This is a continuation-in-part application that claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/964,373 filed Aug. 12, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/682,886 filed Aug. 14, 2012, the contents of which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
The invention relates to processes for producing alcohol, and more particularly, processes for increasing alcohol yield using by-products typically discarded from conventional alcohol operations.
Alcohols are a renewable and clean fuel source. A grain alcohol commonly used as a fuel source is ethanol, which can be produced, in large part, from corn by the fermentation of starch. Generally, alcohol production is accomplished through a fermentation and distillation process wherein starches are released and converted to sugars, and then the sugars are converted to alcohol by the addition of yeast. At an industrial level, yeast fermentation processes only convert about one-third of the corn into alcohol.
Alcohol production facilities often begin the production process with a dry or wet milling process. In dry milling, corn, or another suitable grain, is ground up by a hammer or roller mill into a dry mixture of particles. The dry mixture of particles is combined with water and enzymes to break up the starch from the corn into smaller fragments and then subject the smaller fragments to a saccharification phase wherein the starch is converted to sugar. After the saccharification phase, resulting sugars are fermented with yeast to facilitate their conversion to alcohol.
Alcohol yield is dependent upon initial starch content of corn as well as the availability of starch to enzymes that are used in the saccharification phase. In conventional processes, the availability of starch is governed, in part, by the success of the dry milling or similar step in which the corn is broken up into smaller particles. Production processes currently used in commercial alcohol plants are not able to achieve maximum theoretical alcohol yield, which results in a significant amount of lost and discarded starch in the form of by-products such as Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS). Accordingly, there is still a need for a process that can obtain a closer to theoretical maximum yield to produce a certain amount of alcohol.
A process for producing alcohol that includes the steps of mixing grain and water to create a slurry that includes starch and cellulostic feedstock containing cellulose and hemi-cellulose. The starch in the slurry is hydrolyzed with non-cellulase enzymes to create a mixture including a starch hydrolysate and a non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock that is insoluble in the starch hydrolysate. The non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock is partially hydrolyzed in a holding tank for less than 1 hour, preferably less than 45 minutes, and more preferably less than 30 minutes, with a cellulase enzyme or a mixture of cellulase enzymes to create a partially hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock. The starch hydrolysate and the partially hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock are fermented with yeast to produce alcohol.
A process for producing alcohol that includes the steps of mixing grain and water to create a slurry that includes starch and cellulostic feedstock containing cellulose and hemi-cellulose. The starch in the slurry is hydrolyzed with non-cellulase enzymes to create a mixture comprising a starch hydrolysate and a non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock that is insoluble in the starch hydrolysate. A portion of the non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock is separated from the starch hydrolysate and the separated non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock is transferred into a holding tank. The starch hydrolysate is fermented with yeast to produce alcohol. The non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock is partially hydrolyzed in the holding tank less than 1 hour, preferably less than 45 minutes, and more preferably less than 30 minutes, with a cellulase enzyme or a mixture of cellulase enzymes to create a partially hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock that is fermented with yeast to produce alcohol.
Herein, when a range such as 5-25 (or 5 to 25) is given, this means preferably at least or more than 5 and, separately and independently, preferably not more than or less than 25. In an example, such a range defines independently not less than 5, and separately and independently, not more than 25.
The slurry can be heated in a cooking phase, such as by a jet cooker, at approximately 93 to 95 degrees Celsius or above and at 10 to 40 psi. The slurry can be subsequently held at an elevated temperature of about 80 to 90 degrees Celsius for a period of about 4 to 8 hours. Alternatively, the temperatures, pressures and time periods noted above can vary widely depending on a specific application. The jet cooker and the subsequent heating period preferably solubilize the starch contained the in grains in the fluid carrier.
In the alcohol production process, a liquefaction phase follows the cooking phase, at which point non-cellulase enzymes are added to the slurry in order to break down the starch polymer into short sections. Non-cellulase enzymes may include α-Amylase, β-Amylase, and γ-Amylase enzymes. The non-cellulase enzymes are preferably added between 50 to 60 degrees Celsius. The non-cellulase enzymes typically do not effectively hydrolyze starch at conditions, such as temperature, that cellulase enzymes are most effective. The liquefaction phase produces a hydrolyzed mixture from the slurry comprising a starch hydrolysate and a non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock, which is insoluble in the starch hydrolysate. The starch hydrolysate includes conventional starch to be fermented, while the non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock can include cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin and protein that would typically be discarded as waste materials. The non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock is at least 50 weight percent solid, and the short sections can be maltodextrins and oligosaccharides. A saccharification phase follows the liquefaction phase. The non-cellulase enzymes in the saccharification phase create a sugar mash in a mash cooling phase that can be transferred into fermentation tanks where yeast can convert sugars into carbon dioxide and alcohol, such as ethanol. In addition to alcohol, soluble and insoluble solids, which can include non-fermentable components and cellulostic feedstock, are left over from the grain. A distillation phase following the fermentation phase separates the liquid carrier, usually water, ethanol, and whole stillage. The water can be recycled and used, for example, in the slurry tanks The cellulostic feedstock is further separated in the distillation process, and can also be sold as high-protein animal feed.
As described, a significant amount of cellulostic feedstock is lost and discarded in the form of by-products such as Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS). DDGS typically contains about 12-15% cellulose and hemicellulose by weight on a dry weight basis, to which about 4-10% by weight starch can be bound. These by-products are not typically broken down or hydrolyzed by non-cellulase enzymes in conventional alcohol production. However, utilizing cellulase enzymes or a mixture of cellulase enzymes reduces the amount discarded by recovering glucose, xylose and arabinose from cellulose and hemicellulose. The cellulase enzymes or the mixture of cellulase enzymes comprises cellulases, xylanases or ligninases. As a result, as described below, the addition of the cellulase enzymes or mixture of cellulase enzymes can partly hydrolyze cellulostic feedstock prior to any fermentation steps and convert cellulose in the feedstock into glucose and hemicellulose in the feedstock into xylose and arabinose that can be subsequently fermented with yeast to produce alcohol. Preferably, less than 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 5, 4, 3, 2 or 1 weight percent of the cellulostic feedstock is hydrolyzed by the cellulase enzymes or mixture of cellulase enzymes. The use of cellulase enzymes or a mixture of cellulase enzymes can increase and improve alcohol yield over conventional alcohol processing. As described below, the cellulase enzymes or a mixture of cellulase enzymes can be added at a concentration of 0.015 to 0.9 weight percent by weight of grain, such as corn. For example, the cellulase enzymes or mixture of cellulase enzymes can be added at a concentration of at least 0.015, 0.016, 0.2, 0.28, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 weight percent.
As shown in
In addition to the flow diagram of
Following the secondary milling means, cellulase enzymes or the mixture of cellulase enzymes may be added to the mixture to break down and partially hydrolyze the non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock in the holding tank, wherein the non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock is held and mixed for at least 0.1 hour. The cellulase enzymes or the mixture of cellulase enzymes are preferably added at a temperature of 30 to 55 degrees Celsius and at the pH of 4.0 to 5.5 for a period of 0.1 to 4 or 2 to 24 hours. Preferably, the cellulase enzymes or mixture of cellulase enzymes may be in the holding tank for 0.1 to 1 hour, 0.2 to 0.8 hour, or less than 45, 40, 35 or 30 minutes. Following the holding tank, the starch hydrolysate and partially hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock may be fermented jointly with yeast to produce alcohol.
Alternatively to
In another embodiment, the mixture exiting the mash cooling phase, preferably below 55, 50, 45 or 40 degrees Celsius, may be separated into starch hydrolysate stream and a non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock stream as shown in
Once separated, the non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock may enter the secondary milling means to break down the non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock. Following the secondary milling means, the cellulase enzymes or mixture of cellulase enzymes may be added to the non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock in the holding tank to create the partially hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock. The non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock may be in the holding tank for the period of 0.1 to 4 or 2 to 24 hours at 30 to 55 degrees Celsius and at the pH of 4.0 to 5.5. Preferably, the non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock may be in the holding tank for 0.1 to 1 hour, 0.2 to 0.8 hour, or less than 45, 40, 35 or 30 minutes. Following the holding tank, the partially hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock may be combined with the starch hydrolysate for joint fermentation with yeast to produce alcohol.
In another embodiment, the starch hydrolysate and partially hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock may be fermented in separate fermentation operations as shown in
In addition to the methods described above, a controlled flow cavitation apparatus may be used as the secondary milling means to apply a specified cavitation activation energy. From the methods described above, hydrolyzed or non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock and the cellulase enzymes or mixture of cellulase enzymes may pass through the controlled flow cavitation apparatus. Alternatively, the cellulase enzymes or mixture of cellulase enzymes without partially hydrolyzed or non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock may pass through the controlled flow cavitation apparatus. Similarly, the non-cellulase enzymes may pass through a controlled flow cavitation apparatus with or without a mixture of starch and cellulostic feedstock. In addition, a mixture of starch and cellulostic feedstock, cellulase enzymes, and non-cellulase enzymes may enter together through the controlled flow cavitation apparatus.
Examples of static cavitational energy sources that can be used to apply cavitational energy to the non-hydrolyzed cellulostic feedstock include, but are not limited to, static mixers, orifice plates, perforated plates, nozzles, venturis, jet mixers, eductors, cyclonettes (e.g., Fluid-Quip, Inc.), and control flow cavitation devices (e.g., Arisdyne systems, Inc.), such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,810,052; 5,931,771; 5,937,906; 5,971,601; 6,012,492; 6,502,979; 6,802,639; 6,857,774 and 7,667,082. Additionally, the dynamic cavitational energy sources that can be used include, but are not limited to, rotary milling devices (e.g., EdeniQ Cellunator™), rotary mixers (e.g., HydroDynamics SPR, Magellan™), rotor-rotor (e.g., Eco-Fusion Canada Inc.) and rotor-stator devices (e.g., IKA® Works, Inc., Charles Ross & Son Company, Silverson Machines, Inc., Kinematica Inc.), such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,857,774; 7,178,975; 5,183,513; 5,184,576; 5,239,948; 5,385,298; 5,957,122; and 5,188,090.
In order to promote a further understanding of the invention, the following examples are provided. These examples are shown by way of illustration and not limitation.
From a corn ethanol production facility, a slip stream of 10 gallons of liquefied corn mash containing 32 percent solids was drawn from a 2-inch port between the mash tank and the mash cooler. A sample of the liquefied corn mash was directly fermented by addition of glucoamylase enzyme. Fermentation of the corn mash and glucoamylase enzyme was carried out in a flask for 60 hours at a temperature of 82° F. The contents of the flask were analyzed by HPLC to determine ethanol yield. The ethanol yield was 14.051 percent.
From a corn ethanol production facility, a slip stream of 10 gallons of liquefied corn mash containing 32 percent solids was drawn from a 2-inch port between the mash tank and the mash cooler. The corn mash was transferred into a holding tank and cellulase enzyme, CTE SMZ XC-150, was added to the corn mash at 0.2025 percent of the solids loading in the corn mash. The mixture of corn mash and cellulase enzyme was held in the holding tank at about 122° F. for 10 minutes. After 10 minutes in the holding tank, fermentation of the corn mash and glucoamylase enzyme was carried out in a flask for 60 hours at a temperature of 82° F. The contents of the flask were analyzed by HPLC to determine ethanol yield. The ethanol yield was 14.123 percent.
From a corn ethanol production facility, a slip stream of 10 gallons of liquefied corn mash containing 32 percent solids was drawn from a 2-inch port between the mash tank and the mash cooler. The corn mash was transferred into a holding tank and cellulase enzyme, CTE SMZ XC-150, was added to the corn mash at 0.2025 percent of the solids loading in the corn mash. The mixture of corn mash and cellulase enzyme was held in the holding tank at about 122° F. for 30 minutes. After 30 minutes in the holding tank, fermentation of the corn mash and glucoamylase enzyme was carried out in a flask for 60 hours at a temperature of 82° F. The contents of the flask were analyzed by HPLC to determine ethanol yield. The ethanol yield was 14.262 percent.
From a corn ethanol production facility, a slip stream of 10 gallons of liquefied corn mash containing 32 percent solids was drawn from a 2-inch port between the mash tank and the mash cooler. The corn mash was transferred into a holding tank and cellulase enzyme, CTE SMZ XC-150, was added to the corn mash at 0.2025 percent of the solids loading in the corn mash. The mixture of corn mash and cellulase enzyme was held in the holding tank at about 122° F. for 45 minutes. After 45 minutes in the holding tank, fermentation of the corn mash and glucoamylase enzyme was carried out in a flask for 60 hours at a temperature of 82° F. The contents of the flask were analyzed by HPLC to determine ethanol yield. The ethanol yield was 14.259 percent.
As can be seen from Examples 3 and 4, an increase in residence time in the holding tank from 30 minutes to 45 minutes yielded substantially the same ethanol yield. Thus, a residence time in the holding tank of less than 45 minutes, and also less than 30 minutes can be used to provide ethanol yields the same as or similar to ethanol yields as compared to the same process with residence times in the hold tank of more than 45 minutes. Reducing the residence time of the corn mash and cellulase enzyme to less than 45 minutes, and preferably less than 30 minutes, ethanol processing time and costs are reduced.
From a corn ethanol production facility, a slip stream of 10 gallons of liquefied corn mash containing 32 percent solids was drawn from a 2-inch port between the mash tank and the mash cooler. The corn mash was transferred into a holding tank and cellulase enzyme, CTE SMZ XC-150, was added to the corn mash at 0.2025 percent of the solids loading in the corn mash. The mixture of corn mash and cellulase enzyme was held in the holding tank at about 122° F. for 30 minutes. After 30 minutes in the holding tank, the corn mash and cellulase enzyme mixture was fed through a cavitation apparatus made up of a tube having a single orifice constriction with a diameter of 5.46 mm at an inlet pressure of 100 psi. After passing through the cavitation apparatus, fermentation of the corn mash and glucoamylase enzyme was carried out in a flask for 60 hours at a temperature of 82° F. The contents of the flask were analyzed by HPLC to determine ethanol yield. The ethanol yield was 14.526 percent.
From a corn ethanol production facility, a slip stream of 10 gallons of liquefied corn mash containing 32 percent solids was drawn from a 2-inch port between the mash tank and the mash cooler. The corn mash was transferred into a holding tank and cellulase enzyme, CTE SMZ XC-150, was added to the corn mash at 0.2025 percent of the solids loading in the corn mash. The mixture of corn mash and cellulase enzyme was held in the holding tank at about 122° F. for 30 minutes. After 30 minutes in the holding tank, the corn mash and cellulase enzyme mixture was fed through a cavitation apparatus made up of a tube having a single orifice constriction with a diameter of 5.46 mm at an inlet pressure of 200 psi. After passing through the cavitation apparatus, fermentation of the corn mash and glucoamylase enzyme was carried out in a flask for 60 hours at a temperature of 82° F. The contents of the flask were analyzed by HPLC to determine ethanol yield. The ethanol yield was 14.517 percent.
As can be seen from Examples 5 and 6, passing the contents of the holding tank (corn mash and cellulase enzyme) through a cavitation apparatus increased ethanol yield. Comparing Examples 5 and 6 to Example 3, the use of the cavitation apparatus increased ethanol yield in the range of 0.255 to 0.264 percent.
It should now be apparent that there has been provided, in accordance with the present invention, a novel process for enhancing alcohol production by utilizing conventional starch by-products that satisfies the benefits and advantages set forth above. Moreover, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many modifications, variations, substitutions and equivalents for the features described above may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is expressly intended that all such modifications, variations, substitutions and equivalents which fall within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims to be embraced thereby.
The preferred embodiments have been described, herein. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the above methods may incorporate changes and modifications without departing from the general scope of this invention. It is intended to include all such modifications and alterations in so far as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61682886 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13964373 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14747563 | US |