1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of semiconductor circuit design, and more particularly to the design of improved power regulators.
2. Description of the Related Art
Many electronic power supplies feature voltage regulators, or regulator circuits, designed to automatically maintain a constant output voltage level to effectively provide a steady voltage to the electronic circuit to which power is being supplied, typically referred to as the load. More particularly, the object of a voltage regulator circuit is to maintain a steady output voltage regardless of current drawn by the load. Most present day voltage regulators operate by comparing the actual output voltage to a fixed—typically internal—reference voltage. The difference between the actual output voltage and reference voltage is amplified, and used for controlling a regulation element, to form a negative feedback servo control loop. The regulation element is typically configured to produce a higher voltage when the output voltage is too low, and in case of some regulators, to produce a lower voltage when the output voltage is too high. In many cases, the regulation element may be configured to simply stop sourcing current, and depend on the current drawn by the driven load to pull down the regulator output voltage. The control loop has to be carefully designed to produce the desired tradeoff between stability and speed of response.
The operation of power supplies is typically affected by variations on the input voltage (or power supply) line that provides the voltage based on which the regulated output voltage is generated. Any signal or noise (including transients, which may reach very high levels relative to the level of the desired output voltage) on the supply line may couple into, and may be amplified by the active circuitry, thereby degrading the performance of the power supply. Therefore, in addition to design considerations related to stability and speed of response, power supplies are also typically designed to achieve a desired power supply rejection ratio (PSRR), which is indicative of the amount of noise (on the supply line) that the power regulator is capable of rejecting. Various systems may specify different power supply rejection requirements. For example, an internal power regulator using a 25 pF output capacitor in an automotive environment may experience power supply variations that range from 5V to 26V and may include transient spikes as high as 40V. Thus, any power supply or regulator designed to properly function in such an environment would need to be designed to reject all such variations and transients.
Therefore, one measure of the effectiveness of a voltage regulator circuit is its ability to respond to system transients. For example, if the load coupled to a voltage regulator is an integrated circuit (IC) in which a large number of drivers may switch states simultaneously, the demand for current from the voltage regulator may change suddenly. An ideal voltage regulator is able to meet the demand for increased current while maintaining its designed output voltage Vout. However, this may not always be practical for a given voltage regulator circuit and a given load. In practice, a load capacitance (coupled between the voltage output node and ground) is typically provided in order to meet the immediate demand for increased current. Typical solutions for increasing power supply rejection include use of a large load capacitor, and/or use of a pass transistor coupled at the output.
In addition, in some situations, a circuit used to implement a voltage regulator may be subject to short circuit or overload conditions for a significant amount of time. In such cases, the circuit may become damaged without protection against excessive currents that may result from such conditions. Similarly, other types of circuits (e.g., amplifiers) may also be susceptible to problems similar to those discussed above with regard to voltage regulators. Many other problems and disadvantages of the prior art will become apparent to one skilled in the art after comparing such prior art with the present invention as described herein.
In one set of embodiments, a voltage regulator may comprise a regulator output configured to provide a regulated voltage, built around an error amplifier powered by a supply voltage and having a first input configured to receive a reference signal. The voltage regulator may include a pass transistor having a control terminal coupled to an output of the error amplifier, and a channel coupled between the supply voltage and the regulator output. A control loop may be formed by coupling the regulator output to a second input of the error amplifier, which may comprise an output stage configured to provide the output signal of the error amplifier. In one embodiment, the error amplifier may be configured to control its output stage to conduct current during a rising edge of the supply voltage to prevent the regulated output voltage from rising during the rising edge of the supply voltage.
The voltage regulator output may be configured with a voltage divider, which may include a first resistor coupled between the second input of the error amplifier and the regulator output, and a second resistor coupled between the regulator output and a voltage reference, which may be reference ground. In one set of embodiments, the error amplifier may comprise a first input transistor having a first channel terminal configured to draw a first portion of a first current generated from the supply voltage, and a control terminal configured as the first input of the error amplifier. The error amplifier may further have a second input transistor with a first channel terminal configured to draw a second portion of the first current, and a control terminal configured as the second input of the error amplifier. The first and second input transistors may constitute an input stage of the error amplifier, and may be coupled to the output stage of the error amplifier.
In one set of embodiments, the output stage of the error amplifier may include four output transistors, and a current mirror configured to provide current to the four transistors. The first output transistor may have a first channel terminal coupled to the regulator output and configured to draw a second current generated from the supply voltage, a second channel terminal coupled to a second channel terminal of the first input transistor, and a control terminal configured to receive a biasing signal. The second output transistor may have a first channel terminal configured to draw a third current generated from the supply voltage, a second channel terminal coupled to a second channel terminal of the second input transistor, and a control terminal configured to receive the biasing signal. The third output transistor may be configured with a first channel terminal coupled to the second channel terminal of the first output transistor, a second channel terminal coupled to a voltage reference (which may be reference ground), and a control terminal coupled to a control node. Finally, the fourth output transistor may have a first channel terminal coupled to the second channel terminal of the second output transistor, a second channel terminal coupled to the voltage reference, and a control terminal coupled to the control node. A capacitor may be coupled between the control node and the regulator output to achieve frequency compensation. In one embodiment, a capacitor may be configured between the supply voltage and the control terminals of the third and fourth transistors to effect additional current to flow through the respective channels of the third and fourth output transistors, to prevent the first and second output transistors from turning off during a rising edge of the supply voltage.
A method of operating an electronic circuit may include providing a supply voltage to the electronic circuit, providing a reference signal to the electronic circuit, generating an output signal based on the supply voltage, the reference signal, and an error signal, and generating a feedback signal based on the output signal, with an output stage of the electronic circuit generating the error signal based on the supply voltage, the reference signal, and the feedback signal. The output stage may be controlled from within the electronic circuit to have the output stage continue to conduct current during a rising edge of the supply voltage to prevent the output signal from rising to the level of the supply voltage during the rising edge of the supply voltage. In one embodiment, controlling the output stage may include preventing a pair of cascode transistors configured in the output stage from turning off during the rising edge of the supply voltage, by causing an additional current to flow through a pair of output transistors having their respective channels coupled between respective channel terminals of the pair of cascode transistors and a voltage reference.
Various embodiments of a regulator circuit may therefore provide improved power supply rejection for very large, fast steps on the voltage supply rail, without a need for any external components, and only requiring very few additional internal components (e.g. a 1 pF capacitor). The voltage regulators may be implemented with a topology that includes a PMOS pass device, while still providing very good rejection of power supply variations, and prevent loss of feedback control during large supply transients.
Other aspects of the present invention will become apparent with reference to the drawings and detailed description of the drawings that follow.
The foregoing, as well as other objects, features, and advantages of this invention may be more completely understood by reference to the following detailed description when read together with the accompanying drawings in which:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims. Note, the headings are for organizational purposes only and are not meant to be used to limit or interpret the description or claims. Furthermore, note that the word “may” is used throughout this application in a permissive sense (i.e., having the potential to, being able to), not a mandatory sense (i.e., must).” The term “include”, and derivations thereof, mean “including, but not limited to”. The term “connected” means “directly or indirectly connected”, and the term “coupled” means “directly or indirectly connected”.
Using the circuit shown in
As mentioned above, power regulators are oftentimes required in an automotive environment, where an internal regulator may be configured with a 25 pF capacitor at the output, and may be required to reject power supply variations (on the power/voltage supply rail) that range from 5V to 26V, while also rejecting transient spikes, which may reach voltage levels as high as 40V. Referring to voltage regulator 100 in
Considering circuit 200 without capacitor 206, a large and quick (on the order of ns or even a few μs) power supply step (transient) may cause cascode transistors 222 and 226 to begin turning off during the rising edge of the transition period (of the supply step), as output signal Vreg 234 begins to rise. Beyond a certain point, PMOS transistor 214 of the input stage of amplifier 201 may turn off, and the gate-drain capacitance of PMOS device 214 may begin to dominate, causing the voltage at the drain of PMOS transistor device 214 (and consequently, at the source of NMOS transistor device 222) to rise, and effectively turn off cascode transistors 222 and 226, causing regulated output Vreg 234 no longer being controlled by the feedback loop, which may result in the regulated output Vreg 234 rising to the supply voltage level Vdd.
In order to prevent the event described above, capacitor 206 may be coupled between power supply rail Vdd and the respective gate terminals of NMOS transistors 204, 221, 238, and 240 as shown. In order to obtain adequate frequency compensation, capacitor 207—having a value equivalent to the Miller capacitance associated with circuit 200—may also be coupled between regulated output Vreg 234 and the low impedance node formed at the source terminal of NMOS device 226 and drain terminal of NMOS device 240 coupled together within the output stage of amplifier 201. It should be noted that circuit 200 may also include additional components configured to provide the bias voltage Vbnc for NMOS cascode device 218. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a variety of different biasing circuits are possible, and any one of the many possible biasing circuits may be configured in circuit 200 to provide the required bias voltage to NMOS device 218.
Capacitor 206 coupled as shown in
Various embodiments of regulator circuit presented in
Although the embodiments above have been described in considerable detail, other versions are possible. Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications. Note the section headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and are not meant to limit the description provided herein or the claims attached hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3980935 | Worst | Sep 1976 | A |
4442529 | Ahuja et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4611289 | Coppola | Sep 1986 | A |
4851987 | Day | Jul 1989 | A |
5222239 | Rosch | Jun 1993 | A |
5230074 | Canova, Jr. et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5278523 | Kriz | Jan 1994 | A |
5283792 | Davies, Jr. et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5300874 | Shimamoto et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5339446 | Yamasaki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341112 | Haman | Aug 1994 | A |
5369771 | Gettel | Nov 1994 | A |
5386201 | Bennett et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386552 | Garney | Jan 1995 | A |
5410713 | White et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5423045 | Kannan et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5440277 | Ewen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450003 | Cheon | Sep 1995 | A |
5581772 | Nanno et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5638540 | Aldous | Jun 1997 | A |
5691663 | Nayebi et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5717560 | Doyle et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5764110 | Ishibashi | Jun 1998 | A |
5907464 | Maloney et al. | May 1999 | A |
5936460 | Iravani | Aug 1999 | A |
5936478 | Lee et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945883 | Nagasawa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956219 | Maloney | Sep 1999 | A |
6008970 | Maloney et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6066991 | Natio et al. | May 2000 | A |
6118266 | Manohar et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6194917 | Deng | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6268993 | Anderson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271652 | Burstein et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292050 | Dooley et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6377130 | Haman | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6433621 | Smith et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6462625 | Kim | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6492796 | Morley | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522208 | Knowles | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6541946 | Chen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560081 | Vashchenko et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577481 | Steinhoff et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6690555 | Pasqualini | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6744610 | Chang et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6747501 | Ker et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6750684 | Lim | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760209 | Sharpe-Geisler | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768176 | Litfin | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771117 | Nakai | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6775217 | Kato et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788507 | Chen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800906 | Cheng | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809557 | Gauthier et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809603 | Ho | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6829126 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6838775 | Takahashi | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6844595 | Chen | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853258 | Toliver et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6864536 | Lin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6876529 | Li | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6897637 | Chen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6930534 | Fu | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6985040 | Kim | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992533 | Hollinger et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7076229 | Wang | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7129798 | Aoyama et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132880 | Ingino, Jr. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7164325 | Aparin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7180331 | Gosmain et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7230806 | Poon et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248025 | Adachi | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7342465 | Seefeldt | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358780 | Chou | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7501867 | Poulton et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7554307 | Moraveji | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7573322 | Gatta et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7656145 | Xiao et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7688051 | Li et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
20040251980 | Hollinger et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060232326 | Seitz et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070036017 | Seo | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070210857 | Wu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070273453 | Maher | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070290660 | Yamazaki | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080084249 | Noguchi | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0187369 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0547862 | Jun 1993 | EP |
9006552 | Jun 1990 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100176875 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |