1. Field of the Invention
This invention pertains generally to progressive awards in the field of gaming and lottery. More particularly, the invention relates to methods for funding and displaying a progressive award prize.
2. The Prior Art
Progressive award prizes in the field of gaming and lottery are known. For example, in the field of casino gaming progressive prizes are typically provided as jackpot prize pursuant to play on a slot machine or group of slot machines. Typically, the progressive prize is awarded when a qualifying award event occurs during play on the gaming device (e.g., a symbol or combination of symbols appearing on a wagered payline) or according to some other condition (e.g., random selection from a central controller).
In general, progressive prizes are funded by the play of one or more game devices. For example, a portion of each wager placed on a slot machine (e.g., 1%) may be used to fund the progressive prize. In some cases, the progressive prize may be “seeded” by the operator so that the progressive prize starts at a particular amount (e.g., a pre-determined minimum amount). As the game device or group of game devices are played, the progressive prize grows as portions of each wager contribute to the progressive prize. In some cases, the likelihood of obtaining the qualifying award event is set to a low value, and the progressive prize grows to substantially large amounts. The excitement of play on these high volatility games generates even more play from players, further increasing the progressive prize.
In accordance with the prior art implementations, the current sum of the contributions made to the progressive are its value or prize, and is displayed to the player. Where a group of gaming devices participates in the same progressive prize, a large sign or display may be used to indicate the current value of the progressive prize. The value of the progressive prize is further shown as a dynamically increasing amount, using a rollup or count-up feature, similar to other rollup indicators as odometers, for example.
The value of the progressive prize displayed to the players, while equal to the actual contributions, is not awarded as a lump sum when a player wins. What is given to a winning player is an annuity whose summed lifetime payments have the same value as the sum of the current contributions. By the same token, if a player chooses a lump sum payment instead of an annuity, the lump sum award will be the amount the aforementioned annuity would cost, which is less (usually substantively less) than the current contribution value.
By way of illustration, suppose the contributions to the progressive prize are one million dollars ($1,000,000). The progressive prize display would also indicate $1,000,000. However, the progressive prize display represents a payment over an annuity period (e.g., a twenty-five (25) year annuity). In this example, if a player were to win the progressive prize, the $1,000,000 would be paid to the player over a 25-year period. The player could elect a “face value pay off” in which case, the player would receive a reduced amount (e.g., $400,000) depending on market conditions.
This arrangement is selected in prior art progressive systems by casino operators (or progressive providers) to derive income from the progressive game. Whether a player chooses a lump sum or annuitized win, the cost to the casino is the same or within a relatively small additive factor of magnitude of each other (depending on how the programming is set up, the annuities available at the time, etc.), and is less considerably than the current sum that has been collected for the progressive. The casino or progressive operator makes profit from the progressive by keeping the difference between the lump sum or cost of the annuity and current amount collected for the progressive. Using the above example, the casino operator (or progressive provider) derives income from the difference ($600,000) between the actual contributions ($1,000,000) and the payout amount or cost of an annuity ($400,000).
Unfortunately, this arrangement while suitable for deriving a profit for the casino operator (or progressive provider), creates dissatisfaction from players who realize that the player does not win the amount actually contributed to the progressive prize, but rather a reduced amount (i.e., the pay off amount is not equal to the actual contributions to the progressive). The present invention uses a new and different business model to present a new and more exciting progressive payout to players having a different source of profit for casino operators.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description of the present invention is illustrative only and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons having the benefit of this disclosure.
The present invention is a method for funding, displaying and awarding a progressive prize which increases player interest by displaying a progressive prize amount to equal to the future annuity value of the progressive prize, rather than the face value of the prize (the actual amount collected for the progressive from the participating gaming machines). A player may chooses a lump sum payment; in such cases that would be the actual amount of collected funds for the progress; thus, the single “pay off” amount is equal to the actual contributions to the progressive fund (minus any reasonable management or handling fees, which in a preferred embodiment is a small [less than 1%] fixed percentage of the progressive contributions), rather than a reduced amount as with the prior art. Note: as used in this disclosure, “actual contributions to a progressive” or any language expressing the same or similar concept is mean to include (i) the actual amount collected for a progressive of any kind, and (ii) the actual amount collected minus any relatively small amount extracted from the collected total as a service, handling, or management fee (for example, to cover the costs of operating a progressive network operating center).
Player interest and participation are increased over the prior art due to the excitement created by the larger progressive prize (the amortized winning amount, which is the value of the prize when the annuity is purchased and the total amount of all payments summed) displayed to players. Further, the amortized winning amount will grow faster and higher than the actual cash contributions. The casino operator or gaming machine owners will realize increased revenue derived from the increased player interest and participation in the base games, rather than taking a portion of the progressive prize as profit.
Referring to
The progressive controller 12 comprises a data processing device or computer suitable for carrying out the operations described herein. A suitable controller 12 generally includes a processor board having a processor coupled to a memory for data storage and input/output (I/O) interfaces for communication to I/O devices. A server operating system software provided on a memory is executed by the processor to provide typical server functionality including, among other things, providing an application layer on which the funding module 20 of the present invention operates. I/O devices, such as a display, a keyboard, a network card, a printer, may be coupled to the I/O interface of the controller 12 to provide communication with an operator and/or other devices. The progressive controller 12 executes the funding module 20 to fund a progressive prize 22 in accordance with the present invention. The operations of the funding module 20 are described more fully below in conjunction with
The progressive controller 12 is coupled for communication to the player terminals 18a through 18n, normally via a network connection 16, such as ethernet for example. The progressive controller 12 may also be used to fund the progressive prize 22 through a wide area network (WAN), where two or more separate gaming sites participate in a shared progressive. In these cases, local progressive controllers each operating in a local network may then be coupled for communication with a central progressive controller through a WAN communication link. While the arrangement, cabling, and communication of a WAN is often more complex than that of a local area network (LAN), the principles of the present invention are equally suitable for use in either or both environments.
The player terminals 18a through 18n may be casino gaming devices, such as slot machines, video poker machines, or video keno machines, for example. The player terminals 18a through 18n may also be video lottery terminals (VLTs) where a player may purchase video lottery games from a central lottery controller. The present invention is also suitable for use with table games, bingo games, and other games incorporating a progressive feature.
Communication means are provided on the player terminals 18a through 18n in order to communicate wager information to the progressive controller 12 so that an accurate accounting of progressive prize contributions may be made by the progressive controller 12. The player terminals 18a through 18n also notify the progressive controller 12 when a progressive win event or other qualifying event occurs. In some cases the progressive win event or other qualifying event is determined centrally (e.g., by the progressive controller 12 or other central server). In this case, the central device communicates the win event to appropriate player terminal to notify the player of the progressive win event.
Referring now to
First at block 100, one preferred embodiment is to fund the progressive by collecting a percentage of the wagers (e.g., 1%) placed on the player terminals 18a through 18n. In this way, the player terminals 18a through 18n communicate wagering information to the progressive controller via network 16 so that the progressive controller 12 is able to calculate progressive contribution.
Also indicated in block 100 are other funding methods, any of which are readily be usable with the present invention. An example of another embodiment for funding is to take a fixed initial amount from the casino's promotional funds (the same funds used to pay for player incentives such as a promotional meals and the like) to fund the initial prize pool or jackpot amount. In this case, there could be periodic increments in the jackpot amount, such as an additional $10,000 added per week until the jackpot is won. Other funding methods may be used as well; the present invention is usable with any source of funds for the cash pool (jackpot amount). Note that in some embodiments, the jackpot may be a fixed jackpot rather than a progressive jackpot; the present invention is fully usable for any type of jackpot, fixed or growing.
At block 110, the funding module 12 accumulates the progressive contribution from each of the player terminals 18a through 18n (from Block 100) into a total progressive amount corresponding to the progressive prize 22.
At block 120, the funding module 12 then calculates the future annuity value of the actual current progressive prize 22 based on financial market conditions (e.g., current interest rates, annuity term, etc.). The future annuity value represents the total amount of the progressive award when paid over the annuity term including annuity earnings, and is normally substantially higher than the actual contributions received from the player terminals 18a through 18n.
At block 130, the progressive controller 12 then displays the calculated future annuity value of the progressive prize 22 via progressive display 14. As noted above this value is higher than the actual progressive contributions received, but is paid over the annuity term. On the other hand, the “present of face value pay off” is equal to the actual progressive contributions received. Other means for creating player interest and participation via display features may also be used, such as use large displays incorporating rollup or count-up features, for example.
At decision block 140, a determination is made as to whether a progressive win event has occurred. In some embodiments, this determination is made by the player terminals 18a through 18n pursuant to events occurring thereon. In other embodiments, this determination is made centrally (e.g., by the progressive controller 12). If a progressive win event has occurred block 150 is then carried out. Otherwise blocks 100 through 140 are repeated.
At decision block 150, a determination is made as to whether the winner of the progressive elects a “present pay off” or “period payments.” If the winner elects a present pay off, block 160 is then carried out. If the winner elects period payments over the annuity period, block 170 is then carried out. In alternative embodiments, the player may not be provided a choice, in which case processing proceeds in accordance with the defined payout strategy (block 160 for present pay off; block 170 for period payments).
At block 160, the winner has elected to receive a single lump sum payment for the progressive award. In this case the winner is paid a “pay off” amount equal to the actual contributions received from the player terminals 18a through 18n. The progressive game is concluded. A new progressive game may then be started.
At block 170, the winner has elected periodic payments. The actual progressive prize (actual contributions from player terminals 18a through 18n) are then placed in an interest bearing account.
At block 180, the winner is then awarded period payments in accordance with the annuity program defined by the progressive rules (e.g., rate of pay, annuity terms). At the conclusion of all the period payments, the total payments will approximately equal the calculated future annuity value determined in block 120 and displayed to the players at block 130. The progressive game is concluded. A new progressive game may then be started.
Under this arrangement, player interest in participating in the progressive system 10 is increased because the accelerated rate in which the progressive prize display 14 amount is increased over prior art implementations. Although the casino operator (or progressive provider) does not derive income from the reduced progressive award payoff strategies in the prior art, overall revenue is increased due to the increased game play and participation which is fostered due to the larger “future annuity” progressive award which is displayed to the players. The present arrangements also relieves much of the dissatisfactions players experience when electing the “present pay off” because in accordance with the present invention, the present pay off equals to actual contributions to the progressive award, rather than a reduced amount.
As discussed above, the present invention allows the casino to display a larger payout value than prior art methods. This then enables a new and different business model to be used by casinos and progressive operators. In the past, the use of an annuity to pay out a progressive in the amount shown from the actual pay-in was beneficial to the progressive operator, but is at the expense of the owners or operators of the underlying games. The present invention is a new business model which benefits the owner or operators of the gaming machines, and not the progressive operators (if they are different, which is often the case in casino environments).
The business model of the present invention is illustrated as column 302. Column portion 312 corresponds to the normal income a gaming machine operator would expect without the additional draw of a progressive. Column portion 310 illustrates several business aspects of the present invention that are differentiable over the prior art. First, notice that the extra income is comprised of a single portion. This business model of the present invention works to the benefit of the gaming machine operators rather than the progressive operators (notice the lack of any portion of the column attributed to the progressive operators). The single column portion represents the additional game play income due to the higher player interest generated by the larger progressive amount displayed as the winning amount of the progressive. There is no portion of the progressive winnings that becomes additional income to the gaming machine or progressive operators; all the contributions made to the progressive pool (minus any expenses) are given back to the players. Thus, the business model of the present invention shows no extra income taken or extracted directly from the progressive itself.
The column portion indicated as 310 is entirely due to extra game play from the higher interest generated in players due to the higher winnable progressive amounts (so results in additional game play over the prior art, comparable to column section 306). This extra income goes directly to the gaming machine owners or operators. The business model encourages additional player interest at the expense of making any profits directly from the progressive; however, extra game play is the benefit to the gaming machine operators or owners.
The invention further relates to machine readable media on which are stored embodiments of the present invention. It is contemplated that any media suitable for retrieving instructions is within the scope of the present invention. By way of example, such media may take the form of magnetic, optical, or semiconductor media. The invention also relates to data structures that contain embodiments of the present invention, and to the transmission of data structures containing embodiments of the present invention.
This application claims priority from and incorporates by reference U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/384,627, filed on 31 May 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4948134 | Suttle et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
6068552 | Walker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6102799 | Stupak | Aug 2000 | A |
6110042 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6312330 | Jones et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6916245 | Vancura et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
20030104857 | Jenkins | Jun 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60384627 | May 2002 | US |