This application is based upon and claims priority to Chinese Patent Application No. 202210587749.5, filed on May 27, 2022, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure relates to a method for improving a monitoring capability of a borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring system, and belongs to the technical field of coal mine safety.
Rock burst is one of the major disasters in coal mines and accurate monitoring and early warning of rock burst has been a difficult problem for the industry.
As the most reliable means of monitoring and early warning for rock burst, micro-seismic monitoring technology plays an important role in the temporal-spatial early warning of rock burst. Generally, if the micro-seismic monitoring system can acquire and record rich micro-seismic signals, it can clearly reflect the evolution trend of rock burst. In field application in recent years, the on-site adverse conditions have seriously affected the reliability of micro-seismic monitoring and the accuracy of early warning analysis, limiting the monitoring effectiveness. The on-site adverse conditions include blind heading, the fracture of overlying strata in the far field behind the goaf, and the operation of belt and material transportation equipment. Due to the on-site adverse conditions, it is impossible to effectively cover and surround the target area with underground sensors, and there is a lot of ambient noise, which greatly limits the complete acquisition and reliable analysis of micro-seismic signals.
At present, according to the location of the mining and production area, surface sensors and underground sensors are combined to form a borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network, which can significantly improve the monitoring capability of the micro-seismic monitoring system. However, the installation positions of surface sensors are mainly selected and designed based on workers' experience. This is not scientific and cannot meet the requirements of effectively deploying the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring system on site to completely monitor and record micro-seismic signals generated in mining and production.
In view of the problems existing in the prior art, the present disclosure provides a method for improving a monitoring capability of a borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring system. The present disclosure can determine an optimal installation position for a surface monitoring sensor, and significantly improve the observation capability of a borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring system, such that the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring system can completely acquire micro-seismic signals of various energy levels generated in mining and production.
In order to achieve the above objective, the present disclosure provides the following technical solution. The method for improving a monitoring capability of a borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring system includes the following steps:
Further, in step (1), the multiple candidate points selected for installing the surface wireless sensors satisfy the following conditions: the candidate points cooperate with the underground sensors to surround the mining and production area; the candidate points have a distance of no more than 2,000 m from the mining and production area; the candidate points avoid a waterlogged area, a surface water system, a highway facility, and a noisy place; and the candidate points provide strong fourth-generation/fifth-generation (4G/5G) network signals.
Further, step 401) includes: determining α1 and α2 as follows: manually marking the first-arrival peak amplitude f of the P-wave recorded by each underground sensor; calculating a source position and micro-seismic energy E of multiple micro-seismic signals with different energy levels; calculating a distance r from the micro-seismic source to the underground sensor; and determining α1 and α2 by a nonlinear least squares (NLS) method.
Further, in step 403), the calculating a minimum micro-seismic energy Ei,j,kmin to trigger the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plan Gv to record the micro-seismic signal, at a point (Xi, Yj, Zk) includes:
Further, in step 40301, the ambient noise level NL includes a surface ambient noise level NLs monitored by the surface sensor installed on a surface and an underground ambient noise level NLu monitored by the underground sensor installed in an underground roadway.
Further, in step (5), the genetic algorithm sets a generation number of not less than 100; and the genetic algorithm carries out mutation operation through a mixture of adjacent gene mutation, gene insertion mutation, gene exchange mutation, three-point gene exchange mutation, and two-point inversion mutation, and carries out crossover operation through a mixture of partially mapped crossover, cycle crossover operator, edge recombination crossover, linear sequential crossover, ordered crossover operator, and uniform crossover.
The present disclosure selects multiple candidate points for installing surface wireless sensors to form a natural-number-coded candidate point set, and combines a fixed number of candidate points randomly selected from the candidate point set with an underground installed sensor set to form a borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network. The present disclosure carries out multiple random selections until a certain scale of borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plans are generated. The present disclosure establishes an evaluation model for a monitoring capability of each borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plan according to a propagation relation equation between the micro-seismic energy and the first-arrival peak amplitude of the P-wave, and forms an initial population. The present disclosure determines an optimal borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plan through a genetic algorithm, and determines an optimal surface wireless sensor deployment plan that significantly improves the monitoring capability of the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plan. The present disclosure provides effective guidance for the on-site adjustment and optimization of the installation position of the surface wireless sensor and ensures that the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring system can observe the micro-seismic activities of various energy levels generated during the mining and production process of a mine. Therefore, the present disclosure significantly improves the reliability of the micro-seismic monitoring system for the monitoring of rock burst and the accuracy of early warning analysis.
The present disclosure is further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As shown in
i∈1,2, . . . , m1; j∈1,2, . . . , n1; k∈1,2, . . . , p1, v∈1,2, . . . , p.
Further, in step (1), the multiple candidate points selected for installing the surface wireless sensors satisfy the following conditions: the candidate points cooperate with the underground sensors to surround the mining and production area; the candidate points have a distance of no more than 2,000 m from the mining and production area; the candidate points avoid a waterlogged area, a surface water system, a highway facility, and a noisy place; and the candidate points provide strong fourth-generation/fifth-generation (4G/5G) network signals.
Further, in step 401), α1 and α2 are determined as follows. The first-arrival peak amplitude f of the P-wave recorded by each underground sensor is manually marked and a source position and micro-seismic energy E of multiple micro-seismic signals with different energy levels are calculated. A distance r from the micro-seismic source to the underground sensor is calculated. α1 and α2 are determined by a nonlinear least squares (NLS) method.
Further, in step 403), the minimum micro-seismic energy Ei,j,kmin to trigger the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plan Gv to record the micro-seismic signal, at a point (Xi, Yj, Zk) in the grid model is calculated as follows:
Further, in step 40301, the ambient noise level NL includes a surface ambient noise level NLs, monitored by the surface sensor installed on a surface and an underground ambient noise level NLu monitored by the underground sensor installed in an underground roadway.
Further, in step (5), the genetic algorithm sets a generation number of not less than 100; and the genetic algorithm carries out mutation operation through a mixture of adjacent gene mutation, gene insertion mutation, gene exchange mutation, three-point gene exchange mutation, and two-point inversion mutation, and carries out crossover operation through a mixture of partially mapped crossover, cycle crossover operator, edge recombination crossover, linear sequential crossover, ordered crossover operator, and uniform crossover.
G1=[S21S42S203S344S695U1U2U3U4]
In the plan, S21 denotes a candidate point that is a 1st candidate point randomly selected from the candidate point set S and is a 2nd candidate point in the candidate point set S; similarly, S695 denotes a candidate point that is a 5th candidate point randomly selected from the candidate point set S and is a 69th candidate point in the candidate point set S; and k=4 denotes a number of underground sensors. The coordinates of the sensors are provided in the following table.
The first-arrival peak amplitude f of the P-wave recorded by the underground sensors is manually marked and a distance r from the micro-seismic source to the underground sensor is calculated as follows:
The data are brought into the propagation relation equation between the micro-seismic energy E and the first-arrival peak amplitude f of a P-wave.
According to the NLS method, it is determined that α1 and α2 are 7.28352×10−7 and 0.0012836 respectively and a comparison between the original data and fitted data of the first-arrival peak amplitude f of the P-wave is plotted, as shown in
The minimum micro-seismic energy Ei,j,kmin to trigger the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plan Gv to record the micro-seismic signal, at the point (Xi, Yj, Zk) in the 3D equidistant grid model formed in step 402) is calculated, i∈1,2, . . . , 14; j∈1,2, . . . , 10; k∈1,2, . . . , 5; v∈1,2, . . . 100. The minimum micro-seismic energy E1,1,1min to trigger the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plan G2=G2=[S11S82S373S654S725U1U2U3U4] to record the micro-seismic signal at the point [X1=19382312, Y1=4322587, Z1=600] is calculated as follows:
f={6×10−8,6×10−8,6×10−8,6×10−8,1.5×10−6,1.5×10−6,1.5×10−6,1.5×10 −6}
between the micro-seismic energy E and the first-arrival peak amplitude f of the P-wave determined in step 401, a micro-seismic energy required to trigger each sensor is back-calculated as follows:
E1,1,1l={565.2, 331.4, 220.9, 1149.4, 802.4, 1983.2, 1576.1, 615.2, 2880.8}.The micro-seismic energy calculated is sorted in an ascending order. A fourth micro-seismic energy in {220.9, 331.4, 565.2, 615.2, 802.4 , 1149.4, 1576.1, 1983.2, 2880.8} is selected as the minimum micro-seismic energy E1,1,1min=615.2 to trigger the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plan to record the micro-seismic signal.
Steps 40302 and 40303 are repeated until the Ei,j,kmin at all points in the grid model is calculated.
For example, the monitoring capability of the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plan G2 is calculated as follows:
The monitoring capabilities of the borehole-surface micro-seismic monitoring network deployment plan set G are calculated as follows:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
202210587749.5 | May 2022 | CN | national |