The present invention relates to a method of improving the visibility of a liquid crystal display device, the method capable of, when the screen of the liquid crystal display device is observed through a polarizer such as sunglasses, ensuring excellent visibility regardless of the angle of observation, and the present invention also relates to a liquid crystal display device using the same.
In recent years, liquid crystal display devices (LCDs) have expanded applications, and LCDs are applied even to various displays used outdoors. The applications of LCDs have been expanded, for example, to instrument panels of automobiles, ships, and airplanes; mobile devices such as automobile-mounted navigation systems, digital cameras, mobile phones, and personal computers; and digital signages used in buildings, supermarkets, and other facilities.
An LCD performs display by causing a liquid crystal panel, in which a liquid crystal cell is sandwiched between two polarizers, to transmit or block the light from outside or the light generated by a light source such as frontlight or backlight. As the backlight light source, it is ordinary to use fluorescent tubes such as cold-cathode tubes or hot-cathode tubes. The spectral distribution of fluorescent tubes such as cold-cathode tubes or hot-cathode tubes shows an emission spectrum having two or more peaks. The combination of colors in such a discontinuous emission spectrum provides a white light source. Meanwhile, the applications of light-emitting diodes, which consume low power, have been studied in view of energy conservation. In particular, white light-emitting diodes (white LEDs) have a more continuous and wider emission spectrum than that of fluorescent tubes, and also have an excellent luminous efficiency.
Incidentally, there is a case where, in an environment such as outdoors in the strong sunlight, an observer views an LCD while wearing sunglasses having polarization properties to eliminate the glare. In this case, the observer views, through polarizers, linearly polarized light emitted from the LCD. Therefore, the screen cannot be viewed depending on the angle between the absorption axis of a polarizer included in the LCD and the absorption axis of a polarizer such as sunglasses.
To solve the above problem, for example, Patent Document 1 proposes a method for performing depolarization by layering a retardation (one-quarter wavelength) film obliquely on the surface of an LCD to convert linearly polarized light into circularly polarized light.
In addition, Patent Document 2 proposes the use of a highly birefringent material, such as calcite or synthetic quartz, as a depolarizing device to solve the above problem. This solution makes use of the following properties: If a highly birefringent material such as calcite or synthetic quartz is inserted between crossed polarizers (i.e., crossed-nicols), the light transmitted through the highly birefringent material having a great retardation (e.g., a retardation of higher than 100,000 nm) becomes light having various wavelengths. Thus, the resulting light interferes with itself due to the various wavelengths and presents white light.
Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent Laid-open Publication No. 2005-352068
Patent Document 2: Japanese Patent Laid-open Publication No. Hei 10-10522
However, even the retardation (one-quarter wavelength) film merely achieves a phase difference of one-quarter wavelength of light only in a specific wavelength region, and there cannot have been obtained a material for achieving a phase difference of one-quarter wavelength uniformly over the wide visible-light region. Thus, the method of Patent Document 1 cannot provide the effect of sufficiently improving a visibility.
In addition, the method of Patent Document 2 requires the use of a highly birefringent material formed of a special material such as calcite or synthetic quartz. This complicates the structure of a liquid crystal display device, and therefore, this makes it difficult to employ a structure with a high degree of freedom for increasing the screen size or reducing the weight. Thus, this method has little practicality.
The present invention has been completed to solve the above problem, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a liquid crystal display device capable of, when the screen thereof is observed through a polarizer such as sunglasses, ensuring an excellent visibility to a high degree regardless of the angle of observation.
The present inventors have intensively studied to attain the above object, and as a result, they have found that the combined use of a specific backlight light source and a polymer film having a specific retardation makes it possible to solve the above problems, thereby leading to the completion of the present invention.
That is, the present invention includes the following inventions set forth in (i) to (vi) below:
(i) A method for improving a visibility of a liquid crystal display device at least comprising a backlight light source, a liquid crystal cell, and a polarizer disposed on a viewing side of the liquid crystal cell, which method comprises:
using a white light-emitting diode as the backlight light source; and
using a polymer film having a retardation of from 3,000 to 30,000 nm, which polymer film is disposed on the viewing side of the polarizer so that an angle between an absorption axis of the polarizer and a slow axis of the polymer film becomes about 45 degrees.
(ii) The method for improving a visibility of a liquid crystal display device as described above, wherein the white light-emitting diode is a light-emitting device comprising a combination of an yttrium-aluminum-garnet yellow phosphor with a blue light-emitting diode using a compound semiconductor.
(iii) The method for improving a visibility of a liquid crystal display device as described above, wherein the polymer film is an oriented polycarbonate film.
(iv) The method for improving a visibility of a liquid crystal display device as described above, wherein the polymer film is an oriented polyester film.
(v) A liquid crystal display device using the method for improving a visibility as described above.
(vi) A polymer film to be used in the method for improving a visibility as described above.
The method of the present invention efficiently depolarizes linearly polarized light in a white light-emitting diode light source having a continuous and wide emission spectrum, and provides a spectrum approximated to that of the light source. This makes it possible that even when the screen of a liquid crystal display is observed through a polarizer such as sunglasses, an excellent visibility is ensured regardless of the angle of observation.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
In general, a liquid crystal panel comprises a back module, a liquid crystal cell, and a front module in order, starting from the side opposing a backlight source to the side on which an image is displayed (i.e., to the viewing side). The back module and the front module each ordinarily include a transparent substrate, a transparent conductive film formed on the surface of the transparent substrate on the liquid crystal cell side, and a polarizer disposed on the opposite side. In this regard, the polarizer in the back module is disposed on the side opposing the backlight source, and the polarizer in the front module is disposed on the side on which an image is displayed (i.e., on the viewing side).
The liquid crystal display device (LCD) of the present invention comprises, as components, at least a backlight source, a liquid crystal cell, and a polarizer disposed on the viewing side of the liquid crystal cell. As described above, it is ordinary that a liquid crystal cell is disposed between two polarizers, i.e., one on the backlight source side and the other on the viewing side. Therefore, another polarizer may also be disposed on the liquid crystal cell on the side opposite to the viewing side. Furthermore, the liquid crystal display device (LCD) may appropriately comprise other components, in addition to the above components, such as a color filter, a lens film, an optical diffusion sheet, and an antireflection film.
In the present invention, it is necessary to use white light-emitting diodes (white LEDs) as the backlight source of the liquid crystal display device (LCD). The white LEDs refer to phosphor-based devices, that is, devices that emit white light by the combined use of phosphors with light-emitting diodes using compound semiconductors to emit blue light or ultraviolet light. Among these devices, in particular, white light-emitting diodes comprising light-emitting devices obtained by the combined use of yttrium-aluminum-garnet yellow phosphors with blue light-emitting diodes using compound semiconductors are suitable as the backlight source of the present invention. This is because the white light-emitting diodes have a continuous and wide emission spectrum and also have an excellent luminous efficiency. Furthermore, the method of the present invention enables a wide range of the applications of white LEDs, which consume low power, and therefore, it can also attain the effect of energy conservation.
In this connection, a method including the combined use of red-emitting, green-emitting, and blue-emitting LEDs as a white light source has also been put to practical use. This method, however, is not preferred, because it provides a narrow and discontinuous emission spectrum, and therefore, it is expected to become difficult to obtain a desired effect of the present invention.
In addition, the present invention cannot use fluorescent tubes such as cold-cathode tubes or hot-cathode tubes either, which have hitherto been widely used as backlight sources. This is because the emission spectrum of each of these light sources is a discontinuous emission spectrum having peaks at specific wavelengths. Therefore, to produce white light by interference colors from such an emission spectrum, it is necessary to use a special inorganic material having a retardation of higher than 100,000 nm. This significantly restricts the design of liquid crystal display devices.
In the present invention, it is characterized that a polymer film having a specific range of retardation is disposed on the viewing side of the polarizer. The present inventors have obtained the idea of the present invention by focusing on the envelope curve shape of the interference color spectrum of the light transmitted through a birefringent material. That is, the present inventors have found that a visibility is significantly improved when the shape of the emission spectrum of a light source becomes similar to the envelope curve shape of the interference color spectrum of the light transmitted through a birefringent material, thereby leading to the completion of the present invention. More specifically, the effect of improving a visibility with the constituent features of the present invention is based on the following technical idea.
If a polymer film having birefringent properties is disposed between two mutually orthogonal polarizers, light is transmitted in such a manner that linearly polarized light emitted from the polarizers is disturbed when passing through the polymer film. The transmitted light shows an interference color specific to the retardation of the polymer film, which is the product of the birefringence and the thickness thereof. The present invention employs white LEDs having a continuous emission spectrum as the light source. This makes it possible to approximate the envelope curve shape of the spectrum of transmitted light, showing an interference color, to the emission spectrum of the light source by controlling the retardation in a specific range achievable also with a polymer film. The present invention has thus led to an improvement in visibility (see
To attain the above effect, the polymer film used in the present invention needs to have a retardation of from 3,000 to 30,000 nm. If the retardation is lower than 3,000 nm, a strong interference color is presented when the screen is observed through a polarizer such as sunglasses. This makes the envelope curve shape dissimilar to the emission spectrum of the light source, and therefore, it is not possible to ensure an excellent visibility. The lower limit of the retardation may preferably be 4,500 nm, more preferably 6,000 nm, still more preferably 8,000 nm, and further still more preferably 10,000 nm.
On the other hand, the upper limit of the retardation is 30,000 nm. A polymer film having a retardation of higher than 30,000 nm is not preferred. This is because the use of such a polymer film cannot substantially attain the effect of further improving a visibility, but also leads to a considerable increase in the thickness of the film. This reduces the handling ability of the film as an industrial material.
In this connection, the retardation of the present invention can be determined by measuring refractive indices in two mutually orthogonal directions and thickness, or can also be determined using a commercially available automatic birefringence analyzer such as KOBRA-21ADH (Oji Scientific Instruments).
In the present invention, white LEDs having a wide emission spectrum are used as the light source. Therefore, the adjustment of the retardation of a polymer film to the above range makes it possible to approximate the envelope curve shape of the spectrum of transmitted light to the emission spectrum of the light source only with a relatively simple structure. That is, in the case of a conventional technique, the use of a light source having a discontinuous emission spectrum requires the use of a birefringent material having a very high retardation (e.g., higher than 100,000 nm) for an improvement in visibility. In contrast, the present invention can attain a unique effect of improving a visibility with a relatively simple structure as described above, making use of the property of a white LED light source having a continuous emission spectrum.
The polymer film used in the present invention is disposed on the viewing side of the polarizer, which is disposed on the viewing side of the liquid crystal cell, so that an angle between the absorption axis of the polarizer and the slow axis of the polymer film becomes about 45 degrees. The method of disposing the polymer film on the viewing side of the polarizer may be performed by layering the polymer film directly on the outermost layer of the polarizer, or may be performed by disposing the polymer film on the polarizer via another transparent member. Alternatively, the polymer film may be provided on and attached to the top surface of the liquid crystal display device on the viewing side. When the polymer film is disposed directly or via another transparent member, the polymer film may preferably have a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer.
When the polymer film is disposed, it is desirable that the angle between the absorption axis of the polarizer and the slow axis of the polymer film should become about 45 degrees. This makes it possible to obtain highly transmitted light, even if a polarizer such as sunglasses is at any angle. In this connection, the above angle does not need to be exactly 45 degrees, and may appropriately be adjusted, if necessary, in the range where the effect of the present invention is not impaired. The range of the angle may preferably be from 30 to 60 degrees, and more preferably from 40 to 50 degrees.
The material of the polymer film used in the present invention is not particularly limited, but may be any material. Examples of the material of the polymer film may include polyesters such as polyethylene terephthalate and polyethylene naphthalate, polycarbonates, polystyrenes, polyether ether ketones, polyphenylene sulfides, and cycloolefin polymers. Among these, examples of the particularly preferred material may include polycarbonates and polyesters. The resins of these materials have excellent transparencies and also have excellent thermal and mechanical properties. This makes it possible to easily control the retardations of the resins by stretching. In particular, polyesters typified by polyethylene terephthalate are the most suitable materials, because they have high intrinsic birefringences, and therefore, they can relatively easily provide a great retardation, even if the thickness of the film is small.
Next, the polymer film of the present invention has specific birefringent properties, and therefore, it is desirable that the polymer film should be an oriented film. The method of producing the oriented film, however, is not particularly limited, so long as the film properties defined in the present invention are satisfied.
In the case of a polycarbonate film, an oriented polycarbonate film having a specific retardation can be obtained by stretching a non-oriented sheet in one direction (or in two directions, if necessary) at a temperature equal to or higher than the glass transition temperature thereof, which non-oriented sheet is obtained by melting polycarbonate and extruding the melted polycarbonate into a sheet. Suitable examples of the non-oriented polycarbonate sheet may also include commercially available ones and those which are produced by solution film formation.
Alternatively, in the case of a polyester film, as an example, a method is performed, in which a non-oriented polyester is stretched in the transverse direction by a tenter at a temperature equal to or higher than the glass transition temperature thereof, which non-oriented polyester is obtained by melting a polyester and extruding the melted polyester into a sheet, followed by heat treatment.
More specifically, the temperature for stretching in the transverse direction may preferably be from 80° C. to 130° C., and particularly preferably from 90° C. to 120° C. Furthermore, the stretch ratio for stretching in the transverse direction may preferably be from 2.5 to 6.0, and particularly preferably from 3.0 to 5.5. If the stretch ratio is too high, the transparency of the film to be obtained is likely to decrease. On the other hand, it is not preferred that the stretch ratio should be too low. This is because the stretch tension also decreases, and therefore, the birefringence of the film to be obtained decreases, which reduces the retardation. In the subsequent heat treatment, the treatment temperature may preferably be from 100° C. to 250° C., and particularly preferably from 180° C. to 245° C.
It is possible to control the retardation of the polymer film in a specific range by appropriately setting the stretch ratio, the stretch temperature, and the thickness of the polymer film. For example, the higher the stretch ratio, or the lower the stretch temperature, or the greater the thickness of the film, the more likely a great retardation is obtained. In contrast, the lower the stretch ratio, or the higher the stretch temperature, or the smaller the thickness of the film, the more likely a small retardation is obtained.
The polymer film of the present invention may be subjected to surface treatments, i.e., corona discharge treatment (e.g., in air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide gas) and adhesion facilitating treatment, by known methods, for the purpose of improving water resistance, chemical resistance, and adhesiveness between the film and a layer to be formed thereon, such as an adhesive layer, a release layer, and an antistatic layer. The adhesion facilitating treatment may be performed by various known methods. For example, a method may suitably be employed of applying one of various known adhesion facilitating agents to the film during the production process thereof, or to the film that has been uniaxially or biaxially stretched.
The polymer film used in the present invention may have any thickness, but may preferably have a thickness in the range of from 25 to 500 μm. Even a film having a thickness of lower than 25 μm can, in principle, provide a retardation of 3,000 nm or higher. In this case, however, the mechanical properties of the film become significantly anisotropic. This causes the film to, for example, tear or break, which significantly reduces the practicality of the film as an industrial material. The lower limit of the thickness may particularly preferably be 35 μm. On the other hand, the film having a thickness of higher than 500 μm is not preferred, because such a film is very rigid, which reduces flexibility inherent to a polymer film. This again reduces the practicality of the film as an industrial material. The upper limit of the film thickness may particularly preferably be 350 μm.
The present invention will hereinafter be described more specifically by way of Examples, but the present invention is not limited to the Examples described below. The present invention can be put into practice after appropriate modifications or variations within a range meeting the gist of the present invention, all of which are included in the technical scope of the present invention. In the following Examples, the methods for the evaluation of physical properties are as follows:
<Retardation>
A retardation is a parameter defined by the product (ΔN×d) of the anisotropy (ΔN=|Nx−Ny|) of the refractive indices in two mutually orthogonal directions on a film and the film thickness d (nm), and is a scale indicating optical isotropy or anisotropy. The anisotropy (ΔN) of refractive indices in two directions is obtained by the following method. The directions of orientation axes of a film were determined using two polarizers, and the film was cut into a rectangle of 4 cm×2 cm so that the directions of orientation axes are mutually orthogonal. The cut piece was used as a sample for measurement. The sample was measured for the refractive indices (Nx and Ny) in two mutually orthogonal directions and the refractive index (Nz) in the thickness direction by the use of an Abbe refractometer (NAR-4T available from ATAGO Co., Ltd.). Then, the absolute value (|Nx−Ny|) of the difference between the refractive indices in two directions was defined as the anisotropy (ΔN) of the refractive indices. The film thickness d (nm) was measured using an electric micrometer (Millitron 1245D available from Feinpruf GmbH), and was converted to the unit of nm. The retardation (Re) was determined by the product (ΔN×d) of the anisotropy (ΔN) of the refractive indices and the film thickness d (nm). In this connection, of the orientation axes, the axis indicating the greater refractive index is defined as a slow axis.
The following shows an example in which a polycarbonate film was used as the polymer film.
A polymer solution was prepared by dissolving polycarbonate (available from Aldrich Chemical Co.) into methylene chloride four times by weight. The polymer solution was spread on a flat and smooth glass plate with a knife coater, and was left at room temperature, and the solvent was dried. Then, the polycarbonate sheet was peeled from the glass plate, and was dried at 90° C. in a low-pressure dryer for 24 hours. A sample was cut into a dumbbell shape from the polycarbonate sheet obtained. The cut sheet sample was heated to a temperature of about 160° C. and uniaxially stretched using a tensilon (available from Orientec Co., Ltd.). The stretch ratio and the stretch rate during the stretching were adjusted, thereby obtaining an oriented polycarbonate film having a desired retardation.
The interference color of the oriented polycarbonate film obtained was observed. As a light source, white light-emitting diodes (NSPW500CS available from Nichia Corporation) were used, which included light-emitting devices obtained by the combined use of yttrium-aluminum-garnet yellow phosphors with blue light-emitting diodes.
Next, the interference color chart for the oriented polycarbonate film was prepared by simulation.
In the case where a birefringent material is disposed in a diagonal position between crossed nicols and a white light source is used as a backlight, if the light transmitted through the crossed nicols is defined as an interference color, the transmittance of the light is represented by the following formula (1):
I/I0=½·sin2(π·Re/λ) (1)
where I0 indicates the intensity of the light incident on the crossed nicols; I indicates the intensity of the light transmitted through the crossed nicols; and Re indicates the retardation of the birefringent material. The transmittance (I/I0) thus changes depending on the retardation and the wavelength of the light, and therefore, an interference color specific to the value of the retardation is observed.
However, the refractive indices of a polymer material (particularly in the short-wavelength region of visible light) have great wavelength-dispersive properties. Such wavelength-dispersive properties may vary depending on the polymer material. If the birefringence has wavelength dependence, the birefringence changes depending on the wavelength. Thus, when the above formula (1) was applied to oriented polycarbonate, the following formula (2) was applied in the experimental example, taking into consideration wavelength-dispersive properties inherent to polycarbonate.
I/I0=½·sin2(π·f(λ)·Re/λ) (2)
where f(λ) is a function representing the wavelength-dispersive properties of the birefringence.
Based on the above formula (2), a program was prepared for calculating an interference color, taking into consideration the wavelength-dispersive properties of the birefringence of the oriented polycarbonate film, and an interference color chart was prepared, which represented the relationship between the retardation and the interference color.
In addition,
In this connection,
In addition,
The following will show an example in which an oriented polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film was used as the polymer film.
First, 1,000 parts of dimethyl terephthalate, 700 parts of ethylene glycol, and 0.16 parts of manganese acetate tetrahydrate were put in a transesterification reaction vessel, transesterification reaction was performed at a temperature of from 120° C. to 210° C., and the generated methanol was distilled off. When the transesterification reaction was completed, 0.13 parts of antimony trioxide and 0.017 parts of orthophosphoric acid were added, and the pressure in the system was gradually reduced to 133 Pa for 75 minutes. Simultaneously, the temperature was gradually increased to 280° C. Under these conditions, polycondensation reaction was performed for 70 minutes, and the melted polymer was extruded into water through a discharge nozzle, thereby obtaining a PET resin having an intrinsic viscosity of 0.62 dl/g.
An unstretched film was produced by extruding the PET resin having an intrinsic viscosity of 0.62 dl/g onto a water-cooled rotary quenching drum through a film-forming die. The unstretched film was stretched 4.0 times in the transverse direction at 100° C., and then thermally fixed at 150° C., and further relaxed by 3% in the width direction while being cooled from 130° C. to 100° C., thereby obtaining an oriented PET film having a thickness of 38 μm (PET film 1).
In addition, an oriented PET film having a thickness of 200 μm (PET film 2) was obtained using a method similar to that of PET film 1 and changing the thickness of the unstretched film.
An unstretched film produced using a method similar to that of PET film 1 was heated to 105° C. using heated rolls and an infrared heater, and then stretched 3.4 times in the machine direction (i.e., in the running direction) by rolls different from each other in peripheral speed, thereby obtaining an oriented PET film having a thickness of 700 μm (PET film 3).
Table 1 shows the properties of the oriented PET films obtained by the above methods. Furthermore, Table 2 shows the state where each of the films was placed on a liquid crystal display device (having the structure where a liquid crystal cell was sandwiched between two polarizers) that employed, as a light source, white LEDs (NSPW500CS available from Nichia Corporation) having light-emitting devices obtained by the combined use of yttrium-aluminum-garnet yellow phosphors with blue light-emitting diodes, and each of the films was also placed on a liquid crystal display device (having the structure where a liquid crystal cell was sandwiched between two polarizers) that employed cold-cathode tubes as a backlight source, and the screen of each liquid crystal display device was viewed through sunglasses.
From the above results, it was understood that each of the produced films was able to provide the effect of improving a visibility when white LEDs were used as the backlight source, but was not able to provide the effect of improving a visibility when cold-cathode tubes were used as the backlight source.
The method for improving the visibility of a liquid crystal display according to the present invention can preferably be applied to liquid crystal display devices used outdoors, for example, instrument panels of automobiles, ships, and airplanes; mobile devices such as automobile-mounted navigation systems, digital cameras, mobile phones, and personal computers; and digital signages used in buildings, supermarkets, and other facilities.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
JP2009-259054 | Nov 2009 | JP | national |
This patent application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/509,211, filed on May 10, 2012, which is the U.S. national phase of International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/057956, filed May 11, 2010, which claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-259054, filed Nov. 12, 2009, which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4072779 | Knox et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4586790 | Umeda et al. | May 1986 | A |
4592623 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4799772 | Utsumi | Jan 1989 | A |
5145746 | Tomoyuki | Sep 1992 | A |
5231145 | Brueckmann et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5677024 | Abe et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5757447 | Kobayashi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5998925 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6025433 | Shibatoh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6055096 | Michihata et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069440 | Shimizu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6104484 | Nagata et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6130734 | Fujita et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6280890 | Sawamura et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285430 | Saito | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6521700 | Dworak et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6608332 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614179 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6839171 | Mizutani et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7026756 | Shimizu et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7071616 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7126274 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128952 | Murakami et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7215074 | Shimizu et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7329988 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7354150 | Sugimura et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7362048 | Shimizu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7531960 | Shimizu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7569269 | Takada et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7633583 | Wang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7682848 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7781068 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7855092 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7887718 | Nagatomi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901959 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7911553 | Tanaka | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7915631 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7943941 | Shimizu et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7968019 | Murakami | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968866 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7969090 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8139042 | Iijima | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8148177 | Shimizu et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8274631 | Wang et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8687152 | Izaki et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8760601 | Izaki et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9798189 | Murata et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9897857 | Murata et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10054816 | Murata et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10175494 | Murata et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10180597 | Murata et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10503016 | Murata et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
20010001207 | Shimizu et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20020061394 | Fujita | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061959 | Kajimaru et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030008162 | Oya et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030156235 | Kuzuhara et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040000868 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040004437 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040090180 | Shimizu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109302 | Yoneda et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040137265 | Shimada et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040222435 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040265539 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050030456 | Murakami et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050099562 | Nishikouji et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100723 | Tanaka et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106334 | Kubo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120528 | Okuda et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134774 | Coates et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050168816 | Fukaishi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050247223 | Sampei | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050275779 | Nanno | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280357 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060039070 | Sugimura et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060061717 | Ichihashi | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066946 | Liu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060210768 | Masuda | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215091 | Muramoto et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216437 | Murakami | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060227439 | Taki et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060275559 | Ishibashi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008451 | Tanaka | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070009676 | Tamagawa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070046864 | Maruyama et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070046865 | Umeda et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070048460 | Ikeda | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070054066 | Usukura et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058149 | Oshida et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070114914 | Shimizu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070159060 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178297 | Takada et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070184212 | Nimura et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202272 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070224415 | Satake et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238049 | Ezure | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242199 | Harada | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070264447 | Oya et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070285776 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023132 | Sano et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080036943 | Matsumoto et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049324 | Murakami et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080050583 | Kubo | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080131704 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080138527 | Okuma et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080138918 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080218666 | Toyooka | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233312 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080239178 | Nagai et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080246741 | Hinata | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266500 | Nimura | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080303995 | Shimodaira et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027599 | Ohgaru et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090059134 | Ishikawa et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090104413 | Ahn et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090139564 | Miyaji et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153965 | Ito et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090244446 | Yasuda et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090244474 | Fuchida et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090251643 | Yamada et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090280310 | Nitta et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303481 | Nakai | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315014 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315015 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316068 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001258 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100002171 | Yoshimi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100006819 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019224 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019270 | Shimizu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100053511 | Ohmuro et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073313 | Iijima | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100098939 | Tada et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117516 | Shimizu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100177397 | Kamiyama et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100220266 | Kashima et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100233389 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100264841 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100264842 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100296027 | Matsuhira et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110019275 | Suzuki | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110053299 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062864 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110085106 | Obata et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110128477 | Izaki et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110177314 | Tatami et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110194048 | Izaki et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110194052 | Hiratsuka et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110199561 | Hasegawa et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110255227 | Murakami | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110297990 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120015169 | Ohta | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120057230 | Murakami et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081785 | Iida et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113356 | Yu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113671 | Sadasivan et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120121824 | Toyama et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120189831 | Kawasaki et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120200811 | Sakai et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120229732 | Koike et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120250142 | Kobuchi et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130039031 | Asano et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130100378 | Murata et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130194211 | Shinohara et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130272020 | Koide et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130278560 | Yamaguchi | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130301130 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140028625 | Maeda et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140098325 | Murata et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104519 | Murata et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140232951 | Ueda et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140293197 | Shin et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150103295 | Hiratsuka et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150131038 | Ishiguro et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150131043 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150168779 | Kim et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150316696 | Kamijo et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150331282 | Yamada et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160011355 | Kokudo et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160048057 | Sekiguchi et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160209564 | Kuroda | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170261794 | Murata et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180173038 | Murata et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190146280 | Murata et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1320219 | Oct 2001 | CN |
1331272 | Jan 2002 | CN |
1495925 | May 2004 | CN |
1623107 | Jun 2005 | CN |
1636153 | Jul 2005 | CN |
1641897 | Jul 2005 | CN |
1656399 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1839176 | Sep 2006 | CN |
1892360 | Jan 2007 | CN |
1916667 | Feb 2007 | CN |
1927996 | Mar 2007 | CN |
1957273 | May 2007 | CN |
101067040 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101113309 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101156092 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101273465 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101358144 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101661190 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101799564 | Aug 2010 | CN |
102549485 | Jul 2012 | CN |
2871055 | May 2015 | EP |
S14-018675 | Nov 1939 | JP |
S49-060317 | Jun 1974 | JP |
S51-066163 | May 1976 | JP |
S52-010100 | Jan 1977 | JP |
S54-139921 | Oct 1979 | JP |
S56-033611 | Apr 1981 | JP |
S57-087331 | May 1982 | JP |
S58-098709 | Jun 1983 | JP |
S58-143305 | Aug 1983 | JP |
S59-077401 | May 1984 | JP |
S60-026304 | Feb 1985 | JP |
S60-097323 | May 1985 | JP |
S60-133402 | Sep 1985 | JP |
S62-135338 | Jun 1987 | JP |
S63-226603 | Sep 1988 | JP |
S63-307403 | Dec 1988 | JP |
H03-125302 | Dec 1991 | JP |
H04-163138 | Jun 1992 | JP |
H04-224811 | Aug 1992 | JP |
H04-256903 | Sep 1992 | JP |
H04-326419 | Nov 1992 | JP |
H06-051117 | Feb 1994 | JP |
H06-258634 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H08-101307 | Apr 1996 | JP |
H08-162070 | Jun 1996 | JP |
H08-271733 | Oct 1996 | JP |
H08-271734 | Oct 1996 | JP |
H09-033722 | Feb 1997 | JP |
H09-033920 | Feb 1997 | JP |
H09-097017 | Apr 1997 | JP |
H09-166711 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H09-169950 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H09-314782 | Dec 1997 | JP |
H10-010522 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H10-010558 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H10-107325 | Apr 1998 | JP |
H10-133817 | May 1998 | JP |
H10-161108 | Jun 1998 | JP |
H10-242513 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H10-268270 | Oct 1998 | JP |
H11-070629 | Mar 1999 | JP |
H11-301104 | Nov 1999 | JP |
H11-305217 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-082335 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-082338 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-141530 | May 2000 | JP |
2000-162419 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000-206333 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-206335 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-208815 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-231450 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-241625 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000-296595 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001-026762 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-051115 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-059907 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-098089 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-116926 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-141922 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-181568 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-231032 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-272534 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001-272682 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001-330729 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001-334623 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-031905 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-071921 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-088334 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-509283 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-116320 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-116877 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-198573 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-258760 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003-121818 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-121819 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-179259 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004-005540 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-009362 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-037841 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-142372 | May 2004 | JP |
2004-170875 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-189957 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-198929 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-205773 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-214069 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-219620 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-226591 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-226734 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-237451 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-252082 | Sep 2004 | JP |
3567927 | Sep 2004 | JP |
3589232 | Nov 2004 | JP |
3589233 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004-361774 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-114990 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-148519 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-157082 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-173462 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-181450 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-265889 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-266464 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-317985 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2005-321543 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2005-352068 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-062281 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-079067 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-106427 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-110754 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006-119623 | May 2006 | JP |
2006-133652 | May 2006 | JP |
2006-205579 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-205668 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-215107 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-215175 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-251294 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006-276574 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2006-276697 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2006-251859 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006-301592 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006-308917 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006-335853 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007-011280 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007-031496 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007-039535 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007-055222 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-059360 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-080953 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-086722 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-140248 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-152932 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-171707 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007-233114 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-233129 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-253512 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007-279243 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007-279469 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007-286447 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2007-304391 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2007-314717 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008-003425 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008-003541 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008-030370 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008-052067 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008-083115 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-090216 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008-132768 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008-155435 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-158180 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-160140 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-163078 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-192620 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008-208223 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2008-537803 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2008-242238 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008-256747 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008-256804 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008-257494 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008-265298 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2008-266392 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2008-276729 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2008-281866 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2008-546866 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009-006543 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-014886 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2009-042653 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009-102573 | May 2009 | JP |
2009-109995 | May 2009 | JP |
2009-139526 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2009-143226 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-150998 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-157347 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-157348 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-157361 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-157363 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-160830 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-169389 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-175685 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009-244711 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2009-251035 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2009-265626 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2009-269174 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2009-269301 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2009-282424 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2009-288395 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2009-294675 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2009-300611 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2009-300955 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010-026112 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010-032718 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010-044200 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010-046816 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010-046817 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010-046898 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010-054750 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010-054913 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010-079481 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010-080290 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010-096948 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010-107892 | May 2010 | JP |
2010-113054 | May 2010 | JP |
2010-139938 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010-209126 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010-217844 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010-224345 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010-224512 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010-243630 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010-244059 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010-271447 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2010-271509 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2010-277028 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2010-282212 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011-005854 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011-007830 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011-008169 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011-008170 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011-011364 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011-013302 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011-013402 | Jan 2011 | JP |
2011-028945 | Feb 2011 | JP |
2011-053271 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011-059488 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011-067952 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2011-070012 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2011-081359 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2011-088429 | May 2011 | JP |
2011-090042 | May 2011 | JP |
2011-099089 | May 2011 | JP |
2011-107198 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011-110718 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011-126158 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011-140139 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2011-140140 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2011-148301 | Aug 2011 | JP |
2011-164269 | Aug 2011 | JP |
2011-167914 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2011-181875 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2011-186290 | Sep 2011 | JP |
2011-195692 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2011-208147 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2011-215295 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2011-215646 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2011-227430 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2011-227436 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2012-003007 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012-003259 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012-013845 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012-025027 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012-025850 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012-027622 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012-083744 | Apr 2012 | JP |
2012-091336 | May 2012 | JP |
2012-103470 | May 2012 | JP |
2012-118201 | Jun 2012 | JP |
4962661 | Jun 2012 | JP |
2012-198879 | Oct 2012 | JP |
5051328 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2012-214026 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2012-214056 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2012-215623 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2012-215724 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2012-220879 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2012-256014 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2013-003952 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2013-029919 | Feb 2013 | JP |
4888853 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013-054207 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2013-079993 | May 2013 | JP |
2013-109116 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2013-539598 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2013-254171 | Dec 2013 | JP |
5370601 | Dec 2013 | JP |
2014-010315 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014-010316 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014-011318 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014-012373 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014-013367 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014-015035 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014-016476 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014-016590 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014-016591 | Jan 2014 | JP |
2014-032275 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2014-032276 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2014-044389 | Mar 2014 | JP |
2014-170223 | Sep 2014 | JP |
2014-215473 | Nov 2014 | JP |
2014-219438 | Nov 2014 | JP |
2015-055680 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2015-094903 | May 2015 | JP |
2015-132691 | Jul 2015 | JP |
2015-141346 | Aug 2015 | JP |
2015-215577 | Dec 2015 | JP |
2015-224267 | Dec 2015 | JP |
2016-021000 | Feb 2016 | JP |
2016-504632 | Feb 2016 | JP |
2017-068223 | Apr 2017 | JP |
2003-0060787 | Jul 2003 | KR |
2006-0056995 | May 2006 | KR |
2010-0048187 | May 2010 | KR |
2010-0078564 | Jul 2010 | KR |
2011-0014515 | Feb 2011 | KR |
10-2011-0054600 | May 2011 | KR |
10-1337005 | Dec 2013 | KR |
575501 | Feb 2004 | TW |
200428041 | Dec 2004 | TW |
200540522 | Dec 2005 | TW |
200704686 | Feb 2007 | TW |
200819871 | May 2008 | TW |
200827787 | Jul 2008 | TW |
200831962 | Aug 2008 | TW |
200931083 | Jul 2009 | TW |
201017236 | May 2010 | TW |
201022016 | Jun 2010 | TW |
201022794 | Jun 2010 | TW |
201035605 | Oct 2010 | TW |
201043675 | Dec 2010 | TW |
201128264 | Aug 2011 | TW |
201131218 | Sep 2011 | TW |
201142380 | Dec 2011 | TW |
201205160 | Feb 2012 | TW |
201207012 | Feb 2012 | TW |
201300893 | Jan 2013 | TW |
WO 1999036814 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 2000007046 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 2003074611 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004081090 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005050269 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2006113164 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007001555 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007020909 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007023929 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2008047785 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2010050355 | May 2010 | WO |
2010074144 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010079555 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010110549 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2011030757 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011058774 | May 2011 | WO |
2011065584 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011114884 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011162198 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2012021643 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012026192 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012033141 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012049977 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012090405 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO 2012141147 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012161078 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2012157662 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2012157663 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2013069162 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013080949 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2013100042 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2013187134 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO 2014021242 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014042022 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO 2014132726 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014171386 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014208519 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2014203894 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-123737 (dated Mar. 26, 2019). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-080665 (dated Jan. 8, 2019). |
Kikutani et al., “Methods of Birefringence Measurement and Examples of Data Analysis,” Seni Gakkaishi, 66(1): 39-44 (2010). |
Yamaoka (editor-in-chief), Dictionary of Optical Application Technologies and Materials, p. 362 (“Phase difference/protective film integrated polarizing plate (Fig. 5.1.17)”) (Sangyo-Gijutsu Service Center Co., Ltd. (publishing company), 2006). |
Chinese Patent Office, The Second Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201610447870.2 (dated Jan. 24, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Decision of Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-543689 (dated Apr. 24, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-157901 (dated Jul. 3, 2018). |
Chinese Patent Office, The Third Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480027949.9 (dated Mar. 5, 2019). |
DIC Color Design, Inc., “XYZ Color System” (2015) [obtained at http://www.dic-color.com/knowledge/xyz.html]. |
Fukuda et al., “New Green-Emitting Sialon-Based Phosphor for White LEDs,” Toshiba Review, 64(4): 60-63 (2009). |
Hartlove, “Quantum Dots Unleash High Color Gamut Performance in LED-Backlit Displays,” LEDs Magazine Japan, pp. 14-16 (Dec. 2011). |
Hirosaki et al., “White Light-emitting Diode Lamps for Lighting Applications,” Fujikura Technical Journal, 109: 1-4 (Oct. 2005). |
Ishikawa, Kenji, “3D Stereoscopic Images Are Coming,” Ohmsa Ltd., pp. 62-118 (Apr. 25, 2010). |
Japan Industrial Standard (JIS) Z 8701, “Color Display Method by XYZ Color System and X10Y10Z10 Color System,” Specification of Colours According to the CIE 1931—Standard Colorimetric System and the CIE 1964—Supplementary Standard Colorimetric System, pp. 111-119 (1982). |
Kato, Jour. Geol. Soc. Japan, 107(1): 64-67 (Jan. 2001). |
Kirk-Othmer, Concise Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, “Film and Sheeting Materials,” p. 1159 (1988). |
Kobayashi et al., “A Novel High Retardation Polymer Film for Liquid Crystal Displays,” FMCp-31, pp. 871-874, presented at 16th International Display Workshops (IDW '09), World Convention Center Summit, Miyazaki, Japan, pp. 1-209 and cover pages (Dec. 9-11, 2009). |
Kobayashi et al., 58th SPSJ Annual Meeting, Polymer Preprints, Japan, 58(1): 1362 (May 12, 2009). |
Kobayashi et al., 58th SPSJ Symposium on Macromolecules, Polymer Preprints, Japan, 58(2): 4144 (Sep. 1, 2009). |
Kobayashi et al., The Fifteenth Microoptics Conference, Technical Digest, pp. 30-31 (Oct. 25, 2009). |
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan Standard Industrial Classification, “Manufacturing industries of plastic films, sheets, floor materials, and artificial leather,” item 182 (revised Oct. 2013—enforced Apr. 1, 2014). |
Nagatsuka et al., Nitto Technical Journal, 27(1): 46-53 (May 1989). |
National Institute for Materials Science, “Success in Trial Production of White LED for Liquid Crystal Backlight—Improvement in Color Reproducibility of Liquid Crystal Display,” Press Release (Mar. 19, 2008). |
NEC, “LED Performance Required for Liquid Crystal Display for Industrial Use and LED B/L Technology,” NEC Technical Journal, vol. 60, No. 3/2007 (Sep. 2007). |
Olympus Corporation, “Series II: Basis of Polarization Analysis,” obtained from Olympus Corporation website (Jul. 13, 2009). |
Saito, “Illustrated Basis of Optics,” Electronics Series, First Edition, Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun Ltd. (publisher), pp. 154-157 (Nov. 25, 2011). |
Sharp Corporation, “LED Device for Liquid Crystal TV Backlight,” Sharp Technical Journal, 99: 20-22 (Aug. 2009). |
Tanaka, Kazushi, “Current Status and Future Perspective of Liquid Crystal Related Market in 2008, vol. 2,” pp. 379-382 (Fuji Chimera Research Institute, Inc., Jul. 28, 2008). |
Ukai, “Introduction to Flat Panel Display (6) FPD to Components and Materials Technology (1) Touch Panel,” The Chemical Times, 2011(4): 2-7 (2011). |
Wikipedia, “Backlight” (Dec. 4, 2015) [available on the internet at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backlight]. |
Chinese Patent Office, The Fourth Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201180030818.2 (dated Nov. 2, 2016). |
Chinese Patent Office, The Third Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280024048.5 (dated Oct. 17, 2016). |
Chinese Patent Office, The First Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201280058791.2 (dated Dec. 3, 2015). |
Chinese Patent Office, The First Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480027949.9 (dated Jun. 2, 2017). |
European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, in European Patent Application No. 11798082.1 (dated Nov. 14, 2016). |
European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, in European Patent Application No. 14186320.9 (dated Nov. 14, 2016). |
European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to Rule 114(2) EPC in European Patent Application No. 14186320.9 (dated Nov. 18, 2015). |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report in European Patent Application No. 12785180.6 (dated Jan. 30, 2015). |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report in European Patent Application No. 12786442.9 (dated Nov. 4, 2014). |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report in European Patent Application No. 14186320.9 (dated Dec. 22, 2014). |
Japanese Patent Office, Decision of Rejection in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-132122 (dated Jan. 13, 2015). |
Japanese Patent Office, Decision to Objection in Opposition No. 2016-700225 against Japanese Patent 5789564 B (Nov. 21, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2012/083849 (dated Mar. 12, 2013). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2012/083853 (dated Mar. 19, 2013). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2010/057956 (dated Aug. 10, 2010). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2011/064026 (dated Jul. 12, 2011). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2012/062476 (dated Jun. 26, 2012). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2012/062477 (dated Jul. 10, 2012). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2012/083848 (dated Apr. 2, 2013). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2013/070428 (dated Oct. 15, 2013). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2013/071201 (dated Sep. 10, 2013). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2014/052849 (dated Apr. 28, 2014). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2014/052850 (dated Mar. 4, 2014). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2014/060377 (dated Jun. 24, 2014). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2014/062286 (dated Jul. 22, 2014). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2014/062301 (dated Jul. 8, 2014). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2016/056336 (dated May 10, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2016/059301 (dated Jun. 14, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2016/070384 (dated Sep. 20, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2016/084524 (dated Jan. 31, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/JP2017/011981 (dated Jun. 6, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Dispatch for Duplicate Patent Opposition in Japanese Opposition No. 2016-700225, Dispatch No. 042937, in Japanese Patent 5789564 (May 13, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Dispatch for Duplicate Patent Opposition in Japanese Opposition No. 2016-700225, Dispatch No. 042941, in Japanese Patent 5789564 (May 13, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice on Information Offer Form in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-160702 (Jan. 29, 2013). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Information Offer in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-132122 (Jul. 15, 2014). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Observations by Third Parties in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-160702 (Jul. 2, 2013). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection in Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-259054 (dated Aug. 3, 2010). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection in Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-259054 (dated May 24, 2011). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-160702 (dated Apr. 10, 2012). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-160702 (dated Apr. 2, 2013). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-132122 (dated Dec. 3, 2013). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-132122 (dated Apr. 8, 2014). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Revocation in Japanese Patent No. 5789564 (dated Oct. 26, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-171990 (dated Oct. 4, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-174966 (dated Apr. 26, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-174966 (dated Nov. 29, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-174967 (dated Mar. 8, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-174968 (dated Mar. 8, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-174969 (dated Mar. 8, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-175930 (dated Mar. 8, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-198500 (dated Jan. 24, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-198501 (dated Mar. 29, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-284081 (dated Aug. 2, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-284081 (dated Mar. 7, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-284048 (dated Jun. 14, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-284049 (dated Jul. 5, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-284085 (dated Sep. 6, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-023667 (dated Oct. 4, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-027735 (dated Oct. 4, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-027736 (dated Nov. 22, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-027738 (dated Nov. 29, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-027743 (dated Nov. 22, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-027745 (dated Nov. 15, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-027750 (dated Nov. 22, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-027754 (dated Nov. 22, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-027755 (dated Nov. 22, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028054 (dated Nov. 15, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028062 (dated Nov. 15, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028157(dated Nov. 29, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028161(dated Nov. 29, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028259 (dated Feb. 6, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028260 (dated Oct. 4, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028260 (dated Feb. 6, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028263 (dated Oct. 4, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028263 (dated Feb. 6, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028271 (dated Dec. 20, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028290 (dated Nov. 22, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028349 (dated Dec. 20, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028365 (dated Dec. 20, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028378 (dated Dec. 20, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028384 (dated Jan. 4, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-060416 (dated Jan. 17, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-102468 (dated Jan. 24, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-103844 (dated Jan. 24, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-103941 (dated Jan. 17, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-105035 (dated Feb. 14, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-106235 (dated Dec. 20, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-106236 (dated Mar. 14, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-181235 (dated Jan. 10, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-228154 (dated Mar. 27, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-253159 (dated Jan. 10, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-253161 (dated Dec. 20, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-551788 (dated Dec. 6, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-006636 (dated Dec. 20, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-012284 (dated Jan. 17, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-017181 (dated Dec. 27, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-063352 (dated Jan. 31, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-063353 (dated Dec. 27, 2016). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-127016 (dated Mar. 20, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Submission of Information by a Third Party in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-132122 (Jan. 28, 2014). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Revocation in Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-700225 (dated Jun. 9, 2017). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Transmission of Duplicate of Argument in Opposition No. 2016-700225 against Japanese Patent 5789564 B (Nov. 21, 2017). |
Korean Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7031805 (dated Mar. 20, 2017). |
Taiwan Patent Office, Notification for the Opinions of Examination in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 101144456 (dated Mar. 20, 2015). |
Taiwan Patent Office, Notification for the Opinion of Examination in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 102127019 (dated Apr. 10, 2015). |
Olympus Corporation, “Learn More About Microscopes/Learn about polarizing microscopes from the basics/2nd Issue: Basic Polarization Analysis,” pp. 3-4 [downloaded from http://microscopelabo.jp/learn/009/index_2.html] (Mar. 1, 2017). |
Yasue, “Chapter 8: Polarization,” Feynman Physics II (published by Iwanami Shoten), 32nd revision, pp. 87-90 (Feb. 5, 1996). |
Japanese Patent Office, Office Action in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-027749 (dated Aug. 28, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-228945 (dated Aug. 28, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Decision of Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-525242 (dated Sep. 18, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Report of Consideration by Examiner before Appeal in Appeal No. 2018-010109 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-543689 (Oct. 30, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Report of Reconsideration by Examiner before Appeal in Appeal No. 2018-012616 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-239613 (Nov. 6, 2018). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-001046 (dated Nov. 20, 2018). |
OJI Scientific Instruments, “Measurement of Width Direction Profile of Phase Difference of Stretched Film” (Jan. 2009). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-163499 (dated May 7, 2019). |
Fujita, “Structure and Mechanism of Sensor Unit,” Transistor Technology, 46(8): 99-106 (2009). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-028049 (dated May 7, 2019). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-164364 (dated Jun. 4, 2019). |
Toyomasu et al., “Development of Negative Birefringence Polymeric Material for Novel Wide Viewing Angle Retardation Films,” TOSOH Research & Technology Review, 48: 23-29 (2004). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-543689 (dated Sep. 3, 2019). |
Kobayashi et al., “A High-Retardation Polymer Film for Viewing Liquid Crystal Displays through Polarized Sunglasses without Chromaticity Change in the Image,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 50(4R): 042602 (2011). |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, First Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201810166636.1 (dated Jun. 17, 2020). |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Refusal in Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-020312 (dated Mar. 31, 2020). |
China National Intellectual Property Administration, First Office Action in Chinese Patent Application No. 201810073029.0 (dated Jul. 1, 2020). |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/509,211, filed May 10, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/806,023, filed Dec. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/118,115, filed Nov. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/118,169, filed Nov. 15, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/476,339, filed Mar. 31, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/861,186, filed Jan. 3, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/246,255, filed Jan. 11, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190004367 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13509211 | US | |
Child | 16102345 | US |