering phenomena as
where r is the space coordinate vector, t is time, φ(r,t) is the acoustic impulse momentum field defined through ρ(r)u(r,t)=−∇φ(r,t) where u(r,t)=∂ψ(r,t)/∂t is the acoustic particle velocity, ρ(r) is the object mass density, and p(r,t)=∂φ(r,t)/∂t is the acoustic pressure field. c0(r) is the linear wave propagation velocity for low field amplitudes, βp(r)=βn(r)κ(r) is a nonlinear propagation parameter, hp(r,t) is a convolution kernel that represents absorption of wave energy to heat. σl(r) and γ(r) are the relative rapid (on a scale<approximately the wave length) spatial variations of the compressibility and mass density of the object that gives linear scattering parameters, and σn(r) is a nonlinear scattering parameter. The left side propagation parameters vary with r on a scale>approximately the wavelength, while the right side scattering parameters vary with r on a scale<approximately the wave length. A similar equation for electromagnetic waves can be formulated that represents similar nonlinear propagation and scattering phenomena for the EM waves.
The different terms of Eq. (2) have different effects on the wave propagation and scattering: The linear propagation terms (1) guide the linear forward propagation of the incident wave without producing new frequency components. The linear scattering source terms (4) produce local scattering of the forward propagating wave without producing new frequency components in the scattered wave. More detailed analysis shows that the nonlinear propagation term (2) modifies the propagation velocity through a combination of term (1+2) as
where we in the last approximation have used that |2βp(r)p1(r,t)|=|x|<<1 which allows the approximation √{square root over (1−2x)}≈1−x. The nonlinear variation of the propagation velocity with the pressure p in Eq. (2) arises from that a high positive pressure makes the material stiffer with a corresponding increase in propagation velocity, while a high negative pressure makes the material softer with a corresponding decrease in propagation velocity. This produces a forward propagation distortion of the wave, well known in nonlinear wave propagation. The propagation time t(r1,r2) of a field point at (r1,t1) of the wave to (r2,t2) is in the geometric ray propagation approximation given as
where Γ(r1,r2) is the geometric ray propagation path from r1 to r2, p(s) is the wave pressure at the field point as a function of propagation, t0(r1,r2) is the propagation time in the low amplitude linear regime, and τ(r1,r2) is the nonlinear modification of the propagation time which we denote the nonlinear propagation delay.
Hence, for materials with adequately high nonlinearity in the material parameters relative to the wave field amplitude, the nonlinearity affects both the propagation velocity and local scattering of the wave. A slowly varying (close to constant on a scale>˜wave length) of the nonlinear material parameters will provide a nonlinear forward propagation distortion of the incident waves that accumulates/increases in magnitude with propagation distance through term (2) of Eq. (1). A rapid oscillation (on a scale<˜wavelength) of the nonlinear material parameters produces a local nonlinear scattering of the incident waves through term (5) of Eq. (1).
The nonlinear propagation (2) and scattering (5) phenomena are in the 2nd order approximation of material parameters are both proportional to 2p{umlaut over (φ)}=2p{dot over (p)}=∂p2p2/∂t. For a wave that is a sum of two components p=p1+p2 as in our example, the nonlinear propagation and scattering are both given by
A multiplication of two functions in the temporal domain produces a convolution of the functions temporal Fourier transforms (i.e. temporal frequency spectra) in the temporal frequency domain. This convolution introduces frequency components in the product of the functions that are sums and differences of the frequency components of the factors of the multiplication. For the nonlinear self distortion terms, this produces harmonic and sub-harmonic components of the incident frequency bands.
The nonlinear scattering source term (5) in Eq. (1) is a monopole scattering term that fundamentally scatters equally in all directions from sources smaller than a wavelength of the incident waves. Interference between neighboring scatterers and scatterers much larger than the wave length will however produce a direction dependent scattering. In this example the scattered signal is received with the array 102, while in
In this example both pulsed wave beams 103 and 104 are wide in the azimuth direction,
To transmit wide beams the array 101 could in principle be composed of a single transducer element, as receive resolution is obtained by the array 102. For simple electrical impedance matching to the transmitters to transmit high amplitudes, it is however convenient that the array is composed of several smaller elements. This also allows electronic focusing of the transmit pulse 103. Focusing of the transmit beams increases the transmitted pressure amplitudes p1 and p2, that increases the nonlinear scattering ˜p1p2 in a selected depth region, also prefer multi-element arrays for transmit, albeit one can also use lenses, all according to known methods. Focusing of the transmit beams require lateral azimuth scanning of the focused transmit beams for 2D or 3D imaging, according to known methods.
During a time interval Δt, both waves propagate a distance c Δt.
where θ is defined above and in the Figure. For θ→0 both pulses 103 and 104 get the same propagation direction and ΔT→∞, which implies that the phase between the peak of pulse 104 and the oscillation of 103 is constant along their common propagation direction, i.e. pulse 104 surfs on the pulse 103. The polarity of p(s) in Eq. (3) is then constant, and τ(z) in Eq. (3) represents an accumulative increase in magnitude of the nonlinear propagation delay of pulse 104 with depth, which must be accounted for in the signal processing. For θ=π/2 the pulse 103 propagates at right angle to the pulse direction of 104, and we get ΔT=T1, and for θ=π the pulse 103 propagates in the opposite direction of the pulse 104, and we get ΔT=T1/2.
For θ1<θ<2π−θ1 where 0<θ1<π/2 the pressure p(s) of the manipulation pulse 103 at the location of the sensing pulse 104, p(s) included in the integral for the nonlinear propagation delay τ in Eq. (3), will oscillate in polarity with a limited amplitude in the propagation of the pulses, and so will also τ. A typical value for βp˜2·10−9 Pa−1. For a peak pressure of the manipulation pulse of P=1 MPa the maximal value of r becomes from Eq. (3) for f1=0.5 MHz, T1=1/f1 and ω=2πf1
where we have chosen θ=(45, 90, 180) deg and T2=100 ns corresponding to a frequency f2=1/T2=10 MHz of the sensing pulse 104. This gives τmax˜(4.3, 1.3, 0.6)ns which could conveniently be corrected for for low values of θ or high values of P, for maximal suppression of non-interacting terms in the received signal.
We define two groups of nonlinear distortion terms in the received signal:
Group A originates from the linear scattering, i.e. term (4) of Eq. (1), of the forward accumulative nonlinear propagation distortion components in the incident wave, i.e. combination of term (1+2) and term (4) in Eq. (1). The self-distortion terms are always positive, and the harmonic distortion of the waves hence increases accumulatively with propagation depth, attenuated by absorption that increases with harmonic frequency, and geometric spread of the waves. For the nonlinear interaction term where the waves cross each other at an angle θ, the nonlinear term of the propagation velocity in Eq. (2) will oscillate with propagation depth due to the oscillations in p(s) in Eq. (3), and with adequately large angle θ between the beams, the forward propagation distortion of this term is oscillatory and may be negligible for strong nonlinear interaction scattering terms.
Group B originates directly in the local nonlinear scattering of the incident waves, i.e. term (5), and is often be weaker than the Group A for terms where the forward nonlinear accumulation distortion is effective. With an adequately large angle θ between the 1st and 2nd incident waves the nonlinear forward distortion is low for the nonlinear interaction term Eqs. (5,6), but not for the self distortion terms, and this allows detection of the nonlinear interaction scattering with the current invention.
There is also in principle a Group C found as local nonlinear scattering from term (5) of the forward accumulative nonlinear propagation distortion components in the incident wave, i.e. interaction between term (1+2) and term (5) in Eq. (1), but typical nonlinear material parameters are so low that this group is negligible.
We note that the harmonic bands of 201 and 202 are not shown in the Figure. In many situations one can get harmonic bands from self distortion components of the incident bands 201 or 202 that interferes with the nonlinearly interaction scattered bands 203 and 204, either through forward propagation distortion with linear scattering (Group A) or local nonlinear scattering (Group B), reducing the sensitivity to the nonlinear interaction scattering. Group A is generally the strongest, but Group B can also be strong with nonlinear resonant scatterers like ultrasound contrast agent micro-bubbles. One way to improve this situation is to use the method of pulse inversion where one transmits two pulse sets of 1st and 2nd pulses, changing the polarity of one of p1 and p2 for the 2nd pulse set. The polarity of the scattered nonlinear interaction term ˜2p1p2 will then change polarity for the 2nd pulse set, while the even (2nd, 4th, . . . ) harmonic self-distortion components ˜p12 and p22, for both Group A and Group B scattering, will not change polarity. Hence, subtracting the receive signals from these two transmit events in the method often referred to as pulse inversion, will then enhance the nonlinear interaction scattering term above even harmonic components of the incident bands. The transmitted pulse 103, p1, will in the current example arrive at the receiving transducer 102 at the same time as the nonlinear interaction scattered signal. Changing the polarity of p2 (104) in this pulse inversion process, will then suppress potential received components of p1 in the received signal at 102. Linearly scattered components from the pulse p2, which has changed polarity, at 102 will be enhanced in this process, and can be suppressed by filtering in the time domain.
With a distance L between transducer array 101 and 102 the manipulation wave (1st wave) propagates a distance L-z to the interaction depth z, while the sensing wave (2nd wave) propagates a distance 2z back and forth to the interaction depth z. The frequency f2 for the 2nd wave p2 (sensing wave) is chosen as high as possible to obtain adequate signal and best possible resolution for the depth range. To further improve sensitivity for the nonlinear interaction term ˜2p1(r,t)p2(r,t) for L−z large, it is useful to select the frequency f1 of the 1st wave p1 (manipulation wave) as low as possible for low absorption, but adequately high to get an adequately collimated pulse 103, p1. We call this the low frequency (LF) pulse. The high frequency (HF) f2 is selected high to get adequate spatial resolution for the given imaging depth into the object, for example with the frequency ratio f1:f2˜1:3-1:30. In particularly preferred embodiments the ratio is in the order of ˜1:10. For ultrasound imaging one could for example in one application choose f2˜10 MHz to image down to 40 mm with f1˜1 MHz, or in another application choose f2˜3.5 MHz to image down to 150 mm with f1˜0.3 MHz, i.e. a frequency ratio of about 1:10. Similar examples are found for scattering of EM waves. For imaging of contrast agent micro-bubbles at frequencies f2 well above the bubble resonance frequency, one would preferably choose f1 below or around the resonance frequency, as the LF pulse 103 would then manipulate the bubble diameter.
In
The example embodiment in
To get strong nonlinear scattering one wants as high amplitude of the 1st transmitted pulse as possible, and this limits the pulse length to avoid over-heating of the transducer array and the tissue. We should note that with this arrangement of the arrays, the 1st transmit pulse 103 will hit the receiver array 102 at the same time as the nonlinearly scattered signal components from Z which are much lower in amplitude. This can cause difficulties in adequate suppression of the receive components of the pulse 103 to show the nonlinear interaction scattering components with high sensitivity, especially with low difference between the frequency f1 of pulse 103 and the nonlinear interaction components to be detected. The frequency selections described in
When the manipulation pulse p1 has much lower frequency than the imaging pulse p2, as exemplified in
With this method one hence gets regions of strong nonlinear interaction scattering with depth distance λ1/4 within the whole overlap region, indicated as the lines 507 within the overlap region 500 in
The transmitted pulse amplitudes can be increased to increase the nonlinear interaction scattering by using overlapping, focused transmit pulses 103 and 104, and scanning said focused beams in the azimuth direction for 2D imaging, and both azimuth and elevation direction for 3D imaging, with adapted receive beam scanning, according to known methods. Elevation scanning for 3D imaging can be done by mechanical motion of the array structure as illustrated by the arrows 112 in
A block diagram of an instrument according to the invention is shown in
To provide maximal sensitivity to the frequency components in the nonlinear interaction scattered signal the scattered signal can also be picked up by a third array, for example illustrated as 607 in
When the object can be completely surrounded by arrays, for example as with breast imaging, one can conveniently use a ring array known in the art for transmission of pulsed beams 103 and 104 where the direction of the beams are freely selectable by selecting the elements of the ring array used for the transmission. The ring array gives large flexibility for choosing the receive array aperture. This selection is convenient to provide spatial compounding of images obtained by different directions of the beams, known in the art. For transmission of pulses 103 and 104 that are widely separated in frequency as in
In
We have used ultrasound imaging as an example, but similar geometrical arrangements of transmitters and receivers can according to the invention also be used with EM waves. For EM imaging with frequencies in the GHz and THz range, the transmit means and receive means can be strip antennas or maser/laser diodes, and arrays of elements of these. For EM imaging in the infrared-optical frequency range, simple solutions for the transmit means are arrays of laser diodes, or mechanically direction steered laser diodes. Simple solutions for the receive detector means can be light sensing diodes/transistors or focused camera systems (e.g. a CCD camera) that provides real time imaging of the scattered signal from the whole interaction region. To further increase the sensitivity to the nonlinear interaction scattered signal, one can conveniently average the receive signal or image signal from many transmit events for each individual interaction region, according to known methods.
Thus, while there have been shown and described and pointed out fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood that various omissions and substitutions and changes in the form and details of the devices illustrated, and in their operation, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention.
It is also expressly intended that all combinations of those elements and/or method steps which perform substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve the same results are within the scope of the invention. Moreover, it should be recognized that structures and/or elements and/or method steps shown and/or described in connection with any disclosed form or embodiment of the invention may be incorporated in any other disclosed or described or suggested form or embodiment as a general matter of design choice. It is the intention, therefore, to be limited only as indicated by the scope of the claims appended hereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1421936 | Dec 2014 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2015/053775 | 12/10/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/092305 | 6/16/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5623928 | Wright | Apr 1997 | A |
5793701 | Wright | Aug 1998 | A |
7727156 | Angelsen | Jun 2010 | B2 |
9291493 | Angelsen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
20090067458 | Ji | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090178483 | Angelsen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100036244 | Angelsen | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120050750 | Hays | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120169053 | Tchoryk, Jr. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194549 | Osterhout | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120235884 | Miller | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120274937 | Hays | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288114 | Duraiswami | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130314694 | Tchoryk, Jr. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20150287422 | Short | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101262960 | Sep 2008 | CN |
2012035312 | Aug 2013 | CN |
104125801 | Oct 2014 | CN |
2012035312 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese First Office Action and Search Report for corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 2015800755822 and English Translation, dated Jan. 22, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170343656 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |